No video

Canon 55mm FL f/1.2 Lens Review for Sony E Mount

  Рет қаралды 27,064

JamesClark1991

JamesClark1991

Күн бұрын

This is an unscientific review of the Canon 55m FL f/1.2 lens used on my Sony A7Rii camera.
Timestamps:
Part 1, Lens Overview - 00:18
Part 2, Adapter Overview - 00:51
Part 3, Mounting the Adapter - 01:43
Part 4, Handling/Use - 02:52
Part 5, Unscientific Testing - 03:32
Part 6, Image Quality - 05:38
Part 7, Conclusion - 06:57
LINK TO RAW FILES - www.dropbox.co...
Follow me at JamesClark1991
#Canon55mmFL

Пікірлер: 59
@afahmid
@afahmid 3 жыл бұрын
Very well planed and structured review.
@johnratliff318
@johnratliff318 2 жыл бұрын
I have had this lens for my Canon FT-QL camera since the 1970s. I'm now starting to appreciate what I have, and your video really showed me what this lens can do. Thank you!
@photog1529
@photog1529 2 жыл бұрын
I have quite a collection of Canon FD lenses (including an FL 55/1.2) from shooting film in the late 70's. I specifically picked up a Sony A7R2 so I can continue to use these lenses with just a simple adapter. I actually like this lens on the Sony body, but rarely go wider than f2...I find the bokeh at f2 very pleasing. If I didn't have this lens, I'd probably look for another Minolta-Rokkor 58/1.2 lens. One real advantage with the Sony body is the in-body stabilization. I rarely shoot without a tripod, but when I do each lens is now stabilized.
@chadj.w.anderson5473
@chadj.w.anderson5473 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. Subscribed. God bless.
@caldera878
@caldera878 5 жыл бұрын
The image at f1.2 is still usably sharp and the bokeh is pretty good. The lack of multi-coating is probably the only problem with this one but it creates that vintage character. Build quality is top notch. The aperture ring on these FL lenses clicks nicely unlike the plastic ring nFD lenses. Definitely a great bargain f1.2 vintage lens.
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 5 жыл бұрын
That's a great breakdown of the lens. The results at f/1.2 are definitely usable.
@ianhand5006
@ianhand5006 4 жыл бұрын
I’ve got the later FD SSC version, which I use on my T90 film body. I have tried it on my Fuji X-Pro 1, but I prefer the chrome nose 50mm f1.4 as it’s lighter.
@deeyammy783
@deeyammy783 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Good review. For unprofessional :) (jk) Imo, it is better than many so called professional reviews. All the best.
@atc576
@atc576 Жыл бұрын
wow amazes me the concern ppl put on fringing!! I was looking at the subject! The fringing actually looks cool.
@encellon
@encellon 5 жыл бұрын
Excellent review. Showing results, observing characteristics, and drawing reasonable conclusions -- the scientific method does not require any sort of 'professional' credentials.
@williamwyrick7074
@williamwyrick7074 3 жыл бұрын
outstanding tutorial on mounting this lens on an adapter. Befuddles many, believe me!
@stevocem
@stevocem 2 жыл бұрын
Nice review, thanks 🙏
@TheSpicyMole
@TheSpicyMole 5 жыл бұрын
A lens hood improves things dramatically.
@laythasthepaladin
@laythasthepaladin 4 жыл бұрын
Very well done video. Thank you.
@jmoss99
@jmoss99 2 жыл бұрын
Flaring? Try using a lens hood. Make one from adapter rings. I did for my other lenses.
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 Жыл бұрын
Tried that and unfortunately wide open it does zero. I still own this lens though, it has its moments!
@mosswareproaudio6328
@mosswareproaudio6328 Жыл бұрын
There are videos online with people using black construction paper rolled in a cone that is about 8" long and it works just fine. I use a series of lens adapters connected together to make a 8 or 9 inch lens hood and it works fine. I think you might consider how long the hood is before giving up on this idea.
@jmoss99
@jmoss99 Жыл бұрын
I have heard that some people paint the inside or the barrel black to minimize internal reflections. I haven't done it yet.
@mosswareproaudio6328
@mosswareproaudio6328 Жыл бұрын
You should look into what it would cost to have someone put new coatings on the lens. I have heard of people doing that.
@seoulrydr
@seoulrydr Жыл бұрын
nice vid
@Rocanrollnene
@Rocanrollnene 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video!
@yesthisisdonut
@yesthisisdonut 4 жыл бұрын
i'm very interested to see if the flaring is reduced in a later "SSC" version of this lens as those later versions supposedly have better coatings on each element.
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 4 жыл бұрын
I'd presume it would be better, but not drastically. If I ever get my hands on one I'll post a comparison.
@jorgem50
@jorgem50 3 жыл бұрын
I avoid at all cost shooting at anything wider than f2 with my 50mm f1.8 and also when I had a 50mm f1.4. I use the lenses for video.
@antonydritsas4885
@antonydritsas4885 5 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@ftlbaby
@ftlbaby 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review! I think I will pick one up. Flare be damned ; ) (I will probably use a lens hood)
@jmoss99
@jmoss99 2 жыл бұрын
My Sony A7Rii and this lens with mount weights 3 lbs.
@CardNumber9
@CardNumber9 4 жыл бұрын
Hi James, I have a similar vintage lens to the one in your video: Canon FL 50mm 1.8, mounted on my Canon 80D with an FL/FD to EOS adapter. The strange thing is, that it doesn't take sharp pictures when focus set to infinity. It only renders a sharp image when I approach the lens to an object within 20 to 30 cms (about 10 inches). Do you have any hint as to what the reason for this can be?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 4 жыл бұрын
Spacing between the lens and the camera mount sounds like it's too far? You get similar results to yours when adding a 'macro extension tube' to a lens.
@squiggmonster1495
@squiggmonster1495 4 жыл бұрын
I have the same problem. My camera is the Canon R, so I think I just bought the wrong adapter. I also have a canon 6dmii and it doesn't focus either. I'm going to try a new adapter, if they don't work then I'm going to sell the lens.
@sidekickbob7227
@sidekickbob7227 2 жыл бұрын
Late response, but it might help other users. The Canon FL,FD, and nFD, has a flange focal distance at 42mm. Your canon EF mount has a 44mm flange focal distance. In other words, the lens will not focus the image sharply at your sensor at longer distances. You need an adapter with a correcting lens inside. Otherwise you will not be able to focus the lens to infinity.
@jmoss99
@jmoss99 2 жыл бұрын
How does it focus at infinity?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 2 жыл бұрын
Not fantastically to be honest, it's ever so slightly shy of infinity I feel, but only just. This was the case with both adapters. Wouldn't be my first choice for landscapes.
@jmoss99
@jmoss99 2 жыл бұрын
These FL and FD lenses need what is known as a Conversion kit. Mounted on their original cameras they were between 4mm and 6mm closer to the film. There were kits being made, then the person died. I still like the lens for use within 6 feet at wide open. Stopped down it can reach what you said. You are making good use of it in your video. I have 2 f1.2 lenses. This one and Olympus OM-System G.Zuiko Auto-S 55mm f1.2 1974. The Olympus is Radioactive 3389 CPM (hot hot hot), but not the FL. I bought both of them this last winter. I like them both. Now this is a heavy lens at 1.05822 lbs, but there are much more heavy lenses out there. Look up the 300mm and 400mm up to the 1200mm lenses. I think the 1200mm is 65 lbs.
@HibikiKano
@HibikiKano 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Do you have an idea how the FL 55mm 1,2 compares to the FD 55mm 1,2?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 5 жыл бұрын
I do not unfortunately. I will soon compare it to the FD 50mm 1.4 though if that's of any use to you.
@HibikiKano
@HibikiKano 5 жыл бұрын
@@JamesClark1991 Qutie a bit actually. I already have an FD 50mm 1,4 It is by far one of my favourite lenses. So seeing a comparrison to an FL 55mm 1,2 would be grand :D
@gastonmartinez5979
@gastonmartinez5979 4 жыл бұрын
thanks! but... what is the name of the adapter to use this canon in the sony body? Regards
@sharifsalem
@sharifsalem 2 жыл бұрын
FL to NEX or FL to Sony E-mount
@полярник-б9я
@полярник-б9я 2 жыл бұрын
отличный обзор! тоже хочу себе такой. 58 мм не пробовали сравнивать с этим?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 2 жыл бұрын
Я не сравнивал эти два объектива. Бытует мнение, что 58-мм модель, к сожалению, еще мягче.
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085 4 жыл бұрын
Hello Clark, I have 55 F 1.2 S.S.C. and when turning the diaphragm ring, the blades do not move, does the lens need to be mounted to the camera?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 4 жыл бұрын
Doesn't need to be mounted technically but the breech-lock pin on the rear of the lens needs to be held in the correct position for the aperture control to work. This is what the adapter does for you when it's mounted to the lens and you set it from "open" to "lock".
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 4 жыл бұрын
For example shown at 02:35 in the video.
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085 4 жыл бұрын
@@JamesClark1991 Thank you very much, I managed to release it and that the diaphragm works correctly, now I have to send it to maintenance to use it, regards.
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085
@sergiorolandosantiagosanch4085 4 жыл бұрын
@@JamesClark1991 I want to use it on an A6000 and I see that you have the FOTGA brand adapter, it has worked well for you, because I have read that then the lens is a little loose, again thank you very much
@farid1406
@farid1406 4 жыл бұрын
How would one adapt this to the Leica L Mount?
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 4 жыл бұрын
Not experienced on that one sorry buddy! Leica's above my pay grade 😝
@toledojavier3619
@toledojavier3619 3 жыл бұрын
Use an FL/ FD to L mount converter. I barely got this lens today and waiting for the adapter to come so I can mount it on my Lumix S1
@lanchanoinguyen2914
@lanchanoinguyen2914 4 жыл бұрын
this lens is radioactive
@JamesClark1991
@JamesClark1991 3 жыл бұрын
I'm told it's the equivalent of a chest x-ray.
@Simon-eh5ez
@Simon-eh5ez 2 жыл бұрын
@@JamesClark1991 It's actually way less. You'd likely have to keep the lens on you for 1000 hours to equal that of a chest x-ray. Maybe don't keep it under the pillow - but normal use is completely fine. Also, i think only one of the internal lens groups contain thoriated glass on this particular model, although i have not opened one up myself yet and tested.
@rantoole7802
@rantoole7802 Жыл бұрын
The FL 551.2 is not radioactive. The former 58 1.2 is.
This vintage lens is a dream! | Canon FL 58mm f1.2 Review
12:46
Caleb Brunkow
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Adapted Canon 55mm 1.2 FL lens on the Nikon Z8
12:04
Jules Vuotto's Photo Focus
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
Kind Waiter's Gesture to Homeless Boy #shorts
00:32
I migliori trucchetti di Fabiosa
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
👨‍🔧📐
00:43
Kan Andrey
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Matching Picture Challenge with Alfredo Larin's family! 👍
00:37
BigSchool
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
SPONGEBOB POWER-UPS IN BRAWL STARS!!!
08:35
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
How vintage is too vintage? | Canon FL Lenses
11:33
Caleb Brunkow
Рет қаралды 10 М.
I Don't Know How to Feel About This - Canon FL 55mm F1.2
7:37
aChair Leg
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Most PROS use this Camera Mode 98.7% of the Time!
7:54
Jason Vong
Рет қаралды 275 М.
Canon FL Breechlock Lens Adapter Installation and Discussion
8:05
David Saylors
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Operating on (and fixing) Canon FD lenses - 50mm f/1.8
18:26
CANON FD 50MM F1.2 L The BEST 50mm Vintage Lens EVER?
9:14
Mark Holtze
Рет қаралды 180 М.
CAMERA METERING EXPLAINED: Spot, Evaluative, Partial or Center?
10:31
PhotographyExplained
Рет қаралды 99 М.
Kind Waiter's Gesture to Homeless Boy #shorts
00:32
I migliori trucchetti di Fabiosa
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН