Abdullah's X handle: x.com/Damask_P... Abdullah’s books can be purchased here www.amazon.com... Free PDF of the book: drive.google.c...
Пікірлер: 322
@sandgrouse5779Ай бұрын
We don't like non Muslims explaining Islam but we get only Salafis explaining Shiaism here. Let us have Shias explaining Shiaism or name this channel as Salafi theology.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@sandgrouse5779 Go ahead and name it Salafi Theology pfft 😂 what an impotent threat
@LavenderlavenderfulАй бұрын
thats because shias cant do it they cant explain it they can only show how they are better and the resons for this divide. they cannot explain or reason.
@sandgrouse5779Ай бұрын
Defending Moawwia is not a tennant of Islam or even Sunnism given that Sunnis believe Ali as the rightfuul Caliph but not Moawia, doesn't this say something? This man comes from Nasbi cult.
@louisdeniau8571Ай бұрын
muawiya is greater than most companions
@youssefkandeel3667Ай бұрын
stick to the main point, these people excommunicate Abu bakr and Umar the close companion of the prophet peace be upon him and speak ill of the honor of his wives. this isn't about who was supposed to be caliph Muawiya or Ali.
@karimmezghiche9921Ай бұрын
Sunnis do not consider Muawiya to be a rightful Caliph? That is absolutely false, all Sunni scholars consider Muawiya to have been a rightful Caliph.
@SuicidalSummerSnowWoman26 күн бұрын
@@youssefkandeel3667 exactly... its always the way shias talk about some of the heaven bound companions and Hazrat Aisha RA that sets them apart... the prophet forgave the people of Taif and here come these muslims sullying the names of some of the closest family and friends of our Prophet
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
Great, more on Shia Islam. Although Sunni Islam is more than 85% of Ummah, Shia Islam is the only other normative form of Islam. We Sunnis need to know about it. Great job Paul.
@yussufmwinyi4604Ай бұрын
95% of Muslims do not know about the earliest sect, the Ibadhi
@WaqasAli-ct7lyАй бұрын
Because they are non existent lol@@yussufmwinyi4604
@RamseybazoАй бұрын
There is no such thing as Sunni Islam or Shia Islam, there is only one Islam. Leave these things aside, O servants of Allah, and be brothers. Blasphemy is a single nation...
@hassanmirza2392Ай бұрын
@@yussufmwinyi4604 They are Khawarij, but now peaceful. They are something like a mix of Sunni and Shi'a Islam.
@KnightofPowerАй бұрын
Hilarious
@abdurrazzak2970Ай бұрын
May Allah Bless and Reward Both of you in this Life and in the Hereafter.
@matthewfomby6580Ай бұрын
Pls do not forget to release these on podcast too, for those of us who listen in the car.
@user-hd3jk9cg1iАй бұрын
Ahle Bayt in Islam according to Quran and Hadith_ 1.Wives Prophets (PBUH) 2.Daughters of Prophet (PBUH) 3.Sons of Prophet (PBUH ) 5.Brothers of Prophet (PBUH) 6.Grandsons of Prophet (PBUH) 7.Cousins and nephew of Prophet (PBUH).
@samirhachad643Ай бұрын
Small correction: The Prophet did not have brothers
@X82oo781Ай бұрын
Not possible. If Allah purified the ahlul bayt thoroughly, how can He condemn the wives of the prophet (Aisha and Hafsa) in a later chapter? Allah is not contradictory
@gangstanongrataАй бұрын
Sahih Muslim rejects the wives being from the Ahl al-Bayt: حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكَّارِ بْنِ الرَّيَّانِ، حَدَّثَنَا حَسَّانُ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ - عَنْ سَعِيدٍ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ مَسْرُوقٍ - عَنْ يَزِيدَ بْنِ حَيَّانَ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ أَرْقَمَ، قَالَ دَخَلْنَا عَلَيْهِ فَقُلْنَا لَهُ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتَ خَيْرًا . لَقَدْ صَاحَبْتَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَصَلَّيْتَ خَلْفَهُ . وَسَاقَ الْحَدِيثَ بِنَحْوِ حَدِيثِ أَبِي حَيَّانَ غَيْرَ أَنَّهُ قَالَ " أَلاَ وَإِنِّي تَارِكٌ فِيكُمْ ثَقَلَيْنِ أَحَدُهُمَا كِتَابُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ هُوَ حَبْلُ اللَّهِ مَنِ اتَّبَعَهُ كَانَ عَلَى الْهُدَى وَمَنْ تَرَكَهُ كَانَ عَلَى ضَلاَلَةٍ " . وَفِيهِ فَقُلْنَا مَنْ أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ نِسَاؤُهُ قَالَ لاَ وَايْمُ اللَّهِ إِنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ تَكُونُ مَعَ الرَّجُلِ الْعَصْرَ مِنَ الدَّهْرِ ثُمَّ يُطَلِّقُهَا فَتَرْجِعُ إِلَى أَبِيهَا وَقَوْمِهَا أَهْلُ بَيْتِهِ أَصْلُهُ وَعَصَبَتُهُ الَّذِينَ حُرِمُوا الصَّدَقَةَ بَعْدَهُ . "We went to him (Zaid b. Arqam) and said to him. You have found goodness (for you had the honour) to live in the company of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and offered prayer behind him, and the rest of the hadith is the same but with this variation of wording that lie said: Behold, for I am leaving amongst you two weighty things, one of which is the Book of Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, and that is the rope of Allah. He who holds it fast would be on right guidance and he who abandons it would be in error, and in this (hadith) these words are also found: We said: Who are amongst the members of the household? Aren't the wives (of the Holy Prophet) included amongst the members of his house hold? Thereupon he said: No, by Allah, a woman lives with a man (as his wife) for a certain period; he then divorces her and she goes back to her parents and to her people; the members of his household include his ownself and his kith and kin (who are related to him by blood) and for him the acceptance of Zakat is prohibited." Sahih Muslim 2408d Likewise the relevant verse in the Qur'an is broken into two parts, where the first is addressing the wives and the second is addressing the family, this is determined by the change in gender pronoun.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@user-hd3jk9cg1i yes you are correct and don’t fall for shia and pseudo sunni traps. The verse of Ahlulbayt means both the wives and the relatives of the Prophet PBUH, because the pronouns were used in a plural manner in the purification part. There are hadiths that confirm that the wives are Ahlulbayt as when Ayesha RA was asked about sadaqa. Ibn Battal reported that the wives of the Prophet are not included in this ruling by consensus of the scholars. However, this view is debatable. Ibn Qudamah mentioned that al-Khallal narrated from the route of Ibn Abi Mulaykah from Aisha, who said: "We, the family of Muhammad, are not permitted to receive charity." He commented that this indicates its prohibition. Ibn Hajar said: "Its chain of narration to Aisha is good, and Ibn Abi Shaybah also narrated it." This is mentioned in "Fath al-Bari" (3/356). The hadith of Aisha was narrated by Ibn Abi Shaybah in "al-Musannaf" (7/50), where he said: "Waki' narrated to us from Muhammad ibn Shuraik from Ibn Abi Mulaykah that Khalid ibn Sa'id sent a cow from charity to Aisha, and she returned it, saying: 'We, the family of Muhammad, are not permitted to receive charity.'" Moreover, analogical reasoning supports this view, as explained by Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him: "The correct opinion, as stated explicitly by Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, is that charity is prohibited for them because it consists of the impurities of people. Allah, the Exalted, has preserved this noble household from all impurities of the children of Adam. It is indeed astonishing how the Prophet's wives are included in his saying: 'O Allah, make the sustenance of the family of Muhammad sufficient,' his statement regarding the sacrifice: 'O Allah, this is on behalf of Muhammad and the family of Muhammad,' Aisha's statement: 'The family of the Messenger of Allah never ate their fill of wheat bread,' and the prayer: 'O Allah, send blessings upon Muhammad and the family of Muhammad'-yet they are not included in his saying: 'Charity is not permissible for Muhammad or the family of Muhammad,' considering that it is from the impurities of people. The wives of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, are more deserving of being protected from it and staying away from it." This is from "Jala' al-Afham" (pp. 245-246). And Allah knows best.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@user-hd3jk9cg1i yes you are correct The verse of Ahlulbayt means both the wives and the relatives of the Prophet PBUH, because the pronouns were used in a plural manner in the purification part. There are hadiths that confirm that the wives are Ahlulbayt as when Ayesha RA was asked about sadaqa. Ibn Battal reported that the wives of the Prophet are not included in this ruling by consensus of the scholars. However, this view is debatable. Ibn Qudamah mentioned that al-Khallal narrated from the route of Ibn Abi Mulaykah from Aisha, who said: "We, the family of Muhammad, are not permitted to receive charity." He commented that this indicates its prohibition. Ibn Hajar said: "Its chain of narration to Aisha is good, and Ibn Abi Shaybah also narrated it." This is mentioned in "Fath al-Bari" (3/356). The hadith of Aisha was narrated by Ibn Abi Shaybah in "al-Musannaf" (7/50), where he said: "Waki' narrated to us from Muhammad ibn Shuraik from Ibn Abi Mulaykah that Khalid ibn Sa'id sent a cow from charity to Aisha, and she returned it, saying: 'We, the family of Muhammad, are not permitted to receive charity.'" Moreover, analogical reasoning supports this view, as explained by Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him: "The correct opinion, as stated explicitly by Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, is that charity is prohibited for them because it consists of the impurities of people. Allah, the Exalted, has preserved this noble household from all impurities of the children of Adam. It is indeed astonishing how the Prophet's wives are included in his saying: 'O Allah, make the sustenance of the family of Muhammad sufficient,' his statement regarding the sacrifice: 'O Allah, this is on behalf of Muhammad and the family of Muhammad,' Aisha's statement: 'The family of the Messenger of Allah never ate their fill of wheat bread,' and the prayer: 'O Allah, send blessings upon Muhammad and the family of Muhammad'-yet they are not included in his saying: 'Charity is not permissible for Muhammad or the family of Muhammad,' considering that it is from the impurities of people. The wives of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, are more deserving of being protected from it and staying away from it." This is from "Jala' al-Afham" (pp. 245-246). And Allah knows best.
@ibrahimomar6562Ай бұрын
If Netflix did theology, then brother Paul would be the director. We are immensely grateful for your contributions. May Allah reward you and your contributors. ❤
@alfadlfadah4258Ай бұрын
Very cool topic, what a blessing this channel is
@yazanal-amin3693Ай бұрын
Alhamdullilah, very much needed video.
@mahfuzasamriya8589Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah for Islam
@Samual.adis.NajmaniАй бұрын
Alhamdulillah for truth!
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah for Islam!
@user-ti2kb8ho4zАй бұрын
دعاء عظيم للمجاهدين وأهلنا في فلسطين اللهمّ إنّهم عبادُك وأولياؤك، قد ضاقت بهم المسالك، وأحاطتْ بهمُ المهالك، وأغلِقتْ دونهم المعابر، وتكالبتْ عليهمُ الأمم، واشتدّ بهم الأمر، وازداد الجوع والظلم والقهر والفقر، وعظم عليهم الخطب، واستحكمت حولهم الدوائر* وأدعوك يا الله باسمك الأعظم الذي لذا دعيت به أجبت يا رحمنُ يا رحيم *يا حي يا قيوم يا ذا لجلال والإكرام يا أحد يا صمد يا منان يا بديع السموات والأرض اكشف غُمّتهم، وفرِّج كُربتهم، وأغِثْ لهفتهم، وآمِنهم في أنفسهم وفي أوطانهم، ووسّعْ عليهم من رزقك العظيم، وفضلك العميم، وَجودِك الكريم اللهمّ•• انصرهم وكن معهم وتولَّ أمرهم، واجبر كسرهم، وارحم ضعفهم، وآوِهم، وأطعمهم، واسقِهم، وثبّتْ أقدامهم، وتقبّلْ شهداءهم، وارحمْ موتاهم، واسترْ عوراتهم ونساءهم، واحفظ شيوخهم وشبابهم* وارحمْ صغارهم وأطفالهم، وانصرهم على مَن عاداهم وظلمَهم وآذاهم* يا ربَّ العالمين اﻟﻠﻬﻢّ اجعلْ لهم من أمرهم وكَربهم ومحنتهم وشدّتهم وضيقهم فرَجاً ومخرجاً، وملجأً ومتنفّساً، وصحةً وسلامةً وعافية اللهم احفظهم من بين أيديهم ومن خلفهم، وعن أيْمانهم وعن شمائلهم، ومن فوقهم ومن تحت أرجُلهم، واجعلهم في حفظك وحرزك، وفي عونك وعنايتك، وفي كنَفِك ورعايتك، وفي عفوك وعافيتك، وفي كرمك وحبل جوارك* واحرسهم بعينك التي لا تغفلُ ولا تنام اللهم انصر المجاهدين في سبيلك اللهم سدد رأيهم ورميهم اللهم ثبت أقدامهم وانصرهم على القوم الكافرين الظالمين المجرمين المتوحشين اللهم اجعل رميهم ناراً ووبالاً على أعدائهم اللهم زلزل الأرض من تحتهم وأنزل عليهم النيران من فوقهم اللهم أحصهم عدداً وشتتهم بدداً ولا تغادر منهم أحداً هم وكل من ساندهم اللهم إنهم استكبروا وعلو علواً كبيراً اللهم أذلهم واسقهم كأس الصغار وتبر ما على تتبيراً اللهم تقبل شهداءنا الأبرار عندك في عليين من النبيين والصديقين اللهم أنهم بالشفاء العاجل لكل مصاب واجعل جراحه كفارات ورفع درجات الله عوِض ممتلكات من خسر شيئاً تعويضاً عظيماً في الدنيا والآخرة اللهم عليك بالخونة المجرمين داخل فلسطين وخارجها فهم أشد على أمتنا من أعدائها اللهم إنهم أنذال فأذلهم وخلص الأمة منهم ومن نجاستهم الله وبارك في كل من شارك في هذا الجهاد من القادة العسكريين والسياسيين والمساندين للمجاهدين بكافة أنواعهم والطواقم الطبية والدفاع المدني والإطفاء والإغاثة وكافة أنواع الصمود والجهاد اللهم وارزقهم جميعاً أجر الجهاد وعاملهم كالشهداء فقد نوى كل واحد منهم الشهادة في سبيلك اللهم واشهد أننا نتمنى لو كنا معهم لكن المجرمين حجزوا بيننا وبينهم، وقد نوينا الشهادة بصدق فاكتب لنا الشهادة ولو متنا على فرشنا اللهم وأعنا لنقوم بواجبنا تجاه المجاهدين وتجاه المظلومين واغفر اللهم لنا تقصيرنا تجاههم❤ ❤❤❤ اللهم آمين❤❤❤ وﺻﻞِّ اﻟﻠﻬﻢّ وﺳﻠّﻢْ وبارك❤❤
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
It’s like asking a Zionist to explain the rights of Palestinians. This is so absurd
@Sufia_Rafidah_BusterАй бұрын
Brother Abdullah always explains so well in detail. May Allah reward him. May Allah also reward you for inviting him on your channel to share his thoughts.
@majorpremiseАй бұрын
If Paul Williams is truly fair-minded and balanced he should allow a Shi'i rebuttal to this Wahhabi propaganda. The Shi'a are busy doing real work in MENA and defending Palestine and Takfiris/Salafis/Wahhabis/Sunnis are busy with foolishness and siding with Tel Aviv.
@AshrafAnamАй бұрын
As a Sunni, I agree with you. This video is insightful...I was always interested in knowing about the Zaydi history of Yemen but was bit disappointed when he started speaking ill about our Ansaar Allaah/Houthi lions.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@majorpremise It is funny how you use sectarian code words of Shias aimed at Sunnis while first word you say is “takfiri”. Your whole books and scholars takfir Sunnis in secret and in public they hide it. There is a reason why you preach your ideas in secret. Regardless, have fun with your slandering.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@AshrafAnam 4ـ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْحُسَيْنِ عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ أَبِي نَصْرٍ عَنْ دَاوُدَ بْنِ سِرْحَانَ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ الله (عَلَيهِ السَّلام) قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ الله (صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وآلِه) إِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ أَهْلَ الرَّيْبِ وَالْبِدَعِ مِنْ بَعْدِي فَأَظْهِرُوا الْبَرَاءَةَ مِنْهُمْ وَأَكْثِرُوا مِنْ سَبِّهِمْ وَالْقَوْلَ فِيهِمْ وَالْوَقِيعَةَ وَبَاهِتُوهُمْ كَيْلا يَطْمَعُوا فِي الْفَسَادِ فِي الإسْلامِ وَيَحْذَرَهُمُ النَّاسُ وَلا يَتَعَلَّمُوا مِنْ بِدَعِهِمْ يَكْتُبِ الله لَكُمْ بِذَلِكَ الْحَسَنَاتِ وَيَرْفَعْ لَكُمْ بِهِ الدَّرَجَاتِ فِي الآخِرَةِ. 4. Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Muhammad ibn al-Husayn from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn abu Nasr from Dawud ibn Sarhan from Abu ‘Abdillah (a.s.) who said: “The Messenger of Allah (sw) said, ‘When you find the people of doubt and innovation after me, show your dissassociation from them and increase your insults against them, speaking against them, and exposing them, so that they do not corrupt Islam, and (so that) people be warned against them and avoid learning their innovations. Allah will record good deeds for you because of that and elevate your ranks in the Hereafter.’” Al-Kāfi - Volume 2, Association with Sinful People, Hadith #4 These are Sunnis to them, mate.
@karimb972Ай бұрын
Any Sunni that disagrees with the Shia are wahabis. Got it. Paul Williams is a Sunni therefore he is not fair minded. Makes sense... Alhamdoullilah for Islam where the majority of adherents are on the truth and it's only a minority that is misguided.
@karimb972Ай бұрын
The idea that Sunni country majority governments are siding and helping Israel is ignorance and Zionist propaganda straight out of Israeli newspapers. Ikhwani publications like Middle East Eye and Shia and Zionists are the most enthusiastic about propagating those lies.
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
My dearest brother Paul would urge you to contact a credible scholar such as Syed Ali Hur kamonpoori to explain the the jafri school of thought or Shia sect and its analysis with Zaidi and Ahle Sunnah. He has a channel Al Islaah strongly recommend to get a sincere insight into these schools of thought
@tigerspirit4771Ай бұрын
That would be brilliant.
@omer1340Ай бұрын
lol kamonpoori is not a good person to go to for Shia Islam
@karimmezghiche9921Ай бұрын
@@omer1340why? What did he do?
@omer1340Ай бұрын
@@karimmezghiche9921 he's a big time reformist
@adam.bashirАй бұрын
Yemen has always been Shāfi’i - a tradition still very well preserved for centuries in the south & parts of the north like Taiz, Ibb & the Tihama in general by well established prominent sunni scholarly households like the Ba’alawis [آل باعلوي] in Hadramout or the Ahādilah [الأهادلة] in Al Hudaydah etc. There is also a large percentage of Zaydis; historically & currently part of the theological fabric of Yemen, almost exclusively in the north. In recent years, foreign actors have made attempts to encroach on this theological fabric for whatever geopolitical or economic motives, such as the Saudi-exported push of Wahābi Najdi influence among the Sunni populations beginning in the 80’s, 90’s and early 2000’s, or an Iranian-exported push of Rafidi Majūsi influence among the Zaydi populations. Both are foreign to Yemen, aim to exacerbate differences, and must be outright rejected.
@at.tamiimiАй бұрын
Spot on, brother! Couldn’t have said it better myself… In the words of Dr. Abdallah Az-Zouba'i Ash-Shammari: الشافعية في اليمن سيدفعون الثمن غاليًا نتيجة تهاونهم في تقوية مذهبهم الشافعي أمام المد الوهابي الخارجي المبتدع، فجنوب اليمن معقل الشافعية أصبح تحت سيطرة الوهابية الخوارج بشقيهم الداعشي والجامي. اتعظوا يا شافعية الجنوب مما حدث لأبناء مذهبكم في عسير والحجاز الذين خدعتهم الوهابية. "The Shafi'is in Yemen will pay a heavy price as a result of their negligence in strengthening their Shafi'i doctrine in the face of the deviant foreign Wahhabi tide. South Yemen, the stronghold of the Shafi'is, has become under the control of the Wahhabi Kharijites, with their IS*S and Jaami brethren. Take heed, O Shafi'is of the South, from what happened to the sons of your madhab in 'Asir and Hijaz (in Saudi Arabia), who were deceptively infiltrated by Wahhabism." But praise be to Allah, for the prominent Sunni Yemeni households you have mentioned, along with many others, who have stepped up to the task and through them, Shafi’ism continues to thrive in Yemen, against exported Wahabism & Twelver Shiism, just as these same households once lead their people in firm resistance against Imperialism and Communism in the past.
@ahmad.imran.isa.Ай бұрын
I love Ahl al Bait immensely and i really love your works on them. And i would like to buy your books if i can. I'm from Malaysia
@alib7489Ай бұрын
Please invest in some new skins audio systems. BT is too important a platform for laptop loud speaker technology audio. Jazakallah Khair
@darkrogue98Ай бұрын
This whole idea of a school being prone to a wide spectrum of political extremes is very insightful!
@MohaGhazi-tq1lfАй бұрын
Brother Paul, why don't you hear about Shiism from the Shia themselves? For example hearing about Islam from Christians will not be useful, and they will give you a bad idea about Islam, and you will not know the truth unless you engage in dialogue with the Muslims themselves I think you should ask shia themselves
@BloggingTheologyАй бұрын
I have done an interview on this channel with a Shia scholar about Shiism: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mL2AgrOCqdDDeYk.htmlsi=83HCqqfY_glHzY-m
@MohaGhazi-tq1lfАй бұрын
@@BloggingTheology Thank you brother Paul i would recomand also an interview with the shia scholar Cheykh Azhar Nasser
@Mym794Ай бұрын
We are not interested in Shia nonsense.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
In my opinion we should learn at least what they think about us and what they want to do to and about us Muslims to avoid their tricks and fitan.
@user-in5vn1jp2qАй бұрын
@@Mym794 we aren’t interested in your nonsense. Nasibis like you do kufr every time you speak.
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
To learn about Shia get a Shia scholar not a scholar who opposes the sect vehemently being inaccurate and biased
@truthserum44Ай бұрын
That’s right, he didn’t rebuke the Rafidi deviants enough
@SoundSignals18 күн бұрын
Well said
@user-kj8yl6sn2zАй бұрын
There is a master's thesis entitled Badr al-Din al-Houthi and his critical views, a presentation and criticism by Sheikh Rajeh bin Sultan al-Buqami. I believe the thesis at Umm Al-Qura University, and the thesis was before the Yemen war, so it was important in understanding the Houthi thought and his religious approach.
@Elevli-ZeydiАй бұрын
The Mutamad in the Zaydi Madhab is that it is preferable to follow a living mujtahid rather than a dead one. On what happened to some Scholars of the Zaydiyya is that some of them, after becoming mujtahids, diverged closer to Ahl al Sunnah but that doesnt mean that all of them, who became closer to Sunnis, actually saw themselves as Sunnis, Zaydism in its essence is a Firqah, an Group based on certain principles of Usul al-Din, as long as someone adheres to those principles he is called Zaydi even when he diverges in Fiqh or on smaller matters of itiqad. Thats why there are some Zaydis who are more positive or less positive on the matter of the righteousness of the Sahabah. In Fiqh as an example there where in the past more than one Zaydi Madhab, Qasimiyya, Nasiriyya and Hadawiyya (the remaining one). On the Matter of Yemeni Politics, the Zaydis are a political Sect, for them the Matter of Imamah is Central, thats why they dont back down on these matters. The Ahl al Sunnah in Yemen is more democratic and thats why sunni yemenis complain about Zaydis, cause they dont want to live under Zaydi rule. And Huthis arent Rafidha, they are called like this because their political enemies of ahl al sunnah need a good argument to urge the people to fight them. The Zaydis past and present dont insult the Sahabah except the fact that they hate Muawiya and his followers for their crimes against the Ummah and the righteous Khalif/Imam Ali -alayhi salam-. It this makes them Rafidha, than most of the Ahl al Bayt in the History of Islam and all of the Zaydis are rafidha and that is not restricted to the Huthis. P.S: What Abdullah al-Rabbat is explaining is a subjectively sunni view dont expect objectivity.
@AshrafAnamАй бұрын
Interesting! As a Sunni, I condemn Mu'aawiya and all the Umayyad rulers until the predecessor of Sayyidunaa 'Umar ibn 'Abdu-lAziiz too. I would totally prefer to live under a Zaydi Imamate than a Sunni majority secular democracy. I wish Zaydis and us Sunnis could pray together in the same mosque. It's utterly shameful that we have to have separate places of worship as Muslims.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@AshrafAnam Bro 💀 you don’t understand why they condemn Muawiya. The reason they separate mosques is because they don’t like using the washrooms of Sunnis (Nawasib) nor pray behind them and find whoever crosses hands/arms in prayer a kafir 😭 But regardless you do you.
@Elevli-ZeydiАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445 Fear Allah brother, dont spread misinformation do not forget that we will be judged for our words by our Rabb -jalla jalaluhu. First of all, Muawiya is condemned because as a Sahabi and a first hand witness he should do better than start a war between brothers and harm the ummah, especially for worldy reasons. They seperate mosques the same way the other muslims do, in fiqh there are certain matters where there is ikhtilaf and sometimes there is a dispute if you can pray behind someone but that doesnt mean that takfir is made. Its the same with the Ahl al Sunnah, it is not preferred to pray behind a Fasiq or someone who´s wudu could be invalid. The Ahl al-Sunnah in general have similar opinions to the Zaydis. A normal sunni is not called nasibi only the ones where we perceive animosity to Ahl al-Bayt, and believe it or not, such people exist, thats why Husayn -alayhi salam was killed. A true zaydi would never do takfir on fiqhi matters, we dont call people non believers for praying differently. Zaydis try to avoid takfir, we even have a definition called fasiq al-tawil.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@Elevli-Zeydi Yes Zaydis are different than all the subsects of Shias but all that I said are in your books in verbatim. Even Ali RA didn’t say Muawiyah fought for worldly reasons. Books are like Islamic Government by Khomeini and Nahjul Balagha and all the other Sahih books considered by Shias, Twelver or not. Good thing that Zaydis don’t takfir regardless.
@Elevli-ZeydiАй бұрын
@@AshrafAnam Thank you for your words brother. In the past when there was a zaydi imamate in yemen, zaydis and sunnis lived together without much problems. Thats why there where many many great sunni scholars under zaydi rulership. If they complained it was most of the time because they didnt want to live under a, from a sunni point of view, innovater-rulership. The problems which existed were similar to problems in other muslim lands. And they still pray together. Its not like the zaydis in yemen will throw you out of the mosque. Or that the shafiis will throw out a zaydi. Only if you start to make political statements, than you will not be welcomed by either side.
@contemplativelyАй бұрын
Valuable talk. I learned a lot.
@user-ti2kb8ho4zАй бұрын
Yes, my dear brothers, my beloved Palestine is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it contains Al-Aqsa, the third holiest place for us Muslims in Palestine. Bethlehem, the cradle of Christ, is a blessed land, and it is the holy land, and it has been our land for tens of thousands of years, and it is the land of the Canaanite Arabs, the original Palestinian people, and they have lived in it since the Islamic conquest in the era. The Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman Arabs, Muslims, Christians and Jews are like brothers and neighbors under Palestinian rule to the owners of the land, but the Zionists came and the British occupation brought them to our land as compensation to the Jews for what they did to them Hitler. The question here is that who did the Holocaust, the Germans, why do I, the Palestinian Arab, pay the price? Why not Germany? Why do I, the Muslim, pay the price for crimes? Committed by the Germans and Nazi Europe, fascism is the root of all evil in the world. Our problem is the occupation❤Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me. القدس عاصمة فلسطين الابدية ❤
@ahmad.imran.isa.Ай бұрын
Really want to learn more on Zaidism & al Syaukani
@Wakobear.Ай бұрын
Could you make a video on the Caspian Zaydis. And the similarities and differences in their theology compared to the Yemeni Zaydis
@AshrafAnamАй бұрын
There are Maghrebi Zaydis as well
@sunshineseaandvitamind8620Ай бұрын
And North African Ibadis too.
@grinningchickenАй бұрын
I like this channel but other than it occasionally just lets someone go on Shiaphobic rants without letting Shia speak for themselves which creates divisions and misrepresentations of the truth
@AshrafAnamАй бұрын
As a Sunni, I agree with you. This video is insightful...I was always interested in knowing about the Zaydi history of Yemen but was bit disappointed when he started speaking ill about our Ansaar Allaah/Houthi lions.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@grinningchicken Shiasm itself is Sunniphobic 😂
@karimb972Ай бұрын
Chicken man : if you disagree with Shi'ism you are shiaphobic. What's next : disagreeing with Qadianis is qadiaphobic? This channel is about the truth as followed by the majority of Muslims. This is a channel owned by a Sunni. If you don't like it, leave and watch your shia websites.
@Sufia_Rafidah_BusterАй бұрын
Who was ranting? Did you actually watch the video?
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@Sufia_Rafidah_Buster your name is epic 😭
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
Brother Paul this is inaccurate or intentional dishonest. Kindly contact a learned Shia Usooli Scholar this brother appears to be extremely biased
@shabs6214Ай бұрын
Thanks
@damurichannel11 күн бұрын
You cant invite a non Shia Muslim to explaim Shia Islam, stop with this! Its like christians explaning sunni islam and labelling them ad !S!S
@majesticsoysauce8648Ай бұрын
Why is hadramawt shown as Shia there? It is Sunni shafaee
@masih9595Ай бұрын
Same for south yemen
@thbfgАй бұрын
We need more talk on unity, more focus on what unites not what divides
@karimb972Ай бұрын
Praying with Sadl is not shia but Maliki.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@karimb972 Imam Malik said it was Makrooh in his books and he couldn’t lift his arms and cross his hands due to the ruler of the time who kept torturing him for his actions. It is Shia actually. And generally takfir who crosses his hands during prayer.
@karimb972Ай бұрын
I will keep onl following the consensus of Maliki ulama before following you. Imam Maliki Rahimu Allah was tortured by Shia political authorities? Any source for that? You're making things up and making false accusations against our blessed Imam? La Hawla wa Quwatta ila Billah
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@karimb972 I…am actually not and I am surprised you don’t know he was tortured around the time of Abu Jafar Al Mansur. You can look up these sources if you would like. Regarding the crossing of arms it is in his Muwata as I mentioned: On Placing One Hand Over the Other in Prayer **Hadith 424:** - Narrated by Abu Mus'ab: Malik narrated from Abdul Karim ibn Abi Mukharraq al-Basri that he said: From the words of Prophethood are: "If you feel no shame, then do as you wish," and placing one hand over the other in prayer. **Hadith 425:** - Narrated by Abu Mus'ab: Malik narrated that one places the right hand over the left, and the hastening of breaking the fast and the delay in Suhoor. **Volume 1, Page 164** 1. **Ibn Abdul Barr:** - Ibn Nafi', Abdul Malik, and Mutarrif narrated from Malik that he said: "The right hand is placed over the left in prayer, whether obligatory or voluntary." He said there is no harm in this. - Abu 'Umar ibn Abdul Barr commented: This is the opinion of the scholars of Madinah among his followers (al-Istidhkar 2/291). 2. **Ashhab:** - Ashhab said: I asked Malik about a man placing one of his hands over the other in obligatory prayer. He said: "I see no harm in it, whether in obligatory or voluntary prayer" (al-Bayan wa al-Tahsil 1/394). 3. **Ibn Abdul Barr:** - Ibn Abdul Barr said: Malik stated: "There is no harm in it in both obligatory and voluntary prayers, and this is the narration of the scholars of Madinah from him" (al-Tamheed 20/75).
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@karimb972 Well…my comment got deleted. But it is true regardless, you can do your own research on it as I can’t show it here
@wrs1627Ай бұрын
@@quranpl8445liar and ignorant. Re read your Shahada
@RamseybazoАй бұрын
There is no such thing as Sunni Islam or Shia Islam, there is only one Islam. Leave these things aside, O servants of Allah, and be brothers. Blasphemy is a single nation...
@Mym794Ай бұрын
This is fantasty. In reality, there's Shia and Sunnah and ignoring the reality will not change it.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@Ramseybazo What I am on and my companions and nothing more yes!
@badalrana10Ай бұрын
Yeah you're ignorant akhi These are labels that signal to belief What do you believe, do you believe in following the sahaba? Congratulations you're sunni
@boygenius538_8Ай бұрын
You are ignorant
@user-hd3jk9cg1iАй бұрын
Follow Quran and Prophets and then his Sahabas ,its enough. O Muslim dont be divided . @@badalrana10
@seamus4055Ай бұрын
Insightful episode
@JahCureAgainАй бұрын
This is going to be a goooooood video🙌🏼
@ramyhasabo2Ай бұрын
شكرا جزيلا
@adnankassem8114Ай бұрын
MashaAllah this was excellent may Allah reward the two of you. The connection between the students of Al Shawkani and the Salafis of the subcontinent is amazing. Also the comment about the spectrum and people coming closer to the truth,many times the students of such scholars end up whole heatedly embracing the truth. So despite all odds, there is much fruit from their leaning towards truth.
@Mym794Ай бұрын
As a Yemeni, Imamah was the worst thing happened in our history. Their times were full of ignorance, sickness and oppression.
@nasserm.nasser5087Ай бұрын
Islam is a religion of fitra, but the shias have added to many bidaa such as self flagellation, mud bathing, fire walking etc. I am uncomfortable with their taqiya and muta doctrines. They are imam centric while sunni is Allah centric. Plus, their hatred for sahaba is just crazy. We don't even hate the people who changed the religion of Jesus PBUH by adding trinity. It doesn't make sense at all
@La_Fata_Ila_AliАй бұрын
I will tell you this much, being a Shia myself, Beating of oneself, fire walking and such is entirely false. Only the very extreme do this and we distance ourselves from them. Second, Taqiyaa for us is the same for you, we can lie to save our own lives or the lives of others, only the very extreme use it to a sinful level and call it halal, Third, Muta is a tricky topic, however, it’s very very limited. We are allowed it for purposes that can benefit the two parties, but strictly for sexual purposes is completely haram. Last, the hatred of some Sahaba is entirely based on person to person. The only “Sahaba” we truly hate with all out hearts are Muawia and Yazid (La), they truly attacked the prophet and the family of the Prophet (pbut) and they had no remorse for it. I hope you understand now, most things you hear about Shias are all just the extremists, like the belief that all Muslims are terror!std because of a few extremists.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@nasserm.nasser5087 shias have different Quran different tafsir different hadith different history and different everything. And each subsect of Shias takfir each other except for Zaydis. If you say such things they do they will deny it as an act of taqiya as our Shia friend above mentioned according to their marjaas they have to lie to “save” themselves. And they mostly don’t read their books but rather imitate their marjaas which is why it is called marjaa al taqleed. And of course most of their accusations are based on what they heard from their Muamim (Shia scholar who wears a turban)
@user-in5vn1jp2qАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445If you can show me a physical copy of a different Shia Quran, may Allah curse me to hell. If you can’t, then may Allah curse you to hell.
@La_Fata_Ila_AliАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445 you’re worse than the reporters who tell stories of Israel. You regurgitate what you hear on the news and lie through your teeth. Oh wait, just like all of your countries support Israel as well. Let’s see the countries currently HELPING Palestine shall we? Lebanon: Shia Syria: Shia Iraq: Shia Iran: Shia + The Houthis of Yemen: Shia Now let’s see who still makes deals with Israel Saudi Arabia: Sunni The Entire UAE: Sunni
@user-in5vn1jp2qАй бұрын
Why do Sunnis’s always invite Sunnis to talk about Shias?? Try inviting a Shia like Ammar Nakshawani to understand the true view of Shia Islam without all the bias and additional false information that is typically propagated.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@user-in5vn1jp2q All Shias deny other Shias ideas and say “we are true Shias” Which Shias are you talking about? 😂
@112seyedАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445exactly, you need to understand that there are Shia subsects , hence don't beat every Shia with the same stick
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@112seyed then our OP should say it isn’t false information!
@user-in5vn1jp2qАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445 you mean the way Deobandi, Salafi’s, hanafi’s, Maliki etc do to each other? I’m speaking about the twelever Shias who are the majority and follow the Quran and the Ahlulbait (as) as commanded to us by the Holy Prophet (saw) at Ghadir Khumm.
Hope Paul will keep this great channel open to different schools of thoughts and opinions, and not let it be hijacked by Wahhabism.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@NejiBHTahar Wahhabism doesn’t exist. Try again
@karimb972Ай бұрын
Wahabism according to Shias : anyone disagreeing with Shi'ism
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@karimb972 No joke I have had Christian and atheist friends who were called Wahhabis. The word is so fluid now 😂
@NejiBHTaharАй бұрын
@@quranpl8445 Most likely you are one of them as your reaction reflects. And if yes, that is your business. Hope you understand you are not Paul to who the comment was sent. But, who knows, maybe he does not also exist according to your previous statement.
@NejiBHTaharАй бұрын
@@karimb972not necessary as Shiism exist way before Wahhabism. However, what you said makes more sense nowadays because of the continuous political disagreement between Iran & Saudi Arabia since the Iranian revolution. Hope that will end soon to help the whole region focus on what matters and benefits their people.
@sm98710Ай бұрын
Your mic sounds choppy, kinda distracting
@Iboy_NisaАй бұрын
There was no shia in prophet Muhammad era, their holy 12 imams are similar teaching as 12 disciples in christianity
@damurichannel11 күн бұрын
Your 4 Imams were taught by those "12 disciples". It's bold to assume that the students Islam can survive but the Islam of the teacher who taught them is lost.
@ashfaquei.k.426Ай бұрын
Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ “O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
@ashfaquei.k.426Ай бұрын
It is sunnah to recite {Subhaanal-Malikil-Quddus} 3 times after the Witr prayer, while elongating the words in the third time. سُبْحَانَ الْمَلِكِ الْقُدُّوسِ Subhaanal-Malikil-Quddus, Subhaanal-Malikil-Quddus, Subhaanal-Malikil-Qudduuuuuuuus (or Subhaaaaanal-Malikil-Quddus). Sunan an-Nasa’i 1729
@tatheersyed3953Ай бұрын
Please involve authentic Shia scholar to answer these contentious issues because brother Abdullah Al Rabat commentary and arguments are biased..
@AshrafAnamАй бұрын
true
@saifklee178Ай бұрын
The hardcore sunni followers of this channel would revolt. Its huge risk for BT.
@karimb972Ай бұрын
So Sunnis don't have the right to have an opinion on Shi'ism. Makes complete sense. Do you always bring Sunnis to refute Shi'ites in your shia videos?
@karimb972Ай бұрын
@@saifklee178we are all sunnis. Why do you need to add "hardcore"? What does that mean? A believing Sunni? Produce high quality content on your shia website instead of coming here and cry about Sunnis not being Shias
@karimb972Ай бұрын
Being a Shia is biased if we follow your logic. Cope better : BT is Sunni. If you don't like it open your YT shia Channel
@user-hd3jk9cg1iАй бұрын
Shia is cult devieted sect ,any Muslim who knows about Tawhid if read Shia Books he will clearly understand that Shia sect is devieted. May Allah guide all of us to true Islam, Aameen.
@user-qi4up7uy9iАй бұрын
The term "stan" is of Persian origin and means "place" or "earth". This suffix is commonly used in Persian and other related languages such as Pashto, Urdu and Turkish, which have been influenced by Persian. Historically, these regions were part of or were influenced by the Persian Empire or the later Islamic Caliphate, which spread the Persian language and culture. The use of "stan" in place names indicates a geographical or ethnic designation, such as "Afghanistan" meaning "land of the Afghans" and "Uzbekistan" meaning the land of the Uzbeks. This nomenclature reflects the historical linguistic and cultural ties of these regions. For example, the name of Pakistan also uses the same suffix does, which means the land of the pure. That's it Like the names of countries like Turkmenistan and Tajikistan Refer to the land of their respective nationalities. This suffix not only indicates geographical identity but also Also describes the cultural and historical heritage of the regions. Therefore, the use of "Sta
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
I’ve been watching blogging theology and have been impressed with their production of interesting discussions with credible intellectuals. I was extremely shocked watching the above video which is clearly designed to fuel sectarianism. The brother is provided incredible and is being inaccurate or intentionally dishonest when describing Zaidi school of thought or the jafri relying on akhbari resources as opposed to the most credible usooli resources and scholars who are the authority on Shia philosophy. I strongly suggest that the organisers of such discussions should contact credible learned Shia Scholars to describe their perspectives. I would recommend speaking to an usooli scholar such as Syed Ali Hurr Kamanpoori who in my humble opinion is most qualified and would give you a fairer analysis of Shia Twelvers and Zaidi. Would be beneficial for objective enquirers
@Shofixti616323 күн бұрын
Bassam Zawadi, the anti-Ash'ari wahhabi troll, doing videos on blogging theology? Disappointed in Brother Paul. And this Shawkani was ra'is al-mubtadiyyin in his area.
@AliA-im7xxАй бұрын
get let's talk religion on here.
@SayedMMoosavi28 күн бұрын
Why are you having non-Shi’as Muslims explaining Shi’a Islam? The fact that this person keeps using the term Rafidhi shows his extremist takfiri leanings. Is this the type of Islam Paul is learning? Bring a learned Ahi’a scholar to explain Shi’a history, theology, and jurisprudence. Very disappointing.
@mrsteam5515Ай бұрын
Sunni, Zaydi shia does it matter? Zaydis are the closest to Sunnis. As a Sunni I am against sectarianism from any sides.
@ElderKarchaАй бұрын
According to a famous narration, the holy Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said that his Ummah would split into 73 factions. But what he was really talking about? the best answer is that the 1st split-up disqualified the Saqifah faction which has forsaken the divinely appointed Mawla Ali at the farewell of Ghadir Khum. The next 71 split-ups occurred among the Shia of Mawla Ali and disqualified 71 factions one by one in the midst of trials. Finally, we are left with the only qualified faction, the Shia-led Axis, which has remained faithful to the path of the holy Prophet Muhammad ﷺ and his twelve rightful successors.
@azizsafudinАй бұрын
Where is the theology of the twelvers from? None of that came from the Prophet ﷺ
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@azizsafudin it isn’t in Quran nor what Zaydis even follow 💀 and even still, the hadith or sermon of Ghadir Khum doesn’t even stay explicitly that Ali RA is the first leader
@ElderKarchaАй бұрын
The theology of the Twelvers is derived from the Quran and the teachings of the holy Prophet Muhammad, primarily transmitted by his rightful twelve successors from Quraish and precisely from his pure family. As for the Arabic word “Mawla”, everyone in the past used it to address caliphs, sultans, kings, and princes. The expression “Mawlaya al Malik/Khalifa” is very common in the Arabic culture. But when it comes to Mawla Ali in your understanding, it means “Habibi” only. Even in the holy Quran, the word “Mawla” implies authority and guardianship.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@ElderKarcha Nothing about Imamate in Quran nor Hadiths it is only from subtlety you have derived it even your scholars say so. “Nas al khafi”
@azizsafudinАй бұрын
@@ElderKarcha look, I personally believe that the ones from the ahl bayt should have continued leading the khilafah after the rashiduun, but to claim that it is their divine right is simply an innovation that our Prophet ﷺ himself never endorsed. We do not add things to our religion.
@ElderKarchaАй бұрын
1:07:45 It won’t be a true “Renaissance” unless it admits the divine appointment of Mawla Ali at the farewell of Ghadir Khum 😂
@hymnisphearАй бұрын
Beware Shawkaniyy was not a scholar of Ahl us Sunnah wal Jama'ah. He innovated the invalid belief that has spread that if a person utters kufr without being compelled by the threat of death, citing it, by the slip of the tongue, or a misinterpretation that is not against the fundamentals of the creed, if he does not accept it in his heart then this individual is not deemed a kafir. Hence by his invalid fatwa if a person cursed Allah and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم and this individual was not forced to do so one would have to ask him how he felt about the kufr he uttered before one can deem him as a kafir. This is a door 🚪 to kufr. He is not a scholar, scholars protect people from kufr they don't open the door to it.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
Thanks for the info
@shaunshaikh8617Ай бұрын
You're not a scholar. So stop insulting people 100 times better than you.
@Dr_Mike_USАй бұрын
Please try to understand SHI'SM is not ISLAM. Don't use the word SHIA ISLAM. Shia cult was launched by a Jewish person guised in the clothes of Muslim by the name of Abdullah Bin Saba from Yemen in the period of 3rd Caliph Hazrat Usman and was finally burned by Hazrat Ali RA in his caliphate. Islam is one which people call SUNNI ISLAM taken from Ahlay Sunna Wal Jamma. NOTE: I haven't watched the video but I'm making it clear for everyone that because of these Cults the true picture of ISLAM is not been displayed in front of the Wetsten World and it is distorting the true picture of Islam. SHI'ISM is a branch of Judaism.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@Dr_Mike_US he ran away he wasn’t burned but he burned his followers
@tigerspirit4771Ай бұрын
Salaams, blogging theory I would recommend and for anyone else checking out ammar nakshawani and especially his new series on Muharram, it covers some brilliant lectures that will explain in more depth. Also books to read which are excellent are from Muhammad Tijani's, then I was guided, ask those who know, he has a few. It changes ones heart and mind with sincere truth seeking.
@RiseandShine-ye2vxАй бұрын
❤
@BearTraderDanАй бұрын
Who are you to call the Houthis heretics. You must see the brave men of Ansarallah as bad to hide the fact that the Sunni nations. Failed to fight for Palestine while the Houthis and Shia perform jihad . The Sunni nations help Israel break the blockade and you talk about extremism from Houthis … You also briefly mentioned Ibin fitna aka ibin Taymiyah which explains why you’re so sectarian .
@abuAbdul-MumeetАй бұрын
Around 38:33 the brother says the ahl us-sunnah belief is that if somebody dies unrepentant they will be eventually forgiven. But this is not true at all, as this is the position of the murji`ah and not the ahl us-sunnah. The position of the ahl us-sunnah is that it depends on whether the sins unrepented for are minor sins or major sins. If they are the minor sins unrepented for this can get very technical (and I am sorry but I simply do not have the energy to type such a large amount of text only for it most likely not to be read anyway) and if they are major sins such as al-kufr, shirk billah, alcohol, zina, murder and they are unrepented for then the position of the ahl us-sunnah is this will result in hell forever. The position of the khawaarij is that minor sins are a cause of unbelief and major sins will be a cause of hell forever whether repented for or not. It is important to get these things correct in-shaa' Allah...
@Abdullah-nk3ifАй бұрын
This is incorrect. You do not understand the Sunni position. The Sunnis believe unrepentant major sinners will eventually be admitted into Heaven.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
I think he meant that eventually sins of any kind will be forgiven except for shirk per Quran as all Muslims, even those who are admitted into hell to expiate their sins, will enter heaven
@abuAbdul-MumeetАй бұрын
Al-manzil bayn al-manzilatayn is the mu`tazili belief in major sinners being in neither hell nor paradise but in a place in between! It is a kufr thing to hold to..
@abuAbdul-MumeetАй бұрын
For the position of the ahl us-sunnah regarding sins and tawbah, read all the narrations with their explanations in Jaami` al-`uloom wal-hikm by ibn Rajab al-Hanbali in the section called "The book of taqwah". You will soon find the proof for the fact Allah does not accept the obligatory prayers and fasts of one who has outstanding tawbah and not having your prayers and fasts accepted is a very major thing to be concerned about as it is tantamount to not praying at all.
@justice70567Ай бұрын
@@abuAbdul-Mumeet "Being neither in hell nor in paradise"? Where did you get this from, this is not a Mutazili belief. They say a major sinner who doesnt repent is not a believer and not necessary a disbeliever but a fasiq who occupies a position between the 2 positions, and if died without repenting he will stay in hell forever, they dont say he is neither in hell nor in heaven lol.
@Samual.adis.NajmaniАй бұрын
Believe me when i say this type of sectarianism is unislamic according to the very Quran. We should not be decided.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
Islam is one there are no sects in Islam in Quran and Hadith. Only one sect is saved out of 73.
@karimb972Ай бұрын
That is a very ignorant comment. You need to take a position. You are either with the majority or a minority. You can force two contradicting positions to reconcile. Either you believe the sahaba of the prophet were evil or you believe they were saints. Either you believe there are 12 imams with perfect knowledge or you believe it's pure fantasy and science fiction.
@Samual.adis.NajmaniАй бұрын
@@karimb972 I'm shafi'i sunni Muslim. I know my stand. I mean between us, not Shia
@sunshineseaandvitamind8620Ай бұрын
Yes I agree Brother Paul should steer clear of sectarianism. ❤
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@Samual.adis.Najmani This is how Shias make you docile so you don’t learn what they think about and want to do to you and us. If you are truly Sunni, you will know they are the Horn of Satan.
@davs3073Ай бұрын
Great scientific achievement. Wahhabi presenting shi'a beliefs!
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
Mashallah I would have never thought you would read into Shiasm. Just be careful of being one 😂
@davidlagoscelis5373Ай бұрын
Only Jesus Christ is the truth
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
Brother abdullah is clearly from nawasib cult
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@fariquainshah2938 which means Sunni in Shia words
@Zhong-meiАй бұрын
The true Islam is only manifest in the Quran therefore, has got nothing to do with historical Islam which resulted in many sects and cults such as Sunni, Shia and many other names which all are wrong and based on unauthenticated Ahadith and their writers. If there is no god(s) but Allah so there can't be any other book but the Glorious Quran. And finally, as the Quran says, that put your trust in Allah only as His Messenger did. Do you want better Hadith than Quran??? Period.
@user-hd3jk9cg1iАй бұрын
Not only Quran but also Sahih Hadith ,rejecting Sahih Hadith almost Similar to do kufr.
@user-hd3jk9cg1iАй бұрын
Don't be over smart ,we have Sahih Hadith ,sahih Hadith means we have full chains of narration till Prophet(PBUH) .Sahih Bukhari is💯 perfect and correct and after that Sahih Muslim also 💯authentic as most of the scholars consider . For example Quran says Pray Salah to Allah , when how will you pray you don't know ,the process of Salah is in Sahih(Authentic )Hadith ,As Prophet said pray like how you saw me to pray. So, Hadith rejectors can't be Muslim ,you cant reject teachings of Prophet (PBUH).Islam is 💯alive it can't be change or destroy amd teachings of Prophet (PBUH )can't be destroy bcz there will be no be Prophet come after him(PBUH), So Allah will Prophet all Authentic Hadithes and Quran for the Ummah who are righteous.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@user-hd3jk9cg1i Yes and Quran transmitters are the same as who transmitted Hadith. Very illogical to say hadith is false and lies. حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ، عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ صَالِحٍ، حَدَّثَنِي الْحَسَنُ بْنُ جَابِرٍ، عَنِ الْمِقْدَامِ بْنِ مَعْدِيكَرِبَ الْكِنْدِيِّ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَالَ " يُوشِكُ الرَّجُلُ مُتَّكِئًا عَلَى أَرِيكَتِهِ يُحَدَّثُ بِحَدِيثٍ مِنْ حَدِيثِي فَيَقُولُ بَيْنَنَا وَبَيْنَكُمْ كِتَابُ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَمَا وَجَدْنَا فِيهِ مِنْ حَلاَلٍ اسْتَحْلَلْنَاهُ وَمَا وَجَدْنَا فِيهِ مِنْ حَرَامٍ حَرَّمْنَاهُ . أَلاَ وَإِنَّ مَا حَرَّمَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ مِثْلُ مَا حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ " The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "Soon there will come a time that a man will be reclining on his pillow, and when one of my Ahadith is narrated he will say: 'The Book of Allah is (sufficient) between us and you. Whatever it states is permissible, we will take as permissible, and whatever it states is forbidden, we will take as forbidden.' Verily, whatever the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) has forbidden is like that which Allah has forbidden." Sunan Ibn Majah 12
@manhaj_sunnah20300Ай бұрын
You can't even provide accurate duration of the schooler and you consider your self an expert
@arsalanshaikh3763Ай бұрын
thanks for the insightful podcast, you called the foundations of zaydis as corrupt, but they are corrupt in your theological view. Your theological view is not the truth you could have said this is the zaydi view and I disagree.
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
This brother is slandering the jafri school of thought and is not qualified to provide a fair explanation of Shia school of thought
@deception6666Ай бұрын
Not theologically but Shia islam is Politically correct.. Sunnism is just numb..
@samirhachad643Ай бұрын
Of which shiism you speak of. If it's twellver chiism, theologically they don't have the right to have a political state until their Mahdi will appear. And the state of iran is against their believes, that's why the shirazis make takfir on Khomeini. For the zaidi shiism, they didn't have this restriction, that why almost all the shia state in history were zaidi. the Ismaili shiism also can create a states As long as the Imam appointed by God is visible. That why there's no Ismaili state now cause all the Ismaili sects have a hidden immams except for the aghakhanis For the sunnis😫.... They all, sadly, are under the The power of Western agent rulers. And any attempt to free themselves from them will face a brute force of killing and displacement.
@fariquainshah2938Ай бұрын
Seriously disappointed
@RebelLionheartАй бұрын
If sunnis gave the Ahlulbait the love and respect they deserve Shiism would quickly become irrelevant (general statement- some do demonstrate love for ahlulbait)
@hasanaliqadri1508Ай бұрын
Except for wahabi zombies all sunni love respect able bait and love on true sense not like shia who do non sharia things and treachery towards Islam and then talk about love of ahle bait.
@saadsalman4518Ай бұрын
@@hasanaliqadri1508graveworshipper ure gonna accuse a wahabi? What is a wahabi tell me , bafoon,
@saadsalman4518Ай бұрын
So shia loves ahlebait?😂 Joke of the century😂,
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@saadsalman4518 For real. They messed up their teachings and legacy with Sabaite ideology.
@ziauddin7948Ай бұрын
i want to disclose the reality that Imam Shaukani was the great Islamic Scholar & still today he is among the great Islamic scholar # there is a verse in Quran says " وتلو علیھم نبا اللذى اتيناه عن اياتنا........ فمثله كمثل الكلب " # " O prophet just inform them about the man we ( Allah almighty) had given ..... but he was just similar to a dog . if U throw ( a bone ) he ( dog ) comes with hanging tongue & if U hit him his tongue still hanging out " # no scholar haf ever interpreted who was that man Allah refers him as dog except Imam Shaukani said he was the prophet sent to the children of Israel # 🇵🇰
@ggzzbbАй бұрын
Biased take. He should have thoroughly tackled the exact reasons why zaidis and shias in general have a beef with sahaba and let the viewers make up their minds. Both sects, sunnis and shias, love to sanctify the people who surrounded the prophet even though he himself was just a human whose 3ssmah عصمة was only limited to the transfer of the Quran. The book already reprimanded the prophet himself a few times.
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@ggzzbb Yes in Shia hadiths all Sahaba are murtaddeen because they accepted Abu Bakr over Ali. EDIT: Except for 3 who became 7.
@alikazimi7724Ай бұрын
Disappointingly bigoted diatribe
@quranpl8445Ай бұрын
@@alikazimi7724 nope
@KnightofPowerАй бұрын
I get the feeling a bunch of these people didn’t even watch the video, and are commenting from their assumptions from the title alone. Otherwise they’re saying it’s bigotry not to regurgitate Shia dogma, which is absurd, of course.
@hasanaliqadri1508Ай бұрын
Your hearts have already been blackened.
@KnightofPowerАй бұрын
@@hasanaliqadri1508cope harder. We trust only in Allah, not in the human demigods with supernatural powers you worship