Just buy and invest in Gold or other reliable stock , the government has failed us and we cant keep living like this.

Yes, gold is a great investment and a good bet against the devaluating dollar, been holding some for awhile now, I’m grateful my adviser’s moment by moment changes in the market are lightening quick, cos who know how much losses I would’ve had by now.

Please can you leave the info of your lnvestment advsor here? I’m in dire need for one

There are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’Colleen Rose Mccaffery” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

She appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran a Google search on her name and came across her website; thank you for sharing.

😂😂

Haha 😂

"Money is like manure. You have to spread it around or it smells." - J. Paul Getty

@@DrSanity7777777 I knew it wasn't an original thought. I prefer the updated version I wrote.

@@James-mb3jemore contemporary, init.

just for starters we would be getting a honest person for a liar which could only be for the better

Does Gary really care though?

Perhaps not Chancellor, certainly inner circle of advisers. Improvement on Dominic Cummings and the rest. Or House of Lords; I’d support that.

He cares more than you ever have done or you ever will..... because you done sweet F.A!!

The system is built on an idea that people like Gary could never get into power. The whole purpose of the parliamentary system to protect of the super rich.

Gary does comment a lot on this. Watch his other posts.

There are so many comments popping up all over the socials criticising Labour for stuff they haven't done because they weren’t in power. 14 years of Tory destruction and you're having a go at Labour?

+1 he does. He understands the relationship between money and power

Gary doesn’t reply to comments but highlights financial analysis to making people aware of the causes of financial decadence and financial inequalities. Gary exposes the issues but not the solution. The real issue is a failed political system that calls itself democratic dating back to Cromwell. Time to move on utilizing modern technology, therein lies the solution.

Gary can speak for himself in the uploads, butI would say he does indeed touch on solutions, he outright states that we need democratic reforms, even revolutionary reforms for workers. It's old technology. It's been suppressed. Time to reclaim it.

Really? Do you not think it’s just a repackaged 70’s Labour dogma? Yes he wears a beanie, and has that “one of the people” aesthetic, but i haven’t seen much on policy detail and proper analysis 🙏🏼

What was 70 s dogma? Most people who would be old enough to remember or understand that are probably in boot hill...

Never heard any politician tell it like this, possibly because they don't understand, care,or maybe its just their aversion to truth and the problems that come from an informed herd.

@@lawrencebywater2112 lolz. perhaps you should look into his background

​@@lawrencebywater2112 His policy is 'tax wealth'. It's pretty straight forward. I'm not sure how much detail you need.

I am also AMSAPHM9 Holders 🚀

AMSAPHM9 is still extremely undervalued

It is funny that not everyone knows about AMSAPHM9

this is only crypto project that I see has real use

AMSAPHM9 is still extremely undervalued

Just the NHS left...

That is true but in order to oppose selling off public assets you probably need an ideology which implicitly rejects the universalism of the new left AND the new right. You have to basically say “the British governments responsibility is to the well being of the British people to the exclusion of others”. And to “progressive” leftists, liberals and free market globalists that is basically a heresy

There's about 70 million people living here, full of assets. Once the suicide pill gets legalised, we can become organ harvesting capital of the world.

We call it Thatcherism, but we really should call it for what it was, Milton Friedman( ism)

@@billB101 Friedrich Hayek.

Its worse than that. The NHS is being carved up by corporations. The food producers. Clothing. Every aspect of our life is owned by big business corporations. This is what he is actually talking about. 🌹

Yes, there’s a lot of smaller farms being bought up solely for their carbon offsets. Corporates are taking them out of production and consequently closing local stores, schools and communities in general.

Alot of people are ladder kickers, always wanting themselves to be better off for others to be worse off.

​@@oliverp3545it's worse than that, it's people who are living well not realising they are the poor who just haven't had the tide of shit that is "rent seeking" lap at thier door.

I got the "you're just envious of the rich" put-down from a young, aggressive get-rich-quick guy. The kind who's hunting for some hot investment (like the start of a ponzi scheme), so he can get his.

Wow that's huge, how do you make that much monthly?

I'm 44yrs and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how?

Honestly speaking, I will continue to trade and stick to Juliana Heidi daily analysis and guides as long as it works well for me..

