Can You Capture a Light Wave? Mind-Blowing Wave-Particle Duality Experiment!

  Рет қаралды 1,153,323

The Action Lab

The Action Lab

6 жыл бұрын

In this video I show you an easy way to show that light is neither a wave nor a particle (or it is both?) by doing the double slit experiment followed by an analog of the photoelectric effect. This is a crazy experiment that shows how weird quantum mechanics really is. And an added bonus is that you can do these experiments at home! Finally I even show you what an electron orbital really means.
WARNING:
This video is for entertainment purposes only. If you use the information from this video for your own projects then you assume complete responsibility for the results.
My Other Channel:
/ @actionlabshorts
My Facebook Page:
goo.gl/dSXx8u
For more awesome videos checkout:
Stacking Pringles in a Complete Circle-The Amazing Physics of Stacking
• Stacking Pringles in a...
Mixing the World's Blackest Paint With the World's Brightest Paint (Black 2.0 vs LIT)
• Mixing the World's Bla...
Is it Possible to Unboil an Egg? The Amazing Uncooking Experiment!
• Is it Possible to Unbo...
What if You Try To Lift a Negative Mass? Mind-Blowing Physical Impossibility!
• What if You Try To Lif...
What Does a Giant Monster Neodymium Magnet do to a Mouse?
• What Does a Giant Mons...
The Worlds Blackest Black vs The Worlds Brightest Flashlight (32,000 lumen)-Which Will Win?
• The Worlds Blackest Bl...
How Much Weight Can a Fly Actually Lift? Experiment-I Lassoed a Fly!
• How Much Weight Can a ...
If You Fly a Drone in a Car, Does it Move With It? (Dangerous In-Car Flight Challenge)
• If You Fly a Drone in ...
Can Flies Actually Fly in a Vacuum Chamber?
• Can Flies Actually Fly...
I Let a Venus Flytrap Digest My Finger For a Day-Little Shop of Horrors Challenge!
• I Let a Venus Flytrap ...
Drawing On Water-It is So Surreal!
• Drawing On Water-It is...
Can Magic Sand Get Wet in a Vacuum Chamber? So Satisfying!
• Can Magic Sand Get Wet...
Stretch Armstrong Crushed In A Hydraulic Press
• Stretch Armstrong Crus...

Пікірлер: 2 900
@JamesSamples
@JamesSamples 3 жыл бұрын
I never realized that the split could be done on a low budget. That's cool!
@johnbuck5181
@johnbuck5181 2 жыл бұрын
This whole channel is the most info for the lowest cost to make. Not an insult at all. It even featured “Da Vacuum Box”..as a table.
@gyro5d
@gyro5d 2 жыл бұрын
Use a laser and a straight pin.
@Nosezeichen
@Nosezeichen 2 жыл бұрын
Actually it isn't the real double slit experiment, but the results are still the same. The original experiment shoots one particle at a time, which splits at the double slit and afterwards interacts with it self and is measerued at the backplate. If we repeat this for a while we see the interferance pattern, whose amplitude corresponds to the probabilty of the particle beeing measured at this point. Only by shooting one particle at a time but still getting the interference pattern, you can proof that light is both a particle and a wave. If it wasn't a wave we would have no interference and would end up with two slits at the backplate (when repeating the experiment). Also the interference pattern does not exist when we measure through which slit the particle went. Simplified, measuring means physically poking the wave which collapses it to a particle again, so no interference and we end up with the two slit pattern again.
@pavel9652
@pavel9652 2 жыл бұрын
I think it can be done with the sunlight as well. This is how it was done in the first place, as they had no lasers back then ;) Veritasium has a video with a large cardboard box. The sunlight, however, produces the pattern in multiple colours.
@jonathan1613
@jonathan1613 2 жыл бұрын
Back in 2005 I successfully replicated the double slit experiment using a laser as well and found out for myself how cool physics and reality really are...
@Raxilla
@Raxilla 6 жыл бұрын
I love this channel. It's so underrated. No fancy graphics or animations. You cut through all the gunk with simple and clear explanations.
@jsmunroe
@jsmunroe 6 жыл бұрын
I think you mean understated, lol. He's got 809,000 subs.
@Raxilla
@Raxilla 6 жыл бұрын
Jordan Munroe He should have more.
@Slepepe
@Slepepe 6 жыл бұрын
not underrated anymore.
@legonut78
@legonut78 2 жыл бұрын
And not choked full of commercials and advertising.
@realvoidbla4881
@realvoidbla4881 2 жыл бұрын
@@jsmunroe 3.8M*
@suga4all
@suga4all 2 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. Love your videos. But here, a little mistake slipped in at 1:20: In order for the double slit experiment to work, you don't need plane waves. It also works with curved waves in the same way. The reason why it doesn't work with a light bulb is the low spatial coherence of the light in this case (which is an entirely different beast than curvature). It basically means, that because the light bulb is an extended light source, the light waves incident on the slit are coming from many directions at the same time. So they create many of these interference patterns which are mutually shifted and therefore wash each other out. Fun fact: If you place the light bulb very far away from the slit, it would in fact give you an interference pattern also in this case (with very low intensity though).
@swayammm__
@swayammm__ 2 жыл бұрын
I feel like you are getting ignored
@bojan82
@bojan82 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the clarification.
@mggt4684
@mggt4684 2 жыл бұрын
I think its obvious once you understeand the concept which I think he explained perfectly.
@realvoidbla4881
@realvoidbla4881 2 жыл бұрын
The Action Fail
@lazysingledaisybronwyn8105
@lazysingledaisybronwyn8105 Жыл бұрын
Suga4all, good to know. Did you notice the red light created a bulb-dimensional affect? And the blue light made a strict wall with ability to make a shadow immediately in front. Meaning, red moved away and caused a round bulge going away from us and blue caused a coming towards us with a flat wall shadow. The Red light was a real good for NOTHING liar. The blue was honest and real. So, red light makes for time and distance, a lie. Blue makes for what "is", truly. This is why the farthest thing we perceive in distance away from us is actually what is closest to us.
@tylertalsma7794
@tylertalsma7794 2 жыл бұрын
You basically explained quantum mechanics in a simple way it's amazing.
@Zimrack
@Zimrack Жыл бұрын
Why does quantum mechanics feel like intuition.
@noahway13
@noahway13 Жыл бұрын
@@Zimrack What do you mean by Intuition?
