Integral of e^x*ln(x) with special function and DI method (aka integration by parts) subscribe to @blackpenredpen for more fun calculus videos.
Пікірлер: 158
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia or WolframAlpha?
@ezraguerrero28795 жыл бұрын
Wolfram
@user-xq1sl7wy6p5 жыл бұрын
Wolfram
@veluvoluvenkat76355 жыл бұрын
Wikipedia
@thedoublehelix56615 жыл бұрын
Wolfram
@mathsvine60325 жыл бұрын
Wolfram
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Note. You can also use Ei(x) being the integral from -inf to x of e^t/t I am not really sure why Wikipedia and math world defined it that way. But I have another video on it coming soon
@plaustrarius5 жыл бұрын
Special functions series perhaps? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mathematical_functions
@ansansns18115 жыл бұрын
You can turn e^x to a series and then the solution will be very simple
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
Ans Ansns Well, no, since you cannot simplify the resulting series into a closed-form answer.
@ansansns18115 жыл бұрын
@@angelmendez-rivera351 You are right . The answer isn't a closed form answer but it still a simple solution . Anyone can understand it .
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
Ans Ansns You're the only person here who would call that a "simple" answer.
@davedonnie64255 жыл бұрын
Old macdonald had a farm Ei(Ei(o))
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Lolllll!!! Love it!!!
@jayapandey25415 жыл бұрын
BPRP *doesn't say to try it first* Me: OK. Another non - elementary integral.
@zavionw.80525 жыл бұрын
BPRP: *gives a 7-second dark theme to the integral for the intro* Me: Alright another non-elementary integral.
@dhruvshah83105 жыл бұрын
Wow !! I've been waiting for this integral for somewhere to be on KZfaq ! And here it is !! Thank you so much sir 🙏🙏😊
@6c15adamsconradwilliam35 жыл бұрын
I will never forget the +C
@Honest-King5 жыл бұрын
I didn't get that grade at any calclus subject but in diffrential I got a +B
@erikkonstas5 жыл бұрын
Legend has it that the missing ) was never found...
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Oh yea lol!
@Honest-King5 жыл бұрын
That's what I do when I am bored in math class lol
@tryphonunzouave83845 жыл бұрын
@@Honest-King What ? forgetting to close parenthesis ?
@Honest-King5 жыл бұрын
@@tryphonunzouave8384 Telling the instructer/teacher that he missed a parenthesis
@Extraordinary10s5 жыл бұрын
I literally spent 20 minutes trying to solve this integral, only to end up knowing that this has a non elementary solution. Is there a way to know whether an integral has an elementary solution or not?
@JSSTyger5 жыл бұрын
Yes. First write 5 pages of equations and then realize that it doesn't work. That's how you find out.
@General12th5 жыл бұрын
I do not believe there is any way to know in advance whether or not there exists an elementary antiderivative. You just have to look it up. *Proving* there is no elementary antiderivative is harder.
@mathssolverpoint60595 жыл бұрын
Use Laplace transformation
@Honest-King5 жыл бұрын
@@mathssolverpoint6059 Oh yeah laplace ... I forgot everything eventhough I took it at January - May
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
Actually, there is a way. There are algorithms that allow you to test a function for non-elementary antiderivatives. An example is the Risch algorithm, although this one in particular only works for a special class of functions.
@yaleng45975 жыл бұрын
"Don't forget the +C" But you forgot to close the bracket.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha yea....
@VibingMath5 жыл бұрын
Wow learn something new! Can't wait for your next video on Ei(x)!😍
@jayapandey25415 жыл бұрын
Factorial of the Exponential integral. Great idea.
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
@@jayapandey2541 Hmmmm, that will be a challenge!
@plaustrarius5 жыл бұрын
Did u-substitution until I got the integral of 1/(lnx) which cannot be integrated using elementary functions. So my answer turned out to be ln(x)*e^x - Li(e^x) where Li is the logarithmic integral. Fun!
@mehmeteminconkar259010 ай бұрын
Me 2
@ezraguerrero28795 жыл бұрын
15th view and 10th like. Love being early to watch your content! Always enjoy what you do! I Had barely seen these special integral defined functions; very interesting...
@PokeballmasterInc5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for answering my question bprp! Glad to finally know the answer now :)
@chankk45605 жыл бұрын
is it possible to expand e^x into series form, and make e^x/x into 1/x+SUMMATION(x^(k-1)/k!) from 1 to inf, then we integrate it as power of x?
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
Chan KK You can, you simply cannot simplify the answer beyond summation.
