Hmmmmmmm. I’ll have to concur.

It isn't indifference it is distain.

​@Chris Madison The other service branches jokingly refer to the Marines as "crayon eaters" to insinuate low IQ. We need a similar name for cops. I suggest "booger eaters" to indicate the low IQ of cops, which is a fact. You must be a booger eater. 😅

@Chris Madison The body cam exposed your domestic terrorists in blue. May the next Aaron dean find you as you are and l ave you as fertilizer that is useful to society.

@Chris Madison Also as a question of curiosity. Despite police having a job 1/3 as deadly as a garbage men you also seem much less efficient. Why does it take hundreds of taxpayer funded police officers just to dump a piece of garbage off in the ground. Those caravans delivering trash to the ground upset traffic.

The laws don't apply to the Thin Blue Line Gang though Cobra.

Yeah committing any crime while in the possession of a firearm is an enhancement that can get us civilians several years

There is no denying this. The cops have made it an "us vs. them" mentality.

They do it to protect their precious CORPORATIONS.

That PIG needs to be "unretired" long enough to be held accountable.

Battery

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

@@ThePeachtree69 Depends on state.

It’s aggravated kidnapping after the battery.

‼THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING INFRINGED UPON WHILE THE MASSES ARE DISTRACTED BY "ALIENS, TRANS CANS AND ONLYFANS. _if "they" can violate the 1st amendment, what stops them from violating the rest?

Except these 'Highly Trained Professionals' with badges and guns.

sadly "anybody" in your statement is roughly 50% of people because there are just as many bootlickers as there are moral americans.

You would not believe how many people commenting on the original vid do not plainly see that. We live in a time of idiocity, and far too many americans not only do not understand their rights but actively despise them.

Clearly!

wrong

No, they retire or resign so they can't be fired. They retain their certification that way, and can continue their tyranny in the next town over. He can certainly still be charged, but they won't - they almost never do.

Sure I robbed the bank, but I retired from robbing banks so I shouldn't be charged.

They usually retire to keep all their pension benefits intact when a lawsuit or investigation is imminent. Crooked cops do it all the time...

💯💯💯💯

@@roomwithapointofview we should all be allowed that luxury. All public officials get a free pass on past crimes, and a platinum parachute to retire with.

I agree. A cop under investigation, like this animal was, should not be allowed to retire or collect benefits until the conclusion of the investigation and any legal action. Close off that avenue of escape.

If he resigns, the city shouldn't defend him or pay any settlement. Let the officer do it on his own.

I want him to be PAID, But it SUCK THE BILL GOES TO THE TAX PAYERS. 🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♂️

I’m just saying….. when I had a 3 car Hauler with a 1 ton Dodge. I had to carry at the Minimum……. 1 Million insurance policy….. So why don’t they?????

@@treschou6695 Thanks for reading my post👍🏿

Blue line privileges

Americans have to realize that they need to be conscientious of who their DAs are. They have to know who they are voting for instead of just ticking the party line. If a DA runs on police accountability then vote him in. But Americans are too preoccupied with internet porn, TV talent shows, homosexual pedophile rights, and fast food.

Maybe not you personally, sorry, but people who do

‼THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING INFRINGED UPON WHILE THE MASSES ARE DISTRACTED BY "ALIENS, TRANS CANS AND ONLYFANS. _if "they" can violate the 1st amendment, what stops them from violating the rest?

@@Thinks-First Homosexual pedophile rights? Oh you're one of the Facebook/Fox News types.

Violation under federal law 18 USC 242 deprivation of rights under color of law.

I say put into police employment contracts that they indemnify the city up to 5% of any lawsuit settlement or judgement. Do that and you will have the most respectful law abiding police force in history. If my doctor has to carry malpractice insurance why shouldn't the cops ?

END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!!!

THEY'RE ALL CROOKS.

Yup - and make him pay from his pension.

HOW WAS HE ABLE 2 RETIRE DURING A CIVIL LAWSUIT EYE CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY THE ENTIRE COUNTRY IS NOT UP IN ARMS!!!

Charge him under 18 USC 242, deprivation of rights under color of law. Let him spend his “retirement” in federal prison!!

Fart noise

Yes and the prosecutor

💯💯🎯🎯

At very least block his pension until the investigation is over. That will limit their ability to use retirement as a "get out of jail" free card.

I don't believe they should lose their pension. But I don't believe the citizens should be the ones paying for the lawsuit.

