No video

Binding Energy - A-level Physics

  Рет қаралды 168,870

Science Shorts

Science Shorts

Күн бұрын

scienceshorts.net Please don't forget to leave a like if you found this helpful!
------------------------------------
00:00 Relative atomic mass unit
02:23 Mass defect
03:55 Binding energy
06:49 Fission & fusion
09:05 Binding energy per nucleon -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't charge anyone to watch my videos, so please donate if you can to keep me going! bit.ly/scienceshortsdonate

Пікірлер: 174
@davidasquith110
@davidasquith110 5 жыл бұрын
My school no longer has any qualified physics teachers to teach us a level, this helps me so much
@jawg2898
@jawg2898 3 жыл бұрын
lol same
@danialw704
@danialw704 3 жыл бұрын
same lmao
@user-ro6mv8qg1q
@user-ro6mv8qg1q 3 жыл бұрын
you guys must be in the same school
@sonic_liam3169
@sonic_liam3169 Жыл бұрын
same here! We had 2 teachers, the 2nd one left in jan, nothing the new teachers have taught us has gone in for me, these videos have been a lifesaver
@mohammadhasibemran5955
@mohammadhasibemran5955 Жыл бұрын
which country?
@mehdi_1o144
@mehdi_1o144 6 жыл бұрын
god bless this man
@harrydavies6531
@harrydavies6531 2 жыл бұрын
Amen
@Lazorkite
@Lazorkite 2 жыл бұрын
For real !!
@omgsolitude
@omgsolitude Жыл бұрын
real
@puddleduck1405
@puddleduck1405 Жыл бұрын
Amen!!
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 6 жыл бұрын
6:37 Spot the mistake! To turn MeV into Joules, you MULTIPLY by 1.6x10^-13.
@flyingdutchman109
@flyingdutchman109 6 жыл бұрын
I have been taught that to turn MeV into joules you multiply by 1.6x10^-19???
@spag5296
@spag5296 6 жыл бұрын
Thats eV. MeV if you want to go about it that way, is multiply by 1.6 x 10^-19 *then* multiply by 10^6
@flynnmusson5909
@flynnmusson5909 6 жыл бұрын
Callum Paton excuse me this is a class room no swearing 😡😡
@farutv2857
@farutv2857 4 жыл бұрын
he is correct it is suppose to be 10^13 because its to MeV which means you need t multiply the 10^-19 by 10^6 to change the eV into MeV you made a mistake identifying MeV and eV
@leonardowilhelmdicaprio999
@leonardowilhelmdicaprio999 3 жыл бұрын
1 M = 1x10^6 1 MeV = (1 x 10^6) X (1.6 X 10^-19) = 1.6 X 10^-13 J
@edforever6299
@edforever6299 2 жыл бұрын
never learnt about that last point on helium being unusually stable, really helpful making notes on these videos in the week running up to the exam, thanks!
@trajectory1483
@trajectory1483 2 жыл бұрын
you revised a week before? maybe I should have, oh well, good luck!
@jasonwiley798
@jasonwiley798 3 ай бұрын
Three nucleons contribitung binding force but only one nucleon contributing em repulsive force. That ratio does not exist in any other isotopes. Tritium maybe 2:0.
@Boofy011
@Boofy011 5 жыл бұрын
It would really be much more convenient if it was called separation energy
@dog8484
@dog8484 5 жыл бұрын
no
@franc1159
@franc1159 5 жыл бұрын
It would man, it really would make things easier to understand
@joshuaosei5628
@joshuaosei5628 4 жыл бұрын
I get you, but its the energy that's being used to literally bind the nucleus together. In order to seperate it, think of the energy putting into it as though you're "paying the nucleus" the energy back that likes to have from being bound together, so that each nucleon is satisfied after.
@offthecameraroll
@offthecameraroll 6 жыл бұрын
the econplusdal of physics
@sairemkhan5589
@sairemkhan5589 5 жыл бұрын
I swearrr
@sairemkhan5589
@sairemkhan5589 5 жыл бұрын
But dal is the king
@asherrevises8601
@asherrevises8601 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. you singlehandedly saved my grades
@samuelmcdonagh1590
@samuelmcdonagh1590 5 жыл бұрын
I really like your channel, your videos are my go to choice for consolidation after lessons, and I actively look for your thumbnails in the search results. They seem thoughtfully planned out, and they’re pleasant to watch and understand. You neatly cover the course content without expending unnecessary time, and you remain professional throughout (if we overlook the “BIG D” reference hehe). I’m sure I speak for everyone when I say that your channel is more than just a hobby or side business, but an outpost for aspiring physicists.
@sofiatrojanovich4413
@sofiatrojanovich4413 4 жыл бұрын
this is the most helpful physics video i've watched through my entire course - thank you so much
@vikram785
@vikram785 3 жыл бұрын
I am doing a research project at school on how nuclear reactors work, and this video helped so much to explain binding energy, mass defect and how this all relates to fission. Thank you so much!!!
@dulapiip
@dulapiip 5 жыл бұрын
*IT'S DAY 05 & UR VIDS ARE STILL HELPING ME IN UNIT 5, ALSO UNIT 4 WENT ALRIGHT ALL THANKS YO YOU, THANK YOU AGAIN GOOD SIR*
@crazyanimal2211
@crazyanimal2211 5 жыл бұрын
yikes this video is bright. still fantastic content though ;)
@dearlantsov
@dearlantsov 2 жыл бұрын
5:55 in the edexcel book, 1u=931.5 MeV, really small difference lmao but just thought i'd mention it
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 2 жыл бұрын
Yep, they changed it a few years ago!
@vdabest2118
@vdabest2118 4 жыл бұрын
Why do I keep getting ads of “ A level Physics online” on “ Science Shorts” 😂😂😂
@eatingpoo203
@eatingpoo203 2 жыл бұрын
Thank god for this video, got an A level exam tomorrow and I needed this.
@hani8133
@hani8133 5 жыл бұрын
Excellent video sir. Please carry on making more videos and you have all our support!
@hankmoody9023
@hankmoody9023 5 жыл бұрын
such a concise video! thank you so much for the help! please make more videos :)
@24-7Pain
@24-7Pain 6 жыл бұрын
So so so so so helpful, you're a god, thank you so much
@nahsee-zq6vg
@nahsee-zq6vg 2 ай бұрын
this is such a good explanation, thank you!
@talhapatel2233
@talhapatel2233 7 жыл бұрын
Really helpful and you actually explain pretty well, just wish you had more videos. And past paper solutions.
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 7 жыл бұрын
+Talha Taylor Thanks :) Past paper solutions is something what I am considering doing next. 52 videos isn't enough?! xD
@talhapatel2233
@talhapatel2233 7 жыл бұрын
lol....for nuclear physics. and you have nothing for medical physics. :(
@KDAK
@KDAK 7 жыл бұрын
medical physics would be lovely! sitting that with wjec
@charlespryke3869
@charlespryke3869 7 жыл бұрын
I need me some medical physics vids pleaseeee
@magqaga
@magqaga 5 ай бұрын
What a good introduction of Binding Energy
@ayeshashaikh4433
@ayeshashaikh4433 3 жыл бұрын
thank you really for making these, you are saving my grades dude
@ThomasSun-xw3ux
@ThomasSun-xw3ux 4 ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@jesur8888
@jesur8888 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this well done video! I’m not sure if it was covered but how do you calculate the potential energy between two points with a known mass number? Could you point me to a resource as well? Thank you!!
@jessicaq.1224
@jessicaq.1224 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your amazing videos, they are very helpful! I am confused about the steps in the process of mass defect. Because of the electrostatic repulsion between protons in the nucleus of an atom, there is a strong nuclear force which holds the nucleons in place. Firstly, where does this strong nuclear force come from? Is it generated by the neutrons? And why does the strong nuclear force cause a loss of the mass of protons and neutrons? How is the energy released related to this force? Does the strong nuclear force hold the protons and neutrons only, or their quarks as well? Also, how is binding energy related to all of this? Thanks again
@paulwilson6886
@paulwilson6886 5 жыл бұрын
Very clear - thanks!
@marxregis
@marxregis 5 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation sir!
@shahadamjad3691
@shahadamjad3691 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much for your amazing content!
@lizzyphilips492
@lizzyphilips492 6 жыл бұрын
There should be a heart option for such amazing videos!! THANKS
@freefalling4271
@freefalling4271 5 жыл бұрын
Ok. This is the part I'm constantly confused about. If total BE increased, then wouldn't that mean that mass is gained rather than lost (mass-energy equivalence)? Or is there something I'm misunderstanding?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 5 жыл бұрын
Binding energy is a bit of a misnomer - it's a 'negative' energy; the energy needed to get out of the potential 'well'. If you roll down a hill, we can say that your climbing energy has increased, because it's now going to take more to get to the top again. Same idea.
@freefalling4271
@freefalling4271 5 жыл бұрын
Science Shorts ah that makes a lot of sense now, thanks a lot.
@jasonwiley798
@jasonwiley798 3 ай бұрын
​@@ScienceShortsI prefer to call it binding force, because it is the force that hds the protons and neutrons togethet in thenucleis. Otherwise known as the residual strong force, which I consider to be a misnomer.
@aliaaatta8498
@aliaaatta8498 5 жыл бұрын
.we are doing a mock paper 2 and I'm much confident on it now thanks for ur amazing videos.dont know what I would have done without them.i got a question : is the binding energy the energy needed to overcome the strong nuclear force between the nucleons from 0.5 fm to 4 fm (because it is attractive )and the rest of the energy is provided by the electrostatic force between protons to pull them apart?
@RAFAELSILVA-by6dy
@RAFAELSILVA-by6dy 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@ahussain6255
@ahussain6255 4 жыл бұрын
i love you for making this video
@mollyb7367
@mollyb7367 5 жыл бұрын
You sir are a legend
@M7RAA
@M7RAA 2 ай бұрын
thank you
@Aryansh
@Aryansh 5 жыл бұрын
Thankx bro
@abbieedwards685
@abbieedwards685 6 жыл бұрын
Great video however U-238 isn't a fissile isotope of uranium. A better example would have been U-235, which is fissile.
@user-tz6gj1vt9u
@user-tz6gj1vt9u 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😭💜💜
@abdulkarimalburayh5807
@abdulkarimalburayh5807 3 жыл бұрын
wonderful!
@majedmohammed6519
@majedmohammed6519 5 жыл бұрын
I thought that when we convert U to MeV we multiply by (933.75) which rounds to (934) .. atleast that's in the CIE syllabus. We calculate by using E=mc^2 . So E=(1.66x10^-27)(3x10^8)^2 . while U is the atomic mass unit. Then we Get the answer as 1.494x10^-19 (J). Then we divide by (1.6x10^-19) to get (933.75x10^6 eV) which is (933.75) MeV which rounds to (934) MeV
@fatmafaizal07
@fatmafaizal07 5 жыл бұрын
Hello, have you uploaded a video on Medical Imaging?
@folbfolb
@folbfolb 3 жыл бұрын
Have u considered doing these videos for A level chemistry
@silviamomanyi4169
@silviamomanyi4169 3 жыл бұрын
Am ready for tomorrow's exam☺️...thank you so much
@khadijaway
@khadijaway 3 жыл бұрын
I'm giving you a huge thuumb. Amazing sir Thank you 😌
@lukeflipzz4319
@lukeflipzz4319 3 жыл бұрын
great video
@muskaanmemon8475
@muskaanmemon8475 6 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained, thank you! Can you cover the Medical Physics section and Telecommunications for A level physics as well?
@ZAsym
@ZAsym 2 жыл бұрын
thanks!!
@lhtj-vj2gd
@lhtj-vj2gd 2 жыл бұрын
do we calculate mass defect the with the same formula in nuclear fission and fusion reaction?
