Agreed!

I just recently watched this film, and I struggled to finish it. While the transfer itself might have been good, the way most everything is CGI, and bad CGI at that just makes the overall visual appeal extremely low for me. I wouldn't say it looks as bad as something you'd see on SyFy, but the effects stood out so much that it may as well have been.

Best steampunk style movie in 4k. Looks great

I'm still trying to figure that movie out.

IMO the only great movie on this list. 65 was terrible. The Creator tried to do too much in a limited amount of time. I know that they were going for a T2 human/machine heartfelt connection but they fell way short. The vast majority of these movies deserved to be box office bombs.

I honestly love the Aquaman sequel tbh even a little more than the first one. But don't buy into people hating it because,it's always funny how quick those limited edition steelbooks sell out for said disliked movies all the time

@@dominicarroyo6269 yeah I liked it a lot. A great sequel to the original. Did way better at the box office than expected. A lot of people said it wouldn't even come close to making as much as the Marvels but in reality, it left the Marvels in the dust.

I noticed that too So glad I got mine

@lordrayden3045 yeah. When I saw it on Amazon a few years ago, instant purchase. today they are going for over $200.00 on ebay. Lots of 4k blu-rays increasing in value.

I agree its brilliant, but the reason it gets a lot of hate, is becuase movie purists don't like that its shot at 60fps.

​@@servare2599honestly I feel like it makes the movie stand out more imo. Brought the 4k steelbook for $9 and it's one of the movies I enjoy when I watch it. I do wish some would try out the 60fps here and there especially more sci-fi movies

Agreed, Gemini Man is great, both the movie and the audio/video.

Poor story and it looks like a video game that's why it deserves all the hate it gets.

Cuz it's crap

Dude that movie is a super hot mess that has amazing visuals and great world building. I watch it twice a year along with its sister Valeria. Hehe

@@zzygyy Valerian is one of my others! Anything Luc Besson tickles my fancy no matter what the quality. And the 4K is outstanding.

@@zzygyy I was just thinking "I need to get Jupiter Ascending, oh and Valerian too"! Both interesting, imaginative and visually spectacular films that are under rated.

​@@fiachramacaodha1260yea I have both and while they aren't perfect at all,they are enjoyable tbh and looks amazing

You unmute it though for the scenes where he goes unhinged right? He is hilariously spectacular

I have at least ten more so that may be possible.

Maybe it's just my TV settings, but the action/movements looked fake and cartoonish. After 20 minutes I had to turn it off. Same for Aquaman.

I would bloody too man. I would wish 60 or 120 fps becomes the new standard. There's just so much more you can see per scene and motion resolution just increases tremendously.

​@@sermerlin1not the new standard but should be something that's welcomed more in the space of Cinema. Imagine more sci-fi movies or horror movies at 60fps

@@dominicarroyo6269 imagine everything in 60 fps. Literally. Still shots panning shots dialog shots. The increase in detail and motion resolution would be greater then getting quality going from 1080p to 2160p. Unfortunately that is still far in the distance.

@@sermerlin1 it's not like they can't do it now. They definitely can,it's just alot of people within the industry and people that are into cinema don't and won't like that idea of a movie like that hence why it's hardly been done

@@dominicarroyo6269 I don't think they technologically can, still. It is hella expensive to do anything above 23.976 fps. The expensive cameras they use would eat 3 to 5x as many tapes (or with digital cameras, space). VFX would take like 3 to 5x as much time to finish rendering which will increase costs tremendously so they can't just go "edit it in the post" and "redo the vfx we need to change scenes"... Post process effects... Then scene effects... The costumes, the set piece itself. in 23.976 fps you can literally hide a lot of set piece errors, the costumes into the blur of low fps but at 60 or especially 120... EVERYTHING is revealed. All the flaws and fakery of it since now you can shake the camera but you see all of the background and foreground due increased motion resolution (much increased clarity in motion). So far they've been able to produce few movies that were... Crap to begin with. Not because of FPS standard but because they were rather low budget and story was just... crap. Remember hobbit in 48 fps? Yeah the VFX was so awful and the background that in 48 fps (which is 100% motion resolution increase) you literally see how bad everything is. Avatar 2 was and is the first high framerate movie that literally shows how crappy 24 fps standard is. I just wish whole movie was in 48 fps or 60 or 120... instead of jogging between 24 and 48. You can clearly see how much clear and how much more of the liveliness you can perceive as soon as it switches to 48 fps (the spores, the movements of the foliage, the wisps floating in the air, the actual motion of characters) and when it gets switched back to 24 fps everything just appears dead still and blurred and stuttery as soon as panning is in action.

I know they say its the way the film creators wanted it to look but i cant stand having like 40 inches out of my 75 inch picture just be black bars haha

I almost bought The Creator. I'm glad that I didn't.

​@@walter2695did you see this at the cinema and ask for a rebate on the price of your ticket when it didn't fill the whole screen😂🤣👍

It clearly states on the back of the case that the aspect ratio is 2.76:1 so I'm not sure what else you would need to know?

The Creator 👎

Hi, The Ulysses cut comes on a blu ray and is 1080p.

@@snoopy1201 on the universal disk yes, I think in the arrow release it’s 4K?

@branscombe_ Hi, I have the UK Arrow release. Only the original version is in 4K. The other 2 cuts are both on blu rays.

@@snoopy1201 okay thanks!

Starts off good. Great world building and visuals.

I think time will be kinder to Babylon.

@@MovieGuy365 I hope so

And you won’t.

Rats. Foiled again.@@MovieGuy365

I've got Gemini Man on 4K, and it didn't look jarred to me either. I thought it looked great.

"jarring" doesn't mean bad. he said it's a great visual.

I don't hate it but it rates very high on my personal "most unnecessary sequels of all time" list. They should have left the franchise alone.

Blade Runner 2049 is a dull and tedious movie. Never again!

Your opinion