Vs S400 Series: Tossing Nukes vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ateIjcSJ2J_Jgmw.html MLRS vs S-400: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bs1xjat-0amydqs.html USN ToT Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ftmCatyfzqqdhYE.html Kh-47M2 Kinzhal vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/etCThNGj27OsknU.html Sweden & Star Wars vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZlgZrSf0bzTnmQ.html WWI, WWII & Stealth vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pL-niLR41LW3pWw.html USAF 4th Gen Strike vs S-400 IADS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9WBa6xhlavSk3U.html Different USAF Bombers vs S-400: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l6mjldKArJa1hWg.html
@appalachianamerican20752 жыл бұрын
That last kill wasn't from the S-400, that was Tom Cruise using the scietologolical force to exact his revenge.
@DDGVET42 жыл бұрын
For what? Not making Top Gun II sooner?
@AndySpicer2 жыл бұрын
That was a wonderfully planned and executed suicide mission. Well done!
@gl1500ctv2 жыл бұрын
"The defense department regrets to inform you that your sons are dead because they were stupid." - RIP Goose
@OldFartGrows2 жыл бұрын
The mission failed, but the banter won the day
@Davros-vi4qg2 жыл бұрын
Might have missed this…. Why are cruise missiles at 5000ft?!? More like 50ft rl. Which means S400 gets about 20 miles or approx 3 minutes to react.
@krismurphy77112 жыл бұрын
The ENTIRE PURPOSE of the Tomahawks is to do NOE...Nap Of the Earth terrrain following at the lowest altitude possible.
@duthimer2192 жыл бұрын
I think that was ASL not AGL
@ser43_OLDC2 жыл бұрын
Just DCS programing, no cruise misile is flying at his lowest altitude
@Davros-vi4qg2 жыл бұрын
Shipwrecks have terrain following. Freakin’ cruise missiles don’t. Mmm… sim or propaganda tool!?!
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Don;t know but we can't control it.
@mikeck46092 жыл бұрын
Good job and great video. It’s a shame though that DCS can’t model actual EW warfare (nor could they since even 30 year old capabilities are still classified). One would never attack a site like this without EW support. With it, it’s quite manageable with a good plan. EW significantly degrades the range at which targets can be Engagaed AND creates even more false contacts. It wouldn’t see 72 TALDS and 20 missles 150 miles out. If would see static or nothing until -at a range much closer than it has in a “clean environment”, it sees hundreds of contacts approaching quickly. Wouldn’t need to launch many TALDS. I’m reality, the TALDS arent designed to be targets to overwhelm. They are designed to “stimulate” the air defense system to turn on and track so it can be located, fixed and either destroyed with JSOW, JASM low observable munitions or suppressed with HARMS.
@SukhoyBoy41132 жыл бұрын
Cope
@mixit24132 жыл бұрын
Well there is no reason why DCS couldn't model EW it would be an estimate as are many thing are already in the game I doubt the coding would be that hard.
@gregelliott21652 жыл бұрын
I think the TALDs were so bunched up (except for Grump's lovely spread) that a single Growler took out the lot of them. The planning was exceptional, execution was classic GR. Another fun video, well done.
@KortanaDCS2 жыл бұрын
You know, the worst bit is that this is without Skynet integration... It is gonna get a whole lot meaner soon 😈
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
ooooOOO eek
@castlekingside762 жыл бұрын
Russia has overlapping SAM coverage right now in Ukraine. S400/S300 etc. They haven't provided much protection against cruise missles and other aircraft. There's no way Russian troops would be this capable. Apparently Ukraine targets the radar systems and not the launchers. I like these simulations in terms of showing what Russian crews could do when trained under NATO standard. Secondly, Russian SAMS have shot down their own jets and SAM launchers. Literally shot themselves. Video on here of it.
@Eo_Tunun2 жыл бұрын
It's the typical russian overselling of the capabillities. The Moskva's S-300 search radar wasn't able to detect the two incoming missiles at all, as was evident from the tracking radar's antenna still being in the off-position when the power failed. The first thing the crew will have known about being under attack was when the first missile went *Bang!*
@user-qn3xu5ee3t2 жыл бұрын
Any statistics or that is just your pure fantasy?
@toetagjeee2 жыл бұрын
@@user-qn3xu5ee3t Russian sources are angry cause they cannot intercept HIMARS shooting up your precious warehouses. Btw. Putin Khuilo.
@chichotwojay7402 жыл бұрын
Except that US analysts say the exact opposite. That Russian air defences are virtually impossible to overcome, and that they are actually operating with great proficiency in Ukraine.
@ghostfacegrillah78912 жыл бұрын
@@chichotwojay740 Which is why literally everyone involved in that conflict is flying somewhere close to 50 meters off the ground
@thesquirejoosh40882 жыл бұрын
absolutely gorgeous mission but would love to see something similar with weegens as the TOT with their waypoint systems is my favorite.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
We did a ToT with Weegans on this one but we didn't use the waypoints: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZlgZrSf0bzTnmQ.html
@thesquirejoosh40882 жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers still awesome thanks!!
@jasonvick55 Жыл бұрын
“That’s one good thing about the S-400, is we can see it, seeing us. So, if we can see it, seeing us, then we know…it can see us” - Cap Love Caps words of wisdom 😉🤣
@randalljones43702 жыл бұрын
I realize the typical GR battleplan involving decoys goes something like "cram as many deck-ducks under the Bogs' wings then blaze in to under a klick and blaze with gunz'.... but wouldn't it make more sense to try something with a little more standoff potential (e.g. the AGM-88E)? It was the Desert Storm way of doing things. I think you could still get 6 TALDs underwing plus a couple AGM-88's. If you can get within 50 miles then let the AGMs loose. No need to make the face take it on the chin.
@DirtyHairy12 жыл бұрын
NATO Headquarters: "Write that down! WRITE THAT DOWN!!"
@johnvoytko24242 жыл бұрын
Scotty: my wife's thighs are like thrashers...i need it dial it back. Killing me
@johnvoytko24242 жыл бұрын
Lol..That's what i meant. Sorry drinking, laughing and texting is dangerous combination.
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
U.S. Navy VS Iranian Attack! Drone Sworm! Silkworms with Flack Guns defending and Iranian air to air F-14's protection! Iranian anti ship F-14's, Iranian UH-1H's, and Boghammars all attacking together! VS U.S. Carrier Fleet! U.S. Carrier Fleet has additional Iowa Class Battleship, Helicopters on support ships, and Human Pilots fly F-18 Super Hornet's starting in air!👍
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
22:38 wham bam thank you mam😂
@timothysalmon22592 жыл бұрын
The goat ears made me snort coffee until it came out of my eyes! Funny.
@seanpreston36532 жыл бұрын
I realize that's a take my word thing👊👊. A honest man's pillow is his peace of mind
@johnhodgson42162 жыл бұрын
I am just waiting for the 500 missile attack and 500 decoys deployed.
@theafro2 жыл бұрын
I've got a fail-proof strategy for an aircraft to get right up to an s-400 system, but it involves several hundred miles of taxiing, and looking at GR's previous history of that kind of thing, it's probably not a go-er. Maybe Matrix can get in there, like only an RAF pilot could, only climbing when he has to put his wheels down.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
lol rgr
@Stoney3K2 жыл бұрын
*attempts to taxi a combat aircraft several miles into an S-400 site* *gets overtaken on the motorway by an S-400 supply truck and some confused Russians behind the wheel.*
@theafro2 жыл бұрын
@@Stoney3K Judging by recent evidence, getting russian trucks anywhere might be more difficult than it first appears..
@HauntedXXXPancake2 жыл бұрын
B2 : "If you Navy Boys 'bout done playing grab-ass down there, I'm ready to show you what 16 times 1.2 Megatons can do, Yeeeehaw ! ... Over."
@saintuk702 жыл бұрын
This is good stuff.....just like lovely haggis and black pudding. Love it.
@schweizerluchs71462 жыл бұрын
9:45 Not entirely true. Only US Navy have retired their Legacy Hornet fleet. Legacy Hornets are still being used by the USMC. They are gonna upgrade and keep them till around 2030 in Service!
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
thx
@blueberrywilbur3152 жыл бұрын
Damn even the Russian bots got butt hurt about this🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Wintelburst2 жыл бұрын
This was very entertaining.
@zacleaning79412 жыл бұрын
I can’t wait to meat you guys at Rita
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
rgr
@timblack64222 жыл бұрын
It’s a great night!
@torjones17012 жыл бұрын
"And Pakistan has something special up their sleeve." That's an odd place to keep it...
@loganstevens24112 жыл бұрын
Cap, in regards to the US still using Legacy Hornets anymore; the USN strictly uses all Super Hornets and F-35s, but there are still a handful of USMC squadrons flying Legacy Hornets. However they are being replaced by F-35s as well.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
thx
@ohiobrian89932 жыл бұрын
As a USAF EW specialist, you are not using USAF, RAF, or NATO tactics. You start with F18 Growlers
@AB-ng7go2 жыл бұрын
and russian EW would have neutralized all your EW
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Agree BUT offensive EW not modelled in the simulation.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD2 жыл бұрын
@@AB-ng7go how does that work?
@AB-ng7go2 жыл бұрын
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD you never heard of jamming?
@ChucksSEADnDEAD2 жыл бұрын
@@AB-ng7go Jamming doesn't neutralize EW. And jamming in itself creates a beacon for missiles to switch to home-on-jam. An EA-6B was almost shot down at a training range by a F-14 Tomcat because they wanted to test the AIM-54 Phoenix on two drones while being radar jammed. The first Phoenix tracked the drone despite jamming so it worked fine. The second Phoenix detected the source of the jamming and instead of heading for the second target drone, it automatically switched to home-on-jam and started heading towards the EA-6B. They had to shut down the jammer and fly away from the area because even the inert missile would have crashed into the aircraft at supersonic speed and destroyed it.
@ziggystardink93892 жыл бұрын
Just use HIMARS. Apparently they are unable to intercept them. I have a feeling in real life the S400 is not what they say it is and DCS is WAY to powerful.
@Mystical9222 жыл бұрын
The only thing S400 shot at was by accident in Sevastopol at the air
@ser43_OLDC2 жыл бұрын
For shooting down long range rocket artillery you need systems like Tunguska, Tor, Pansirt Iron Dome cloose to the target S400 S300 and similar Sam's are desing for shooting down planes cruise misiles and similar stuff Not because they can't but just because those types of attacks are fast and ''cloose to the target'' meaning that the SAM doenst have time to react and destroy the rockets because the SAM are placed several miles far away
@Tesla340002 жыл бұрын
I think your countrymen should thank God you are not in charge of army of your country.. :)
@ziggystardink93892 жыл бұрын
@@ser43_OLDC I get that. There are articles about why the HIMARS rockets are getting thru and it is being pointed out that RU forces are depending too heavily on S300 and S400 sites to stop the rockets. The close in systems that the RU uses are not designed ( or not actually capable) of hitting the rockets. Iron Dome and CRAM were designed and have been real world proven to work in the manner you are talking about. Funny enough those systems would ending in UA LONG before RU would ever have a comparable system due to who created them.
@haythemsandel83032 жыл бұрын
Plenty of Telegram pics of HIMARS missiles shot down by Buk-M2 and Pantsirs.
@imyourdad24582 жыл бұрын
In real life scenario,they can only shoot down slow moving UAVs (like bayraktars). They couldn't defend their ship moskhva,snake island or the recent arms depot at Kherson struck by HIMARS.
@EvolvedTactical2 жыл бұрын
I loved watching this video. Lots of coordination, well executed. Congrats, even if the stupid S400 is stupid. And for the record, there are still Legacy Hornets in the US inventory. Thr Marine Corps has refused to get Super Bugs, instead waiting to eventually switch all their Hornet squadrons for Fz35s.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
thx
@ryanpayne77072 жыл бұрын
May I make a suggestion? Modern day WWII style SAS raid. Make an S400 site with its ground defenses in Arma 3. Fly either a Huey or C-130 (in DCS) as close to the S400 as you can and either land or airdrop a few vehicles. However far you are from the site in DCS is how far your insertion point is in Arma. Make your way there on the ground, demo the site, and then try to extract.
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
agreed
@Michael-rg7mx2 жыл бұрын
There was a 70's TV show about the special forces in jeeps. They had machine guns mounted on pedestal. They ran around north Africa during the first years of ww2.
@ryanpayne77072 жыл бұрын
2:42: Yes, RQ-170. And yes, anti-satellite missiles.
@jaxompol2242 жыл бұрын
harms would be good mixed in with the bogs hit from different directions even 2 extra bogs shooting would maybe tip the balence.
@raymondyee20082 жыл бұрын
“Top Gun Maverick” vibes here.
@willielinks38652 жыл бұрын
There's a channel called HypOps that shows how the US would attack a S400 site with just a basic CSG. It's a great video if you wanna check it out
@KortanaDCS2 жыл бұрын
That was a fantastic video. I honestly think we are going to have to create something of that scale to actually overwhelm the defenses.
@willielinks38652 жыл бұрын
@@KortanaDCS yeah it's fun watching y'all come up with different ways to defeat it within the limits of DCS. Only so much you can do you know. Either way it'll lose a lot of money and munitions to destroy the site
@pogo11402 жыл бұрын
Problem is that DCS does not model offensive ecm. Something that would be in full use.
@mikeck46092 жыл бұрын
Ugh. I should have read your post before I wrote it all over again
@hippoace2 жыл бұрын
Does it model defensive ECM?
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@hippoace Nope. No ECCM in dcs at all.
@mattboggs63042 жыл бұрын
Errrbody Maverick until the S-400s start flying.
@shmevan_2 жыл бұрын
Poor Simba Wimba 😢😭😢😭🤣🤣🤣
@shmevan_2 жыл бұрын
@@TeenTeenFpv 🤣🤣🤣🤣 HE'S TRYING HIS BEST!
@holdmybeer39312 жыл бұрын
Fck the long eared goat thing made me laugh😂😂😂😂
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Stop pulling those dang ears!
@seanpreston36532 жыл бұрын
And just a thought, fire half payload from one vector and half from another and at different altitude . Fire low fire high of course death mission
@trevortaylor55012 жыл бұрын
The more dangerous system is the 350, it's brand new though. Looks completely different. Fills a gap in defense.
@WhiteHatH4x0r2 жыл бұрын
That DCS skin looks amazing 😻
@mikeck46092 жыл бұрын
Maybe try again but with the Tomahawks coming from different directions? Truthfully, we would use low observable munitions like the JASM-ER for this I think. Far less time to engage. But, you use what you got. Could have used JSOWs if you had f-35s or EW support to get the f-18s close. Can the F-35 mod carry JSOW?
@schweizerluchs71462 жыл бұрын
JASSM-ER yup
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
We did test with JSOWs from hornets a few weeks ago, but S300-400 shoots them down.
@mikeck46092 жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers I’ll check it out. Did you guys use the TALDS like this time? May just not be possible without coordinated EW
@RuralSurvivalLLC2 жыл бұрын
Funniest video yet! Thank you!
@forMacguyver2 жыл бұрын
So close !
@AdamWalkLikeSuicide2 жыл бұрын
Good effort. Need more cruise missiles.
@stevenvandenbosch55282 жыл бұрын
There would be short an medium range systems spread out in the area between the site and the coast.
@vertigoalopolus2 жыл бұрын
That isnt really true. Those systems cost a lot, and need to be used to defend specific potential targets.
@stevenvandenbosch55282 жыл бұрын
@@vertigoalopolus did you have a look at the map? there"s 2 airfileds between the border and the S-400 locqtion, nevermind other army barracks.
@lohrtom2 жыл бұрын
TALDs are vastly underused in DCS
@Darthybuddy2 жыл бұрын
They were only just around a week ago for the hornets. Idk if the f-14 had them before this.
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Darthybuddy F14 has had them but they don't work great (or at least they didn't the last time I used them) only some air defenses actually interact with it and ai aircraft ignore them entirely.
@lohrtom2 жыл бұрын
@@Darthybuddy thanks. Hope to see them used more often
@muller_cj39412 жыл бұрын
Enjoy the Video but do wonder if the Russian systems are somewhat over hyped, The evidence coming from Ukraine especially about Panstir is that it is not as billed, It could not intercept Single Artillery Shells or drones over snake Island. The Ukrainians have also hit an Airbase with HIMARs M31s twice, which is protected by S400 and Panstir according to UAF.
@Rover200Power2 жыл бұрын
The S-400 was taken out, so it couldn't even protect itself.
@muller_cj39412 жыл бұрын
@@Rover200Power yes I read that but as there no good battle damage assesment to back up the claim, I am still on the fence, if it is true or one of the wartime claims
@ser43_OLDC2 жыл бұрын
All systems in DCS are overhyped
@AB-ng7go2 жыл бұрын
@@Rover200Power s400 was never taken out. stop making things up
@chrispage99732 жыл бұрын
The 16th is my birthday! Super rad!
@brianstrandberg93462 жыл бұрын
Need to do this in a hilly area so you can use terrain making to get there.
@Tomcat58372 жыл бұрын
The USMC are still using legacy hornets.
@castlekingside762 жыл бұрын
It also seems that they are useless against rockets as well. HIMARS took out 20 Russian sites in the last 48 hours. Surely some of the sites had air defense.
@cannon32672 жыл бұрын
fun videos, love watching you guys try diong it the hard way. real world war, would run a few himars up to the saudi boarder and level the place. S-400/300, as seen reciently in ukraine, are defenseless against small surface to surface rockets.