@gw7223
@gw7223 5 жыл бұрын
Ohhh this makes so much sense
@7490maddie
@7490maddie 5 жыл бұрын
Thank yooouuuuuuu
@zedvance6205
@zedvance6205 3 жыл бұрын
great video :)
@Andrea-es5te
@Andrea-es5te 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro
@babyoda1973
@babyoda1973 2 жыл бұрын
I love it it help me teach my daughter
@benfallon3295
@benfallon3295 2 жыл бұрын
what is stopping everything from tending to Fe56 if thats the most stable nuclei
@wildeofthewest
@wildeofthewest 2 жыл бұрын
So the energy released in fission/fusion is equal to the increase in binding energy?
@jellybabiesarecool4657
@jellybabiesarecool4657 4 жыл бұрын
I feel big brain when watching these videos.
@earl8590
@earl8590 Жыл бұрын
at 7:40 can someone explain why the binding energy goes up after uranium decays? - for anyone who needs this is how i understand it during fission energy is released from the system during the decay and to separate the atoms into its base nucleons, that energy will need to be put back in on top of what u already need. as binding energy is the energy used to separate them, it increases the mass decreases due to equation -> binding E = calculated mass - actual mass so an increase in binding E would be caused by a decrease in actual mass - as mass and energy are interchangeable
@a.muhyee4156
@a.muhyee4156 2 ай бұрын
Thank you
@earl8590
@earl8590 2 ай бұрын
@@a.muhyee4156 gl bruthal i ended up getting an A with me consistently getting Cs so dont underestimate urself
@Real_Alien
@Real_Alien 2 жыл бұрын
This guy is better than Einstein
@camdento6721
@camdento6721 2 жыл бұрын
Why does binding energy increase going from heavy to light Or going from light to heavy?
@AlexUnder_BR
@AlexUnder_BR 11 ай бұрын
Theres is any website or app that allow us to produce an spherical representarion of what that MeV energy would look like? 🤔
@jarrydvrcic9959
@jarrydvrcic9959 3 жыл бұрын
Why does the total binding energy increase in fission?
@jas4768
@jas4768 6 жыл бұрын
Does the binding energy include the energy required to reduce the potential of the nucleon to 0, from the strong force?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 6 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@jas4768
@jas4768 6 жыл бұрын
Also sir... How does the difference in binding energies of the nuclei in a fission reaction give us the energy given out? Eg Binding energy of Uranium- 1739MeV splits into Rb and Cs Binding energy of Rb and Cs= 1957.6MeV How is it that 1957.6-1739 gives us the energy released during fission?
@hasan7241
@hasan7241 2 жыл бұрын
Why does the neutrons and protons come together by using energy up but when it comes to seperating we have to put energy in ? Cant they use even more energy up to seperate and the mass decreases even further
@amidaleahmad1324
@amidaleahmad1324 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your lecture that made me sure for my knowlage was correct but I was not fulent now I am . 👌👌👌😍😍
@soulesswanderer2452
@soulesswanderer2452 3 жыл бұрын
this is interliantful
@rishistavray3622
@rishistavray3622 5 жыл бұрын
God bless u
@dandan321321321
@dandan321321321 5 жыл бұрын
He sounds like professor X, the young version.
@MuhammadAfzal-tk9xl
@MuhammadAfzal-tk9xl 4 жыл бұрын
Why do we take C12 atom to calculate atomic masses when FE56 is the most stable element in the periodic table???
@JassaTableTennis
@JassaTableTennis 5 жыл бұрын
in aqa 1u is 931.5?
@Mozzie7920
@Mozzie7920 3 жыл бұрын
7:39, am I right in saying that the total binding energy increases because the total energy in the system has decreased so now it takes more energy to separate the constituent parts? If not then I’m a bit confused on why the total binding energy increases Edit: just seen the fusion bit now as well and my point above wouldn’t work for it so I’m confused on how total binding energy increases for both fission and fusion
@Y4red
@Y4red 2 жыл бұрын
do u understand it now i need help
@earl8590
@earl8590 Жыл бұрын
brutha ik it prolly doesnt matter anymore an i hope it all worked out for u - the way i understand it is that during fission energy is released from the system during the decay and to separate the atoms into its base nucleons that energy will need to be put back in on top of what u already need and as binding energy is the energy used to separate them, it increases
@MikeDu-it9wl
@MikeDu-it9wl 5 жыл бұрын
Does that mean that the whole universe will finally become a bulk of iron, which is the most stable state?
