Yes!

You are spot on. This liberal narrative just makes my skin crawl. These ppl want to choke out the plantlife on this earth. The very thing that needs and will regulate the CO2 they will kill killing mankind. Western society will implode and all the rest of the countries that watched it happen will laugh and take us over. Russia, China and many many countries are not on this sky is falling bs. They will be the survivors not the west that are stifling the farmers, killing their animals, don't fertilize the crops, eat bugs, meat is evil. Getting Conservatives back in for 20 years can't reverse the damage liberals have done

The problem is trees are not built and patented by companies, but these machineries are

I'm sorry sir or person the ONLY way to fix this is to STOP this insane notion that we must save capitalism free market system at all cost will cost us the planet you simply cannot have continued growth & consumerism on a planet with finite natural resources and anyone who tells you we can fix this with spraying acid or sulfur in the atmosphere is 100% telling you pure falsehoods we have monkey fucked this planet to death in the geologic blink of an eye . Bravo well played congratulations to the Robber Barons & the titans of industry while you certainly amassed great family fortunes you did so at great cost to the overall planet bravo sir maybe you can eat your money when we can no longer grow food....

Exactly what I was thinking about. All the areas that have been deforestated must be replanted with new trees (especially the Amazon forest). Cities will also need trees in their streets and lots of parks to make up for the space taken by cities (look at Mexico city for example)

All we have to do is plant more trees!

Deforestation is caused by eating animals. We're responsible for climate change, we can stop it.

100 years ago there were 6 trillion trees on the planet, today there are 3 trillion. One trillion trees consumes 200 gigatons of carbon. Planting trees might not be the only solution, but we should absolutely be replanting some of those trillions or trees we’ve removed.

@@brianshorey Planting other carbon eaters is good too. Some kinds of hay eat more CO2 than it gives off when burned. Rainforests are possible on small scales over 10 years as one guy has done.

Ten percent of the Amazonas max is lost to feed the planet's population. Overall, the woodlands of Earth have grown by 70% compared to the woodlands of 16-17 hundred. The Earth is getting greener. We have been using coal, oil, and gas, lately nuclear instead of as before, wood and dung.

Although I agree with what Finland is doing, try explaining that to a typical American.

​@@fitveganathleteintegrateda1695snow is more reflective than forests. Professional Discourse is not looking for more trees

Really their is no correlation of co2 and global warming so stop talking rubbish 😅

We could do all of this... Bankrupt the planet, eat crickets, and live like cave dwellers. It would not change the energy output of the Sun one iota.

The problem is we keep adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and a change of 0.03% to 0.04% doesn't seem like that much of a change Until you realize that that is over a 33% change.

We've been teaching the "3rd world" to be more like us over the past century or so... ... ...obscene consumers and devourers...

@@craigb8228 The problem is the temp isn't going up. NASA data shows it's volcanoes under the ice shelves heating the water and our global temps are actually lower now than in 1896. We may be actually saving ourselves from an ice age. Who knows? Data rules.

The lifestyle of the top 10% of wealthiest people is generating 90% of the global emissions. Problem is they are the majority investors in new techs and they will fund only R&D projects that will promise them no change in their lifestyle.

No I live in Hawaii also, the Sun has actually turned white over the last 10 Years. It’s getting colder at Night and Hotter during the day, depending on which island you live on. But the temperatures are changing everywhere. The Truth is, the Poles are shifting on its Axis and has been for years as Fukushima is the Biggie for Radiation that is also a problem. But we can tell that Non Humans Don’t Know the Meaning of the Hawaii Word Aloha🤙🏾 Which Means Respect for Others you Don’t Know🖖

@Levvis Balhare in what way?

Gutmy 5th

Ironically Hawaii has the second coldest maximum recorded temperature of any US state. Only Alaska hasn't got hotter than Hawaii

Trees? Stupid idea. Phytoplankton in the oceans remove CO2 from the atmosphere. How about we breed more efficient Phytoplankton? Problem is... too much and we all die.

I was thinking the same thing, we are reinventing the wheel a bit. Nature figured out how to balance co2 a long time ago. Trees and algae are the best way to go. Grow them and burry them deep, than Grow some more, rinse and repeat..

@Chris Townsend agreed that plants need CO2 but if it gets too hot plants shrivel and die!

Goverments around the World need to put pressure on Brasil to stop cutting down so much trees & help them with the ilegal forest tree cutting.. They are destruing the lungs of the planet at a scary rate...They do nothing cuz of greed & power, plus that nazi trump president they have down there that he is just like trump does'nt care about others,the future, climate, just money & power.. Hope that (LULA) wins the presidentual election down there.. I think that we are f****d it's just going to get out of control soon, underground for humans, back to caves...😉🤣

We need to save trees!

Yeah, well think of them as toilet paper, books, newspapers, houses, furniture, etc! There's lots to love!!

Uhhh, nuclear power literally denigrates your entire dopey post. Yikes

Climate change has been happening ever since this planet was formed

Then, Humans will become extinct. Then, the Earth will recover and the remaining Animals will have good cheer and clean Water and Air.

