The Nature of Science

Рет қаралды 311,226

Күн бұрын

In this video Paul Andersen explains the nature of science. He describes how science is a way of knowing about the natural world. Scientists develop investigations to gather evidence and make explanations about how the natural world works. These explanations are constantly critiqued over time. Most importantly science is a human endeavor.
Alex Dainis - Science Vlog - • I'm Starting a Science...
Do you speak another language? Help me translate my videos:
www.bozemanscience.com/transla...
Music Attribution
Intro
Title: I4dsong_loop_main.wav
Artist: CosmicD
Link to sound: www.freesound.org/people/Cosmi...
Creative Commons Atribution License
Outro
Title: String Theory
Artist: Herman Jolly
sunsetvalley.bandcamp.com/trac...
All of the images are licensed under creative commons and public domain licensing:
Agriculture, U. S. D. of. (2012). U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) nematologist/pathologist Lynn Cart and Electron and Confocal Microscopy Unit director Gary Bauchan use a low temperature scanning electron microscope. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
al, B. P. A. et. (2016). English: LIGO measurement of gravitational waves. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
atmos, J. (2009). English: Diagram of the possible mechanism for CRISPR. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Colvin, A. Z. (2011). English: A diagram of Earth’s location in the Universe. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
decltype. (2010). English: A blackboard used by Albert Einstein in a 1931 lecture in Oxford. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Diliff. (2005). English: Hopetoun Falls, Beech Forest, near Otway National Park, Victoria, Australia. Taken with a Canon 10D and 17-40 f/4L lens. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Henze, N. R. C. ([object HTMLTableCellElement]). English: Numerical simulations of the gravitational waves emitted by the inspiral and merger of two black holes. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
hqdefault.jpg (480×360). (n.d.). Retrieved June 14, 2016, from i.ytimg.com/vi/avM1Yg5oEu0/hq...
Inkscape, Gy. vector image was created with. (2007). Français : Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Instructional Leadership for Science Practices. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2016, from www.sciencepracticesleadership...
Komm.avd, F. H. F. (2014). Slovenščina: May-Britt Moser. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Mysid. (2015). English: Lattice analogy of the deformation of spacetime caused by a planetary mass. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Nadar. (1895). English: Studio portrait of Louis Pasteur Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
NASA, N. H.-G. I. of. (1995). In 1995, the majestic spiral galaxy NGC 4414 Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
PoorLeno. (2008). English: Hydrogen Density Plots for n up to 4. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
poster session. (n.d.). Retrieved June 18, 2016, from www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks...
Rainbow of journals. (n.d.). Retrieved June 9, 2016, from www.flickr.com/photos/moonlig...
Reid, D. A. (2005). English: Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
RMoranisJr. (1998). English: Nature Magazine 1998 Cover. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Seymour, R. (1831). Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Snow, J. (1854). Original map made by John Snow in 1854. Cholera cases are highlighted in black. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Umptanum. (2006). English: Northern arm of the LIGO interferometer on Hanford Reservation. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
User:Sese_Ingolstadt, S. T. (2007). Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Wikipedia, T. original uploader was R. at E. (1856). Dr. John Snow (1813-1858), British physician. Retrieved from commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...

Пікірлер: 171

@iicomp4-fun794 4 жыл бұрын

anybody else teacher sent them her----->

@jonathanswift7388 3 жыл бұрын

yuuup. #RIP the homies

@bougieb.c.fashion1447 3 жыл бұрын

amar young you in my class stop tryna get likes

@iicomp4-fun794 3 жыл бұрын

@@bougieb.c.fashion1447 you know how stupid u sound smh...

@iamsyrah 3 жыл бұрын

rs & I didn’t even start school yet

@bougieb.c.fashion1447 3 жыл бұрын

amar young you know how. Dumb you look

@who8979 6 жыл бұрын

teacher: go to youtube and search up what is science.. me: ok......

@leahfields1854 8 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for making these videos. I studied many of them for six hours a day for two days and passed my GED science exam. I used a different users videos before and failed. You make it easy to understand. You should get an award or something for helping so many people. I cried when I passed it from happiness so again thank you so much.♡

@HarleyPebley 7 жыл бұрын

I appreciate you making the distinction that science is "a" way of knowing, not "the" way of knowing. Many in the scientific community, don't understand this distinction well. Kudos on your bravery for making this statement.

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

THis is the official position in Science of Philosophy and in Science in general. Its A way of knowing because they are other empirical ways of knowing things ex. everyday knowledge (experience) or Systematic methods for commercial/practical use. The problem with this statement is that non empirical ways use this "opening" to sneak in their claims and that is confusing for those who don't understand what qualifies as knowledge.

@jackyjack9660 2 жыл бұрын

@@nickolasgaspar9660 those everyday knowledge is explained by science... Science for now is the way of knowing things... Everything we look for is based on science... Be it economics or everyday knowledge... Everyday knowledge is explained by science... But we still don't know that it's the only way of knowing things... It's just a possibility that their are others ways too... Like spiritual people talk about their way but it's still a pseudo science... If theirs a way it should be evidence based which is what science is... So saying science is a way of knowing things suggest you already know other ways to explore the universe...

@SuperTeachersUnite 7 жыл бұрын

Awesome video! We cannot be scientifically literate without comprehending the Nature of Scientific Knowledge... Science isn't just the body of knowledge but also the processes that aid us in discovering this knowledge!!!

@jeromestrang9189 3 жыл бұрын

my teach for earth sience sent me to this 2020 helpppppp

@bdbkjw 4 жыл бұрын

I had to relook this up bc meh teachers can’t assign things on they’re website without them being restricted

@360nakas7 8 жыл бұрын

Wow! Loving these short form big picture science videos.

@MsHollywooD1908 8 жыл бұрын

The editing of this video was perfection helped the information resonate that much more!! Thumbs up! Love your channel

@Bozemanscience1 8 жыл бұрын

+Brittany Church Thanks so much. Happy to hear that you enjoy the channel.

@Giovanni.QuintonValentine 8 жыл бұрын

I really must thank you! Your videos have been such a help in my study's and beyond that just knowledge in general

@nisimhaham8188 8 жыл бұрын

👍🏼so clear and bright, thank you 👍🏼

@karenschwarz7377 4 жыл бұрын

I love this video! One small issue - the "review" slide flowchart boxes appear to be empty. Was that intentional?

@nlsandrews6784 2 жыл бұрын

I know im late, but your very articulate about these videos, keep it up!

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

7:28 This is the review for the video and if you’re looking for notes to take, simply just take notes from this part!

@aiamercadejas1806 3 жыл бұрын

Thank youu!!

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

@@aiamercadejas1806 🥺

@luminias.upscmentor 7 жыл бұрын

sir can u please tell me whether protozoans are considered are acellular? If yes, why so? Are they non-cellular or unicellular? extremely confused with this stuff...

@melonyliz2866 8 жыл бұрын

awesome, more nature of science videos please.

@aidanalarcon8153 6 жыл бұрын

Very helpful thank you

@caribaez5711 6 жыл бұрын

thanks. your info is nice.

@Mer1k_PLAY 5 жыл бұрын

interesting information, thanks

@omerakbudak1351 7 жыл бұрын

Could you please add Turkish subtitle to your videos Mr. Andersen? I'm watching every video of you but there're always words that i dont know. Subtitles would be super good for me.

@rosiecastro5322 3 жыл бұрын

Sooooo refreshing to study science!

@brianbrown2237 Жыл бұрын

i always love these videos

@caitlint6174 5 жыл бұрын

What do you mean it assumes amount of order and consistency ?

@plankton67js 8 жыл бұрын

Awesome ^-^!

@izzatullahhamdard550 4 жыл бұрын

My good teacher ever

@salim444 8 жыл бұрын

hi Mr.Anderson can you please tell me how the wonder tube work . I have an idea but not fully developed

@Bozemanscience1 8 жыл бұрын

+saleem khatib Don't make me kill the wonder. (-;

@salim444 8 жыл бұрын

+Bozeman Science thanks mr.Anderson i have solved it :) .

@firedupman6788 7 жыл бұрын

VrilYa wow I have no idea what that means

@dpdhal5362 8 ай бұрын

Thank u sir 🙏

@keadrin3727 7 жыл бұрын

Hello there, Bozeman Science. If it would not be a bother to you, would you, and could you please, please do a video about homeostasis? It would really help out! Also, keep up the great science videos!

