Canon R7 vs Fujifilm X-T5 Camera Comparison, Which Is Better?
Рет қаралды 28,933
Күн бұрынHands on review comparing the Canon R7 vs Fujifilm X-T5 Camera Comparison. Which of these two APS-C cameras is better? We compare the image quality, video quality, ergonomics, autofocus in stills and video, image stabilization, ISO and dynamic range. Take a look and let us know which camera you would choose.
#cameracomparison #CanonR7 #FujifilmX-T5
Enter the GIVEAWAY for a chance to win an SKB Case: theslantedlens.com/giveaway/
SKB iSeries 2217-8 Case with Padded Dividers and Lid Organizer:
www.skbcases.com/products/i-s...
Datacolor Spyder Checkr: www.datacolor.com/
B&H - bhpho.to/3znDuIp
Amazon - amzn.to/3K3V9K2
Canon R7:
B&H - bhpho.to/3nCEi9V
Amazon - amzn.to/3nvqca5
Fujifilm X-T5:
B&H - bhpho.to/3G7PDVA
Amazon - amzn.to/3TYcb0K
Timestamps:
00:00 Canon R7 vs Fujifilm X-T5 Camera Comparison
00:44 Sensors & Crop Factor
01:03 Resolution
01:24 Price
01:34 Image Quality Test
02:59 Ergonomics
05:53 Monitor
06:37 Viewfinder
07:04 Autofocus Stills
07:45 Autofocus Stills Test
09:09 Continuous Shooting
10:21 Video Autofocus Test
11:20 Internal Recording Modes
11:58 Video Quality Test
15:46 Video Image Stabilization Test
16:41 ISO Test
19:38 Dynamic Range Test
23:50 Conclusion
SHOW US SOME LOVE! SUBSCRIBE!
Subscribe to The Slanted Lens and get new videos every Tuesday:
bit.ly/1RgdYoM
Support The Slanted Lens by shopping our affiliate links:
B&H: Weekly Photography Deals & More: bhpho.to/2AxlpH2
Amazon: amzn.to/1T7Z20D
Follow The Slanted Lens-
Facebook: / theslantedlens
Twitter: / theslantedlens
Instagram: / theslantedlens
Visit the webpage: theslantedlens.com
Visit our SPONSORS
Tamron Lenses: bit.ly/2mZgkoz
SKB: www.skbcases.com/
Westcott: www.fjwestcott.com/?sca_ref=2...
Datacolor: www.datacolor.com/
Triple Scoop Music: www.triplescoopmusic.com
TSL Store: theslantedlens.com/tsl-store/
---
GEAR USED:
Canon C200
B&H: bhpho.to/2FJaH8d
Amazon: amzn.to/34aYAbJ
Canon 24-70 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2OCKjgl
Amazon: amzn.to/2O871PH
Sony A7 RIII
B&H: bhpho.to/2DZYHut
Amazon: amzn.to/2QFH0Zu
Canon EOS R
B&H: bhpho.to/2roExVE
Amazon: amzn.to/2QEnk8s
Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 G2
B&H: bhpho.to/2J2wp4j
Amazon: amzn.to/2KCVw0v
Tamron 28-75 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2FsWNno
Amazon: amzn.to/2KJ3rcD
Tamron 17-28 2.8
B&H: bhpho.to/2ItePur
Amazon: amzn.to/37qnWVh
Spyder Color Checkr
B&H: bhpho.to/2JgfPCz
Amazon: amzn.to/3eofTeb
Sennheiser G4 Wireless Lav
B&H: bhpho.to/2BrOeei
Amazon: amzn.to/2Mreesc
Discounts:
15% off Lens Pro To Go
www.lensprotogo.com
Use Discount Code: SLANTEDLENS15
$10 off Luminar by Skylum
macphun.evyy.net/c/2073517/64...
Use Discount Code: LuminarTSL10
__
The Slanted Lens is a photography and video KZfaq channel where we feature photography and lighting tutorials, camera reviews, photo and video related product reviews and industry business tips. Our founder, Jay P. Morgan, has been working as a Commercial Photographer and Film Director/DP in the Los Angeles area for more than 30 years developing an impressive list of clients from Paramount to McDonald's. Jay P.'s experience with elaborate set design and extensive lighting are key to the success of his illustrative work. Jay P has also taught college level photography and video courses for many years. He is happy to share his knowledge with you. Join us by subscribing and asking questions that we are happy to answer!
@VisualizeHealing 10 ай бұрын
Great video, thanks! I have a question though. If you wanted one for birding and wildlife, would you go for the Canon with the RF 100-500 or the Fuji with the 150-600? Thanks!
@JDubyafoto Жыл бұрын
Very good comparison. I was glad when you commented on the XT-5 not being equal to the HS-2 for video. It brings home a point you didn't mention and that's what purpose and where in a brand's lineup each camera is intended to fill. The XT-5 wasn't designed to be a vlogging or really even a video camera, although it has a decent ability to handle the job. It's basically a still photographer's tool.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Totally agree. Thanks for your comment.
@joshmartonosi5624 9 ай бұрын
I would like to see how the Sony A6700 competes with these two cameras. Any chance you’ll be making a comparison with that camera as well?
@MorningNapalm Жыл бұрын
The dynamic range score I didn't agree with at all. The Fuji was visibly ahead when over-exposing, the Canon while under-exposing. Not sure why the Canon completely losing the car outside at +2 and +3 went uncommented, considering how much time was spent criticising the Fuji when underexposing. I would call that one a tie.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your opinion!
@pingu9046 Жыл бұрын
So true, Fuji files were usable still while the Canon ones were totally blown out. plus you can tell how much noise the Canon had all the time around the hair and dark areas trying to restore some shadows.. So much more work to do to fix the Canon files compared to the Fuji ones
@yopiwahyudi3 10 ай бұрын
I agree with you, the canon files really explode and I can't use them
@Eyeofkamau 9 ай бұрын
Yeah that was absolutely mind blowing. Not sure how they could come to the conclusion of Fuji not keeping up when the fuji 40mp sensor clearly obliterated the even the R6 in their DR test with the a7iv involved too. So the lesser R7 somehow performed better than the R6 and beat Fuji? Lol
@retouthugues4921 11 күн бұрын
I agree with you, the fuji looks like if it hade better dynamic range. Canon sensors are known to have difficulties to deal with highlights, and we can see it in this test. that's why it's better to under expose sometime. I have a canon and i know that if i want more details in the highlights i need to underexpose a bit to don't loose details or in the menue i can put "priority highlights". Then i can have very good quality pictures. Fujifilm colours are better too, i love them, i think my next camera will be a fujifilm for those beautiful colours !!!
@steven871 Жыл бұрын
I love the manual dials of Fuji. Sad i had to sell my x-pro2. Amazing travel cam.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yeah, those dials are nice. Glad you enjoyed your Fuji!
@MorningNapalm Жыл бұрын
I always have trouble finding things in the menus on Canons and especially Sonys, whereas with Fuji and Nikon I find things quite quickly.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Good to hear. Thanks for sharing your experience!
@nicklennaerts4791 Жыл бұрын
Great video as usual! There was a mistake at 5:57 however regarding the quality of monitors. The X-T5 has 1.84 million dot display.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks for pointing that out. That's what we get for relying on the specs on B&H. Next time we will have to triple check.
@user-mq8rw8eg2w 9 ай бұрын
Great comparison!
@TheSlantedLens 9 ай бұрын
Glad you think so! Thanks for your comment!
@ADPproductionsGR 8 ай бұрын
This was very informative, congratulations for making such videos!
@TheSlantedLens 8 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for your comment!
@tiemji Ай бұрын
Than sk for this detailed review!!
@TheSlantedLens Ай бұрын
You are very welcome. Thanks for watching!
