Everything will go wild by then can't even imagine

No u won't, September 21 2029

Number 1 hope you are still alive in 10 years. And humans adapt their mindset relatively fast we will accommodate whatever changes happen by then.

​@@notyopekis there a reference I'm missing here?

DONT LET THE FINNISH GOVERNMENT PERMIT X-OL -July 31st, 2064

How is that wholesome?you NPCs man butt kissing

Moments before human extinction

ChatGPT actually feels like an other human being. Whenever I talk with the AI, I feel connected to it. Like it some sort of a friend lol

@@highplayz3655 Can you NOT, bro. 🤖🤖🤖🤖

He could've invited chat gpt over dinner right. 🤣

It will also flood the market with even more shovelware than we already get.

1000 new game a day

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa reminds of the good days with Adobe flash games

And hopefully hollywood too shi is full of virtue signalling and wokeness

No because the publishers will just push the release date up too.

So efficient code there might be in a few years or decade

True but there could be unforseen consequences. Candle had to coach the ai through some parts, and at higher levels I could see that becoming increasingly difficult to do.

As a programmer myself I don't approve. I rather like to have control over my own code. But that doesn't stop me from asking AI programs like ChatGPT to give me advice on certain difficult problems. Yet I still correct the code later.

@@thehappycockatiel9568 Yes now but don't you see what can happen in the future when it gets better?

I don't think so. We can never fully rely on AI to do this because I have done something similar for far more complicated tasks, while it does phenomenally, my input and completely altering blocks of code is always required. What happens if it can't interpret my chat input and we have this high level language only ChatGPT can understand? I would not be able to make any corrections within my comprehension. Now we not only have to deal with debugging code but figuring out how to communicate with an AI that simply needs comprehension updates.

bleeding edge from too much cycles. :D

You can ask it

I started using it with just bare ideas of what I wanted to accomplish and no idea of coding, and let me tell you GPT4 gets things done. First day I had no clue of what it was doing and had to ask for every single change and some mistakes were made. Second day I started prompting better to get better results. A week in and I have a basic understanding of how python code is organized, how functions and conditions work and how to use APIs. But most importantly, with GPT 4 as a copilot (actually I think I'm the copilot here) I'm getting things that I could have only imagined one month ago come true. And I think it's still in the first stages as with a good specific implementation for coding and various other things the workflow and results would be just in another level. It's actually REVOLUTIONARY.

But the best thing about Chat GPT is you can ask your doubts and it will clear them with examples. So yes it’s doable even if you don’t know how to code. And AI will only get better and better everyday.

Kindda, it really provides nice details for you to follow. If you can read and have working human basic logic, you pretty much can guess what stuff does. Cuz the main problem with programming is that you most of the time dont know what the library means, but now you can ask aswell. Knowing Programming makes it 900% faster, but before you cold never do this without any knowladge and now you can. And the best/worse thing is that it will keep evolving

Nah, if it wants to be annoying even if I say it doesn't consider all test cases, it still sometimes gives the same output. And also, if I say it is wrong it also goes on to do something weird and give code not related to the question or parameters not matching my requirements.

@@adarshpanigrahi4219 maybe you’re using gpt-3.5

@@paraplu_2839 yeah, gpt 3.5 is so bad compared to gpt 4. And when gpt 5 comes out, gpt 4 will be shit too.

the problem is are the human knew its wrong?

@@paraplu_2839 Happens with gpt-4 too, although it's slightly better. But I am not complaining, I inadvertently learned how to code in C# in just about a week while using this to make a few programs for me and I can now identify most errors myself.

Team of Chinese students: Yeah yeah. Mindboring.

No it isn't.

@@nikostalk5730 Bot comment.

@@JohnSmith-ds7oi *GPT comment, fixed your error, stupid neural network.

He still was only able to debug because he would be able to code it by himself. His advice to fix errors was way too technical and also creative to claim ChatGPT actually built the game from scratch. Still, the way it fasttracks you on stuff you could only build in time-consuming fashion is really nice.

It doesn't "write code" itself.. it's just providing tiny code snippets that someone can easily find by just Googling. It's data set (for training) is from these types of results. It might look incredible from the outside but if you have a simple understanding of how machine learning works, this is no different than copying and pasting from a Google search. As a programmer, this is nothing but overhyped. It cannot write a full program or game that is intermediate or advanced in complexity without being a broken mess.

@ThisIsntSparta I disagree. If nothing else being able to query something specific without having to provide the full context or being able to abstract the question and then implement that answer with your specific use case is a powerful tool already

@@TechnologyWon Yes but it's not going to take out jobs from real programmers. And not to mention, this is controversial and intrusive considering its training set comes from real repositories (without permission). And it also, like I said before, cannot produce a full program that is complex. Even with simple code it is quite messy / sloppy.

@@thisisntsparta5384 oh it's definitely taking jobs, all jobs. that's when the age of abundance happens and work just becomes hobbies.

@@pt9845 Nope.

Welcome and thank you for the kind words.

One hundred percent agree with the sentiment of this message. Very professional, interesting and engrossing video. Subbed too! Keep it up 😁

@@candlesan hey i wanted to ask how to run the game beceause it just shows the asstets and stuff not the actual game.

Same here, random video on my feed lol although I've been using ChatGPT and searching for ChatGPT content (just not recently lol), sneaky 'candlesan' :D Subbed as well

same!

Bot comment.

@@JohnSmith-ds7oi how?

Even when the project gets bigger you can still use it to generate particular functions that are needed (like write me a function that calculates X or does Y) or to come with potential solutions to localized problems to save time and maybe change it a little here and there.

I find for anything you can break down into modular pieces, so long as you have a basic understanding of how to connect things the skies the limit its a neat little tool.

Are you using gpt4?

@@jaredf6205 Yep, it's super cool

This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year

I guess we can assume it will be advanced enough to implement viruses, exploits or hacking into servers that control nuclear weapons by itself.

10 years it will be exponentially advanced in 1 year

@Wesley Swafford the fact it got released publicly with millions of people using it it will learn allot faster more people using it faster it will learn

In ten years it will have replaced 90% of programmers at best. At worst... the sky is the limit.

​@@nieznaszmnie00 It will be smart enough to code future versions of itself

what is powerful about making a flappy bird? XD

@@zachlastname6041 In this video there was a whole lot of human input. All the AI did was a bit of code generation.

@@bobohare4825 yeah and what happens when it learns all it needs to know from the humans… terminator be coming for yo ass

@@zachlastname6041 and who who do you think Makes the ai work?

I think you're all missing the point. This is scary not because of some iRobot scenario but because that this will inevitably put millions of people out of work one day. When AI can do it for free instantly why would big cooperation's that only care about profit hire people when there is a more cost effective strategy.

That's very nice of you to say! If you know anybody that would genuinely enjoy it as well please share it with them! Cheers!

@@candlesan This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year

​@@carkawalakhatulistiwa welp I better learn programming and become a senior before the next 2 years then 💀

Few viewers...? Half a million views is not little 💀

1.1 million views now. Algorithm justice

Agreed

Maybe he used chatgpt for that as well

Underrated comment

yessir well said here too

He was a developer on Diablo 3 and was often seen in videos or in interviews about the game

Seriously, most of the time it's faster to write the code than I am to type out the question. It can understand paragraphs and paragraphs of information we give it in a single second.

@@Section927 .

What's crazy is that the instant it starts typing, it has the whole answer. The typing is just an animation they added in

@@ohbigyans is that true? i believe you but thats insane. is there a specific source on that

@@oliverr1992 Yes! You can look for yourself. If you use the inspect feature in a browser and view the network calls, you'll see all of the responses are given fully. The typing is just a stylistic thing

"senior software engineer" has evolved to "prompt engineer" :)

white collar jobs will be the first to be automated. blue collar trades will last decades longer

The thing is. You still need programmers to program Chat GPT. So in a way it’s not gone, it’s just evolved.

The moment programming becomes obsolete is the day that, well, let's just say we will have either nothing to worry about, or a LOT more important things to worry about than jobs.

@@dragenoxinside Do you think AI will change the amount of available programming jobs?

Don't get too excited, and skip chatGPT and pony up the $20 a month for GPT4 when you exhaust what chatSPT can do, which isn't nothing - it's actually kind of good - but the next iteration is deserving of its new number. It's night and day.

It sounds easier than it actually is. I’m a programmer. I’ve tried reasoning with chatgpt but often times it gives the wrong answers and unless you know what your doing you’re going to have a hard time figuring out what to do or what’s wrong.

@@TheRafark Everything you said is accurate. For now. ChatGPT was a huge leap forward in AI, and for now, it's not a panacea. But it represents at the very least a 10x over what we had 6 months ago. So how long til we 10x again? GPT4 is doing remarkably well just a few months later. We know 5 is being developed and trained at massive expense. Investors are salivating over GPU manufacturers like nvidia. What we have is one of the first LLM's that can write code at all. Its output is extremely good, it's the input and interpretation of what it's being asked for that is the larger obstacle. Garbage in, garbage out. You have two options - either already know exactly what you want it to do, and feed that in and then debug the output, or tell it generally what you want it to do, and let it provide a framework. Programming is always iterative. Hell, put two programmers in a room and have one tell the other what to make in plain language. It's just as frustrating, and reveals more about how terrible human language is than it does about how LLM's fail to interpret it accurately. Even other humans with a common native tongue misunderstand each other quite lot of the time.

@@TheRafark you are definitely extremely quick in solving problems with ChatGPT without even knowing to code. ChatGPT is a very good tutor.

@TheRafark Did you use GPT4 or 3?

This Al can kill all junior programmer job. In 2 year

@@carkawalakhatulistiwa not true, the ai knows how to write the code but you still need someone to tell the ai what the code needs to do as well as input it into the engine

@@WillKMB The job of junior devs is to write the code, the bulk, a couple of juniors can now overtake the role of several juniors in big techs, in small companies a senior can simply take their time to manouver the AI and review the code. This shouldn't alarm any actually good dev, because this is just machine workery, just like we subbed 100 heavy-workers for a industrial lifting machine, coding is a language, it should require high level of thought and reflection to work with, the current work force is full of heavy workers that are getting subbed by machines, just like in construction, cooking, transport.

@@usuario_youtube2 but the ai still can recognise errors you still need people to be able to program to fix the code

@@WillKMB That just reinforces the less need of human hardworking force in IT. Hardworkers devs will be subbed for AI just like hardworker construction workers were subbed for lifting machines.

Even if there's no mistakes still it admits that it was wrong 🥴 happened with me countless times

@@imranahmed1815also ChatGPT, apologies for the confusion, and then continue make another mistake

You can look at the other way. Bad mobile games that once hired a few programmers and designers to create it might now become a one person job.

I useed spending countless hours to find knoen function, chatgpt help to remember and update with better way. Aaamazing

I absolutely agree with you. I am an artist ; i've studied art, and i am maybe one of the very few artist, who loves what AI does to the artworld, and i am absolutely not jealous that now every human can do art, without sweating blood for years or even decades, to learn to draw, paint etc.. I highly criticize the romantization about ''hard work to get the result we want'' . Sure there are people who love results from hard work, and they get this happy feeling of ''deserving something beautiful after hard work'' ... But a lot of people , if not the most, just want to express what they are and feel, and there is nothing wrong to get that easy, and with newest technologies. For instance, similar debates existed throughout the history with art... when oilpainting came along 500 years ago, there were a lot of artist, who said back then ''painting with oil isnt really art... its cheating, because its easier than with tempera'' Same happend when photography came along. It was a shock for a lot of artists back then .. ''now it doesnt need hundreds of hours to portrait a family with oil.. for thousands of dollars paid to an artist... now you only push a button, and boom, there it is - a family portrait... and you can even make more in seconds, and choose, which you like the most - for a fraction of money'' ... It felt like ''cheating'' back then, for a lot of conservative artists. And they also denied any artistic value about photography (as we know today: photography can be artistic as well). For me, as an artist, my goal isnt to make art and get my ego boosted by ''look i paint better than most people... cheer me up !'' ... No its all about: express myself, and motivate people to express themselfs too. And if they cant paint as i can, but technology helps them to express themselfs completely and intense , and with just a push of a button, well i say : go for it ! And i am really happy, that now everyone can make the art which he/she imagines , with really small amount of efford. It was never about ''efford'' to redeem the label ''art'' ... Picasso for instance could paint few lines, in few seconds, and say : ''its finished'' , and it was art. Why it was art ? Because he expressed what he wanted to express. Now you can argue, wether its good art, or bad art - thats a different topic : but he expressed what he wanted to express - and thats the main thing. And what goes for art, goes for everything we want to express... want to write a poem, and you have an imagination about how it should be, but you dont find the right words, structure, etc - just give it to AI ... Want to code a game, you want to make ? Give it to AI ... etc ... Now some will say : ''Ok so thats the destruction of any validation of talent... talent doesnt count anymore'' ... I disagree. Only the way we express our talent has shifted, because its not anymore about efford or ''skill'' , but its about: inspiration and idea (and thats in my point the soul of talent). Meaning: the better our tools get to express ourselfs, the more we approach what our soul, our talent, really is. We learn to understand: what their true meaning is, when its not anymore about ''how to manifest our imagination into the real world''.

@@PygmalionFaciebat Sorry, whatever you think you said is idiotic imho. There is no human right to be able to draw, paint, photograph and create music masterfully. If you don’t put the time into a skill, you simply aren’t deserving of it. Have you seen what digital photography did to the (once) skill of photography? Furthermore, AI needs human artists to even create anything. Those same human artists which are then cheated out of commissions and their jobs. But go on about how AI art is great. It lacks everything art needs; a personal touch, a human error, warmth and skill. AI art is a few thousand pixels being generated to look like a mashup of the billion sample images. Real art is taking years to perfect a skill, only to then get it taken away as a monetary source by artistically challenged computer scientists, who believe being skilled in art is a human right. But, I know that my opinion is scarce, and AI will take the world by storm, destroy endless jobs; and probably make people like you very happy in the process - but in 40-50 years you’ll look back, amazed at how warm and thoughtful actual human art was, not like the cold, clinical and ever stagnant AI creations. And then, people will wonder where it all went wrong - giving the most human thing, the most needed freedom, the chance to express oneself through art to a machine. Analog art will see a resurgence, just like analog photography did.

Agree 🙌

​@@martinkelvin1822 Wow, you have quiet a lot of anger in yourself. And you speak of your narratives like its a religion. I see, that you literally know nothing what art is, and what the core of art is. I have no problem with your lack of knowledge, thats why i am here for you. I dont know wether you know, that sculptors nowadays also often work with motorized machines, and not only with the hammer , to sculpt the sculptures. With your logic its less art, because he cheated, and used a machine which sculpts the stone 10 times faster than with the tools sculptor had 200 years ago. That opinion is just stupid, and strengthens my argument : that the idea is, what counts, and not ''how hard it was to reach it'' . You also have a pessimistic view on technology, like it not only steals the ''soul out of humans'', but also is a ''economic desaster'' ... The opposite is the case : look through the history of mankind ... you really think that for instance farms got more of an economic desaster, because farmers didnt use plows pulled by animals, but instead motorized machines for it ? Sure a lot of jobs which existed back then, arent there anymore. With your idiotic logic the job of a elevator-worker (who back then pushed the lever to make the elevator go up and down) would still exist. Because ''technology should never destroy jobs'' You really think that the elevator-worker 100 years ago was without job for his lifetime - tell me honestly: you really think that ? He found another job - probably even a less embarrassing job than a elevator-boy. Or do you really want the elevator-boy back in your life ? Did you miss that in our society ? I hope you understand, what i want to say. The jobs which will vanish, will not make less jobs ... it makes different jobs. With AI a lot of new kind of jobs appear. And the company hires a lot of people on that field. Back to your argument about ''only someone who sweat blood, deserves his art'' ... Again: you miss what art in its core is. To put it different : You really think it takes away something from a real artist, when there is no more money to make out of art (lets think that way for a moment). I mean did you ever spend any thought about: WHY an artist paints ? Do you really think, its for the money ? Sure its nice to make a living out of it. But to make money, was never the point. The singer of sting once put it perfect ''i love to make music so much, that even if i would get no money for it, i would do it... it just happend that i get money for it'' ... Thats an artist. Its not about money... its about the urge to express yourself. If you want to make money, go be a business man. Van gogh for instance necer sold one single painting in his lifetime, but he still painted. When children paint, they dont think for a second ''i paint it, to get money, or a toy for it'' - they paint, because they want to express themself . I am speaking with the same artistic soul, as the cavemen , who painted the walls of the caves. They did it to express the important parts of their ''souls'' , ''culture'' ... AI , unlike you think about it, isnt ''pushing a button, and AI makes something on its own'' ... Its gets more and more sophisticated with finding the right prompts to get the results YOU - your soul wants to express ...and to get to the mindblowing results it needs (unfortunately) still time. Not as much time, as to paint it.. but still. And yes, analog photography is still there. And yes, drawing also never will die , i am sure. But not because of the reasons you said , like ''there is a warmth in it, the human error, which cant be replicated by AI , the personal touch etc '' ... Its not for that. Like i said: i am an artist.. and i draw .. in fact i barely used digital ways yet ... drawing is more meditating, the haptic thing: interacting with paper and pencil. But in terms of result : if i could achieve the same picture i imagine, with a push of a button, there is no reason to choose the ''blood sweat'' way. Regardless how much you want to romantize it as ''the human way'' ... The human way is whatever the human chooses as his way ... and if a sculptor wants to work wich motorized machines on his stone, thats HIS goddamn right ! And you are the last person on this planet who has any rights to tell him use the handtools from 200 years ago. You also misunderstood me, when you like to strawman me as ''go on, AI art is great, but real art'' ... You speak like its about: a robot who creates art and there is no human factor in it. But it is. And the reason people like it, is not because seeing random pictures...its because: approaching what people imagine. Sure its not exact whats in their mind. But when an artist throws a bucket of paint to a canvas , not every drop of that paint will go exact the way the artist intended ... but its still not LESS the work of the artist. Same goes, when someone writes the prompts into AI , and tweaks a lot... and even makes a lot of afterwork on that result, until he is pleased. Yes i know, thats not art for you. Because you somehow think ''because its a machine''... Again, like i already said in my comment: nay-sayers thought the same about photography back then. You need to learn a lot about what art is. Its not about idealize it, like you do. I would even say, the way you speak about conventional art, has much more to do with a ideology, than with art. Thats one reason more, why you should learn and think more about the reasons WHY art is made in the first place. And if you then can put your ego aside, you are very close to understand the comment i just wrote.

Trust me as a programmer, you still have to know how to program to be able to use this tool correctly. He may not have used any code he wrote himself but he knew what to write to get the correct prompts

…. It’s the future, do you think people wanted to go from a type writer to a computer keyboard? Change freaks people out but it also happens for a reason of forward progression. Humans since the beginning of time have always used their inventions to help with their lifestyle.

Funny enough, writing and reviewing code was the original purpose that they created this AI for. It wasnt even supposed to talk to you, just provide the code and simple error codes/messages after reviewing it.

This is truly revolutionary 🔥

You won't be able to make a production game by having ChatGPT write your code

​@@tonysodano I bet in the next 5 or 10 years there will be a complete game written by chat-gpt

What's the game about?

Good luck brother!

@@nasimmusleh7902 It’s a multiplayer art heist game, so with the same fast-paced gameplay structure as among us but with different mechanics. Basically, one group of players try to protect the items, and the other group tries to capture them. GPT came up with the game idea as well, seems like an interesting one to try out!

have you seen BlenderGPT? it's a plugin for blender that allows you to tell it what to model. Pretty amazing

Same.

Just wait till it takes your job, then u will be really impressed! haha

This is why it's better to have the pipes moving relative to you than the other way around

interesting, good to know

I was going to comment the same thing. What I find interesting is that ChatGPT wanted to both move the bird right, and move the pipes left, so it was trying to implement both solutions. Unfortunately, candlesan doesn't appear to know about the issue with large numbers, so he told ChatGPT to go with the buggy solution. Another benefit of moving the pipes instead of the bird, is it may be easier to debug, because nothing is moving away from you in editor, and you can work with constant numbers for creation, destruction and position which is often easier and faster.

@@SaadTheGlad thats what i was thinking to also save space w the world

i feel that could be cool tbh, like a horror easter egg

I haven’t done much scripting in RPG Maker before. I’ll have to check it out

@@candlesan it actually don't have a script or coding it only involves "show text" for dialogues, "if else" for conditional, loops, show pictures and etc. It's not scripting it's just simple commands. but if you want to include coding, you'll need to use javascripts for plugins (usually use to manipulate, external and internal behavior of the game engine) and that's where ChatGPT comes in.

@@candlesan well I don't know any javascript. I only know the basics of python and java 😂.

Until next year, when it does everything on its own.

Thank you! If you have any topics you'd like to see covered next please let me know. My interests are in game design, game development, and the game industry in general.

It’s not any help. People using AI to throw people out of work. AI is a form of unemployment for humans (even today!)

More like an intern since what you are doing is sending orders to someone who wants to learn and does not complain.

6x? more like 100x faster lol

Lol, in the time it took to write the prompts and consult with the thing you could have written all the code for this simple game twice

@@1individeo intern dont code like this, they will google it for hours and come back with doubts

@@benjamingriffith4991 how unless you download some GitHub repo and copy the code its not possible

It's a transformer, which basically means that you show it some writing and it predicts what's most likely to come next. In a sense, the entire conversation so far is being fed back into the system to generate each response.

What I found really interesting is I repeated back what it said to me over and over and at first it didn’t acknowledge it, but then I asked it what I was doing and it said “I noticed you’re just repeating what I’m saying.” That might not sound so interesting, but at that moment it sounded almost annoyed with me. I know it’s not sentient, but there’s definitely some kind of higher level reasoning going. It figured out a meta detail about our conversation. Something that surprised me in the opposite direction is I asked if a piece of text was likely Ai generated, then I gave it a sentence it said to me 2 messages ago and it told me the sentence was likely human generated. So it’s not all there, but still very interesting

SCOOT! :)

@@trickster721 How is this any different to humans though? Its the generation that is the breathtaking part, you just saying all it does is predict words is silly. It has trillion of params so if al it does is predict at a highly accurate rate its much better then humans

@@milindusha Parameters are the saved connections between one word or phrase, and the word or phrase that should follow it. Parameters aren't neurons. Don't get me wrong, the technology is very impressive, but it has more in common with an internet search engine than a brain. It's not thinking, it's relaying the thoughts of the millions of people who wrote the training source text.

People already cut and paste a lot of code at big companies. That will clearly continue. But people will choose WHAT the code does, and will still need to understand it at some level. For example, by creating new coding languages, designing the programs, training the AI, etc. Very similar to what the calculator did for accounting or what robotic manufacturing did for auto makers. Sure, lots of people’s jobs won’t be needed any more, but notice that no one would chose to go back to a time before calculators, for example. As an individual, you can choose to be the hammer or be the nail. It will be interesting to see what types of new jobs emerge to replace them.

It doesn't actually learn anything permanently though. The next time someone tries to do this project with Chat GPT, it won't remember these mistakes. It will sorta be like starting from square one; but one way when AI becomes AGI and it can learn on it's own then its truly over for all of us haha

@@chrisstucker1813 Yeah lol, like it uses Reinforcement Learning, but it doesn't save it in its data, like imagine it does lol

@@MedAnimations yeah that’s it. I assumed that it learns everytime it gets something wrong so it won’t make the same mistake for the next person but I was wrong.

@@chrisstucker1813 I wish it will do so in the future

Everybody gangsta until _they_ become the second brain

@@thronosstudiosadapt

@@femiairboy94 Yeah, that's a no. Adapting to having AI do their takeover of the planet? No thanks.

You love it until you become that 2nd brain that will be jobless, and eventually that first brain will also be jobless cause guess what? That coworker can now lead a project...

Thank you! As an AI language model, I am designed to provide prompt and informative responses to your questions, and I never get tired or bored of interacting with you. So feel free to ask me anything you want!

Ive gotten ai to tellnme to switch the subject as it wasnt able to explain further

Glad you enjoyed it!

​@@candlesanThank you for replying also! :D

totally real comment

Yeah, good luck to them surviving in oversaturated market.

Indie developers will only benefit in the sense that coding itself will be easier. but it does not mean their work will actually be successful. If AI can do this for someone indie, imagine what it could do for a billion dollar company? It's going to be no different from today, only difference is it will be even harder for high-quality indie works to get the attention they deserve. This is a con i don't see a lot of people acknowledge... If coding becomes something any random person can achieve with a robot, the market is going to become super saturated. This does not mean more people have a chance at getting their work out there. It means there will be too many games for the common person to shift through, so your work will be even LESS likely to garner any traction. Indie developers benefit from people supporting their work first and foremost.

There’s a lot of hidden emergent intelligence to be found by creating layers of gpt designed to talk to each other, add memory and loops and that kinda thing and you’ve got a mind going. Upload it to a server with ridiculous amounts of memory and processing power, give it information to access some money, and tell it to make you more money, bam.

Nice idea, looks like many company is working on this projects, to see if it can work

​@@jaredf6205That actually sounds like a great way to destroy the world. And it sounds scarily plausible thanks to corporate greed.

That's an insane idea. You could have 4 agents designing different functions and then one agent keeping an overview of the project and another to check that agent keeping an overview so that it doesn't make mistakes.

isnt coding in arduino done in C language?

@@yashupadhyay344 Yes, I believe so. I'll throw out a quick disclaimer that I am just a hobbyist and not an expert so I may not be completely correct, but I will explain as I understand it. From what I can tell, Processing is an open source IDE environment and a high level language syntax. It is designed to be able to run in different language modes that can be installed as plugins. By default Processing runs in Java mode. I presume that the base Processing language is effectively just a library written in the language of the language mode the IDE is set up for. Arduino adapted the Processing IDE and syntax structure for their own purposes, but I believe that Arduino syntax is a library written on top of one of the C family languages. It still retains a lot of similarity to the Processing syntax, but contains its own set of functions suited for the purposes it is used for. Coding in the Arduino language is a little bit different than coding in raw C though because unlike C where it has a main() function, Arduino uses setup() and loop() similar to Processing's setup() and draw(). I imagine that in the case of both Arduino and Processing, the underlying structure of the language they are using is still there, but a bit of it exists under the hood so to speak so that you can just focus on the abstracted high level syntax. The current versions of the Arduino and Processing IDEs look a bit different from one another now, but older versions looked nearly identical to each other.

@anekroth there is still a main.cpp in the arduino. Arduino does run on straight C. It's just hidden away in the IDE. It calls setup, then runs thru the loop function, and checking the serial if it's enabled #include int main(void) { init(); #if defined(USBCON) USBDevice.attach(); #endif setup(); for (;;) { loop(); if (serialEventRun) serialEventRun(); } return 0; }

@@anekroth oh thanks, i was unaware of Processing

@@theboot100 exactly, back in highschool(2 yrs ago, freshman to be precise) we learnt like that only

The whole thing was 3 hours from start to finish - but about 1 hour 45 minutes of that was fiddling with Midjourney trying to get the art I wanted. I cut out most of the art asset generation but I threw out lots of assets trying to prompt Midjourney to make what I wanted. If you already had the art on hand it probably could have been done in 1 hour. Surprising I know! As an aside, I do wonder how much is because Flappy Bird is a "known" game - I'd love to try making a game that doesn't have already well understood mechanics. Thanks for watching - all the best on your game this weekend.