Big Think Interview With Benoit Mandelbrot | Big Think

  Рет қаралды 49,379

Big Think

Big Think

Күн бұрын

Big Think Interview With Benoit Mandelbrot
New videos DAILY: bigth.ink/youtube
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos: bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A conversation with the mathematician and Professor Emeritus at Yale University.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benoît B. Mandelbrot:
Benoît B. Mandelbrot is a French and American mathematician, best known as the father of fractal geometry. He is Sterling Professor of Mathematical Sciences, Emeritus at Yale University; IBM Fellow Emeritus at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center; and Battelle Fellow at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Mandelbrot was born in Poland and educated in France, and is now a dual French and American citizen. His books include the classic "The Fractal Geometry of Nature" (1982).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:
Benoit Mandelbrot: Benoit Mandelbrot, Sterling Professor, Emeritus at Yale University, IBM Fellow Emeritus at IBM Research Center.
Question: What is fractal geometry?
Benoit Mandelbrot: Well, regular geometry, the geometry ofrnEuclid, is concerned with shapes which are smooth, except perhaps for cornersrnand lines, special lines which are singularities, but some shapes in nature arernso complicated that they are equally complicated at the big scale and comerncloser and closer and they don’t become any less complicated. Closer and closer, or you go farther orrnfarther, they remain equally complicated. rnThere is never a plane, never a straight line, never anything smooth andrnordinary. The idea is very, veryrnvague, is expressed - it’s an expression of reality.
Fractal geometry is a new subject and each definition I tryrnto give for it has turned out to be inappropriate. So I’m now being cagey and saying there are very complexrnshapes which would be the same from close by and far away.
Question: What does it mean to say that fractal shapes arernself-similar?
Benoit Mandelbrot: Well, if you look at a shape like arnstraight line, what’s remarkable is that if you look at a straight line fromrnclose by, from far away, it is the same; it is a straight line. That is, the straight line has arnproperty of self-similarity. Eachrnpiece of the straight line is the same as the whole line when used to a big orrnsmall extent. The plane again hasrnthe same property. For a longrntime, it was widely believed that the only shapes having these extraordinaryrnproperties are the straight line, the whole plane, the whole space. Now in a certain sense, self-similarityrnis a dull subject because you are used to very familiar shapes. But that is not the case. Now many shapes which are self-similarrnagain, the same seen from close by and far away, and which are far from beingrnstraight or plane or solid. Andrnthose shapes, which I studied and collected and put together and applied inrnmany, many domains, I called fractals.
Question: How can complex natural shapes be representedrnmathematically?
Benoit Mandelbrot: Well, historically, a mountain could notrnbe represented, except for a few mountains which are almost like cones. Mountains are very complicated. Ifrnyou look closer and closer, you find greater and greater details. If you look away until you find thatrnbigger details become visible, and in a certain sense this same structurernappears at those scales. If yournlook at coastlines, if you look at that them from far away, from an airplane,rnwell, you don’t see details, you see a certain complication. When you come closer, the complicationrnbecomes more local, but again continues. rnAnd come closer and closer and closer, the coastline becomes longer andrnlonger and longer because it has more detail entering in. However, these details amazingly enoughrnenters this certain this certain regular fashion. Therefore, one can study a coastline **** object because therngeometry for that existed for a long time, and then I put it together and appliedrnit to many domains.
Question: What was the discovery process behind thernMandelbrot set?
Benoit Mandelbrot: The Mandelbrot set in a certain sense isrna **** of a dream I had and an uncle of mine had since I was about 20. I was a student of mathematics, but notrnhappy with mathematics that I was taught in France. Therefore, looking for other topics, an uncle of mine, whornwas a very well-known pure mathematician, wanted me to study a certain theoryrnwhich was then many years old, 30 years old or something, but had in a wayrnstopped developing. When he wasrnyoung he had tried to get this theory out of a rut and he didn’t succeed,rnnobody succeeded.
Read the full transcript at bigthink.com/videos/big-think...