@eliaspap8708 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing but I’m not really seeing what your seeing with dynamic range, go back and have a look at the bottom of the window frame at +2, the Fuji has heaps more detail were the Canon is blown out, the skin tones on the Fuji hold up a lot better to me.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, the Fujifilm tended to be darker in all the tests, so it makes sense that it would hold out better in the overexposing. Thanks for your comment!
@lucascooley912 Жыл бұрын
I was surprised to see Canon get the win for the dynamic range test. The skin tones were far less useable on the Canon in the overexposed images. Youd have to do a lot more in post to try and get a useable image. And in the underexposed images it was extremely close.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your opinion and thanks for watching!
@wyrdedwurd 11 ай бұрын
Not to mention that uncontrolled, outdoor light was being used in the background for the comparison. What guarantee do we have that the lighting didn't change between shots? Very unscientific and makes it hard not to dismiss this part of the comparison out of hand. Also, how well the raw files recover lost highlights in post would have been good to know. I know Fuji's dynamic range settings allow the sensor to adjust iso & exposure for parts of the scene that are over-exposed but there's no mention of what settings were used here.
@SlicedBread1001 Жыл бұрын
At 18:19 the picture says Canon 3200 ISO and Fuji 6400 ISO. It might explain some of the inconsistencies of the ISO test.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
That was actually and error on the white board. They are both 3200 ISO. We should have put up a type correction. Thanks for checking on that.
@cy9nvs Жыл бұрын
Great comparison, as always, but the Dynamic range test kind of bothers me. According to “Photons to Photos” the X-T5 should have slightly better dynamic range at very low ISO (roughly 100-200) and they're pretty much identical the rest of the ISO range. I'm 99% sure all the highlights on the car could've been completely recovered in post.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
We tried. They were just too blown out. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
@cy9nvs Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens is the image you're showing an edited raw file or is that how it shows up straight after importing? It's hard to imagine that pulling the highlights down isn't bringing up more detail in this situation.
@eliaspap8708 Жыл бұрын
Agree the car is deceiving why didn’t he look at the bottom of the window frame at +2? It’s clear as day the Fuji had plenty detail were the Canon was completely blown out! Weird
@SlicedBread1001 Жыл бұрын
It’s interesting as digital camera worlds lab tests has the dynamic range trailing the x-t4.
@pakorn7000 Жыл бұрын
I love the manual dials, and upgraded from the X-T4 to the X-T5 one thing because of the screen. With the X-T4, it usually got in the way when I go very low or very high. Photography is my main love, and the X-T5 intends to serve that way. I love Fujifilm as a good system, not as a single camera. The lenses are mostly compact and with good quality - great price/performance. Most of the time it gives me good enough AF performance for my works (We don't always need Ferrari's fast, do we?)
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Good point. No, we don't always need the most expensive.
@parmanduke Жыл бұрын
X T5 for the colors, image quality, & picture profiles. Add better user experience too
@mbismbismb Жыл бұрын
Better user experience? Hahahaha
@spinkscapes775 Жыл бұрын
@@mbismbismb I just upgraded my XT3 to an R7. I've had enough of the Fuji "user experience".
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your preference!
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Glad you like your R7!
@Photoshop240117 6 ай бұрын
@@spinkscapes775 : I did the same after using the X-T5. Fuji is only marketing.
@ralphlouzon Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this test and all your work. My input is just about the famous articulated screen, and many reviewers go the same way: "an articulated screen is always a plus". Apart for vlogging stuff, how and why is it better? Even for video a tilt screen (in this case vertically and horizontally) is perfect, and obviously far better for photo works for reasons many time discussed. Among photographers AND videographers how many are vloggers? 1-2% ? The influence of KZfaq reviewers (who are vloggers...) is such that they have change the customers expectations on this particular matter, and it is really sad.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
It is better when you want to shoot unique camera angles like inside a box, oven or frig, or in the corner of a room. It definitely comes in handy for both stills and video!
@jfthome Жыл бұрын
As someone who shoots a lot of macro, an articulating screen is a must have. If I had a camera with just a tilting screen it would have to tilt vertically and horizontally.
@eskisaridolmus 6 ай бұрын
Nice comparison. Your Sony a6700 vs Fuji X-S20 comparison was also very good. But you should compare the Fuji X-T5 vs Sony a6700 too.
@TheSlantedLens 6 ай бұрын
We will see what we can do. Thanks for your comment!
@scottswank Жыл бұрын
I struggled between these two. It really came down to the R7's better autofocus vs. the X-T5's better lens selection. There are a few full-frame Canon RF lenses that are a good choice on a APSC body, but just not enough. I went with the Fuji.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Great to hear about your decision making process. Thanks for sharing!
@PhatsoJuggalo806 Жыл бұрын
The R7 is also having an IBIS issue that Canon doesn't seem to want to fix. Fuji is the easy choice for me
@jaymills1720 Жыл бұрын
Selling xt5! AF is the worst
@scottswank Жыл бұрын
@@jaymills1720 You should download the new firmware update. It's a substantial autofocus improvement. I'd still give the Canon R7 the edge, but it's much closer now.
@jaymills1720 Жыл бұрын
@@scottswank yea I did and still I satisfied. Selling xt5!
@AnhNguyen-we1yq Жыл бұрын
what tripod are you using there?
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
That is the Heipi Travel tripod.
@jrc1156 Жыл бұрын
But Fuji's iso is darker than canon's right?
@karlgunterwunsch1950 Жыл бұрын
Yes, that's why the whole comparison is screwed up. Fuji is underexposing by 2/3rd of a stop because their ISO ratings are wrong.
@jrc1156 Жыл бұрын
@@karlgunterwunsch1950 I don't have a fuji camera but im interestedto buy one. However, im curious if the so called iso advantages of the system is legit considering that it is darker compared to canon's from what i have read. Do you have experience with the fujis?
@karlgunterwunsch1950 Жыл бұрын
@@jrc1156 Nope, wouldn't touch the mess that x-trans sensor CFA is. It prevents the use of a AA filter and because of the larger distance of red and blue pixels is more prone to moiree which you can neither remove nor (because of that technological blunder) prevent... x-trans is a total BS technology that should never have happened - and Fuji themselves don't fully believe in it because their best cameras avoid to use that mess and come with a traditional Bayer color filter array.
@alexandervlasov6746 Жыл бұрын
Fuji seems to rate their sensors higher in terms of ISO. So, pictures tend to be underexposed compared to other brands.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Fuji did run a bit darker in all the tests. We find the same thing with Sony cameras.
@yottahertz 5 ай бұрын
I always love the image colors and quality of fuji, there is no match.
@TheSlantedLens 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing you preference!
@mbismbismb Жыл бұрын
I see the xt5 is more contrasty hahaha u can tell from the green shirt she’s wearing… the green on the fuji is so deep
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Contrast is different than color saturation. And the Fuji did tend to be a little darker overall in the tests but not more contrasty.
@mixeddrinks8100 Жыл бұрын
Love my XT5 but... not all the lens work as well on it, some of the older lens just don't go as well, for the zoom lens, only the 16-55 works well, the 16-80 is rather disappointing now. I am sure the R7 can use all the full frame lens.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, if you want to use the Canon EF lenses you will need an adapter.
@michaelwhiles5282 Жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful smile 😎 Have a lovely day both.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thank you and thanks for watching!
@loviehill9333 8 ай бұрын
Your subject for the day is easy on the eyes love her face
@TheSlantedLens 8 ай бұрын
Hope you learned some good things about the cameras!
@giovannicontarelli 11 ай бұрын
In my opinion it is wrong to compare the T5 with the R7. It was better to make the comparison with the H2. The T5 is dedicated to photographers and everything related to video is not to be compared with anything, it was not made for that.
@TheSlantedLens 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing you opinion!
@thomasanderson5929 6 ай бұрын
Crop factor isnt always a negative that needs to seen as detrimental, aka "1.5 is bad enough".... OK, well... for wildlife, a crop factor is a GIGANTIC difference, and even more with a Micro 4/3 camera.... the reach of those cameras is way better without having to spend even more money on longer lenses and then also having to deal with the extra WEIGHT of those lenses. Try doing whale photography with a 100-400mm lens on a crop body vs. a 150-600m lens (that weighs and costs double) on a full frame that also weighs and costs more. You're not going to get as close as you'd want and boats are NOT ALLOWED to get close to some whales like Orcas...you're basically going to need as much reach as you can get. You'd almost have to be stupid to go full frame for wildlife photography.
@TheSlantedLens 6 ай бұрын
Great things to consider. Thanks for sharing your experience with whale photography.
@WeddingStoriesByRakesh Жыл бұрын
You got the videos that matter
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate that!
@MorningNapalm Жыл бұрын
I find it unfair to give the screen point to Canon. On the X-T4 there was a vlogging style screen, but people didn't like it on the photography-oriented X-T line, and so Fuji obliged and put it back. You may like the vlogging style screen, but Fuji's X-T customers don't. The X-H series is their video line, and there they have the vlogging screen.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yeah, it really depends on what works for you!
@yonishperling1531 9 ай бұрын
Very good compensation. I am amazed how Canon colors are relatively worse than the Fuji
@TheSlantedLens 9 ай бұрын
Fuji has really nice color science!
@doug433 9 ай бұрын
Canon has always been my choice. Much better color profile, Fuji seems to intensify greens way too much. Canon wins hands down in my book for wildlife photography. 👍
@TheSlantedLens 9 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your preference. Enjoy your wildlife shoots!
@Chrispitchwildlife Жыл бұрын
So... I guess you did compare the image quality with the exact same lens? Right?
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
We used the Fujifilm 33mm lens and Canon 17-55mm lens.
@yingthao6855 Жыл бұрын
The flippy screen on the canon is really annoying when doing photography but I get it if you’re a videographer. I much prefer the xt5 screen for photography
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yeah, that makes sense for still photography!
@spikeweb5193 Жыл бұрын
Eos r7 WON for me. Image quality 1:1, but video quality r7 - X-t5 1:0
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, so true if you are a hybrid shooter!
@AswinLai Жыл бұрын
The bell is just too loud...hurt my ear when i using headphone
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Awe, sorry about that. Thanks for the feedback!
@gundamzerostrike 10 ай бұрын
The skin of the model on the Fuji looks pretty plain and weird.
@TheSlantedLens 10 ай бұрын
Color is a personal preference and how sensors work with skin tones are part of the reasons why people choose different camera manufacturers.
@BiggeDink Жыл бұрын
Over the years I've had more dependable operation from Canon cameras than Fujifilm cameras, otherwise I'd prefer the XT-5. Your lighting for the talking head segments is very nice.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your view point and thanks for the compliment!
@iRorik Жыл бұрын
Fuji colors are fantastic.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
They really are.
@gerardhore2532 Жыл бұрын
Use the adaptor and you have a larger range of lenses for the Canon
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, good point. That is another option.
@michaelwhiles5282 Жыл бұрын
Ps - as both a Canon and Fuji user - it’s a massive win for the Fuji ❤️
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your opinion!
@jaymills1720 Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLensAF is so bad
@Jessehermansonphotography 11 ай бұрын
The results say; not massive.
@DanceDeepDas Жыл бұрын
Winner : fujifilm ❤
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your preference!
@steven871 Жыл бұрын
Correction. There are thousands of canon lenses that fit with a $79 adapter, third-party and Canon
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Maybe not thousands. But good point about using an adapter.
@cy9nvs Жыл бұрын
If we're going by that, the same can be said about fuji and other brands. There are adapters for all platforms. You can put the same lenses on a fuji.
@steven871 Жыл бұрын
@@cy9nvs agree.
@steven871 Жыл бұрын
@@cy9nvs correct. Thats why the “not many lenses” statement from a reviewer is intellectually dishonest
@steven871 Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens you are correct. I retract my hyperbole
@gradypicinich2404 Жыл бұрын
Duel SD card slots?? Each card will have to fight to the death for dominance!!
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Dual. Did we have a typo? Thanks for watching!
@gradypicinich2404 Жыл бұрын
@TheSlantedLens I figured 😂 yea it's at 5:50. Great video!
@paleyosezi3122 Жыл бұрын
This guy has some lovely daughters
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Can't claim them. Lots of good talent here in LA.
@farthercribtm1649 9 ай бұрын
R7 is ISO invariance ++++
@64mkb Жыл бұрын
She's beautiful
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching and keep on clickin!
@withoutpassid 9 ай бұрын
R7 is miles ahead of the XT-5. XT-5 body is just more aesthetic but much less functional.
@TheSlantedLens 9 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing your preference!
@withoutpassid 9 ай бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens still waiting for your a6700 vs x-s20 comparison ^__^
@TedNghiem Жыл бұрын
Fuji’s premium lenses are way more affordable over canon’s.
@mbismbismb Жыл бұрын
But canon’s AF in lens performance are waaaay better than Fuji’s
@spinkscapes775 Жыл бұрын
They're not really comparable though. Fuji's top tier are not as good as Canon's new RF offerings. You get what you pay for.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, the Fujifilm lenses are affordable. Canon lenses are generally pretty pricey. That is something to consider when getting into a system.
@robertbland5131 2 ай бұрын
We’re not seeing what this fellow is seeing looks like Fuji auto focus is doing really well. I think this guy just don’t know how to really set the camera up.. you don’t watch it. This fellow is kind of bias. Canon fanboy…. !!!
@TheSlantedLens 2 ай бұрын
We are not sponsored by any camera company and try to be as fair as possible.
@vimalneha Жыл бұрын
Looks like Fuji sponsored video! Auto-focus is the most sought-after feature for a camera, IBIS is the second. Canon has full R series super fine lens. 1.6 crop factor is better than 1.5. This means more reach. This man is dishonest to the core. No one needs 5 mp viewfinders. High MP means poor low light performance 30 mp for crop sensor is itself quite high.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
We were not sponsored by either camera company. Just sharing what we see.
@lbeetech Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens I'm not buying your assessments either, seem Fuji biased....
@lbeetech Жыл бұрын
Fuji bias from the start...
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Not so, just telling it like we see it.
@lbeetech Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLensWhich is slanted towards Fuji...
@pojemario Жыл бұрын
So Fuji wins no doubt but some unearned points went to Canon, because yeah, this is the nature of this channel, be nice to everyone 😂
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yeah, we try to be fair. Thanks for watching!
@karlgunterwunsch1950 Жыл бұрын
The ergonomics on the Fuji is horrible, wouldn't want to touch one if my life depended on it. What an idiotic metric that makes "contrast detect" a plus. It's a big minus if the camera needs to resort to that back water type of focusing. Why didn't the reviewer notice that the Fuji images in the noise test were almost a stop underexposed compared to the Canon.
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
Yes, we noticed that the Fujifilm images were darker in all of the tests. We find the same thing when we review Sony cameras. Thanks for watching!
@karlgunterwunsch1950 Жыл бұрын
@@TheSlantedLens So you are comparing apples to oranges, the Fuji were found to be shooting about 2/3rd of a stop lower ISO than indicated. So any noise performance comparisons you may have made were made on the wrong premise that the Fuji were adhering to the same sensor gain levels, they are not correct. So compare ISO ISO 5000 on the Fuji with ISO 3200 on the Canon - what is then going to happen? The Fuji is going to look significantly worse across the whole range. Also your dynamic range tests are screwed up by this incorrect ISO interpretation.
@lbeetech Жыл бұрын
@@karlgunterwunsch1950 This guy doesn't know what he's doing...
@mbismbismb Жыл бұрын
Fuji better image quality than Canon’s? Hahahaha stoopp
@TheSlantedLens Жыл бұрын
So you must think the Canon is better. Thanks for sharing your preference!
Oddly Satisfying
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
Thierry Gibralta
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Gareth Danks
Рет қаралды 135 М.