@@DonZenOfficial We have an incredible amount of nuclear waste all over Earth. That was a bad idea, eh?

Yup. Growth equals increased cosumption, quanity over quality

This will not have that large impact on climate change.

corn is actually more effective in converting co2 to o2 and most plants including trees only convert co2 too o2 during the day at night they emit co2 so if you want to plant trees to store carbon you're going to want to plant natural grown slow growth trees like cedar and redwoods and stay away from fast growing hybrids and grafted trees as they tend to break easily and are more prone to disease/pests

The only way it’s getting rid of by burning fuel and chemicals, we are in that world where we are even eating those chemicals every day called medicines. Produced in Factory, think just what Factories are causing to this planet, we are making same to our Bodies. Good luck guys.

Great to see folks are at least trying.

Yeah, that would be a quite stupid thing to do. What these idiots don’t understand is unintended consequences. We’re much more likely to slip into another ice age. We are not even at the historical optimum high average temp, cooling would make it very difficult to grow food in many northern latitudes. Just stop polluting and we’ll be fine. But, those who scream the loudest do the least when it comes to solutions.

Jimmy Fishburn, Thank you for posting this comment. Step one in creating a desert is deforestation. This happened to my neighborhood over the last 30 years. The pattern goes on and on. People move into a heavily wooded community, cut their trees down, put in grass lawns and the result is a community of houses with yards of dead brown grass most of the year due to draught and winter weather. Attempting to maintain a grass lawn is costly (about $60.00 a month) but is also impossible because the grass is quickly invaded with weeds that choke out the grass. In about one year yards that were initially seeded with grass are about 90% weeds. When the $60.00 a month is added to a $400.00 a month increase in their electric bill the economics make no sense. Due to lawn care costs plus the increase in electric bills to run their air conditioners, the cost of replacing a zero maintenance forested lot with a grass lawn averages out to about $5500.00 a year. Putting that same $5500.00 a year into a ROTH IRA INDEX FUND averaging 10"% interest per year over 30 years, would give the homeowner a tax free retirement nest egg of $995,188.84. Instead of this, most of my neighbors stripped the trees off of their property, put in lawns, and after years of trying to impress people with their lawns, ended up old and broke. Please read my comment under Post Hole Digger. PHD

You are a benefit to the planet.

Where the hell did you get the info that "rich people are buying up land stripping it bare and leaving it that way"...that's total bullshit

@@douglashanlon1975 Billionaires and big corporations are buying up cropland all over the world right now.

If only if only the world would follow your example. Cars replaceable but technology is repressed

Every method helps.

I like this idea 👍🏽

It's actually shown in Wienna at Hundertwassers Building. Google it.

Nice idea. The concrete needed tho’ a garden roof has to support a big load.

As in Japan roof top Gardens

and when they crush the rocks to make small pieces the co2 is released

It probably will, just like electric cars are considered "green" even though they ultimately have mega expensive toxic batteries that are charged by plugging into the electric grid and therefore run on coal and gas..

@@realtorjames2586 That's true but the goal is to get the electrical grid green with renewables..

Not if the energy is from nuclear power. Better yet is to use improved reactors like the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor that addresses the problems of current reactors by not producing long-lived nuclear waste, producing a lot less nuclear waste, having no risk of meltdowns and being useless for making nuclear bombs. The fuel thorium is also abundant and currently a by product of mining rare earth metals. The youtube channel Gordon McDowell has a lot of videos on this type of reactor.

@Just Doit Absolutely not. That's a ridiculous assertion.

97% climate consensus was faked by an Australian even the IPCC says no increase in storms or severe weather events for 20years so why do people fall for this its a scam to generate money

@@yfelwulf they dont know how to think for themselves if CNN told them to eat their own turds to prevent climate change and become immune to to covid "how to season your turd" would be trending.

Found the russian bots @yfulwulf @brainwashing detergent.

Do you include shutting down all power plants that use natural gas? Or do you exclude the one action that we can do right now, because it has "problems".

Antinatalism.

I had teachers that nurtured free thought, they were great. Remember the ozone layer

Any effort put it in by you or anyone else around the world, planting these trees, wouldn’t amount to 0.0000000001% of the goal you would need to get to, to make this worth while. Stop wasting your time.

@@olivercox2565 the last thing we need is doomerism

Very little is being said about the two obvious major contributing factors of global warming: human overpopulation and deforestation of the planet. Reversal of these trends is needed. Expansion of Earths forests could reduce CO2 without more energy consumption involved in others proposed solutions which only address the results but not the root causes of global warming.

I hate to be a Debby Downer, but James Hansen et al (2013) estimated that reforestation would only be able to recapture about 100 Gt of carbon, whereas we are emitting roughly 12 Gt C per year, so a global reforestation project would only capture 8 years of our current emissions. The only solution is to STOP burning fossil fuels as fast as possible. Every country needs to create a plan to get to 100% renewable energy in 15 years and to get to net zero emissions in 25 years time. In the US, that means defeating the Republicans in every election and holding the Corporate Democrats feet to the fire.

