Jati sunyo teti aananda. Jay Buddha. Gratitude to Swami Anand Arun swamiji .

Thank you for talking in 4 noble truth of Buddha... I would not have been able to understand its essence by mere reading it... Thank u swamiji for this brainstorming video..

Gurudev❤❤

Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu Swamiji! Thank u Bodhi channel!

Jai osho jai arun swji

Lots of love ❤️

we love you Swami jee

Yes ..beautiful and penetrating truth...

Very nice.thanks swami jee

So nice...

The real nature of this world(sansara) is dukha.the realization of dukha is begining step to realization of sunya.the desire to sukha is altimate cause of dukha.all living being are born of trisna(sukha bhoga, sex) and died on dukha bhoga(mritu).If we have to end dukha, we have cross this duality nature(opposite nature).the non dual nature is sunya.

❤❤❤

Thank u from sikkim

Ati ramro prabachan guru

Please can you add English subtitles, thanks

good spikinh

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

With all respect to Swami Ananda, and all the works he has done for spiritualism in Nepal, I have to say that his interpretation of Buddhism is misleading and sometimes outright wrong. He is concocting his own ideas about Buddha Dharma and its philosophies. He is not an authoritative person to interpret Buddhism. He makes several mistakes major or minor, while interpreting the teaching of the Buddha, just like his own master Rajaneesh ji. (1) It is wrong to say that understanding of First Arya Satya or First Noble Truth is enough. Neither Buddha said it, nor any of the Buddhists up-to present day, who are more authoritative than Swami Ananda to talk about it, would accept it. One needs all four noble one's truth in order to traverse the path and come out of the suffering, which is another name for Samsara. It is like saying "diagnosis of a disease is enough; we don't need to take medicine to be cured." It is not a new thing among Indian spiritual traditions, especially Sramana traditions, to identify our life with full of misery and suffering. But the interpretation of the Dukkha of the Buddha goes deeper. Swami Ananda is only familiar with the first and second layer of the meaning of dukkha, which is almost common to all Indian and other spiritual traditions, ie. Dukkhadukkhataa - the miseries and suffering mostly related with body and mental state and Viparinaama Dukkha - the suffering of due to change. But that is only two meanings of Dukkha according to the Buddha and they are bit superficial. The Buddha goes further deep, by saying Samskaara Dukkha ie the fact that all 'composed' phenomena (samskrta-dharma) are Dukkha. This is related with Four Noble One's Truth too in a sequence of pairs ( first is there because of the second, and third is there because of the fourth). What it means is that all Dharmas come about due to causes and conditions and they lack independence. This is a unique theory of causality, as taught by the Buddha, called "dependent origination" (Pratitya Samutpaada). Our body and mind both comes about due to other causes and conditions. This never ends until we consciously break the chain, which is taught in the 12 links of dependent origination. In short, anything that comes about due to causes and conditions has three or four marks or characteristics: it is impermanent (anitya), suffering (dukkha), non-self (anatma) and sunya (empty of inherent existence). Only through deeper understanding and first hand realization of this aspect of Dukkha taught by the Buddha that liberates us. Swami Ananda has missed this point by miles while he mentioned the term Dukkha. We desire (trisnaa) because we misunderstand the basic reality of all the composed phenomena. (2) Buddha's line of awakening is completely different from any of the Indian Darsana-s. AB odhisattva, a candidate for Buddhahood, learns from other Buddhas, and these Buddhas help to produce future Buddhas. So, there is no way that the Buddha "summarized" all the other Darsana-s (philosophies) and presented it to the audience in a syncretic way. Buddhiam is not the 'cream" of all the other Indian philosophies. Buddhism is a unique philosophy and spiritual path, never heard or taught by any Rshis, or Munis in the ancient India. You can read Nagara Sutta and Dhammacakkapavatana Sutta, where the Buddha makes this claim. Buddhists do not take Veda or Purana, or Upanishad as authentic and having contained even a grain of truth. The Buddha and all Buddhist masters always refuted anything within those scriptures and said that they are full of wrong views and ideas (mithyaa-drsti). For Buddhists, these scriptures are like sand, which would never give oil (moksha), however you press it. So, it is out of question that the Buddha 'churned' them all and took out the cream (nauni) called Buddhism. (later you will see in other videos that Swami Ananda would talk about "witness" (sakshi) as the teaching of the Buddha, which is totally wrong. Please look at the comment section of other videos too, where I would leave pertinent comment about his misinterpretations). (3) Maara is not only mind. This is another modernist interpretation, and is totally wrong. There are four Maaras and one of them is a Deva, called Devaputra maara. (4) There are many Jatakas, the past life story of the Buddha, where the Bodhisattva, the future Buddha, was born as different animals such as hare and elephant. But, the Jataka of the elephant and the hare do no exist, and hence, it cannot be the instance in which the future Buddha (bodhisattva at that time) generated his wish to be the Buddha (bodhicitta). Swami ji concocted his own story. There are other stories both within Pali tradition and Mahayana tradition which describes for what reason and under which circumstance the bodhisattva, the future buddha to be, generated the mind of bodhi. Why to fabricate stories when they are actually present within the Buddhist scriptures? (4) There weren't only 500 Enlightened Bhikkhus (arhat). There were thousands, including Bhikkhunis. It was a convention in India to write anything in a round about figure. Furthermore, Mahayana scriptures mentions even more astronomical figure about the disciples who were Enlightened (different stages) within the lifetime of the Buddha.

Four NTs Truth of Suffering Truth of reason /cause of Suffering Truth of cessasion /end of Suffering Truth of way of end of Suffering... Sadhu x3 In nep/skt... DukhA SATYA SAMUDAYA SATYa Nirodh satya Marga satya _/\_ ♥·♥ om mune x2 mahamune sakymune swoha ..

Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu,,,,,Four Noble Truth

"Osho is Maitreya Buddha" Vanney manche ko Bouddha dharma deshana rakhna laaj lagnu parne Bodhi TV lai. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sLiCpduJrKiainU.html

नोट : शाक्य मुनि गौतमले सयकडौं हजारौं लाखौं करोडौं अरबौं खरबौं संख्यौँ असंख्य आफ्नो जन्म सनातन रुपमा भएको पाउँदा बिगत कति पर सम्म त्यसो भएछ भनि हेर्दै जाँदा त ९६ पटक विश्वब्रह्माण्ड बिग्रेर बनेको अर्थात् बिगबेङ्गहरुले त्यसमा बन्दै बिग्रंदै उत्त्पन्न हुने पृथिबीहरुमा दुख:कष्ट अर्थात् जन्मिने-बाँच्ने-रोगाउने-मर्ने अर्थात् 'दुख:' गुजारेको बोध गरे। त्यसकारण आफु सबैभन्दा जेठो भएको भने। घाम जून नक्षेत्रहरु आफु भन्दा ९६ बिग्बेङ्गब्रह्माण्ड आयू कान्छो रहेछन् भनि जाने। … क्रमश,

Sadhu sadhu sadhu

Lama hari red dress lagaera masu khaeko dekhthe tra wastabik buddha darsan eti marmik x

Kati raamro bachan.god le nai boleko jasto laagyo.malai swami jee Ko haat baata dikshya linu man chha.

Pura bujyo.. Ha ha ha ha..

Budda itihas Ra Darshan ko addhyan garau.

What kind of hotchpotch teaching is this? Why is Bodhi TV promoting such non Buddhist teachings in the name of Buddhism?