Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS USM 'L' lens review with samples (full frame and APS-C)

Рет қаралды 513,768

10 жыл бұрын

This is a lens that is slowly becoming legendary for its sharpness - is it really all that? What does video footage look like? And is it really worth over £800 (depending on where you shop)?
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link):
USA: amzn.to/32yhQjE
UK: amzn.to/2uj0RVI
Don't confuse it with its older, non-image stabilized brother, which I reviewed a year ago: • Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 ...
If you've found this or other videos I've made to be helpful, then support me on Patreon! www.patreon.com/christopherfr...
All samples and footage taken by me on Canon 60D and 6D cameras.
Be sure to follow my Photostream on Flickr, to see sample pictures of lenses I've reviewed and to see previews of upcoming lenses, too! www.flickr.com/photos/5633426...
Music:
Shades of Spring, Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Пікірлер: 408

@lmallard3788 6 жыл бұрын

I appreciate that you include us peasants, with apsc canons, in your lens tests. Now, I am leaning toward the mark 2, with plenty upgrades, easy to see the $200 increase in price.

@nigelfeatherstone3960 6 жыл бұрын

Drake Leroy I

@NaeemaIbrahim 6 жыл бұрын

Hahahahaha

@cooper9917 6 жыл бұрын

SO TRUE! Especially if you have a Canon 7Dmk2, which is priced and compared with full frame cameras quite often.

@tridinh1011 3 жыл бұрын

@@cooper9917 in some situation, the 7dm2 is better than any fullframe that's not the 1d lineup

@alaryk3635 5 ай бұрын

Hahaha, peasants, love it. I have m50 mk2

@ktor538 10 жыл бұрын

I enjoy watching your reviews, You go straight to the point, no pointless chatter just straight informative reviews! Cheers!

@user-pd4hp6bu4q 10 ай бұрын

I am 9 years late but thank you for including APS-C in the testing! It’s solidified my decision to buy one now

@adrotoscroto6501 5 жыл бұрын

You have always been the channel that offers me the best review and brings the best answer to every question I have about a lens I'm about to buy, definitely subscribing and recommending. Thank you

@questionthis4417 4 жыл бұрын

I recently bought this lens for my canon 50D. It’s a fantastic lens every shot on this old camera looks fresh colourful sharp and always get focus right in auto focus

@surfff 10 жыл бұрын

Love your reviews!! I wish there were youtubers who did your style of review but with micro four thirds lenses!! Keep up the great work!

@runwayhub2378 8 жыл бұрын

If you live in wales like I do, then thats particularly useful, as it never stops raining. Yep, thats about right! :p

@richardpcrowe 7 жыл бұрын

My favorite lens on either a crop or full frame camera. I use it for all my portraits - humans or my rescue dogs and for at least 1/3 of my travel images... I once owned the non-IS version (before the IS model was introduced). I was a slave to bright light or high ISO but, the IS has freed me from those constraints. I easily shoot 1/3 to 1/2 of my total imagery with this lens... The 70-200mm f/4L IS lens and the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens are my two go-to lenses for travel photography. I usually carry a pair of cameras with one lens mounted on each body. Great setup!

@stephangauthier911 8 ай бұрын

9 years old video....but I just got an R6 and it made this lens even better! (I have the IS version). Still a ripper and can be had for cheap. Ppl really overpay for their gear.

@TheGroovesRus 10 жыл бұрын

Great review - well presented and good samples to backup what you are saying. Good job.

@scotie690 8 жыл бұрын

This is one of my best travel lenses. Great optics, light weight and not bulky as the 2.8. I had serious doubts before buying it but I'm totally satisfied with the IQ. Totally agree with you. Thanks so much for the great video reviews!

@MichaelMichael-og6th 9 жыл бұрын

Amazing review Chris 👏👏👏 I bought the "70-200mm f/4 IS USM 'L' after your review and it's totally brilliant/ razor sharp 😍 Keep up the good work mate 👍

@wannamlwithu 8 жыл бұрын

As always, great review! I already have a 50mm and might add this for video work when i travel to South America next year. Just need to save up a little and maybe upgrade from apsc to full frame 5Dmk3. Thanks Chris!

@smaakjeks 9 жыл бұрын

I've worked with this lens, and I agree completely. It's simply tack sharp, undistorted and fun to use. It's also a lot lighter and cheaper than the 2.8F version.

@PeterFritzWalter 9 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this wonderful review. Also for telling the truth about the noisiness of image stabilization, which I discovered myself with my Canon 5D and the 100mm fixed lens with powerful image stabilization. But a professional will always use an external mic so there is no problem. It was good you provided a shot to see how when using a tele lens without stabilization and without tripod is not a good way of using the lens. Well, about the prices of Canon lenses, let me say I agree with you that cheap Canon lenses are not worth the money, but the really expensive ones are worth *more* than the money you pay.

@aravindram871 8 жыл бұрын

Great review Chris. All your lens review are awesome. When can we see the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM on the "great wall"?

@AJGaleckiFilms 9 жыл бұрын

Your reviews are my favorite on KZfaq chris. Looking forward to getting this lens when my lens piggy bank fills up again (just dropped $799 on the Sigma 18-35).

@AshBashVids 8 жыл бұрын

I used to have this lens, and it was brilliant. May buy it again one day.

@Happymali10 6 жыл бұрын

I might buy one. Considered the non-L 300mm, but the weather sealing on this one got me. I do a lot of motorsport-photography, and on a dusty rally-stage I want the sealed lens.

@fredrikberglund9587 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the review! Very informative :)

@LittleMo-wt3gj 9 жыл бұрын

thanks for another great review Chris how does this lens with a 1.4 extender compare to the canon 70-300 L lens ?? be awesome if you did a review on that lens too

@v-22 6 жыл бұрын

Well done, I love your high standards.

@MichaelNNguyen 9 жыл бұрын

Oldie but a goodie, still mine, very light and powerful. Using along with my 5D Mark III.

@ppstix Жыл бұрын

Great video! Really helpful. Thank you.

@Showsable 4 жыл бұрын

Outstanding review!

@davidddmaoqiu 7 жыл бұрын

Nice video! It seems like you really love this lens.

@asiboy29 10 жыл бұрын

I sold my 70-200mm f2.8 non IS ang to get this one. The sharpnes is the same and the IS is a big help for me. The f2.8 sometimes gave me some blurred photos @ 200mm and when i zoom in. And so heavy. Thanks for the review

@ashwinkumar675 5 жыл бұрын

Hi, non-IS would affect only the video right? What would you say about long exposures (if mounted on a tripod anyway)

@Kalabint 4 жыл бұрын

@@ashwinkumar675 On a Tripod there is no Difference between IS and Non-IS lenses. Reason is that its recommended to switch off the IS on a Tripod to avoid the IS messing up the Pictures.

@dar00dsandstrooom3 8 жыл бұрын

Hey Chris, can you do a comparison between the canon 70-200mm f2.8. And the tamron version? Btw nice videos! You've helped me a lot in my lens selections :)

@michbest 9 жыл бұрын

Verry good review. Thanks!

@ELDK2008 9 жыл бұрын

Thanks for a great review.

@steveruss8369 9 жыл бұрын

I use this lens on my 600D and its totally amazing!! great video!!

@isktuna7077 4 жыл бұрын

I will ask you somethin, do you think that it is worth the money you spend on it, some people say that it is not worth f4 what do you think?

@TalesOfWar 10 жыл бұрын

This thing has made my short list of "things to potentially get". I'm currently saving for a 6D and would love one of these for it, or I may hold out a little longer and just go all out and get the 2.8 IS MkII. As usual your reviews are fantastic. Keep up the great work! From almost always as rainy Manchester! I think Wales beats us slightly on the "we get more rain" front lol.

@christopherfrost 10 жыл бұрын

Hehe thanks! I'd actually prefer this lens to the f/2.8 because it's so much smaller and lighter...

@BBROPHOTO 9 жыл бұрын

I shoot with a 6D and own the f4 version. I primarily shoot with primes as i value the extra light and bokeh for my work a LOT. If you're shooting with flashguns or outside then it's AMAZING inside works just fine, I've used it for events (bands etc in super low light) and because of the 6D's high ISO performance f4 is absolutely fine... BUT, I'm going to be upgrading to the 2.8 IS II because I always want the wider apertures, but seriously though the F4 is a very very good lens and the weight is perfect. The 2.8 models really do get very heavy after a full day of shooting a wedding etc... I used a 5Dmkiii + battery grip and 70-200 2.8 for a bit and trust me, you'll value the weight of the f4 :P

@zotyar6829 5 жыл бұрын

Dear Christopher would i like to know, in the nearest future would you test the new Canon 70-200 f/4L IS version II, or even the also new 70-200 f/2,8L IS version III? Both are new released lenses since June '18. Thank you for your answer.

@davemiles1409 3 жыл бұрын

had one then bought a 2.8 version , big mistake got on my nerves carrying it around so went back to the F4 that I find is just as good as the 2.8 version. thanks for the review note you are from Cardiff like myself.

@StoyanTanev 4 жыл бұрын

Great review. Is the noise from the IS are the same when taking photos? Thank you!

@rony6482 9 жыл бұрын

Thank you thank you for the review

@aneupan 4 жыл бұрын

Your voice and the background music makes the review a whole lot better. Not that the review itself isn't great.

@mardukmd919 2 жыл бұрын

great vid. is this lens still a legit purchase in 2022?

@edzeterachannel1311 4 жыл бұрын

your site is very helpful.. have you tried reviewing the Sigma 70-200 equivalent (like the HSM Macro 2 or the current Sports version). how does it perform?

@nrgspike 2 жыл бұрын

I've always wondered if there was something wrong with my lens as the IS sounds like gravel in a coffee grinder - but thanks to this video, I now know that that's just how Canon engineered it apparently. I really do love this lens though. And agreed, twice the weight and twice price for the 2.8 version, just for 1-stop and negligably creamier bokeh - uhm, no ta!

@CSXFan2013 8 жыл бұрын

Question Chris. I've been looking to upgrade my tele lens from the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III lens that came bundled with my Canon T5 to the 70-200mm. would the 70-200 be a good replacement for my old 75-300mm?

@DarrylHughes 10 жыл бұрын

Great review. Any chance of a review of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM?

@christopherfrost 10 жыл бұрын

Thanks - and that one is on my list :-)

@nickphipps8904 8 жыл бұрын

Fantastic review as always, i was considering the 85mm 1.8 as a first lens for a dslr, as i would like to start taking portraits and trying to hone in my skills.. In your opinion would the 70-200 f4 be worth the extra versitility while at a loss of low light performance.. would be using outdoors and in a studio enviroment.... many thanks

@prodigy2k7 8 жыл бұрын

70-200 is GREAT for portraits... Especially in studio environment

@ValiRossi 7 жыл бұрын

This lens would be awesome on an 80D. I might get it.

@IDIturboDiesel 7 жыл бұрын

ValiRossi I just ordered one on eBay.

@yichao8939 7 жыл бұрын

i own a 70D, i am thinking about getting it. What is ur opinion on this with a crop sensor like 70D/80D? Is it like what he said--really sharp?

@IDIturboDiesel 7 жыл бұрын

The benefit of this on a crop camera is the constant aperture but it's not much sharper on a crop camera vs the kit EF-S lens. I got the most qhality out of it when using it with my Canon 6D full frame camera.

@bobvegana4752 7 жыл бұрын

ValiRossi 80D bro here😂😂 thought the same, might just get this over the non IS version. If you have already bought it, how is your experience with this baby?

@secretsofuniverse3475 6 жыл бұрын

Hi triy this... amzn.to/2EHlA9E

@princejmy 9 жыл бұрын

Hi. Should i get this one or the Canon 70-300 F4-5.6 L lens with 1.4x extender At the moment I'm leaning towards the 70-300 because of wildlife photography Thanks in advance

@edwardchao2230 10 жыл бұрын

Hey Chris, great review. Just wondering, would you recommend getting a protective UV filter for these kind of expensive lens, or would a UV filter decrease the image quality? Do you usually use protective UV filters or not? Thanks!

@theskiboarder1997 10 жыл бұрын

I usually only use UV filters in rain or if it's dusty, sandy, etc. for protection. Otherwise, in my experience at least, the filter does take away slightly from the image quality but it's still 100% usable. TL;DR: Use filters in bad weather

@adonism02 4 жыл бұрын

Hi, should I buy this len used or the tamron 70-210 f/4 brand new? Which one is a better len ?

@JoaquimGonsalves 7 жыл бұрын

so glad to hear that it does well on APS-C too. really happy I found it on your profile. wanna check though if you have reviewed the Sigma 50-150 f2.8 can't seem to find reviews at all.

@christopherfrost 7 жыл бұрын

A review of that lens is coming very soon indeed!

@JoaquimGonsalves 7 жыл бұрын

Christopher Frost Photography yay!:)

@JoaquimGonsalves 7 жыл бұрын

:))

@christopherfrost 7 жыл бұрын

Oh, sorry! Bad news - I thought you meant the Sigma 50-100 f/1.8. A review of THAT lens is coming soon. A review of the 50-150 is...not. Sorry. It's discontinued now anyway, I think, and Sigma never made many of those.

@JoaquimGonsalves 7 жыл бұрын

Christopher Frost Photography oh all right. no problem. :) I look forward to the 1.8 review.

@uglyshooter Жыл бұрын

I’m using Canon RP. Recently I have think about RF 100-400 f5.6-8 for everyday, hiking and some landscape. I’m not into birding yet and I have 70-200 f2.8 for shooting portraits for my kids. I have a friend offering me this 70-200 f4 L IS for roughly 410 British pound while a new RF 100-400 f5.6-8 is available roughly about 500 British pound at my place. I wonder which 1 is a better choice for hiking and landscape. Oh btw I have 1.4 and also 2.0 converter Thank you

@Icemane1995 2 жыл бұрын

Would this lens be okay for say sports photography?? I have an 850D. I just want something entry level to see if I like doing it before committing to spending a lot of money.

@ktor538 10 жыл бұрын

I'd like to see a review on the others in class 70-200mm. Like Canon 2.8 If you get a chance to shoot with that lens.

@nicaheat 4 жыл бұрын

Do you think this will work well on Canon M50? I would not use it to do video as I am not interested in video but for wild life photography.

@gunnarjensen5910 7 жыл бұрын

Using higher ISO makes the camera more responsive in video-mode ?? Or better to use manual focus or the AF-ON button ??

@ShubhDasgupta 8 жыл бұрын

Awesome Video as usual! I am a proud subscriber Christopher. Will this work with Canon 1100D?

@christopherfrost 8 жыл бұрын

+Shubh Dasgupta It sure will :-) all Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera, except EF-M lenses

@russellvernon4214 10 жыл бұрын

Would you recommend this but non is and eos 700d or the eos 70d and save up to get this but non is later ? i currently have an eos I000d and i feel like i need to upgrade any help would be great. thanks in advance

@pgm_2576 Жыл бұрын

Can you also do a review for canon 70-300 IS USM lens? To differentiate them, they seems like the same with their qualities tho

@BluNoodles-ic5fi 5 ай бұрын

Thank u for the noise at 3:00. I was worried mine was bad or something

@YassineSABRI00 2 ай бұрын

LOL I said the same when I heard it, I thought mine is exaggerating LOL

@mantferv 10 жыл бұрын

Hi thanks for the video, im about to choose to buy the 70-200f/4 usm l (no image stabilizer) do you think would be fine for my portraits (studio/outdoor) portraits purpose? thanks

@TalesOfWar 10 жыл бұрын

If you're doing video or shooting stuff that moves, go with IS. If you're shooting stuff mostly on a tripod of things that aren't moving then the regular version should be fine. Something to note though, this is optically better than the non IS version. It's sharper with better colour reproduction etc. It's hard to notice unless viewed side by side and both lenses take incredible images, but it's something to be aware of. I'd suggest you hire both of them out for a day or two and see how they perform for you. Much cheaper than buying one then deciding you should have gone with the other lol.

@mrcoolwebsworld 7 жыл бұрын

I have found out that the canon 1.4 tele does not work on this lens if some settings are set as it locks the transfer to the card and you have to open the battery compartment to reset..lens correction being one.

@josephjohnson1464 3 жыл бұрын

You sold me on this lens. I am going to get it soon

@dciccoritti 8 жыл бұрын

Hi Chris. Enjoy all your videos. You have the greatest voice on KZfaq. I'm looking at this lens for sports photography, namely photographing my kids baseball games. Just wondering if this would be good for video also. I'm debating whether I should get the IS and do both photography and video or get the non IS for photography and the new Canon 55-200mm STM for video. Is turning on image stabilization when mounted on a tripod ok with either lens? I've heard both yes and no. You're thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks :-)

@christopherfrost 8 жыл бұрын

+Davide Ciccoritti I'd be tempted by getting the non-IS version and the new 55-250 STM, as the 55-250 STM is nicely optimized for video in all kinds of ways. All the best

@subhodeep090 9 жыл бұрын

is this better than tamron 70-200 f2.8 vc ?

@travelanddrones 6 жыл бұрын

Ok. Thks for answering.

@travelanddrones 6 жыл бұрын

Hi Christopher, very good video. Could you make one with sport videos and photos using this same lens? I'm planning to get this one to be used in amateur and /or school / university soccer photos.. Thks

@christopherfrost 6 жыл бұрын

I don't have this lens anymore, and I don't really do sports photography

@tomvo3335 8 жыл бұрын

Hi Christ can you review canon 70-200mm f4 is with canon 1.4 and 2x tele converter

@Mr.ReanuKeeves 10 жыл бұрын

Are these "noisy" when on video mode like the other usm kit lenses?

@desiredheat4421 6 жыл бұрын

Hey Chris, have you tested this lens with a converter?

@francisjunto 9 жыл бұрын

have you try adding a 2x or 1.4 extender to this lens? im using 70-200f4 non IS version,, im thinking of buying an extender.. :) thank you..

@kaapiosimpanssibonobo1864 Жыл бұрын

Hey, great review! I'm only a decade late. Anyways, I have a chace to purchase this lens in great optical and mechanical condition, no internal dust, mold or scratches. The price is 500€ including the hood, tripod collar and an uv-filter. The serial number indicates that this particular lens is manufactured in 2006. Is the price okay considering the age? Thanks!

@BrickHario 4 жыл бұрын

should I buy the 1:4L or 1:2,8L for indoor sports? Is 1:4L enough or not?

@darrensmith7949 2 жыл бұрын

Hi quite an old topic, but hopefully still active. I am considering buying this version 2nd hand to go with an Eos R, for an upcoming trip to South Africa. I have a tamron 35-150 osd, and tamron 100-400mm. Can anybody say if this lens give faster autofocus along with any iq improvement over above lenses or would it just stay in the bag?

@eusnebi 10 жыл бұрын

wonderful lens!

@khambu53 10 жыл бұрын

nice review!!!!!!

@Robbe902 Жыл бұрын

I was able to get hold of a version for almost €430 yesterday. I can only confirm what is said in this video. the sharpness is indescribable across all focal lengths and there is definitely still enough light on the sensor, despite F4. I've been photographing with the "big" brother, F2.8, for the last three years. unfortunately this lens did not have a stabilizer, which limits its use to extremely fast shutter speeds or a tripod. I don't even want to talk about the weight saved (F2.8 1400g, F4 720g). The bokeh is (in my opinion) negligibly sharper. I use the lens on a 90D and can only recommend it to anyone who photographs in an actual working range of up to 200m. a word about the stabilizer: it takes about half a second to settle (and is quite loud) but then it's rock solid.

@ignacioconde2219 10 жыл бұрын

I feel bad. I was quite excited by buying the old one (non IS) seems that I have made a wrong decision and not saving for this one =/

@gurudeclan 10 жыл бұрын

How does it perform in low light? Thanks for another great video

@christopherfrost 10 жыл бұрын

Well it has a maximum aperture of f/4, so only okay

@ecliqxse9591 6 жыл бұрын

I just preorder the sony a7iii , im thinking of buying this lens for sony a7iii .

@papijelly 3 жыл бұрын

Is it still worth it to buy this lens the IS version f4 for about 500$ ? I know the mark2 is about 900-1000 . Used ofcouse

@MikeDKelley 9 жыл бұрын

Based on your excellent review (as always) and a note written on the Canon site (by a guy who is recommending lenses for the 70D -- he says the 17-55 2.8 is the first lens he would always have, but this one comes in as another essential) I've *almost* decided this will be my second lens. Given that I know you really like the 55-250 variable aperture Canon STM lens, I'm wondering what you would advise to someone like myself who is looking for a really good zoom. The pluses for this lens are the image quality, of course, as well as build and weather proofing. The downside is that it's much heavier and has a smaller range than the 55-250 (and most likely much noisier IS and less smooth AF). The downside to the 55-250 is that it's variable aperture (which is a big minus in my book). If cost were no particular object (since I'm only going to use two or three lenses at most for my 70D work, which will be mostly video although I'll do some still, and I want quality) would you choose this lens over your 55-250? I'm always curious about your thoughts, particularly since you've tested both of these.

@christopherfrost 9 жыл бұрын

If cost were no object I'd go for the 70-200, but only just, because of the nice build quality and slightly sharper pictures and better contrast. But the two are pretty close - the 55-250 really is a bit more convenient

@MikeDKelley 9 жыл бұрын

That's really helpful, Chris. I just got all my lenses (and the 70D) in the last two days and just in carrying them all around and using them I've come to rethink (for the umpteenth time) my idea about having the L lens versus something a lot lighter and cheaper. Also, I hadn't realized how excellent the modern cameras are at high ISOs and the ability to use the automatic selection (and then just control the aperture and speed manually) means I can still film at fairly low light levels. But not to belabor this -- when you say "a bit more convenient" you are talking about weight and size, right? Or do you mean the increased focal lengths? I'm just trying to get a very clear picture here before I pop for one or the other (it's particularly sensitive to me right now because the 70-200 comes with a $200 rebate good only through the end of this month, so it's not like I can just take my time and make a more reasoned decision based on my shooting experience).

@christopherfrost 9 жыл бұрын

Mike Kelley The 55-250 is smaller and lighter and has a much better focal range. I imagine that would be the lens you might prefer, really

@MikeDKelley 9 жыл бұрын

Thanks again, Chris (do you *ever* sleep? When you get married I can promise you that will change ). I suspect you are right, as the more I play around with what I've got so far (I now have the 17-55 2.8, the 10-18 variable STM and yesterday I couldn't help myself and got the 35mm 2.8) I'm almost second guessing myself even on the 17-55. While I do love it's constant aperture, the size and weight are pretty daunting for an old man like me (and I USED to carry around the full sized 70-200mm 2.8, which I still have but am going to sell). With the 35mm on (which, coincidentally, weighs the same as the 55-250mm we're talking about) it feels just about right, a great camera/lens combination to hold one handed if necessary. With the 17-55, though, I am definitely not shooting one-handed. And, as I said, I'm really impressed with the way the new cameras respond so well in low light even at smaller apertures. Yes, I can't get the blurred backgrounds I might want, but that's why I have the 35mm. So I'm thinking (just thinking, mind you) I *might* return the 17-55 and use my 35mm for those times I need a blurred background and then have lighter STM lenses to carry around. It's just a thought but right now my main concern is the decision between these two I'm talking about, and I so appreciate the thoughtful and reasoned approach you take. If you don't make a living making your video reviews, you should (get that new wife of yours to get on your back -- a good woman can do wonders, as I've found out :>).

@christopherfrost 9 жыл бұрын

Mike Kelley Thanks! Good luck as you find out what's right for you :-)

@berat9826 3 жыл бұрын

should i buy this for my canon 250d

@ajazahmed3694 4 жыл бұрын

Lovely video

@WattoPhotos 2 жыл бұрын

Would this be a good replacement for a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

@TheKwadwo14 2 жыл бұрын

Interested in this answer.

@robsmith6044 10 жыл бұрын

Chris, many thanks for your reviews. You do the best gear reviews on KZfaq. I've just about watched all your videos, and they're so helpful. Can you be a legend and review the Tamron 60mm macro, Canon EF 24mm f2.8 (non IS) and the Sigma 10-20mm f3.5. If you know anything about these lenses I'd be grateful if you can comment. I'm relying on you to save me from those buffoons at DigitalRev TV!

@christopherfrost 10 жыл бұрын

Hehe thanks :-) no plans for the Canon lens as I think it'd be better for people to just get a fast standard zoom lens. I'll think about the Sigma, and I definitely would like to do the Tamron sometime as it seems to be an undiscovered gem :-)

@Lumusphoto 10 жыл бұрын

I have the sigma 10-20 but only the f4-5.6, but I must say it is a fabulous lens!

@muhammadsyamil8726 2 жыл бұрын

70-200mm f4 vs 100mm f2 which one u recommend

@xlvi1168 8 жыл бұрын

Hi your videos are great I was wondering if the image stabilisation only applies to video mode or will it help with keeping the camera still whilst taking photos?

@christopherfrost 8 жыл бұрын

+MR RLK It works for stills or video, like all image stabilization systems :-)

@xlvi1168 8 жыл бұрын

+Christopher Frost Photography Ok thanks I am about to buy a 700d and i am torn between the Ef-s 18-200 and the 55-250 which you both reviewed. Which would you recommend bearing in mind i will use for motor sport and countryside, The 70-200 is excellent but quite expensive. Many thanks : )

@christopherfrost 8 жыл бұрын

+MR RLK Get the 55-250 STM, so long as you have a wide angle lens to go with it

@xlvi1168 8 жыл бұрын

+Christopher Frost Photography Ok thanks for the info.

@AshBashVids 4 жыл бұрын

Loved this lens - I remember saving up and buying it back in 2008, used it quite a lot on general. Ended up selling it and regretted that decision ever since. Found a 2nd hand one for £440, bought it straight away and I'm now loving it all over again on my EOS R. In really nice condition too! Absolute bargin, they easily go for £600 or more 2nd hand.

@ashwinkumar675 5 жыл бұрын

Great Video. Looking to get this (2018-2019) - non-IS would affect only the video right? What would you say about long exposures (if mounted on a tripod anyway)?

@christopherfrost 5 жыл бұрын

Image stabilization also helps you to get sharper images when you're doing stills photography handheld

@ashwinkumar675 5 жыл бұрын

@@christopherfrost great thanks!

@zvojurini 8 жыл бұрын

Hi. Thank you for your review. I have a dilemma between Canon 70-200 F2.8 nonIS and F4 IS. Advantage of F4 is stabilization which is very usefull, but F2.8 has larger aperture which is better for low light and moving subjects. Which lens is better overall in low light? Tnx for the answer.

@christopherfrost 8 жыл бұрын

+tusho Personally I think the IS would help you more. Also an f/4 zoom lens is far smaller and lighter to carry around which is a huge advantage

@adude394 8 ай бұрын

Since I'm giving my wife a new bathroom for Christmas, she's giving me this lens. I believe she's going to spend quite a bit less than I am, but no question, we're both going to be happy with our gifts!

@ggessex 9 жыл бұрын

I wonder if the slightly improved optics of the 70-200mm f/4 IS would be noticeable over the lesser optical construction of the 70-200mm f/4 non IS version for tripoded full frame video work? My supposition is that they would look the same.

@christopherfrost 9 жыл бұрын

ggessex For video work, yes, they'll look the same

@fernandofalconi1426 10 жыл бұрын

a review about the cheaper Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM would be helpful

@iRecordOS 2 жыл бұрын

Hey Chris I noticed you’ve never done the original 2.8 is L. At 900 dollars I think it’s a bargain in 2021. It’s quite heavy but it’s also parafocal.

@samirpoudel3535 4 жыл бұрын

which model of canon dslr did you use for this video. i am planning to get this lens to use for 750d. can i get the same image quality? and another question: were those pictures edited(brightness/ contrast/ colour combinations etc )? or just the original ones?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

Check description

@emergecreative_ Жыл бұрын

Im confused/ when you mention noise feedback from the image stabilization you showed a sigma lens? Wondering if the noise is actually from sigma or if you used wrong footage. Haha just hoping I can purchase the canon lens and not have that issue

@kmshairstay 6 жыл бұрын

Where did you go to get the video/photo of the colorful beetles and birds?

@christopherfrost 6 жыл бұрын

Some zoo I went to - I can't remember where, sorry!

@FilipHuzjak 7 жыл бұрын

My favourite lens.

@neiltudor8625 9 жыл бұрын

hi Christopher I purchased the ef 70-200mm is usm lens today, to use on my 6d, your right the noise is quite loud in is mode.is it normal, and does the outside mike make a lot of difference on the play back video. can you still hear the motor noise. thank you

@christopherfrost 9 жыл бұрын

An outside mic will still pick up some noise I'm afraid, unless it's far away from the caemera

@Polum2 22 күн бұрын

As is the Canon 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 USM. For those of us on even tighter budgets. another deeply underrated lens, will you do a review on this one Chris?

@OneHappyShooter 10 жыл бұрын

Would its weather sealing make it a better choice over the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 OS HSM? Thank you. I think you're doing a great job, BTW. Keep it up.

@christopherfrost 10 жыл бұрын

It's a string to the Canon lens's bow. The main difference is that the Canon lens is noticably sharper (although of course, the Sigma lens lets in twice as much light)