@ZERO3690
@ZERO3690 5 жыл бұрын
People are particles, but when you put them together, they act like waves
@LeemaxxLyrics
@LeemaxxLyrics 3 жыл бұрын
that's a cool way of thinking about it
@94Newbie
@94Newbie 2 жыл бұрын
that alone isnt actually correct. even in experiments with individual photons they act like waves, interferring with themselves. same is true for other particles. its the propability that takes the waveform regardless of the number of particles.
@christianlabanca5377
@christianlabanca5377 2 жыл бұрын
@@94Newbie true. But he was talking about people, and if you think about it, he's right haha. But yeah you're correct
@linkin543210
@linkin543210 2 жыл бұрын
Only Mexicans
@dattatrayakulkarni4873
@dattatrayakulkarni4873 2 жыл бұрын
Good example.
@spicymemeboi2646
@spicymemeboi2646 6 жыл бұрын
light is actually made of lasagna
@itme5657
@itme5657 6 жыл бұрын
Spicy Meme Boi stop being such a troll, that's so stupid, lasagna is made from light not vice versa. Duh
@overweightowl2295
@overweightowl2295 6 жыл бұрын
Emit lasaga
@thatguy-zester3500
@thatguy-zester3500 5 жыл бұрын
The action lab is a lasagna
@xMOSEScb
@xMOSEScb 5 жыл бұрын
Light is actually a bitch lasagna. Weird flex but whatever.
@Kris.G
@Kris.G 5 жыл бұрын
Bitch lasagna!
3 жыл бұрын
This guy just made my Physics class so much more interesting
@sahityamhalder7098
@sahityamhalder7098 2 жыл бұрын
It is interesting already 😋
@micro-playsquitted4132
@micro-playsquitted4132 2 жыл бұрын
Nope physics is not interesting without this video bro
@georgeplaxton3067
@georgeplaxton3067 3 жыл бұрын
When studying precious stones (opal), we were under the impression that different colours expressed was the micro beads in the silicate were of different sizes and behaved like prisms, re-enforcing individual colours (red, green and blue).
@micro-playsquitted4132
@micro-playsquitted4132 2 жыл бұрын
"micro beads in the silicate" My name is Micro
@Johnny-tw5pr
@Johnny-tw5pr 5 жыл бұрын
You should do the last experiment with blue light.
@faridpramudya7896
@faridpramudya7896 4 жыл бұрын
yuupzee
@MadhawaSadil
@MadhawaSadil 4 жыл бұрын
Johnny.50 yeah
@tenrabbits3069
@tenrabbits3069 4 жыл бұрын
QWERTY
@Nesrr18
@Nesrr18 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, i just wanted to write the same thing 😁
@thedarthknight7960
@thedarthknight7960 4 жыл бұрын
Ummm why is that?
@anujsinghchauhan24
@anujsinghchauhan24 6 жыл бұрын
This video really made my whole day. :) The best part is explaining such topics with simple, easy and fun experiments. You are doing a great job. A video on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is requested. Thanks. (Love from India.)
@AnilSharma-js7fi
@AnilSharma-js7fi 3 жыл бұрын
L
@vertigoz
@vertigoz 2 жыл бұрын
If only the double slit was to be made with blue light, perhaps we would see it painting it wide spread
@PhilTibble
@PhilTibble 3 жыл бұрын
So approachable and down to earth yet passes on so much knowledge. I love the genuine excitement. give this guy a laser pointer and a sharpie and some space in his garage and he makes me feel like I am learning more than I did in uni! yo PBS or TVO or BBC or someone get this guy a show!
@TimothyMichaels
@TimothyMichaels 6 жыл бұрын
Double slit glow in the dark project was lit.
@sukin2727
@sukin2727 6 жыл бұрын
Tim Michaels is that a pun
@TimothyMichaels
@TimothyMichaels 6 жыл бұрын
Game IT Out 272 Yes
@therorozizzle
@therorozizzle 6 жыл бұрын
Yea. LITerally.
@yoppindia
@yoppindia 5 жыл бұрын
Light can interfere with experiment, it should be dark.
@orobinson7429
@orobinson7429 6 жыл бұрын
I wish there were a better(easier)way to explain the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Great job on this video!! Keep it up!
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
My favorite experiment:)
@orobinson7429
@orobinson7429 6 жыл бұрын
kelan andersson so it is as confusing as I originally thought!! Thanks for the link, I liked it.
@sawwil936
@sawwil936 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab, wanna see the wave function?? I have a bunch of experiments showing it. Also got the electrons probability cloud nailed down.
@cjheaford
@cjheaford 2 жыл бұрын
Why didn’t you: Use the BLUE light with the make-shift double slit on the glow paint? Would we have seen an interference pattern? Particle like result? Both? We will never know.
@l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l
@l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l 2 жыл бұрын
it would be like the lightbulb
@birbdad1842
@birbdad1842 2 жыл бұрын
@@l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l-l Like the blue flashlight. Not the red bulb.
@sealofapoorval7437
@sealofapoorval7437 2 жыл бұрын
He did
@cjheaford
@cjheaford 2 жыл бұрын
@@sealofapoorval7437 Not through the double slit
@kimunpark2192
@kimunpark2192 2 жыл бұрын
Making interference pattern with the blue light is not easy because its wavelength is short. I guess he failed to make it at home. And it would lit the glow paint in the shape of the interference pattern.
@gamestuff5944
@gamestuff5944 4 жыл бұрын
No one: Not a single soul: This dude:just has potato chips taped to his desk
@ARISTO_Music
@ARISTO_Music 3 жыл бұрын
its not taped , its the glass side that holds the cardboard you can see it on the other side too , theres just a random potato chips bag on his desk
@helloguyswelcomeback7227
@helloguyswelcomeback7227 2 жыл бұрын
wow ur so cringe bro, stop and delete what you typed please.
@ssonia
@ssonia 2 жыл бұрын
@@ARISTO_Music true. 9:47
@gabrieldelatortilla1
@gabrieldelatortilla1 2 жыл бұрын
@@helloguyswelcomeback7227 ruining jokes is a lot more cringe fr
@Aric-ls7bf
@Aric-ls7bf 2 жыл бұрын
@@gabrieldelatortilla1 nobody: absolutely nobody: aliens in space: nobody at all: Am I funny yet ahhahhahhahahahahhah😃😃😃😃😃😃😃nobody: hahhahahhhahahaha funny so funny absolutely no one: 🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣😄🤣😄🤣🤣🤣🤣😄🤣 the more nobodies you add the funnier the joke gets!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😄😁😄🥲🤣🤣🤣😂😂😅😂😂😂😂🤣
@FriedChairs
@FriedChairs 6 жыл бұрын
Someone here said your channel is underrated and I think that's probably true. You are doing a really great job explaining complicated science topics in an interesting way. My 8 year old son and I have been watching them during dinner for the last few days and we are both really enjoying them. My son usually only gets excited about basketball games or dude perfect but I can see him getting excited about what you are doing.
