so? that isnt the rule. the rule is you cant lift their hips above their head, not that their head cant go below their hips. its not about the result its about the intention. this is why the sport should have never gone pro.

@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger are you smoking something? its literally the rule! player taken past horizontal landed on his head and should have been a Red card

@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger bro u dumb haha he landed on his head dont matter if its intentional or not

@@PanicMechanic can you fk off with your pussy ass attitude. This is way we invented soccer, for soft kunts

@@PanicMechanic that’s not the tacklers fault you only get carded for that when you lift them past the horizontal this was just from the force of the tackle nothing wrong here

its because player went beyond Horizontal and landed on his head and neck, should have been a red

@@PanicMechanic bunch of pussies. Its rugby he got smoked with a legal tackle.

Agree. Also, looks like he had to put the receiver on side, which could explain holding on for a moment too long. Maybe that also explains why the receiver ran over to check on him (felt guilty). Poor form from the tackler though for just walking away when he was clearly hurt. Competitive contact sport aside, the professional guys do it if they know they've just murdered someone.

The timing and the arms around the body looks fine to me as well but the tackler has a duty of care to make sure that the ball handler isn't placed in a dangerous position. Looking at the video, kid went past the horizontal and landed on his head

@@terencegorogo1531 same as Courtney lawes v France at Twickenham few years ago and nothing happened to him. Tacklers force was to much for the opponent but that not the tackles fault. This is a rugby incident

Incredibly high wdym

How was it well timed if the guy didn’t have the ball he had already made the pass

@@Desi0519 he was already on his way - no way to stop the inevitable

Lols are you blind the ball left his hands ,. It's late

He was already in the air as the kid was passing lol you can't pull out of a tackle like that. Good hit.

should have been a red, went past horizontal and ended on his head

Bro he is paralyzed

Lol

It's a red card. He falls on his head first. The hit was legal but it's your responsibility to make he doesnt fall on his head first.

@@sirfrancis6058 only if you lift intentionally past the horizonal line. A hit like that is completely legal and just bad luck how he ended up.

@@boldbeam4534 100% correct

Edgy

this is in South Africa numb nut lol

Is the young guy ok?

bs

I bet the tackle made you think twice about going in, ayyy?? Lol

To be honest there's not much they can do? Just gotta wait for the medics. I think they were all still shocked by the tackle lol.

What could they do, that was a legal tackle so they couldn't start a fight ir ro anything

Slightly late on that tackle. For the very least needs to protect the player he's tackling. Takes opposition clean out, AFTER ball leaves opposition's hands. I'm a Boys High old boy. Trust me, you cant have this wrekless play in schoolboy rugby games. Mistakes can happen at this tempo, really bad mistakes.

@@five1steph I don’t think it’s late. Ball had only just left his hands and the player was already committed. I do agree that bad things can happen at this level of school boy which is why coaches shouldn’t select players this small as it is inevitable that they will get hurt if they are being tackled by guys twice the weight of them

Too small? Really? I recal someone telling a certain small guy from brackenfell he was too small to make it on the international stage ...

wrong, went past horizontal, should have been a red

Past horizontal straight red

He lands on his head maybe? He could have died?

@@Albusdumbledore840 then any tackle is dangerous. Go play soccer then. My comment was what the rules prescribed and proven correct.

Ok, he’s gone over the horizontal line so it’s illegal, any questions?

You don't know rugby. Full stop. It's a perfect tackle.​@@Albusdumbledore840

Wat fout is is al die snowflake kommentaar. 😂😂

M3th0d mah hy het nie en jou kennis van reels is verkeerd, dis n skoon tackle met niks fout nie monnas is mah net n meisie skiol dis al

Stfu...that tackle was an attemped murder

TheEddy797 neee jou nai. Di tackle was fine dis nog steeds ñ legal hit as di tackler se skouer an di hit oor di ander ou se skouer gly

@@brianfisher3470 jirre né die man heel bo is reg, die man is verby vertikaal getiep, jy weet mos nou dis illegal. En daai man wat getackle is, is poes toe. Hy kan maar net sowel die ou afstuur.

Bullshit if ever I've heard it. The tackler made contact below the should (legal) with so much force the ball carrier flipped. Late tackle again no he was committed. Easier for a referee to give a card rather than do his job. Lazy refereeing.

Pussy. Its rugby you know what you are getting into when you step on the field no matter your size

What a dumd ass comment.Maybe the little guy should play something else.Knob

dont play rugby if youre too small.

nothing tough about being that small and playing rugby. kid should work out and eat or play another sport. if he cant eat and train properly for the sport thats on him. Soccer is VERY popular in south africa. I'm sure there are other non contact sports at his school. The basic fact is that rugby is not a participation trophy sport. and its not a sport about picking on guys your own size. if you want fair weight matchups the kid should do boxing or wrestling. this is rugby. bigger stronger guys and smaller more agile guys compete against eachother to cause scores and prevent scores.

