@@karoo_bushman6880 I fear a 16x16 would be too small. After all they have to put the needed components somewhere. They could do two 16x16 boards stacked. I'd prefer a whoop board because it has more space than a 20x20. And to save weight and unused space they could use 3 mounts only to make it smaller (like the diamond vtx from happymodel)

Camera comes first then frame/canopy/pods will come. for now we have to use an adapter for both the camera and board....when not using a 20x20 flight stack.

I need a 16x16 for my tadpole!

you all prolly dont give a shit but does anybody know of a way to log back into an instagram account..? I somehow forgot the account password. I would love any assistance you can offer me.

@Zev Miller Instablaster =)

@Carter Ronan Thanks for your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm waiting for the hacking stuff now. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will reply here later with my results.

@Carter Ronan It worked and I finally got access to my account again. I am so happy! Thank you so much you saved my account!

@Zev Miller Happy to help =)

yes, I think we all want both great fpv and onboard HD. I wonder what the technical limits of a single camera are. We might be finding out as no manufacturer has really made much of an improvement.

Agreed, the newest generation doesn't look that much better than the first generation runcam split.

Just get the caddex tasier same thing happened to me. With turtle v2 the 4k tarsier is legit and can take a beating

ha, where are the aliens from?

I would like to see them adjust the hd camera angle. I find them being the same but different views makes it more difficult to get the HD view "centered". I don't know how feasible that is, but its on my wish list.

yea, nothing super different. runcam has one coming out that is the whoop board shape. I hear latency is still an issue. :(

@@karoo_bushman6880 you could use a betw85hd canopy the turtle boards fits in the canopy

I Couldnt agree more and if space is an issue for caddax in the manufacturing process and not possible yet then why not 25×25mm layout would be great so at least it's the same size as a whoop board and more space for thier layout

I would expect the same price point as the turtle v2, but I really have no idea.

@@karoo_bushman6880 The runcam website. And it's available for pre-order at many places, Heli-direct for one.

@@karoo_bushman6880 shop.runcam.com/runcam-split-3-micro-and-split-3-nano/ its available for pre order at all the good fpv shops also.

And here www.getfpv.com/runcam-split-3-nano-fpv-hd-camera.html?cmid=eHZ3Y2tBWGYrQWM9&afid=aVlOV0hBdmd6THc9&ats=NjVUbFFoYTczYkk9&gclid=CjwKCAjw1_PqBRBIEiwA71rmteeFPgKwNzKLNQTfSLMZ8hhn4VZpK4WstNLHGk3t2KmKVNCYeUMTERoC5cgQAvD_BwE read the description the nano has smaller board than the micro.

@@SingelkerkUtrecht I guess you will have to forgive me, the original Runcam ad on Facebook or the website said the nano was a 16x16 and the micro was 20x20 and the get fpv ad says 14x 14 so a few places are reporting different sizes. I specifically put off getting the micro because I was waiting for the nano but now it seems only the camera is smaller. I'm sure it's only a matter of time before we get smaller.

I haven't seen the RC split nano yet, is there video up on it?

@@NickBurnsFPV Yeah, Gal Kramer did a video on it if I'm not mistaken. 😊

@@NickBurnsFPV Sorry, I just checked. It was Albert Kim. 😊

on the nano? I think the nano version just officially became available.

@@NickBurnsFPV Exactly!

I need to find time to watch it again, its been a long time.

I have considered it, but its all about time. When I am out and about, its on family duties...taking kids to various places or to a store to get something. I often fly over lunch or quick breaks on the weekend.

tsk tsk, how can one forget :)

I really don't know if they are bumping up against the technology wall with a single camera or waiting on the chip makers to innovate. time will tell.

Yes, I have a v2 firmware that has fixed it a few times for me. This is the v2 one I have been using, sometimes I have to run it more than once drive.google.com/file/d/1_tbYdXk0XRIaiLV6wrsBNoVS27ImVQYk/view?usp=sharing

