The US Air Force is the biggest in the world. But still not big enough.

  Рет қаралды 83,451

Binkov's Battlegrounds

Binkov's Battlegrounds

Күн бұрын

Click this link to make some cash for giving your opinion! www.inflcr.co/SHKPu Thanks YouGov for sponsoring!
This video takes a look at what planes the US Air Force has today and what makes it the biggest air force in the world. It will explore aircraft in development that are to join the arsenal in the near future. And it will also analyze some issues that beset the Air Force, which might lower all those paper fleet numbers in an an actual battle.
00:00 Intro to topic
01:42 Numbers
07:10 Aircraft age
09:20 Aircraft availability
12:24 The future
Links to mentioned videos:
US Air Force is losing its tech edge (over China): • US Air Force is losing...
Sentinel is a $100 billion US nuclear missile. And 100 billion may not be enough: • Sentinel is a $100 bil...
B-21 Raider bomber is all about even more damage dealt (to China): • B-21 Raider bomber is ...
US 6th generation fighter is closer than you think: • US 6th generation figh...
USAF is rushing NGAD's drone fighter jets into service: • USAF is rushing NGAD's...
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
Get the Binkov plushie here: crowdmade.com/collections/bin...
You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

Пікірлер: 1 200
@Binkov
@Binkov 6 күн бұрын
Hope you guys liked the video! I love using YouGov to make easy cash! Click my link: www.inflcr.co/SHKPu #YouGovPartner
@TechnoPip
@TechnoPip 6 күн бұрын
Link doesn't seem to work
@boriskerelman2756
@boriskerelman2756 6 күн бұрын
link dont work
@Michael_Brock
@Michael_Brock 6 күн бұрын
Frag. Off the US has 3 of the most powerful air forces in the world. Me UK saying this . USAF #1. US naval assets. #2. PRC all assets #3. Can they pull together?. US reserves can these pull together?
@tusk3260
@tusk3260 6 күн бұрын
Air force based militaries like the US is outdated militaries. The war in Ukraine made this obvious. Modern militaries use air force as support like artillery as. They cant use them offensively because they are easy to shoot down with modern anti air missiles. Those missiles are much cheaper of those planes.
@SirBedevereTheWise
@SirBedevereTheWise 6 күн бұрын
I'd like to make a correction for you... The US Air Force's next largest competitor is the US Navy, not China 🤷🏼‍♂️
@christianpatton9364
@christianpatton9364 5 күн бұрын
If the US is seriously worried about numbers they can keep producing the F15EX , block 70 F16 and block 3 super hornet.These are fine for most missions after the stealth and drone forces have whittled down the small top tier forces most potential opponents possess or for the majority of recent situations where the US was fighting opposition with no serious aerospace capability.
@TheBigExclusive
@TheBigExclusive 5 күн бұрын
Stop it! You make too much sense!
@mingming9604
@mingming9604 3 күн бұрын
Or just make lots of lots of cheap drones!
@Omiicron
@Omiicron 5 күн бұрын
Worth noting that between F16s and F35s alone, the US produces ~250 per year. Lot's of these are for export, but they maintain F16 production because it's simple to manufacture, they can ramp it up approximately 400% for the F16 without needing additional floor space, just more manpower from an extensive pool of trained aerospace technicians/engineers. Always consider the defence industrial base, as it is key to the overall strategic plan for the united states in having the ability to not only supply itself, but almost any of its allies should the need arise.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 5 күн бұрын
中国每年生产更多的j20和j16,只是中国目前没有全球部署的必要所以没有继续扩大产能,中国的军费发展是比较健康的模式,每年军费只占gdp的百分之1.3
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 5 күн бұрын
还有美国军工有大概百分之40的原材料依赖中国提供,镓,以及各种元器件
@theemperorofmankind3739
@theemperorofmankind3739 3 күн бұрын
@@user-yw8zm9wn7l You cannot compare military expenditure directly as a percentage of GDP, since nations do not count the same thing as military expenditure. For example China's military budget does not count Nuclear, Maritime Militia, Homeland air defense, Coast Guard and few other segments. While the US does in its lump sum expenditure. Not a knock against China, just different systems.
@LinkoofHyrule
@LinkoofHyrule 6 күн бұрын
U.S. air force strength is the fact that it is so large that peer adversaries don't bother to try and compete seriously, hence focus on anti-AD and ground attack rather than fighter combat.
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 6 күн бұрын
That’s a good point. I think Russia has more of a fighter combat focus, so even when they have air superiority they kind of struggle to exploit it.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@deriznohappehquite The problem with the Russian Air Force is lack of funding.
@iivin4233
@iivin4233 6 күн бұрын
There's also the fact that every military has competing individuals and parties within it that cause seemingly irrational decisions. So there might be a lot of solid strategy behind the way militaries compete with asymmetric threats, but there is also a chance that someone important just likes having a big radar or a fancy plane, regardless of their utility. Like the US acts like it has the money to buy the best everything, for example. In a way this is brute forcing problem of what to procure. Secretly, procurers cut corners where they have to. And the corruption and costs that remain unaddressed have consequences. Beneficial civilian projects and programs could be attempted if so much wasn't spent on pure military dominance. The US might be suffering the consequences of these civilian sacrifices as well as it's moral sacrifices in the eyes of its people and the world. Things to think about.
@iamscoutstfu
@iamscoutstfu 6 күн бұрын
Even those strategies are useless against the modern USAF. They are not reasonable counters to the integrated warfare approach
@jayclean5653
@jayclean5653 5 күн бұрын
​@@user-wr8sm6jp6jThe problem with Russia is the Russians themselves.
@MacDaddy8200
@MacDaddy8200 6 күн бұрын
The US NAVY is the second largest "Airforce" in the world i think US will be okay.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
It was true before 2018, but obviously not now.
@thebrain7441
@thebrain7441 6 күн бұрын
Still not a reason to let our guard down.
@Seastallion
@Seastallion 4 күн бұрын
One factor not mentioned is the difference between pilot training in the US vs China. China's pilots are less trained with fewer hours of flight time. In a conflict scenario, US superior training combined with superior airframes and numbers would quickly shrink China's numbers through attrition. China's inexperience with military matters in general is a serious hurdle for them. They effectively don't even have any aircraft carriers, the first one they bought was unfinished and serving as a casino when they bought it, and the 2nd carrier is a clone of that one. Their 3rd carrier isn't operational and is really just a test platform, not a functional threat.
@casbot71
@casbot71 3 күн бұрын
That is alsob why China has been trying to get retired Western airforce pilots to train their forces.
@Seastallion
@Seastallion 3 күн бұрын
@@casbot71 First, I consider such people traitors, but even that is only a limited fix. That's not enough to compete against an entire military already invested with such training for more than half a century in short order. The limited number of pilots getting such training will only marginally improve China's capabilities. They still don't have the hardware assets to fully utilize some of the more advanced methods of training they would need to compete more evenly.
@eliteevildarkness5830
@eliteevildarkness5830 6 күн бұрын
US Airforce 's biggest competitor is US Navy
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
This was the case in the past, but it is obviously not the case now. The US Marine Corps and Navy have only over 100 fifth-generation fighters, and the F/A18EF has only over 400. This number can only be said to be stronger than Russia.
@Maverick-ur2vp
@Maverick-ur2vp 6 күн бұрын
Can we stop this crap in 2024? It's definitely not the case if you watched the video.
@paulsteven4551
@paulsteven4551 6 күн бұрын
US military total is larger the russia & china combined. but nothing is in isolation. US allies Japan, South Korea, France & UK combined would be 2nd. A better comparison would be comparing actual alliances & what each member brings.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@paulsteven4551 ? America's allies? Let me help you calculate the equipment and quantity of your allies🤣
@andrewmckenzie292
@andrewmckenzie292 4 күн бұрын
Their not a competitor as they answer to the same sovereign. Then in practise you could just combine the US military air fleet into one overall number and that is what China must aim to surpass. The US debt levels and the resulting constraints on any US defence development not deemed imperatively necessary for US homeland defence could be China's best friend. Even if most of US debt is owed to Americans themselves, this is still then not the US governments property, and if money is being wasted so some US elites can assert their personal will around the world (that is not necessary for America's own defence) unlikely regular Americans would take too kindly to this.
@Azzie420
@Azzie420 6 күн бұрын
It’s funny how in WW2 Japan was struggling to supply their boys and the only trouble the yanks had was finding out a way to ship ice cream to the boys, funniest shit you’ll ever hear.
@yarnickgoovaerts
@yarnickgoovaerts 6 күн бұрын
And yet Japan still put up such a struggle. You have to respect that
@jesseestrada8914
@jesseestrada8914 6 күн бұрын
The Americans in 1942 definately didn't feel like Ice cream was the biggest concern
@ATLBraves1992
@ATLBraves1992 6 күн бұрын
What’s even more crazy is people will say, “Germanys biggest mistake was fighting a 2 front war” while the US was fighting Japan and Germany at the same time, across the plant!
@makeachaininthecommentsect7953
@makeachaininthecommentsect7953 6 күн бұрын
​@@ATLBraves1992Because they had the luxury of being surrounded by two oceans and also Germany was fighting the brits, french and soviets and I think Japan was busy with China too.
