You sure that's not his brother? Hahah

Got even weirder when he lost his hair, grew a beard and changed his name to reed

I didn't even notice that. I'm still amazed with how he's able to film in space without a suit 🤯

lmao

That was a funny comment but then after reading it a second time I realized the physics of it are wrong. for the effects of time dilation to be so noticeable as to make Frank look physically younger would require that this effect apply to one of you more than the other. In other words you would have to significantly increase the distance between the two observers. This effect is really significant enough that if not accounted for, our GPS and satellite tech would be constantly off track and unreliable. The atomic clocks both up there at on the ground are constantly being adjusted to make sure they match. Think of it like daylight savings except that you’re either always gaining time or losing it relatively speaking based on your distance from the other person making the measurement. Yeah I’m thinking about interstellar now too!

Yeah that messed with me when he said that, like literally never heard "Milkomeda," which doesn't really make sense anyway. Milkdromeda not only makes more sense given the names of the colliding galaxies, it also sounds way better.

I was thinking the same :P

As long as we are in a stable orbit around it, it's nothing to worry about. I mean other than not having a sun etc lol

Yeah. That distance is only off by a factor of 2 billion or so. 1 AU vs. 1.65 billion AU or 0.000016 light year vs. 26,000 light years

@@optodata Well the distance is off, but in the end a black hole isn't some monster that just eats everything (well it does but it's like any other object with gravity) since you have to be close enough to fall in for it to be "bad" as it were :P

For once I'm thankful we're not on the metric system. Just think how much closer we'd be versus miles.

This needs more likes

Hahaha cute! These are the kinds of Jokes my father made when he was alive

He was a good man oh in his heart. He struggled with great anxiety and a pretty bad case of bipolar while he was alive and so the poor guy really had some weight on his shoulders. I focus on the positives he brought to my life and family. He had an incredible work ethic, loved to look at culture and how to self cultivate. He was a man of countless mediocre jokes but incredible laughs. One of the easiest laughs in the world perhaps this man had. Patrick was his name. He died of brain cancer in 2010. Apparently he slipped away unconscious in his sleep with what I believe would’ve been a morphine drip for the pain. That’s how I would like to die. That piece will kind of end because we made up before he passed. You never know when death‘s toll will toll for you so I assume truly the last time you say goodbye to a loved one or good night to a loved one, say it as though you may never see them again. In this life at least. Before pressing submit I cannot deal with the dissonance in the epigram I just used about death tolling for you! ;) apparently the only bells associated with death that would ring would be for dead ringers. People who were buried around 170 years ago on this continent of North America. These people were assumed dead but then wake up in coffins with a small string attached to a branch with a bell on it leading all the way down to the coffin. If it tolled for you, then what you’re actually doing is looking for somebody who is still alive but was presumed dead and was erroneously buried. See the conflict? Lol

well if you get too close to the earth you'll get sucked in.

@@singletona082 Who is this "earth" you are talking about? I should pay her a visit... *badum tss*

@@singletona082 What they mean is that unless your orbital trajectory actually leads inside the black hole you won't enter it. Even if you fall towards a black hole and just missed the even horizon you'd just continue orbiting it. While a path with less tangential velocity could fall in even from further away. This is techniquely not true for the earth because passing through the atmosphere around the earth slows spacecraft eventually causing them to fall back to earth (the ISS feels drag this way for example which is the main reason we need to send it fuel regularly). tldr: rocket science is complicated who would have guessed. The main point though is that there's not a set distance at which you get "sucked in" rather you have to give up enough energy to have your path intersect the surface (only true when orbiting but I can't be bothered to explain the subtleties). For a human understandable example think of a coin on one of those funnel donation things won't enter the hole until it's lost most of it's angular momentum due to friction with the wall to fall off the wall. Whether that's a straight shot into the hole or, a long spiral as it slowly makes it's way down. (Just to clarify in space the object slow down unless it's passing through an atmosphere or hitting something else it'll just keep following the same orbit forever.

Quite typical of Americans to use poor terminology. I couldn't tell you how many times I've been annoyed by some American saying "the human race".

Yeahh the writer dropped the ball on that one. Things can *fall* in if they end up inside the ISCO of a black hole, but not sucked in. They're not vacuums. Shame shame

Also the event horizon is not the point of spegetification.

Also Ton 618 is the biggest known blackhole at 66 billion x the mass of the sun.

And the galaxy doesn't orbit Sagittarius A*. I was very disappointed in the accuracy of this video.

93,000,000 mi is the distance between the Sun and Earth. Someone goofed.

bless u

Yes, the galaxy doesn't orbit around El Monstro. It orbits around the central mass at the center of galaxy. With the Dark Matter reefs that surround the central mass and the rest of galaxy controlling how it behaves.

I can always tell, like myself, those who watch all the bh videos on KZfaq there is to offer, lol. They're just my absolute favorite, astronomically speaking.

@@MrEnjoivolcom1 When it comes to black holes, my favorite videos are: -" What would we see if we fell into a Black Hole? " By Science Clic Eglish. That one covers what general relativity says would happen, and also my favorite channel on youtube for general physics topics. -" Mapping the Multiverse " by PBS spacetime which explores the weird and whacky world of spinning black holes, and what the Penrose diagram says would happen if you fell into it.

I don’t understand what’s going on. Have Sci-Show Space videos always been this inaccurate and filled with cases of them falling victim to common misconceptions and I’ve just never noticed? I thought they had researchers working on the scientific accuracy of these scripts.

The biggest supermassive black holes are so spatially huge you could cross the event horizon and fall for a while before tidal forces become extreme. At least according to relativity alone.

@@qzbnyv its a compliation of old clips. They should have made the corrections though.

I don’t understand how such an error gets through quality control…

@@sondre5174 it really is a clown moment.

Was about to comment the same. The closest black hole I’m aware of is Cygnus X1 at “only” 6,070 light-years from us.

@@sondre5174 judge from Hank’s age, it was the very early stage of scishow

Was gonna say the same thing. 93M miles is 1 AU or the average distance to our own sun.

Usually they do. Hmm

You can't even thumb it down to show your displeasure anymore either lol.

Putting compilation in the title must be lowering the number of vizualizations so they are hiding it to "cheat" the youtube's algorithm. Also, you still can thumb down. They still can see the number of dislikes, we, viewers, are the only ones that cant see it

pretty easy to tell the compilations from the standard videos. :) The compilations are always around 25 to 35 long or so. No other type of video they have done in their standard content are nearly that long. at most 10 or 15 minutes average, with many falling under the 10 minute marker and quite a few ending up even under the five minute marker.

Also, Unless they have changed it since you originally posted your comment, it actually DOES say "Compilation" lol

I think he said solar system. Does the galaxy move in the direction of a super cluster?

@@kuntamdc Even that would be incorrect, the mass of the black hole would be insufficient to coerce an orbit out of the solar system given it's current distance from it and relative velocity. It is important to remember that galactic supermassive black holes often contain just a tiny portion of their galaxy's mass, and therefore do not act as gravitational anchors like the Sun does for the solar system. For the most part, the galaxy orbits itself.

@@kuntamdc nope. he said galaxy at least twice.

@@thetrashman5252 considering, though, layman are only just recently clueing into the fact that electrons don't orbit the nucleus like planets do.

Agreed, however that energy is purely residual. After the point it can be considered a white dwarf there is no new energy production. In fact all reactions available to a white dwarf will actually speed its cooling; I.e. Further iron production (the actual point of any star's death) who's atoms are so heavy it requires energy to fuse instead of having the excess usually driving effects like light production.

@@kevinmay7935 Yes, but that's irrelevant to my point.

Luckily our does and since we most likely exist another 50.000 Years we have the Technology to keep it Healthy. Since we are a part of it, the Universe has even far more advanced ways to keep itself healthy/kill itself. Imagine you build a Home which creates *tiny* creatures that keeps the house in check so they keep existing.

And this is exactly the most likely danger of a black hole. We are lucky that Sag A* isn't eating anything right now but I wonder how often it does and what affect it has on us.

Compilation Hank is a little behind on the times

Compilation Hank is a little behind on the times.

Good question. I like Reed hosting. :)

They mentioned a while back SciShow Space was being dramatically cut. Can't recall the exact reasons, I just remember Hank & Reed stating there would be less of them.

Gotcha. Thanks for the information. Sucks that it got the backseat treatment.

Enthusiast, not expert: I think one of the problems is 'shouldn't the Universe have been a black hole'; there's no easy way to figure black holes can form from deviations in the early Universe that doesn't permit the whole thing from collapsing.