@dexter23925 жыл бұрын
Yeah, you can integrate it termwise and it turns out to be very pretty (because each term's power will get reduced by 1 because of the /x.) But the thing is, you cannot put it into elementary function form from there. It is still a summation.
@kamilziemian9955 жыл бұрын
@@dexter2392 Which theorem guarantees that we can integrate this term by term?
@dexter23925 жыл бұрын
@@kamilziemian995 well, Taylor's theorem, because polynomials can be differentiated infinitely many times and always give other polynomials, this also means that they can be integrated infinitely many times :)
@kamilziemian9955 жыл бұрын
@@dexter2392 I remember that doing things "term by term" infinity many times is tricky. Even in "obvious" situation. So, I'm not so sure that this is enough. For example. If I want to compute integral in some limits ("area under curve"), I must guarantying that series converge in appropriate sens, like Lebesgue'a dominate theorem or uniformly convergence. And because there exists functions that have all derivatives, but are not analytical, Taylor's theorem is clearly not enough here. Naive argument would suggest to me, that this is always possible due to Taylor's theorem. Of course I can just don't understand which version of Taylor's theorem you have in mind.
@jirehchoo21515 жыл бұрын
Great, I can revise my integration by parts. Thanks! My exam in 2 days time
@anordinarysoul81975 жыл бұрын
Learned something new. Cool!
@jjeherrera4 жыл бұрын
Thinking as a physicist I would just make a Taylor expansion of e^x. Whether the series converges depends on the integration limits.
@wilsonporteus59434 жыл бұрын
I don't remember asking for this but I am very grateful
@electrovector72125 жыл бұрын
Bprp please show olympiad question solutions. I think it will be very useful. Because calculus is in university or in a little part of high school. But olympiad is based on much simpler maths and it will show everyone to think in other ways. If you notice this I will be very happy. Support please so bprp can see this. Thanks from Turkey
@mustafakemalturak17744 жыл бұрын
I enjoying while watching your videos
@frozenmoon9985 жыл бұрын
Interesting integral!
@MrDerpinati3 жыл бұрын
i got bored in class and so i challenged myself to this question... i somehow got e^2 ( ln(x) - sum from n to infinity ( (n-1)! / x^n) + C, since i still dont know much about the Ei() function i doubt youll see this since im over a year late but i basically got it from nonstop using the DI method and finding a pattern that could be collapsed into an infinate summation
@dipteshgupta809223 күн бұрын
can we solve the integral of e^x/x further by writing the taylor expansion of e^x ??
@yassine3213 жыл бұрын
The legend say when the exponential enter the integral the integral fall in love with exponential for ever
@mathsvine60325 жыл бұрын
Good approach 👍👍
@lythd5 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@sadigov Жыл бұрын
Very niiiice! I liiiike! - Borat Sagdiyev
@przemysawkwiatkowski26745 жыл бұрын
3:40 Why can we use fundamental theorem of calculus? This integral goes from +oo to x... Is +oo allowed here? Why?
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
We can be more technical as follows, Break the integral into two piece. One goes from -x to a then the other goes from a to inf.
@mm-ny3nj5 жыл бұрын
1:13 why dont you use the series definition of thr exponentail function and u will get ∫Σ(x^(n-1)/n!)dx Which evaulates, with interchanging the order of the integral and the summations sign, to: Σ(x^n/(n!*n))+c
@limitXbreaker5 жыл бұрын
It too me to few months to realise that the channel's name is *Black Pen Red Pen*. I always thought its something blackrependen 😂
@adityasingh41232 жыл бұрын
Sir plz concept of exponential intergal fuction pe ekk video bna do i am not clear concept of E(x) I love mathematics plz sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@ang_gml5 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@IdreesIMala5 жыл бұрын
Vare good
@deymos_arts6213 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!!❤
@markgh24915 жыл бұрын
Day three of asking BPRP to help me solve (3x^3 - x^2 + 2x - 4)/sqrt(x^2 - 3x + 2) dx from 0 to 1. Thank you and keep up the great videos!
@Anistuffs5 жыл бұрын
I googled that and found this www.quora.com/How-do-I-integrate-dfrac-3x-3-x-2-2x-4-sqrt-x-2-3x-2-dx Hope it helps.
@inkaandinii3 жыл бұрын
What about if e^x2?
@gabirelsanchezferra3365 жыл бұрын
=1/x e^x que al integrar = ln|x| e^x +c
@khalafibrahem39285 жыл бұрын
please What is the integral of tan (lnx) I need it
@saradehimi47915 жыл бұрын
I think I'm not sure : =xtan(Lnx) -2argth(tan(Lnx/2)) +Ln|1-tan(Lnx/2)| + Ln|1+tan(Lnx/2)| + c
@khalafibrahem39285 жыл бұрын
@@saradehimi4791 Thank you so much but how you solve that
@saradehimi47915 жыл бұрын
Firstly I used integration by parts then I used y=tan(lnx/2) and cos(lnx) =1-y²/1+y² dx=2y/1+y² But as I said I'm not sure brother
@khalafibrahem39285 жыл бұрын
Yes that is nice I will try your ways
@ThePharphis4 жыл бұрын
Great shirt
@rahulchowdhury76355 жыл бұрын
u r great
@mdajiruddin84905 жыл бұрын
Good
@Culmen2225 жыл бұрын
Dr. Peyam knows that Ei is german for egg.
@rahulchowdhury76355 жыл бұрын
thnx sir
@mathssolverpoint60595 жыл бұрын
Use Laplace
@mehmeteminconkar259010 ай бұрын
I found a way to write ei(x) as a taylor series expansion
@Honest-King5 жыл бұрын
I lost my foucs at Ei(X) I don't get it what is " Ei " ? And what does it do ?
@user-sy2vd3kn2x5 жыл бұрын
Use integration by parts and you wind up with e^xlnx - int(e^x/x). We consider the unsolvable integral of e^x/x as a ei(x). (i think so might be wrong)
@angelmendez-rivera3515 жыл бұрын
He literally explain it in the video. I still don't understand why people bother to comment on videos without finishing them. It's dumb.
@justabunga15 жыл бұрын
Ei(x) stands for exponential integral, which is a non-elementary function.
@chirayu_jain5 жыл бұрын
Next integral of sin(x)*arcsin(x)
@saradehimi47915 жыл бұрын
I think it's : =-arcsinx*cosx +(sinx/√1-x²) -2Ln|tan(x/2)| +Ln|tan²(x/2)| + c
@chirayu_jain5 жыл бұрын
Saya Sayya but how?
@56shauryasingh335 жыл бұрын
@@chirayu_jain its basic product rule of integration
@chirayu_jain5 жыл бұрын
JustArduinoThings Ok 👍🏻 understood
@56shauryasingh334 жыл бұрын
@@aneeshsrinivas9366 where did you study maths?
@future625 жыл бұрын
Deus Ei(x) Machina....
@aleksandervadla48405 жыл бұрын
Do you have any tips to Get better in meth?
@sadigov Жыл бұрын
Don’t do meth!
@sriramshenoy34545 жыл бұрын
Can you integrate lnx/(1+lnx)^2? Thank you
@blackpenredpen5 жыл бұрын
Sriram Shenoy Where did you get that problem?
@sriramshenoy34545 жыл бұрын
@@blackpenredpen My teacher gave it to me
@justabunga15 жыл бұрын
The answer is x/(1+ln(x))+C.
@mhersaribekyan14875 жыл бұрын
What if it is -C and not +C ? r/hmmm
@user-zy6gn8vz2x5 жыл бұрын
C might be negative as well as positive as well as zero. We'll never know 'cause of the undetermined form of the integral
@justabunga15 жыл бұрын
The C stands for the constant of integration. Even if you put in negative numbers or 0, it would count as +C.
@mhersaribekyan14875 жыл бұрын
@@justabunga1 Thanks for explanation, but it was just a joke!
@titanwilkins40445 жыл бұрын
MATH YES
@nuklearboysymbiote5 жыл бұрын
What is the meaning of math?
@breadsneakypeaky11045 жыл бұрын
To be able to get a gf
@artey66715 жыл бұрын
Having fun and being the cool kid in class.
@erikkonstas5 жыл бұрын
To flunk hilariously.
@paramgupta78355 жыл бұрын
42....+1
@okhtayghorbani63615 жыл бұрын
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🏻
@bikrammarasini20215 жыл бұрын
Please integrate xtanx
@justabunga15 жыл бұрын
The integral is non-elementary. It would come out to be -xln(abs(cos(x)))+integral of ln(abs(cos(x))dx+C
@JivrajSandhu4 жыл бұрын
I'd like to report a blue pen also sneaked into your video
@user-rz3id7nm6s5 жыл бұрын
Don't forget +c 😂😅😅😂😃
@acertainbastard55795 жыл бұрын
Or is it -C?
@user-rz3id7nm6s5 жыл бұрын
@@acertainbastard5579 The same thing
@acertainbastard55795 жыл бұрын
@@user-rz3id7nm6s that's like saying C++ is the same as C
@user-rz3id7nm6s5 жыл бұрын
@@acertainbastard5579 My friend . I meant +c it's just like -c
@acertainbastard55795 жыл бұрын
@@user-rz3id7nm6s and I'm saying C++=/=C Both are separate languages