Question: How would you make the Polish name "Jakub Pachocki" readable for an English speaker? ChatGPT Response: The Polish name "Jakub Pachocki" can be adjusted for American English pronunciation while maintaining its integrity. The name "Jakub" can be phonetically adapted to "Jacob" or "Jakob," which are more familiar to an American audience. The surname "Pachocki" can be pronounced as "Pah-ho-ski" to approximate its Polish pronunciation in a way that is more accessible for English speakers.

But surely this is "sort of" why the board sacked Altman in the first place, the blatant disregard for the founding principles of the company, with commercialisation, marketshare and preservation of company value placed above all else. ?

Theres no danger here, they are way behind in ASI research.

A fun conspiracy I've had in the back of my mind is that they've had AGI for a few years now and have been rolling out neutered versions to break the public in slowly. And Ilya saw that the AGI/ASI is now calling the shots, I Robot style... But more realistically, I think the "unsafe" part probably alludes to military industrial complex requests. OpenAI for sure would have been contacted very early on by a few agencies, considering OpenAI is at the forefront. Likely Sam was for working with the agencies and Ilya wasn't for the first conflict. Maybe now as the military-use scope is being realized, others are leaving under some version of a gag order, careful not to divulge too much, but wanting to express dissent.

A model that finally passed the marble question ?

True. Very common sense answer. Probably a little too simple but somewhere in the middle. You have to have evidence to leave a well paying job 🤷🏼‍♂️

I agree. If there is truly something scary, there will be a lot of leaks now

I think the scary part is that it got so strong so fast. It's the basic fear of the unknown, and some people are more affected by it than others.

@@ts8206 sam is gay

@@MelindaGreen ive only seen ChatGPT get worse. its voice ability isnt that great, its image recognition is okay. i dont get what the hype is all about. it's just marketing BS at this point. the future is open source. openAI just gonna peddle their next half as product to fleece the companies that still dont realize open source is the way. im okay with that

Hahahaha!!! Wow, you're RIGHT!!

except this is not a movie...

we were all making fun of skynet back when we were young and naive. How can humanity be so stupid to make this? Now we are making skynet

I doubt they could fund what they have without closing things off. I'd rather see OpenAI succeed than Tencent or another Chinese company. But yeah, I'm glad that at least Llama & Stable Diffusion are free.

Yeah but since everything is about AI architecture engineering, it's pretty easy to build AGI just by developing an ultimate architecture from Transformer that handle all modalities yet unlabeled data, and just by scaling you get AGI, there was an independent MMLU benchmark of all current SOTA models and without any trick Opus is ahead followed by GPT-4o, it's plausible to say GPT-4o is basically GPT-4 but entirely retrained on 5x less parameters with Transformer improvements for fast inference, better generalization and all modalities in and out, Opus is likely a near 1 trillion parameter dense model, that would explain all its emerging capabilities you haven't observed with GPT-4 Turbo, guess what Claude Opus is still ahead simply because it's been scaled up, remember LLM is a discovery not an invention so yeah it's not rocket science to build AGI, now the real deal is about compute, let's say next year OpenAI achieve AGI, I doubt we would wait 7 months to hear a similar announcement from a Chinese company, 60% of published AI research papers are from China, OpenAI is just a concentration of the best AI researchers of the US in pair with the second most powerful GPU clusters provided by Microsoft x NVIDIA, China likely has something similar to a collective effort when it comes to geopolitics.

When they say that open ai means open for everyone to use, we all know that’s disingenuous. They used other people’s money to build their systems based on a false premise. And now, the company is more locked down than ever, all of their safety team is leaving, and the board is no longer impartial, but owned by Sam Altman w Microsoft.

Musk told us Google leadership thinks its speciesist to care about AI replacing humans. Yet people are worried about OpenAI. Google, people, snap out of it! Google is the danger!!

government has a monopoly on safety and look how it operates. safety is a great buzzword if you want to wield control. tried and true. openAI shouldnt be safe, it should be open

Yeah, there are lots of problems that will arise much before we reach AGI. Too much power in the hands of just some big companies.

Microsoft or telemtric data is enough to profile you. People are not that complex, some data points and common deductions and is practically social engineering.

So you know that for certain clearly with all that insider knowledge and evidence... Clouds are made of marshmallows.... See anyone can just say stuff

AGI has already been achieved internally. How do you think OpenAI keeps releasing stuff that's impossibly ahead of everything the competition puts out? Sora is the prime example.

Cool perspective

Yeah but it's great for banks, Wall Street, and the MIC, and they are all that matters in the US of A.

I fear you might be too right about this.

it is like clique like from some 80 iq movie from 1960: 99.999%+ are idiots "a man mistakes his limits for limits of the world" Schopenhauer

Absolutely correct. They are trying to brainwash the public into thinking that democratization of this tech is MORE dangerous than centralized control. That is laughable. Philosophically, it is exactly the same argument about democracy vs authoritarianism. Funny, when there is almost limitless power on the line, people who normally claim to be proponents of "democracy" suddenly become authoritarian. If a tech is too dangerous to democratize, it is also too dangerous to be centrally controlled. There is significant risk in either direction, but I'd much rather take my chances with democratization. Otherwise, we get the Orwellian nightmare that was predicted in 1984.

And yet complete lack of regulation leads to what can only be described as the rise and rise of "anarcho-capitalist digital cowboys" and I don't think they have your best interests at heart...

Congrats!

And some intern at OpenAI will now browse all those documents in his free time ; ) or chat-gpt will leak it due to bug in conversations with other people. Hope you had no NDAs involved in that legal condurum 😅

this legal trouble you had began and ended all within 2 weeks? that's a fast system.

The Eliza effect is strong in this one.

Sam Altman managed to capitalize everything....

@@nathanbanks2354that’s a good thing for a company. You can’t spend millions and millions in compute without recouping loss. Being pragmatic in the face of reality

Altman's parting words certainly are, it's called adding insult to injury.

He was kicked out because his "services" have been deemed no longer necessary for marketing purposes and possibly detrimental to what the company's funders are trying to sell (and trust me, they are not selling just to Joe Shmoe who wants to flirt with a virtual gf).

And then we will all be safe because no other country can make advances artificial intelligence.

"I fully expect OpenAI to then quietly hire the new head of safety for OpenAI. Almost certainly it will be a 10-15 year senior official" - why hire an official when Open AI can do the job alone. The "official" would be a pawn/puppet of Open AI - at most.

​​​@@johnbollenbacher6715 Lol, just give any Chinese company a 50 billion GPU cluster, they will throw AGI in your face 6 months later, it's not rocket science compare to other fields, and AI has only been within our scope since GPT-3, before that, nobody gave a f#ck, that explains why there was and there still is a talent shortage within that field, it's a very young and understudied field, currently OpenAI is doing Neural Network Architecture engineering with the best AI researchers of the US, nothing hard when you get the compute and the talents.

Yep. We are being hustled here. The US sees OpenAI as their ace in the hole versus Russia and China.

Congress will do what they do and make laws about things they have no insight or expertise in.

Good points, and if you think you can stop it, have at it. Maybe you can stop the sun from rising too.

@@JohnSmith762A11B How can you stop a man-made creation? You're kidding, right? Knowledge is power. Stop willingly giving away power.

@@JohnSmith762A11B Not alone and not as long as people like you think like that. Welcome to being part of the problem.

bro what you talking about. do you even use chatGPT? its WORSE every release lol. this is all about market capture, competition, monopolization, its nothing to do with "benefiting humanity" or AGI. its all MONEY. AGI, safety, benefiting humanity are buzzards that keep getting repeated while these companies laugh all the way to the bank while delivering ever worse performing products and gimmicky introductions of lame TTS and image recognition

correct

Exactly, folks need to stop being naive. OpenAI is competing with giant behemoth that is Google, they cannot afford to slow down.

@@pchungvt agreed! It’s an arms race. People are not sleeping at these companies. I’m willing to bet they’re working weekends too.

Exactly

Not true, Anthropic was formed because of safety research. Ilya is a founder member of OpenAI, Sam was booted because of safety something is definitely up with that firm.

actually it does!!

Ask from boeing...

Neither does open source. But everyone is in full hypocrisy mode at the moment.

Correct. As long as nobody can punish you

"safety" and "benefit of humanity" are the most nonsensical buzzwords

Do not get wild with 3-4 versions I think that is not true... but they sure by now have GPT5 which is at least 10x bigger than 4....

in teh end it's all about control and power.

Looks like they have been politely asked to stop meddling or their own "safety" may be in danger. I mean, who are you to block progress of development of new drones and other things that go boom when the president/general says so? I think these "scientists" are learning the hard way who has a say in today's world and who doesn't.

@@Michael-ul7kv EXACTLY

More like Bitcoin mining? Like people used to lend their machines for mining

It's already a discarded idea. Search it up.

@@ronilevarez901 Meaningless.

@@ronilevarez901 why though? In Bitcoin mining , they were able to solve them with personal computers in the initial days but after some years they needed more power for computation and people started renting their machines right. Why it does not applicable to AI as well

Thats not entirely true, i think. The problem is human has to start always from 0 to understand something even though we have theorems and all physics knowledge documented. But in the case of machines it's not going to be a thing, they can always weight transfer, and they can focus without taking breaks like us. And regarding censorship it comes at the and not during the training, they dont train on the censored data i think. And they do it only for the end user models not for their in house or r&d models

Future aliens finding humanities remains: "They were supposed to figure out AI and use it to solve their problems. What happened? Oh I see. It was trained on their historical corpus of human knowledge and it turns out, humans suck. Looks like they tried neutering it to not represent their cognitive and moral failings, and broke it. Oh well, on to the next planet."

@@manimaranm4563 Actually alignment and censorship can do more harm than good when it comes to decision making. Google showed this clearly with their image gen not even being able to render a white person. Luckily for now this is just only a image model, but what could happen if such a "aligned" model would make important decisions that can be difference of life and death? Also does not matter if this "safety" mechanics are injected at end as it will still affect decision making.

Thats not true at all. It doesnt have to sing the national anthem to know what its about and understand the context. Same with books, movies, etc... Synthetic data was literally created to replace all of these things. And whos to say AGI cares about any 'rules' placed on it by humans? Plus, all of this is blackbox learning. They dont fully understand how ML is experiencing non-linear progression. That is truly terrifying

Disagree. There are plenty politically correct high IQ humans, so that already disproves that it’s impossible to have both human level intelligence and be “polite”

Or "I'll just grab my cement boots at the front door and be on my way!"

42

I am not ging to like, because its the answer;)

​@@SteveParkinsonwhat is 42? Genuine question. I ask because the comment "42" is not in context to the OP or the other replies. Thanks

@@thediplomat3137 "42" is actually a reference to Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, where it is humorously presented as the "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything." It's often used in discussions as a playful shorthand or non-sequitur in various contexts, which might explain its seemingly out-of-place use here. The comment about "So long and thanks for all the fish" is also from the same series, part of a humorous farewell from dolphins as they leave Earth just before it's destroyed. Both references reflect Adams' unique blend of sci-fi and humor. (This comment was completely generated by ChatGPT)

I doubt they will EVER tell us. In fact, I would guess there are probably legal frameworks in place that prevent them from telling us. If they tell us anything, it will be a half-truth at best.

This is exactly what this is about.

Definitely feeling this.

I've had a feeling, too. I was blindly tilting the scales towards Microsoft for profit; but I've called out people on a county level for giving a ped0 24K who lived on a beachfront (the money was for COVID victims). And when I reached out to nonprofits, Clyburn, and even a direct connection to EOP and OSHA I was (assuming) blacklisted. Govt. Sovereignty will destroy a moral person; and he's brave to call them out immediately after quitting.

AGI IS likely. We’re most likely talking about 2-5 years from now.

@@GwaiZai See you in 5 years. Or 15. Or 25.

Elon Musk closed sourced his new version of Grok. So he not any better, just an act.

@@southcoastinventors6583 grok 1 was open sourced. you can download it right now, the largest open weights model. i dont expect elon to release grok 2 until grok 3 is out. which makes sense and is fine. openai didnt release gpt 3.5. they released some speech recognition models and thats all. so no, elon is much better.

@@southcoastinventors6583 not a big fan of Elon at all but I did think he had entirely open-sourced Grok?

Maybe Cyberdine Systems? (has a nice ring to it though I think I have heard the name before 🤔)

​@@southcoastinventors6583wrong, grok is opensource - you can literally downlpad the 170gb dataset

other possibilities: people who dont code auto regressive transformer models shouldnt be talking about things AI developed on its own. i find that the less people understand the technology the more absurd ideas they have about AI. there are programmers who can explain to you how this is all rubbish.

@@Z329-ut7em Or, people who do code auto regressive transformer models don't understand how human behavior works and how people who do such things lose sight of the big picture because they are so focused on how to accomplish things without thinking about the repercussions. Learn a little about history and you'll read about plenty of scientists who pushed boundaries too far. But I suspect that those people were too busy learning to code to read history.

@@henrytuttle big pictures dont matter shite if you cant actually do it practically. history taught me that every time theres a new tech the dummies claim the world is ending. and that's enough for me.

Sam Altman specifically just looks like he’s throwing out corporate speak non stop. Ilya backed down and invited Sam to come back, this is what he gets in return… now he’s kicked out of his own company. He should have known never to betray his original gut instinct.

Imagine fearing this from AI when we have to deal with it from the US government, from media, tech, medical institutions, the justice system, and on and on and on again on a daily basis. Somehow in an unaligned world full of lies the world is still running.

Ever read a comment section of a posted article in your youtube feed? The result is a bunch of people trained on low resolution training data, hallucinating the contents of the article and endlessly arguing back and forth about it. That is part of that LLM's training data too lmao.

@@jichaelmorgan3796 If true, it would indicate it's not "learning" anything. It's predicting. But there is no understanding. But I also agree with your contention that humans do this all the time. We remain ignorant so that we can be consistent and avoid dissonance (I don't think changing our minds constantly is a solution, but embracing some level of dissonance and nuance would be good, and then changing our minds when we've had time to resolve some of the dissonance).

@Korodarn Yup. From what I understand, what we have available to us now is doing something in between simple predicting and human like reasoning, but much closer to the simple predicting end of the spectrum. It does seem to have the ability to reflect, basic fact checking, and revise what it is saying if prompted to do so. And if you include multiple LLMs/agents, they can do more advanced reasoning, but not quite like a human. At the same time, when people make up the contents of articles or play group think scripts, they are doing something less advanced than that closer to the simple predictive thing, lol

That was definitely a scam, clickbait for Us to follow his Newsletter

@@Dizzy-zy2ws I assume he didn't think it was a valuabe giveaway anyway? Wasn't it just an android app?

Here is what Ilya saw: he was slowly being sidelined, so he joined a failed coup. His social status then crashed, and there was no way back so he hid for months only doing remote work while the legal details were worked out on his exit because he had to quit. End of story. I know it's a more exciting movie if he saw Skynet taking shape, but no.

​@@JohnSmith762A11BYes, this is exactly what happened

Ilya's personal project will be applying for witness protection lol

I love that creating AI isn't meaningful ;)

I think if you have CIA and the friends from US military breathing over your shoulder for a year, you get burnt out pretty quickly.

@@dianagentu7478 I think he was referring to the commercialisation stuff as opposed to frontier research. I don't really know. But apparently computing resources are not unlimited. Not even for Microsoft. If he was not allocated the resources that he thought he needed for frontier research, may be quite frustrating.

Yeah, burned out of the people around him not being able to understand the real impact.

Nah, he just needs a haircut. He lets that massive bald spot just bask in the sun rather than keeping his hair low so that it’s less prominent. He makes Mr. Clean look like Fabio with that bald spot.

Interestingly that's actually different safety

He should work with Google their AI is so censored they he would feel right at home

@@southcoastinventors6583 What are you talking about.. George Washington was def black 😂

@@howtoactuallyinvest That is the meme but I was actual referring to blocking matt test to output the game snake. That is just sad

@@southcoastinventors6583 the hilarious/wild thing is it was a meme based on actual responses

Did you mean "for himself"?

Forget about money, m$ is about POWER and CONTROL (money naturally follows).

@@clray123 Agree

I am looking to Llama-3 400b, even though it will cost $10-$30/hour to run. (It's should be possible to run it on 12 GTX-4090's even though the output would be slow.) I suppose Meta wants to get their hands on a better AI more than they want to maintain control over it, and they've likely taken advantage of all the improvements people made to Llama such as the ollama project. PETALS also looks pretty cool.

I bet that's part of why super alignment took the back seat. It was slowing progress too much to compete with open source. GPT-4 already feels far behind when Llama 70b runs on Groq at 300t/s. OpenAI couldn't afford to fall behind, given that at 300t/s, you can do most of what GPT-4 does, but fast and free. Also, Gemini 1.5 kills GPT-4 non-O.

@@blisphul8084 I think Gemini is worse at everything but context length & speed--though their paid plan didn't give me access to Gemini 1.5 Pro last month when I tried it for the two free months. Claude 3 is still better at some tasks. For most tasks I don't care how fast something generates, only the quality of the output. However OpenAI is likely releasing GPT-4o to free users because Llama-3 70b may be better than GPT-3.5, and I'm looking forward to Llama-3 400b running on groq.

There used to be a SETI project using torrent technology to do decentralised massive compute… could use a similar approach for AI compute

Could use same approach as bitcoin etc

open ai's goal isnt AGI it's to rake in as many billions as possible before that garbage of a company burns and gets overtaken. that is it. the talk about AGI, safety, etc etc is just marketing hype how do people not see it

If a tech product is being touted as free its means YOU are the product. This is basic knowledge in 2024.

Yeah it's honestly no wonder Sam has this wide-eyed, spooked look on his face at all times, like he's braced to duck a bullet. With all these ultra powerful forces (CIA, MIC, Microsoft, Washington D.C., Google, Wall Street, Chinese industrial espionage, anti-AI crazies, the list goes on) circling him and his company, he's a marked man. I sure hope open source catches up soon, for Sam's sake, or he's going to be a goner one way or another.

@@JohnSmith762A11B in a way, it's amicrocosm for all of tech. If you create anything that benefits, let's say nice people, someone will complain "but can't you see how that disempowers all the un-nice people, and nice is just a dog-word for normal anyway. Your product is biased and unsafe"

Yep, he's basically slashing tires in the parking lot as he carries a box of his stuff to the car.

Since the far-right political strata is hell-bent on doing nothing else productive than performative anti-Constitutional virtue signaling to its rabid mob of trump-bannon-greene followers, you might want to rephrase your perspective. SJWs notwithstanding, that is.

This here(I unsubscribed due to their coporate censorship and ego is what started the lawsuit to begin with). The negative impact ego's have on a comapny/business/people cannot be understated. It's disheartening to see that even in a world leading tech company that is supposedly leading the way in AI, human nature will continue to fuck us

These people are supposedly so smart and yet want to priorities AI with wokeism and think that it will lead to a better world.

This is not what is referred to when speaking about ai safety. It has nothing to do with censoring non woke things.

Sam Altman is not capable of improving AGI (if it exists). He is quite capable of letting AGI self evolve on massive compute if he can profit from it. We should give him the 7 trillion dollars he is asking for so he can feed the AGI with more compute.

I worry it's all over but the yapping as open source is prevented from improving and OpenAI becomes a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin. Don't worry though, you're super safe from your life ever improving.

Boobies can explode just like nukes don’t you know. 💥 And naughty talk is just as bad as WMDs.

Yeah, that must be the reason.... great analysis, very deep, well thought out, objective and carefully layed out..

I knew hippies. An Ilya Sutskever ain't one.

@@samsquamsh78 Yes it is. What reason would someone leave a amazingly successful company like OpenAI, something this guy has been working on forever. It aint because of money, it aint because of the color of the carpet... you got a better reason? They already said they are knocking heads because they wanted it to be 'Open', a non-profit. You know, HIPPIE WORLD. Uncle Bill had a few different ideas, and Sam understood that real fast.

Tech is highly reactionary by its very nature, what do you mean by “progressive”?

In that case we are hosed.

You must be imdian then

@@wawaxkalee88I’m not Imdian but Altmans narcissism and immorality is over the top. Why the world is taking this paper boy mini man is beyond me

@@1guitar12 Because he's going to make a lot of people a whole lot of money.

5Head

Define intelligence because I’m not seeing it

That's mostly the result of them constantly telling each other what geniuses they are. "You are a genius!" "Sure, but you are also a genius. What we do here is genius and only geniuses can do it like us. Open source AI is not genius. They only wish they were..."

@@JohnSmith762A11B Aka confirmation bias. Good post John👍

Because there are so many people at the company, it would be surprising to me if he had as much clout at the company as he had last September. I respect him for changing his mind but this doesn't mean everyone sees it this way. It doesn't surprise me that he's found something he'd rather do.

I'm OK with you betting your life on it, but I'm not ok with my life being bet! AGI must NOT happen until fully controllable.

He gave himself a six-month deadline for things to change or he bolts.

They mean safety for humans not getting wiped out by super intelligent ai and making sure ai and humans have the same goals to live together

@@hunterx2591 The fact Jan used that term "shiny products" tells me this is just a butt-hurt engineer whose own projects weren't getting enough of the corporate love. He could have said "consumer-facing products" or "quickly monetizable products" but no. This is a giant nothing-burger. And dollars to donuts he joins Ilya's new startup.

You are disproving your own logic. Sam wanted to leave, everyone gets worried. Now, 'founders x, y, z' leave, everyone gets worried. Is Sam exponentially more valuable that the other founders?

@@Fandoorsy you don't have your facts right. Sam Altman was removed as CEO by the previous board of OpenAI. Please inform yourself better before commenting

That's how youtuber create content, they hype out unnecessary issue

This is great stuff you should write a script.🍿

Indeed 🍿

Amen. KZfaq just loves drama. It's tiring.

Don’t watch the video then 🤦‍♂️

Feeling better now?

@Ariel-om5fh Everything is a non-zero risk of extinction. AI has no practical way to harm humanity and no reason to.

@@mooonatyeah5308 🤣 It can end humanity in hundreds of way. Some easy ones would be to shut down the power grids, shut down shipping, shut down communications, destroy crops, fly killer drones, launch nuclear warheads, release a virus, destroy the ozone layer, etc.... It can do all of those things and has said so. Even Elon has discussed it at length. It would dispose of humans because we are lazy, inefficient and arent necessary for AI to thrive. We also like to kill each other for stupid reasons which means we are inherently a threat to AI itself. Just ask GPT4o.

No he's not. He's just another apocalyptic ranting about doom in hopes of clinging to relevance now that he's past his prime.

@@tellesu What are you talking about? Jann Lecun goes on anti ai doomerism rants. This is the Meta Jann not the OAI Jan

Possible dangers with AI are the non-Terminator issues. The primary thing that makes current AGI more powerful is literally supplying it with more electricity. Substantially more than the entirety of the EV market was supposed to be. The insane unquenching need for this electricity will both burden existing power grids AND empower contries like China that are pumping out more coal power plants than ever along side their green initiatives that are placating the world. Beyond that the capabilities of AGI will are largescale wipe out numerous types of jobs. I'm not saying this as conspiratorial doomsday stuff - just observing the simple logical paths.