Well, of course there was no reaction from the crowd, the answer is right there, they were a crowd *at* a Trump rally, they had not a lot to work with - to begin with, in the cranial department, of course, no wonder there was no reaction.
@BARelementАй бұрын
😂😂 Chile
@ProfDanielVargasАй бұрын
@@BARelement what?
@ratewcropolixАй бұрын
@@ProfDanielVargas they said chile
@ProfDanielVargasАй бұрын
@@ratewcropolix I know BARelement said "Chile" but what's the meaning of it? What does that have to do with the video or with anything I said?
@coldmexican288Ай бұрын
@@ProfDanielVargasdidn't I just commented at you in a Spanish speaking channel?
@TheGamer-nj9ifАй бұрын
Place your bets on if Vaush streams again today!!!!!! Place your bets!!!!!
@taliakelly554Ай бұрын
Hope so, missed this one
@hypernova6093Ай бұрын
Cat pfp based
@catalyst7269Ай бұрын
Biden speaks at 8ET, I’ll say he streams again
@TheProblem2025Ай бұрын
Guy about to do something newsworthy: he will if I have anything to say about it!! /this is a joke I do not go outside
@josefaksoy42Ай бұрын
He did not
@StopLizardАй бұрын
Stream starts at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1008">16:48</a>
@RealTrueAnonAccountАй бұрын
Thank you!
@electron6825Ай бұрын
Or does it?
@mutterbuffin6916Ай бұрын
Thank you
@ItThatStaresАй бұрын
Thann you soldier
@SatoKureАй бұрын
Congrats on hitting 450K subscribers (again) (again again), Vaush!
@jimmylaser5587Ай бұрын
its just me getting tired of Vaush screaming at chat and unsubscribing, and then subscribing again when I desperately need to say something very clever in yt chat
@lhrosts7082Ай бұрын
I've unsubbed from him some time ago because all other people I watch upload once a week/month/year, and so my timeline would end up dominated with his videos which I have already watched in the VOD
Genuinely wondering, I see how the 2nd amendment has evolved into general American firearms culture with some branching around self-defense and that can be its own thing. But the amendment itself justifies it for the purposes of forming a militia. Vaush says the US has a history of presidential assassinations and that is certainly true. Reps of both parties are now speaking out against "political violence of any kind" but it seems, that was exactly the intent of the 2nd amendment - and something Republicans, voters more than reps, have threatened to carry out in the past, then also "justified by the constitution".
@M3G4FR34KАй бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1793">29:53</a> Tony Statovci (among others surely) did this exact bit with that Many Men verse 😂 at least he's joking though
@Skynet_15Ай бұрын
I love Tony, really smart jokes
@lmcd301Ай бұрын
Just want to point out at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="67">1:07</a>:09 literally all of chat being insufferable while the liberal guy said nothing at all that they disagreed with, and only made points that agree with Vaush’s, if they’d listened.
@cjwrecks7418Ай бұрын
Not the case, it might sound the same if you don't actually understand the issue with framing. The Liberal CNN guy vaguely talks about "some figures who talk the most violently" while Vaush says "It's the right, they are demons" he doesn't leave the framing open to interpretation which is something mainstream media doesn't do because they want to fuel that hate and allow for a gesturing at both sides bullshit. That's why chat was being "insufferabe" because he's purposefully being vague to not call out the people actually responsible- THE RIGHT.