Sadly, some of the "new" atheist websites target a video of mine, urging their followers to flood the video with negative comments and "dislikes." Childish, but so it goes.
@Joyfulminimalist6 жыл бұрын
I'd say they were pretty unsuccessful, gives that I see way more likes. :)
@phaturtha2166 жыл бұрын
Good to know the Catholic church never (fully) capitulated to heliocentrism and darwinism, because as it turns out the bulwarks of modernity are foundations of sand, science falsely so-called.
@vinny24594 жыл бұрын
Have you ever listened to chuck missler father barron he has some interesting views as a theologian and a scientist
@vinny24594 жыл бұрын
@Meso Phyl what are you even talking about
@playasurf10004 жыл бұрын
why am i not surprised
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
Some forms of Christianity encourage anti-intellectualism. My own form, Roman Catholicism, decidedly does not.
@learnbibleversethroughpict60272 жыл бұрын
Yes 🤗💕
@jepkemei2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Bishop Barron. I am not catholic but i completely agree with you on not dumbing down the faith. I love your exposition of philosophy and scripture. Greetings from Kenya !
@Gothlore2 ай бұрын
I think you're confusing intellectualism with obvious reality. Many forms of Christianity deny obvious reality, all forms are anti-intellectual in that the same logic can't be used broadly and special pleading always appears to justify one religion over another or over no religion.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
I'm stating that the book of Genesis's account of creation isn't false, though it is, from a strict scientific standpoint, inaccurate. It conveys profound theological and spiritual truth.
@bishopsheen198511 жыл бұрын
May God bless Father Barron for fighting so much stupidity and indifference day after day with so much truth, eloquence, and compassion!
@GutPyle12 жыл бұрын
I'm 55 years old. I converted to Catholicism this year after a life of listening to my protestant brethren perpetuate the myths and misunderstandings of the faith I once categorized as "silly" and burdened with "ritual". I opened my eyes, shut my mouth, and tried an objective approach to understanding it. Once I did, I embraced the truth, and I am now connected to Christ more deeply, personally and spiritually than I could have ever imagined.
@MiracleTemplePenticostal Жыл бұрын
Amen, thanks for sharing, may the Lord be with you 🙏
@jonathanappleby95937 ай бұрын
Now 66, how is it going?
@Daewonnni7 жыл бұрын
You are one of the best Christian apologetics in our generation. I got to a Pentecostal church, but I can appreciate what you are doing Bishop Barron. I listen and I pray for you sir! Thank you.
@BishopBarron7 жыл бұрын
God bless you!
@scoremxcom Жыл бұрын
Pray in one hand and shit in the other, see which hand fills up the fastest.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Well, I agree with you about Maher's intellectual ability, but if he comes forward publicly with a stupid point of view, it seems that I have the right to oppose him, don't I?
@StJoseph7776 жыл бұрын
This movie turns out to have been part of a planned anti-Christian hate propaganda campaign to convince young Millenials to hate us. It worked, on its intended audience. It was crafted for impressionable young people, and made using the exact propaganda techniques as used by Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia and Maoist China. Right down the line, same out of date and ridiculous talking points, same recruitment methods. Those kids are the ones now attacking us, or leaving the Church. We didn't recognize what it was. This was true of the Four Horsemen media campaign too. We have lots of support for this contention, now.
@dar32756 жыл бұрын
and the sexual abuse
@alexisarrizon60836 жыл бұрын
Bishop Robert Barron you are amazing and super intelligent and so aware of the Lord, people like Maher are inferior and need prayer.
@qlddave6 жыл бұрын
WOW You really hate Christians don't you. Unless someone has a degree in theology you just call them stupid.
@rons8786 жыл бұрын
Inferior?, your a grownup that believes all humanity cam3 from one man and one woman, maybe your family comes from a long line of incest, but I'll take evolution. And I love that Bishop Barron makes the same old cliché statement, "The bible is up to interpretation", man god is so smart, that he inspired a book that can be anything to anyone, a clearer message would have probably been a better play here, oh great imaginary friend in the sky, grow up. Logic and Reason beats faith all day, every day, and twice on Sunday, it being the Sabbath and everything.
@garygrant69878 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Bishop Barron. Your words, dignity and kind demeanor are inspiring.
@garygrant69877 жыл бұрын
Anti Hoax Machine, brother, your conduct, the very unsettled and combative nature of it, is a testament against atheism. God bless you, sir. If you find no faith, may you come to love something the way that God loves you.
@garygrant69877 жыл бұрын
Brother, if you are willing to have a respectful conversation about that point, 'suffering', I'd be willing to do that.
@garygrant69877 жыл бұрын
A 'loving God' cannot exist without that God providing freewill- which unfortunately allows some folks to choose evil. Love is also freedom. Freedom with a calling toward goodness. Brother, I don't mind debating with you. May I request we keep the tone of our conversation respectful, as opposed to all the 'you' 'you' 'you' provocation?
@garygrant69877 жыл бұрын
Depends. There are many opinions on the matters of Sociopaths and Mental Deficiencies. I can say this, Sociopaths typically have a few things in common- some of the things they share is a reverence (worship) for both power and a gravity toward nihilistic paradigms. While, in most cases, its difficult to discern where this begins, the sociopath is basically a snowball- out to prove 'nothing matters' and that they can use that 'elevated' posture to accumulate personal power.
@garygrant69877 жыл бұрын
I did not say nihilism has life or purpose nurturing value. I only gave the term meaning, in as so, as it has a great sway on the hearts of men. Nihilism is a false God, and yet it's worship is deeply dis-organizing. Imho, I don't think I'm making any assumption. I have seen where men veer off to when they worship nihilism and the emptiness it welcomes inside. I'm watch years and years of psychologists attempting to cure this emptiness by 'boosting the self-esteem' ... but if fatalism or nihilism has become the 'God' of someone's heart, it always turns up more empty.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
And I suppose the "molestation" never works in the other direction! Both sides get into trouble when they move outside of the legitimate bounds of their respective methods. Creationism is a sort of invasion of science by a poorly-understood religiosity, just as scientism is an invasion of religion by a poorly-understood science.
@ajh46632 жыл бұрын
STICK TO TALKING ABOUT FAITH, DONT START WITH SCIENCE. POORLY UNDERSTOOD SCIENCE IS THE REASON WE STILL RE3SEARCH! YOU HAVE YOUR ANSWERS IN A BOOK! WRITTEN BY NUMEROUS AUTHORS AFTER THE FACT! THERES A DIFFERENCE. SCIENCE WANTS TO BE PROVEN WRONG - RELIGION HAS ALL THE ANSWERS! THIS IS VERY PROBLEMATIC FOR THE PROGRESSION OF ALL HUMANITY!
@mmmail19692 жыл бұрын
@@ajh4663 Are we talking the "SCIENCE" of perhaps a better medicine to treat a disease or, the science of a more advanced weapon system, for waging war? Do YOU have a view on the subject?
@TrishRyan-ey8goАй бұрын
Not always the case! That statement is a gross overstatement! There are many many scientists/atheists who are ex religious or even current religious! Like me a nurse who went to 16 years of Catholic School! I graduated from Catholic University! Also, ever talk to a Baptist about science?? 🧬 oh voy!
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that. Keep your heart open. Who knows what the Spirit might do.
@ajh46632 жыл бұрын
the spirit will do the same as always in the history of the world!! NOTHING!
@afrojojo9475 Жыл бұрын
@@ajh4663 Amen
@ajh4663 Жыл бұрын
@@afrojojo9475 to who? Me or your imaginary sky daddy? Same results for either, respectively … NOTHING!!!!
@afrojojo9475 Жыл бұрын
@@ajh4663 My imaginary sky daddy? I don't have one of those. But I agree with your answer. AMEN!
@ajh4663 Жыл бұрын
@@afrojojo9475 AMEN? Now that’s special. That’s like me saying ALIEN… or FAIRY…
@adamdanuarte10 жыл бұрын
Thank father, I'm catholic from indonesia
@Adroyo5 жыл бұрын
Selamat Siang Dari Australia!
@brianw.52307 жыл бұрын
Bishop Barron is a genius.
@UncleZInactive10 жыл бұрын
This guy makes good points.
@NaYawkr10 жыл бұрын
Truth is always that way.
@potdragon80916 жыл бұрын
UncleZInactive - As long as you believe a single book is a "library".🙄 SINGLE. BOOK.
@drfraudulence9096 жыл бұрын
Pot Dragon Actually, there are 73 books in the Bible. The more you know.
@JurkusMartynas6 жыл бұрын
Bible is not a book. Bible is a collection of many ancient scripts.
@Tom-cn4cm3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately it's all rather mute due to the fact that the Catholic Church prefers to sweep under the rug the issue of child abuse.
@gothschaefer66319 жыл бұрын
Fr. Robert Barron is amazing!
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
What I find absolutely hilarious is that a fair chunk of atheists take the bible as literally as the fundamentalists they proclaim to hate. The second you inform them that, actually, the majority of the Christian world doesn't take the whole book at literal value, they are at a loss. The wise athiest comes up with more compelling argument for their perspective, while the foolish one stumbles, flounders and resorts to insults.
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
***** So, they use the same single-minded thinking? That's not encouraging at all.
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
***** What the hell are you talking about?
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
***** Ooooh, yeah. I agree. I love how atheists dismiss God as an "imaginary friend" or a "sky fairy", or alike. It shows they don't even bother to look up the most basic thing, which is: How does Christianity, theologically, define God?
@alex_roivas3338 жыл бұрын
I don't mean to pick on other kinds of christianiy, but the reason these former fundamentalist and current atheists didn't even learn a proper or more in depth theology is other childish denominations. In Catholicism if you don't "feel" that God exists, okay, fine, you're allowed to doubt and still be a catholic. But some of these evangelicals and fundamentalists require that you be "born again" and actually literally "feel" that God exists, not just know or believe it as an intellectual belief
@fernandojimenez44147 жыл бұрын
Yhea but I mean we all know its on obvious old scam
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
That you can make that observation in the wake of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and the nearly 100,000,000 corpses that secularist ideologies produced in the 20th century is simply staggering to me.
@JDKVJ12 жыл бұрын
I watched Religulous a few days ago. Bill Maher also got me, a Student in Theology, asking a few questions and doubting things in our faith. I got the idea that is exactly what he wanted. He edited the film and chose the interviews very carefully to make religion, especially Christianity, look like a joke. Thank you for this video. It helped me to understand a few thing better.
@willvr46 ай бұрын
You know the "Bible" is edited too right? They omitted a bunch of books (you can still find them all) They were also written over the course of 200 years.
@fluffynoses8 жыл бұрын
Bishop Barron would absolutely obliterate Bill Maher intellectually if Maher ever had the guts to invite him on Real Time
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
Bill Maher would never do that. He's the type of person who knows how to pick his fights so he always seems like the smartest person in the room, even when he isn't.
@fluffynoses8 жыл бұрын
***** to be fair, Maher has invited Ross Douthat to his show several times
@williamkniesly50907 жыл бұрын
That is so true.
@williamkniesly50907 жыл бұрын
I agree with you.
@thecanadiantrucker36367 жыл бұрын
not in this life time . fairytales can never win over real science
@elzbietahapsburska371111 жыл бұрын
Same here. I love how Father Barron is a really deep and thorough thinker, and how he tries to see the positive side of everything, the work of God in all places :D
@BishopBarron10 жыл бұрын
How do you "test" the theory that only empirically testable things are true?!
@calc23236 жыл бұрын
You surely know that requires epistemological philosophising.
@peacetrain536 жыл бұрын
Actually, many empirically untestable things things are true. E.g., there may well be sci-fi TV shows on other planets. The question is, how do we distinguish between conjecture and verification? Whereas science distinguishes between conjecture and confirmation, and is continually open to disconfirmation, religion seems to say, "If I want it to be true, and if there is some reason (weak or strong) to say it's true, and if it hasn't been disproven to my satisfaction, then I know it's true."
@killerbing116 жыл бұрын
Well, you live in reality and not live in a rabbit hole from Alice and Wonder Land
@jackdispennett7443 жыл бұрын
@@killerbing11 One must remember that "Only empirically testable things are true" is not, itself, empirically testable, so it is self-defeating. Scientism has to sneak in philosophical statements in order to get off the ground, even though many adherents of scientism seem to diminish the role of philosophy.
@pflubber12 жыл бұрын
It's so awesome when I hear someone put a bunch of my scattered thoughts into an organized, eloquent sequence of arguments. I love this guy!
@Dan0__2 жыл бұрын
I feel exactly the same way!
@mtc112510 жыл бұрын
I'm not religious, but I can definitely respect this.
@mariog14902 жыл бұрын
@@finnpead8477 this is an old thread, but this is the kind of thing that Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson get bogged down by. What is the highest form of truth? The issue with science as a totalizing enterprise is it’s purely propositional. Science makes assumptions and uses it’s methodology. But science doesn’t explain itself. For example, a claim that the universe is intelligible can’t be proved scientifically, because that’s a perspectival claim. Which is why in Plato’s cave, we move from the empirical to the mathematical to the metaphysical. Sure, we can see the shadows, but that means there must be a light source. The most true things are stable. Empiricism doesn’t deal directly with stable forms. Especially from a Darwinian perspective, which is why I brought up Peterson.
@ASKpq7 жыл бұрын
I really, really like that point he makes around 6:30 about surrendering. I was massively into Hitchens -- and I liked the way he portrayed faith as the most despicable master/slave relationship, but I now see that as a distorted way of posing faith. The idea of surrender, the giving up of oneself to allow one to consumed by a profound feeling bigger than oneself, is pretty significant and moving. I'm alright with not forcing myself to be the master of the world anymore.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Friend, honestly, do you think, on the basis of this video, that I would advocate "tent revivals and bible beaters"?! I would much prefer a real counter-argument to this silly name-calling.
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
Well, how do you distinguish the genres of, say, Moby Dick, the Wasteland, and Churchill's history of World War II? Same principles apply to the Biblical texts.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Many parts of Exodus, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, One and Two Samuel, One and Two Kings, Maccabees, the four Gospels, etc.
@orth8210 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the interesting POV, Fr. Barron, and for allowing comments on your vids. So many religious channels on here don't. -a friendly atheist
@infernocanuck8 жыл бұрын
It's a great ideal, to allow yourself to be open to all criticism, the mature, and immature, the kind and the hateful. But, on the other hand, this is a website owned by a private company, in which a user can determine their level of engagement. And frankly, I don't blame channels who dissallow comments. No one should be forced to listen to a litany of immature, cruel words. Alas, due to our base human nature, and the anonymity of the medium, people are more prone to say hurtful things.
@Internetshadow00007 жыл бұрын
Hey thank you for being kind, non-judgmental and not condescending. I really appreciate that! : )
@margaretmurti68457 жыл бұрын
orth82
@margaretmurti68457 жыл бұрын
orth82
@margaretmurti68457 жыл бұрын
orth82
@jonsnuhhhhhhhhh54977 жыл бұрын
Bishop Barron. I just wanted to say you were a huge influence in my life over the last few years. I rejected God and Catholicism as a young man and explored other new age beliefs, divination and eastern philosophies and meditation. I picked up a lot of spiritual knowledge along the way but ended up a complete nihilist. over the last 2 years I started reading the Bible after reading Peter Hitchens book rage against God. I went on a pilgrimage and went to mass for the first time in 18 years. it took a long time to figure it all out after I accepted God. I was more of an agnostic. but just a few weeks ago I had an experience. I went to a hermitage to figure it out. I saw hell in my dream. in the dream I screamed "I need Jesus, I need God!" I woke at 3am shaking. I've had nightmares before but never screamed for somebody or something like this. I'm studying theology and praying everyday along with contemplative prayer which I think caused me to have that dream. i was confronting demons. and I mean that in the most logical way. everyday I wake up I can't stop thinking about Jesus. i think you recommended that I read nt Wright years ago. I'm reading him now and all I can say is that there's so much about Christianity and Catholicism that is so inspiring. i really believe I've been saved. try telling this to my atheist/nihilist self years ago...anyway THANK YOU! GOD BLESS YOU!
@papasmurf61809 жыл бұрын
If death is the end and there is no further significance beyond the grave, why do atheists even care what religious people believe?
@HackersSun9 жыл бұрын
***** and that's why I can't STAND them. ffs, you can choose not to believe, but GOOD GOB LEAVE US ALLOW AND STOP YOUR B***HFORKING. ...buuut they are still lost and loved by god... ...doesn't change I still want to kick them in the teeth >:B
@catesmike9 жыл бұрын
Father Barron, Thank you for all the excellent videos that you've put on the internet to help people understand, know, love, and serve God. I noticed some exceptionally vile comments directed towards the Father. I would pose this question to the people who, not so kindly, disagreed with Father Barron. The question is who is more delusional, someone who believes that the universe formed in such a low entropic state by pure chance or the person who believes that this state that we experience was designed by an intelligent creator? By the way, the odds of the universe forming in its low entropic state is a number, if typed in 10 font, would not even fit in the universe. Food for thought. Thanks.
@irishgypsy2570110 жыл бұрын
The problem is that ALOT of people, especially in the U.S. do look at the bible as literally true.
@eclair415910 жыл бұрын
And whose fault is that?
@irishgypsy2570110 жыл бұрын
Albert Clerc of course it would be their own or the people teaching them. The point is that he is making fun of those people and they're alot of them.
@aescoto152310 жыл бұрын
susan martin no he specifically chose whom he interviewed and simple editing can make anyone look like you want.....in a word dishonest
@irishgypsy2570110 жыл бұрын
A Escoto I agree that editing can make anyone look bad, but in the U.S. there are an overwhelming amount of Christians that take the bible literally. I have only met one or two that didn't.
@jimba648610 жыл бұрын
Tada!!!!! The finest of Protestants who grab their bibles and base churches on whatever they interpret it to be. It's no different then people who misinterpret and not understand what people are saying.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Well of course "the hand of man" is in the Bible, for as Vatican II teaches, "the Bible is the Word of God in the words of men."
@GebreMenfesKidus10 жыл бұрын
This movie was inane. Typical straw man tripe that's not even worth lending credence to. At least Christopher Hitchens - while still relying mostly on straw man arguments - could give some intellectually stimulating reasons for his point of view. I loved the debates he had with William F. Buckley. Those were two intellectually committed men who could engage in serious debate. Dawkins and Maher do nothing but rely on cheap witticisms and straw men.
@elnino279910 жыл бұрын
Exactly.
@NaYawkr10 жыл бұрын
God promised that if you seek, you will find. But a truly sincere heart is required. God is all that mankind seeks, God is perfection in the 3 things man most desires: 1 - Life, and a life that ends is not perfect. God is eternal life. 2- Knowledge and who can deny that the existence of man has been anything but a search for more knowledge. Knowledge is found to perfection only in God; 3- Love, and God is Love, a love so total it used Abraham's trust in God's goodness to the point of obeying the command to sacrifice his one and only beloved son, something God would NOT allow Abraham to endure, but what God Himself endured to love man and save us from our sins.
@E5Bobby9 жыл бұрын
I've often thought what a small box "the science crowd" puts themselves in. Imagine you are dating a person who loves science but doesn't believe in an "immeasurable God". If that person were to say "I love you." all you'd have to say to stump them would be "Prove it. Scientifically." End of discussion. I believe that, in the end it all boils down to Love, which is unquantifiable, which is... God. Never stop searching for Him. In the end you'll discover that He was always right. There. Beside. You. Lo, even in your heart.
@mazymetric82676 жыл бұрын
and God said: "You have offended me. Here, have my son and torture him to death so I can forgive you." Hallelujah!
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Not so! There are 70,000,000 Catholics in America, and we don't read the entire Bible literally.
@geraldtomkins55455 жыл бұрын
First, let's remember Bill Maher is a comedian. He is also a social commentator but he is at least humble enough to say, " I don't know." But he correctly points out, " And you don't know either." To have to "surrender" and "fall in love" to the "mystery" only confirms that "you don't know either."
@a.i.l10747 жыл бұрын
I'm a positive atheist, though I found Religulous tedious. Facetious, arrogant, uninformed...you name it. Father Barron often talks about the catholic church 'at it's best', or 'serious religious people', and I would exclude Bill Maher from serious atheism at it's best. To paraphrase something from your tradition: forgive us our Bill Mahers as we forgive your Ken Hams, amen
@RCardone828 жыл бұрын
Surprisingly, considering the vid title, this is the best description of the Christian faith that I can find on the internet.
@michaelsorensen86705 жыл бұрын
The great philosopher Antony Flew who was a renowned atheist changed his mind came to believe in God so there is hope for Bill Maher. God bless. And keep up the good work Bishop Barron your videos are brilliant.
@jonmkl6 жыл бұрын
I love the people on here like “Oooh NOW the Bible is a library and YOU get to decide what’s literal??” Literally there are books in the Bible that are called “histories” books that are called “prophecies” and books that are distinctly poetry or and law. Each book defines _itself_ in its introduction and structure. He’s not saying _he_ gets to decide what’s literal, he is saying that the books themselves define that. Corinthians is a letter Isaiah is a prophesy Psalms is prophetic poetry Chronicles is a history book Acts is a first hand account Genesis is basically the _only_ book about which there is _any_ contention about how literally we should take it in the church. The status of every other book is unquestioned.
@BishopBarron6 жыл бұрын
Segata Jonshiro Excellent! Thanks.
@vejeke5 жыл бұрын
I wonder what do you think of a KZfaq video called "The Gospel of Luke [The Alternative Facts gospel]" For most people that video has served to open their eyes, but there are also people who can not handle the content and they opt to double down. In any case it's an interesting video and I'd like to know what your thoughts are after watching it.
@fritula62005 жыл бұрын
Brilliant answer!
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Nonsense! In reparation for this deeply inadequate post, I require you to read the book of Job. It will show you a way past the false dilemma you have posed.
@F84Thunderjet10 жыл бұрын
In my years in Catholic school taught by nuns and priests, the Bible was presented as literally true. Emphasis was on fear and guilt. The descriptions of purgatory and hell kept us kids running to confession every Saturday especially after puberty and the onset of sexual thoughts. Pope Pius the XII made certain that every Catholic school kid in the world learned about the vivid description of hell told to the Fatima children - human forms like glowing coals...shrieks and groans of pain...etc.
@BishopBarron10 жыл бұрын
I'm truly sorry about that. You had a very poor Catholic formation.
@rsmyth7510 жыл бұрын
Fr. Robert Barron Poor formation, Father? With the collapse of morality in society in the last 50yrs u don't see a correlation! this society is a cesspool of immorality and I think, where would i be if i hadn't thought of those glowing human forms when severely tempted!!! One example, as a kid, the Church was filled at every Mass on Sunday, Today? Well u would think that with all the changes to make it "easier"... the fact is fewer and fewer r coming! why? i asked myself one Sunday. Why do I come? As a believer many reasons came to mind. But the first one was the fear of eternal damnation in the "fires of Hell". Words by the way I hadn't herd come out of a priest's mouth in, let me see, 50yrs!!! Coincidence? I don't believe in them! You know the old saying, father! This is what happens when u throw the baby out with the bath water! As a child I was taught that what i did in this life was a matter of eternal Life and death! What has changed? Mortal Sin is still Mortal!!! Didn't u use the analogy of raising a child when reading and understanding the old and new testament. That was very helpful to me and my understanding of scripture. It is also true in real life. If we don't tell the child the oven is hot and they do it anyway at least they will know we were telling the truth and will listen the next time. I guess what i'm saying, is we still have an obligation and a duty to form the children up in the knowledge of what will send them to the Oven, of what will send them to eternal Life or Death.God bless you!
@F84Thunderjet10 жыл бұрын
rsmyth75 So the main reason you go to mass each Sunday is “the fear of eternal damnation in the fires of hell”. And you are commanded to love a god that threatens children with eternal excruciating pain for committing any of a long list of church invented “sins” during their brief life here on Earth. What were some of those sins that could send a child as young as age seven (the Catholic Church’s definition of the “age of reason”)? Deliberately missing mass on Sunday or a Holy Day of Obligation; eating meat on Friday; masturbation or just holding on to a sexual thought for more than a nanosecond (major reason post puberty boys lined up at the confessional every Saturday);etc. were all considered mortal sins worthy of an eternity in hell-fire. Oh, and Catholics are taught that God is all just! According to Catholic teaching, hell is crowded with children who died in a swimming or bicycle or automobile or some other kind of accident before getting to confession prior to confessing their so-called mortal sin. The fact that fear of burning forever in hell is still your “first” reason for going to mass demonstrates the power of fear-based indoctrination of children. You were subjected to psychological child abuse. You forgot to mention Purgatory that was alleged to be the same kind of torture as hell only it didn't last forever. Do you remember all those indulgences people sought to lessen their time in Purgatory? Do you remember praying for your grandparents, parents, brothers, sisters, children, etc who were burning in Purgatory? Do you remember praying for all "the poor souls in Purgatory"? Do you still believe that?
@richsmyth864010 жыл бұрын
Hawker Seafury just because u no longer believe doesn't mean it's not true!!! By the way according to catholic teaching, no one not even the Pope can say who is in hell!!! It is also psychological[y unhealthy and eternally unsafe to justify ur immoral sinful behavior by condemning the church's teaching by misrepresenting it!!!
@F84Thunderjet10 жыл бұрын
Rich Smyth You state: “Just because you no longer believe doesn’t mean it’s not true!”. That’s right. And just because you can’t prove there isn’t an invisible dragon living in your neighborhood doesn’t mean it’s not true. By and large negatives can’t be proven. Starting with Santa Claus and the tooth fairy, as we grow up we learn (hopefully), to evaluate the plausibility of certain claims. A developing ability to reason should lead one to conclude that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Threatening me to believe by characterizing my comment as “eternally unsafe” is the same tactic that the Church traditionally relied upon to keep people “faithful”. And as previous poster rsmyth75 stated in the earlier post, even after 50 years, his main reason for going to mass every Sunday is fear of hell. Threatening children with eternal punishment in hell or almost certain punishment in purgatory is a particularly evil practice that the Catholic Church used to coerce and brainwash young children. It was psychological child abuse. That was the principle method of persuasive indoctrination used in Catholic schools prior to -Vatican II. During the Holy Year (1950) Pope Pius XII made sure every Catholic school child was made aware of the Fatima vision of hell: “..it were, a vast sea of fire. Plunged in this fire, we saw the demons and the souls [of the damned]. The latter were like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, having human forms. They were floating about in that conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames which issued from within themselves, together with great clouds of smoke. Now they fell back on every side like sparks in huge fires, without weight or equilibrium, amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fright…”. You claimed that I misrepresented the Catholic Church’s teaching. Please be specific as I have the pre-Vatican II Catechism (used in my Catholic school and all Catholic schools) and can provide the specific quotes supporting everything I said. The pre-Vatican II Sunday Missal is available online showing the many indulgences offered throughout the liturgical year by participating in novenas, Stations of the Cross, etc. Each indulgence would include the number of days the time in purgatory would be reduced by participating in the specified ritual. And purgatory was claimed to be suffering by fire just like hell. Catholic “faith” was grounded in fear. Rsmyth75’s previous post corroborates that fact in expressing his main reason for going to mass as fear of hell. Listening to Barron’s videos leads me to conclude that coercive teaching has been de-emphasized since Vatican II. Most Catholics raised subsequent to Vatican II haven’t a clue as to what it was like to grow up in that Church in the early to mid-twentieth century.
@Audrey.1Ай бұрын
Thank You Bishop Barron, you say a great deal of insightful things that I had to get a notebook handy when I listen to you!
@northyorksimonkim8 жыл бұрын
Excellent, God bless you Father Rob
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Only married people have experienced love?!
@Chilly99410 жыл бұрын
As Bill Maher is judge the second that he dies and realizes he's made fun of, mocked, desecrated all that is holy, his sinfull ass will not be laughing then
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Not so! Catholicism stands athwart fundamentalism. As I've said many times, Maher blithely identified "religion" as such with a deeply corrupt form of religion. That's like taking creationism and simply identifying it with science.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
No. It's not "code" for anything. It's a description of how responsible Biblical readers go about their work. What you have done is, in fact, cherry-picking, that is, taking bits and pieces of what I've said and constructing a criticism on that basis.
@raymondgilbert134110 жыл бұрын
I would like to see Maher make a movie in which he interviews Barron, Craig and Polkinghorn, and their ilk. Now, that would be comedy. He doesn't have the balls for it, but it would be far more substantial than the drivel he committed to film.
@momon18289 жыл бұрын
bill maher show is like watching professorial wrestling
@KenPaulsenArchitect5 жыл бұрын
WOW! EXCELLENT EXPLANATION! I'm continually impressed with Bishop Barron. He nailed it again!!!
@jenniferwinston78426 жыл бұрын
I love Bishop Barron.... His work is excellent and I'm in great need of his discussions. We need this logic and truth.
@mattjazzfan22886 жыл бұрын
I’m an agnostic atheist, and I absolutely loved your review of this movie
@b11jiral632 жыл бұрын
You should try learning more about the Catholic Faith but don't speak ill of her for the sex scandals, Spanish Inquisition and corruption of some past clergymen and the some evil popes (anti-popes) because their actions don't represent the nature of her and the conviction of the Apostle successions and the role of Papacy and the mindset of the all the good faithful.
@markschoenhofer862711 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Fr. Barron. This is an incredibly well thought-out response to a dangerous film. More importantly, it represents truth.
@connorkent72202 жыл бұрын
Mark Schoenhofer WRONG the danger is in believing in religion! The Catholic Church is the worst
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
God bless you!
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
I did watch Zeitgeist and made a video criticizing it. Why would you think that God can only use history or journalism as the literary vehicles of his truth?
@logicreasonevidence75719 жыл бұрын
Hey yeah! 'Faith' isn't the polar opposite of rationality it's 'supra-rational'! Yeah yeah yeah... more word salad from Fr. Barron. Falling in love may or may not be rational. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with emotion per se but if it trumps true rationalism you've got problems because any love that isn't rational as well isn't actually love at all.
@sjh606337 жыл бұрын
Maher isn't an atheist. He believes in God, he just is angry at God for whatever reason.
@BishopBarron7 жыл бұрын
I do think that's right.
@mathewkanter94587 жыл бұрын
Bishop Robert Barron Wow, even you would stoop down to that level... What a shame.
@scarboroughstudio6 жыл бұрын
You're the measuring stick here? Clearly you have the chip firmly placed on your shoulder, because that's the first thing I took from Maher, then seeing the film as an atheist myself. I'm not, nor do I assume the previous posts are as well, arrogant to make such a blanket claim, but it's most definitely a fair thought. Maher is SO vehemently entrenched in his stance that it's all but impossible to wonder, why? My God, this film is hardly a documentary as it an a 2 hour snarky KZfaq comment section tribute. Bill I'm sure believes what he says, but it does seem he's struggling with something, and it's not his "knowing" there is no God.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
That's simply not true. Richly imaginative, non-literalistic readings of the Bible have been on offer since the second century. Take a look at the writings of Justin Martyr, Origen, and Augustine, to name just a few of the most prominent.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Then attack them; but don't attack religion as such.
@bjanman110 жыл бұрын
In 2012 I posted one simple question to 347 atheist websites; do you believe that intelligent life exists on other planets? My post directed them to a KZfaq/Vimeo video about current scientific estimates about how many planets exist in the universe. The results from 1,243 respondents was that 73% of respondents believe that intelligent life exists on other planets in the universe. There is currently no scientific evidence that suggests the possibility that even simple life forms exist on other planets, let alone intelligent life. But, 73% of self-identified atheist respondents believe that intelligent life does exist on other planets in the universe. 73% OF ATHEISTS ARE PEOPLE OF FAITH. THEY ARE PERFECTLY WILLING TO BELIEVE WITHOUT ONE SHRED OF SCIENTIFIC EVEIDENCE. Turns out that atheists are actually practicing the theology of scientism!
@MrJwak6710 жыл бұрын
*sighs* you understand the sample size you're using is way too small and isn't a round number (multiples of 10) to use statistically. Also you need to understand that the likelihood that other intelligent is incredibly high right? currently it is estimated that around 500 million planets within this solar system alone is within the Goldilock's zone (the zone orbiting around a star in which life can be sustained.) So is life possible on other planets, yes. Is intelligent life possible on other planets? possibly. Do we know? No.
@michaelmarvin946310 жыл бұрын
He should stop trying to criticize Bill Maher and start criticizing the creationists who believe the world is 5000-6000 years old and evolution is a fraud. I understand he doesn't like Bill, but the source to Bill's complaints is the creationists. If creationism went away, we wouldn't have anything to complain about. Creationists are the ones who are trying to push religion into schools.
@arieltd783 жыл бұрын
These are excellent points. A few days ago I was watching a documentary with my 5th grade students on the creation of Earth, great video. At the end, one of them asked me: "Mr. T, if this is how Earth was created, why do theyr teach different things in religiom class?" I couldn't answer.... I just said: "This video is not to offend or change anyone's point of view or beliefs, it's just what scientists have discovered so far." I hope I did the right thing.
@MidsierramusingBlogspot11 жыл бұрын
Fr. Barron, I enjoy watching your videos. Your irenic responses help to disarm many of the church critics. Fr. Dale Matson (Anglican)
@shawnsattler156110 жыл бұрын
Nice attempt of explaining the nonsense in the bible. Oh you have to wear the right lenses to read certain passages correctly, that's great, still bullshit though. Jonah lived in a whale? Of course that's poetry, Jesus is god and rose to heaven? Oh we know that part is real, c'mon.
@BishopBarron10 жыл бұрын
Friend, try to avoid the all-or-nothing approach to a text as complex and variegated as the Bible. Is it all history? No. Is it therefore all poetry or legend? No. Look for clues within the structure of the text itself, which will tell you how to read it. Do you read Hamlet the same way you read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich?
@vladtepes96149 жыл бұрын
shawn sattler "Jonah lived in a whale? Of course that's poetry, Jesus is god and rose to heaven? Oh we know that part is real, c'mon." You stole the words from my mouth. That's like saying "Of course the Kraken is mythological, silly. But Zeus throwing lightning from the heavens? TOTALLY real."
@vladtepes96149 жыл бұрын
Elias Lucero I'm an agnostic atheist. I care about what can be objectively demonstrated. Possibilities are just that. Possibilities. Sure, there are things that I believe to be true for various reasons. For example, I believe that alien life most likely exists due to the vast number of planets and galaxies, but I would never claim that it's a fact due to the lack of solid evidence. That would be intellectually dishonest of me.
@vladtepes96149 жыл бұрын
Elias Lucero I think that IF there is a god(s) / prime mover / creator force of some type, then everyone has it wrong. All "holy" books can be demonstrated to be flawed on multiple levels, granted that certain texts are more erroneous than others. They can't all be right, but they can all be wrong. That said, if the world truly operated in the manner that these ancient texts describe, then life would be like a Lord Of The Rings novel. I don't believe in magic, ergo I don't believe the contents of religious writings.
@vladtepes96149 жыл бұрын
Elias Lucero "But that's my take anyway, have a good one." You too. Nice little chat :)
@nickymaconline9 жыл бұрын
Sound like excuses
@BishopBarron9 жыл бұрын
No. It's a clarification.
@nickymaconline9 жыл бұрын
Meh....
@nickymaconline9 жыл бұрын
Fr. Robert Barron I did find it funny how you said "the only intelligent person" was the Catholic guy. Lulz. Good to know that Catholicism is still an us-against-them theology.
@nickymaconline9 жыл бұрын
Oh, that's judging people. But the collar gives you special powers though so....
@RebeccaRider11 жыл бұрын
Thank you Friar! You are literally a breath of fresh air in the KZfaq sea of Penn Jillette, Bill Maher, and other entertaining atheists I probably listen to too often. Thank you for reminding me why I believe what I do!!
@AscendantJustice130811 жыл бұрын
Hey Fr. Barron, I'm not sure if you'll get this comment. But if you do I want to let you know that you're awesome and that I really appreciate the work you do with Word on Fire, as well as with the Catholicism project and with these videos. I was able to use a lot of your videos in order to relate to others and they've helped edify me. I'm praying for you and your ministry and those involved in it! Thank you and God bless!
@ksb205010 жыл бұрын
Great video Father! I know it's 6 years old now but it's still being passed about. It's very well thought out. I'll share it myself as well so it'll keep being passed.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Which is precisely why the Bible has to be read "in the church," which is to say, a disciplined tradition of interpretation. Luther's move to give the Bible to everyone to interpret according to his or her wits was, to say the very least, problematic.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
I know, I know. People keep trotting that survey out. But there are lots of others which speak otherwise. And just take a look at John Polkinghorne (Cambride particle physicist and Anglican priest), Georges LeMaitre (formulator of the Big Bang theory and a Catholic priest), Stanley Jaki (distinguished physicist and Benedictine monk) and many others. But finally, friend, this thing can't be determined by pols, only by argument. Engage mine.
@JRyanYM8611 жыл бұрын
Amen Father. God Bless You!!! I have professed this truth over and over again at my University and to my friends. Truth is not opposed to faith or reason and it does not set faith against reason or vice versa. Truth is a blessed union, a marriage, between two lovers; Faith and Reason. God made it so that we may know him and truly experience his Love, cooperating with it and his will to the best of our ability this side of eternity. Amen I say to you Father and may the peace of God be upon you.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Well, I disagree with your premise that it's an either/or. I would say that the other great religions contain very profound truths indeed, but that Catholicism contains the fullness of truth necessary for salvation. I further disagree that there is no "evidence" for one perspective over another. Take a look at my videos on God's existence, and you'll find some of the evidence that supports the Christian view of God.
@canadienbaka993811 жыл бұрын
you and bill Maher on live TV for 10 min. AWSOME!
@punk33885 жыл бұрын
Thank you Father for defending our faith. All Catholics must defend our faith. The first step is to study and learn our faith.
@flannelflower30366 жыл бұрын
You explain this so well. Thank you 🙏.
@MariaRamirez-jm3cj4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Brilliant explanation!!!! Thank God for Bishop Barron!!!
@RS-uh7rz2 ай бұрын
15 years later, this is still an excellent explanation and defense of religion.
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
Falling in love involves reason--otherwise, it is puppy-love. But it necessarily goes beyond reason, for reason cannot possibly grasp it in its richness and complexity. This is the analogy to faith in God, which does indeed have a rational dimension. But does anyone really think that God can be fully grasped by the mind?!
@Fersomling9 жыл бұрын
Hi, Your Grace Bishop Barron! Your Grace, have you ever met Fr. Benedict Groeschel? If so, can you tell us an anecdote about Fr. Groeschel? Thanks!
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Well isn't that convenient for you! All the wicked things that religious people have done were done precisely because of their religion, but none of the wicked things that atheists have done were done because of their atheism. Why don't we just say that human beings are a bad lot. Both believers and non-believers do terrible things. Fine. Now let's get back to serious argument and drop the useless psychologizing.
@mq16915 ай бұрын
My first reaction to Bill M is one of feeling sad for him that he is choosing to block God's love (mostly by ignorant childish jokes that remind me of when my kids were in their early teens....how old is he?) which is why I do not believe in the death penalty....give a person every moment of their natural life on this planet to open that door that God is knocking on. Bishop Barron you never cease to amaze me, I have only been following you for a few months, along with Father Mike and Jordan Peterson (that conversation with the three of you was awesome!) and I can only say that listening to your reasoning along with your faith leaves me always yearning to learn more. Thank you.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
The point you're missing, I'm afraid, is that Maher simply identified the crudest forms of fundamentalism with "religion" as such. If he had called his movie "Fundamentaligulous," I wouldn't have had much of a quarrel with it.
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
Sure. But the flatness of the earth is still the simplest explanation of all the data. My point is simply that we shouldn't make a fetish of Occam's razor. What matters, finally, is not the simplest explanation but the most correct one.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
The term is "supra-rational," meaning beyond yet inclusive of reason. Do you really think that reason utterly grasps the whole of reality? Do you really think that there is no dimension of being that we intuit or sense on the far side of reason? As for scientists, you might inquire of John Polkinghorne, Cambridge particle physicist and Anglican priest, or you might read the work of Georges LeMaitre, formulator of the Big Bang theory and Catholic priest.
@BishopBarron12 жыл бұрын
The difference is profound. Maher thinks that they are somehow representative of Christianity; I'm saying that they are aberrational.
@tthomaselli211 жыл бұрын
A former Christian who's now an Agnostic (Bill Mahr) inviting a Christian (Father Barron) to his show... I don't think so.
@PraetorClaudius6 жыл бұрын
I'll bet so many "Christians" downvoted this without a shred of education. Fundamentalism is what happens when common folk can't understand Thomas Payne and need a literal philosophy to go by to feel safe. Muh 6000 year universe...
@jerelsalazar79597 жыл бұрын
Aloha, Bishop Barron! This directly correlates to the topic you discussed at the CoCathedral when you were here in Honolulu. The simplification or dumbing down of Catholicism for purpoted easier digestion for the masses, provide fodder for people like Maher who need easy pickings and showboat their dissection of people's faith; people specially selected by his production due to their inability to articulate the faith. Mr. Maher didn't leave anything to chance. I do believe that if more dialogue in your intellectual level of our Catholic faith is disseminated aside from the Catholic Cliff's notes condensation, it would somehow make its way to the collective understanding of our Catholic faithful. I commend how you gathered the topics and your explanations; topics that are vital because these are the subjects that are always asked of us and any inability to present a coherent description and explanation are somehow presented as proof of the faith's frailty. I remember that even as a child, i had an innate feeling that science and mathematics PROVED the presence of Divinity even though i couldn't explain why. And with today's scientific discoveries, in the Quantum realm of studies for example, almost every physicist acknowledges they're starting to graze the boundary of science and spirituality, in the sense that their experiments are showing the first hints of deliberate, conscious and intelligent intent and order. Anyway, before i ramble more, i am happy to learn more about our faith through your dialogues, Bishop Barron! Aloha and God bless you!
@BishopBarron7 жыл бұрын
Well Aloha to you! Thanks for these reflections. I loved my time in Hawaii.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
Well of course religion makes claims that are "independent of the magisterium of science." So does philosophy. So in its own way does poetry, mysticism as well. There are a variety of ways of knowing reality. The mistake of scientism--which you exhibit--is that all knowledge is reduced to the scientific modality of knowledge.
@AdmiralPrice9 жыл бұрын
I love your perspectives, Father Barron, as a practicing Muslim. God talks about the theistic "scientist," if you will, as one who tries to discover God in his signs: Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding. Who remember Allah while standing or sitting or [lying] on their sides and give thought to the creation of the heavens and the earth, [saying], "Our Lord, You did not create this aimlessly; exalted are You [above such a thing]; then protect us from the punishment of the Fire. (3:190 - 191)
@ipso-kk3ft9 жыл бұрын
AdmiralPrice I gotta say, we Christians look up to you. You gotta respect the devotion and discipline of Islam on scripture and its study. Something neat to emulate. :))
@idicula19799 жыл бұрын
I'm A big fan of Bill Maher, but he is wrong on religion. The only reason why religion is portrayed as it is, is because to many people especially on the right use religion to infantilizecause themselves to an ever evolving world.
@BishopBarron11 жыл бұрын
What it actually shows is how dangerous it is to read the Bible apart from the discipline of an interpretive community, that is to say, the Church. Would you trust just anyone to pick up Hamlet or Macbeth and give you the most reliable and sophisticated interpretations of those texts? Why would we think such a method would work in regard to the Bible?
@RGTomoenage116 жыл бұрын
I have a really serious question. I have heard a number of priests say that Genesis is not literal. If Genesis isn't literal, what happens with the original sin? That trumps the whole idea of the original sin, including our bauptism. The original sin is the whole reason why we are bauptised as children. The priest said we come from monkeys so if there was no Adam. What happenscto original sin?
@TheJewishCatholic3 жыл бұрын
Well put!
@MarijuanaFireFighter6 жыл бұрын
I'm a lapsed Catholic/atheist and I love Father Coyne. I've recently discovered Bishop Barron and I've become obsessed. I have read and listened to a lot of the "new atheist" materials and I think it's important to hear from the other side from intelligent people whom I respect. Bishop Barron is a great voice to listen to for that perspective. Part of me wants, yearns even, to believe in God. I just don't think I can bring myself to believe. I was educated by Jesuits and they have had a huge impact on my development as a person, almost entirely positive. I can see the positive things that come from religion - I also see the negative. But I don't think the positives (or negatives) can be used for justifying whether or not the truth of what religion promulgates. I'm also a fan of Fr James Martin and his book, The Jesuit Guide to (almost) Everything. Even as an atheist, it is insightful and helpful. But I am brought back to the same line of thinking - even if these practices can be helpful, that doesn't necessarily make them true. There are so many things that I have to wrestle with, as I quite often find myself in complete disagreement with Church teachings.
@brahilly6 жыл бұрын
Well, I'm a lot like you, but at the age of 67 I now commit myself to taking on the task of opening my mind and heart to the Mystery of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I may never get to really know what I've been looking for in the way of Knowledge, but as the light begins to illuminate my personal darkness, I have a deep sense that this is, finally, the right thing to do. God bless.
@mguz8710 жыл бұрын
Father Barron, thanks for the clarification....you are BRILLIANT!!!
@baconraptor42011 жыл бұрын
Father Barron and Bill Maher need to sit down and have a talk. I would pay to see that
@anthonychoueifati8119 жыл бұрын
You are amazing! Thank you for explaining. :)
@edmundlim9751 Жыл бұрын
I see Bill Maher as the doubting Thomas. As long as he continues to doubt, his search will not be in vain... Thank you Bishop for setting out the framework for us to get there faster than it otherwise would
@j.griffy21284 жыл бұрын
There’s so many dislikes and negative comments, yet there isn’t a single thing the Bishop said that’s unreasonable.
@BishopBarron4 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the wonderful world of social media com-boxes!
@j.griffy21284 жыл бұрын
Bishop Robert Barron Well-said, your excellency. Keep up the good work though. Your videos mean the world to people like me who constantly struggle with their faith.