thanks 😂😂

Thanks for your feedback, glad to have you here 💪

Same here, and also package management system

I am also learning zig and since zig is young so the tools around it is also quite young. I think the environment around it will grow and improve once it hits the stable threshold.

Same, I've come to adore the language. My biggest gripe, however, is that there is no notational difference between variables and pointers to variables (pointers to structs still use . for member access, as opposed to ->). This makes it very hard to reason about "ownership" when I'm returned something - in C/C++ I know I'm pointing to something when I have to use -> and thus I have to consider who frees this memory.

@@lufenmartofilia5804 With 0.12.0 there is a well functioning package manager, for anybody else reading these comments.

😂 very nice, I will also build a very big game in the future using zig

you're wellcome

I don't like the sintax that much either but features like passing allocators for all the things are exactly the things that are needed in game developement so this is why I might switch to it

the syntax and many other features of the language are often like those benches they have with too many arm rests on them so that hobos can't lie down on them to stay off the cold pavement. Sure they are awkward sometimes even if you are sitting in them correctly, but on the plus side, there are no stinking hobos loitering around. Who are the hobos? That's a little too philosophical of a question for the point I am trying to make here.Superficial pleasantness is not generally something zig is trying to do for your. But it is doing things for you. And if you let it, and you actually like the more substantial things its trying to do for you, its kind of pleasant eventually.

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 well Odin your best bet then.. you can switch the allocator at will incase you need it.. it always pass explicitly to the current context..

@@_slierAnd Odin is purposefully written as low level gamedevelopment language.

I'll keep the idea in mind thanks

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 That would be awesome.

yes 💪🤣

wow it seems like many people here like odin ok if I have time I'll give it a try 💪

How do you debug Odin programs in Linux? AFAIK Odin has been hashing out their dependencies on glibc and such for their own implementations and causing issues for external tools to debug Odin projects as a result of that. Or at least that's what a I read in a post of an engineer working on Embergen (written in Odin).

Is odin faster?

@@longiusaescius2537 no, but but the difference is tiny. The syntax is super clean though

​@@stefanstefanov00Odin can be debugged with any tool you'd use to debug C. gdb, lldb, visual studio, RAD Debugger, RemedyBG, etc

hm I might make one if many people ask but it is just an idea right now.

😂

neither python nor bash is a programming language, so you're not a programmer but a scripter

@@rxn7 I do rust now.

@@dionnix based

@@rxn7I can't tell if I'm about to be whooshed, but that is a rubbish take.

mogus

many people told me about odin, it has to be a great language

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 it’s great for game development. It helped me grasp how memory management works better than C and C++. It’s extremely similar to C. It’s like a Pascal-C baby. It isn’t designed to be a language with a killer feature(s), but a language of simplicity

yeah zig do be kinda sus sometimes 💀

thx

it is ok rn

Yeah part of it is that I am not used to it but also that is kinda wordy (I understand that everything is explicit but I don't like typing cast all day)

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 i see. Maybe it needs new approach? Maybe by trying to translate what you know form c/c++ you accidentally bring castings? Maybe it can be expressed differently?

I am not without a few minor complaints about some of the syntax, but compared to C++ or Rust, it is fantastic. Naming conventions are a bit odd IMHO; it does make sense and have some "rules" about it, just doesn't fit my personal taste. I write it using the conventions, I just wish they were different.

@@ForeverZer0 C++ "syntax"...no comments :) What complaints you have to Rust? IMHO one should compare Zig to C and Rust to C++ for mostly fair comparision.

@@AK-vx4dy I completely agree those are more comparable in regard to their practical application, I was just comparing the more general "old vs new" of systems-level languages. Rust as absolutely awful syntax, and this comes from someone who thinks it is a great language, just not swept up in the "rewrite everything in Rust" fandom. Things like unclosed single-quotes having lexical significance, every line requiring 8 sets of brackets and chained function calls just to retrieve a wrapped value, etc, etc. are not a good recipe for an aesthetically pleasing syntax IMHO.

😂

Zig Ha... oh wait

mugus

yes it will probably the best language for game developement but it is not out yet :((

Not like you can just try it

​@@lowlevelgamedev9330 Just ask that Jai guy

thanks! ඞ

seems like many people want me to. I might try it

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 you can find a nice project here: kzfaq.info/sun/PLqN23W-K4Tn2LdgSCJOCFFiPO26mvsXm3

mogus

no lol

amogus

sus

😭💀 still don't get it but it's ok

no not at all, gamedev industry is moving away from oop 💪

😂😂

you can but it's a third party app that does that (zvm)

amogus

I'm from Romania, and yes I'm trying to talk slower it's hard for me 😭😭 but I'll get there

yes very good

yes 😂😂 at least it has very good features

I didn't know that nice

​@@lowlevelgamedev9330 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prmmhrtz1NjbZHU.html Search for: Top 5 Fastest Programming Languages: Rust, C++, Swift, Java, and 90 more compared!

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 ​ Yep, it came first in Dave's Garage 'Top 5 Fastest Programming Languages' kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prmmhrtz1NjbZHU.html

yeah I don't like the sintax either but in terms of features it is probably the best so :/

Why?

actually as far as I know that is something for the future so it won't happen very soon but idk

maybe late, but the reason llvm is going (its not going btw), there will be a version that uses llvm, and one that doesnt. the idea behind having a version that doesnt use llvm is that it builds faster, and smaller. easier for debug builds for devs trying to improve the language

I believe it was also the only way they believe they can make incremental compilation viable ( I might have misunderstood that though)@@pyyrr

Thanks for pointing it out. I edited the audio so hopefully this won't be a problem in future videos

​​@@lowlevelgamedev9330I didn't meant to be rude. Is just that audio is 80% of the experience in a programming video and plenty of programmer KZfaqrs make the same blunder. Is such an up in quality when it doesnt sound like an earthquake when they type.

haven't tried it yet

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 My personal opinion it captures the spirit of C without all of the fuss. Just the compiler and you and simple rules that let you go to town. Like you mentioned everything I was doing in C was kind of built in to Odin so I like it. The Pascal style of syntax grows on you fast as well.

@@sumofat4994 I feel the same way

😂😂

Building a newer better language is easier said than done for sure. The fact that they were able to add features to C++ and keep backwards compatibility given the rapid growth and change of technology over 40 years is astonishing. Rust is not even 10 years old and it’s self imploding sadly.

@@devon9374 how is it self imploding? And why?

@@ohwow2074 Basically there was some drama within the committee and part of the foundation left and forked Rust into CrabLang. I was kinda of joking about the implosion, however, only time will tell.

@@devon9374 oh I heard about that. The language itself is not bad though. If it keeps evolving we'll see how much flexibility it has.

haven't heared of V ill check it out 💪

hmm that's kinda a wierd comparison, but it has very good features and simplicity (that rust sure doesn't have :))

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 For sure rust does not. I'm still confused about zig. On its own might be very good, but I don't see it interfaces easily with others.

@@rocknowradio it does, it has full interoperability with C/C++, has C ABI and can build all of them using the zig cc compiler and the build system. It is a drop in replacement to C, while still having access to any C libraries you were using before. For example for games, it can work with anything that odin has access to (raylib, sdl, vulkan,etc), and has its own upcoming framework for games but will not be finalized till the 1.0 release which is either 2025 or 2026 according to the creator. (subject to change). The language is kept concise and compact on purpose in order to avoid bloat like c++ and now sadly even rust falling for the same trap. Has better benchmarks than Go for web and Rust for computation. The zig build system and compiler can also build for nearly all platforms without the need for external build tools or dependencies as it's all zig. The route they going for managing packages is also very straightforward in the same vein as the newer GO style. The ONLY downside it suffers is from longer build times due to LLVM but that's something they want to get away from before 1.0 release. Go build times are great but zigs comptime feature is immensely powerful once you understand how to use it. Zig is primarily aimed at being successor to C while removing the limitations of C.

Trying to work at it. Thanks for the feedback 💪

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 i think accent is fine tbh you cant really get rid of that easily

🤣 amogus

amogus let's goo

among zig 😳

sus

good good 👍

mogus

zigmogus

amogus ඞ

amongus

amoamomogusgus