Fiber gives poison is 5G

What's your better one?

He literally explained it in the best way possible he's not wrong cable is a shared connection through out ur neighborhood of people who are using the same provider while fiber every person gets their own dedicated line this means 100times less congestion you will feel literally no lag at all

@@YokoMu-um4zb Except, if you understand how G-PON and XGS-PON fiber is implemented (the most common way to deploy residential FTTH), it is also technically shared due to the use of passive optical splitters similar to RF splitters used for cable. While there are some newer protocols that will use up to 8 separate colors to add additional capacity, the reality is that the fiber is still split and shared unless you manage to get a 10Gbps subscription. For example, for 10 Gbit XGS-PON, each fiber from the head is split 2^n ways (typically 32, 64, or 128 ways) via optical splitters, depending on how comfortable the ISP is with oversubscribing the link. Downstream data packets are flagged for the target subscriber and are picked up by the end-user ONT if the packet header matches, or otherwise discarded. Now, let's say you were to put 32 1Gbps subscribers on that link, there's still a potential for peak congestion since the link could be 3.2x oversubscribed. Upstream is TDMA (time-sliced) with the ONT transmitting upload data in assigned time windows allocated which is a bit more assured. Higher tier subscribers (2Gbps/5Gbps) get larger time slices than lower tier subscribers (300Mbit).

Smartest Roger’s employee