For real? I'm super excited. Juliana heidi strategy has normalized winning trades for me also. and it's a huge milestone for me looking back to how it all started😀

I'm overwhelmed coming across you guys testifying about this wonderful lady. Love from Calgary, Alberta🇨🇦😀

We cannot Vote our way out of this in our First Past the Post system. I would say if one party puts it as a Manifesto Promise to introduce Proportional Representation vote for them other than that vote to prevent either Tory Blue or Tory Red from gaining a Working Majority, gotto break this 2 Wings of the same Bird Cancer.

Proportional representation is the only way forward. But what party that has won under FPTP will propose that?

@@thegrowl2210 Honestly i think we gotta force it by breaking the backs of a working majority of the Two Cheeks of the same Ass Parties so we can get a party in the running who will?

When you try to take power away from the 3 media barons that control all UK media they will mobilise and destroy your political party. You can explain things like Gary does until your voice gives out but when every red top and TV news and other YT talking head is telling the working and middle classes that the party are communists who want to stop them becoming wealthy, you will not get the votes. To deny this is to argue that voters will never vote irrationally and against their own interests. Something no one can be serious about given even the past decade.

The super-rich are physically mobile but their "tax base" is fixed. Its you & me & the land of the country. Basically you tax the income at source, before it goes anywhere else. Lets say you live somewhere with a 15% tax. You get taxed at 40% in the UK and you get a 40% tax credit so you don't pay another 15% where you are. Currently you pay 0% tax here and 15% where you are. That has to end.

That's true. All the fancy taxation schemes have loopholes built-in on purpose, so that the rich can avoid basically paying any taxes. While the rest either cannot use them as they are salaried (so they already gets the after tax amount) or it's made this way so that it's only getting beneficial to use from a certain threshold that only the top 1% reach

@@evildrome Won't work, as these people will just move away. It has happened in EVERY country that tried to tax the rich, they move away, unless they are denied a passport, and/or to transfer the money abroad. So it can't be done. The best one can do is to make sure the state is not vasting tax money. And now they spend a lot on things that should never be allowed. It's a great idea that the state should do everything for us but who wants to live like in the Soviet Union? Very very few, that's for sure.

I Was thinking something similar. Or is it just the a lie they have spread to justify them not being taxed . If they want to sell there stuff in a market ,shouldn't they pay for access to that market ?

@@cryptoslacker-464 Well we all “pay for access”, as the business pay VAT on their sales, and the people working for the company pay taxes on their salaries plus all kinds of fees etc etc. The issue with not paying tax on the profit is the fact that global companies deduct losses in country towards the profit in another. This practice needs to be looked at for sure. How many jobs has Amazon itself cost most western countries? No one knows.

We understood this for 200 years. Then after the postwar economic boom things got radically better for the working class and the class war was forgotten. But not by elites, who reignited it in the late 70s.

In my opinion, it’s less that people can’t deal with class and more work is valued strangely. The biggest thing our society has forgotten is that there is a certain amount of risk that is tied to high value jobs. If you want something consistent chances are you won’t earn a lot doing it. Inversely, there -are- consistent paying jobs that disproportionally pay a handsome salary. CEOs come to mind. I’m not saying that their job is easy, but can you really say that a CEO works 400 to 1000 times harder than a floor employee? What sort of risk does a CEO take on when they inherit a Fortune 500 company with a golden parachute handy if things go bad? Does a football player or a singer provide significantly more value than a high school teacher? There are highly visible discrepancies in the way our economy values work and people are getting fed up with getting crumbs when others take huge chunks of the cake.

one of the major benefits of leaving the uk (for 6 months or more) is that it enables you to realise just how powerful the omnipresent tory/neoliberal propaganda machine that permeates every corner of that nation is...simply because you are no longer having it pumped into your life. That realisation is as revealing as it is depressing. the (very) depressing part is that, now, you can see right through it, see how carefully crafted the machin'es output is, see the endless flow of (invariably wealth serving) attacks/robberies that it blinds your fellow citizens from even suspecting are happening, let alone sees them demanding an end to and/or immediate, independent and serious investigation into ! You see how it covers the ruinous corruption/crimes again and again with the same old alibis/cover stories which are always built around the same two carefully selected concepts: 'blundering' and 'incompetence'. And then you come to realise the real reason such a contrived fuss is made around "the spread of misinformation" and it's 'inherent dangers' .

what is gfc

We are sleep walking into agenda 2030 and the Davis plan.... 🤦🏼‍♀️

Here in the UK it’s a matter of one step at a time. What has to happen right now is that you vote for whichever progressive party candidate (Liberal Democrat/ Labour/ Green) is most likely to beat any other party in your constituency. Then once a progressive party is in power you and everyone you know have to send letters and letters and petitions to your MP for a more proportional/ democratic electoral system (look up the campaign for electoral reform). Once the system of Government is made better it will be easier for you to know who to back to get the change you want.

