Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II: Final Review

No video

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II: Final Review | 4K

Рет қаралды 62,140

Күн бұрын

Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS II: Final Review | Build Quality and Upgrades 1:25 | Autofocus Performance 4:35 | 1.4x Extender Observations and Images 5:57 | Sigma MC-11 and Sony Observations 6:55 | Image Quality 8:10 | Dustin's Wrap-Up 14:20 |
Read the Full Written Review: bit.ly/70200F4L...
Check out the Image Gallery bit.ly/70200IIig
Buy the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2JkD4Gt | Amazon: amzn.to/2NQkSb9 | Amazon Canada: amzn.to/2uA6Hhr | Amazon UK: amzn.to/2mj8bZM | Amazon Germany: amzn.to/2Laipd6 | Ebay: bit.ly/70200Lii
Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at:
B&H Photo: bhpho.to/1TA0Xge
Amazon: www.amazon.com...
Ebay: bit.ly/DustineBay
Make a donation via Paypal: paypal.me/dustinTWI
Get a discount off all Skylum Editing Software (Luminar, Aurora HDR, AirMagic) by using code DUSTINHDR at checkout: bit.ly/LuminarDLA
Become a Patron: / dustinabbott | Check me out on: Personal Website: dustinabbott.net/ | Sign up for my Newsletter: bit.ly/1RHvUNp | Instagram: bit.ly/DLAinsta | Google+: bit.ly/24PjMzv | Facebook: on. 1nuUUeH | Twitter: bit.ly/1RyYxIH | Flickr: bit.ly/1UcnC0B | 500px: bit.ly/1Sy2Ngu
My filming setup: Sony a7R III: B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2D6ibNO or Amazon: amzn.to/2CNxOvH | or | Sony a9 @ B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2HyWIyt or Amazon: amzn.to/2s1vYE0
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 RXD @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2FA00la or Amazon amzn.to/2G2kaEr
Lights: Rotolight AEOS @B&H Photo bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Genaray Contender @B&H Photo: bhpho.to/33HbGNM | and Aputure AL-MW: bhpho.to/2N3MtZV
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Keywords: Canon 70-200 f4 ii, 70-200, f/4L, IS II, USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II, Canon 70-200 Review, Canon 70-200 f4 is ii, Canon, f4 is, f4 IS ii, Canon 70-200 f4 is ii review, Dustin Abbott, Photography, Sample Images, Video Test, Real World, Tamron 70-210 VC, Tamron 70-210, Comparison, Test, AF

Пікірлер: 167

@Genesis.1-1 4 жыл бұрын

Always the best equipment review videos. Appreciate your work.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

You're welcome.

@GiuseppePipia 6 жыл бұрын

Great review series on the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS II, Dustin! Thank you!

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

My pleasure.

@MrJAM-np7go 6 жыл бұрын

Roger Cicala in Lensrental tested 70-200 F4L IS II with their 10 samples. As for the result, the 70-200 F4L IS II is THE BEST 70-200 F4 lens for now. I was skeptical with the approach of Canon, they are updating perfectly fine lenses, but I'm kind of understand Canon now. Updating lens seems like somewhat conservative advance tactics. I hoped more of niche products or aggresive products, but I can't judge their decision.

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

I do think they have a method, but lets just say it would only work for the market leader. Smaller companies have to be more aggressive.

@khuo0219 4 жыл бұрын

After watching this review a year ago, I got it after the used market finally took shape. Bought from Map Camera from Japan on Ebay and incredibly happy. Having owned and sold the 2.8 IS, i almost thought the seller forgot to pack a lens in there when I held the box which was so light. The five stops of IS allow me to nail focus handheld in a dimly lit room. No whirring sound when the IS motor was working. It was deceptively quiet, I turned it off and took another shot and the image was very blurry. My back and arm will thank me later.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

It's a great lens, for sure.

@khuo0219 4 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI Did not know that you have affiliate links for Ebay as well. Will definitely click next time I got GAS :)

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

@@khuo0219 Thanks!

@TomalBhattacharjee 3 ай бұрын

Since you have used a 2.8 and this lens. How much of a difference is there in AF speed, accuracy and Image quality of f4 compared to the f2.8. ? Budget wise f4 suits me. We don’t have option for buying or testing a used one. Have to buy a brand new one. N I plan to use it on my 5Dmk4.

@WolfQuantum 3 жыл бұрын

I realize this is a few years old. If you still read these I have a question. I did pick up the Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 DI VC USD G2 recently. The Tap-In console was tossed in for free by one of the big NYC bases stores. Partially due to your review. And the fact I couldn't really afford the Canon L 2.8. Great lens though. Next up for me is a 70-200mm. The Canon f4 IS L is $1299 US and the Tamron SP 70-200/2.8 DI VC USD G2 is priced at $1199 with the 6 year USA warranty. Is there any real reason I shouldn't just go with the Tamron and get 2.8 maximum aperture and be able to use the Tap-In on it as well? I do most images outside, but I don't climb mountains, live in a rain forest, or deal routinely with sandstorms. Well, not the latter since I PCS's from my military posting in the Sinai, Egypt back in 1988. I just deal with Southwest Texas heat. I was willing to go with F4 for some cost savings over the 2.8 Canon. However, I still want the IS and that puts me right back at the Tamron 2.8 IS or Canon f4 IS. If you stumble across this comment here in 2021 and don't mind answering it is much appreciated. Appreciate the videos too.

@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын

I would personally go with Tamron G2. I owned that lens until I switched completely over to mirrorless, and it served me well. You're already familiar with the Tap In, so I think you'll find it a nice compliment to your 24-70

@LinhTran-gf5yv 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks, I'm getting this after watching ur review

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

It's an excellent lens.

@Pmeyer1226 2 жыл бұрын

I’m curious to know if anyone has used this lens with the 1.4 TC on a R series camera, and if results/issues are worth the effort.

@DustinAbbottTWI 2 жыл бұрын

I haven’t personally tested that combo

@rhykko77 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dustin ! Some of the best reviews and tests on KZfaq

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

Glad you like them!

@GrummanIsComin 5 жыл бұрын

At 7:49 you were photobombed! LOL 😂. Cute cat. Seriously, great review!!!

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, he's pretty good about that.

@NickRno77 2 ай бұрын

I was looking at the RF version, I’ve changed my mind, I probably get a good used EF version especially as I can use a 1.4x .Many Thanks

@DustinAbbottTWI 2 ай бұрын

I did buy the RF version, but the inability to use TC's is definitely a negative.

@damonhanson3522 4 жыл бұрын

Well, at first I was using the 70-300 f/4-5.6 L IS, and then went to the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, but now I have ordered this lens. I hand-carry for long periods of time and should benefit from the weight reduction. I've learned that I can still get some very buttery bokeh at f/4. Will I be happy with the 1.4 III extender? Much controversy on the extenders.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

It worked fine with the 1.4x in my tests.

@damonhanson3522 4 жыл бұрын

Dustin Abbott Awesome. Thanks Dustin! Have been enjoying your reviews immensely.

@jeanmariewild1870 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing such great review about this Canon 70-200mm F4 L II lens. This has been one of my dream lenses but I hadn’t really got a chance to know more about it from a user or finding a review to help me decide especially head to head with other lenses. Now, what is your thought about a combination of this lens with Canon EOS RP with an extender (1.4 or 2X)? Thanks for the help Mr. Dustin! Keep up the spirit 🙏🏾🙏🏾

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I haven't tested the RP yet, but I suspect it should work fine with either extender.

@evgeny832 6 жыл бұрын

Great video as usual which inspired and fulfilled by real professional photographer! Thanks a lot Mr. Abbott!

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

My pleasure.

@qwaseosamadade5519 6 жыл бұрын

thanks for just an honest review and opinion on the lens, i think is the best review out there for anybody who wants to purchase this lens ;)

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

That's my hope!

@PromoMoviescomau Жыл бұрын

Thanks Dustin, you are a true professional.

@DustinAbbottTWI Жыл бұрын

I appreciate that!

@ductritran8637 4 жыл бұрын

I hate lens noise this one is definitely better than the first version and worth to change . I’m buying this lens .

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

It's a great lens for the money.

@kenmack9571 4 жыл бұрын

Amazing that in Late 2019 you can obtain this lens for almost half the listed price from some overseas suppliers with free delivery so it becomes a no brainier for a brilliant piece of Canon engineering .

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

The whole "Grey Market" situation is a strange one for North American retailers. Your biggest liability in purchasing grey market comes from warranty service. Here's hoping you don't need it!

@justinholding02 6 жыл бұрын

Nice review Dustin, thanks. Canon have just showed the mirrorless kids that they are still the boss when it comes to lenses :-)

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

Lenses are something the Canon typically does very well, despite a couple of recent ones that have left me a little underwhelmed (the 24-105L II is a prime example).

@Filipengra 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dustinn. wainting for the next video of the sigma 105 1.4.

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

It's edited and will be released to the public perhaps at the end of the week.

@buyaport 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks again for putting all this effort into your videos, which are (as you would say) "consistently" great over quite some years. Finally subscribed, and recommend all viewers to do the same.

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the sub!

@funstuff2review947 5 жыл бұрын

Great in depth review as always Dustin. Did you try the lens and extender on the Canon 80D. I shoot an 80D and was contemplating getting this setup for bird photography. With the 1.4 extender and 1.6 crop factor of the 80D that would give me the equivalent of a 156 - 448mm f5.6 lens. That seems like a great wild life lens.

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I don't think I used the extender on the 80D, but it will work fine as the maximum aperture is only 5.6. I primarily focused on full frame for the review as this is a full frame lens.

@puluqemil 4 жыл бұрын

THANKS， very helpful. i plan to buy this lens.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

Enjoy

@arunrokade 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the detailed review Dustin. Image quality and bokeh wise how does it compare to Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS. Canon has discontinued EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS, so will have to get hold of an used one.

@DustinAbbottTWI 2 жыл бұрын

I do love the 70-300L. I'd probably go that route.

@abdulrashidtahir 4 жыл бұрын

I bought this lens a few days ago. Better than the 2.8 in term of price(need to wait another year to get one) and weight (2.8 is too heavy for me as I am getting older).

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

Enjoy your new lens.

@Hubieee Жыл бұрын

Wonder, this lens over the RF f/4? Weight is very close, internal zoom is preferable for me. Well okay, packaging size is bigger.... but you can get it for 600€ less ...

@DustinAbbottTWI Жыл бұрын

That depends on your tolerance for using adapters.

@HS-fk6hb 6 жыл бұрын

Great video! Thanks!

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

You're welcome.

@KaReEdCa 4 жыл бұрын

Hey Dustin, another great video. I respect your opinion and thorough review process. I've got a quick question... I have an EOS RP and do mostly landscape but do love portraits of my kids. I've been set on f2. 8 but truth is that's too expensive (and even heavy) for what I want. I've seen quite a few f4 is versions selling @500 or under and really want to understand if jumping to mkii is really that much better over the mki

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

The MKII is definitely a better lens, but the first gen lens was also excellent. You will hear some noise from the IS system, but it is optically strong.

@eliaspap8708 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dustin, another great review! If you can manage to get a good copy then im sure it was designed to thrill, I sent mine straight back to canon unfortunately it was woefully blury on left side, after they aligned the optics it was a lot better but I was never that impressed, my APSc equivalent Fuji 50-140mm f2.8 was sharper! and that shouldn’t be the case i would think, luckily i managed to sell it and now move forward to seeing how we go with R Series optics, looking forward to your review on the Canon R6.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

That's very, very surprising.

@John_N_from_NC 5 жыл бұрын

Great Commentary Dustin! I bought the 70-200 f/4 IS right before the II came out. Is the II that much better than the original IS? Is the II worth the hassle of selling my lens for the II? I'm thinking not as the Lens I have is super sharp when I do my part...............

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

If you're happy with what you have, then stick with it.

@zotyar6829 5 жыл бұрын

Dear Dustin, get review as always! But at this time i would like to ask your advise regard purchasing a telephoto zoom lens. Actually i own the following lenses on a Canon 80D crop-sensor body: - Samyang 8mm f/3,5 UMC CSII - Canon EF-S10-18mm f/4,5-5,6 - Sigma 18-35mm f/1,8 DC HSM - Canon EF 50mm f/1,8 - Canon EF-S 60mm f/2,8 Macro it is time to complete my set until the 200mm, so i have a few variations for that, and in this question i will ask your advise. First option: Sigma 50-100mm f/1,8 DC HSM, + Canon 100-400mm f/4,5-5,6L II IS USM. Second option: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2,8 IS III USM + Canon Extender 1,4x III. Maybe you will have even a third variation too, but please try to help me in decision following: best lenses and photo quality on APS-C. Thank you again, and waiting your thought. Regards, Zoltan.

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I would start with the 70-200 and extender. There's a lot of versatility there and it's a good lens to have for many situations.

@zotyar6829 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you, otherwise i had think the Sigma would be better, but even the 70-200 f/2,8 is a nice piece of kit.

@JimBailey 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you Mr Abbott

@carlobricco8907 5 жыл бұрын

Hi Dustin, great review, in the video you mentioned you used it with sony, i have sony a7iii and mc-11 how does the tamron 70-200 2.8 work with if you used it?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Only okay. The Sigma 70-200 Sport is the better choice if Sony is your primary concern.

@NilBangla 3 жыл бұрын

So Nice Videos ❤️

@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks 🤗

@Lesterandsons 6 жыл бұрын

Deep review as always

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

@Lesterandsons 6 жыл бұрын

Dustin Abbott you deserve it

@THEJEDEYEMASTER 6 жыл бұрын

for the $1300 price get the tamron 70-200 g2 vc which is 2.8 abd also brighter VF and more backround blur and tripod collar. you need to pay extra for that with the canon 70-200 f4

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

For many I believe this is true, but you’ll find there are plenty who just aren’t interested in a bigger f/2.8 lens even if it is the same price.

@vinaychinapanjwani2060 3 жыл бұрын

Tamron G2 works exelent on 80D but on 90D picture is much softer so i m disappointed, 90D need canon glasses

@georgeapex6746 6 жыл бұрын

Dustin thank you once more for the detailed review, have you managed to get into your hands the new - haha - 70-200 2.8 mark iii. I am looking to buy a 70-200 and i would like to know if the focusing during video has been somehow bettered in comparison with the mark ii . Thank you in advance keep up the great work

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

I'm still waiting for its arrival, but frankly the AF was already fantastic in the older version.

@86BBUB 3 жыл бұрын

Can the extender be used with a Sony body? (A7R4 or A9 With MC-11)

@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын

I think so, though I haven't specifically tested that combination.

@seandaley6835 3 жыл бұрын

Is this good for indoor sports photography?

@DustinAbbottTWI 3 жыл бұрын

Not as good as an F2.8 zoom for light gathering, obviously, but if the venue is well lit, there is plenty of focus speed and image quality.

@msbrownbeast 4 жыл бұрын

What is the purpose of having a larger front glass element with the new version? I have tested some of my lenses and it seems that the sensor does not utilize the entire surface area of the front glass element (at the fringe)

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

It is most likely about two things: optimizing the amount of light entering the front element and also to accommodate a more robust optical formula that delivers better results.

@thewak000 4 жыл бұрын

Hi Dustin, how wuold you rate this lens against the previous mark I version? Also, would you recommend the newer Tamron 70-210 f4 for price to performance? Thank you

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

There are a number of strongly improved areas, including focus and image stabilizer improvements. There are some image quality improvements as well, but all three lenses you mention are actually quite good.

@user-ro7ks1us5b 5 ай бұрын

It's parfocal lens or not?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 ай бұрын

I don't actually know that.

@sandraeisphotography 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much again for a very thorough review! I've always appreciated you sharing your wisdom and feedback and you've become my "go-to" source for reviews and information online since I unknowingly showed up at your door one day to purchase a Manfrotto tripod from you and you selflessly shared a great deal of valuable learning information with me as a new photographer :)

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Wow - I had nearly forgotten about that. Pretty cool!

@sandraeisphotography 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI you're basically a huge local celebrity to me 😆. I get star- struck when I see you in the grocery store hahahaha

@sandraeisphotography 5 жыл бұрын

P.S. I just ordered the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 g2 to add to my collection after watching many of your reviews on this lens and it's competitors over the past year. Thanks again for your professionalism and taking the time to share your wisdom 😊

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

That's a great lens. I own one, too, and it gets a lot of use for weddings and events.

@eastongordon9046 3 жыл бұрын

I guess im randomly asking but does someone know a method to log back into an instagram account..? I was stupid forgot the password. I would appreciate any tricks you can offer me.

@patrickparisienne1917 5 жыл бұрын

Hi Dustin, Great reviews! Would this lens be suitable for indoor shots, without speed lights, say in a church for weddings?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I prefer wide apertures, myself, but it can be done. You may have to push ISO up higher to get fast enough shutter speeds to stop action. If your priority is shooting indoors, though, I would go for the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 G2 for about the same price.

@unknownKnownunknowns 2 жыл бұрын

Very Helpful thank you. After a few years, how would you compare this f/4 iii to the 2.8 iii in terms of autofocus speed and image quality? Thanks!

@DustinAbbottTWI 2 жыл бұрын

There's isn't a big difference between the two

@unknownKnownunknowns 2 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you

@ramijalal3953 5 жыл бұрын

I have a good question for you , incase you want take a wedding picture for many people in there what is the best lens for Canon Eos M50?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

The 10-22mm is a pretty strong option for shooting crowds

@timcisneros8850 5 жыл бұрын

Great video Dustin! I am considering buying this lens or the Tamron 70-200 g2 2.8 . If size isn’t a huge issue for me which do you think would be better for sports photography?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

The F2.8 lens...particularly if you are shooting indoors. That extra stop of light makes a huge difference.

@marcsworld1love 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI hi and I shoot out door sports mainly surfing. Early morning is dark sometimes and after sunset. Would 2.8 benefit for that and all through the day?

@bipolarunboxesstuff8745 6 жыл бұрын

Another great video!

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@tracylee.g. Жыл бұрын

Can I use the sigma 1.4 tc1401 extender with this lens? Very happy with the lens but my sigma 150-600mm came with an extender!

@DustinAbbottTWI Жыл бұрын

I haven't tested that combination. Sometimes there are a few quirks using a third party TC with a Canon lens, but it is worth a try.

@tracylee.g. Жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you. Response much appreciated.

@betspath 4 жыл бұрын

I need a lens for my Canon 6D that will take great pictures of the birds on the lake we live in. I’m on a deck overlooking the lake. Telephoto lens. Please recommend one?

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

The best pick would a lens like the Canon 100-400L II. A cheaper option would be the Tamron 100-400 VC or 150-600mm G2.

@betspath 4 жыл бұрын

Dustin Abbott I’m going to get the Tameron 100-400. Thank you.

@David_from86 4 жыл бұрын

Hey Dustin, Loving your reviews! I currently own a 77d and use a cheap and cheerful 55/250 stm lens. I’m currently looking to upgrade my zoom. I mainly shoot motorsports, do a lot of panning and family shots such as portraits whilst out and about. I’m currently looking at this as it is £700 cheaper than the f2.8. I’m also looking at the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 at around £1200 and the Canon 70-300 USM consumer grade lens that you did a great review on. Obviously much cheaper. I’m wondering if I’ll benefit from having different image stabilisation modes ie just vertical for panning which the cheaper 70/300 doesn’t have. Do the different image stabilisation modes make a big difference instead of simply on or off? Thanks!

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

While the different stabilization modes do make a minor difference, most lenses without an option to control the IS system have the ability to sense when panning is taking place and making a minor adjustment. I wouldn't base my buying choice on that.

@David_from86 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. Your advice is valued! 👍🏼

@David_from86 4 жыл бұрын

Dustin Abbott Hi Dustin, I’m sorry if I feel like a thorn in your side asking so many questions recently. I noted that you said this lens worked well with the 1.4x extender in your review. When using an extender is the focus limiter witch affected? I like the idea of being able to extend my focal length for a couple of race tracks in the U.K. but sometimes find myself behind a wire fence. Thank you again.

@DustinAbbottTWI 4 жыл бұрын

@@David_from86 I'm presuming the focus limiter will function as normal. The focal length is longer, but the focus distances remain the same.

@sloan.d 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks Dustin for your in-depth review. Considering purchasing this lens for use with the Canon EOS RP. Certainly agree with you about the light weight and compact benefits of the lens. Took a few test shots which were very sharp. Also appreciate your guidance on the 1.4x extender. Any advice on purchasing Canon's T.Mount Ring AII (WII)?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Do you feel like you need the tripod ring?

@yvetterobichaud1919 5 жыл бұрын

As you build out the length of this lens with hood and then add x-tender, the collar gives huge stability to a long lens. May depend on body you use but overall it is a benefit to have the collar, I would say. Use it or don't. At least you have it in the bag.

@lmallard3788 5 жыл бұрын

At what shutter speed, handheld, should is be turned off?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Frankly I rarely turn it off with the newer lenses. They don't really give a sharpness hit like older systems did. In theory, however, anything over 1/500th with a lens like this would apply.

@alexandrelongaray3987 5 жыл бұрын

Hi Dustin. In your opinion, is it worth to upgrade from previous version to this Mark II? Besides that boiling water sound from IS, is there a substancial improvement in image quality? Thanks a lot

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

hi Alexandre - it is a solid upgrade in a number of areas (AF, IS, and IQ). That being said, none of those are revolutionary improvements. It really comes down to how much it would cost to upgrade and if you consider that to be worth it.

@alexandrelongaray3987 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI I see. Probably 'll buy it and sell my Mk 1. I've spent so many time researching about that new f/2.8 Mk 3, and I'm prepared to pay for it. But I always hear people complaining about weight. Some reviewers did the reverse path, going from f/2.8 to f/4. Nowadays, I have 3 bodies: 6D1, 80D and 5D4. And 4 L lens: 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-105 f/4L IS, 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS and that 70-200 f/4L IS Mk1. Any suggestion?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

The biggest question to ask yourself is what you would want to do with the lens at F2.8 that you can't do at F4. If there isn't much there, then buy the F4 II. Buy for your needs.

@alexandrelongaray3987 5 жыл бұрын

Dustin Abbott Thanks again for your kind attention. As a portrait lover, bokeh and IQ are my priorities.

@d_v5401 5 жыл бұрын

Dear Dustin, i use a canon eos 80d handheld for family photography and sometimes landscape photography, i am considering 70-200 f4, should i get this one or the first non IS considering its half the price of IS ii, thank you.

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I will say that handholding 200mm on a crop camera like the 80D is tough. If you are considering the non-IS version, you might go for the 70-300mm IS II instead.

@vinaychinapanjwani2060 3 жыл бұрын

For 80D TAMRON 70-200 G2 exelent resuly

@brentdrafts2290 6 жыл бұрын

Like your reviews. I mostly shoot film, as my hobby interest.

@brentdrafts2290 6 жыл бұрын

I have a 6d for digital. Is the chromatic aberration mostly a digital artifact?

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

The chromatic aberration is minimal and isn't enough to be a factor for film or digital.

@DECKARD263354BR 5 жыл бұрын

Hi Dustin, I'm seriously considering this lense and was wondering if you have any proposed reviews of 3rd party 1.4x extenders such as the new Kenko Teleplus HD DGX which is less than half the price of the Canon. Thankyou!!

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I've used Kenko extenders in the past and had a fairly positive experience with them. My one objection was that they would become "bricked" when new cameras were introduced (no longer compatible). Have they added the ability to do firmware updates? If not, they aren't worth the money because you'll have to replace them. If so, then they might be worth it.

@DECKARD263354BR 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI I'm not sure about firmware updates but the Canon 1.4x would be dependable and consistent, thanks again !!

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

It will be, though, to be fair, Canon is on the MK III of their adapters, and their support of the older TCs drops off.

@billperry6101 5 жыл бұрын

hi Dustin i have Canon70-300 is usm mkii lens and thinking of exchanging it for 70-200f/4 L is usm lens i mainly shoot wildlife, mainly birds, i would really like your thoughts on this exchange yours thankfully Bill Perry

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

Both are competent lenses, though I would consider the 70-200 to be more of a pro-grade lens on a lot of levels.

@billperry6101 5 жыл бұрын

thanks for the comment, not putting you on a spot but would you recommend me doing the exchange , your thankfully Bill Perry

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

So long as you don't think you will miss the extra reach. 200mm is not 300mm.

@LeoKleemann 6 жыл бұрын

Dustin, if you had to choose 3 lenses for your entire life and you can use only that lenses. witch lenses would you choose?

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

That’s a very tough decision, and one I’m glad I don’t have to make. Probably the 35L II, a good macro lens (100L IS), and a 70-200 f/2.8

@LeoKleemann 6 жыл бұрын

Hummm nice decision. I'm thinking to buy two new lenses. I've the Canon 24-70 2.8 I think i'll get the - 16-35 III 2.8 - 24-70 II 2.8 - 70-200 III IS 2.8 - and consider a macro in the future...

@NoiTuiEarn 6 жыл бұрын

I will choose 24-105 F4L IS II + 70-200 F2.8 L III + 85mm F1.4L IS

@thelookoflifefilms 5 жыл бұрын

@@DustinAbbottTWI If you had a 7DMKII what would be your choices?

@henson2k 5 жыл бұрын

Is it still made in Japan?

@DustinAbbottTWI 5 жыл бұрын

I don't have the lens on hand, and I don't actually remember that. Canon has been getting a little "sneaky" about where they share that information. It is often pressed into the bayonet mount in very small letters.

@zackchoy1969 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the great review!~

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

You’re welcome

@chickensoupchickensoup6417 6 жыл бұрын

@07:45 A Cat visitor!

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

Yes, he was roaming around while I did the review.

@SantanKGhey1234 6 жыл бұрын

First! Thank you Dustin!

@morvegil 6 жыл бұрын

I heard the motor is quieter

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

It definitely is.

@thefilmpoets 6 жыл бұрын

big plus for video. The f/4 IS sounds like an engine - loudest I've owned.

@howardkahn717 6 жыл бұрын

i thought the extra glass was to protect the actual lens from being damaged......

@DustinAbbottTWI 6 жыл бұрын

If you regularly employ the lens hood, there are few occasions when that would be the case.

@howardkahn4330 6 жыл бұрын

I do keep the lens hood on because it helps with the sunlight issues, I use them both for better damage control....I do not have insurance and my lenses are very expensive, SO !

@DanielFazzari 6 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hpZzf7OFyZymlKc.html