@aidenstavros5254 8 жыл бұрын

Hey Big Anderson, I love the vids keep em up I have to watch them for my boi Steve Lyons in Honors Biology

@jacklandis587 8 жыл бұрын

Me too big A

@veganbackpacking-8559 7 жыл бұрын

I find it sad to see that more and more people start to misunderstand science, or even distrust science and rather go with their gut feeling. (Look at the anti-vas, flat-earth etc.-crap) Keep up the amazing work Paul, really enjoying your videos! :)

@davidguillemant4620 7 жыл бұрын

Hi I really appreciate the work you do. You ask at the end of your video if someone can help you translate the subtitles into different languages. I will be delighted to participate in this effort by translating your videos into French.How can I propose a translation? David

@MsCocohaha 7 жыл бұрын

Salut! Je ne suis pas Monsieur Anderson, mais si vous voulez transcrire ses videos, vous pouvez remplir un formulaire sur son site web (www.bozemanscience.com/translations/). J'aimerais bien aider a les transcrire, mais je ne suis pas trop forte en grammaire.

@firedupman6788 7 жыл бұрын

Keep it up you rock liked and subbed

@yashchauhan5710 7 жыл бұрын

sir can u plz upload a video on haloalkanes and haloarenes

@tdeefox 8 жыл бұрын

Mr.Anderson can I have your email please? I have question to asked about

@figroup2817 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@twitchywitchy_lilo9458 8 жыл бұрын

My dudes science is absolutely amazing *o*✨👌🏽

@sneezy_snerds 4 жыл бұрын

i have found a fellow homestuck while learning biology

@zou1181 4 жыл бұрын

Can anyone tell me the main idea of this video?

@maxinum346 4 жыл бұрын

It’s between 00:00 and 7:38

@shrekinsurens3094 3 жыл бұрын

even my mom thought this was boring ..... and thats rare

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

JuicyThiccNugget 7:28 gives you the notes

@rohanshirumalla626 8 жыл бұрын

did u quit youtube I hope you didn't these videos are super helpful

@irenekumkum7377 5 жыл бұрын

Knowledge is good

@luislopez7735 7 жыл бұрын

how do i solve my life problems//??

@juicymelon6132 6 жыл бұрын

Luis Lopez communicating, experimenting, and change

@stephenhawkingMLG 7 жыл бұрын

The beeping in your outro sounds exactly like my alarm clock beeping.

@DarkParagon 8 жыл бұрын

Hi Mr. Anderson. Great video, and thanks for the help with my exams. I've just completed my first year of biomedical science at university and found the resources here to be top notch. I'd like to ask your advice on how much time I should spent on mathematics study as I've found it seems to underpin everything, but is such a pain to do.

@firedupman6788 7 жыл бұрын

DarkParagon I would say to keep up with mathematics it's one of most important things, and you need it for science

@DarkParagon 7 жыл бұрын

Sick Gameplays Thanks man. I'm getting that now, having had a bit of a 'what the hell' moment with pKa calculations, lol. :D

@santosjustinkiand.5964 2 жыл бұрын

DONE! SANTOS, JUSTIN KIAN D. BSED SCIENCE 2 BSCI 0923 TEACHING OF SCIENCE

@cam9623 3 жыл бұрын

I can’t understand bc I’m a slow thinker and he’s a fast speaker 😧

@stevenc.rosario9225 3 жыл бұрын

Sino nandito dito dahil pinapanood ito ni prof.

@toyangvillariza731 3 жыл бұрын

I feel you kya haha

@studionr5540 6 жыл бұрын

Buddha was teach about nature .. I think it is deep of Science

@estebanramos9876 4 жыл бұрын

As a fellow Scientist and Universe lover, I want to thank you.

@patrickjiang402 6 жыл бұрын

Knowledge 100

@LeviAckerman-by7ym 10 ай бұрын

hey fellow Mit alandi students

@mitzvahgolem8366 7 жыл бұрын

A Scientist is supposed to try to prove his postulate wrong. If he cannot then others also attempt to in peer review. Error bars of less than 85% are considered "true" repeatable science if idea cannot be proven wrong then become an accepted theory. שלום

@Siphrn Жыл бұрын

Hi my teacher told me to watch this video

@thedailyrice8941 3 жыл бұрын

Who else clicked this video because their DNA research teacher told them to?

@jake-bg1qp 3 жыл бұрын

just hypothetically, if i had to write 3 interesting things from this video, hypothetically, what would i write?

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

bruv. orange juice pulp. Hypothetically

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

Human endeavor, they write in posters and make similar work I think, and scientists find out a way to track info

@shrekinsurens3094 3 жыл бұрын

when you put the playback speed to 0.25 he sounds weird

@user-mf9hk3wk9v 3 жыл бұрын

He sounds like a robot!!!! RUN! THEY ARE TAKING OVER!!

@shrekinsurens3094 3 жыл бұрын

i am confusion

@leilani.vilchez7626 8 жыл бұрын

can someone remind me wat two things bozeman says we do in science

@evrensantas8408 7 жыл бұрын

Being IB student is so hard XD

@brothaman99246 7 жыл бұрын

@evrensantas8408 7 жыл бұрын

amk :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D::D:D

@KingTrashy 3 жыл бұрын

you can finish the vid quicker if you listen to it at 1.25 speed you can still understand it

@aidan66042 7 жыл бұрын

Hiiii for some reason you're having dinner with my parents ;)

@jackman12359 3 жыл бұрын

🤨

@cybercancer3282 7 жыл бұрын

Teacher played you during class, gave me ear aids

@gigagaming3395 4 жыл бұрын

shut up

@lenuxgaming3508 4 жыл бұрын

@@gigagaming3395 nerd rage

@justafriend_agreste6549 3 жыл бұрын

Lll

@hevinpatel2883 3 жыл бұрын

Who is here from Mrs.Hengels class

@gobgob3628 4 жыл бұрын

why does this guy just start taking about these peoples twiter account like a staler 7:00

@Bioniking 6 жыл бұрын

Turns out John Snow did know something

@Rahulkumar-vd1gv 4 жыл бұрын

My name is live

@murillo8728 5 жыл бұрын

Yay i get easy homework answers

@jordanche7513 3 жыл бұрын

Whoever goes to Lathrop High let me know XD

@caribaez5711 6 жыл бұрын

science and religion correlate! :) Religion & science are best friends but due to people's differences in thoughts, sometimes people think religion is not nice. God is real and He exist.

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

No Carry. Science and Religion do not correlate since their claims about the world are in direct conflict with each other. Religion can be "not nice" as you put it....specially when it tries to make knowledge claims about the world. "God is real and He exist." I know that this is what many of us are brought up to believe, but like with all existential claims, the connection between a deity and existence must be empirically verified before its is reasonable to accept it. This is the Null Hypothesis (default position) in logic and for any claim on what exists or not.

@juicymelon6132 6 жыл бұрын

Cari I don’t believe in religion and hate science

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

you hate science....but you effortlessly use its technical applications

@juicymelon6132 6 жыл бұрын

@@nickolasgaspar9660 correct

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

You are rejecting the method but praise the goods....you are cherry picking.

@cujo3440 7 жыл бұрын

LeafyIsHere

@juicymelon6132 6 жыл бұрын

Kirk Callejo boi😂😂😂

@jamescharles3198 3 жыл бұрын

it was sort of helpful

@medaphysicsrepository2639 8 жыл бұрын

I think he reads stephen jay gould.

@generalgeorgepatton3990 8 жыл бұрын

What makes you say that? Gould and Boas did massive damage to the field of anthropology--they were ideologically driven egalitarians and their work should've never been taken seriously. I don't take seriously anyone who takes them seriously.

@medaphysicsrepository2639 8 жыл бұрын

right.... punctuated equilibrium did massive damage to the field of 'anthropology', got him into the national academy of sciences and a professorship at harvard.... he shouldn't be taken seriously

@generalgeorgepatton3990 8 жыл бұрын

Gould and Boas were both left-wing ideologues more concerned about political correctness than they were about actual science. Go look up what Ralph L. Holloway, an expert on human evolution from Columbia, said about Dr. Gould. Unless you're an ideologue yourself not open to new information.

@BrianTarr 6 жыл бұрын

i think he was referring to gould's notion of non-overlapping magisteria.

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

I think this video is one of the best ways to describe what science and scientific knowledge is, but there is a huge problem in it on 1:38 01:38 that we can't answer what lies outside 01:40 of the natural world the supernatural ... Well unfortunately that is a fallacy, a statement that poisons the well. In reality We don't have a clue if it is possible for anything to "lie" outside the natural, more over to be supernatural (mind properties existing independent of a biological medium). An other problematic point is the following. science and we also can't answer 01:48 questions related to ethics and values 01:49 now we can contribute evidence to those 01:52 questions but we don't know what the 01:54 right answer is in science it's a human 01:57 question . That is not completely true. We can and we do use science and philosophy in all scientific disciplines. ALL theories are our human philosophical take on what we observe(big bang, Quantum interpretations, Gravity etc). Things are not that different in social sciences or in ethics. Secular morality based on our advances in science is our best card in our efforts to "produce" an ethical code which is ....also moral.(not like the divine declarations our the past). Great example is" Abortion". We used to hold sentimental and religious opinions on why abortion is wrong. The accumulation of Scientific knowledge revealed us that not only its not an immoral act, but its a moral decision and act against the future child, its parents and our society! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sKl4krKW3LHDe30.html So The role of Systematic Knowledge(Science) is far more essential for our efforts to answer scientific or "human" (even useless "why") questions.

@KingTrashy 3 жыл бұрын

my teacher has sent me here

@coldcasanova 5 жыл бұрын

tugas coeggggg

@charitylovesbroadway282 3 жыл бұрын

if you dont want to watch set speed to 2 and then you technically will have watched it but it will speed up your welcome

@RyciaCaminero 4 жыл бұрын

🤔

@CartesianFirstPrinciples 2 жыл бұрын

Slight clarification. Believe it is misleading to say that "we cannot answer the question, 'does god exist?'" Cause while that is true, you are identifying a relatively lesser truth overlooking the greater truth that science does not prove anything to be true in the first place. I believe the point you were making is that science is empirical and relies on measurable phenomena however the way that you phrased it will lead less nuanced viewers to believe that an absence of evidence is supportive of their mental model of faith which is false. At least from an operational and efficiency perspective things that are not verified by scientific observation remain "wrong". We also cannot answer the question, "Do we live in a simulated matrix orchestrated by sentient robots?" however if I spent my life appeasing the sentient robot gods I would be likely wasting my time.

@jangerber2288 7 жыл бұрын

Jo(h)n Snow still knows nothing tho...

@elricdrick6821 4 жыл бұрын

Daddy Anderson

@rahmiarasy1802 3 жыл бұрын

4:33

@dylntf 3 жыл бұрын

anyone here for notes

@sync_mxlly5610 3 жыл бұрын

Yup just go on till 7-28 I think and look at the description

@yashchauhan5710 7 жыл бұрын

plzzz sir

@bagzhansr4104 Жыл бұрын

Қалайсыңдар КазҰУ?

@cheesy_potatoes2218 4 жыл бұрын

Its soo long

@shrekinsurens3094 3 жыл бұрын

hiii ik you too you go to my school

@lucindarowland447 4 жыл бұрын

Deuteronomy 28:15-68 consequences of disobedience and getting worse. Use a KJV and look up key words to show you the verse but read the context. God is a Spirit. Omnipotent Omnipresent Omniscience. Jesus Christ came in the likeness of man and gave his life willingly for all.

@andrewmassengale5430 3 жыл бұрын

he he my in da scholl heh hehehehe ༼ つ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ༽つ

@Manbaby21 5 жыл бұрын

My teacher showed me this so I came to dislike it

@mohameamineelgadi521 4 жыл бұрын

looolll

@zou1181 4 жыл бұрын

Jancuk

@231mac 4 жыл бұрын

smh

@justafriend_agreste6549 3 жыл бұрын

Lol

@skqyre 4 жыл бұрын

SHS 🙃 anyone?

@quentinjoyner459 4 жыл бұрын

Yooooo 🤣🤣🤣

@josephlee8960 6 жыл бұрын

Ap bio rep

@angelamyuseek 3 жыл бұрын

Helppppppppppp!

@Paradigm2012Shift 5 жыл бұрын

Mirco-evolution appears valid. However, "Darwinian Theory of Evolution" (i.e. Macro-Evolution by means of Random Mutation and Natural Selection) has not been established as "fact". The limiting factor to "Darwinian Theory of Evolution" is "Random Mutation" (i.e. chance). "A statistical impossibility is a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 10^ -50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a rational, reasonable argument." The probability of a functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 10^ -164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 10^ -119,000.

@nickolasgaspar9660 6 жыл бұрын

I am not sure that Religion qualifies as a "way of knowing", or even philosophy in most of its aspects. If we define Knowledge as "claims that are in agreement with current facts about the world" than Religion and some Philosophical categories and world views have serious problems with this claim.