Yes, Bamboo trees are fantastic, and it’s amazing what all the cool things can be built from this type of sturdy wood.

No offense but those solution are about 40 to 50 years too late....the patient has Ebola and we are trying to treat it with aspirin.

We have learned the hard way that sealing buildings tight and riding crowded buses are great ways to spread COVID and other respiratory infections. There is a real conflict between measures to fight global warming vs. measures to fight respiratory pandemics.

@@stevenlitvintchouk3131 Boy have you got that right...I work in the HVAC industry testing systems and buildings. We test the building envelop to ensure it not letting unconditioned air in or condition air out...and now because of COVID a lot of buildings HVAC systems is starting 4 hours before the building is occupied. The system operates at 100% outside air to flush out the building...this is done regardless of the outside air temperature, adding up to a third more energy usage...It's really nuts.

Probably not.

Chana and India have planted enough trees to cover the entire United States. So, yes it is possible. Technology is our allies, not our enemy. Nuclear will be an integral part if we wish to keep our industry from killing large portions of our population.

@@spacescatatford China and India also put out enough pollution to dwarf the US's liability in this. The only reason climate change isn't being addressed en masse, is because this is a democracy, and the average person does not trust climate change activists, with the constant moving of the goalposts, debunked studies, and oddly political "solutions" for things that aren't even a problem. 1) Like the rise of the global temperature, which is well within in past geothermal activity on Earth 2) The absolute refusal to focus on nuclear energy, which is both clean AND efficient in favor of pushing inefficient industries that they, and all their favorite politicians are invested in 3) The bizarre focus of attention on the US to do something about it, when China and India pollute way more than us, and would be ecstatic for any measure that would cripple our economy, like maybe mandating ineffective energy sources.

@@Phatnaru0002 "1) Like the rise of the global temperature, which is well within in past geothermal activity on Earth" The interglacial maximum occurred 7,000 years ago. Since then we've been gradually cooling down despite cutting forests and farming releasing massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere for the last 10,000 years, prior to the industrial revolution, which began about 1760. It took about 170 years to gain about 1-degree Fahrenheit and another 30 years to gain another 1-degree Fahrenheit. At the same time, starting in 1993, sea-level rise increased substantially. Even though James Hansen of NASA had testified to congress was a little overboard, his predictions of extreme weather are clearly coming true. You'd have to be either downright stupid or have your head buried in the sand to believe otherwise unless you are getting a paycheck from the fossil fuel industry. "2) The absolute refusal to focus on nuclear energy, which is both clean AND efficient in favor of pushing inefficient industries that they, and all their favorite politicians are invested in" I totally agree. "3) The bizarre focus of attention on the US to do something about it, when China and India pollute way more than us, and would be ecstatic for any measure that would cripple our economy, like maybe mandating ineffective energy sources." Untrue. Solar and wind go hand in hand with 4th generation nuclear. This is the cheapest way forward. It would cost about 15 trillion to run strictly solar and wind with batteries, about 3 trillion to go with molten salt reactors and about 20% less than that to run a hybrid grid. Germany vs France is the test case we needed to know.

@@spacescatatford 1) You need to look further back. Roughly 800k years back by historical temperature measures. I recommend checking the data and research of Dr. Carolyn Snyder, graduate of Stanford, Assistant for Energy Efficiency in the US department of Energy, and one of the leading recognized names in climate science. We have reached, and far exceeded this global temperature at least 7 times in the last 800k years. 2) Glad we agree 3) This is literally the first I've heard about this solar/wind + nuclear hybrid being effective. I'd need to see more on it first. Where did you hear about this from. Sounds like another theory, which I take with a grain of salt considering wind and solar's track-record for efficiency.

Never heard of this. Greening Sahara made me think of it got hot enough to push into Stratosphere? Creates vacuum sucking up African and Med humidity causing rain Eventually Sahara gets green and warms earth tho.

You have NO future, only mindless delusions coming from a warped mind. Grow up. Humans have destroyed the earth. Our course is set.

Covid was a temporary 7% global drop in C02 emissions, so back to 2019 levels before increasing again the next year. Methane and N02 are trending higher. The only other reduction since WW2 was 2009 by 1.9%. In other words, green house gas emissions are correlated to GDP. However, the clear air from less industry actually increased solar radiation reaching earth, while the many forest fires increased C02 emissions from natural sinks. This proves that effort and goals are not outcomes, it’s more like playing make believe.

That's because the lack of jet exhaust mainly. it has nothing to do with us land dwellers

We need to run

the big companies working on these projects cant make any money back doing it that way

@@Grandassets Which companies are those?

if the oceans had normal levels of plankton as well

They need to go after China

@@christopherabraham9121 Cannot do that ! Then they could not get rich off of the cheap crap the make for them . Oh China owns most of them !

Let me preface by saying I'm not a climate denier and global warming is real. There is a battle of sciences between alarmists and deniers and everyone thinks they need to pick a side. Both sides are both right and wrong. The earth is warming due to human activity, so the alarmists are correct. However, the earth has had far higher c02 levels in the atmosphere in its history and didn't heat up the planet. Many of the high c02 eras were even during ice ages. The real problem is humans have spent thousands of years desertifying the planet. If you look at ancient civilizations, all of them (except those in tropical areas) are located in deserts. Since civilization would not and could not have began in the deserts, we know that they were once green lush lands. Civilizations cleared the lands and diverted rain water away which ,in time, turned the lands to desert. We are still doing this today on a global scale. Once the soil dries vegetation dies out the land becomes desertified. Then we dig wells for water. Once the ground water dries, we dig bore wells. Once the aquifers are dry, we move to a different location. We need to stop rain from leaving the land, and allow it to soak into the ground. This allows vegetation to cover the ground and cool the climate. In nature, rain water never makes it to rivers and streams unless the ground is already saturated. Rivers and streams should almost always be caused from ground water seeping into them.

@@IowaKeith I get it. I know that the fractional CO² increase is there, but that C0² only exerts 4% *effect* in the overall weather patterns. It is a fraction of a fraction. I think we could solve for other problems while solving for global warming concerns. Methane harvesting is one as it solves several problems for people in developing countries. I agree with Walter Jehne's three prong approach where we: 1) Greatly increase rainwater harvesting earthworks, curbcuts, and bioswales for flood mitigation, hydration of water tables, bringing back river, regreening especially with trees, reducing power grid strain by reducing the need to pump as much water, decentralizing water (adding to water accessibility), etc. 2) Planting site-appropriate trees to restore nature, increase food for people, as well as providing another foods ourselves for livestock and wildlife; additional transpiration; cooling of heat island effects; to preserve paving; making cities walkable and bikable again; water pollution reduction; etc. 3) Rebuilding soil health. When you rebuild soil you are naturally adding soil carbon, increasing plant growth, infiltrating more water into the soil, etc. You are reducing entropic cycles and replacing them with ones that are exponentially more efficient recapture cycles. I think we are largely in agreement regarding your statement.

@@IowaKeith Btw your comment appears in my feed, but is missing from the actual comment section. YT has made your comment 'for my eyes only'...

@@b_uppy YT giving us our privacy i guess. Lol

@@IowaKeith Yup, lol.

That's not the worst idea really.

Please be more specific than "chill."

Nice 👍🏻

Wtf 😂

I been saying

Trees .. 1 per person

@@videosaala I agree.

"MAKE MORE BABIES" was not emphasized, because, "MAKE MORE BABIES."

i think this one may be self explanitory. maybe the first step is self educating on the things in your life that generate greenhouse gases like co2 and methane. perhaps once you know, easy and obvious solutions will start becoming obvious. for me, i live close to work, lets cut back my trips to work via car, with something more sustainable, and it also gives me excercise. another one is my diet. cows produce heeps of methane, which is 10 times worse then co2 as far as greenhouse gases are concerned. perhaps maybe finding ways to cut your meat intake, and try to incorporate foods into your diet that you have grown. its very rewarding and much healthier of an alternative then dead produce from the supermarket. i think the key is anything you can do sustainably

@@p-san Maybe we should genetically engineers our cows so they produce less unwanted gases! How rude of them!

There is no single solution. Your point has weight, but it's not enough. We can do it, but the solution is multi-faceted.

There just isnt enough lsnd on earth. Algae aquaculture...

@@jonaspiva41 In other words, there are too darn many humans.

@@Vector_Ze please research into hemp

@@jeremymabbun157 Hemp is great for many things! But, it doesn't factor into CO₂ control any more than corn does.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n6dna5um2L-yh3U.html Perhaps this explains it all...and maybe we should boss with things to much...

We'll be able to inhabit Africa if we reduce the suns effect. Many resources there.

They say they reduce sunlight but in reality they are poisoning the earth and us with barium, aluminum particles, other toxins and viruses. Don't believe that everything you see on TV (not even on PBS) tells you the truth. Just look at the skies and notice the amount of airplanes leaving grids of chemicals......see what comes off your windows when you clean. Programs like these are partially just to make you believe that what they are doing is to safe the earth but it's mostly to justify taking away freedom with carbon credit systems while killing people by spraying junk with airplanes.

@@bretttyler1010 You drive down a highway at rush hour, sitting there surrounded by car exhaust for hours and you're claiming airplane trails are what's killing us? And you believe that's what's causing the dust on your windows? And your freedoms are being removed by carbon credit systems. Which freedoms speech? religion? And then you close by reminding us of airplanes again. Tell me what you are so afraid of with airplane exhaust. I mean, it's not great, but of all things to get your socks in a bunch....airplane exhaust.

@@geraldyin5913 sure, not like there are already humans there in crisis, nevermind the wildlife- who needs them? Just cut down the jungle like S America is doing.....wait, what do trees do?

We've known this for 50+ years. We've only increase greenhouse gases.

