I agree. How wonderful!

Wrong... Brahman alone

All is brahman -> There is only brahman

brahman is consist of all brahmins

Me too man I'm so deep into the universe right now

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nq1nZqhyzcy5cY0.html This explains precisely

in sanskrit it is called sanatana

So basically this is we’re we return after death ?

@@keepinguphuh7973 There's no need to return. Egotistic self is just a projection of your infinite "Is" ness. You are it primarily.

@@keepinguphuh7973 This is who and what we are. Except it’s not a who or a what.

same question

Follow Advaita Philosophy. Delve deep into its teachings.

@@bvssrsguntur6338 Follow Advaita Philosophy. Delve deep into its teachings.

Knower, knowing, known...all three are atma, while atma are not any of these.

@@pravinasings8098 not as a concept no

Ishwara is Saguna Brahman (Brahman with Maya). Brahman the Ultimate is Nirguna Brahman.

Again "Consciousness" is closest translation of Atmān we use. U're using Freudian description 'nd imposing on something tht lies beyond it. Atman can only be found through Negation. The only quality ascribed to it are "Sat Chit Ananda" i.e Existence-Awareness-Bliss. Here "Awareness" means it is only aware of itself in Turiya. Freudian description of consciousness is different from Vedantin view point. Acc. to Vedanta, the three states of Waking, Dreaming 'nd Deep sleep pulsates in the field of Atman. Atman is considered 4th state i.e "Turiya" actually not different, rather the ground field on which Waking, Dreaming 'nd Deep sleep oscillates. Freud categorisation is of mind not of Atman. Mind has consciousness, subconsciousness 'nd unconsciousness. Atman is the fundamental substratum on which these categorisation of states of mind oscillates. Tht categorisation can vary acc. to Freudians, Greeks, Indians etc, but the ground substratum remains same 'nd tht is Atmān!

Plus u're mixing up with words 'nd Freudian categorisation imposed on Vedantin categorisation. Call it sub consciousness or Self with big "S" or simply Awareness or Cosmic Cat consciousness or Tathagatgarbha etc, it doesn't matter. Words can't grasp it, it is nameless. Sages called it "Atman" but this word itself isn't tht.

The material universe is the ignorant mind which is locked up in countless lala lands.

@@PhillipBell Fortunately there is a time/time/movement continuum.

Swami ji is saying back hole as a tear in fabric informally as space time continuum is 4D and impossible to imagine. Interesting thing is that at black hole , Space coordinate and Time coordinate switch their roles mean space becomes time and vice versa as per Genereal theory of relativity thereby forbidding laws of physics there😅

@@Sg0224 a black whole is not a tear in the fabric of space. At the center is a singularity which is the remnant of what used to be a star that died and imploded and instead if its energy moving outwardly it implodes and all the gravity from that density is what gives the resemblance to a hole but it isn't even a hole it is just a region of space where the gravity around the dead star is so strong that nothing can escape including light hence the term black hole and you cannot go through one. When you cross the even horizon which is the area where the gravity is so strong nothing can escape then you are doomed to travel faster and faster until you reach the singularity where you are either crushed death or stretched to pieces no kne knows which but you will die because you aren't going through anything. It's not a hole and it's not a tear in space. He got his analogy wrong. He might be thinking about the wormhole theory. In either case his analogy is wrong.

Does that mean the spirit or light of a human can never escape ?

​@@allenmorgan4309does that mean a spirit or light of an observer or human can never escape once in the black hole ?

wrong, mahadev shiva is the self of all, he is brahman and the maya is shakti of brahman, together they are ishwar/parameshwar half masculine and half feminine they are complete cosmic consciousness and cosmic body and whole in ardhanareshwar state , krishna is the avatar of bhagwan vishnu, who is the combined form of shiva and shakti but masculine dominat and his half is mata laxshmi who is aslo combined from of shiva and shakti but feminine dominant. also even bhagwan ram and bhagwan krishna were the daily worshiper of shiva and shakti they used to do every day morning pooja in shiva lingum format as brahman and maya together in one whole form and formless of cosmic consciousness and cosmic body, the upper form or cylinder any shaped form represents nirgun brahman which is like water and can be in any shape and the base represents sagun brahman

Lord Krishna avatar of Vishnu was BrahmAn on earth. BrahmAn is not lord Krishna. Both are different.

@@animax1034 Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva are BrahmAn himself. Vishnu is not a combination of Shiva and Shakti as you think.

Sri Krsna Is avatari the source of all Avataras Sri Visnu included, He's parama iswara the supreme controller, Siva Is not God, brahma Is not God, only Krsna Is God, the brahman Is the light emanated from His body, he Is Also the paramatma the supersoul.

@@animax1034 Better you keep on ,studying the sastra, you are totally in maha maya

You are the proof. You find it within you. You can never discover the truth with an external instruments or senses that are tuned for survival only. To transcend the survival mechanism, the answer is within

Stop using your head and open your heart and discover within

What kind of proof would be valid to you?

@@beyondheartmindsoul3443 Those who conclude a difference between within and without are fake spiritualists only.

@@newcruiser That's the question to ask!