The UK Ship of State is not a Taxi that can turn on a sixpence. The UK's turning circle is large, and it's engines are more like those of the MV Dali right now - suspect, poorly maintained, and in need of repair. The postwar years or so have been a big psyop, where the insecurities of the British establishment have steered this country into even more troubled waters than the UK faced after World War II. And unless everyone else wakes upto that fact, nothing much will change. We have to be the change we want to see in the world, and voting is only a very small part of that, but still important. Voting alone won't change things. We have to stop believing absurdities before we can stop committing atrocities on ourselves and others. Just a thought.

Thanks, that's sound advice

Gary doesn’t reply to comments but highlights financial analysis to making people aware of the causes of financial decadence and financial inequalities. Gary exposes the issues but not the solution. The real issue is a failed political system that calls itself democratic dating back to Cromwell. Time to move on utilizing modern technology, therein lies the solution.

Yep, power, wealth, information. You can swap any two for the third.

Their money is in assets. The wealth is the asset. Its (monetary) value, relative to the productive labour that creates wealth has been inflated. When Marx wrote Das Capital, money had labour value through the gold standard. The price of gold was related to the human effort in finding it & digging it up. We should think about what, if anything, gives money its value now.

@@ethelminigold is money everything else is debt. JP Morgan said that a long time ago.

Gimme a link to the LSE paper, Alex, pretty please. 😇 Or are you referring to the LSE news article "Britain’s super rich unlikely to move to ‘boring’ and ‘culturally barren’ tax havens". If so, I'll read that. 😊

@@robinmorritt7493 The trouble is, when the rich move in, the first thing to go is things that don't make money, like culture and arts...

@@daveturner4134 I confess I tend to see things the other way round.

In Australia too

Cool man 😊

All money is created as debt because that's what money is. All "financial instruments" have an "asset" and a "liability". Someone owns the asset and someone has the liability. The fact that someone "owes" you something is your asset and their liability. Gold, for example is not a "financial instrument". It is a commodity with inherent exchange value. Imagine you are a new government. You have £0. You want to create £1, what do you do? You create £1, an asset, and £1 of "national debt", the liability. Essentially you're taking what you have, which is zero, and splitting it into +1 and -1, which = zero. When you go to a bank and take out a loan its YOU that creates the money. When you sign a loan agreement, you have created an asset and a liability. All the bank does is buy the asset (the loan agreement) from you. From Proffesor Richard Werner: "Banks don't lend money. At law, it's very clear, they're in the business of purchasing securities. That's it. So you say okay, don't you confuse me with all that legalese, no, I want a loan. Fine! Here's the long contract, here's the offer letter and you sign. At law it's very clear you have issued the security, namely a promissory note, and the bank is going to purchase that. That's what's happening. Put it in layman's terms what does that mean? It means that what the bank is doing is very different from what it presents to the public that it's doing. What we call a deposit is simply the bank's record of its debt to the public "

A lot of people still make massive profit from the crypto market, all you really need is a relevant information and some ‹professional advice. ‹it's totally inappropriate for investors to hang on while suffering from dip during significant

No I don't trade on my own anymore, I always required help and assistance

From my personal financial advisor

Here is her line she’s always active

+1667

Well it might be

@@CCP_Operative well it wasn't because everytime the tax on the rich has dropped GDP has also dropped. Less investment equals smaller growth. Therefore lowering your income is only going to decrease investment in the country.

And think how much better we would have done without that confiscatory taxation. Essentially you are saying that government and bureaucrats are better asset allocators than private individuals. And the evidence of all of history is that that is emphatically not the case.

@@stevenfarrall3942 well seen as GDP was growing quicker when the tax was higher. I'd say that is a great indicator that the government was better at allocating that money, as they invested it in the country to improve it, whereas a rich person invests for themseleves to make money, so they will just buy stocks which unless it's the initial sale it does nothing for the economy or they buy housing, which just increases the price of housing which means people are spending less in the economy and more on housing constricting the economy. Not to mention investment is pre tax meaning that high taxes incourage investment so let's say you are correct and the rich person is a better allocator well high taxes forces them to allocate. Whereas low taxes will make them take the money out of the economy.

GDP also counts unproductive financial trading as if it were productive, so it isn't a good measuring tool of productivity.

I was literally gonna ask "what's with the sad little biscuits? "🤣

@@staceyjinuk9714 Or the other way about. You need less and less gold to buy them bits of (intrinsically valueless) paper.

Lol

Don't let the biscuits distract you that's how we end up in these situations

@@PHI77IP85 I listened mate, seriously, I can do both hear and see at once, I'm dead clever 😐

Yeah, just takes more bits of paper to buy the same amount of gold.

I'd pay mortgage or car or credit card bill. I won't waste it on clothes, holidays or botox.

Where do you get any evidence that people would not use it for training , paying off debt or many other things?

How many lottery winners stay rich?

And by paying debts off, you again are just transferring back the cash to the mega rich who lent you the money for the life you couldn’t afford.

@@christurner1937And then you tax them again! You should look at the results of the studies that gave regular payments to poor people. They made wise choices-ate better food, got the car fixed, went to the dentist-supporting the local economy, could take time off from the low paying job to go interview for a better paying one. Poverty is a lack of cash, not a lack of character. And poor people know better what they need than those who think they are above them.

Justified !

Ha ha you beat me to it !

Oh dear, I'm so unoriginal 😂

Or the Old Gits on Harry Enfield..

Burnt a million

Sad to say but that is a thought that has occurred to me too.

Yeah bro, love Gary. But I'd be very suprised if he makes it to 2025. Especially how quickly hes gaining traction. This mans got his finger right on the pulse.

Foreign wealth buys from the wealthy not from the asses...

Absolutely not, the country would collapse. And you'd be to blame.

@@Craig121000 what benefits do they bring? Just asset inflation, and that’s of no benefit

Find the billions to buy those assets, and buy them. Quit your yapping.

@@Craig121000 thanks for not answering the question

Evil evil Milton Fridman. Didn't he screw over South America in the 70's. He and the Chicago boys?

More of his what?

The wisest thought that is in everyone's minds today is to invest in different income flows that do not depend on the government, especially with the current economic crisis around the world. This is still a good time to invest in gold, silver and digital currencies (BTC, ETH... Stock)

She is really a good investment advisor. I was privileged to attend some of her seminars. That is how I started my crypto investment

I have heard about her excellent trading expertise in CNBC news, guess she's more popular in United States

YES!!! That's exactly her name (Sarah Jennie Davis) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her from Brisbane Australia

This sounds so good and i would like to be a party to this, is there any way I can speak with her?

We need leaders who will listen and act on Gary's advice x

Also, unless they are consumed, the value of those biscuits in Gary's portfolio is going to drive a further increase in the wealth gap.

I don't know if he ever washes up but the Fairy Liquid isn't going down either.

Hes waiting til the stock price on biscuits fall! 😂

This reminds me of the screen in Theme Hospital where you have to reach a pay agreement for your staff before the biscuits run out

During COVID, people's ordinary income went to zero. This would be money on top of your ordinary income. Also, that'd why he talked about burning the money. The impact of the rich losing the money is as important if not more important than ordinary people gaining it

Perhaps we should return to Biblical principles as found in the Tora. Jews were not allowed to practice usury and even assets that were acquired had to be returned to the original owner every 50 years or jubilee in order to keep a check on the accumulation of wealth at the expense of others.

​@@plagiarisedwords The problem with the Covid furlough scheme is that it was 80 % of your income so rich people got more than poor people. Also rich people had drop in discretionary spending like holidays meals out etc. which offset any drop in income. Poor people didn't really experience a drop in outgoings.

@plagiarisedwords Burning money is a nonsensical suggestion to be honest. Removing the ability of the gov/central bank to print money IS the only solution. Everything else is just mental masturbation no different from what MMT proponents spew. You stop the bleeding and not plaster over it.

And we keep taxing the rich at high rates-make it a quarterly event if not annually.

