But he supports divorce and contraception...

In general Anglican churches (whether part of the Anglican Communion or not) recognise as fellow Christians those people who are members of churches which subscribe to the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity (i.e. belief in one God who is three coeternal and coequal persons). Sadly the Mormon church (Church of Jesus Christ LDS) does not subscribe to this doctrine so cannot be regarded as a Trinitarian Christian denomination.

That should be obvious 🙂I can think of dozens of differences between what mormons and Christians believe.

Christians do not believe God is an exalted man with a wife and Jesus is the spirit brother of Satan...those are Mormon teachings

If that is what your history books have told you, I’d look for a new textbook. Double-check your facts, please.

@@Apriluser What is not fact about that? King Henry VIII was the founder of your religion, when he was not allowed by pope a divorce, he declared himself as the head of the Church in England that later on became Church of England to what is now Anglicanism. Easy as 1, 2, 3...simple history that you can find even in most simple text book.

@@jboycaceres2871 An interesting comment. What Henry the 8th actually did was latch on to elements of the Reform movement which had been under way for many years. Initially he was against Luther's document which argued against buying indulgences from the Pope. He even wrote a rebuttal underlining ' The Seven Sacraments' and was certainly Catholic in many of his worship practices. After the separation from Rome and his marriage to Ann Boleyn he still held his daily prayer service in Latin for example. He did bring into circulation the 'Great Bible' - a translation by Tyndale later revised by Coverdale which allowed those who could read to read the bible without the intermediary of a priest. However , when he died the country could be said to be leaning towards Reform , but still more Catholic in practice. The Anglican church has always been a mixture of the two with other church movements being fostered in it or absorbed by it. Even a King like Henry could not have imposed such a huge church change in England if the time hadn't been ripe and the Reform movements well under way. Unfortunately many books on history only give the bare bones of the story - the cancellation of the Pope's jurisdiction in England, Henry's marriage, his proclamation as Head of the Church . Study of the documents of the time including Henry and Ann's Book of Hours , Henry's scroll and the work of Historians at places such as the British Museum reveal a clearer picture of how the Anglican Church was established and the context. King Henry's desire for a divorce just made things move quicker , but it really wasn't a 1 2 3 situation .

@@Tenortalker In short and to summarize your article, he was an opportunist and sexual deviant who led his people astray and to almost damnation today. He separated from Rome, and from a Catholic point of view, his Church's sacraments are invalid.

And your “ultimate arbiter” wants priestesses and “radical inclusivity”. Btw Henry was a committed Roman Catholic to his dying breath, and he wanted an annulment, not a divorce. He also wasn’t the founder of the Anglican Church.

It is the Church in Wales and not the Church of Wales because the Church in Wales was disestablished in 1920 by the Welsh Wizard David Lloyd Thomas that has enabled the Welsh church to hold services in English and Welsh like the Welsh Chapels and the Bishops nolonger sit in the House of Lords only the Arch Bishop when he is invited to to represent Wales

You might have had a point, but the reality is it was the sinners who left their sins to follow Jesus Christ, not Jesus Christ affirming sinners to continue in their preferred sin. The con-game being played by the liberal revisionist voices under the guise of tolerance, inclusion, diversity, etc., is really a manipulative expectation to condone sinful conduct. Apostate and heretics are always identified by their obsessions with three things: 1. Power 2. Money 3. Sex Considering the facts that the so many of the liberal bishops are associated with: 1. Corrupt power, more concerned with pleasing a liberal secular government. 2. Worried about their future money (when 80% of the laity no longer follows these wolves in sheeps clothing the paychecks and pensions dry up fast.) 3. Are majority identified as affirming sexual practices which Scripture has condemned since the Book of Genesis. The time for true Christians to leave and form a new Church is way overdue.

Jesus never endorsed or blessed sin. He told the woman caught in adultery to “go and sin no more”.

The fundamental spirit of scripture is that God loved the world like this: He gave his only Son (Jesus), so that whoever puts their faith and trust in Him will not condemn themselves to eternal separation from God, but will inherit eternal life in God’s kingdom. Welcoming outcasts etc is contingent on first being inheritors of the kingdom through faith in Jesus. And faith comes through believing the Word of God.