SCOTUS disagrees

99% of them don't even know the 5 Elements of the 1st Amendment.. They're clueless

The thin blue-LINE between lawful and unlawful order is what causes cops to escalate use of force during everyday interactions. From a legal precedent, not a standard, we have a right to refuse unlawful order from police - problem is courts failure to define what a lawful order is - its referred to by legal scholars and the courts as "the lawful order problem". [See ORIN KERR: Sandra Bland and the “lawful order” problem]. The Court has avoided clarifying the right of an individual to disobey a police officer's unwarranted order ... "By basing decisions on narrower grounds; the Court has chosen not to come to grips with the fundamental issue of the rights and limitations of dis­obeying a police order. Because of an apparent inconsistency in the courts, i.e. Civil Rights cases are treated differently from other situa­tions, it is urged that an attempt be made to establish a general rule instead of continuing to decide cases in an ad hoc fashion as reactions to particular errors of the police in civil rights situations." Now pending before the United States Supreme Court is a case awaiting ruling on the 'The Right to Disobey' police orders'. Unfortunately, our legal system works only to correct wrongs after they have happened. There is no legal mechanism for prevention. The majority of present-day court opinions follow this case law example: “simply stated, the law recognizes that liberty can be restored through legal processes, but life or limb cannot be repaired in a courtroom. And so, it holds that the reason for outlawing resistance to an unlawful arrest and requiring disputes to be resolved in the courts has no controlling application on the right to resist an officers' excessive force.” On the other hand, law also recognizes qualified immunity for police which exempts them from responsibility for poor decisions and misconduct. During recent argument in a similar case heard before the (NJ) Supreme Court the following exchange took place as reported in the press. The defense attorney was quoted as saying, "a person has a public duty to refuse to obey an illegal police order." Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub's answer was, "You'd have anarchy if you didn't have order." To this the defense attorney replied, "It's a police state otherwise."

@@victorflores7594 Yeah - that's not correct. The "first amendment auditors" lie to their audience about what the first amendment entails, and their audience then assumes that police enforcing the ACTUAL law "don't know the first amendment"

You don't need to know the law to know that this guy wasn't trying to assault the officer tho... Just a little bit of common sense. 😂

HOW IS THIS ALLOWED??? IF WE BREAK THE LAWS, WE GO TO JAIL... WHY ISN'T THAT OFFICER IN JAIL???

Police don't pay, taxpayers do.

@@cococonlin170 And ypur point being?

@@cococonlin170I think this time they might because it’s been “clearly established” in the law that you can be arrested for filming police and it’s obvious that 1- he was walking away when he was approached. 2-the camera was smacked out of his hands for no lawful reason. He’ll get $50-$125,000

@@cococonlin170 Good! Taxpayers need to pay through the nose until they do something

@@Logan-mq8om My point is, the police department is not financially responsible, the city pays out of their funds. Maybe that's why our roads, parks, schools are falling apart. How much is sacrificed so the boys in blue can continue to behave like thugs?

Billions in taxpayer funds have covered for police atrocities across America and nothing has changed.

The suit will be settled so it wont set a legal precedent that could strip qualified immunity for future incidents.

@@PromptCriticalJello Umm no. Even if it wasn't "settled" - it wouldn't change qualified immunity. Qualified immunity laws are set at the State, or in the case of Civil Rights - set by the Federal Courts. And since SCOTUS has already repeatedly heard cases against qualified immunity, this federal judge will follow THAT precedent. And - quite frankly - qualified immunity doesn't need to be changed. The standard is pretty reasonable: _if a reasonable police officer in their position would believe their actions to be lawful - then they are entitled to qualified immunity. Otherwise, they are not_ It gives plenty of room to sue bad cops who flagrantly break the law while still protecting police directly from frivolous lawsuits or honest mistakes.

Not gonna happen, say hi to the new boss, same as the old boss. The police think they are sovereign citizens. They are anti constitution. Shameful.

@@fenix6297 Doesn't Qualified Immunity just protect from CRIMINAL charges and as such frivolous lawsuits are not an issue?

Why can't you people see these frauditors for what they really are? What they do has nothing to do with education. It has nothing to do with auditing. What it IS about is harassing and smart mouthing the staff and public at these sites trying to provoke a confrontation to impress thier brown noser fan club for more likes and views for the KZfaq money. And that's all it is. Do any of you think these clowns with cameras would do what they do if they didnt get paid for it?

WHY DO THE AMERICAN CITIZENS ALLOW THIS????

To find out more about why unreasonable use of force is part of the culture in blue-LINE policing - look up the military's "LINE system" with tactical implication in use of force . Officially, the "LINE" name stands for "Linear Infighting Neural-override Engagement" ... "designed to be executed within specific and stringent combat-oriented conditions: proper execution of the techniques must cause death to the opponent". A shocking endorsement to a culture of excessive force in a police state.

Yep. That's exactly it. These cops used their position as police to feed their egos. It's obvious to ANYONE viewing the video. Both should be in prison right now. This double standard has to stop. And it is. The people now SEE thanks to KZfaq and auditors what cops are REALLY about. I used to believe in them and wanted to help them. Now I keep my distance and wouldn't raise a finger to help the blue gang. They want an "us vs. them" mentality, they got it. Outlaw police unions. Roll back Qualified Immunity.

‼THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING INFRINGED UPON WHILE THE MASSES ARE DISTRACTED BY "ALIENS, TRANS CANS AND ONLYFANS. _if "they" can violate the 1st amendment, what stops them from violating the rest?

Film hasn't been used in over 40 years.

@@robertyoung9589 not knowing 'film' applies to a genre of stylistic or thematic category that includes ubiquitous electronic media (used as motion pictures & sound) is ignorant - in other words we can "film" with our cell phones

He's an old man I'm sure he was about to retire prior to this situation took place.

@@VioletWings1353 yeah, in a few YEAR'S after his pension built up a bit more.

Deceptive euphemisms is the only language they speak besides blatant lies.

City, no case.Auditer, BIG TIME!!!

Don't fool yourself. Change is coming. You think that animal cop wanted to retire? Nope. He was told to. He's scared shitless and so is his boss. None of this would have happened without KZfaq and citizens with cameras. Police power is being eaten away video by video and there's nothing they can do about it. Before KZfaq that cop would still be working. Now he's a public relations liability. An embarrassment to the dept, the town, and the politicians in power. He is an anchor around their necks. So they forced him to retire. One less animal on the force. And some young cop is going to see this and say to himself that he wouldn't want to be in that cop's shoes. Change is here. It's right in front of you. Of course I'd rather see the cop perp walked into jail. But all in due time.

Blue line brotherhood of criminality.

BUT HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO HELP HIM... SCARY A$$.

Why can't you people see these frauditors for what they really are? What they do has nothing to do with education. It has nothing to do with auditing. What it IS about is harassing and smart mouthing the staff and public at these sites trying to provoke a confrontation to impress thier brown noser fan club for more likes and views for the KZfaq money. And that's all it is. Do any of you think these clowns with cameras would do what they do if they didnt get paid for it?

As a mainstream photojournalist, now independent - I could shed some light. In the 1980's when print started to lose circulation to digital medias many news organizations cut staff and re-tooled departments to compete. Permanently gone were big budgets for in depth investigative journalism. I speak from experience as I'm from a family steep in editorial management with dozens of Pulitzer prizes for investigative journalism. They are all retired with exception of one - she won a Pulitzer in 2011 for investigative reporting. Journalism today is far different than when Woodward and Bernstein worked for my father. No reporter with integrity would file a biased story word-for-word verbatim from police narrative. Today it's common practice for television stations to parrot complete police narratives ignoring obvious exculpatory evidence. With little or no budget for investigative journalism networks just don't bother checking actual facts anymore. Today's youthful anchors are more concerned with appearance over substance. Newscast spend a lot of effort in complicated graphics packages for effects, presenting so called experts to argue pro and con opinions on the weather outside instead of going over the the f*cking window and investigating if its raining for themselves. Why - because network ownership is heavily invested in umbrellas. Note the irony with this TV reporter to suggest journalists who record police are unreasonable and even 'agitators' - a nonsense narrative directly out of police PR pages - that ignores 1A rights.

SO SAD.

Most media is purchased by the cities and won’t air this stuff because of fear they won’t find their media outlet anymore.

You will see smaller, local news stations do a fairly good job covering police tyranny. (Maracopa County in Phoenix, for example)

But the citizens have to pay.

‼THE 2ND AMENDMENT IS CURRENTLY BEING INFRINGED UPON WHILE THE MASSES ARE DISTRACTED BY "ALIENS, TRANS CANS AND ONLYFANS. _if "they" can violate the 1st amendment, what stops them from violating the rest?

THEY ARE ALL CROOKS... ABOLISH QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

They should get federal charges. Then they can be referred to as prisoner. 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Why can't you people see these frauditors for what they really are? What they do has nothing to do with education. It has nothing to do with auditing. What it IS about is harassing and smart mouthing the staff and public at these sites trying to provoke a confrontation to impress thier brown noser fan club for more likes and views for the KZfaq money. And that's all it is. Do any of you think these clowns with cameras would do what they do if they didnt get paid for it?

True. The cops are a criminal gang of thugs that torture and murder citizens for fun and profit. Canada and America are totally corrupt lawless industrial penal colonies.

END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!!!SAVE YOUR TOWN$$$!!

SO WHAT DO THE CITIZENS DO THEN, IF THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS RIGGED???

Getting so f ing tired of seeing it daily

Get ready for another decade

Funny how the local district attorney becomes blind to crime if you were wearing a badge when you committed it...

Yet did nothing

If there were any good cops there would be no bad cops.

Amazingly the good cops are NEVER around when a bad one is committing crimes against the people

They will never correct each other in front of the public. Their pride is worth more than our lives and the millions in settlement money it costs.

There’s no such thing as a good cop.

WE'VE BEEN ALLOWING THIS NONSENSE TO MANIFEST FOR DECADES NOW SO WHY ARE Y'ALL COMPLAINING??? YOU CAN'T PUT THE JENEE BACK IN THE BOX.

Why? They got sued, therefore QI was removed! Working as intended, right? If you knew what you were spewing, you would support QI…but, you have no clue what QI is, so you just parrot buzz phrases, amirite?

@@cowboyx9380what did you just spew out of your trap you clown?😂

Just because you are sued doesn't mean you lost your qualified immunity. Posting with emotions to protect your heroes isn't that cute of a look.​@@cowboyx9380

They have police unions usually with the police chief, Lt, somebody high ranking or smth, and qualified immunity to protect the 👮 so IMO, they can legitimately get away with most things, esp if it wasn’t recorded, their word against urs

Officer safety is apparently more important than citizen safety.

Excellent points. End qualified immunity.

Qualified Immunity is already denied when cops "willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States". We have existing rule of law to combat cops willful and ignorant use in color of law - government rarely sees' fit to use it.

​@@coponetwork lol no it's not. It's up to whatever judge gets the case. It's not a clear-cut dry thing. As long as they say that they didn't know they were violating their rights then they usually get a free pass.

THE DISTURBING PART IS THAT EVERYONE WAS COOL WITH THE INJUSTICE WHEN IT WAS DONE TO ONLY BLACK PEOPLE

That's not true. Treating people the way you want to be treated has always been my families way. Remember, we are all gods children.@@rockyduck5716

ABOLISH QUALIFIED IMMUNITY... NOW!!!!

Yeah, they're bullies.

We do have such an institution; it’s called the FBI. Check their website. But, on the other hand, aren’t they the biggest liars the country has? 🤠

He already retired to avoid the consequences.

@@AnthonyT50 yeah I know I caught that at the end of the video

@@AnthonyT50 He was allowed to retire by the Chief he should have been fired and not allowed to get his pension.

@@cobracommander9138 That is the MO of all police departments. Somehow the charges go away for police if they just retire. It doesn't work that way for the rest of us non blue line gang though.

BUT IT WAS FINE AS LONG AS YOUR BLACK... NOW ITS A PROBLEM.

Joseph Biden and all of the Communist Democrats as well.

ITS COOL 2 BURST BLACK PEOPLE HEAD AND VIOLATE OUR RIGHTS , BUT NOW SENSE THEY'RE SPLITTING UR WIG IT'S A PROBLEM!!!! MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Did you even read the headline??????? It's what he's doing. It's literally what the video is about.

@@danielboone8435 Yeah! Sue! Sue! Sue! "Why you so butt hurt bruh????????????????"

@@mrsatire9475 Do you ever look around your mom's spare bedroom and wonder if you could be doing something more important with your life? The answer is no.

@@danielboone8435 Look when you posted that. During the middle of the day you're slacking off on KZfaq. Get a job, loser! "Why you so butt hurt bruh????????????????

Unfortunately as far as I know, California is the only state you could do that and still actually be considered a law abiding citizen.