@michaelschwartz9485
@michaelschwartz9485 11 ай бұрын
I had a hard time understanding something and after watching this video I get it! Thank you very much, love your channel.
@jasonwiley798
@jasonwiley798 3 ай бұрын
Does He-2 exist in nature ? If so, it would mean that the binding force between to nucleons is greater than the em repulsive force between protons.
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 3 ай бұрын
Nope!
@teyneyto
@teyneyto 4 жыл бұрын
I understand how mass is lost during fission but I'm confused on how the mass is lost during fusion
@Ben-vg6ox
@Ben-vg6ox 3 жыл бұрын
I wish I found your channel sooner
@vapel5038
@vapel5038 6 жыл бұрын
shouldn't there be less binding energy after fission, since you have less nuclei bound together?
@lf7857
@lf7857 6 жыл бұрын
Binding energy is the energy need to separate or 'unbind' the nucleus. The release of energy in fission creates more stable nuclei, so the total binding energy increases (as the new nuclei are 'harder to unbind'). Hope this helps
@louistheodorou4290
@louistheodorou4290 5 жыл бұрын
L F thank you, I didn’t understand that either
@artinllazani4754
@artinllazani4754 8 ай бұрын
@@lf7857 Thank you to this day
@Josh-fc6sx
@Josh-fc6sx 4 ай бұрын
Just noticed your bleeding finger, hope you're okay 7 years later 😭
@gw7223
@gw7223 5 жыл бұрын
I’m cramming lol
@ayushadhikari3352
@ayushadhikari3352 2 жыл бұрын
Love yah♥️
@jonathannogushi5325
@jonathannogushi5325 6 жыл бұрын
6:37 I thought you Times by 1.6x^-13 to convert to joules but you said divide plz correct me if I'm wrong
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 6 жыл бұрын
Yeahhh :(
@oskarwitha_k8258
@oskarwitha_k8258 2 жыл бұрын
6:45 you said that we are given it in formula booklet but in the formula booklet we are given 1u to kg. how do we get from that to 931.3
@7p7m7
@7p7m7 2 жыл бұрын
Underneath it says its equivalent in MeV
@ZMDD2017
@ZMDD2017 2 жыл бұрын
the voice is kinda makin me feel like im being lectured by Bradley James
@BaBababa-hy6vv
@BaBababa-hy6vv 2 жыл бұрын
Some resources don't include electron and some includes it, I'm confused now. We are talking about the nucleus right? Therefore electron is excluded?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 2 жыл бұрын
Depends on whether the question is regarding an atom or just nucleus. It's usually the latter.
@tazmaniac1991
@tazmaniac1991 6 жыл бұрын
Why does the binding energy increase if energy is released?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 6 жыл бұрын
+Tania Remember that binding energy is almost like 'negative' energy - it's the energy needed to 'unbind' the nucleus. Therefore, if energy is released, that must mean that the particles are now in a power energy state, meaning that it will now take more energy to break them apart. So that means binding energy has is increased :)
@SadiqunhnabiChoudhury
@SadiqunhnabiChoudhury 4 жыл бұрын
When we talk about the mass of an atom, dont we just consider the protons and neutrons, why have you added the u value of electron?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 4 жыл бұрын
Sometimes a question will ask you to take into account the mass of electrons, sometimes they won't.
@MONA-im3uq
@MONA-im3uq 2 жыл бұрын
Is this in As level syllabus?
@namename3130
@namename3130 2 жыл бұрын
'Before using unlearn i was stuck on Cs eXspecially in economics'
@amro_khleifat
@amro_khleifat 4 ай бұрын
In my book , u=931.5 mev c-² , to find the equivalent energy in mev multiply by c² , but u didn't multiply by c²
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 4 ай бұрын
It's confusing when they write it like that, no doubt. By writing the unit like this, this is essentially saying that this is the mass in MeV. To make it clear: mc2 = 931.5MeV, so that means m=931.5MeV/c2
@bencates986
@bencates986 2 ай бұрын
Sorted
@mikehanzmariano790
@mikehanzmariano790 3 жыл бұрын
i feel like im in heaven.... .the light is too much hehe.....btw this is helpful
@protestant6258
@protestant6258 5 жыл бұрын
Can you explain how did E = mc(square) has been came up?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 5 жыл бұрын
It's an application of the relativistic energy equation (basically an equation which tells you the *total* energy something has), subtracting the kinetic energy. This leaves you with rest energy.
@Mahar4ja
@Mahar4ja 4 жыл бұрын
Why are helium nuclei unusually stable for their number of nucleons?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 4 жыл бұрын
It's because they are as closely packed together as nucleons can be - every nucleon is touching the other 3.
@Mahar4ja
@Mahar4ja 4 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceShorts what about deuterium or tritium? A proton and neutron, and a proton and 2 neutrons respectively they should all be in significant contact. Is it because each particle has its own individual attractive and repulsive forces hence you want to maximise particles at the point they are all touching? In that case would deuterium and tritium be right below the helium nucleus in the graph?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 4 жыл бұрын
They're all touching, but they're not touching as many nucleons, so lower binding energy.
@amtheman2000
@amtheman2000 6 жыл бұрын
i thought to get u to mev it was times by 931.5 not 931.3 :/
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 6 жыл бұрын
Depends who you ask - it's even changed in the formula sheets the last few years. Check with yours in the exam.
@amtheman2000
@amtheman2000 6 жыл бұрын
yh just checked on the first page of aqa it says under u that its equivelent to 931,5. thx
@joshvir262
@joshvir262 5 жыл бұрын
Less than 2hrs before exam
@lallib.3968
@lallib.3968 5 жыл бұрын
Empire joshvir262 same
@fredkirk7881
@fredkirk7881 3 жыл бұрын
931.5
@JC-lu4se
@JC-lu4se 3 жыл бұрын
U238 fissions, does it?
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 3 жыл бұрын
Nope - 235. I lied.
@JC-lu4se
@JC-lu4se 3 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceShorts We all lie a little. Good video BTW.
@namename3130
@namename3130 2 жыл бұрын
Physics isnt helping itself as a field of study when it does things like defining binging energy as the energy required to sepparate. It serves no purpose to define it that way round and just makes the subject harder to learn.
@rj23032
@rj23032 Жыл бұрын
Lighting
@tiger-tet8701
@tiger-tet8701 4 жыл бұрын
the book says that 1u=931.5 not 931.3
@ScienceShorts
@ScienceShorts 4 жыл бұрын
Used to be 931.3.
Fission & Fusion - GCSE & A-level Physics (full version)
10:21
Science Shorts
Рет қаралды 99 М.
Joker can't swim!#joker #shorts
00:46
Untitled Joker
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
A teacher captured the cutest moment at the nursery #shorts
00:33
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 60 МЛН
لااا! هذه البرتقالة مزعجة جدًا #قصير
00:15
One More Arabic
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
😳 Все русские уже знают итальянский?🇮🇹
00:15
Nuclear Radius & Alpha Scattering - A-level Physics
5:32
Science Shorts
Рет қаралды 59 М.
Binding energy graph | Nuclei | Physics | Khan Academy
11:50
Khan Academy India - English
Рет қаралды 72 М.
Element 43 shouldn't be radioactive
6:18
ASK.
Рет қаралды 240 М.
Photoelectric Effect - A-level Physics
9:39
Science Shorts
Рет қаралды 407 М.
Nuclear fusion | Physics | Khan Academy
13:45
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Nuclear Reactions, Radioactivity, Fission and Fusion
14:12
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 823 М.
Joker can't swim!#joker #shorts
00:46
Untitled Joker
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН