exactly

The second one is also a chinese company.

@@nasar_paid_agent Basically China has the entire supply chain of drones and captures over 90% of the global marketshare (civilian market). while the US has a few hand craft workshops like the one in the video.

but if you talking about number above same tech level we can produce 10 million drone in war time only at one province by the way we have serval provinces have reach such amount. So no more slow war like russian and ukrian we can arrange 100 drone for every enemy single solider. Its a such cheap way to go to war.

❤

no one believes western media's narratives

because incompetency.

craigslist

all western media are funded by cia.

That's what the mega rich, for example top-class Jews in USA, want.

Alright, how we gonna do that? Wish upon a star?

​@@alst4817tell the US to stop invading and overthrowing other countries

​@@alst4817countries can't go to war if the soldiers refuse to fight.

@@wedmundsstop living in fantasy land and acknowledge reality 😂

at least better than wsj's expert

​@LeoLiu-md6msLeoLiu-md6ms, the US was the previous world's factory before china and had 50 percent share of global manufacturing in the year 1950 so why you're saying "mission impossible" ?

the EW battle needs to be won...that means blocking the drones with EW tech

China installed more new industrial robots in just the last 12 month than the total number of industrial robots in the US, and it's accelerating at >7% YoY China also consumes more electrical power than the next 5 countries combined, that is US + India + Russia + Japan + Brazil. China just added more solar, just solar, in the last 12 month than the total power generation of Germany, more wind than the total generation of UK, and China's solar production capacity just reached 1x total US power generation per year. China is approaching Type 1 civilization, US is nowhere even remotely near the same league, financial services might give you GDP, but its not real industry.

Nur wenn China stärker wird, können die in Gefangenschaft gehaltetenen Sattelitenstaaten des US Imperiums wieder suverän werden. Trau niemals einer Klapperschlange. hegemonia punkt deutschland

​@@vlhc4642China is incredibly unproductive. They use three times the amount of energy and six times the amount of labor to produce the same value. China about to enter their lost decade like Japan did in the 90s. You can already see the signs with deflation, youth unemployment, and collapsing real estate prices.

What is EW?

@@kruzedarling9347 Electronic warfare. Basically if you can kill the signal between the operator and the drone, you can limit the drone's capbility. Unless of course the drone is fully autonomous.

@@TheStrangeBloke don't forget about emp, ghost fleet is a good book about different scenarios - worth a read but in any case we should looks for ways to work with china - that probably won't happen until regime change but it would be good for us and china as well #entrenched special interests #michael faraday

​@@TheStrangeBloke​@TheStrangeBloke a lot of things can be done and jamming is just one of them. You can jam the communication signal from operator/controller to drone, jam gps signal, you can also spoof gps signal, go man-in-the-middle to highjack the drone ... And this list is not exhaustive. Concerning China industrial advantages, it won't be easy to beat, they have succeeded in being autonomous and very fast in R&D while America was being industrialized (in the name of profit for a few), they have the fastest computers, they even have 6G Internet, the only "cheap" HD IR payloads are from InfiRay, not FLIR, they have mastered maths and computing ... It's never too late I guess, but it's still very late, they have plundered U.S. technology for so long (and they are not the only ones) that America's fantastic technological edge is almost nullified. And with the woke atmosphere and the hidden drive to turn America into a socialist utopia populated with youngsters who firmly turned their back on science, I don't see how the great America of yore can come back frontstage. Just check how the US is struggling to provide federal agencies with drones, none of the american drones can do what chinese ones (Dji, Autel) are capable of at an affordable price point. The industrial capability is simply not there. America has very advanced military research, but the link to commercial application is more difficult than in China where the CCP is in charge of EVERYTHING, even commercial companies are part CCP endeavours!

china have quantum communication tech. chinese has invented very cheap and small (semiconductor)chip gyroscope for missiles and drones. EW is useless for chinese drones.

You can’t just launch millions of drones they require drone operators and need to be in a certain range

where money come from? u know how many campers inside big country?

first write off Taiwan from map and second write off..............

USA doesn’t have the infrastructure to compete with China anymore

isn’t it more like China will build 10 million drones? 😂

Not a fan of the crossed arms. What is she signaling with that?

Female national security reporters always have strong manly faces. 😂

If you can't build them in numbers you're just building hobby RC planes

@ejefepinnock945 😂 not ask and learn

@judetravers 😂

One word Media

No but surely they have sense

Can't do it yourself? Getting SKorea involved may force China to do likewise with NKorea. The reason SKorea went back on their proposed arms shipment to Ukraine,is Russia's threat to arm their northern cousins likewise.

The consequence is that North Korea will produce hypersonic missiles and stealth fighters

It's quite unrealistic to imagine SK joining a conflict with China, yes they have bad relations in almost every aspect, but fighting your biggest trading partner doesn't sound like the smartest thing to do

@@raymondli4315 If war breaks out SK won't have a choice. At that point SK will be either join the US or have to be under China's influence. I know SK does not want to depend on the CCPs good will. Basically, with the US out, China controls the regions and decides what is ok and what isn't. That isn't a good thing for South Korea. What you say only makes sense in peacetime.

@@rickjames18 You're guessing SK's opinions from American's POV, could you be right? Maybe, but highly unlikely. And the presumption of "won't have a choice" doesn't exist in the geopolitical landscape.

Millions go homeless too.

@@nmew6926US liberal democracy doesn’t care about its people

for 10x the price, sure. China would be willing to sell 1 million of those to the US. The catch? Auto landing when approaching the chinese border.

Taiwan Independence means WAR!

China actually have orbital bombers and actually have laser linked video surveillance constellation with AI target detection (look up Jilin-1 on KZfaq)

“Besides of Drone swarm” -- should add this at the front @@vlhc4642

absolutely right

Or vs Germany in quantity of Tanks/Planes in WW2

Its definitely a little different now, weapons and especially ships are so advanced they can take years to build correctly that they can't be pumped out quick enough to supplement losses, I have been under the impression for awhile that any future naval war will only be fought with what was built or in the process of being built when it comes to modern warships

Yes you do have a point, Chinas manufacturing capacity is just to great. They’re about 5x the size of the U.S., theirs no way that we can match it. But I think that the comparison is still wrong. It’s not china vs. the U.S., rather china vs U.S., Japan, South Korea, Australia, etc. and also the sophistication of technology will also hamper the amount of production scale, for every 1 the U.S. builds maybe 3-5 the Chinese might build, but that’s just the U.S. by itself.

​@@jamarplunkett3283China's industrial output is larger than that of the United States and Europe combined, and its shipbuilding capacity is hundreds of times that of the United States (70 percent of the world's total). At the same time, China has a monopoly on the most critical materials used in weapons manufacturing, including tungsten and gallium (which the United States buys from China). In fact, after China stopped exporting gallium, the United States delayed the manufacture of the f35, because now the United States must extract gallium from scrap to produce high-end radar.

Only games like us think that. Not 50 year old white Generals in the Pentagon

“EMP” weapons is so vague you probably have no idea what your talking about basing it purely off movies and video games

just a small question, how do you ensure that your EMP device does not knock out friendly electronic devices. and if you’re thinking of making the EMP device directional, well then you’ve have an issue of range and cost. conventional directional arms are way cheaper and have more range

​@@erlend6338emp weapons are being used on the battlefield in the russo ukranian war. It's obvious you are the one who doesn't know.

​@@CrimsonAlchemist You mean "gamers"?

DJI is a private company headquartered in Shenzhen, China.

Just a joke!china is not Russia !!!

So how is Ukraine doing lately?

What about helping Israel win? What will that shine a light on?

🤣

Too late Its stalemate now . Ukraine has an average age of 45 fighting the war now. Not good

这种工厂都是ITAR的, 需要security clearance.

There is no competition, America doesn't have enough industry to qualify.

Yes. America will have a perfect excuse for everything - we have the right to defend ourselves

Well that’s wat your govt wants death of ppl while profiting the military industrial complex that’s y they r trying so hard to make this invasion possible they don’t care abt Taiwan no not at all and never will they care abt them all they want is a fat defense budget

Alliance countries are groups formed for mutual benefit. When an alliance is perceived as not being beneficial, they will sever the alliance. If aligning with China is deemed more advantageous, they will form an alliance with China.

