Jesus Christ is the Truth.

@@apollo8352 God help you🙏

@@apollo8352 This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true. - John 21:24

@@apollo8352 That's impossible because God will judge the sexually immoral. Jesus Christ is sinless.

@@ericsower7022 Hi there.... so what a technical discrepancy! I will tell you what, it is claimed to be the word of god and without error....for if it had errors then god would be fallible which is kind of a big thing in religion. The point I hope you see is because of 'a technical error' or blatant lies you really cannot trust Paul's scriptures to be reliable testimony. You of course know Paul did not have his claimed conversion until some time after 36AD, while the Jesus guy died in 30 or 33AD, depending on who is counting...So Paul never actually meet Jesus before his death, nor did Paul witness any of the biblical claims which is another big deal considering his scriptures make most of the main bible claims! Remember Galatians 1:11-16 Paul's scriptures contain no eye witness accounts, no information from any other person and no information from any other source, that is if you can believe Paul! See were this is going?

Next go to the sites of the first seven original churches in western Anatolia.

READ ! Timothy ch.4 ,v.1-3 ............"TEACHINGS OF DEMONS "....... & "forbidding TO MARRY ", read , MATHEW CH.23. V 9 Do not call ANYONE on earth FATHER. !!

According to the Holy Quran, Jesus didn't claim that he was the son of Allah(God) But He said... Zuhruf 64 I seek refugee in Allah from the Satan. In the name of Allah ,Rahman ,Rahim "Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. This is a straight path." ----------------- And on the resurrection day Allah will ask Jesus about the Christian faith. Quran - Maaide 116-118 And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (gods) besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness. If You should punish them - indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them - indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. ---------------- If you love Jesus, accept him as a Messenger not as the God and not as the son of Allah. If you are follower of Jesus, believe in Messenger Muhammad, too. Because that's what he really wants you to do. And he heralded the coming of Messenger Muhammed. Jesus said to his people this👇👇👇 Quran -Saff -6 And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic." Quran -Women 171 O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. ---------------------------- I invite you to be a Muslim. Latest, last and only valid religion in the Hereafter. First step is to say "I witness that there is no god but ALLAH, and i witness that Mohammad is Messenger of Allah" and believe in this. Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah doesn't accept the existence of false deities and He orders humanity to believe in only one God, Him. He explains why it is impossible the existence of gods other than Him in Holy Quran in chapter Isra which means The Night Journey and in chapter Enbiya which means Prophets. Quran-Isra-43 Say, [O Muhammad], "If there had been with Him [other] gods, as they say, then they [each] would have sought to the Owner of the Throne a way." Exalted is He and high above what they say by great sublimity. The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [Allah] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving. Quran-Prophets-22 Had there been within the heavens and earth gods besides ALLAH, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe. -------------------- Six Pillars of Faith in Islam 1-To believe in Omnipotent Allah (GOD) (without ascribing partners to Him. Without saying "He has a son." Without saying "He has a helper out of weakness") 2-Angels (Without giving them woman names. Without saying "They are daughters of Allah") 3-All Holy Scriptures (Books revealed by Allah) 4-All Messengers (accepting them as human beings not gods or sons of God) 5-Judgement Day (Resurrection Day) 6-Destiny Five Pillars of Islam 1- SHAHADA To say "I witness that there is no god save Allah, and i witness that Muhammad is His Messenger." 2- SALAT To perform prayer 5 times a day. 3- SAWM Fasting in the month Ramadan according to lunar calendar. (29-30 days) 4- ZAKAT If you are rich you give alms to poor people. 5- HAJJ To make the pilgrimage to Mecca, Kaba if you can afford. You become a pilgrim after this visit.

Allah is satan. Islam was invented by satan to try undermine the one and only true God and Jesus. Please read. Exodus 20 1-5 The existence of allah and mohumad is a blasphemy to the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus says NOBODY comes to the Father EXCEPT through ME! The only way to salvation is through repentance of your sins and belief that the Lord Jesus Christ Yeshua died on the cross for our sins and iniquity and was raised back to life on the third day (as witnessed by hundreds) your salvation is not by works or how many times a day you pray but through the blood of Christ JESUS who died for YOU and me. I will pray for you brother. You must repent, reject Islam and follow JESUS, the son of David and Abraham!

I'll see you as a Muslim soon

Any modern scholar uses CE and BCE.

@@nbenefiel And for what reason should they stop calling the presocratics - the philosophers before Socrates - by the name of presocratics? Catholics will so easily follow after the communists. It is a marriage made in heaven.

​Any modem woke scholar​@@nbenefiel

@David19746 Why? Most of us don't feel it is normal driving from orgy too orgy hopping from bed to bed from filthy harlot to filthy harlots. That's why. We shouldn't just change things just because a radical pointy headed professor thinks we should.

@@WilliamJones-sf5pt The early Christians lived communally and shared their incomes. We haven’t done that since the fourth century.

Mathew 17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[b] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[c] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[d] loosed in heaven Rock/peter/cepha

There are so many things wrong in this video!

MATTHEW CHAPTER 16: VERSE 18.ARE 3 PARTS #1. THE CHANGING NAME OF SIMON BAR-JONAH > SIMON CEPHAS [ JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 41- 42.] #2. THE ANOUCEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY AGAINST HELL AND THE GLORIOUS LIFE. IN VERSE 21. REPEATING VERSE 18.#1. THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH #2. 2ND THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT RESURRECTION THESE WAS CONFIRMED AND ATTESTED BY APOSTLE PAUL IN 1ST CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 15: ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES [ PLURAL SCRIPTURES FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT 1. GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 15. THE BIRTH OF THE HOLY SEED SACRIFICE. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE LAMB < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 21. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY OF LIFE < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 24. ISAIAH CHAPTER 6: VERSE 13.THE HOLY SEED ISAIAH CHAPTER 7: VERSE 14 ISAIAH CHAPTER 8: VERSE 14- VERSE 16 ISAIAH CHAPTER 9: VERSE 6 ISAIAH CHAPTER 40: VERSE 3,VERSE 23. ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11 ISAIAH CHAPTER 43: VERSE 10,VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 44: VERSE 6,VERSE 8 ISAIAH 45: VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 53: VERSE 10, VERSE 15 LUKE CHAPTER 1: VERSE 35.THE HOLY SEED MATTHEW CHAPTER 1: VERSE 18 THE HOLY SEED LUKE CHAPTER 2: VERSE 32 MATTHEW CHAPTER 12: VERSE 21.[ ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1, VERSE 6,VERSE 11. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE PLAN OF REDEMPTION AND SALVATION> MALACHI CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11.> ACTS CHAPTER 9: VERSE 5,VERSE 15,VERSE 17-18. < JOHN CHAPTER 10: VERSE 16.LETTER B.,JOHN CHAPTER 15: VERSE 20.,JOHN CHAPTER 17: VERSE 20., JOHN CHAPTER 20: VERSE 21.I.N.G, VERSE 29.LETTER B. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE REDEMPTION AND SALVATION. ) ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 18,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. THE 1ST APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE HOLY SEED , IN THE NEW TESTAMENT #2. 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < ISAIAH CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16,VERSE 19. JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19,VERSE 21,VERSE 22. MATTHEW CHAPTER 10: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 26: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: THE 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY #3. THE 3RD APPEARING OF GOD SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING OF GOD> LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27. NO LONGER AS LAMB, NO LONGER AS PRIEST, NO LONGER AS PRINCE, BUT LORD OF lords, KING OF kings, GOD OF gods < JOSHUA CHAPTER 22: VERSE 22., JEREMIAH CHAPTER 10: VERSE 10. 2ND THESALONIANS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 8. ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23., MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.THE LORD GOD ALL MIGHTY. 🙏 HE SHALL COME AND REIGN IN MOUNT OF OLIVES 🫒 MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23.LETTER C. IN MOUNT ZION, IN JERUSALEM, IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱, NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE PARTS OF THE EARTH/ GLOBE/ WORLD. TO REIGN 1,000 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲

LIKE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT GOD APPEARED TO PROPHET ABRAHAM 3XTIMES IN DIFFERENT WAYS [ NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY, BUT IN DIFFERENT TIMES OF SITUATIONS] #1. 1ST APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 14: VERSE 18. IN PRIESTHOOD APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 2,VERSE 20. IN ANGELIC JUDGE APPEARANCE IN GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 14. HE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM AND SARAH TO COMING BACK AGAIN. #3. 3RD APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM IN GENESIS CHAPTER 21: VERSE 1. IN LIFE APPEARANCE. THE SAME IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 3XTIMES APPEARANCE #1. 1ST APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 1:VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 28,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. AS SACRIFICE LAMB APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19, VERSE 21,VERSE 22., MATTHEW CHAPTER 10:: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 16: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: AS GLORIFIED BODY [ OF THE HOLY SEED < JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 24., JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 28., JOHN CHAPTER 13:: VERSE 31- VERSE 32., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 22., JUDAS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 3, VERSE 9,VERSE 20.THE MOST HOLY FAITH. #3. 3RD APPEARING SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27 LUKE CHAPTER 21: VERSE 25- 26 MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. MATTHEW CHAPTER 25: REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18, REVELATIONS CHAPTER 19: ISAIAH CHAPTER 24 VERSE 23. AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9. DANIEL CHAPTER 7: VERSE 9,VERSE 13. IN GLORIOUS ANCIENTS DAYS, ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23. IN ANCIENTS GLORIOUSLY REIGN. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲

fairytales

Absolutely agree the reason the early heresies were in the East is that’s where most of the battles over beliefs was waged Rome was pretty much a backwater in comparison to Constantinople

​@@sewwhat6525 En Occidente es muy antiarrianismo por la herejía que duró más en el reino visigodo y lombardo.

Yeah I've been having these thoughts, mostly for conversion reasons. Unbelievers will throw this stuff at you all day but also it really is quite interesting. For example as you state as much as I disagree with Catholic doctrine(s) I cannot discount the fact that I wouldn't know anything about Christ if the CC were not is it was in terms of dominance. It's where I step back and just trust that God knows what he is doing.

​@@greglongmore6503 So you disagree with the Catholic teachings, do you? Hmm, so what is it ? You disagree with is it about divorce perhaps? Jesus was really clear about that! Matthew 19: 9 Now I say this to you: anyone who divorces his wife -- I am not speaking of an illicit marriage -- and marries another, is guilty of adultery.'

​@@greglongmore6503 About Idolatry Exodus 20:4 You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters. The Lord did not prohibit statues; he prohibited worshiping them. God actually commanded the making of images. Just five chapters later, God commanded Moses to build the Ark of the Covenant, which would contain the presence of God and was to be venerated as the holiest place in all of Israel. Here is what God commanded Moses concerning the statues on it: And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends (Ex. 25:18-19). In Numbers 21:8-9, not only did our Lord order Moses to make another statue in the form of a bronze serpent, but he commanded the children of Israel to look at it in order to be healed. The context of the passage is one where Israel had rebelled against God, and a plague of deadly snakes was sent as a just punishment. This statue of a snake had no power of itself-we know from John 3:14 that it was merely a type of Christ-but God used this image of a snake as an instrument to effect healing in his people. Further, in 1 Kings 6, Solomon built a temple for the glory of God, described as follows: In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. . . . He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. . . . He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers, in the inner and outer rooms. . . . For the entrance to the inner sanctuary he made doors of olivewood. . . . He covered the two doors of olivewood with carvings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers; he overlaid them with gold (1 Kgs. 6:23, 27, 29, 31, 32). King Solomon ordered the construction of multiple images of things both “in heaven above” (angels) and “in the earth beneath” (palm trees and open flowers). After the completion of the temple, God declared he was pleased with its construction (1 Kgs. 9:3). It becomes apparent, given the above evidence, that a strictly literal interpretation of Exodus 20:2-5 is erroneous. Otherwise, we would have to conclude that God prohibits something in Exodus 20 and elsewhere commands the very same thing. Why would God use these images of serpents, angels, palm trees, and open flowers? Why didn’t he heal the people directly rather than use a “graven image”? Why didn’t he command Moses and Solomon to build an ark and a temple without any images at all? First, God knows what his own commandments mean. He never condemned the use of statues absolutely. Second, God created man as a being who is both spiritual and physical. To draw us to himself, God uses both spiritual and physical means. He will use statues, the temple, or even creation itself to guide us to our heavenly home. Psalm 19:1 tells us: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Romans 1:20 says: “Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.” Gazing at a sunset-or a great painting of a sunset-and contemplating the greatness of God through the beauty of his creation is not idolatry. Nor is it idolatrous to look at statues of great saints of old and honor them for the great things God has done through them. It is no more idolatrous for us to desire to imitate their holy lives and honor them than it was for Paul to exhort the Corinthians to imitate his own holy life (1 Cor. 4:16) and to “esteem very highly” those who were “over [the Thessalonians] in the Lord and admonish [them]” (1 Thess. 5:12-13). Having statues honoring God or great saints brings to mind. For Catholics, having statues is just as natural as-having pictures in our wallets to remind us of the ones we love here on earth. But reminding ourselves of loved ones is a far cry from idolatry.

In the face of common sense you believe a fairytale

Yet Jesus explained being born again is by baptism, thus naming water and the spirit. Not some made up self pronouncement.

@@dan_m7774 The point, one can't see the kingdom of God, much less, enter into it. John 3:3 is something He does, and it's not accomplished by man, human effort. Nicodemus thought it was re-entering the womb. He had a carnal understanding on the nature of the kingdom. It doesn't come with observation. And, no one's soul salvation hinges on a piece of real estate on a piece of dirt in the middle east. 2 Corinthians 5:16; John 4:21

Explained well....

@@georgebentonjr3876 Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible.

@@dan_m7774 ""Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible."" end quote. One of the reasons that Christ was a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense was because He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom: My kingdom is not of this world - John 18:36; the kingdom of God is within you - Luke 17:20-21. Clearly, the majority of the Jews missed their Messiah because they were looking for a physical kingdom. The disciples too, were looking for a physical kingdom, prior to Pentecost, they held that expectation and view. After Pentecost, when they received the Holy Spirit, Who led them "into all truth" and taught them of the "things to come," their understanding of the nature of the kingdom was enlightened, and they no longer taught of a physical kingdom. Rather, they applied spiritual interpretations to Old Testament prophecies, used them to describe the Church, and associated the kingdom with the gospel. The veil of Moses had been removed.

My thought as well. Good catch

Its good place to send your son whos caught masterbating to gay porn.he will fit right in.

EXACTLY. I was just going to say this… In fact, the Romans didn’t care at all about Jesus when he was preaching

👏🏼 right on however the Romans feared the rising of Jesus’s followers because they were willing to die for the faith so in order to control the people they created the Catholic church in order to embrace the christian’s & have the control- there’s many documentary’s about this, & it makes sense - the catholic church doesn’t even follow Jesus’s teachings why? because they truly didn’t know the truth & the way which is Jesus! they worship Mary not Jesus

I did a double take on that too. Christ was no politician, or governmental political agitator, at all, though he did get under the skin of the Pharisees and Sadducees, quite often, which was a good thing, but it got him crucified. I still picture those Jewish religious leaders saying to each other, "We got him. No more trouble from him."

Luke was a doctor?

@@nosuchthing8 Yep, a "Greek" (or non-Jewish) doctor. The other 3 gospel accounts were written by Jews. Luke's gospel is arranged more like a historical account, mostly in temporal order. The other three are arranged thematically, with less regard for how events unfolded along the timeline.

There were several direct inaccuracies about what is written in the NT. I get the impression the makers got most of this from 2nd hand sources as opposed to taking it directly from the NT and the Gospels. There is no other book in the world where the 2nd hand accounts of the text is more inaccurate that the Bible. Both books and secular scholars just flat out claim the exact opposite of what the text says on a regular basis. And its goes totally unquestioned.

Luke lived and worked many years along side Paul and the Apostles, the opening of his gospel makes clear he worked diligently with purpose to record a declaration of the first hand eyewitnesses of Christ from the beginning and give assurance that the order and detail of these things are for certain. The vid also said "illiterate" fisherman. WOW That is grossly inaccurate as most fishermen were basically small business owners who had to be literal to run their business under the Roman Empire. Fisherman were in fact more literal and better educated than the average citizen.