There's no such thing as equality.

@@Craig121000 In the UK? You're absolutely right - equality is a fading memory.

That last part is crucial, party donors will dry up for established parties so Gary’s ideas will never make it into policy with them. Needs to be a self sufficient smaller party or grassroots campaign or something ..

It's not on offer, no party supports it. They all offer various levels of iniquity. Remember, they're rich and are owned by the rich.

Now to mitigate damage I'd say vote for just about anyone who's not a tory and is likely to win, but voting is not the end of the story. None of the existing parties will meaningfully change this system as things stand. Big changes come from educating, agitating, organising, etc.

@@garethhhhh but presumably it could be if we could put enough pressure on - was interested to see who Gary thinks would give the ideas the most welcome reception…

Labour will win the next election and with their current platform will fail to solve the country’s problems. This will leave them open to attack and they’ll need to either pivot to less orthodox solutions or they’ll be a 4-5 year one time government.

Same here, I operate a wide - range of investments with help from my financial advisor. My advice is to get a professional who will help you, plan and enhance your management skills. For the record, working with Sarah Hudson, has been an amazing experience.

As a beginner, it's essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. I'm guided by a widely known crypto consultant, same Sarah Hudson mentioned here

Getting Sarah Hudson to help me really helped me clear all my debits. I started with what I have left and it's been the best decision I ever made

Multiple streams of income should be applied because from the CNCB quarters recently their newscaster made it known that If you don't find a means of multiplying your income you will wake up one day to realize you didn't plan well

I'm new at this, please how can I reach her?

The sikhs do a similar thing

@@lazylad8544 Yes my understanding is for Sikhs the rate is 20%.

But is it the rich' money being burned? No.

Contraction but from what starting point and what level do they want you to contract too? It’s the same as the ‘deficit’ which politicians live to say ‘has gone down by x percent’ knowing that the overall debt is still ballooning and that people don’t know extremely important difference between the two terms.

Not really. You assume that the BOE is allowing the securities they bought to mature, right? Nope. They're selling them off at a discount to bond dealers, which just reduces the BOE's balance sheet, and nothing more. And the biggest purchasers of Bonds are? The Asset Wealthy who got the stimulus money in the first place, and not ordinary people. So the asset wealthy are getting a final bung from their buddies at the BoE. That is why asset prices have not collapsed by any significant amount, and inflation is sticky, even as energy prices are deflating due to the global depression. That is why the Yield Curve is still inverted, and why GDP is the most deceptive economic indicator devised by economists. Remember £800 billion was pumped into the UK economy, and the BOE is ripping the UK taxpayers off by selling back the bonds into the money supply at a discount. And that's the false impression people if QT, but their wallets know the truth, as their purchasing power disappears faster than the toothpaste in an open tube stood on by an elephant. It's the Cantillon Effect caused by being sustained by the BOE own actions. Hence the K-shaped recovery, where the incomes of the asset wealthy continue to go to the moon, and the ALICEs - Asset-Limited, Income Constrained, and Employed continue to have their purchasing power eroded.

Thank god someone really understands what the BoE is really doing - an accounting exercise, - while the QE wealth remains in the hands who got the vast majority of it - asset wealthy individuals and corporations, including the financial sector. All done by the BOE selling off the bonds they purchased at full price back to the bond dealer banks they from bought them at full at a discount. Thereby shafting the UK taxpayer to boot.

It isn't, we have a deficit which neccesetates growing money in the private sector, it may seem in contraction though to most people because it is being siphoned off to the wealthy.

Very true

That works but for me I always save a % first, primarily in a Roth IRA then other things that I think will do decent. First thing everyone needs to do is get rid of their debt and put everything you can into getting rid of it. Took me over a decade to get rid of my debt after school and now I am actually not dead broke and it feels good. I am far from well off in today’s terms but I owe no money to anyone. Of course I have to pay insurance and other expenses but I could cancel them anytime and owe them nothing.

You persuade them to watch these videos. Gary explains things in a "counter narrative " way, in other words, he takes the popular talking points and explains how that is wrong. Choose three videos that state your point. I suggest this one. 🌹

That's a good point as we have DelBoy types earning average salaries thinking they're the rich

@@staceyjinuk9714 I’m afraid it’s not that simple, I’ve read Gary’s book and watched his videos for sometime, but if you try to apply some of Gary’s points to the conversation it’s like talking to a “get brexit done” voter, to arrogant to consider anyones point of view other than their own. It’s a shambles these people vote for who they like, rather than polices and for life of me I can not work out why, they are educated and well paid people, but lack any critical thinking skills/common sense.

@@dwane3950 I understand you perfectly. I personally dislike and distrust anyone who votes for the tories because of my upbringing (I grew up in the 80s when Maggie was in power) I do understand. My only suggestion can be do it slowly. When they make a statement that can be debunked, correct it then say nothing, don't get involved with tit for tat counter arguments. You might never bring them around. What you can do, the only thing you can do, is state your position and hold steadfast to it. Good luck 🌹

@@staceyjinuk9714 thank you for the advice 🥰

Nope. To reverse the Cantillion Effect caused by QE, one cannot let just the purchasing power of the money pumped into the economy and accumulated overwhelmingly by the asset wealthy be eroded by inflation. But that is exactly what the BOE and the Treasury, and other central banks are doing. In particular, the BOE are only reducing what is held on their balance sheet. In effect, that's an accounting exercise, leaving the £800 million of assets in the pockets of the Asset Wealthy, which they are spending on buying more assets, and crowding out the ALICEs of those markets - the (A)sset-(L)imited, the (I)ncome-(C)onstrained, and the (E)mployed. What's worse, the BoE is not allowing the Bonds they purchased from the Dealer Banks to keep them afloat during Covid to mature. They are selling them back to the dealers at a discount. So the post-Covid K-shaped income recovery is being entrenched, with the incomes of the ALICEs being depleted as their purchasing power is also being eroded, whilst the passive incomes of the Asset wealthy continue to appreciate in quantity and value. The only way to reverse this increasing spread between the two groups is tax the asset wealthy. This will reduce the money supply in real terms, and not just in nominal accounting-exercise terms. And those who got most of the stimulus will bear the cost. Not the ALICEs who got very little. In fact, all QE has proven is that the 1) financial capitalism of today is replicating the mistakes of the past in entrenching rentierism and unproductive investment. 2) people hear what they want to hear, and don't always know what they are being told isn't true, and 3) not disincentivising rentierism is a political choice that will impoverish ordinary people, and destroy real economic growth by reducing the resilence of the economy as a whole, whilst politically and economically disenfranchising the ALICE majority. Too much rentierism creates economic instability and prohibits wealth creation amongst those who need it the most.

He has plenty of money. Now he banking off KZfaq. Maybe he should divide all his assets to the people who watch him. Talk means nothing but action is what matters.

Don't you find the enclosures-private ownership of land at least to be the root of all the problems? As a limited resource we should be managing land very differently-don't get me started on how we should eliminate inheritance of land.

@@2Question-Everything Sure, I tried to keep it short (I stink at that…). I know how the transition happened from feudalism into “modernity”. Those threatened managed to influence legislation to both protect and - the new thing - trade land ownership. Land wasn’t “capital” before that, rather the produce from it were commodities to some extent (trade, not consumption). Labour was either slaves or serfs, “money” was an instrument for the rich. There were no labour markets, or indebtedness in money terms for “people” - as taxation from “commoners” were their produce itself. The thought of money circulation as a labour & consumption forced incentive came with industrialisation. Mortgages and later consumer debt was the commodification of money, a parallel to the rentier economy of premodern time. Now though, rentism is back - but not for the state coffers, rather it’s _allowed_ by the state as a liberalist policy. This has led to financialization of the economy - making money from money. That’s not even a producing economy, so waged workers are unable to keep up with the nominal economy, and basic needs are totally linked to having money - not capital. Last time this happened, two world wars and a finance depression forced ONE generation of leaders to rethink inequality. The short time from 1945 (1934 US?) to 1980 (1971 US) was indeed the exception in civilised human history. That period of “capitalism” is over, so maybe we should observe what we actually experience - not what we used to believe? 😜👍

Bitcoin doesn’t have a burn mechanism built into the protocol. Only shit coins do that. Bitcoins monetary policy is a fixed one(it doesn’t inflate nor deflate) Only 21M will ever exist.

I think that might be an overdub in production to try and correct a mistake or something.

@@garyseconomics haha fair enough. There’s me thinking it had a deeper meaning. 😅