@@user-et1vi6jo3w if china were to attack U.S. bases, they would have too on Japanese and Korean soil. Bringing both nations into the conflict. And Japan’s and Korea’s alliance is advantageous, because the bigger threat in the South Pacific is china. Chinas goals is not to make friends, it’s to achieve what they want and see who will allow them too.

@@jamarplunkett3283 Your scenario is truly ingenious.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@user-et1vi6jo3w lol 😂 bro what are you going on about? Where are the U.S. military bases in the region? It’s not even that hard to understand.🤣😂 so much Chinese bots in a comment section on an American app, commenting on a post by an American company.🤣😂 The irony.😂🤣😅😂🤣

Great subversive sarcasm, Comrade Waffle. 5 Social Credit points for you.

The WSJ promotes war with China with constant “Yellow Peril” rhetoric.

whatever available to the media are open information. If you think the Chinese intelligence department would be impressed by a youtube video, you don't know much about intelligence.

correction: about 3 million at 2023.

This is how they start making up reasons (excuses?) and then money. Whenever an election coming up, politicians must make up some problems that better miles away because so you won’t be confronted at your door steps. Easy.

Because they still have the Cold war mindset, anything that is pro-citizens or pro-civilian and not pro-corporation is COMMUNISM.

because US is a warlord, warlord doesn't build, it robs.

I think what you're saying is more suitable for describing the United States.

You first. Stop wasting billions building fake islands when you can’t even build real tolets

China's military equipment and weaonry are junk, ask Nigeria, Myanmar, Paksitan and any country that was a customer of those junks, they will tell you the same: *Pakistan* inducted *Chinese multi-role frigates* as part of their efforts to strengthen its sea frontiers, however, *these frigates are giving jitters to the Pakistani Navy due to the defective critical components and poor service* from Chinese manufacturers. *Di Valerio Fabbri, writing in Geopolitica.* said that these have forced the Pakistani Navy to operate these frigates with degraded operational capabilities, compromising some of the key mission objectives with which these ships were bought at a high price. After the commissioning of the frigates, the Pakistani Navy found out that *the onboard imaging device of the FM90 (N) missile system was defective because of a faulty indication on display,* reported Geopolitica. *The system was unable to lock on to the target* which, in a way, *made the missiles ineffective,* thereby defeating one of the critical mission objectives. As it turned out, these ships were found to be equipped with a *defective infra-red sensor (IR17) system and SR 60 radars, two of the most important sensors on board,* which are used for air and surface search. These search and track radars were found to exhibit faults during high-power transmissions, substantially degrading their operational utility. *The IR 17 sensors on all the ships were found to be defective and had to be discarded,* with the replacement yet to be fitted, reported Geopolitica. Another set of common faults in the Chinese-built frigates was found in its main engines. These frigates are powered by four diesel engines. *A critical engine defect has been low engine speed caused by high turbocharger exhaust temperatures, especially in engines 3 and 4, on all the frigates,* said Fabbri. *A high degree of degradation was noticed in the engine crankcase and liner* which undermined the coolant chemistry in the ships. Lube oil degradation and deterioration of vibration isolators were some other faults in the engines. There were other specific deficiencies in different ships. *PNS Aslat, for instance, exhibited poor radar performance. The ASO-94 Sonar system on Aslat was erratic in its performance* and on inspection it was found it was caused by faulty computing units. Likewise, *Aslat’s SR-47 BG Search Radar was below par in performance and repairs were carried out with cannibalised parts from other F22P ships.* The frigate developed a serious snag during an operational deployment in the Gulf of Aden, reported Geopolitica. *An equally serious deficiency noticed in PNS Zulfiqar,* the first Chinese frigate to be commissioned, was the NG 16 single barrel 76mm gun mounted on it. *The gun, equipped to engage other ships and aircraft and defend against anti-ship missiles, developed numerous faults in the mechanical and electrical parts,* severely limiting its utility. Meanwhile, *PNS Saif has been running with a problematic HP5 stabiliser gyro* since its commissioning. *A gyroscopic fin stabilizer, found on both sides of a ship’s hull, prevents excess rolling of a ship, in either direction."*

lol

Wow that's not discriminatory. Also probably a bot? It's just copy paste spam.

Do you even know history?