Пікірлер: 45
@GiI11
@GiI11 2 жыл бұрын
Seeing ol' B-brot laying it down might be better than tripping through 1024 zooms of his set.
@nyb_ok
@nyb_ok 6 жыл бұрын
What an extraordinary mind.. hearing from the genius himself feels like you are now in a different universe of mathematics.
@lugwrench9832
@lugwrench9832 3 жыл бұрын
Basically, the finite coexists in with the infinite where each depends on the other.
@RobSinclaire
@RobSinclaire 11 жыл бұрын
Very grateful for this presentation Benoit, thank you very much to everyone involved. "be fruitful, multiply" (gen 9:7) takes on a whole new meaning!
@pranavkondapalli9306
@pranavkondapalli9306 2 жыл бұрын
8 year old comment damn. You still use youtube?
@jakestewart7079
@jakestewart7079 8 жыл бұрын
Now this guy knows his trig identities.
@krakenmetzger
@krakenmetzger 4 жыл бұрын
I doubt it. Very visual person. Mandelbrot struggled reciting the alphabet. Trig identities probably not his thing.
@TGC40401
@TGC40401 6 жыл бұрын
Underrated video.
@adulby
@adulby 11 жыл бұрын
Thank you Benoit.
@chronic2001n
@chronic2001n 9 жыл бұрын
This represents the nature of the observable, physical reality
@gmshadowtraders
@gmshadowtraders 9 жыл бұрын
24:27 - Mandlebrot beautifully rips apart Bachelier's theory of random speculative prices in financial markets.
@takeniteasyfriend
@takeniteasyfriend 6 жыл бұрын
So simply explained also; prices in time aren't always continuous and not independent...
@menesiart
@menesiart 3 жыл бұрын
Happy birthday Mr. Mandelbrot
@franciscootaviano1963
@franciscootaviano1963 7 жыл бұрын
Alguém pode traduzir este vídeo para o português?
@Daski69
@Daski69 6 жыл бұрын
Can there be true fractals in nature though since the smallest particle still has a finite size? Would a quark not be the end of the pattern (or whatever may be even smaller, point is that there is(?) a stop to how small matter gets) rendering the circumference of a finite area also, huge, but finite? Or is the point of the concept that I did not get that infinite fractals are purely mathematical and not actually natural? thanks!
@jstoltz309
@jstoltz309 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I think that nature (the physical world) is more to be thought of as "fractaline", since as you point out, there is a level to which it is not meaningful/possible to "zoom" beyond. The universe is discrete and has certain boundaries but purely mathematical structures can be defined as "infinite". Also, in nature there are qualitative differences at different scale levels, whereas e.g. the Mandelbrot set just looks more or less the same regardless of scale level. So clearly the universe is not "just" a fractal, there is much more to it :)
@mtstash
@mtstash 4 жыл бұрын
Do they have a finite size or are they infinite in resolution?
@djspins
@djspins 2 жыл бұрын
i dont know shit. muons?
@philippweisang
@philippweisang 2 жыл бұрын
In nature, you run into so-called "crossovers". Meaning the rules describing a fractal only hold to a certain scale. Sort of like the distinction between relativistic and newtonian mechanics in Physics
@nicheplusarchitecture8632
@nicheplusarchitecture8632 11 ай бұрын
at least for visually observable objects, absolutely not because at some point the rules governing the self-similarity in that object will cease to "make sense". So it is common to read or see the phrase "self-similar at ______ number of iterations". In one talk Benoit said the universe could be fractal at a certain point only.
@Guy_de_Loimbard
@Guy_de_Loimbard 2 жыл бұрын
Q: What does the "B" stand for in Benoit B. Mandelbrot? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
@nyb_ok
@nyb_ok 6 жыл бұрын
I saw a book called "Louis Bachelier's Theory of Speculation: The Origins of Modern Finance. Has anyone read this book? Does it require a background in finance?
@danno321s
@danno321s 11 жыл бұрын
R.I.P.
@JimBCameron
@JimBCameron 8 жыл бұрын
Couldn't help relate the comments on sudden large fluctuations in financial markets to Gould's 'Punctuated Equilibrium' in evolution as an emergent of the underlying processes that appear as 'stasis' I don't doubt people have tried to model out this process, can anyone direct me to this kinda stuff in Chaos Theory? (or I guess porridge starting to bubble etc,. it's all fascinating! :)
@spencerantoniomarlen-starr3069
@spencerantoniomarlen-starr3069 8 жыл бұрын
Highly related (they were close friends until Mandelbrot died) modern thinker is Nassim Nicholas Taleb, give him a Google and see where it takes you
@roofusonna1846
@roofusonna1846 7 жыл бұрын
Go to your local university and speak with a professor in the maths department. They should be able to give you some good reading material, or find you the details of a mathematician that can help you out.
@LimLux
@LimLux 3 жыл бұрын
I thought he said "clowns", but it was clouds. :)
@naimulhaq9626
@naimulhaq9626 3 жыл бұрын
How did eastern mystics could comprehend fractals, thousands of years ago? Indeed it was possible for them to meditate the origin of the universe from the high temperature big bang.
@Blaster1986
@Blaster1986 9 ай бұрын
Drugs.
@19n05k83
@19n05k83 9 жыл бұрын
Many say Charles Darwin "killed" god. No, these guys, chaos theorists, did.
@19n05k83
@19n05k83 9 жыл бұрын
***** I think that you are not so sure what chaos theory is. Science, especially chaos theory, tells us there is no plan and there is no design in nature. Fascism and communism were (and still are) political religions, a belief system as "traditional" religions. Physics does not give us accurate results, just a good aproximations, and Darwin did not reduced human life to materialistic theory (where did you find that idea anyway?).
@DorianEudesSeverin
@DorianEudesSeverin 8 жыл бұрын
+Nenad Kitanović It's a common misunderstanding of what Darwinism is because of Spencer's brand of "Social Darwinism". The social science got rid of the notion of evolution in the early 1900's, because their understanding of it is Spencerist; his "Social Darwinism" was nothing like Darwin's idea, but everybody keep calling it that, and mistake it for the real deal. Mistrust between social sciences and biology, or even worse, sociobiology and the rest of social science, stem from that initial misunderstanding.
@saheellodhia270
@saheellodhia270 7 жыл бұрын
Nenad Kitanović if anything to me Mandelbrot really gives me a glimpse of the concept of infinity of God. If finite mathematical concepts can describe infinity, how can God who is beyond space and time be understood.
@19n05k83
@19n05k83 7 жыл бұрын
Orange Flame Ok, but what God is that? Sure not one from the Old testament.
@saheellodhia270
@saheellodhia270 7 жыл бұрын
Nenad Kitanović obviously not...
Big Think Interview With Freeman Dyson | Big Think
38:38
Big Think
Рет қаралды 51 М.
Шокирующая Речь Выпускника 😳📽️@CarrolltonTexas
00:43
Глеб Рандалайнен
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Countries Treat the Heart of Palestine #countryballs
00:13
CountryZ
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Ну Лилит))) прода в онк: завидные котики
00:51
Benoit Mandelbrot: Fractals and the art of roughness
21:19
Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered? | Episode 409 | Closer To Truth
26:47
Arthur C Clarke - Fractals - The Colors Of Infinity
53:45
Jay C-101
Рет қаралды 572 М.
Fractals: a world in a grain of sand  | Ben Weiss | TEDxVeniceBeach
15:12
Edward Frenkel - Interview at Cirm
43:31
Centre International de Rencontres Mathématiques
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Fractals are typically not self-similar
21:36
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
The Mandelbrot Set: Atheists’ WORST Nightmare
38:25
Answers in Genesis
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Roger Penrose - Is Mathematics Invented or Discovered?
13:49
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
The complete FUN TO IMAGINE with Richard Feynman
1:06:50
Christopher Sykes
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН