Brian Cox and Michio Kaku are the GOATs of explaining cosmology and physics. And Brian Cox is my personal favorite. 🐐

I hope I live as long as possible to see all the new discoveries scientists are going to make in the future.

❤❤❤❤I love it when professor Cox and his intellectual challenges ‘hurt’ my brain trying to absorb it all.

Thanks for the explanation 👍

Well said, thanks Brian

I’m not going to discredit the years worth of intelligent observation and calculations of our most renowned scientists but I have a theory. I’m positive it’s not a novel theory but one nonetheless. A singularity, at least to our understanding, means that it’s a region where space and time can’t exist. A hole in space-time. Any particulate matter that falls into the singularity either seizes to exist or is compressed into a point of infinite density. If this was true, an event horizon wouldn’t grow in size in proportion to the amount of matter enters the black hole. We already know that neutron stars have an incredibly powerful gravitational field, and they are able to distort light very heavily. Some estimates say that light will circle a neutron star many times before actually being free enough of the insane gravitational pull. What if a black hole is just this. There may just be a “measurable” surface beneath the event horizon. Like a neutron star, a black hole has a strong enough gravitational field that light cannot escape it. I think a black hole is just an insanely compressed region of matter that will grow depending on the amount of matter that falls onto it. As the region grows, so does the event horizon. A neutron star is the closest thing that we can observe to a black hole. It can generate accretion disks and polar jets just like black holes. They can devour entire stars like black holes.

We need to ask Darth Vador! he knows im sure of it!

I think the sad reality is we still do not fully understand gravity

When scientists come to the conclusion that whoever gave us knowledge also has limits our knowledge about the future holds & what’s happening with these galaxies, it’s then they’ll realize people we all just guessing this thing.

One thing I've learned in my lifetime, nothing is forever

Dark Energy is my mother in law. Dark Matter is my sister in law.

No. The reason we don't know is that there's no "singularity" in a black hole, or anywhere else in the universe.

I don't understand how black holes are not just pure plasma

I think it's like a funnel; If you enter it, you get stuck there. I don't think there's another side.

Interesting. Not shocking. Interesting.

Brian cox is an alien?

I wonder if dark matter is another state or condition: liquid, gas, x...(the waters above the heavens)

So explosions don't blast in all directions but in one or two directions.

That's not how black holes look light shins all around it all everyone shows is this it actually looks like a star

Perhaps if Dark matter doesn't interact with electromagnetic forces, it interacts with with electrorepulsion

The biggest mystery is why Brian Cox can't a better hair cut.

Brian Cox is eight feet tall.

Dark energy --> repulsive gravity 🤯

You’re welcome

Nothing we can imagine goes in or it would come out. Black holes are where fields end.

If the time shows down, can anything ever reach the singularity?

Most shocking mystery in the universe (other than universe itself) is us

Black holes turn everything inside out , wheres the out

QUESTION! If gravity is just the displacement of spacetime, how can a blackhole with far less mass create more gravity?!

I hear this voice over so often on so many different clips. Who is it?

If ours laws break down, are they really laws?

AI will figure it out in few seconds

could dark matter be related to the missing antimatter from the big bang?

😂😂😂 okay เพื่อน นายเดา ฉันใช่ไหม เกือบถูกนะ แต่ ก็ ต้องศึกษาชัดหน่อย

Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. This is illustrated in a common 2 axis dilation graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical. This shows it's squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason. Wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. According to Einstein's math, the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter), the missing mass is dilated mass. According to Einstein's math, there would be no dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass. To date, 5 very, very low mass galaxies have been confirmed to have normal star rotation rates, in other words they showed no signs of dark matter.

If the universe is expanding equally in all directions, where is our galaxy? Is it closer to one edge or the other? If distant galaxies are moving away from us, how do we reconcile the previous question?

Jst a dumb idea: Let jst compare Our Human body to the Universe... As like our body cells die before Us making their lifetime a fraction of our time, like so do WE before Universe... Explained:- The Universe is jst a small baby who is still growing, compared to da galaxies who r a bit adult (Old) in their life time period, followed by the Solar systems a bit more, then the Stars & planets collapse offently due to their age. Similarly, our human body which is jst a baby as compared to a RBCs lifetime (which is roughly 4months), then there goes the tissues dat live a bit longer, some organs that eventually collapse in our lifetime, then organ systems like clusters of galaxies also can be damaged during our lifetime. Still we have enough space to grow old. Our Human body is like a Universe & Again there is enough space to have more like Us. Conclusion:- This is the order of the Nature dat "There is always something more and it's infinite".

All scientist and phylosophers try to describe things wit rigid absolute stable mind while simple the universe never was or will be stable or absolute so eventually end up BREAK somewhere anyway :D But good enough for now

I hate the AI voice

Crap