This particular power move goes so hard I can't even describe the awe I feel

Nahhh that's cold 🥶

Duuuude I love it

Fella was taking trophies

Thats the tabletop version of showing decapitated heads to enemies hahahaha

omg i died

Puny god

After all, player removal is best removal and no one likes player removal more than Gruul.

@@apocalypticsword5524 why use counterspell when 7 Bolts do trick

What a nice fella this guy is, kinda cool

I bought my Friend's collection, which had a Bobo deck. Still have it. Still chucking lands at people's faces. Still fun as hell.

The dude played "honest" Bullshit.

I am an Honest Bullshit player! LOL Groundskeeper (AKA Trampoline Man) is an All-Star in my Boogie-Boros deck.

Keen Sense plus Abundance is a fun combo, "Oh you thought I was going to run out lands? That's cute"

Oh it's landfall, just built different. When they yeet it, the land will fall. It just falls on top of YOU.

Oh it's land fall. Watch as 20 forests and 10 mountains fall on your face

Landfly? Landfling? Landing (on your opponents head)?

You don't get it. Its Landthrow

I mean, isn't Gruul's whole thing nature's fury?

Nah, this is Borborygmos when he’s Gruul-mad. He’s mad normally, this is him when he is _actually_ mad, mad enough to chuck entire forests and mountains at you.

Clearly you have never met someone who is into vore

Someone who would eat dirt and swallow anything coming their way while being built like a shithouse cannot get it? I would only refuse service if he would not at least clean his parts up a bit. And nowhere in Gruul does it say they do not clean. Nature is a bit grimy, yes, but fire/lightning can burn so good...I mean disinfect.

That is stupidly badass amd i am officially considering building it.

@@donniejefferson9554 tried it for the meme its hilarious but will only work once

“I’ll just divide my library into 3 piles to save time. Now everybody choose a pile and take 3 times that much damage”

I want to be friends with that guy, because that is epic

​@@KhanGarthI DID build this deck after another KZfaqr did a similar video, but I did have the unfortunate pleasure of playing with one of those decks that cares about timing/number of times an effect goes off, which I carelessly forgot about, and this player managed to do something genuinely unhinged: anytime I drew a card, I milled a card. I almost decked myself out before I could murder the table because I wasn't paying attention to this dude's board state. I had to instinctively murder that guy before the others after I was already midway on beating another guy with a mountain and some trees

@@user-nu3hf2ws8b (um actually your um actually) That was not the rule change. It was always true that to "name" a card you were only ever required to "unambiguously identify it", any sufficient description of the card has worked since way back. You never needed the actual name. The actual issue with Borbor was that the original from Guildpact had the exact full name "Borborygmos", so the argument was that if you named exactly "Borborygmos" you HAD identified only one specific card in "Borborygmos" and therefore not the "Borborygmos Enraged" that people actually played. This was previously a problem with "Vedalken Shackles" (an artifact always just called Shackles) and "Shackles" (an obscure enchantment). The actual "Borborygmos rule change" was that there needs to be "no possible confusion" even if what you named is a full card name, and if there is any uncertainty both players have a duty to "immediately clarify" it. In practice, it means that now the Namer has the hammer if the opponent doesn't confront an ambiguous name. If there's any reasonable disagreement about a name, the Namer gets to "clarify what they meant to name" at the time the disagreement is brought to light, to their advantage.

The most annoying shit a friend of mine did was in a 1v1 commander game, he played Meren and looped spore frog for the sac trigger every turn, bringing it back each turn so you couldnt deal combat damage

​@@ttadecoded1033shib you might have been playing against me that one time lol

​@@ttadecoded1033I see you too have been made to suffer the wrath of the Shadow Wizard Compost Gang

​@@ttadecoded1033classic

I see you have mastered the art of "big stick diplomacy"

Yes Yes, Boogie-Boros best diplomat!

Note that the ability doesn't deal Commander damage

​@@Qrilvery important note

@@Qril Good point! Your comment prompted me to search and learn that only combat damage counts toward commander damage. It's a bummer for the way my brothers and I have been playing my Zurgo Helmsmasher deck ;)

Yeah, giving Gruul a free tutor was probably not a great idea lol

Abundance. You're welcome

Don't forget keen sense and it's lesser brother sixth sense. Giving green a curiosity is a fun mistake

I guess it's more fun to kill someone by pitching three lands rather than two?

@@collinbeal It's less because it's fun and more because the opponent chooses the ordering, which means they'll always multiply before adding.

Grafted Exoskeleton loses to Fiery Emancipation. And I did the math: One turn, x3 burn: 27 damage One turn, Poison: 3 Poison Second turn, x3 burn: 27 damage (dead) Second turn, Poison: 6 Poison (still alive) Thus, it takes twice as long to kill an opponent with Grafted Exoskeleton than it does with Fiery Emancipation.

​@@isaiahwelch8066What kind of math did you use where 3 times 3 = 27?

​@@schwindelier1449dude it's 3 per land x3 so 9 per land. So if you yeet 3 lands a turn it's 27 dmg vs 3 poison a turn. So for around the same amount of mana it's more cost efficient to go dmg doubling rather than poisoning.

@@isaiahwelch8066 3 x 3 = 9. 40 / 9 means 5 discards to kill. 10 / 3 means 4 discards to kill.

@magicalmadness It's not 1 poison per damage though. Infect turns the damage into poison counters at a 1-to-1 basis. So the math is 3 poison per discard vs 9 damage per discard.

For me it's Grand Warlord Radha. "Listen, I have to attack to make mana, it's just how the deck works, no hard feelings." "Oh look, an 8 drop on turn 4" "hey, check out my 6/6 token army. Guess how much mana they make when I turn them sideways." Great memories once of a full-bore Trostani deck with Karametra out too just having absolutely nothing on Radha's velocity.

Um, on an unrelated note Greasefang looks like SUCH A FUN DECK

I did that once and It. Was. Glorious.

What's the purpose of Abundance in this case? Wouldn't Snake Umbra and 98 lands just draw you into land every time?

​@PhoenicopterusR Abundance means you can run an actual deck with a normal amount of lands and still get all of them.

@@Darchias sounds complicated. fling land draw card much simpler.

​@@PhoenicopterusRthe purpose is to watch a bun dance

Seconding Sephara, I run her in mono white angel. Get your crosses, they won't save you.

idk I think land trebuchet is funnier

Land *YEET*

Based. ❤

That card is only playable on this deck 😆

Same

Instead of needing 14 lands, you just need 10 barring any modifier on Ojer.