@@MrWaterbugdesign That's because we can't accept the only true solution- a dramatic reduction in our standard of living. Every other organism not domesticated by man, creates no ecological footprint because they constitute ecology- the struggle over local resources which requires every organism to give and take appropriately. Innovation and technology will never reconcile us to nature because human production is not regenerative; it is completely one-sided, the Anthropocene. Out of convenience, we've extradited ourselves from our Mother. Laws of equilibrium and scarcity that hold life in check no longer constrain us. We all interact with and live in unhealthy, artificial environments, even if we don't drive carbon-emitting vehicles, consume non-organic foods, or indulge in frivolous shopping. Agricultural surplus, urban production and transportation create cities, where nature is kept at bay to provide a petri dish for humanity.

@@MG-ik3wy It's not our nature.

Private cleared land that is unused for one year reverts to the public commons and trees planted OR cleared raw land is taxed at double (for example) the rate of tree planted land. Just a couple thoughts.

@@Hippiekinkster yes, coming up with ideas to fix problems, is something I've always thought government was for. But obviously they answer to the money. So our job now is to vote them out and find people that will listen to the people.

the ozone hole, toxification of the ocean, the clearing of the rainforest,...what this means is that the human race has almost always behaved like garbage and that if anyone treated us the way we treat everything else we would go to war and kill it

@@straytarnish9443 Ozon hole was a lie as it gets smaller and bigger with temp, has nothing to do with temp. The rainforest you need to talk to the people there. Nothing wrong with the ocean, you one of the people that really think there is a plastic island?

All it took for the year without a summer (1817) to happen was one volcano in Indonesia to go off and produce massive amounts of gas. We have zero control over this planet. The planet’s just gonna do its thing. We just need to be prepared for whatever we can rather than trusting in tech & science gods or government gods. There’s only ONE God who can make this planet work the way He wants it to. We don’t get much a say in this.

@@rachelczumaya2806 god is a douche. Please stop wasting society's resources , don't go to society's hospitals , rely on your precious god

@@jimlincoln1283 no it was real and CFC r12 was banned because of it. yes the ocean is becomming more acidied due to global increases in co2 emissions. The last mass extinctions also were caused by co2 emissions and it acidifed the worlds oceans killing off most of the worlds vertibret.

If we don't want to do that then we need wide ranging reform like yesterday.

Nice comment!

They are monsters

Yep that barren wasteland is quickly aproaching.

@@aviciousbeast7757 YES IT IS , SPECIALLY IF WE DISRUPT THE THIN AND DELICATE BALANCE OF THE ATMOSPHERE BY BANNING CO2 , A GAS TREMENDOUSLY IMPORTANT TO THE WATER CICLE , THE LESS CO2 LESS RAIN AND LESS PLANTS ... STUPID PEOPLE . THE WORLD IS RULED BY BAD PEOPLE AND THIS IS A BAD STORY TO CONFUSE YOU BECAUSE YOU DON´T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT BUT YOU BELIEVE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE "EXPERTS" ... THINK FOR YOURSELF , STOP BEING LAZY , DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH .LEARN ABOUT THE SUN , ABOUT THE RAIN , THE CLIMATE , THE CICLE OF THE WATER , GET TO KNOW THE PLANTS AND WHAT THEY NEED TO THRIVE ...THIS IS POINTLESS , I´M WASTING MY TIME

Go spend some time in nature please .

They should shoot you into orbit

You exist BECAUSE of climate change..its THE driver of evolution on earth..in REAL science like paleontology and astronomy not junk science like predicting the future climates..chaos theory say you CANT..A warm life filled earth is FROM C02...be glad..ice ages arent good for life:)

WOW, someone almost gets it!

You're an Environmentalist, too? 💙 I'll be doing this "til the Love runs out". That last part are song lyrics.

Your 100% correct. But millionaires are made from this lie so it's ok.

Except we are totally destroying our oceans

@@rbene01 who is we? Not we, the controllers that use power against us.

@@shernshigity we are partially responsible. Ever wonder where what you flush down your toilet goes? What about all that trash you put in the bin outside. Out of sight, out of mind?

@@LynxStarAuto the impact of an individual person is not even 0.00000000001% of climate change. Your mindset is very damaging, it keeps big companies and rich polliters from taking responsibility. It's not a problem caused by everyone, it's a select few.

Yes

Roman strengthened concrete with volcanic lava

Maybe we need to figure a way to set off a few of the smaller volcanos that are close to eruption...the cool off might help but would the ashened air become more of a problem for evaporation and health of people ,plants ,and animals in general...just a thought from someone who knows little of science and volcanic activity.

@@blueforest2927 I was thinking the same thing. Maybe on some islands so the ocean bears the brunt of the shade.

Volcanism produces massive CO2.....we produce nothing in comparison.

​@@dthomas9230study Permian-Triassic Extinction

Light and or infrared heat reflecting materials on roofs would help.

How do you feel about 75 yrs of weather and climate modification ?

@@Meekseek For the entirety of my life, people having been calling it out, trying to warn everyone. Artists, scientists, writers, etc. Meanwhile, the people most able to make the needed changes have doubled down on destruction and actively blocked attempts to preserve and repair. Given that being my personal experience, given that I have watched the climate around me visibly and dramatically change because of deliberate neglect and abuse, I feel frustrated.

We're already painting roofs with aluminum colored tar.