@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger do not tackle like if you are in the NFL

Not even a second

He hit him, before his team mate caught the ball & the pass was only about a metre wide,

Not even close. Not even one sec.

He had a coma

It’s the tacklers responsibility to make sure the other player doesn’t land on his head, past the horizontal line. That kid did a flip and landed on his neck. By the rules that’s a red card and a suspension.

It was a tad bit late

legal? so he goes past horizontal and lands first on head and neck? should have been a red

@@PanicMechanic you make absolutely no sense. Nothing in the technique of the tackle made the kid land on his head, it was the force. Are we gonna start telling kids to tackle softer now?

@@BeskuitenBroffie no, but you can see the intent to cause injury and that's playing the man not the ball and frankly not in the spirit of the game! Secondly it's all about technique chop! The technique use was to go higher than the hips and thus causing the issue of going through the horizontal. But hey clearly safety doesn't come first for you, maybe one day when your son gets hit like that and ends up paralyzed or potentially getting a life altering injury then you will be on the other side of the fence and bitch and moan then...

@@PanicMechanic it was a bigger player that hit a smaller player so hard that he went past the horizontal line. Perfect technique. The only way in which he could’ve safely landed in this situation was if he had tackled him softer. I hope that is not what you are suggesting, If so there is a sport with a round ball where pussies kick it into a net that you might enjoy watching.

@@TheBloodSportExpress First of all when you start with because one player is bigger than the other i already know you don't know the laws and you wont know how its applied either! Laws say nothing about player size only about player safety and that its the responsibilities of the tackling player! The only way to tackle is softer to prevent that? are you maybe blind? he had to go lower! its extremely close to being high so maybe go learn to read before getting but hurt over facts! no wonder you lot in SA complain about the refs so much, don't actually know the laws.

Legs went over the horizontal... Illegal. Should be red

@@luke515 are you dumb he had the ball when he was tackled it wasnt high think about that

@@luke515 thats not the rule. the rule is you cant lift the legs over the head. not that their head cant pass their hips and any time.

@@CCCSaxsonWarmonger go read the rule! besides how does the player go through the horizontal manage to land on his head first without being lifted off the ground! red card all the way home. The definition of horizontal is when your head goes past your hips and legs, have some common sense jeez

@@PanicMechanic it doesnt say you cant be lifted off the ground. it says the hips cant be lifted above the head. not the head cant go below the hips. the tackle that is illegal are when you spear their head into the ground, not when you hit them so hard they leave their feet.

Fair game to me.

Clearly dangerous

Rugbys a game for girls now days

Yep my response as well. Can the just as well delete rugby altotgether

​@@amatmc8319 pretty much by the looks of the snowflakes comments

player went beyond the horizontal and landed on his head

@@PanicMechanic if you lift someone past the horizontal then yes, but that guy just got tackled the shit out of him and his so small that he justed flipped

@@nicolaasmostert5577 that's the reason why he went past the horizontal! laws make no provision for how a player gets lifted and includes not directly lifting the player straight up first (this would be the "Tip" tackle which is different these are also know as the spearing of a player or dunking which are generally the easiest to give straight reds) In this case the players feet go over his head meaning he had to go beyond the horizontal and also means player had to be lifted, which then makes its the tackling players responsibility for safety and reason for the card

Landed on his head. He literally cartwheel'd him bruh

Horrible tackle, go to NFL if you want to do that

@@martinjugolin2087 what's wrong with the tackle?

@@tsaki_titan too high, he launched himself at him without proper grappling and technique, no control

@@martinjugolin2087 too high??!😳it's like you don't know rugby rules, that was just a dangerous tackle without anything wrong with the tackler. The tackler is probably 90+kg against a scrum half, of course he's gonna fucking kill that kid cause he came at speed, the tackle was just wrekcless but he did everything right. Are you from the northern hemisphere?

I was next to the field that day, he was 100% committed to the tackle. Nothing wrong with the tackle, was below his shoulders. If you cant take a tackle dont play rugby

@@nicolaasmostert5577 As I said, he knew he wasn't going to make the tackle on time, whether he was committed or not. It's not about being able to take a tackle Mr tough guy.....

@@nicolaasmostert5577 ok so the guy dies with a broken neck then tell his family that....easy when you are not in that position

Ag jirre gaan huil iewers ander🖕

Don't play it then. There is risk of serious injury in rock climbing.

then play another. thats what makes this fun. thats like saying theres too much risk in MMA or rock climbing. yes, thats what this game is about, thats what makes it fun.