@goddammitalana
@goddammitalana 6 жыл бұрын
Chris Bell stop giving your kid youtube instead of actually parenting. you shouldnt be watching youtube videos during dinner you should be talking with your son. jesus christ people like you is the reason kids arent developing social skills
@FriedChairs
@FriedChairs 5 жыл бұрын
@@goddammitalana Just a small update. My son just got into the AP math program. Scored 99 percentile on CogAT.
@abhinavprajapati5962
@abhinavprajapati5962 5 жыл бұрын
That someone below is actually someone above now
@robinjahn1294
@robinjahn1294 6 жыл бұрын
wow, that just explained to me how the electron orbitals work better than my chemistry teacher could in a decade xD (seriously, i`ve never really understood how orbitals work but now i do). Thanks for all of that science input, you can explain it like nobody else could
@blusky3591
@blusky3591 6 жыл бұрын
rubi_style Well i was astonished too! I used to think electrons follow just a single path orbiting the nucleus.
@hihtitmamnan
@hihtitmamnan 6 жыл бұрын
wtf? looking into wikipedia would fix ur problem in 1 minute...
@Viki-zo1bc
@Viki-zo1bc 3 жыл бұрын
I wish I were born in a simpler universe where light would be either particle or wave.
@roberthelms1737
@roberthelms1737 3 жыл бұрын
It is a coaxial circuit
@aakashmishraa
@aakashmishraa 3 жыл бұрын
ok than u should head to hell.. otherwise rest of the universe is more complex as we know till now about it ...
@satya9828
@satya9828 3 жыл бұрын
@@aakashmishraa How?
@roberthelms1737
@roberthelms1737 3 жыл бұрын
You are in a universe where light is neither a particle nor a wave. Light is a coaxial circuit made up of rarefactions and compressions of longitudinal dielectric pulses and necessitated electromagnetic divergent fronts from the compressions and rarefactions. Do not be sucked into the idiotic belief taught to us of the dual nature of light.
@Roosterwbass
@Roosterwbass 3 жыл бұрын
@@roberthelms1737 Heretic!
@LaylaVaughan
@LaylaVaughan 2 жыл бұрын
@The Action Lab, the experiment you do around 7 minutes in, isn't the fact that you used a *red* laser but an LED flashlight (which emits blue light, especially since that appears to be one with a higher color temperature) a big confound? You had already established the red light won't charge the glow in the dark surface, and that blue light will, so it seems hard to draw any conclusions about the quantized vs wavelike properties of light from that demonstration alone.
@rohannashikkar810
@rohannashikkar810 2 жыл бұрын
brandon i lietrally came to same conclusion... a blue laser would have resolved the issue much more clearly
@jthawken123
@jthawken123 2 жыл бұрын
Came to the comments to say this!
@dominickscott4454
@dominickscott4454 5 жыл бұрын
“Then after you’re thoroughly confused, I’ll explain what light really is.” I’ve never related more to anything in my life
@chrislayne9440
@chrislayne9440 6 жыл бұрын
So basically: Schroedinger's light.
@sbravoo
@sbravoo 4 жыл бұрын
this is the experiment that started the quamtum physics
@curiouschildalways8991
@curiouschildalways8991 3 жыл бұрын
Does that mean red light wont charge a glow in dark area
@Palladiumavoid
@Palladiumavoid 3 жыл бұрын
@@sbravoo that was the move that made scientists cry
@sbravoo
@sbravoo 3 жыл бұрын
@@Palladiumavoid yeah lol
@longleaf1217
@longleaf1217 3 жыл бұрын
well... I mean yeah, kinda, not really though. the cat thought experiment Schrödinger proposed was meant as a way to explain just how weird quantum phenomena is. he was trying to get across the idea to the general populace how it makes no sense that light (and indeed any particle) should behave both as a wave and a particle simultaneously. normally waves are nothing but the transmission of energy through a media (such as the ocean), the particles themselves shouldn't travel as waves yet thats what we see from these experiments. it is a problem that perplexes physicists to this day. The Schrödinger's cat thought experiment was explaining this very idea so it makes it a bit weird to take it and rebrand it as "Schrödinger's light".
@robertohvargas
@robertohvargas 3 жыл бұрын
Chingon el canal.! Dice un dicho: "Solo puedes decir que entiendes algo, si puedes explicarselo a tu abuela y hacer que ella entienda". La encarnacion misma de esta frase es este canal. Sigue con el buen trabajo. Saludos desde Mexico!!
@fagica
@fagica 2 жыл бұрын
The best explanation of the particle-wave duality I have seen on youtube. Bravo.
@gbye007
@gbye007 6 жыл бұрын
Light has the properties of a quantized wave: neither wave nor particle, neither fish nor fowl. The particle characterization of EMR has been superseded by quantum field theory. You don't need to invoke particles with momentum to explain a transfer of energy from photons to electrons. None the less, your double slit setup with the laser pointer is fun to see.
@petesclark
@petesclark 6 жыл бұрын
At 7:00 you are using a red laser for the double slit. Try it with the blue laser.
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
But the point was to show that an extremely high amplitude light still cannot charge it. Which means that light cannot be purely classical waves. Blue light still would have charged it so it wouldn’t have displayed that effect.
@mahmoudhamdi5411
@mahmoudhamdi5411 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab But red laser doesn't have a small amplitude so it won't make a difference if went through a double slit
@mumak1232
@mumak1232 6 жыл бұрын
RED light has wavelength around 700 nm and BLUE light around 400nm. (Momentum) P is inversely proportional to λ (wavelength). P = h/λ. Amplitude does not affect the momentum or the energy of a light wave. so it proves just that blue has higher energy than red. I looked up some specs for fluorescent materials, idk if its true fore every material but at least gives an idea. you can find more here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum www.celestialescapes.com/how-to-charge-your-glow-in-the-dark-gift.html
@rilkatop4830
@rilkatop4830 6 жыл бұрын
HEY did you study Einstein theory on Photoelectric Effect..... it depends on FREQUENCY not AMPLITUDE.... don't teach something wrong to guys here~~
@simran76
@simran76 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab Great video. And it'd be great to see the lit charged with a blue laser (and a blue laser with interference)...just for completeness.
@247dman
@247dman 4 жыл бұрын
Something I've been thinking about for a few days is what would happen if you shoot the interference pattern through a prism. Be it a pyramid or cube, I was wondering if that would give a view of the "wave like" property through "space" of the beam as opposed to just having it hit an opaque surface. (Basically like ballistic gelatin for light)
@philjamieson5572
@philjamieson5572 2 жыл бұрын
What an excellent presentation. Thanks for putting this on here. It's so cleverly explained.
@nerys71
@nerys71 6 жыл бұрын
I hope this endeavor works out for you. I have yet to watch a single boring video from you. You are one of the few that gets a guaranteed slot in my limited "watch stuff" time :-)
@Haze510
@Haze510 6 жыл бұрын
Nerys yea I never got bored of his vids 👌👌
@shreyassingh8316
@shreyassingh8316 6 жыл бұрын
first you confuse us by telling us something that we never almost talked about and then clear everything out you are great
@NadaaTaiyab
@NadaaTaiyab 2 жыл бұрын
This was a great video! Understood this concept better with this video than any other explanation in the past. Wonder if you could try the wave particle experiment with the blue light too next time.
@Hyxtryx
@Hyxtryx Жыл бұрын
Yes, that was a big missed opportunity.
@markrigoglioso
@markrigoglioso 2 жыл бұрын
Hey Action Lab, you always have interesting experiments, usually in some area I am investigating! Thanks. I have studied the light 'wave-particle' duality for a long time and I have concluded light is a wave with some particle-like properties. Specifically, light is the vibration of the ether which is most likely the neutrinos that pervade the entire universe. This is the 'quantum fabric' that makes up space and is the stuff that vibrates to make light. Light acts like a particle when a wave of the quantum fabric finds a particle that can absorb it and that wave collapses instantly into a localized energy transfer. The instantaneous behavior of light is confirmed in the fact that light has no inertia - it moves at its top speed instantly (from zero to 300,000 in 0 sec.) and it stops just as quickly. This instantaneous behavior is also confirmed by experiments showing quantum entanglement. Light is also confirmed as a wave because the energy of light is determined by its frequency, not its mass or velocity. The failure of modern physics to admit an ether makes the universe appear irrational. I have heard that the Michelson-Morley experiment has been overturned, and a drag component has been detected in light when the experiment is done with more precise instruments. The quantum fabric is also the stuff that rotates to make a magnetic field and is the source of fields in general, with attractive and repulsive properties, depending on the particle and / or direction of rotation while interacting with the field. These fields include the electric field, the magnetic field, the weak nuclear force and the strong nuclear force fields. Each field is determined by a frequency interacting with a particle and each one drops off by a particular inverse exponential - 2, 3, 4 or 5, respectively.
@brianbidiuk3125
@brianbidiuk3125 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that great explanation Mark! Saves me a lot of pondering. Lol!
@TT-hi7lp
@TT-hi7lp 6 жыл бұрын
Simply light and other particles are in superposition so it isn't a wave or particle but its still both before you messure it
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
Correct:)
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
Now tell me how to define a measurement:)
@snehasissahoo2485
@snehasissahoo2485 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab hey is saying that as the light particles r micro particle so we cannot track it or see it under even electron microscope... It moves before we see it
@bronske5919
@bronske5919 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab hey could you cover how our reality maybe a simulation in some kind of computer plz. This may explain why the quantum world behaves the way it does
@nuggetboi301
@nuggetboi301 6 жыл бұрын
Torille?
@MammaOVlogs
@MammaOVlogs 6 жыл бұрын
Way to go on your 8 hundred thousand subscribers! This is way over my head by way interesting! l loved it!
@simonfield9818
@simonfield9818 6 жыл бұрын
L
@awesomewolf3013
@awesomewolf3013 6 жыл бұрын
Momma O heas on 1000000 subscribers so yea
@al1383
@al1383 6 жыл бұрын
Momma O , dang! Now at 1M. Nice channel!
@hiitsamrit
@hiitsamrit 5 жыл бұрын
double than that now!
@f1shmail
@f1shmail 5 жыл бұрын
*cough* 2mil *cough cough*
@KiyakChannel
@KiyakChannel 5 ай бұрын
You are great; thank you for showing the experiments and the theory behind them separately.
@brianbidiuk3125
@brianbidiuk3125 2 жыл бұрын
I'm wondering if the color of the wave is pertinent? The laser you used was red, try a blue one. Also, how about shining both types of light, white incandescent and white colored laser through prism onto that sheet to see if what colors are absorbed. Might be pretty interesting. Love your show!
@Hyxtryx
@Hyxtryx Жыл бұрын
There's no such thing as a white laser. And in fact, lightbulbs don't produce pure white light either. They are tricking your eye.
@WalterSamuels
@WalterSamuels 7 ай бұрын
Exactly. This is bunk.
@AJD...
@AJD... 6 жыл бұрын
Can we PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE have more of quantum mechanics experiments? Please
@SirPhysics
@SirPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
Nice video, but you were a bit off-base when you started talking about the momenta of photons in the phosphorescence of the glow in the dark paint. Light having momentum isn't really relevant to that particular phenomenon. That comes into play when you talk about things like Compton scattering (particles being deflected by light) or the photoelectric effect (electrons being ejected from atoms by light). Your explanation is mostly correct and I don't mean to be pedantic, but these demonstrations are about energy, not momentum, and you should not use the two terms interchangeably. The reason phosphorescence cannot be explained by the wave model is, as you say, the energy carried by a wave is related only to its amplitude. Thus, an intense beam of red light can have more energy in total than a dim beam of blue light. However, no matter how intense the red light, it cannot excite the atoms in the paint. This tells us that there are particles within the beam of light which interact with the electrons individually that these particles of light must have the correct amount of energy to interact with the electrons in the paint or the electrons will not be excited, and that the energy of each particle of light is different for different wavelengths of light. That said I always enjoy your videos and there are a few I show in my classes every year. Keep up the good work.
@earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542
@earthbjornnahkaimurrao9542 6 жыл бұрын
SirPhysics - is it similar to a narrow band pass filter?
@SirPhysics
@SirPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
They're related in the sense that both have to do with the specific energies of light which can be absorbed by a material. All materials have different ranges of the spectrum which they will not interact with, and other ranges that they will. Glass for example, is (mostly) transparent to visible light because the energies of those frequencies of light do not correspond to any available energy level transitions or vibrational modes within the glass, but at the same time is completely opaque to infrared light. You can say the same thing about your skin; it is opaque to visible light but transparent to something like x-rays. Whether light passes through or is absorbed by a material comes down to the available energy levels in the atoms or molecules of that material and how they compare to the energy carried by photons of different "colors" of light.
@coyotecom
@coyotecom 6 жыл бұрын
I figured it was wavelength of the light having different effects on the material due to the peaks and valleys hitting the electrons at different speeds. Red wavelength might hit them head on and pass through, but that's not enough momentum to get them into the excited state; blue wavelength would slap into them sideways, the speed between it being at its peak and valley being much higher, and imparting more energy than being hit head on. I mean, red and blue light both move at C in a vacuum, but the blue wave is covering more ground and has to be moving "faster" to maintain the same forward speed. Like two cars swerving between pylons, the red one is weaving gently between pylons that are like, 20 meters apart, the blue one is swerving every 3 meters, but they stay head to head. The blue car would be much more energetic. /never studied physics
@bigsmall246
@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын
@@coyotecom yeah you're wrong. If two particles are travelling at the same speed, they would cover the same amount of ground in the same amount of time.
@bigsmall246
@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын
Momentum is correct. The energy of any particle (including photons) can be expressed as a multiple of planck's constant and the momentum.
@bradandsusan96
@bradandsusan96 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. That was very articulate. Not everyone can explain the two slit and particular properties of light in a way that makes sense. I can tell you enjoy teaching
@spark_y4893
@spark_y4893 4 жыл бұрын
So true level of knowledge.. I've seen 100s of videos on atoms and electrons but nobody could tell so clearly that how electrons move like you explained it.. would be very great full to watch a detailed video on explaining all about atoms, electrons and quantum mechanics.. and how they work and how are they different in all elements? Thanks :)
@basseldahdouh8736
@basseldahdouh8736 6 жыл бұрын
Titles like these blow my mind into pieces
@greensky01
@greensky01 6 жыл бұрын
Bassel Dahdouh your mind is made up of over a trillion cells!
@sohamtalekar7820
@sohamtalekar7820 6 жыл бұрын
Nice and very informative Love the hard work you put into each video mate
@kapitannwel
@kapitannwel 2 жыл бұрын
this is my first time seeing the double slit experiment in actual. thank you!
@whatitmeans
@whatitmeans 3 жыл бұрын
It is possible to make that "Lit paint" glow when flashed with an ordinary commercial green light laser pointer??? If so, could you make a glowing interference pattern???
@kylevardy1325
@kylevardy1325 6 жыл бұрын
Isn't the laser pointer a red light you said that red light cant light up the lit
@robertoarmstrong7317
@robertoarmstrong7317 6 жыл бұрын
Kyle Vardy I don’t understand either.. every club that I’ve ever been to that was totalllllly Liiiiiit!!!! Was full of red lights and red lazers.. are u telling me if thoze lights were blue my boogie nightz would have been even more Lit??? Because I don’t think that’s possible.. bcoz I get like.. suuuper Lit..
@jjjubies2767
@jjjubies2767 5 жыл бұрын
Yea Kyle your right
@adamart8719
@adamart8719 5 жыл бұрын
And it didn't
@rg.g2704
@rg.g2704 5 жыл бұрын
I was thinking about it all the fucking time.
@t07minas
@t07minas 5 жыл бұрын
only because it behaves like particle if it would behave like a wave it could charge the lit doesnt matter what colour
@workhardism
@workhardism 6 жыл бұрын
My quantum mechanics calculations show a 100% probability of you having over 800,000 well deserved followers! Great channel. Congratulations.
@sabeehb9514
@sabeehb9514 2 жыл бұрын
Great video. A question that I find never explained in any double slit video - if we fire single particles at the slits surely we aim them at the central block rather than at one slit or other right? If so then the expectation should be no pattern at all as should hit the central block. However actually goes through one or other slit, this must mean the single particle is bending its path once decides which slit to go through. Surely it is just as amazing that the particle decides to veer off a straight line as the overall result of the pattern made?
@Hyxtryx
@Hyxtryx Жыл бұрын
A single photon goes through both slits somehow (refraction?) and winds up as a single photon again when it hits the paper. You STILL wind up with an interference pattern after many single photons are fired. If you try to measure which slit it goes through, then it goes through only 1 slit, and you lose the interference pattern. If you try to measure which slit it goes through *after* it passes the slits but before it hits the paper, you still lose the interference pattern. So it's like the light "knows" you are about to measure it and picks one of the slits, even before it reaches your measurement device.
@sabeehb9514
@sabeehb9514 Жыл бұрын
@@Hyxtryx thanks well said, yes I know what you say. My point is subtly different and never explained by any videos. A double slit by definition has a central barrier. Also to be a fair experiment you must aim your single photon at the central barrier, else you are automatically giving the photon a known path of one slit or the other. So the photon comes to the slit and it must 'see' a big barrier, so either it carries on and goes straight through the barrier missing all the atoms in its way or goes through one or both slits. But to do so it must have not travelled a straight path ie must have bent towards one or other or split into 2 and went through both and reformed. Maybe they do split eg have 2 joined halves then reform after, just a guess. But we need to be able to explain the phenomenon BOTH on a particle basis and a wave basis.
@nilebrixton8436
@nilebrixton8436 Жыл бұрын
thank you for this fascinating and well explained video. I still don't quite understand quantum physics but also feel I'm getting closer to understanding it
@versatilesamuel1607
@versatilesamuel1607 6 жыл бұрын
You just explained my 10th grades lessons in 11 minutes... and I actually understood it this time.
@vinodkumar-wm3oq
@vinodkumar-wm3oq 6 жыл бұрын
Nice and informative video there, great job!! Also Can you calculate the speed of light?
@ikramaghouri6786
@ikramaghouri6786 2 жыл бұрын
I've seen many of your videos but this video made me subscribe your channel. Good job man👍🏼
@reveirg9
@reveirg9 Жыл бұрын
Came in expecting to learn about light, ended up learning about quantum mechanics. Great content!
@lionheart1522
@lionheart1522 6 жыл бұрын
You actually don't need two slits you only need the center break. You can do this with a sewing needle (not necessary to use the eye of the needle)
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
True
@NonstopNiels
@NonstopNiels 6 жыл бұрын
03:10 This thing is Lit !
@youexpectedausernamebutitw4578
@youexpectedausernamebutitw4578 6 жыл бұрын
Nonstop Niels a man of culture
@marcoschneider8115
@marcoschneider8115 6 жыл бұрын
I understood that reference
@ajwdetjbb
@ajwdetjbb 5 жыл бұрын
Ayyy
@kronati
@kronati 5 жыл бұрын
Literally
@peterwan7945
@peterwan7945 5 жыл бұрын
He know
@markmuss1
@markmuss1 3 жыл бұрын
Spectacular job of demonstrating and explaining that thorny issue.
@RaymondRChammas
@RaymondRChammas 2 жыл бұрын
Absurdly inexpensive experiment for the magnitude of information conveyed. :) Cleared up a few things for me
@moodberry
@moodberry 3 жыл бұрын
When I took physics in college my prof taught us about light being both wave and particle. I have puzzled over this since then (mid-1970s) But you said something that tied it together when you showed that it isn't just light, it is everything else too! Now I have even MORE to puzzle over! :)
@pavel9652
@pavel9652 2 жыл бұрын
Now, when you feel good about yourself, take a look at QFT - Quantum Field Theory ;)
@noahhorwitz5644
@noahhorwitz5644 2 жыл бұрын
The more questions you answer the more question you will have
@Xeno_Bardock
@Xeno_Bardock 4 жыл бұрын
"Light cannot be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, involving alternate compressions and rarefactions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether." - Nikola Tesla. No bulb emits light waves just like a person in the middle of the pond moving his hands in water is not emitting any water waves. Light is the ether itself under vibration. And if there are particles of light, they are particles of ether acting very much like how air acts for sound waves.
@michaelschardan5312
@michaelschardan5312 4 жыл бұрын
Good old Ken
@neonlight1214
@neonlight1214 3 жыл бұрын
What a weird confusing sentence from the most intelligent scientist and the one who successfully made electricity usable in everyday life!
@Resonant87
@Resonant87 2 жыл бұрын
I agree! Light is just waves. Not sure if longitudinal or transversal. I would suspect transverse(even though tesla said otherwise..) Saying light is a particle just because certain frequencies act diferantly is the stupidest justification I have ever heard of. Example.. I think sound is a particle because some frequencies can brake glass...
@Xeno_Bardock
@Xeno_Bardock 2 жыл бұрын
@@Resonant87 Theoria Apophasis has videos talking about light.
@romeogreen107
@romeogreen107 3 жыл бұрын
one of the most enjoyable and knowledgeable channels ....just love it 💖
@KoyasuNoBara
@KoyasuNoBara Жыл бұрын
I came across the double slit experiment being mentioned in a game. Immediately searched "double slit experiment action lab," and sure enough, you explained it well. :)
@jamesgearyjames
@jamesgearyjames 5 жыл бұрын
I'm confused by one thing: would the double slit laser make the paint glow if a blue laser was used? I thought red light couldn't make the paint glow at all
@amaankadri9173
@amaankadri9173 5 жыл бұрын
James Geary yes it would make the paint glow but he showed us about the red light because even though red light has higher amplitude, what we need to make the paint glow is higher momentum of the particles and not the amplitude!!
@WalterSamuels
@WalterSamuels 7 ай бұрын
In other words, his experiment made no sense and invalidates his claim. @@amaankadri9173
@chrisraymond2289
@chrisraymond2289 2 жыл бұрын
Red is just the wrong frequency to get that resolution
@GuitarsonMY
@GuitarsonMY 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. This helped me understand the Particle-Wave Duality better
@roberthelms1737
@roberthelms1737 3 жыл бұрын
Do not believe this conclusion.
@werneckpaiva
@werneckpaiva 3 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation with such a simple experiment. Thank you!!!
@Shagwellsback
@Shagwellsback 6 жыл бұрын
We need more guys like you on KZfaq! Acually educating the public instead of making them dumber like some other youtubers:) thanks bud and keep up the good work!
@ancient47
@ancient47 6 жыл бұрын
Maybe light is particles which move in waveforms 🤔
@Aem2512
@Aem2512 8 ай бұрын
This is the may favorite video so far in your channel. I have other favorites too!
@Yeahua
@Yeahua 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks you for the amazing video brother! You are awesome on a high level.
@mansiprajapati4863
@mansiprajapati4863 3 жыл бұрын
When I had studied this topic at first time I was not able to feel this and I had started to ignore it, but after seeing this video,I can say only one word that is wow😱
@HeikoWiebe
@HeikoWiebe 2 жыл бұрын
You don't even need the laser. I did the double-slit with my students using a sharp knife, a piece of thin cardboard, and the the flash light on their phones.
@notdonaldst
@notdonaldst 2 жыл бұрын
Very cool video. Good explanation- easy to understand. Thanks for posting.
@charmelink
@charmelink Жыл бұрын
7:29 You think I wouldn't notice what you were drawing there 😆 good job LOL
@tobi3571
@tobi3571 6 жыл бұрын
Ok today i'm going to put a huge like
@ChallengeTheNarrative
@ChallengeTheNarrative 6 жыл бұрын
Tobi 👍
@win_failure
@win_failure 6 жыл бұрын
You: Today I'll do an experiment that proves light is a wave. Me: But it has particle properties too! You:Then I will do an experiment that shows light is a particle. After you're confused, I'll explain you what light is. Me: Savage af dude! Savage. As. F.
@rahulsawant_pikachu
@rahulsawant_pikachu 6 жыл бұрын
Aditya Renukdas xD
@win_failure
@win_failure 6 жыл бұрын
David 😂😂
@Xiwter
@Xiwter 6 жыл бұрын
David cringe? You 13 years old? Everything is cringe to you
@eclipsegaming4642
@eclipsegaming4642 6 жыл бұрын
You : (Ur comment) Me : so what do I do now You : start dancing Me : with your sister 😁
@win_failure
@win_failure 6 жыл бұрын
WTF?? WTF is wrong with you?
@mouseminer2978
@mouseminer2978 3 жыл бұрын
Beautifully put. I must say you have the skills. Can you also make a video about how a quantum computer actually works. Thanks in advance. Keep up the great work.
@swedensy
@swedensy Жыл бұрын
There is no a working quantum computer.
@The_Tormented_One
@The_Tormented_One 2 жыл бұрын
I always learn something from your videos. You are my practicals teacher. 😊
@ShauryaSingh-ts2oc
@ShauryaSingh-ts2oc 6 жыл бұрын
We should call light a warticle
@Viewable11
@Viewable11 2 жыл бұрын
One error: _"Light is a wave therefore it is everywhere"_ is false, because light is an electromagnetic wave that has an origin point and a direction and a velocity. An electromagnetic wave moves through space from point A to point B over a specific duration defined by its velocity.
@choke666
@choke666 2 жыл бұрын
How odd. I'd say it's a 'rate of induction' as opposed to a velocity.
@Viewable11
@Viewable11 2 жыл бұрын
@@choke666 An electromagnetic wave is not induced while it travels.
@KennyT187
@KennyT187 2 жыл бұрын
According to quantum electrodynamics, a photon is the smallest possible unit of vibration in the quantized electromagnetic field which does not have a well defined trajectory because of quantum uncertainty, ie. the energy packets of EM fields are not localized untill they are absorbed somewhere and only then you can say "a photon traveled from point A to point B" but this does not contain any information about the route of the photon. Look up Feynman path integrals.
@alexandrudanciu7874
@alexandrudanciu7874 Жыл бұрын
Was not an error, but a way of saying...linked to the context of the explanation.
@Yo-rs1pi
@Yo-rs1pi Жыл бұрын
Sound waves are the tubes and the particles travel through for example if we can make a lone sound wave we can put particles inside the tube
@roadnottaken2780
@roadnottaken2780 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Double slit experiment was the very first video that I watched on youtube as far as I can remember. It was back in 2006 or 2007.
@gabrielrusso6920
@gabrielrusso6920 5 жыл бұрын
I love your videos. You have a great way of making the esoteric understandable. Can a wave 'wave? and can a particle be particularly particulate?
@Zurenza
@Zurenza 6 жыл бұрын
Photon's are weird, so is quantum mechanics but i'll try my best to explain this issue. To put it simply, photon's together create "Waves" but they themselves do not move in "Waves", so imagine you had a bunch of people and they were standing in a really wavy line, that's what photon's do. God this ones hard, Photon's are Particles, yes but because they are Fundamental Particles, Quantum Physics prevents us from Studying them directly because of the Quantum Uncertainty Principal. So there are a couple theory's for how individual Photon's work, one is that they each move in a wave pattern, in little packets together but this probably isn't true since it conflicts with experiments. The second is that Photon's move in a straight line, but create waves when they are made together, since Photon's are never made as Individuals and usually come in Packet's based on how they were created which produces their Wavelength and gives us different types of Light, Heat and even the entire Electromagnetic Spectrum. So now to help understand a little more, i'm going to say Photon's travel in straight lines but because of the amount of energy they contain they bunch together in Packets and that's when they create their Wave Pattern that we see in Laser's, remember there are trillions of Photons in that tiny spot so they create a wave and the energy that was used to create them makes that wavelength fairly long, resulting in Red Light. Also it's important to understand that Photons and Light Ray's are different, Light Ray's are created by large quantities of Photon's, and like i say these Ray's come in the form of "Waves". Final point, now on to the Lit Substance, light when it interacts with Protons and Neutrons transfer's it's energy to them, or as you put it "Momentum", while they do have Momentum it's easier to say that Photon's contain a certain amount of energy because we can't measure the Velocity of a Photon at the same time that we Measure it's Position, the quantum uncertainty principal. So the reason why a Blue Light is able to excite the molecules of Lit is because it simple contains enough energy to, if you shined an Ultra-Violet light on it it would shine much more, and if you shined X-Ray's on it, it would still shine because all of those have plenty of energy. Now when it comes to Gamma-Ray's the photons have so much energy that they actually start to tear things apart on the Subatomic level, that's why Gamma-Ray's are so dangerous, and the Lit would probably shine rediculously bright under it before probably being destroyed.
@reter03
@reter03 4 жыл бұрын
In the Feynman lectures volume 3, it states you can set a photon gun too shoot singular photons through and record the results over time and you will get the interference pattern as long as you don't know which slit the photon is coming through.
@esatacikgoz2016
@esatacikgoz2016 5 жыл бұрын
Man I have a hard time understanding these thingies about quantum mechanics, I am a 10 year old but I lovvvvvvee your experiments, I just can't stop watching them, thanks for making this channel, I am more of an advanced learner so I like to learn things above my level and your channel is just purrrfect for that, and thats why I subscribed by the way :)
@WillyDrucker
@WillyDrucker 5 жыл бұрын
If light is travelling at "the speed of light" it would have no causation or time. To an outside observer wouldn't light exhibit all possible states and travel as a wave of all possibilities? The moment you interact with it's location this would force a causation event. So is light really just a particle after all?
@aaroncurtis8545
@aaroncurtis8545 4 жыл бұрын
That's like, one of the smartest random comments I've seen on youtube.
@wilsongomes3360
@wilsongomes3360 Жыл бұрын
smart
@tm67245
@tm67245 Жыл бұрын
Such a clear, simple and thoroughly explained wave particle duality
@Alex_441
@Alex_441 4 жыл бұрын
It's really just a wave traveling through the aether though
@elizabethmeghana9614
@elizabethmeghana9614 3 жыл бұрын
read michealson and morley experiment
@itzkurt179
@itzkurt179 6 жыл бұрын
Could you do some experiments with gamma rays
@sudiptoits
@sudiptoits 3 жыл бұрын
Oh yes? And get the whole Earth destroyed?
@trashmeme2328
@trashmeme2328 3 жыл бұрын
@@sudiptoits Nothing of value would be lost!
@sudiptoits
@sudiptoits 3 жыл бұрын
@trash meme the gamma rays would destroy the Earth and that means you too
@sjcanalita3093
@sjcanalita3093 4 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Simple and concise, just what i need to explain double slit experiment to my kids.
@gamingargamingar708
@gamingargamingar708 5 жыл бұрын
I am a high school student, and I learn more from one of these ten minute videos than i learn over ten days in school.
@sweateryoshi4026
@sweateryoshi4026 2 жыл бұрын
We covered this stuff in school. Might be a country thing as I am from germany.
@vetrivendhan6122
@vetrivendhan6122 3 жыл бұрын
Conclusion: So the Naruto's Rasengan also has both particle and wave property.
@abhinavgaming2110
@abhinavgaming2110 3 жыл бұрын
??
@vetrivendhan6122
@vetrivendhan6122 3 жыл бұрын
Just for fun 😁
@handysoap
@handysoap 3 жыл бұрын
lol yes
@shubhamsandilya5827
@shubhamsandilya5827 3 жыл бұрын
seems u have studied quiet a lot about my jutsu's
@araitol3935
@araitol3935 3 жыл бұрын
Naruto's rasengan is basically a wind. It's futoon element or wind element.
@sritabhpriyadarshi4233
@sritabhpriyadarshi4233 6 жыл бұрын
U forgot to give credits to Einstein, youngs, huygens, de broglie 😅
@MetalKabu
@MetalKabu 6 жыл бұрын
and schrödinger, planck, heisenberg
@jasonleejames_official
@jasonleejames_official 2 жыл бұрын
The glow pigment doesn't care that the laser was low or high intensity but that its wavelength was too low. The commonality between the Lightbulb that didn't light it and the laser was they were both in the red wavelength. If you used a blue or green laser it would most likely work, as the lightbulb that did light it despite being weak had multiple bands of light higher than the red laser. A different way to think about it is not that the Lasers intensity mattered but its frequency, the red is too slow to push the pigment, like the delay between waves isn't enough to keep it charged or the red particle doesn't have the free electrons there's something about the red light that regardless of its amplitude wont ever push the pigment. Unless you maybe try a higher grade red. Ofc any future tests with stronger or weaker lasers should have eye protection stay safe!
@dineshm4155
@dineshm4155 2 жыл бұрын
Ydse I didn't thought this will be this cool thanks for the demonstration 🤓😍
@dhruvnayi1737
@dhruvnayi1737 6 жыл бұрын
Congratulations for 800k subscribers I'm Dhruv from India
@greensky01
@greensky01 6 жыл бұрын
Digital infinity congratulations for being Indian.
@dhruvnayi1737
@dhruvnayi1737 6 жыл бұрын
greensky01 Thanks
@Gustavobc0
@Gustavobc0 6 жыл бұрын
Would be stellar if you enabled public subtitle contribution; this is a great video and I wanna get my quantum chemistry prof to show it in class, but not everyone speaks English and the automatic subtitle/translation is really subpar so I would try adding the translated subtitles myself but that's not enabled here
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
Ok I just enabled it.
@Gustavobc0
@Gustavobc0 6 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Thanks so much and keep up the great work!
@Gustavobc0
@Gustavobc0 6 жыл бұрын
Just submitted the complete translated captions but I think they need approval? Don't really know much how the other side of it works, but thanks again for enabling it!!
@TheActionLab
@TheActionLab 6 жыл бұрын
Ok I approved it
@Gustavobc0
@Gustavobc0 6 жыл бұрын
The Action Lab awesome man, thanks! I'll try letting you know if I get my prof to show the video in class, we're approaching this very subject soon :)
@noahway13
@noahway13 Жыл бұрын
This guy is so much better than other science channels like the Science Asylum, or Arvin Ash, etc. I watch them and don't feel I can intuitively understand any better. They always gloss over or hide behind math to explain the hard part. And the comment section is full of compliments and adulation. But the people don't REALLY understand. They just parrot the equations and the same ol' talking points. I feel it is like having to explain a lawn mowers operation to a child over the telephone. The child can say they know how the machine works-- the battery turns the engine causing the pistons to move to up and down in the block and that process pulls air thru the carb and the carb mixes air and gas utilizing the venturi effect, blah, blah... Then, after hearing several times, the child can then say they understand a mower just because they can parrot the words w/o actually knowing what the words mean, like a cam shaft. I often watch this guy and say, "Ooooohhhh, NOW I see..."
@fortis7014
@fortis7014 3 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much.. u r doing wonderful stuff.. Ur videos helps to clear my doubts...
@vitankarshreyas
@vitankarshreyas 3 жыл бұрын
Can you please try doing the same experiment...but this time, put an observer or indicator or camera which will collapse the wave function of the light... It will be fun to watch what happens with the lit paint :)
@subratvishwas611
@subratvishwas611 3 жыл бұрын
Delayed choice quantum eraser experiment.☺
@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475
@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 3 жыл бұрын
The observer is anything in an open system that interacts with the closed quantum system. ...So the paper counts as the 'observer'. (You just want more videos, don't you? ;)
@das_it_mane
@das_it_mane 3 жыл бұрын
"Observer" doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not "something looking at it", it's literally anything interacting with it.
@grains425
@grains425 6 жыл бұрын
I am sorry but I have to correct one mistake. Light from a light-bulb doesn't work not bcuz light is "curved" but bcuz it is not monochromatic. In order for the experiment to work all light coming from the source has to have the same wave lenght (which is most efficiently duable with a laser) therefore it has to be monochromatic. Back in the day, when this experiment was initially done it was done by a simple source of light and a monochromatic lense put in front of it, so the wave lenght would be the same. That's why the experiment doesn't work with a light bulb or with initially 2 different sources, not bcuz light is "curved" (to be fair I don't even know what he ment by that)
@grains425
@grains425 6 жыл бұрын
Also blue light has a bigger wave length than red, research before doing such an important experiment
@Manuel-cx6ob
@Manuel-cx6ob 5 жыл бұрын
It's not about the light being monochromatic or not, but it's about the coherency of the wave. You can have monochromatic sources (like a sodium lamp) that will not produce an interference pattern because they are not coherent, meaning that since the light is emitted by a lot of different atoms in different parts of the lamp, its phase is not constant, but it varies randomly. A laser creates coherent light by stimulated emission.
@auspiciousautonomous2403
@auspiciousautonomous2403 4 жыл бұрын
I've learned this before but it was awesome seeing you do it without being in a movie/film we know The Bleep. ~ However, I hate saying this, but I made at least 3 videos about KZfaq about when I click on "ALL NOTIFICATIONS" on many channels some stay, but on so many channels it keeps saying "OCCASIONAL." ~ I saved the picture for this video, saved all the description and links, sharing it on social media. - (LOVE)
@oquefizhoje
@oquefizhoje 2 жыл бұрын
It's amazing. Finaly i got it. A provability of locatiin an eletron and not the exact location. very well put.
The Attribute of Light Science Still Can't Explain
17:19
Astrum
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Crazy Material That You Can Make at Home That Actually Bends Light!
13:01
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
didn't want to let me in #tiktok
00:20
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
0% Respect Moments 😥
00:27
LE FOOT EN VIDÉO
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН
Can You Draw The PERFECT Circle?
00:57
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
I MADE A CARDBOARD SWING!#asmr
00:40
HAYATAKU はやたく
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Quantum Locking Will Blow Your Mind-How Does it Work?
17:24
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
I did the double slit experiment at home
15:26
Looking Glass Universe
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
7 CRAZY Optical ILLUSIONS And Experiments With Light!
8:10
Go Experimental
Рет қаралды 162 М.
The REAL source of Gravity might SURPRISE you...
7:44
The Science Asylum
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Funny videos billiards millions views p638
0:26
NamPlay
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Накормила депутатов 😅 #сериал #топ
0:56
Топ по Ивановым
Рет қаралды 4,9 МЛН