@@spaghettigod43 mp L L L L L L L L

As with most junk science advocates...sounds great and even somewhat accurate. However, the reality is moe in favor of your mom and dads answer. If not for the fact that there is NEVER a static scenario where technology and our discovery allow us to become stagnant and unable to adapt accordingly. Always remember necessity is the mother of invention. Geological fuel sources have only been driving our economies for about 100+ years. Halfway into that timeframe we have discovered how to go to the moon and harness the atom for energy as well as battery powered tools. Point is, our technology will ALWAYS drive faster than the alarmists dooms day scenarios. Ask any one of them to implement all the science as well as the biologies to map out a solution and they become dead silent. We still know little about this planet and it's ability to do what it does with the resources it has much like a neurosurgeon has mor questions than answers about the human brain.

Adding, humans love to do what's expedient in the moment, ignoring future consequences. As a sad example that may end our lives with war, Nanci Pelosi as you know goes to Taiwan to support democracy over attocracy. WELL, WHAT THE HELL HAS THE U.S. BEEN DOING MASSIVELY IMPORTING GOODS FROM CHINA FOR NUMEROUS DECADES NOW, GIVING AUTOCRATIC, COMMUNIST CHINA MASSIVE MONEY TO GROW THEIR MILITARY. I mean how stupid and false is that, if we really believe in democracy over attocracy. AND, that doesn't account for the fact that any time you have a trade imbalance between 2 countries, the lessor-trader is mortgaging their future away, selling away their future; it's exactly like being addicted to a drug -- let me have a good feeling now, for huge pain later. And finally, that also does not include giving China tons of manufacturing secrets and technology over decades. ... just another example of how horridly short-and-dumb-sighted people are.

@@wjgoh653 I wish I had an iota of faith in your scientific advances trumps catastrophic consequences hypothesis. Or maybe not.

Ok hawkings

@@wjgoh653 Double check your sources. Fossil fuels have been used on a global scale for around 200 years, not 100.

@@joaocosta3374 yes an there's to many people on the planet

​@@KevMac582020 was bad for climate. Less emission meant more sun got into ocean Pick a lane want clean air or cold planet not getting both

Oh youre my age….so i guess then you also remember when we were kids we were told the problem destroying the planet was the holes in the ozone from the use of aerosol cans like aqua net? By those calculations the world should have ended already….but then it became “global warming” & the ice caps were gonna drown us all…except when they didnt & we were seeing unprecedented snowfall across America with the entire country under snow except florida back in 2010-2011, then we had a freakishly warm 2012 winter right back to crazy snow again in 2013 at which point it changed AGAIN to “climate change”….come 2016 we only had 12yrs to save the planet lol i thought we were starting to get uncomfortably close to the latest “end of the world” deadline when to my delight I stumbled upon this to find out it’s changed yet AGAIN, but we’re just back to “global warming” again & the great news is that we’ve got another THIRTY YEARS added on to “save the planet”….still no word on how that ozone layer is doing (i guess that was a problem that fixed itself w/flat hair trends lol) only bad news here is that to save the planet- we just need to bring our “c02 emissions” down to ZERO!! (Which means, you’re going to die to save a planet thats infinitely stronger than you since ZERO emissions = NO MORE BREATHING!!) if we’re gonna die regardless then why bother? Or better yet…,if a bunch of elitist billionaires who all openly admit to seeing us peons as an invasive pathogen on “THEIR” planet, who have kept fear mongering for the last 50yrs but changing their story to fit current weather patterns & who, since the vietnam war, have had technology capable of fcking with the weather- causing storms, moving storms etc that they could EASILY blame on you - perhaps coming to the realization that psychopaths are playing off the typical good nature of us little people & that THEYRE LYING TO US might be a better “solution” to this problem overall….the creator of the weather channel thought so, God bless him…

@@hurricanekitty6736 pumping CO2 into the atmosphere 10 times faster then the petm extinction event. What's the worst that could happen?

Most of us prefer it warmer so settle down cowboy. Why don't you just move to Alaska if you like cold so much.

They aren't shrinking they are growing. cO2 is life of living for living!

Now if only greedy polluters and decision makers will take action

Somehow I don't think what's in the best interest of the planet is the same for humans. All this effort is not about saving the planet, it's about using our technology to change the environment so humans can continue live on the planet...Its funny when you thinks that dinosaurs, a creature with a brain about 2.5 oz live on this planet over 165 million years...while the really smart humans have only been around for about 300,000 years...and there's a good chance this might be our last century....Two things got us in to this mess...and it's the same two things that will prevent us from implementing a solution...and those are capitalism and political will....finding and implement a solution is a joke when you realize that approximately 54 percent of Americans do not believe global warming/climate change/climate crisis will cause major problems within their lifetimes...So just sit back, grab a beer and watch another episode of American Ninja warrior... Well there ain't no time to wonder why...Whoopee! we're all gonna die.....Hope I didn't bum you out too much.

@@maddogwillie1019 thank you

Well I watch this for about maybe a minute or two then I heard one of these ratchet mouth contributors stating that humans must survive. Bulshit.

The story of Christ is an illustration of how one man's life is important. Collective theory is an abomination.

@@georgehoffman7846 It's all about saving the elite, not humanity or the planet.

You exist BECAUSE of climate change..its THE driver of evolution on earth..in REAL science like paleontology and astronomy not junk science like predicting the future climates..chaos theory say you CANT..

stephen................humanity all by itself has NO HOPE................THE ONLY HOPE THE WORLD HAS IS ''JESUS CHRIST'',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF EVERYBODY'S EYES AND THEY REFUSE TO SEE IT................

Live off the grid and hunt for your food. Lead by example

@@yardlimit8695 lol, The silverline of human demise, via climate change, will be no more fairy tales religions.

Humans overpopulation is the real problem

Most of us have families and kids? Speak for yourself! Some of us are adults that never had children. My priorities are different than yours.

Serious?

Climate always changes through time. When I was young, you could still debate these theories but now all of a sudden it has become fact.

@@NorthernGate777 bro shut up.

You exist BECAUSE of climate change..its THE driver of evolution on earth..in REAL science like paleontology and astronomy not junk science like predicting the future climates..chaos theory say you CANT..A warm life filled earth is FROM C02...be glad..ice ages arent good for life:)

The question is do you want to cool the planet! Cold will kill more people than warming.

A good watch? You mean like a Timex? Or a nice gold retirement gift? A good watch. HAHAHAHAHA!

WORLD POLLUTION FORMULATED MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX WILL CAPTURE THAT BLACK CARBON SPEWING FROM THE WORLDS INDUSTRIAL SMOKESTACKS The solution for capturing carbon was discovered in my lab and candle shop over 40 years ago. I knew back then that this was going to come to this day. I had to search for the answer and did. The heat loss from a smokestack can be forced or harnessed into a large tank containing hot liquid microcrystalline petroleum wax. The heat will keep the wax in a molten state which facilitate the carbon to be absorbed when combined with the wax. Carbon when mixed with wax reacts like a dye. The wax-carbon amalgamation will result in a black wax solution thereby making it impossible for the carbon to escape into the environment while in a liquid state. Other toxic particles are also captured in the wax settling at the bottom of the tank as a sludge. A sludge release valve is located at the bottom of the tank. After the sludge is removed more wax is replaced in the tank working something like a toilet. The sludge becomes a byproduct that can be used as an additive to asphalt for roads or used for cocooning nuclear waste materials for long-term safe burial. The entropy of the Earth has been increasing at a startling rate since the beginning of the industrial revolution caused mainly by the carbon that is released into the atmosphere. Government scientists have failed to stop and prevent carbon pollution from entering the environment. This problem can only worsen until a solution is found before this problem becomes irreversible. It has been discovered that formulated wax has been shown to be the only answer to this problem. PREVENTING SPREADING RADIATION: This formulated wax will also help prevent the spread of radiation such as preventing the escape of Plutonium dust particles from nuclear reactors or from structures or buildings housing radioactive materials. In 1994 This method was successfully demonstrated on the Sarcophagus of Chernobyl's blown-out reactor # 4 that was leaking Plutonium dust particles through open seems. In 1995 formulated wax tape was used to cocoon radioactive metal that had spat out of the reactor at the time of the explosion for safe long-term burial. In 1993 a wax membrane method was used in the yard of an abandoned house about five miles from Chernobyl to demonstrate how to reclaim radioactive contaminated territories for re-cultivation. I have been researching wax for solving mankind created environmental problems since 1969. As I aged, I discovered many other uses for wax such as making candles or replicas of people's hands. This led to coating the hand castings with latex rubber. After the latex had cured, I inserted latex rubber tubing a quarter of an inch tubing in the tips of each finger that was sealed with the latex. After the latex had cured, I was able to pull the end of the tubing that caused the fingers to contract. By pulling the ends of all five tubs the hand would close or grip and was able to pick up things such as a pencil or jelly beans just like a normal hand would do. The end result would act like a normal hand. I was able to color the hand to match the color tone of the hand that I replicated. The end result was a prosthesis hand. Through the years I have discovered many other uses of formulated wax for solving environmental problems: Here is a list of confirmed uses since 1969. OTHER USES FOR SOLVING POLLUTION PROBLEMS USING WAX: • Remove oil spills from dry or wet sand, soil, water, ice This method was demonstrated for the Canadian government in 1974 to remove oil from a beach on Passage Island. This method was demonstrated to the US Coast Guard on two occasions, one in Hawaii and the other in the state of Texas demonstrated to the Canadian Coast Guard on two occasions. Oil can be removed from beach sand as though it was a giant carpet More demos were shown to the Canadian press on three occasions. • Preventing radiation leaking from reactors, buildings, and storage facilities. This method was used to prevent Plutonium dust particles from escaping into the environment from open cracks and seams on the Sarcophagus of Chernobyl's blown out reactor # 4 in 1994 • Cocooning asbestos coated pipes wiring for safe removable This was demonstrated in the basement of an apt building that has 319 feet of loose asbestos • Cocooning radioactive waste for a long term safe burial. This method was demonstrated in Chernobyl by removing a 4” x 5 ‘ rusting metal tubing that was buried and coating half the tubing with a special microcrystalline wax and then re buried. • Removing radioactive contaminated hot spots from soil surfaces approx. 4 feet square in Chernobyl in 1995 • Preventing uranium mine tailing particles from becoming airborne in 1987 by laying a wax membrane on the mine tailing surface in Elliot Lake Ontario. • Preventing radon gas from entering into homes or buildings demonstrated on three homes having very high Radon levels where 95% of the Radon was blocked. • Preventing crushed coal dust particles from escaping moving open rail car trains was demonstrated in 1975 by spraying hot microcrystalline wax on the exposed coal surface to prevent the coal particles from becoming airborne while the train was in motion. • Preventing fly or bottom ash pile dust particles from becoming airborne Removing bunker oil, diesel fuel, gasoline transformer oil demonstrated for Ontario Hydro in Kinston Ontario in 1991 William Nelson, waxogen@gmail.com Please share, thx

This is PBS not fox

Why spend a fortune on a non-problem? Because this is what the WEF has planned for us plebs. It is good for their power and business.

No, they'll kill us all. It's all bullshit. Where are the model runs made in the 1980s? How accurate did they get 2022? Whether or not climate change is real, it also a racket. Each one of these shows tries to be MORE hyperbolic than the rest.

Not sure if the fossil fuel industry wants carbon capture either. If carbon capture tech becomes scalable then these companies might be required to pay for the installation of these technologies. But you are right that without expanding clean energy capture none of these technologies really do anything.

100% agree with you!

İt won't matter we are crossing peak oil , and absolute peak technological advancement , get ready for the worst side of humanity winner take all , earth stripping pointless race to the bottom world wars .......

I think this research is something the fossil fuel companies are funding, just to be at the forefront of energy production.

Agreed. Unfortunately when an outlet like PBS can be captured to sell this green trash there’s little hope to stopping carbon emissions.

When you look out on the world it's a sad sad show if you think of it as run by angels, however if you think of it as run by monkeys pretty amazing - Terence McKenna said someone said this

Trees actually do produce cooling. Both real cooling of the ambient air through evapotranspiration, as well as creating shade. That shade can be used to reduce the need of air conditioning which saves energy and thus carbon emissions.

@Omni0404 First of all, have you been to the Amazon? Deciduous trees only produce shade underneath them. And only when they have leaves. Conifers, on the other hand, don't provide shade. In an older forest that say has 3 story Lodge Pole Pines do produce shade however if you are in a conifer forest, you will notice that they trap heat and that stored heat can get warm enough that you can feel the heat radiating off of them. Go on a hot day 30 degrees Celsius in an area full of Conifers. It is hotter near the tree and cooler the farther away you are. If you lived in an alpine area predominantly made up of Conifers, you would know this. I am not going to explain why Conifers behave life this. You can do your own research on Conifers and alpine ecosystems. And how they are designed to trap and radiate heat. All ecosystems have their roll on a global scale, including tundra, deserts, sage grasslands, wet lands, glaciers areas, and heavily rocky areas that only support moss and lichen. Not to mention you can not grow trees on the oceans, seas and lakes either.....🤣

@Omni0404 regarding trees to cool your homes, this only works if you have enough trees, taller than your home , close enough to your home, surrounded your home. This isn't always as practical as it sounds, and there is a safe distance from how close to your home you can plant trees, and often how many trees you can have. Then, you need to account for your water usage bill and sewage that the city has to process, and disposal or composting is required. Disposal means it ends up in a landfill site. Composting produces CO2 emissions.

@@AmandaHugandKiss411 Thank you for admitting that trees do produce cooling and that all trees block the sun 😁. That was some intense face saving behavior from you. You missed out on a lot though. Why do you think a tree has to be taller than a house to provide cooling? Do you not know that the sun has to rise and set before it reaches its zenith? You would be amazed at how much heat is transfered being in direct sunlight. By lowering the amount of time your house is exposed to direct sunlight there is a significant drop in temperature.

I agree ...google "dr david suzuki" he is talking about the extinction of man kind thanks to a combination over over population plus our life style.

No, we too are doomed. You were right the first time.

We are doomed, the world is still burning fossil fuels at the highest level ever. India gets all their energy from coal fired plants. That's just one example. China is so bad you cant even see the sky. Although they are not admitting it we are already past the point of no return. The positive feedback loop has already started and we can't stop that. We are already seeing extreme weather events that are unprecidented. Those are facts and we still have the Republican party won't even talk about renewables. Which would create so many jobs the unemployment rate would be lower than it's ever been. We could recreate a green sustainable new industrial revolution and people in other countries could copy our models and follow suit. But the Big Oil lobby won't let that happen they've bought practically the whole government. It's sad because we have the solutions and we're not doing much at all.

@@svarog63 Well... I'm a senior citizen. So I won't see the worst of it. The best I can do is keep working on it in the hopes that my kids and grandkids have it "less worse" than otherwise.

Consuming less should be the most basic part. Unreal how this is missed by this documentary.

Data conflicts your claims.