Yea ur definitely right, I didn’t focus on doing that enough. I thought just throwing it a short distance (like 10ft ish) onto my couch was good enough. I should really prepare a lot beforehand.

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ in the end you got a great result and that is all that matters! The video premise, content, editing and execution was great! so dont beat yourself up

Thank you. I really appreciate you.

Referred to HR, don't worry I told them instead

I won´t

he is doing it and throwing it the wrong way. A propeller pulls air from behind and a plane flies by moving forward. because he is doing it backwards and inverting the plane position, it won't fly, since the direction of flight is opposite of where it should it be (forward).

@@davidwarda5616 tf are you yapping about? Reported for spam for being a bot

@@Mr3344555 screw you for doing this

Why thank you for letting me know there’s a rest above me. I’ll be sure to move out of the way. Have an amazing day!

😂😂😂😂​@@_BL4CKB1RD_

Oh yeah huh, that probably added to some instability.

@@IndraKurniawan-vk2qb Dang, I must have improved my video editing skills quite a lot then, thanks!

Gotchu! 😆

@@aedanludwig4065 thx bro!

I just followed what the “AI” said when building it. It in fact was elevon control, yet ur right how my control surfaces were too small. The more I learn, thx for the tips.

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ but you're welcome, it's so encouraging to see young people coming into the hobby. What's funny is that the design proposed by the AI ​​is from a strictly theoretical point of view the best but it is also from a practical point of view the most difficult to implement. This is the reason why no aircraft manufacturer offers this type of design. To give you an idea take a look at an aircraft called the Grumman X-29.or at the Soukhoï Su-47 Berkout its Russian equivalent It took three computers to make it fly because it was so unstable!!!! But on the other hand it had incredible flight characteristics, particularly at large angles of attack if you are interested FLYTEST has made a DIY version which flies very well and whose plans are free (which has become very rare for them) look in their playlist. Good flights to you and hello from France

That’s fascinating. I bet it was cool seeing technology advance, making this hobby more accessible and more possibilities.

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ Yes of course it is. Unfortunately 5 years ago Iost all my old stuff, due to a divorce. Fortunately, the only thing they cannot steal away is what you have between your two ears…

@@paulbrouyere1735 Thanks for sharing that, I’m glad I could rekindle a fond part of your memories. I hope you have a nice rest of your day.

Kevin!

@@_BL4CKB1RD_yes?

@@kevintieman3616 Hai!

@@sirashley2355 I’m still learning, thanks for your feedback. I am always trying to improve and viewers like you help!

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ nah, it's fine brother. Keep it up. Congrats on the channel growth

@@sirashley2355 👍

@@Physicsless8 huhh, I guess I should probably invest in a mic 🎙️, any good low budget recommendations?

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ lmao my speakers were tripping at first when i wrote the comment, lol my bad... btw i wanted to ask, what was that material you used for the plane? i kinda wanted to try to make my own

@@Physicsless8 No problem at all. It's just foamboard from my local Dollar Tree. It's a superb material. Very lightweight, and cheap to repair! I learned how to work with the material through watching (old) FliteTest vids and tutorials. I hope you build some wonderful airplanes :D

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ Yo, thank you so much lol, I've kinda wanted to do this for a while and this just gave me that kick I needed!

I agree!

So fast!

Better to over-engineer than to under-engineer.

@@hugofpv1 Nuh uh, I’ve definitely stepped up the difficulty in locating the duck by a large margin compared to my last video. Have a fun challenge finding him!

It was cool. Sparked some excitement for their lil picnic party 😊

🗿

Problem is that they are in the front of the center, they shoud be on the back half of the aircraft. In front they crate instability and over reaction to inputs.

@@ljubomirculibrk4097 That's a good point, too, but I think a slightly different problem. The angle of the vertical stabs is an issue no matter where they are. Go back to the thought experiment in the video and imagine the stabs angled the other way. I think you'll see what I mean. (This is all predicated on my impression that the leading edge of the stabilizer was outboard of the trailing edge. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.)

@@skyslycer Here’s a lil secret: It’s not actually backwards. 😏 Most airplanes ya know have the propeller at the front right? That’s what’s called a “tractor” configuration, where it “pulls” air in front of it. Very few airplanes, like the J7W Shinden or Piaggio P.180 Avanti, have a “pusher” configuration, where they “push” air behind it. They are known for having the propeller at the back. So let’s talk about these funky ahh wings. This plane has “forward-swept” wings, a configuration that has the wings angled forwards. This is opposite from regular swept wings found on like the F86 Sabre or P6M Seamaster. In reality, they only offer advantages at very high airspeeds (favorable stall characteristics) and notable examples of planes that use it are the Grumman X29 and the Sukhoi Su-47. TLDR: There’s no single way to design an airplane.

@@stevennagley3407 indeed, there are similarities.

@@DimitriSokolyuk AI will never replace the creativity and ingenuity of us humans.

It has it, but I am just amateur pianist and forgo to actually use it.

@@Randomhobbies12 IT DOES! It’s just the editing program I use (curse you Adobe) gets buggy sometimes. Otherwise the footage from the drone was crisp.

It's a pretty suspicious character.

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ Yes, it is. It is only used in a few words. Although I am Sinhalese, I only know two words as well.😁

@@atrav477 oh that’s neat!

@@malakibluntDon’t judge it. It’s doing its own thing. Just cause it looks a lil different doesn’t mean it doesn’t have feelings too. I’m just playing. This sort of configuration may appear to be flying backwards, but that’s just how it rolls. Most planes you see everywhere have what’s called a “tractor” configuration where the propeller is in the front, as if the prop pulls the plane forwards. Some more unique planes (like the one you mention) have a “pusher” configuration, where the propeller is at the back. The wings are like the opposite of many jet fighters you see. Instead of being angled or “swept” backwards towards the rear, they are “forward-swept”. A highly unconventional design, yet it has been experimented on pretty scarcely. An example being NASA’s X-29 plane. tldr: there’s a lot of ways to design a plane.

@@_BL4CKB1RD_ sorry English humour. I have made a two meter model of the Rutan Model 77 Solitaire. And was obsessed with the X 29 as a kid. And have made several swept wing tailless F5b and F5D models.

To be honest, it’s not even a true AI, it’s just a language model, trained to predict the best response to a prompt. Like a parrot with infinite vocabulary, it doesn’t understand what it’s saying. It just mimics. Still, it was interesting to see what amalgamation it came up with.

Too expensive for current me. 😔