@@delailama736 lol i didnt even see your comment when i first mentioned rock climbing lol

So playing a sport to 100% of your abilities are unsportsmanlike?. Wow. . Who would have thought.

@@martinwolmarans1833 your ability to play this sport is not measured by how hard you hit someone. He could’ve still been perfect without trying to kill him.

If you pause the video at the right time you’ll see that he does wrap his arms. It was a bigger player that hit a smaller player with so much force that he got flipped. He did not pick him up and dunk him. The only way to have put him dow safely in this situation would’ve been to tackle him softer.

Ninjas Nelt hulle het gese die tackle was laat. Maar die laaitie maak gereeld groot tackles

@@paulbasson2441 oooo jitte maar wat is sy naam

Ninjas Nelt dis Divan of so iets

@@rheinieconel342 divan fuller

Want hierdie is `n sport, nie `n veldslag nie. Dit was `n kleinerige mannetjie daai, hy moes homself bietjie ingeperk het. Redelike hoog gevat - jy tackle `n man se bene - nie sy bolyf nie. As sy bors te naby is aan die grond vir jou? Wel dalk is hy `n laaitjie in vergelyking met jou. Dit was uiters gevaarlik - dis nie `n geval van "all gloves are off" nie.

Jys n soutie bra

@@strannik7693 jy is die oorspronklike soutie

Jys fokken blind

plenty wrong with it

There was no shoulder to the neck

No it was under a second chom

Landed on his head, over the horizontal. Dangerous tackle, red

Ek verstaan ook nie seker omdat hy op sy nek geland het

@@JahTheOne9 it wasn’t a lift. The force of the tackle on a smaller player is what turned him. Nothing the player could have done differently in his technique except not hit him as hard. Not dangerous play. We shouldn’t penalize the player for being physical. We should question the coach why he selected someone who clearly isn’t physically ready to play at that level

@@megatom210 this is the truth

@@megatom210 Doesnt have to be a lift! its at any time that the tackled player goes past the horizontal! people need to go read the laws. Rules are there for a reason! easy to say that shouldn't penalize that player for being physical yet could have broken someone's neck by being reckless, yes it was reckless

read the laws about tackling a player first then come back and comment

@@PanicMechanic ok Brandon! I will go right now and read the great and almighty tackling law book and be right back to comment 👍

@@siunipataiseni5932 good stuff hopefully you learn something.... Actually who we kidding here you too full of it to admit that you are wrong 🤣

@@PanicMechanic was that you that got smashed!!! 😭 are you playing soccer now 👨‍💻

@@siunipataiseni5932 hahaha yeah I thought I would be right... Maybe should go back to school to ask for a refund because you still can't read

It's not a late tackle

Verrry late? Not sure if you can count one second and subtract from that?? Probably not

Dont play opens if your scared of being hit by big guys. Theres no rules around size, what you want the bigger guys to do, let the small fast guys run around them? Big guys have to play to their strengths, using their size, small guys their agility and speed. Nothing wrong with that hit. Imagine you switch the 2 players and small guy destroys big guy, how come thats fine now? Doesn't make sense.

@@amatmc8319 This isnt opens ! what makes you believe that its opens? clearly in the video description that its u/14 or cant you read just like you cant read the rugby law books about whats a fair tackle and that taking someone beyond the horizontal and them ending on their head first is illegal

@@amatmc8319 not just the description but in the video itself it shows u/14!

nah. youre a pussy

@@kevinflynn9715 Forget your personal hang ups for a moment Kevin. Rugby is just a game and the rules are the rules. In this instance the balls long gone, so the tackle is late. The tackler has no control over the player once he launches into the tackle, so it’s reckless.

@@MrRhythmicnodding yeah i just dont think a half second is long gone.

@@MrRhythmicnodding i agree with kevin you sound like a pussy. Its rugby you get hit hard. Ball had just left his hands.

@@amatmc8319 “it’s rugby you get hit hard” absolutely Mitchell, that’s why the rules are there to keep players safe and the game fair. Nothing better in rugby than a tough hard hit well timed and within the rules of the game. Nothing worse in rugby than illegal play that endangers others, and someone on the sideline shouting pussy at people. I can understand you saying the tackle was only a fraction late, but that is unfortunately still late.

Dan ken jy nie rugby nie

@@Zy-xt7wy gaan kyk die video oor en pause waar hy tackle,eerstens vat hy hom net net onder sy arms,tweedens was sy bene oor 360th grade,jy ken ni

@@taztrellis2914 my chom jy reply nou eers?

@@Zy-xt7wy want ek kyk nou eers die comments

@@taztrellis2914 Wat is vout met net inder sy arms?

Apparently balet is your sport then. Or lawn bowls. One of the two