@FhillipFry
@FhillipFry 6 күн бұрын
​@@ATLBraves1992you mean they came in after 30 million Russian and 30 million Chinese had died already?😂😂😂😂. So proud of propaganda. Seems right that Americans are the most propagandized people in the world😂😂😂😂😂
@andersonklein3587
@andersonklein3587 6 күн бұрын
And this is why I laugh when people talk of Russia as the 2nd best army in the world. China has passed them many years ago, and it's growing way faster. Other than nukes, there's no field in which China cannot overmatch Russia. The real question is, what is their power ratio compared to the American coalition. Especially in this next 6 or so years before all the new 6th gen stuff comes online. I think it will take all the might of the opposition to win a decisive victory in case of conflict, it's not going to be a trivial matter if those superpowers come to blows. On the other hand, if a war doesn't happen, the armies of China and the US will be ridiculously advanced and powerful by 2040, it will be Desert Storm all over again if either of those behemoths decide to flex on some medium sized third world country.
@jasonj3599
@jasonj3599 6 күн бұрын
I still hold the same view that military technology capabilities are proportional to economic capabilities. When a country has no money, it is difficult to research and deploy modern weapons in large quantities. It is a basic fact that China's economic growth and high-tech development are developing. Seven years ago, Binkov made a video comparing the power of China and Russia (the J20 was not yet in service at that time). At that time, Binkov said that China's conventional military power surpassed Russia, and many people were not convinced at the time. Even in this video today, many people compare Russia's predicament in Ukraine in order to belittle China. It is very likely that the people who praised Russia a few years ago were also this group of people...
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
@@jasonj3599 RF just defeated 41 nations. 1 million man modern Nato army, crushed, whipped. "predicament"
@Anonnymouse53
@Anonnymouse53 5 күн бұрын
@@TheBelrick Where?
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 5 күн бұрын
​@@jasonj3599you seem to have forgotten their national debt is larger than the US national debt now. They cannot afford to out spent the US on tech, they have a smaller economy and bigger debt. Those infrastructure projects were all funded with debt.
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
@@Anonnymouse53 The country nato+ invaded and conquered in 2014
@b21raider27
@b21raider27 5 күн бұрын
China has surpassed Russia in military power, I thought this before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. US is a global superpower, China is a regional superpower (at least currently and this decade). Manufacturing base of China is unmatched. While they don’t have the top quality military hardware like the US, quantity eventually triumphs. China’s stealth tech is second rate though. J-20 has a huge RCS compared to the F-22 and F-35. US started stealth research in the 1970s, 1981 F-117 launched.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 5 күн бұрын
然而事实是j20尾随f35
@suerin8533
@suerin8533 5 күн бұрын
Yes, even before World War II, the British Empire was the only superpower financial empire in the world, and the U.S. Navy at that time was not even as large as Japan.
@Flightman453
@Flightman453 4 күн бұрын
You have zero idea what the stealth RCS of either the J-20 or F-22/F-35 is unless the US and Chinese government showed you their classified documents in front you to see. Anything you hear about that is nothing more than speculation and more often than not, from Western sources.
@Eddie_Munster
@Eddie_Munster 6 күн бұрын
F15EX just doesn’t get enough love
@RealityCheck6969
@RealityCheck6969 6 күн бұрын
The worlds second biggest airforce is the US Navy after the US Airforce.. :)
@Maverick-ur2vp
@Maverick-ur2vp 6 күн бұрын
Can we stop this crap in 2024? It's definitely not the case if you watched the video.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
You watched this video in vain... You said before 2018 that it was okay, but it's 2024 now.😅
@georgesikimeti2184
@georgesikimeti2184 2 күн бұрын
Better view from the air than from the sea,airforce won that battle!!
@coryg1109
@coryg1109 6 күн бұрын
Just to point out something else: The Chinese aircraft engines are built with materials that just don't meet the US level of Metallurgy. What that translates into is more downtime for maintenance and engine replacement. Their engines wear out a lot faster and for every hour of flight they require about 2-3 times the maintenance time that US Aircraft require. Even if they had 2x the number of aircraft, they would have a seriously difficult time keeping them in the air to meet the US Aircraft coming.
@dominuslogik484
@dominuslogik484 6 күн бұрын
some chinese engines have improved that ratio significantly but China and Russia both struggle to provide time and money to fleets of older equipment to bring them up to standards with the newest production. so if china made 200 of something with bad engines then started making them with good engines those 200 will most often continue to have the bad engines for years or even decades.
@ferdaygaming4295
@ferdaygaming4295 6 күн бұрын
​@dominuslogik484 stealth aircraft that had "bad" Propulsion/engine (J-20)at least not that bad when they had bigger number.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
Note that China's domestically produced WS10B/C engines do not have the problems you mentioned, and the WS15 does not have them either. This problem mainly exists in the AL31F.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@ferdaygaming4295 The J20 engine problem is a thing of the past, China has now solved this problem. The WS10C can support supersonic cruise and is easier to maintain than the AL31F
@georgesikimeti2184
@georgesikimeti2184 2 күн бұрын
@@user-wr8sm6jp6jThe Chinese have been trying to get a hand on that Pratt and Whitney engine that powered the f22 for years and no success.These two engines you mentioned cannot manoeuvre without after burner,f22 can manoeuvre at ease without after burner.
@stingray427man
@stingray427man 6 күн бұрын
The US has an an entire fleet of Jets parked in the desert waiting to be reactivated or for parts. They can build very capable AI based fighters off these legacy systems.
@capitalistoppresssor2378
@capitalistoppresssor2378 6 күн бұрын
Yeah, nearly 800 modern aircraft. Almost as many as China has total. F-16A’s might be old but they can be readily updated with new engines, avionics, comms, and radar. There are structural differences compared to the C model but even there some parts can be added to beef up the structure. Not quite a C but they would be very capable replacements against an enemy with little ability to reconstitute combat losses.
@Jayfromthe202
@Jayfromthe202 5 күн бұрын
Our old planes can do even alotta damage
@Flightman453
@Flightman453 4 күн бұрын
Those planes are old and the vast majority of them are there to stay. Not all of them can simply be picked up, dusted off, and put into use again like it's washing your car.
@Flightman453
@Flightman453 4 күн бұрын
@@capitalistoppresssor2378 That not anyway near China's total for one. And this isn't a video game. Makes no sense to take those old airframes and waste time to try and refurbish them when you can build a brand new one.
@mingming9604
@mingming9604 4 күн бұрын
Amateurs talk strategy. Pros talk logistics. Hence the large tankers and transport fleet in USAF!
@missk1697
@missk1697 3 күн бұрын
Logistically China will always have an advantage as the defender.
@icecold9511
@icecold9511 3 күн бұрын
​@@missk1697 Russia's logistical issues in Ukraine suggest otherwise.
@simple17226
@simple17226 3 күн бұрын
He said defender​@@icecold9511
@noodles9345
@noodles9345 6 күн бұрын
I didn't realize we had so many F-35s in the U.S. For some reason I always had this idea that there were just a few dozen or something.
@kylehayes6432
@kylehayes6432 6 күн бұрын
The war in Ukraine has done a terrific job of showing why the US has been so heavily invested in stealth. Russia has a very difficult time utilizing their aircraft because modern aa is so advanced.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@kylehayes6432 You are wrong. If it is an air battle, the Ukrainian Air Force has almost no chance of winning. The problem with the Russian Air Force is that it cannot suppress the Ukrainian air defense system because Russia lacks electronic warfare aircraft and long-range anti-radiation weapons. The serious consequence of this is that the Russian Air Force cannot bomb deep into the rear of Ukraine.
@ohnoes3084
@ohnoes3084 6 күн бұрын
@@user-wr8sm6jp6j That’s literally what he said, Russian aircraft have a hard time operating due to Ukrainian air defense, fighters aren’t the issue, even in places where they do operate such as the recent offensives they’ve taken heavy casualties as a result of air defense
@lyft4238
@lyft4238 6 күн бұрын
Innovation > Imitation
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
Seriously does China even understand how to build aircraft? I doubt it as they didn't learn the way every other nation in the world did. We all started from nothing and worked our way up, yes with help from out friends but we actually build a foundation to understand what we were doing. China takes shortcuts skipping the hard steps, never understanding why certain design choices are made; they just know "But soviet mig, take apart, build more mig". Even today all they can do it steal Russian or American tech and slap it together in a mess. Talk about pathetic losers, China.
@GraniteStateofMind
@GraniteStateofMind 6 күн бұрын
Title brought to you by Lockheed Martin
@AlbertZiegler069
@AlbertZiegler069 6 күн бұрын
It should be noted that "mission capable rate" refers to normal operations. Planes are "non mission capable" because they have anywhere from a major to a relatively minor maintenance issue or they are overdue for an inspection. The USAF is very protective of its aircraft and will ground them over something that most likely will not cause an issue, but "most likely" is not good enough when talking about the safety of a $100m aircraft and crew during peacetime training. In large scale major combat operations, many of the maintained issues that those planes have will be waived.
@dougblack8414
@dougblack8414 6 күн бұрын
People complain about the UK's apache availability but they wont be allowed to fly with any issue even if the crew AC is not working right, when they were in afghan they were flying whenever needed
@charlesshelton7989
@charlesshelton7989 6 күн бұрын
Can confirm. Most of our fleet (F-15, f16, fa18, b52, c130, kc-135, kc10...) qualify for antique license plates
@kennethng8346
@kennethng8346 6 күн бұрын
I think one thing you should have mentioned is that the us is an expeditionary force, it has to go to the potential conflicts. Thats why the tankers and logistical capabilities. Russia, China, Iran, all have the home court advantage.
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 6 күн бұрын
But that also means if they want to pick a fight, it’s going to be in their home court, so it’s a double edged sword.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
那如果美国与现在的中国接壤会发生什么?
@matthewbarabas3052
@matthewbarabas3052 6 күн бұрын
and russia fails so badly even at that.
@callenclarke371
@callenclarke371 4 күн бұрын
I like the last line. I'm in the same boat, fascinated by military history, but with no illusions about the nature of war.
@nil981
@nil981 6 күн бұрын
The United States Air Force and the United States Navy have the first and second largest air forces in the world.
@xCeLProDucTionZz
@xCeLProDucTionZz 6 күн бұрын
Not for long china going to be the new top dog it’s industry complex is going to dwarf the United States
@tomte47
@tomte47 6 күн бұрын
China definitely have more combat planes then the U.S Navy..
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
@@tomte47 "Tom" You're lack of english is showing, that's not how people who speak english sound. Reported for trolling and impersonating. China classifies fishing boats as Naval vessels we don't care about your monopoly money numbers. Fake as hell and let's say you have 50,000 bi-planes. we're not impressed. China's "air force" is made up of cheap knock offs and reverse engineered soviet tech with a little stolen American tech sprinkled in. You can't even design your own aircraft you have to steal everything you have.
@Maverick-ur2vp
@Maverick-ur2vp 6 күн бұрын
Can we stop this crap in 2024? It's definitely not the case if you watched the video.
@tomte47
@tomte47 6 күн бұрын
@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket "You're lack of english is showing" I am Swedish but i still know the difference between You're and Your.. As for the rest of your drivel, you have not kept up with the development in China over the past 30 years. Fortunately the U.S military has and all of their focus is on countering them, China is a far more potent threat then the Soviet Union ever was and are closing the capability gap fast.
@Hangman105
@Hangman105 6 күн бұрын
Damn, so many negative comments about a speculative video.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
Because it is difficult for people to get out of the information cocoon.😅
@OverTheShenanigans
@OverTheShenanigans 6 күн бұрын
The US has the 1st and 2nd largest airforces in the world.
@luluapple1067
@luluapple1067 5 күн бұрын
Isn’t the Chinese air force 2nd?
@kutter_ttl6786
@kutter_ttl6786 5 күн бұрын
Lemme guess, you didn't watch the video before commenting?
@SCComega
@SCComega 5 күн бұрын
​@@luluapple1067US navy is #2 right now
@luluapple1067
@luluapple1067 5 күн бұрын
@@SCComegaisn’t US navy smaller than the Chinese Air Force?
@jayclean5653
@jayclean5653 5 күн бұрын
​@@luluapple1067No.
@tokyochannel2020
@tokyochannel2020 4 күн бұрын
As mentioned in previous videos, the US abililty is greatly multipied once its allies forces are taken into consideration, sOmething that sOme other 'lubtries simply dont have.
@John3.36
@John3.36 6 күн бұрын
How many conflicts or what kind of experience does the Chinese Air Force have?
@whiteshark450
@whiteshark450 5 күн бұрын
What kind of experience does the US airforce have?
@Milianaire
@Milianaire 5 күн бұрын
@@whiteshark450 What? youve ether gotta be mentally ill or just plain old dumb. Ether way I feel bad for you
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
@@Milianaire Answer his question mr fully vaccinated. What combat experience in a modern peer to peer war does the USAF have? Tell us the source of your hubris (don't bother, we know YOUR mental illness)
@shaun469
@shaun469 5 күн бұрын
The us has lots of experience against tinpot dictatorships and less then worse militarys.
@whiteshark450
@whiteshark450 5 күн бұрын
@@shaun469 🤣 Exactly, yankees think that bombing goat herders is experience... and the goat herders WON XD
@282XVL
@282XVL 4 күн бұрын
Lol remember Pooh Bear, availability always drops to 0% after your little toys off Wish encounter an F-22.
@Tanktaco
@Tanktaco 6 күн бұрын
Man the comments on Russia or China adjacent topics can be real rubbish.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
yeah
@StabbinJoeScarborough
@StabbinJoeScarborough 6 күн бұрын
Fun Fact ! China has one air refueling squadton , just one
@vasilijevukadinovic6843
@vasilijevukadinovic6843 6 күн бұрын
Where is it going to attack. They are not going around the world trying to conquer. There's are designed for national defense
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
@@vasilijevukadinovic6843 Tell that to literally every single neighbor China has, they have boarder disputes with EVERYONE. Excluding the fact they ignore UN law on the waters issue China invaded vietnam the moment we left. They stabbed their friend in the back to steal their land and what's worse; they failed miserably. Likewise China is always starting shit with India. You're a bold faced lying communist.
@bencarter7839
@bencarter7839 6 күн бұрын
Doesn't the US Navy have the 2nd largest air force in the world? 😂
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
It was true in the past, but it is no longer true now. The number of F35C deployed by the Navy is seriously insufficient, and it cannot even board the Ford-class aircraft carrier. Including the F35B of the USMC, the US Navy’s entire deployment of fifth-generation fighters is actually just not over 160. And the number of F/A18EFs does not exceed 500.
@trevor21241842
@trevor21241842 6 күн бұрын
160 f35s could take over any country 😂
@walterblack7233
@walterblack7233 6 күн бұрын
​@@trevor21241842then why they make nearly a thousand of them?Hope USAF be as confident as you against modern Chinese airforce lol😅
@jakemocci3953
@jakemocci3953 6 күн бұрын
@@trevor21241842You’re delusional. Turn off the television.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
⁠@@trevor21241842?You live in your own world, right? By the way, the F35B is completely short-legged, with a pitifully short range~ The F35C cannot be deployed on the Ford, hahahahaha😂
@_Breakdown
@_Breakdown 3 күн бұрын
4:31 - - E7 Wedgetail 9:38 - - E3G AWACS decrease in usability 12:46 - - AF satellites 🛰️ increasingly used for Opposed Force tracking 12:58 - - Constellations of 🛰️ monitoring tests w/AI 🤖 13:08 - - battle field surveillance from space 🛰️🌌 13:12 - - (Ground Moving Target Indicator from space) 🛰️🌌 13:21 - - 100 B21 stealth bombers to replace B1s + B2s 13:42 - - 6th Generation fighters + large numbers of drones 14:16 - - (2025) AF to buy = 51 F35As, 12 F15EXs // Navy = 20 F35s 14:34 - - (2025) AF to retire = 32 F22s, 91 F15s, 56 A10s, 11 F16s 14:35 - - (2026-2030) AF + Navy to buy = 780 F35s 14:59 - - AF heavily invested in new tech - in a military race w China 15:16 - - and remember - Berkov🐸 (Kermie’s cousin🐸) may talk about war - - but only real peace🕊️can bring us all together!😃🫱🏼‍🫲🏽😁🇺🇸🇨🇳🇪🇺🇷🇺🕊
@lolmao500
@lolmao500 6 күн бұрын
You know who else had a huge air force but it was garbage because it was old, not well maintained and the pilots were crap? China and Russia at some point...
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
It’s because of a simple reason: if the aircraft are too old, the fleet serviceability rate will not be very high, and the maintenance time and cost will increase exponentially.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
The Russian Air Force lacks funds, and the number of modern fighter jets purchased is very low. The Chinese Air Force is completely the opposite. The average age of its fleet aircraft is low, the sortie rate is higher, and the completion rate is higher. Moreover, the annual production capacity of the J20 has now surpassed that of the F35. The new version of the J20B equipped with the WS15 GaN radar has already started flight testing the year before last. As for the 4.5 generation aircraft, the production capacity of the J16 is much higher than that of the F15EX. The gap between the Chinese Air Force and the U.S. Air Force is that the first is the insufficient inventory, the second is that the pilots are not as experienced as the United States, and the third is the lack of strategic strike and delivery capabilities. For example, the H20 has been delayed, and the United States has the C5 transport aircraft, but China does not. However, in terms of the early warning aircraft fleet, China has surpassed the United States...
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 6 күн бұрын
@@user-wr8sm6jp6j I’m seeing less than 100 J-20 per year, whereas F-35 is at 156. Where are you seeing higher J-20 production rates?
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@deriznohappehquite Binkov released it in 2022, and also last year. The annual production capacity of 156 F35s was a thing of the past few years, and there are not so many now.
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 6 күн бұрын
@@user-wr8sm6jp6j “Lockheed executive vice president for aeronautics Greg Ulmer recently forecast that the F-35 program will have a stable production rate goal of about 156 aircraft per year for at least the next five years.”
@andreagermini8094
@andreagermini8094 6 күн бұрын
Where are the American keyboard lions here
@paleoph6168
@paleoph6168 6 күн бұрын
I thought they are bald eagles.
@abraham2172
@abraham2172 4 күн бұрын
Hypocrite
@mathiassndergard69
@mathiassndergard69 4 күн бұрын
op 10 Nations with the Most Military Aircraft (All Branches Combined) - Flight International 2022: United States 13,300 Russia 4,182 China 3,284 India 2,200 South Korea 1,608 Japan 1,451 Pakistan 1,147 Egypt 1,069 Turkey 1,065 France 1,004
@MoisesMartinez381
@MoisesMartinez381 5 күн бұрын
Let's not forget quality and experience during war
@damienruzco
@damienruzco 6 күн бұрын
Dang the USAF only has 192 helicopters does that seem weird? Does the army have lot more maybe?
@KaZokuOP
@KaZokuOP 6 күн бұрын
Yes, the Army has thousands and provides America's primary combat rotary-wing capability. Most helicopters in the USAF are assigned to support their special operations forces and do combat search and rescue.
@looinrims
@looinrims 6 күн бұрын
Army navy and marine corps have their own helicopters in organization Apache isn’t an Air Force asset
@whocares427
@whocares427 5 күн бұрын
The reason the Army went so big into helicopters is because it's the only thing they can operate themselves after the Air Force got created. Interservice rivalry stuff
@blafonovision4342
@blafonovision4342 6 күн бұрын
How well does the Chinese Air Force perform in combat?
@drksideofthewal
@drksideofthewal 6 күн бұрын
I think having more aircraft is the very last thing the US needs to worry about.
@nirvansiga5575
@nirvansiga5575 6 күн бұрын
Why did you stop making country A vs. country B videos?
@andrewhirsch6472
@andrewhirsch6472 6 күн бұрын
The real world is far more interesting, IMHO, as well as (obviously) far more important.
@caracallaavg
@caracallaavg 6 күн бұрын
Country VS country? Try the news channel bro
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
He really didnt. He politely pointed out the tip of the iceberj that is the terrible state of the USAF When USA goes hot in its war vs. BRICS. Don't you think that those 30-50 year old airframes are going to rapidly fall apart when tasked to maintain a war tempo?
@paulpowell4871
@paulpowell4871 6 күн бұрын
The great thing about Binkov is his understanding of the ancillary. Even Superman needs to sleep, get maintenance and look for Allies. Good Job my well decorated Frog, Good Job.
@peterbellini6102
@peterbellini6102 Күн бұрын
Pilots, Ground Crew, pilots, ground crew, pilots, ground crew. If Ukraine has taught us anything it's that Russia exaggerates and the PRC can't let their data out: translation? their production, training and capabilities are always "best case/best case"
@rob5944
@rob5944 6 күн бұрын
When I was in Germany with a friend I admired an example of the comparable dreadnought fleet and the Royal Navy (the preeminent force of the period). He remarked of the issues modernising it and supplying it, similar the problems the US has now.
@capitalistoppresssor2378
@capitalistoppresssor2378 6 күн бұрын
The Royal Navy won. In any case the US has a clear advantage across the board. Their engines work, their tech is better, but most important is the vast number if enablers that will give the US complete control of the battlespace while China will be 100% on the defensive, even if some of their planes might be defending themselves over Taiwan.
@rob5944
@rob5944 6 күн бұрын
@@capitalistoppresssor2378 at times like these I often remember what Patton recounted when describing the roman emperors procession.
@dominuslogik484
@dominuslogik484 6 күн бұрын
oh boy time to see the warzone that is this comment section below every Binkov Video.
@patrickcloutier6801
@patrickcloutier6801 4 күн бұрын
An advantage China may have with lower-tech aircraft is the ability to produce more of them, in shorter time. Attrition could whittle away the present US advantages in quantity and quality, if USAF airframes take significantly longer to produce.
@georgesikimeti2184
@georgesikimeti2184 2 күн бұрын
USA would have million f16 now if taken low/tech as a priority!
@SuperiorAmericanGuy
@SuperiorAmericanGuy Күн бұрын
Raptor in command and conquer generals: let’s give em an air show!
@benjaminbartholomew
@benjaminbartholomew 6 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for referring to the U-2 as Recon aircraft and not a "Spy Plane" as so many do :)
@evilfingers4302
@evilfingers4302 6 күн бұрын
Besides the number of aircraft that each country has, how about pilots themselves, how do they compare with one another?
@vasilijevukadinovic6843
@vasilijevukadinovic6843 6 күн бұрын
Considering russia are the only ones today who for 2yrs have been flying against a modern saturated Air defense. I would say them easily
@ohnoes3084
@ohnoes3084 6 күн бұрын
I feel at least with modern technology it’s less so the experience of the pilots and more the quantity, most modern nations are running low on pilots to recruit China included, this will pose a major issue for any high intensity conflict since who are you going to get to replace the guy that just died
@vasilijevukadinovic6843
@vasilijevukadinovic6843 6 күн бұрын
@ohnoes3084 problem solved already. Forgot the name but the drone planes that will be paired and controlled by 5th gen planes
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 5 күн бұрын
J-20 is NOT even as stealthy as F-35. And this can already be proven. 1ST. Their is a 3rd party radar scattering CAD simulation done on Aircraft 101. Without RAM coatings, they compared all 3 F-35, J-20, and Su-57 low observable LO characteristics through their shapes/geometry alone. In a 20x20deg frontal aspect, "J-20 RCS is higher than F-35A RCS through the frequency range (approximately 3.5 times in X-band, 1.5 times in VHF band), it still has much better RCS characteristic when compared to Su-57.” So in geometry alone without the RAM coatings, a 3.5 times difference would translate to 37% difference in detection range in the X-band which is pretty significant. Even with RAM coatings of the same level used on F-35 or F-22, J-20 is still less stealthy. But obviously their will still be a substantial difference in RAM coatings. So F-35 definitely has the “first look, first shoot, first kill” maybe even a 2nd shot in beyond visual range BVR. 2ND. Both Pacific Air Force (PACAF) head Gen. Wilsbach and US Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Brown assessment of J-20 as “It’s not anything to lose a lot of sleep over” when F-35s were able to close in on J-20s and observe them near Japan. 3RD. J-20’s canards and the whole vertical stabilizers are moving. Plus their are more than 1000+ F-35s. That is 5 times more than J-20 with more than half of that in US arsenal. So US has both quality and quantity.
@chrisdoulou8149
@chrisdoulou8149 5 күн бұрын
It was actually the other way around, the J-20’s were the ones who approached and observed the F-35’s. I’ll try to find the video when I get the chance, and this doesn’t mean the J-20 is objectively the better aircraft, but in that situation the J-20’s did gain tactical advantage.
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 5 күн бұрын
@@chrisdoulou8149 It don't change the fact that they were able to asses J-20.
@sujitbala1492
@sujitbala1492 5 күн бұрын
We literally know nothing about these highly advanced and secretive aircraft but ofc there will be keyboard warriors holding back their tears.
@chrisdoulou8149
@chrisdoulou8149 5 күн бұрын
@@johnsilver9338 and vice versa. Absolutely nobody without the kind of security clearance that doesn’t allow them to discuss the topic on the internet knows the true capabilities of either aircraft. Best to just assume that their respective airforces are happy with their performance, and they are true peers of one another. Anything else is guesswork.
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 5 күн бұрын
@@chrisdoulou8149 That's what the 3rd party radar scattering CAD simulation done on Aircraft 101 is for. It's the most accurate and comprehensive study so far.
@killxAyush
@killxAyush 6 күн бұрын
F15 EX is the best fighter which should be procured atleast 360+
@abdulazizalamri6713
@abdulazizalamri6713 5 күн бұрын
make a video about the most advanced ICBM's and which country maintain the best types today and in the near future.
@ozjohnno
@ozjohnno 18 сағат бұрын
YES the chinese is catching up in terms of numbers, but You have to remember, the stealth planes are cheap knock offs of the 'real' USA thing. Add to this the fact that Chinese material science is no where near as advanced as it is in the USA. What this means is that while the numbers may get close to the USA, the fact that their materials science is not as great will be reflacted in the No. of combat capable aircraft, and a lower life for combat aircraft. While these numbers are public knowledge in the USA, you can bet the chinese will stay stum with regards to these numbers, or outright lie as to the amount of aircraft available for combat. Should the 'fecal matter strike the rotary ventilation device', the first thing the yanks will do is Launch a concerted bombing campaign using B2 or B21 bombers, in an effort to strike airfields and any fixed anti ship missile placements. Then they would use C130's with rapid dragon missile systems to get the rest. Then the aircraft carriers will move in to clean up. With regards to the 'loyal wingman' AI drone program, the upcoming NGAD will use it, as will the F35. As for the F22, not so much. It may be the best air dominance firghter in the world, BUT it doesnt have the 'open architecture' of the F35, so I dont see it flying with loyal wingmen...... AT ALL
@kevz2474
@kevz2474 6 күн бұрын
U.S. Air Force..the largest air force in the world...the second largest air force in the world? U.S. Navy.
@thilomanten8701
@thilomanten8701 6 күн бұрын
3rd largest the winged arm of the USMC!
@willythemailboy2
@willythemailboy2 5 күн бұрын
@@thilomanten8701 If you count helicopters the Navy comes in third to the Army. The Marines air fleet is actually quite small.
@Flightman453
@Flightman453 4 күн бұрын
Actually it's the PLAAF, not the USN.
@kevz2474
@kevz2474 4 күн бұрын
@@Flightman453 nope, because the USN and the USMC are one branch.
@theheiroflotharingia8543
@theheiroflotharingia8543 6 күн бұрын
airforce not big enough you say? got it, triple the defense budget and get index on the phone!
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
Say, why is the entire USA exec branch Israelis? Hardly giving the appearance of a free and democratic nation now is it?
@Nickrioblanco1
@Nickrioblanco1 6 күн бұрын
Small unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) might make conventional airforces less relevant over the tactical battlefield.
@Tornado1861
@Tornado1861 6 күн бұрын
05:09 I see the USAF has C8 Corvettes now. They like to buy high performance chase cars for the U2. I remember them using fox body Mustangs back in the '80's.
@glowtail3744
@glowtail3744 6 күн бұрын
umm ackshully thats a mclaren 620s 🤓
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 6 күн бұрын
a lot better look than Chargers
@Tornado1861
@Tornado1861 6 күн бұрын
@@glowtail3744 Really! Now I want to ask why my tax dollars are being spent on a such an expensive car, but that is just the government being the government.
@clubprojects6923
@clubprojects6923 5 күн бұрын
Numbers are subjective. Local logistics are the linchpin.
@bigwillyj4083
@bigwillyj4083 4 күн бұрын
According to the numbers from the Indian air force and navy the Russian engines are available for 45% of the time when relatively new. As the Chinese use those engines in their aircraft or clones of them it will be close to that number.
@shanerooney7288
@shanerooney7288 3 күн бұрын
Depends. India might have to ship the engines back to Russia for some maintenance tasks. China using Chinese made engines - even if copies of Russian design - could do all the repairs in house. And thus have a better up time.
@bigwillyj4083
@bigwillyj4083 2 күн бұрын
@@shanerooney7288 the Indian armed forces have a very good maintenance record. They licence produce the engine and airframes. They had substandard engines delivered from Russia when their licence ran out for certain aircraft and sent them back after having one look at them. That shows they aren't a dumb third world country but an at least partially modern country that can do their job. So China must be having the same issues or even worse as their reverse engineering is lousy at best.
@shanerooney7288
@shanerooney7288 2 күн бұрын
@@bigwillyj4083 Did you know that, due to the Ukraine war, India is looking to diversify away from Russian spare parts and repairs. * *GASP* * But that would imply that India currently relies on Russia for spare parts and repair Hate to say that I told you so, but I told you so.
@bigwillyj4083
@bigwillyj4083 Күн бұрын
@@shanerooney7288 the Russian federation is trying to get parts and engines from India. They are moving away from the cheap to buy expensive to maintain equipment that is proven unreliable. They are now building their own buying in the west and Korea but that dates from the first moment Modi took office. You should learn how to read you might actually get a fact in your response.
@shanerooney7288
@shanerooney7288 Күн бұрын
@bigwillyj4083 Ok. Let's look at the planned upgrades for the Indian Su-30MKI fleet. Talks with Russia: since 2017 Announced: 2021. Expected Start: 2024. First Upgraded Aircraft: approx 2025. Cost: approx. $7.2 billion What is NOT part of the upgrade? The engines. With the way you're talking, you'd think the "unreliable" engines would be first on the list for replacement. But the facts say otherwise. Your turn. Any specifics for the claim Russia is buying jet engines and parts from India?
@dunnowy123
@dunnowy123 6 күн бұрын
It's kind of wild to think that one country has an air force larger, more sophisticated, and more powerful than its next two near-peer competitors COMBINED, and it's not even the totality of the air assets it has.
@maximus4765
@maximus4765 6 күн бұрын
"You can help by expanding it."
@lars1701again
@lars1701again 6 күн бұрын
You forgot the US navy
@joeclaridy
@joeclaridy 6 күн бұрын
And the US Marine Corps
@Dog.soldier1950
@Dog.soldier1950 6 күн бұрын
Ofcourse you have the #2 Air Force, USN air
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
是的,正在与胡赛进行二战以来最大的海军决战,甚至被胡赛击中航母
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
在网络上美国天下无敌
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
@@user-yw8zm9wn7l Chinese spambot troll.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
​@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket好吧,为了证明我不是机器人,我必须说实话,美国可以在一个星期内击败中国,美国是世界唯一超级大国,没有任何国家能够挑战美国,而中国即将因为人口老龄化房地产危机洪水灾害崩溃😊
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
​@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket美国正在变得越来越强大,对世界的掌控力越来越强,国内吸毒人员越来越少,美国宇宙第一
@benromign7612
@benromign7612 5 күн бұрын
Aren’t your numbers of available F35s a little short? As of May 24 there are 630 currently in the US Military
@pyeitme508
@pyeitme508 6 күн бұрын
YES
@golem5809
@golem5809 6 күн бұрын
West-Taiwan bots are not happy in the comments section xD
@AvaSimp
@AvaSimp 6 күн бұрын
xD
@jakemocci3953
@jakemocci3953 6 күн бұрын
China is going to stomp us if we test them. We can’t even cripple the Houthis, you think we’re going to win a missile duel with the most populous/industrialized country in the world? Not to mention we have too much societal strife to even raise enough men to fight, look at our military recruitment. Men aren’t going to die for rainbow flags and diversity.
@ohnoes3084
@ohnoes3084 6 күн бұрын
@@jakemocci3953 China has had its own societal strife which has gone mostly under the radar due to their mass censorship, there have been many riots in China over the past year over handling of flooding and a banking scam which involved tens of thousands of people yet most have never heard of them, China is facing recruitment issues for manpower with technical expertise, and the current Chinese military is a lower percentage of the population than that of the US. China doesn’t have the Naval capabilities as of now to invade Taiwan, their own president has acknowledged this and placed a deadline at 2027 to be ready for such operations, also when it comes to China it’s one of the few issues where most Americans are in agreement, both conservatives and progressives loathe the CCP and all it stands, you may argue that too many of them are cowards and wouldn’t act on this, but many aren’t either, and most of those fighting this war would be from Asia not the Americas anyway
@MorsanMoti
@MorsanMoti 5 күн бұрын
US needs to add more to its aircraft-carriers fleet--10 new more by 2050.
@user-tm1dk3ph1q
@user-tm1dk3ph1q 5 күн бұрын
Don't forget that the usa already has 9 smaller carriers in addition to the 11 fleet carriers. And those smaller carriers are the size of fleet carriers before the era of the nuclear powered super carrier. Also usa allies have quite a few carriers of their own.
@tommiterava5955
@tommiterava5955 5 күн бұрын
​@@user-tm1dk3ph1qThose smaller carriers are actually amphibious assault ships and are thus mostly needed in amphibious operations. USS America and USS Tripoli are two exceptions as their well decks were removed in favour of larger aviation facilities.
@MorsanMoti
@MorsanMoti 5 күн бұрын
@@user-tm1dk3ph1q Thanks. I did't know the smaller ones existed.
@user-tm1dk3ph1q
@user-tm1dk3ph1q 5 күн бұрын
​@tommiterava5955 just take a look at some pictures of them, and look at their specs to see how big they really are. They are only considered small because super carriers exist. They always carried helicopters and harriers, and now they have f-35s..the us navy has been testing them the last few years to see how many f 35s they can fit. They already normally can take 20 planes plus 2 helicopters, but I believe the wartime surge number has been 27 in recent tests. I think similar in numbers to each of the first 2 ccp carriers.
@user-tm1dk3ph1q
@user-tm1dk3ph1q 5 күн бұрын
​@@tommiterava5955the French flagship carriers has a similar number of fighters. The royal navy 2 new carriers are planned to carry something like 24 to 36 f 35s but supposedly could surge to 48. So for most countries, the 9 smaller us assault ships would be carriers.
@yosefgoldberg541
@yosefgoldberg541 6 күн бұрын
Availablity rate have nothing to do with the age of the platform, the only factors that effect availability is spare parts and manpower.
@1radar
@1radar 6 күн бұрын
If war c comes, money for maintenance and parts goes up significantly. Take a look at availability rates during desert shield / storm and other contingency operations. The other issue is experienced trained pilots flight crews. No country can come close, and those who are very good are US allies.
@Pentagram666mar
@Pentagram666mar 3 күн бұрын
I think that huge factor missed in this video is the capability to use jets in potential conflict time. Russian invasion showed how difficult it is, even if Russia poseses quite a number of jets they have issues to use them in big number, due to problem with communication, friendly fire etc. US showed it's capacity to use jets massively numerous of Times, it's hard to say something about china but my guess is they wpuld fail to coordinate such amount of planes in the air
@shanerooney7288
@shanerooney7288 3 күн бұрын
Ah, yes, assuming the country with over 1.4 Billion people has a poor concept of logistics and coordination. I'm sure this won't end badly. 😂
@peasandcarrots3169
@peasandcarrots3169 2 күн бұрын
​@@shanerooney7288A large population doesn't always equate to a competent military
@shanerooney7288
@shanerooney7288 2 күн бұрын
@peasandcarrots3169 Dare I say it... fighting COIN against goat herders with AKs and IEDs (and losing) doesn't either. When's the last time USA faught someone with an integrated air defence?
@zd1322
@zd1322 2 күн бұрын
@@shanerooney7288Really? Gulf War 1 was the last time. And when Ukraine uses the F-16s, there will probably be illicit U.S. “help.” Before GW1, it was Vietnam.
@zd1322
@zd1322 2 күн бұрын
@@shanerooney7288U.S. military didn’t lose to the goat herders, they lost to the U.S. Congress.
@estebanpacheco7102
@estebanpacheco7102 4 күн бұрын
The moment that debt payments overcome the expending on defense, its when the beginning of the end of all these magical unending without control expenditure will start. Yes, that year is 2024.
@zd1322
@zd1322 2 күн бұрын
You do realize that an interest rate cut is looming, right?
@stephend50
@stephend50 4 күн бұрын
US Coast Guard has another 200+ aircraft
@joshuaantillon1675
@joshuaantillon1675 4 күн бұрын
Can you make a video on the entire air power of the USA. you keep mentioning USN and the USMC. Include all the air supremacy vs china.
@iain-duncan
@iain-duncan 6 күн бұрын
Very disigenuous to assume China has a higher availability rate automatically despite no available information.
@archangel7052
@archangel7052 6 күн бұрын
We'll see.
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 6 күн бұрын
Did you know that there are only 290 million actual registered Chinese Communist party members? So how many will really throw their effort into some future conquest of Asia?
@akkorokamui8319
@akkorokamui8319 6 күн бұрын
It's not 'disingenuous'. He specifically said he made an educated guess based on the age of the 2 fleets, which is all he could go off of when no other data is available. I have my doubts as well but your comment is way more disingenuous then his assumption based of admittedly limited data.
@only_fair23
@only_fair23 6 күн бұрын
​@@FarmerDrewWho said anything about conquest of Asia? And why would that number make a difference?
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 6 күн бұрын
@@only_fair23 Filipino Navy vessels seized by Chicoms, that says a lot
@edwardfitzhugh4212
@edwardfitzhugh4212 6 күн бұрын
The great thing everyone forgets is that if you pick a fight with the US you pick a fight with NATO Japan Australia South Korea etc etc etc..
@cameronbuckley3356
@cameronbuckley3356 5 күн бұрын
North Korea has a stronger military then both of them combined ..
@TheBelrick
@TheBelrick 5 күн бұрын
I think you will see, if you look, that its usa doing the fight picking. Including vs. Russia and China.
@jayclean5653
@jayclean5653 5 күн бұрын
​@@cameronbuckley3356Right...
@SelfProclaimedEmperor
@SelfProclaimedEmperor 5 күн бұрын
​@@cameronbuckley3356north Korea has a smaller economy than south Koreas military budget
@domokun845
@domokun845 5 күн бұрын
NATO...army....riiiight
@donm5354
@donm5354 6 күн бұрын
US SPACE FORCE needs to start building Space Battlecruisers disguised as unarmed cargo/mining vessels on the way to developing OMEGA CLASS Destroyers armed with Mass Drivers to hurl asteroids at Earth based targets (but they the just Mining Ships send cargo back to Earth 😉)
@oneshotme
@oneshotme 4 күн бұрын
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 6 күн бұрын
We have over 600 tanker aircraft Just sayin 🤓
@BorisEysbroek
@BorisEysbroek 6 күн бұрын
HECK YEAH!!! I want to be an American so badly. I want to know what it's like to live in a country that has the biggest stick.
@The_FatGeneral
@The_FatGeneral 6 күн бұрын
@@BorisEysbroek I hope you're joking
@BorisEysbroek
@BorisEysbroek 6 күн бұрын
​@@The_FatGeneral No, I want a bald eagle as a pet, go shopping with a mobility scooter and send my kids with bulletproof backpacks to school. And above all, I want to be able to turn on the tv and hear my tax money being used to invade countries whose military spending is less than our military's spending on coffee cups. I'm tired of being a punny skinny european. I want to be a big bad fat american that doesn't take shit from anyone!
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 6 күн бұрын
@@BorisEysbroek it is complex, cognitive dissonance inducing, intoxicating, and edifying. I have never felt more proud or more anxious to be an American.
@BorisEysbroek
@BorisEysbroek 6 күн бұрын
@@FarmerDrew Now I have to emigrate. I want to experience this first hand. It sounds like one hell of a trip.
@capitalistoppresssor2378
@capitalistoppresssor2378 6 күн бұрын
Good video, but I would like to push back a bit. I’m pretty sure you are missing a fairly large number of aircraft, both fighters and other platforms. I think perhaps 400 fighters from the US total, ~178 tankers, 38 AWACS, etc. Many are in the war reserve (storage) and others are scattered in places you wouldn’t expect (like the US navy operating a couple of squadrons of F-16’s in aggressor squadrons, air show teams or just sitting in the desert somewhere. Those fighters in storage all have hot production lines and could readily be modernized and brought into service in a long war to replace losses. Current production lines in the US can build upwards of 274 modern aircraft per year, most of which is sold internationally, and there are large numbers of parts in storage to bring back planes from the boneyard and the military practices doing it regularly. As to readiness, I think it is not the issue you think it is in a wartime scenario. Certifying aircraft as ready is an involved process that can include engine runs or even test flights along with a bunch of other tests and checks to achieve certification. It is actually detrimental to aircraft fleet management to maintain excessively high readiness because it might literally involve putting extra hours on aging airframes or engines, etc. Besides, much of the mtx is deferrable and is fact deferred without really impacting the ability of the aircraft to perform most missions, so I think it is completely unrealistic to think either side would not do missions unless there was some safety critical item preventing it. As to the Chinese though, new airplanes or not, they have crap engines that need to go through major overhauls far, far more often than US engines. That implies much more lower level maintenance also. There is no reason to think other Chinese components do not suffer similar problems. That said I’m sure they would also maintain high levels of availability in wartime conditions as well. The U.S. has numbers, the tech advantage and a vastly larger aerospace industry to draw on. China doesn’t have tankers because they are barely able to build them. Most of the world’s aerospace capacity is either in the US (over 50% of the total) or its partners (most of the rest). There are basing issues in the western pacific that along with distance will slow down sortie generation and could cause problems if Taiwan were to quickly collapse, but the reality is that China just isn’t in the same league when it comes to air power. Not this decade anyways.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
It's good to live in your own information cocoon. Let me say a few things. ① The problem of Chinese engines has been solved. What do you mean by "American engines are stronger"? At most, it's about service life, not thrust. The thrust of WS10BE that China exports to Pakistan has reached 14.5KN, and WS10C has reached 15K N. Is it a reasonable guess? The early version of F119 was also at this level, not to mention that China also has WS15. The high thrust of the US F135 is based on a large bypass ratio, which results in the extremely poor supersonic cruise capability of the F35. ② China has a new type of tanker YY20, and the number is being rolled out at a relatively fast speed. As for why it is not as many as the United States, it is because there is no global deployment mission. It only needs to deal with the South China Sea and Taiwan, and at most to the second island chain. ③ The large-scale grounding of aircraft is the United States' own situation. You think that the Chinese Air Force also has this situation, but you are judging others by yourself. It is a kind of conclusion first, and then look for "evidence"😅😅
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
Let's discuss [technical advantage] again. The F16CDblock52, which is widely equipped by the US Air Force, is compared with the JF17 block3. China's evaluation of the Jf17 block3 is far inferior to the J10C. You can look at Pakistan's evaluation, 【PAF pilot: "The F-16 block 52 is ancient compared to the avionics on the JF-17 now. We know because we fly them both" Source: Airforce Monthly, 01-2024 "JF-17C makes public debut". 】It can be seen that the avionics of block52 are far behind those of JF17C, let alone J10C? Even if it is upgraded to F16V, it is difficult to discuss which one is stronger, rather than the so-called huge technical advantage.
@capitalistoppresssor2378
@capitalistoppresssor2378 6 күн бұрын
Actually, I suspect you are counting the Harriers and I am not (I don’t really consider them a 4th gen aircraft). So most probably you are not including the nearly 800 4th gen fighters that the US maintains in storage as a war reserve. All of those can be brought back into service at rates which would be useful for replacing losses.
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
@@capitalistoppresssor2378 Hahahaha, you are wrong again. 1. How many J10/J15/J11/J16/Su30/Su35 are there in China? You can search on Wikipedia. The J10 series alone is almost 800. Not counting the fifth-generation aircraft. Let me tell you, the aircraft in the aircraft graveyard have little practical significance. They are just used as spare parts. The United States has already conducted many investigation reports on this point. It is more troublesome to refurbish an old aircraft than to build a new one.
@Jerry-JX2906
@Jerry-JX2906 6 күн бұрын
It’s nice to see your insight being a couple decades old. Gives me confidence.😂
@elmogaming28
@elmogaming28 Күн бұрын
can you do Spain vs Andorra war please
@Nutty151
@Nutty151 20 сағат бұрын
Spain's military is so shit that they can only take over tiny countries like Andorra. Spain not dare invade Gibraltar because they know they will get their ass whooped by the U.K.
@pahtar7189
@pahtar7189 6 күн бұрын
One factor to consider in a US vs China future conflict is that the US is a global power. As such, China would never face more than 2/3 of US naval or air forces. The rest will be deployed in the Middle East, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, etc. Given that, US forces need to be 50% more numerous just to cover the gap.
@only_fair23
@only_fair23 6 күн бұрын
Realistically, if China invaders Taiwan, other actors will be getting involved in their own problems as well
@matthewbarabas3052
@matthewbarabas3052 6 күн бұрын
do they need to be...?
@kylehayes6432
@kylehayes6432 6 күн бұрын
Yes, but this ignores the fact that odds are, we won't be by ourselves.
@rossNessmith-gr1z
@rossNessmith-gr1z 6 күн бұрын
不要表现的好像美国很强大一样,实际上中国才是隐形的全球超级大国,全球有一半以上的工业实物由中国生产,还有即便美国将所有军事力量调动到西太平洋那也只是让美国海空军全军覆没而已
@rossNessmith-gr1z
@rossNessmith-gr1z 6 күн бұрын
​@@kylehayes6432哦,我想你说的是日本韩国,好吧,提醒你,朝鲜这个拥有核弹的家伙是与中国唯一签订军事条约的盟友,另外美国在欧洲盟友绝大部分的军队规模甚至无法填满一个足球场
@robertalaverdov8147
@robertalaverdov8147 2 күн бұрын
The US is now paying more on the interest for its debt than its entire military budget. Over $1 trillion a year on just the interest and it's getting worse. This happened 6 years sooner than expected. Every 3 months the US adds $1 trillion in debt and that number is also growing. Meanwhile US GDP growth is at a meager 1-2%. Trade deficits are also getting worse. And with so many countries moving away from dollar denominated trade. Inflation is going to become an endemic drag on the US economy. How long can the US maintain such reckless spending?
@zd1322
@zd1322 2 күн бұрын
How are interest rates set?
@robertalaverdov8147
@robertalaverdov8147 2 күн бұрын
@@zd1322 The federal reserve sets them. Though they have to answer to market conditions. If the rate is too low then it causes inflation along with lack of interest in purchasing bonds then it won't work. Set them too high in order to attract bondholders the economy might crash.
@98Enzio
@98Enzio 2 күн бұрын
Ask the Japanese
@robertalaverdov8147
@robertalaverdov8147 2 күн бұрын
@@98Enzio In 2023 Japan spent 22% of its federal budget on servicing its debt. There are some unique ways that Japan has kept their house of cards going but it is starting to catch up with them. In fact by 2034 Japan will be spending almost half their budget on their debt interest. There is no such thing as free money. It all has to come from somewhere.
@ihl0700677525
@ihl0700677525 Күн бұрын
Military and law enforcement are the raisons d'etre for a state/govt. For America, which current economy and prosperity dependent upon global security (or at least global stability), having powerful military is a must. IMO it's better to cut some useless social programs (which btw, is like ~35% of federal budget), than reducing military expenditures and risk losing US military supremacy, especially when US allies in both Europe and Asia are threatened by the resurgence Russia and China.
@user-ym8py3qi1v
@user-ym8py3qi1v 5 күн бұрын
thank you for the 15 minutes video, this is the optimal length for many topics.
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
The US Navy is the second largest air force in the world as well. Quantity is not a quality all it's own when we're talking about cheap knockoffs.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 6 күн бұрын
😂是的,数量不代表质量,你怎么能让一堆无法超高音速飞行航程距离相当短,经常故障坠毁的f35与中国这个拥有最多第四代第五代重型战斗机的国家相比呢?😂
@Maverick-ur2vp
@Maverick-ur2vp 6 күн бұрын
not true as of 2024
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
You said quality? Come on, let's see what Pakistan thinks? I don't want to compare J20 and F22, J35 and F35, J16 and F15EX, but you can take a look at the evaluation of third parties. Is this more reasonable? The so-called better quality? Let me tell you, Pakistan evaluates F16C/D block52 (the US Air Force is now equipped with block 52) and JF17 block3. [PAF pilot: "The F-16 block 52 is ancient compared to the avionics on the JF-17 now. We know because we fly them both" Source: Airforce Monthly, 01-2024 "JF-17C makes public debut" 】JF17 block3, the Chinese Air Force does not want to equip, its avionics equipment and radar are far inferior to J10C, not to mention that China also has PL15 with a range stronger than AIM120D. The so-called American fighter jets are far better than Chinese fighter jets, which is just wishful thinking of some people. As for maintenance, didn't these people watch the video? The US Air Force's F35 grounding rate is as high as 49%. What is the so-called capability and maintenance? What world do people who say this live in? If this is the case with new aircraft, what is the deployment rate of F15F16 F22? You can imagine. The people in the comment area are even more optimistic than the Pentagon itself~😅😅😅
@user-wr8sm6jp6j
@user-wr8sm6jp6j 6 күн бұрын
Another point, quality? F35 crashed more than 10 times, grounding rate more than 49%, better quality? Don't be funny😅
@iamscoutstfu
@iamscoutstfu 6 күн бұрын
Btw, 10 crashes is less than a 1% crash rate. Its better than any other fighter jet out there.
@aaahus4836
@aaahus4836 6 күн бұрын
F16 from us to Ukraine in 2025?
@lmao.3661
@lmao.3661 6 күн бұрын
china has already peaked
@AvaSimp
@AvaSimp 6 күн бұрын
so has USA, 24 years ago
@Maverick-ur2vp
@Maverick-ur2vp 6 күн бұрын
Say that when Chinese airforce, navy building becomes slower than that of the US again, I doubt you will see it in next 30 years.
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
@@Maverick-ur2vp China counts fishing boats in it's navy... who are you trying to fool?
@jasonj3599
@jasonj3599 6 күн бұрын
@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket😅 What world are you living in? What does the Chinese Navy count as a fishing boat? Can't you check Wikipedia? China has a lot of corvettes, but this is a fishing boat?
@abraham2172
@abraham2172 4 күн бұрын
Well, what did they expect? Their success rested on stealing western technologies, drawing in western investments and modernizing/liberalizing their economy. Now, thanks to Xi Jinpings highly aggressive behavior and new politics, both factors wither away like ice in the sun.
@luddite31
@luddite31 5 күн бұрын
Everyone loves to compare fighter numbers, but they forget about the most critical factor: RANGE. None of the USAF planes as the range to operate over Taiwan without being based there. That means they'd based on runways getting bombed by Chinese missiles. They could maybe fly in from Okinawa or the philippines, but that's hardly safe either and would give them just a few minutes of loiter time. That's why the air force is pushing the B21 and NGAD so hard, both with an emphasis on range: most of its existing planes are useless for a serious fight over Taiwan.
@Flightman453
@Flightman453 4 күн бұрын
Someone that knows what they're talking about!
@missk1697
@missk1697 3 күн бұрын
@@Flightman453 Exactly. People forget reality isn't a video game where you can just throw everything you have at the enemy and distance is just a number.
@erasmus_locke
@erasmus_locke 6 күн бұрын
Why we aren't replacing old F-15 with the new EX makes no sense to me. Same with the F-16 and 35
@iumbo1234
@iumbo1234 6 күн бұрын
Very simple: the American industry is no longer as strong as it used to be.
@mishkalewis8409
@mishkalewis8409 6 күн бұрын
time and money, also mission profiling, the F16 is a good multirole jet for high intensity air campaigns the f15 is mainly an air superiority fighter. sure it has some multirole packages but not on the same level and the f16 and new f35. also why replace the 35 now, its very new compared to literally everything else. The F15EX is a extremely expensive package deal. its not something you just sign off on out of nowhere, bidget constraits and beurocrats need to look over the proper documentation before a buy can be made. im sure if the US air force got all the money in the world they'd make lockheed build thousands of factories and just chug out plane after plane after plane of f35's f22's f15Ex's etc etc. but they dont, sure the US budget is milehigh, but most of that goes to maintenance of already existing platforms. huge production contracts take years to make and plan out, the f35 has been on the books for decades now. but now that development is truly reached a safe point lockheed had really put the pedal to the metal and churned out a boatload of jets for not just the US but its close allies. But anyhow the F15EX is a very good plane, but it lacks certain technologies the f35 has and parts commonality. the more standardised the NATO and close-Nato allies are the easier it is to work together during a conflict, logistics become more or less the same, thats why ammotypes in most of the west has been 5.56 NATO and most tank cannons were the german L/44 and L/55's and its licenced copies. thats why most nato countries bought the starfighters, the phantoms, the sabre's, the falcons and now the lightning 2.
@mishkalewis8409
@mishkalewis8409 6 күн бұрын
it all about interoperability, and shaping defence strategies. NATO splits up its countries in weird ways on purpose, like f.ex. The US is the defacto military leader of NATO and aircraft provider. the germans usually stood for most NATO countries tank selections. albeit in the cold war it was also huge in the battle rifle space and still is with new carbines and rifles. The british are focused more on special missions and QRF. the French is a different breed of weird so i wont even go into that. The Germans alone have several deals for half/half divisions like: 130th German/British Bridging Engineer Battalion Franco-German Brigade Multinational Corps Northeast 43rd Mechanized Brigade (dutch/german brigade) but without striving to far, its mostly either budget constraits or the need for parts commonality in nato for easier cooperation. and sometimes its arguably just dumb politics. but its not as easy as just saying why not just take that thing because its better. a good example for that would be the Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 A Much better plane, but more expensive, thus they went with Lockheed instead, albeit both jets are fucking insane and stupid good for their time. but the better plane ultimately lost because money wasnt around for it.
@iivin4233
@iivin4233 6 күн бұрын
Money can be exchanged for goods and services, but sometimes the good and/or service you want costs more money than you have. This may go some way towards explaining why the EX isn't being purchased and why American school busses don't have golden seat belt buckles. Or seat belts at all.
@capitalistoppresssor2378
@capitalistoppresssor2378 6 күн бұрын
simply not true. The U.S. produces nearly 300 modern fighters per year, far more than Russia and China combined. Most are sold internationally because the U.S. is ridiculously dominant and only is replacing air frames as they age out.
@MrGriff305
@MrGriff305 6 күн бұрын
Not big enough for what? Also, the Navy has a few planes too.
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket
@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket 6 күн бұрын
USAF largest air force in the world. So who's number 2? The US Navy.. Lol.
@voidtempering8700
@voidtempering8700 4 күн бұрын
​@@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusketThat haan't been true for a few years now. The PLAAF is 2nd, and has been since 2018.
@williamkleeberg751
@williamkleeberg751 6 күн бұрын
These are the same people that thought one child policy for 40 years was a good idea at the same time everyone stated living in condos. Nobody checked the demographics
@alanfriesen9837
@alanfriesen9837 5 күн бұрын
It was an excellent idea for a country with a runaway population. That policy has a lot to do with China's current success.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 5 күн бұрын
然而中国只有北方地区一部分省份执行一胎政策,另外实际上即便在过去40年一胎政策下大部分中国家庭都有几个孩子,还有由于中国独特的体制问题在中国即便是60岁的老人也比美国大量吸毒人员流浪汉更有价值
@andrewmckenzie292
@andrewmckenzie292 5 күн бұрын
China would likely be in the realm of 1.6-1.7 billion today without it. Its the inevitable crisis that had to happen basically. Likely Chinese society will need a massive reorganization so that older people's skills in non-manual labour job are utilized much better (such as in leadership/mentor roles) so that the limited pool of younger people can be focused solely on manual labour. Most likely the aging population dilemma that is being faced by most developed nations also will be temporary until the generation when the birth rate was higher dies out, then the age pyramid will even out again. China likely needs to half its population if it wants it to be sustainable.
@vovab4922
@vovab4922 3 күн бұрын
World: USA, how many aircrafts do you need? USA: Yes
@nekomakhea9440
@nekomakhea9440 6 күн бұрын
>The US Air Force is the biggest in the world. But still not big enough. Maybe it's not the size of the USAF that's the problem, but the size and scope creep of the mission?
@dominuslogik484
@dominuslogik484 6 күн бұрын
its the lack of ability to rely on regional allies to carry the fight on their own, thankfully with Japan and South Korea China and North Korea can be kept in check but if it weren't for the US those two wouldn't be enough so the majority of the air power would have to come from the U.S. in the case of Russia in Europe I think the EU and NATO (especially with the new addition of Sweden and Finland) has started to wake up and the US might be able to shift away some of its focus in that region for air power. in fact just between Sweden and Finland that added another 125 combat jets into the NATO airpower count, that brings the total somewhere over 800 combat air frames which is sadly a bit low when you consider how many nations are required to get to that number but at the very least it means with the US putting down around 200 fighters in the region air superiority should be easily achieved.
@ferdaygaming4295
@ferdaygaming4295 6 күн бұрын
​@@dominuslogik484US just need European Nation (EU) to have more fighter, they can spread the cost to field those jet.
@AncientRylanor69
@AncientRylanor69 6 күн бұрын
2
@ItsShane79
@ItsShane79 6 күн бұрын
@Binkov, please make a video about the Russia ~ North Korea militairy pact and the implications it will have for NATO and the US. Tell your fans what master move Putin has done now. :D
@Youraveragenpc11
@Youraveragenpc11 6 күн бұрын
TRIPLE THE DEFENSE BUDGET 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@hyznx9871
@hyznx9871 5 күн бұрын
Is china can attack Philippines first ignoring taiwan and japan?
@raimsdayer4488
@raimsdayer4488 5 күн бұрын
Nope
@zhongxina9420
@zhongxina9420 5 күн бұрын
nah, taiwan is more likely
@hyznx9871
@hyznx9871 5 күн бұрын
@@zhongxina9420 don't know man the damn Chinese forcing the Philippines to start the fight so the defense treaty wont work
@billshun3963
@billshun3963 5 күн бұрын
China is not going to initiate a war with its neighbors, even though that’s what the big ( kahuna ) in the other side of the ocean wants.
@thekittenofwar4421
@thekittenofwar4421 5 күн бұрын
@@billshun3963 China should probably stop initiating war with its neighbors to undermine the US propaganda then. Otherwise Vietnam, South Korea, Nepal, India, Russia, Tibet, etc, would like a word with you.
@watcher5729
@watcher5729 6 күн бұрын
Well it deoends on strategie.chinese is defense or deceat neighbours should there be.the hardeer is crossing oceans to attack
@jackwardley3626
@jackwardley3626 5 күн бұрын
I think the U.S. military needs to be at least twice the size it is
@gladlawson61
@gladlawson61 5 күн бұрын
Lol.
@user-yw8zm9wn7l
@user-yw8zm9wn7l 5 күн бұрын
我强烈支持美国学习苏联将军费支出提高到gdp的百分之10以上,因为不管美国如何增加军费开支也无法在西太平洋战胜中国,那只是加速帝国的灭亡而已
@user-md8ub8vy6b
@user-md8ub8vy6b 5 күн бұрын
​@@user-yw8zm9wn7l动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
@IHATEGOOGLESOMUCHFUCK
@IHATEGOOGLESOMUCHFUCK 5 күн бұрын
​@@user-yw8zm9wn7l smartest chinese ultranationalist
@jackwardley3626
@jackwardley3626 5 күн бұрын
@@user-yw8zm9wn7l I don't think the Chinese navy and Air force would last but your right in that the U.S. wouldn't be able completely beat China also the U.S. military at its current size would need to concentrate nearly all of its forces in achieving a conventional victory against them leaving the U.S. exposed in other areas of the world which is why U.S. military needs to be 2-3 times its currents size needs to be big enough to fight and deter China and Russia at the same time while more than what they need in reserve mean I know that would probably mean 10% plus of their GDP but its what they need on paper but maybe the U.S. command doesn't think its worth it due to nuclear weapons
@bb-6359
@bb-6359 5 күн бұрын
Double the defense budget boys
@larrystrambi8281
@larrystrambi8281 4 күн бұрын
US Air Force may not be funding NGAD anymore not certain but that apparently is recent buzz.
@nobodyherepal3292
@nobodyherepal3292 4 күн бұрын
Doubtful.
@stevenjohnston7809
@stevenjohnston7809 6 күн бұрын
USAF might be the biggest in the world, but the second biggest is the USA Navy.
USAF is rushing NGAD's drone fighter jets into service
22:45
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 141 М.
China lacks assault ships for Taiwan invasion. But it has other solutions.
18:20
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 168 М.
Sprinting with More and More Money
00:29
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 192 МЛН
PINK STEERING STEERING CAR
00:31
Levsob
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
Haha😂 Power💪 #trending #funny #viral #shorts
00:18
Reaction Station TV
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
How Big Tech Ruined Farming
25:01
Wendover Productions
Рет қаралды 208 М.
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Joe Scott
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Fall of Gaddafi: The 2011 Libyan Revolution | Animated History
18:46
The Armchair Historian
Рет қаралды 203 М.
Can industrial output decide US v China war?
23:50
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 149 М.
Does the F-15EX compare to the Chinese J-16 Flanker?
24:55
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 135 М.
Why Flying Wings Are Terrible For Commercial Use
17:36
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 227 М.
South Korea is dying (but it has a plan)
18:56
CaspianReport
Рет қаралды 302 М.
New US anti-ship ballistic missile tailored against China
18:28
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 177 М.
Why is no one buying Russian fighter jets anymore?
16:07
Binkov's Battlegrounds
Рет қаралды 234 М.
ҚАЙНОНАСИГА ПРАНК 😨
0:15
BOBUR ALI
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
🤷🏻‍♂️She Took His Skittles And Discolored Him😲🥴
0:33
BorisKateFamily
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
ҚАЙНОНАСИГА ПРАНК 😨
0:15
BOBUR ALI
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
ҚАЙНОНАСИГА ПРАНК 😨
0:15
BOBUR ALI
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН