Mason had imperfect recall

Don’t spoil it for them!

What a moment that was on the big screen 😂

@@MicoDossunTrailer already spoiled that, along with the rest of the movie.

Yeeeeah baby! 😂

Only the crops are fucked!)

Bluuuuuuueeee...trivia

Ha, I understand that reference.

@@joshsharp6648 now you've gone too far buddy

Thank you, came down here to say this 🙃

​@@elizabetherickson9377Same here.

Just realized Die is “the” in German. Is Hard anything in German? Is it a totally alternative movie from Gruber’s perspective??

​@@ian-flanaganEverything in German is hard

@@ian-flanagan 1) realised* 2) no

Yeah, there was a real opportunity to show the parallels between Jane becoming godlike and Gorr wanting to destroy the gods, and what each of those cost them as people. But we just got kind of a nothing soup.

It's interesting how two movies that are so similar on paper had two so different receptions. They are both tragicomedies with flashy action in a sci-fi setting. Sure, they failed to tie the Gorr story to Jane's story well, but the wacky detour to the gladiator world wasn't well connected to Hela and the apocalypse of Thor's world in 3 either. I think it's fundamentally about the sort of tragedies that they are. Thor 3 had the passing of a father, sibling strife, a destruction of a world from a bird's eye view. Thor 4 had a main character suffering and dying from cancer, and a grieving father whose child died meaninglessly, then further kidnapped and imprisoned kids. Just way way darker in tone. If Thor 3 had lingered on Thor's grief for his slain friends, dead families on Asgard, or did more than gloss over the destruction of Valkyrie's sisters, then I think it would have broken that film as well.

That is such a good point! I was so excited for Gorr, I would have loved the gods quivering in fear as he got closer and closer to them. And maybe he could get a following of people who were wronged by their gods. But instead Thor 4

The real problem was that everyone was too cowardly to do what needed to be done and call it Thfour

@@TacticusPrime I think you make a good point there. I will say for me, though, I think that the Sakaar + Hela parts of Thor 3 were better connected, specifically because rather than Thor & the gang making the choice to go to Olympus as in Thor 4, Thor is literally stranded on Sakaar without his hammer, initially without allies, and having just lost his father and discovered that his brother is actually still alive. The connection is essentially that Sakaar is Thor's lowest point, the metaphorical valley that he has to climb out of to get back home. On the tragedy front, I agree 100%, Thor 4 deals with a lot darker plot & character points, and Thor 3 probably would've been similarly weighed down if it went that dark. The difference, I think, is that Thor 4 is just as, if not more of a rapid-fire comedy than Thor 3, all whilst getting far darker, and thus those competing tones didn't blend together the same. The thing that always impressed me about 3 was that even though it is a very goofy movie, it still managed to properly present the more tragic moments (ie Thor grieving Odin, Valkyrie's past, etc). It didn't linger on them that much, but they were definitely felt. I think part comes down to, as you said, it being from a bird's eye view: it felt like a smaller, more manageable story even though the stakes were pretty huge. It was also more directly tied to Thor, since the conflict is over his home versus him just being a god.

Guilty pleasure of mine.

The highway scene in FD 2 still holds up. And surprise surprise it's because a lot of it was practical effects

I went back to listen and it took my right back to my line cook days working kitchens lmao

Yeah i think Mythbusters did this. Body temp and blood pressure gets affected, but you won't suffocate

You could overheat, I’m sure, but the suffocation would be from breathing in fumes and dust from whatever you’re covered with, if at all possible. Like the original Tin Man actor breathing in aluminum dust from his body paint. The dude ended up in an oxygen tent, having permanent lung damage, and chronic bronchitis.

​@@itsd0nkIt didn't end well for Judy Garland either. The body-paint wasn't the only thing toxic on that set.

Forget Elon vs Zucc, i wanna see The Mouse kick the shit out DeSantis in a ring

So many soft sorry manchildren around here

Here for it

It's those ruthless preteen observational burns that always cut to the core.

He’s good at making negativity stick to people

Doesnt have the balls to bully a colored person

Is that why he couldnt beat a zombie in an election?

@@IamBrixTM All he does is say it over and over and over again

we're all in our grub era 🤝

Once a grub forever a grub!

Agreed! I think a lot of people forget that the original movie was FULL of then-contemprary slang, and each iteration of TMNT has its own take on that. I don't love pop-culture references in films cos it tends to date them badly, but this worked as well as it could without becoming too on the nose.

Because the living band members were heavily involved and they just wanted a jukebox musical that papered over the conflicts that they had with each other and especially Freddie.

@@TacticusPrime to my memory none of the conflicts between the band members actually happened. From what I saw behind the scenes footage it seemed like they were only there to give Rami Malek direction. If the movie's goal was to be a jukebox musical it failed tremendously.

@@PinkgloRadio ... it's the definition of a jukebox musical. It's just a greatest hits of Queen compilation on screen. The band members were constantly quarreling in real life, and film hangs all of Freddie's demons and all the conflict between the members on Paul Prenter, who conveniently died back in the 90s. It's preposterously shallow.

@@TacticusPrime I'm not saying the band members didn't have conflicts. I'm saying that the conflicts in the movie weren't the real ones, and that's not interesting to me. I am watching the movie for the band, not for some weird faux version that's just there to make money and have us smile because it's something we recognize. Sorry for wanting to feel something 🤷🏻

@@TacticusPrime whats a damn shame is that that movie got so much praise and traction while the Elton John one came and went when it was way better.

OK, this is quite a good point. I don't believe, per se, that the moon landing was fake; but I consider it to be the most plausible of the well known conspiracy theories. The USA's desperation to win the race to the moon, after losing the space race for 12 straight years to the USSR, would give them a powerful motive to fake it (and faking it would, presumably, be easier than really doing it). But, to your point, the USSR would also be motivated to expose the fraud, if they believed it was in fact fraud (and they were probably in a good position to know). So, I will now have to deduct points from how plausible I consider that conspiracy theory to be.

Blue Beetle was originally a Charleston comics character created in 1939. The "blue" in blue cheese is actually a mold