@dexlab75392 жыл бұрын
Do you have a source for your claim? I haven’t heard of any HIMARS destroying S400s. I have heard or at least 4 HIMARS being destroyed by Russia in Ukraine though!
@RuralSurvivalLLC2 жыл бұрын
Possible method to defeat S400: 1980s/1990s SLBM targeting all 10 warheads to drop at 45 mile increments in a straight line to the S400s beginning at 400 miles out.
@Stoney3K2 жыл бұрын
Obviously you could also Minuteman it from the Nevada desert. But did they even make ballistic missiles with conventional payloads? Because if they did those would really be a viable option.
@ThatSpyOutside2 жыл бұрын
It’s the real joint stick for the F-16
@michaelmcpherson54062 жыл бұрын
Love the show!
@tiadiad2 жыл бұрын
That should read: Not so topgun. 5:20 This guy drinks: 7:07
@mikesmith-wk7vy2 жыл бұрын
i think there are still quite a few legacy f18s left
@mot13ymotley552 жыл бұрын
Can't u taxi down the b roads to the target .they won't be expecting that
@M3PH112 жыл бұрын
31:38 Maybe if it's 56AD and the romans are still building the roads.
@cockatoo0102 жыл бұрын
Maybe throw some F35Cs into the mix? Now that they are starting to make their way into VFAs
@kgp19582 жыл бұрын
You forgot the VLS sub....at least 12 more thawks.
@sirnodrick2222 жыл бұрын
So, GR Meet up at RIAT. Saturday 16th July, at 10am. Where is the meeting point? RAF Fairford is a huge place.
@kenhelmers26032 жыл бұрын
Since the Tald impersonates the launch vehicle, does that mean it will imitate the F-35C?
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
hmmm invisible decoy?
@kenhelmers26032 жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers Would be interesting to see, or NOT see LOL
@Darthybuddy2 жыл бұрын
I’m sure it can be programmed for whatever you want it to be irl. So an f-35 firing off decoys could realistically impersonate a whole bomber fleet with little trouble.
@seanpreston36532 жыл бұрын
After first missiles. Good 2nd plan Capt there getting hit I think
@Unknown-th8hx2 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
Lmao you guys should have taken The F-18's in at the same time as everything else would've had better chance🙃😆
@vertigoalopolus2 жыл бұрын
They were hoping to deplete the SAM ammo, which didnt happen, so that wouldnt have helped.
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
@@vertigoalopolus lol how can you say it wouldn't help? If they would have went in at the same time as the Tomahawks and decoys they would've stood a MUCH better chance running in the way they did at the end instead of waiting for everything to be destroyed freeing up the radar's to focus solely on them a radar that can only target so many incoming ordinance/bogies. So yeah it would absolutely have helped to go in low with The Hornet's while the S-400 & or Pantsir IADS are tied up defending themselves from decoys and Tomahawks😆✌
@vertigoalopolus2 жыл бұрын
@@Anarchy_420 The point was to decoy away from the Tomahawks, not have them engaged. If they are targeted, the mission is over. Yes, with the real F18's targetable also, there would have been an improved chance. But it wouldnt be much.
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
@@vertigoalopolus I understand what your saying how that may defeat the purpose of what they were trying to accomplish or w.e, my argument was simply it would have been better for their health to have gone in undercover from everything else instead of waiting until it was all gone and then runnin in with no cover so to speak again I understand why they waited bc they were waiting for the results lol
@Anarchy_4202 жыл бұрын
@@vertigoalopolus Thank you! Lol we can agree it would have helped, just have to agree to disagree about how much it would have benefited them... They did make it kinda close ;)
@SukhoyBoy41132 жыл бұрын
Imagine S500, and the s600 is in RnD
@ChaplainDaveSparks2 жыл бұрын
I'm sure there's a flaw in my logic somewhere, but if AWACS can guide missiles to their target, why not arm AWACS with some missiles of its own? Is it a weight limitation?
@ey60082 жыл бұрын
Everything has to have an answer
@myyoutubename1522 жыл бұрын
Simulate a HIMARS attack, since apparently the S400 can't hit its GMLRS shells in the real world.
@AB-ng7go2 жыл бұрын
himars are garbage. the HIMARS have zero accuracy as they have not been able to hit a single military target, only civilian homes. hard to simulate such an attack as the HIMARS would just miss
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
rgr
@trottheblackdog2 жыл бұрын
Ich bin ein valued viewer!
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Nice
@oldfashionedwrx35742 жыл бұрын
Just use artillery against s400. Cheap drones that are cheaper than each missile. Very easy to beat with attrition. Maybe fire off HARMs that are old about to expire. Those s400 missiles are extremely expensive
@ey60082 жыл бұрын
Think outside the box is the obvious answer, a long range electronic jammer?
@lucaskulmann2 жыл бұрын
i wonder how an sr-71 would do over an sa-400 iads
@schweizerluchs71462 жыл бұрын
boom... Its not a viable option nowadays
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Tried it here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l6mjldKArJa1hWg.html
@chetnash59912 жыл бұрын
Nice idea. How many more decoys would you need to overcome the site?
@chetnash59912 жыл бұрын
Decoys cost less than jets and pilots. Time to build more
@robbarrett40382 жыл бұрын
I think you are seriously over exaggerating Russian equipment, after what's been happening in Ukraine, I think you ned to cut the capabilities of Russian equipment by about 60%, its utter crap, run without maintenance and operated by undereducated drunks
@9thsfarchangel2 жыл бұрын
Me thinks you drink too much kool-aid.
@paulwebb32422 жыл бұрын
@@9thsfarchangel I think his comment was dead on accurate. Soviet/Russian equipment has always been touted as the best. Most of it is crap and all of it is unmaintained.
@robbarrett40382 жыл бұрын
@@9thsfarchangel Really, you think?
@seanpreston36532 жыл бұрын
And my text is real time watching
@shauryasingh84472 жыл бұрын
How about a Us combined arms assault on S400 , usaf , army with himars and naval attack from sea?????
@holdmybeer39312 жыл бұрын
Is there a corruption and fizzle factor in the settings lol
@bluesfool12 жыл бұрын
Y’all needed some EF-111’s …..maybe??
@zainredding34762 жыл бұрын
Are you going to live stream the meet up?
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Neg but will make a vid.
@meltonkentjr12262 жыл бұрын
Cap, I enjoy the videos you guys (and gal, Kortana!...lol) put out and would like to see if ya'll would redo a video from a while back. The video was about the movie, "Red Dawn", which I watched as a kid. I believe that the mission debrief was considered 50/50 because The Wolverines were evacuated but the other parameters of the mission wasn't successful. Could your Team redo that mission and see if we could defeat the Reds and regain our country? Thanks a bunch!
@ey60082 жыл бұрын
A type of ray-gun to “fry” the command electronics from within?
@mikeck46092 жыл бұрын
Would an actualS-400 system have over 100 missles to be able to take down the 72 TALDS, f-18s and Tomahawks ? I don’t know much about it
@Echo4Sierra41602 жыл бұрын
An EA-18 Growler would help
@andrewsmall68342 жыл бұрын
What about the US AGM-158 JASSM against the S 400? It's a super stealthy long range cruise missile and the results would be interesting especially with multiple launched.
@Stinger5222 жыл бұрын
I don't think JASSM is in the game. Eagle Dynamics needs to get it in the game because beyond the F-22, F-35, and hypersonics, there isn't much else in the game that stands a chance against it.
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Stinger522 That's not true, the F15E. Hopefully it'll be out in the next few months and each one can carry 20 gbu39 glide bombs. That means 10 gr dudes can launch 200 glide bombs simultaneously which will 100% overwhelm this site.
@MICLakVER2 жыл бұрын
S-400 HAS HYPERSONIC MISSILE TO KILL THEM
@Stoney3K2 жыл бұрын
Probably because the specs are classified and any attempt to simulate it would just be an educated guess bordering on fiction?
@92HazelMocha2 жыл бұрын
@@Stoney3K especially true with anything "stealth" all we can really do is make complete guesses.
@Stoney3K2 жыл бұрын
Swedish pots of gold? You have to put those together yourself?
@UkDave38562 жыл бұрын
Fiendish Kortana
@FalcoGer2 жыл бұрын
Can a ground force strike defeat the s400 net? Just blow it up with indirect fire weapons
@iankphone2 жыл бұрын
Just HIMARS it. 🤣 Does DCS allow the simulation of unpaid hungry Russian conscript grunts flipping gear on ebay?
@grimreapers2 жыл бұрын
Sadly not that realistic.
@ey60082 жыл бұрын
Need as way to load ray guns onto drones, or onto a literal “swarm”
@ey60082 жыл бұрын
Can missiles be built inside missiles just as cluster bombs so they can swamp the areas defence