Aaron will be back

It’s the only reason I can cope with her not being a part of Daredevil Born Again. Pretty disappointed by that.

Is she really a guest anymore? Shes on it so often

I enjoy Deborah in everything she's part of.

Apocrypha2012 well said

Matt Crawley great point

And it doesn't hurt that she's cute also. :)

Dónde lo conseguiste?

@@KaNawogirusa se lo compré a alguien que lo trajo de afuera 😉

So true! But a good Inlay is also nice to have

@@Hardcorestilllives - yes, especially if it enhences the gameplay so I don’t have to fiddle out all needed components from tons of zipbags 😆

@@schoko-fan4370 so true! Zipbags are my nightmare

You are correct. Dave misunderstood that rule when he was teaching. I made the same sort of play later in the game. -Lincoln

@@BoardGameGeekExpress since i know that game, i have skiped the teaching part, which is usually brilliant. That explains why you did not line up the cards of your hands apart of the cards already in construction (but Deborah). That way, you can easily manage the rule of resources. Keep on playing, guyes, you are awsome!

Oh you corected that during final scoring. Nevermind then :D

And missed getting a financiers for building it.

That works! -Lincoln

If I had been planning for the Kickstarter timing I would have put this out weeks ago. It's actually coming to retail this week. -Lincoln

You should come in again.

Does Dave ever win? I am not knocking him as I love his rules explanations in general and I like his play style which is more of a "let's try this and see what happens regardless" I have watched almost every playthrough video yet strangely cannot recall a time Dave has won

Dave is a great player. He is very quick to figure out how game elements work together and can usually make a winning strategy. He is especially fantastic at deck-builders. Check out a few of those types of games to see him win. Oh and check our Fast Sloths. He had a great game on that one.-Lincoln

@@skyblazeeterno On the other hand, when I started watching this channel couple of years ago I was wondering "Does Dave ever lose"?

Thanatos elNyx ..... Spanish Inquisition?

Thanks for pointing that out! We do not want so many ads in our videos and I have to go in and manually remove a bunch. Thanks again.-Lincoln

Don't worry about Nikki ;-) -Lincoln

She also only took 1 gold instead of 3 gold that same round. @25:53

@@boardgamegeekGuess she just whooped you guys that much more :)

@@shauncrawford6529 ouch lol

and cubes from discarded planified buildings must go on the empire card

it doesnt really matter, bc at any time u can recycle cards or contruct them. i guess this is just in the rule so that players dont get confused about what they wanted to do, especially in the later rounds with lots of cards.

@@MarkBuschhaus you can recycle cards for resources only during the planification phase, and only the 7 drafted cards. Other recycled cards only give one fifth of a crystallium.

@@stephaneschneider2365 Dang it, it's right there on page 6: "Discarding a card Under Construction: At any time, you can discard one of your cards Under Construction. If you do, collect its Recycling Bonus, placing the Resource on your Empire card. You lose any cubes and Character tokens that were on the discarded card; they return to their respective supplies. Careful: This action is not particularly profitable; it is more efficient to recycle Development cards during the Planning phase, because you can place the Recycling Bonus on your cards Under Construction. This action is only useful to work toward generating Krystallium cubes, using cards you know you can no longer construct."

@@MarkBuschhaus It makes things more easily managable because the resource generated from a discarded card from your hand (bottom line) can be put wherever you want, on cards in construction OR on your civilation card, where, resources generated by discarded cards already in construction (top line) can only go on your civilitaion card, but cannot be used on cards on construction... SO it is easy if you first discard cards of you hand and collect the resources, then move the remaining cards to the construction line.. then pcae the collected resource cubes. and finally.. i lyou want yuo can discard cards from the construction line, put resources on your civilization card, eventually produce Kristalium, that you can you whenever you want

It really doesn't require that much space. If your tableau gets big then things might get out of control. We try to make it as open as possible so things a re somewhat visible. -Lincoln

I know Radho and Jon Gets Games use it to let people know when mistakes were discovered after posting the video. We don't use them but we should. Thanks for the note and for watching.-Lincoln

There are more than that. Nikki is the only one with a 100% attendance record. I will bow out if the game shouldn't have 5 or if we need 3 (and we have someone here to take the spot). -Lincoln

BoardGameGeek You all film this at your house as well, don’t you?

What? It doesn't look like Deborah? -Lincoln

@@boardgamegeek Unless Deborah did grow a beard while I wasn't looking..... oh you mean you're not in there Lincoln? Yeah now it all makes sense :D

Don't judge that by me - I'm not much of a theme gamer, and will always revert to colors or numbers when possible.

I'm with Mr. Arnott. I ignore theme as much as possible. Resources are distinguished by colour, or shape.

@@davidarnott6085 All good Dave, I'm like that with some games too. I just think better labeling, graphics, or shapes would help encourage theme rather than it being easily ignored.

I agree, the theme is not that present, But it doesn t mean, there is no logic in colour. Green (science )for instance, can be rewarding , but you have to stick on that strategy and luck can prevent you to get the needed green resource production.. (sometimes research fails...), on the other hand, exploration (blue) is much more versatile, you can build blue card with a mixture of green/gold/blue you can patch by discarding cards. so yes ; not a strong theme, but no, the theme is not at random neither

It's good as an abstract