And I hope they also add an "i" card Then find a way to turn it all into, simply put, a -1

Like it’s a three but if you bust it decreases by one?

@@Leekodot15nah, i should be a 1 that becomes a negative 1 if you bust.

​@@tonyhakston536I think it should be 0 when not bust as it has no real value

@@Leekodot15 How dare you bring up Euler.

I demand context

@@1unar_eclipse pi = 3.14 As for the context of the idiot instructor, I don't know.

Pi squared is fairly close to ten. But you didn't say that they were squaring pi, so I don't understand why someone would want to round pi to ten.

@@lycanthewerewolf6801some children’s problem I saw once was asking the student to calculate the volume of a cylinder, and it supplied the value for the height, radius… AND Pi, which was 10. My only guess at understanding why is that they had not yet taught the students about the value of pi or the concept of decimal numbers somehow. But even then telling them its value was 3 would have been better.

Let pi equal to 5

Classic Comte L

Can someone be a joke explainer for me

​@@duckmunch8307he gave the game card shark a 3/10 rating when he played it

Card Shark, to be even more explanatory, is halfway between a visual novel and a game with a nonsensical plot. You start as a person who has a surprisingly good sleight of hand and you help the Comte, who is helping some resistance effort by gathering info under the guise of cheating card games. Then, for some reason, you are related to the person you will need to screw over with a rigged card game. All the while, you do nothing but quick timed events to help the Comte cheat at cards. It is very disappointing.

@@iantaakalla8180 It had such a promising premise in terms of both gameplay and story and loses you in the last half with uninteresting gameplay and like 3 or 4 terrible twists too its so sad it had to go that way

My favourite channel to watch people bust and get pegged 💖

@@allie-ontheweb yo wtf

​@@allie-onthewebwe're about to get pegged ourselves

@@RageXBlade someone clearly hasn't watched Peglin 😞

​@@allie-onthewebhe didn't watch paqourette going deep down on the bunhole either

that seems like a bug

@@polocatfan That is intentional actually.

i commented this on 2 of the other videos, he has not listened or does not care :(

@@shadowkilleroid or they were all made prior to your comments and are on an upload schedule as a buffer in case he ever gets ill/has a family emergency/etc.

@@glebglub considering this update absolutely was after he released those videos and before i comented, not likely

3.141592653 seconds. (dont know any further)

​​@@h2kwolfz5723.1415926535897926... i think

I feel great potential coming from this comment

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693937514582097494459 seconds. (I can’t remember any more.)

@@h2kwolfz572 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 58209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679 82148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128 48111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 44288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091 45648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273 72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436 78925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094 33057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548 07446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912 98336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798 60943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132 00056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872 14684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235 42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960 51870721134999999837297804995105973173281609631859 50244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881 71010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303 59825349042875546873115956286388235378759375195778 18577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989 seconds

Exactly pi=e=3 , pi^2=g=10

And if you work with space stuff, 1 is often a good enough estimate for pi.

​@gressorialNanites Assume Pi is 1. "I'm pretty sure it's bigger than that". Okay we can make it 10. Whatever.

significant digits motherfucker, do you speak it.

@@CybeastID yeah but 10 is way too big to represent pi

yes that is exactly what I thought

When I see him bust, I need to bust too, as he said, its natural instinct

@user-zm7jp5qr4r ye

But Tyler meant that it's not the perfect strategy in this version (as opposed to normal blackjack)

The rules of blackjack also say that you only play with the 52 cards in a normal deck of cards (maybe the jokers). When so much of the game has altered, it only makes sense for the opponents to play within the new rules. Changing their stand point would also be useful to make the game more challenging.

@@nightbringar7558 fair point

@@nightbringar7558 yeah it might be nice if they develop some kind of "Smart AI" for certain higher level opponents that plays better into their own decks than "always stand on 17"

​@@nightbringar7558did you watch the video? There was an enemy that stood at 18 instead, tyler even pointed that out

You are correct on both counts. In any given situation, there is a mathematically optimal way to play your hand. If you look up perfect basic strategy for blackjack, you can find the charts easily. The charts have slight differences depending on house rules and number of decks in play, and there can also be deviations depending on what cards have already been dealt (which is one of the reasons why card counting can work to the player's benefit). Also compulsive gamblers are insane and will blame literally anyone but themselves for their losses

i thought that said horny i need to get some fucking sleep

watch it, they might add i (nonreal number) next

@@goober4347 blackjack with 0÷0 next or the square root of -1

Maybe first but party is more inportant