Product review tips? I am very biased how I do things. I prefer to show the product, report its specs and reserve my opinion for later in the review where those wanting to hear what I think are still watching. I try to avoid saying things that I am unsure of or bring up a topic and defer to the viewer to decide. As to getting more product for review it can be a slippery slope: one we need viewers...and all the complications that come with that in the big space of the internet. Two, vendors want sales, they won't care how good the video is or how many people see it if they don't see sales they will not likely send review samples. Number two is very tricky. If you "sell" everything and viewers get burned by the product they won't come back and likely start to campaign against the channel, on the other hand if viewers aren't interested in the product they won't buy it either. This is were not reviewing everything and knowing what the audience might be interested in is important. Getting started we have to spend our own money, so our own desires in the review videos play a role. I get sent stuff I didn't agree to review, when this happens I am attempt to be very clear with the manufacturer/vendor I didn't ask for the item and therefore may not make a video review on the item. Some presume I "need" product to review, as if I were fulltime or something. I also attempt to make it clear this is a hobby, I am not invested in just making videos. There is much more nuance to it that could take a great deal of time to cover, this is the high level view from my perspective.

no usb. removing it is pretty straight forward and not a two handed operation. Just like with the runcams. I can get you a bit rate later tonight when I get home.

@@NickBurnsFPV It's cool nick just curious is all. Great job as usual Bud

I believe it was 180P 60fps

@@NickBurnsFPV I'm sorry it is mey English... I meant carbon frame which you use to monut camera on 😀

Haha I was looking for this question, but unfortunately Nick got confused 😅 I was wondering as well

I am not equipped for a good latency test. From my stick experience, I don't notice any additionally latency over any other fpv camera I have used.

simple tpu mount. One I printed off thingiverse. Sorry I don't have the link to it. :(

@@NickBurnsFPV so are you saying that the camera has a good vibration/gelo free starting point? Compare to others.

jello in video is a multipart issue. One is camera mounting, another is the quad and its own vibrations, the pid tune of the quad and last would be the use of an ND filter. The nd filter (which I don't have for this camera), gets the last bit of jello out of the footage.

The low light isn't great on these. Specifically the smaller lens limits the amount of light that it can take in. I can't say specifically I have seen that issue.

@@NickBurnsFPV Thanks a lot, and also thanks for the Uruav85 review, that was very helpful too!

Not to me. Still soft or muddy.

And 2 grams

With editing and encoding there is a change to the footage, I have also seen HD youtube footage playback poorly on various computers, or if the computer resources are in heavy use. I tend to reboot or close high memory usage applications before playing HD footage.

If you can diy a way to mount it, it would work.

No. They have all seen the quads up close, some have gone for ride alongs as well.

@@NickBurnsFPV That's great. I've just started flying around my property with 2" and 3" and getting a little nervous as neighbors seeing me cruising my property. I can see people being upset and thinking it's going to do a fly away or hurt kids blah blah blah. Keeping fingers crossed.

@@davidfaul5080 My best advise would be the next time you talk with your neighbors, bring it up in conversation and end with asking if they would like to see one, or if you have spare goggles offer to have them "ride" along.

For HD footage I think the caddx is better out of the box.

I suspect they look at that form factor as specialized, more 20x20 flights stacks available than 36x36 boards.

The board is a bit smaller and so is the camera. A bit of weight savings might be important depending on the quad its placed in.

I need to get a few more reviews done, then we might be able to do a big giveaway.

Hey Nick need some help . Just on a new 2" build and when I hover this quad, then give a little throttle punch. It goes into a barrel roll. It has to be the Pids ,but knowing what to alter them to is my sore point . If you are on FB it would be easier to communicate @@NickBurnsFPV

@@madforit9661 I suspect this is the esc or a motor. Make sure none of the screws are touching the windings and all four motor feel the same when rotating them without power. To test the esc, plug in battery and usb, without prop, in the betaflight motors tab use the page up and page down keys to go all four motors 100% and 0% throttle quickly. Keep an eye for a motor that doesn't respond like the others. If there is a motor that doesn't respond like the others move it to a different arm and do the test again, if the same motor doesn't respond like the others, we have a faulty motor, if the poor response stays at the previous motor position we have an issue with the esc. I am on facebook, but very little during the day...work normal 8-5 job.

I was thinking on those lines The motors were getting hot while the lipo was just plugged in ,That to me is a short. Great hand warmers. I tested for a short but nothing. I removed all the screws from each motor, Plugged the lipo in The motors Stay cool . So even though I used my eye glass Looks like none of the screws are touching the windings. They have to be creating a short. Back on this tomorrow. Thanks for the quick response man@@NickBurnsFPV

I believe they do. It might even be the same cable as the original caddx turtle.

If your the "right" age I would hope so.

Hahaha fair enough Definitely a movie everyone should see at some point

FIRST!. And thank you

The runcam nano is on the way, 16 x 16 slated for release any day now.

@@karoo_bushman6880 ..I'm pretty sure he means a split nano cam with 16x16 HD board. Perfect for toothpick size birds.