I can see that the guy who tells the story, didn't read the bible.

Lies again? Cup Series USD SGD

Not true for there are places throughout the New Testament that Jesus is teaching non Jews, many of them became followers.

Actually, gentiles were not accepted until Peter's ministry. ref Acts chapter 10 with the convertion of Cornelius which was btw 50-55AD about 20 years after Jesus's death

Many gentiles did follow Jesus but were never accepted into the fold. When Jesus encounters a Jew He says follow me but when encountering a gentile, even if the gentile says' I want to follow you', Jesus says no, go now and tell others what you have seen. I'm afraid even Jesus rejected the gentiles because He was trying to fix Judaism first

@@marcelsantos203 Yes for the most part Jesus did avoid gentiles but scriptures show He did not turn them away if they needed His help. See Matthew 15:22, Luke 7:1-10 and John 4 as well.

Jesus was referring to Peter’s confession as the foundation not Peter the man.

@@corsairman1956 Among all the other disciples Peter recognises Jesus as the messiah

@@corsairman1956 Then why did Jesus give Peter the authority to bind and loosen?

@@corsairman1956 So you're making a specific interpretation, which differs from the Church. By what authority do you make this interpretation? Are you infallible? How do you know you're right? If God gave us His inerrant word, wouldn't He have also left an inerrant interpreter, so that we wouldn't fall into arguments (like they kind you're making)?

@@kdmdlo Hi, what ‘Church’ are you referring to?

I agree that Paul did not strip the gospels of their Jewish content, but the gospels happened before Paul even got saved and then later on wrote letters to different parts of the body of Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ). To say his letters preceded the gospels doesn’t make sense. But out of curiosity, what do you mean?

He means Paul wrote his letters before the gospels were written

@@FreeinChristForever not only it make sense, it is possible to demonstrate gospels were inspired by paulinism. Of course, hardline believers will remain in denial.

@@tulenik71 What in the world is “paulism?” Is this some new type of religion that I’ve never heard of? If you’re speaking of Paul the apostle then he’d be the first in line to be a witness AGAINST you for before he was Paul he was Saul and Saul hated ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with Christ and His followers to the point of putting them in prison to murdering them.

​@FreeinChristForever we all know what paulism iS. pauls take on christinaity. Focus more on faith than works, play down jewish practices like removal of foreskin, etc.

Count me out. I threw that monkey off my back six decades ago.

​@@maxwelldownham235 good for you never worship false idols

It was "universal" in its conception by Constantine, who incorporated much paganism into his version of Christianity in order to appeal to as many people as possible, including the pagans. All those apostasies remain today. And the pope fully intends to force Romanism upon the world again, complete with compulsory Sunday laws just like in the dark ages.

@@ff6605 Catholics worship Jesus. Contrary to popular belief, the “praying to Mary” is not worship but rather intercession. “Hail Mary full of grace… pray for us sinners.” They ask Mary to pray for them. They would never do that when praying to Jesus because that’s who they are worshiping and asking for help, forgiveness, blessing etc.

​@@ff6605 you don't worship the apostles, protestantismn isn't true Christianity

And one was a fisherman and the other a teenager. Do you think fishermen were literate in the bronze age?

Actually, They were all ignorant poor men, otherwise they’d never fall for Christ’s bs. 😂

@@someguy5438 They were way passed the bronze age by that point but your point still stands. Also Matthew didn't work in the 'IRS' lol, he was just a straight up tax collector

@firelxrd420 3300 BC The Bronze Age timeline is different in areas all over the world so the years can change depending on each historical civilization. However, most historians agree that it began around 3300 BCE and lasted almost 2000 years until around 1200 BCE. Dong correct me if you are wrong.

@@someguy5438 How am I wrong? You literally just said it lasted until around 1200 BC. So a thousand years before Christ. And we're talking about the antourage of Christ. What?

Thst's right.👍

I'm with you!

They just repeats the same non sense over and over.

Roman Catholicism is one earthly/mundane organization inspired by Lucifer himself, an entity if you will, promoting an absolute mockery of what Christianity really is through very aggressive marketing/financial/influence/power goals. It's as cheap, religious and false as all others such as Judaism, Islam, Mormon, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Hinduism, Hare Krishna or Buddhism...just to mention a few. The saddest part is how most christians look at our movement and our Lord and Savior JesusChrist. Their idea, for the most part, is greatly erratic flirting with pure blasphemy.

yeah i wanted to support this channel but it’s just another one of those mass produced garbage channels, if you’re making informational videos you have an obligation to fact check

Here in New York City watching 2023 9:21 p.m. Thursday September 21

@@nadiaestrella2153 LMFAO🤣 thank you for reading my comment here in New York City reading yours Friday September 22nd 1:16 p.m. drinking coffee and walking on 14th Street Union Square heading for the train station to disappear LOL🤣

⁠@@timeisapathwalkingtounderstandI’m watching the video and reading you comment here in Luxembourg, Europe at 1:50am Thursday March 7th needing to get some sleep but chuckling reading your comments. Much love ❤

I wonder why the authhordox church in Ethiopia survived the Catholic establishment

Especially if uncredentialled idiots like the creator of this video post factually inaccurate information.....

Good point: he would hardly have that many gentile disciples and so few Jewish ones: this looks like a later gloss

😂 Anyone could write that. The entire book sounds fictional

Five eyewitnesses is not true.

It’s called “the living Word.”

Wrong! At the time when England depended for her military power on archers using the longbow one of the mediaeval monarchs ruled that yew trees should be grown round churches so there would be an assured supply of the wood.

That would make sense. I'm not sure which of you is correct. I know the church did have a tendency to override pagan tradition though. So, I don't consider what you're saying out of the realm of possibility. That sounds about right though as God has been known to do that. He did that when he freed the slaves from Egypt. The feud also turned into a battle of who's God or gods were more powerful between Moses and the Priests. Each of the plagues directly corresponded with an Egyptian god and by the third one the Priests were noticably shaken. They watch the God of Moses systematically dominate each of their Gods as a display. He saved the sun and the Pharos son himself (as they were seen as gods) for last. By the end of if most of the priests had to declare that the God of the Israelites MUST be Lord. Even in modern times scientists have confirmed that the plagues can be explained by a series of natural phenomena (some of which are historically verifiable and the others make scientific sense to follow) on a much larger scale than has ever been seen. That also makes sense as the Egyptian gods were nature gods. He displayed total dominion over the earth. In the end though can you really be mad at a king for demonstrating that he IS in fact King?

@@andrewdarley8988 a

@@kelseythomson4418 .

Christianity stole so many pagan things. Xmas day pagan festival. Jesus born in sept. Easter pagan festival. Harvest festival pagan. Then islam copied many Christian things.

Yes , and the "church" we should build for our GOD , should be a spiritual church. We have Spirit of the Almighty in our hart's , our body's are our temple's , we must serve Him in truth and Spirit ...John 4 : 24

It can call itself whatever it wants, but its not the universal church. Its just a large sect that falls under the banner of Christianity. There is also a large sect that calls itself the Church of Christ. Does that mean it alone is the church of Jesus and the rest are not? Of course not, its just a name of a sect.

@@Orange6921 what he means the catholic word means "universal" dzuh🙄

@@Orange6921 It is the universal church though.

@@versenelol5083 No, its not. There are massive churches and determinations all across the world that reject the pope and RCC doctrines because of the Bible. Its no more universal than any other denomination.

you can be proud of that, but not the roman catholic church. it has too many man-made doctrines and practices which defy the word of God, such as mariology.

The bible says, "pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall." So, which comes first, religion, which can't save you, or the son of the living God?

It's nonsense you fool

Pride made lucifer the evil one. God resists tge proud but gives grace to the humble.

@@robinthomas2847 some people put, their religion above, Christ, which is the same as the lord mentioned about, "having, the two masters."

Jesus Rules and Romans drool.

Paul speaks highly of the church known as The Way, later known as Christians in Antioch. This is in stark contrast to the counterfeit church/state hybrid known as the papacy, which bears little resemblance to the pure, non-politically involved, popeless church of apostolic times, which did not go about killing "hetetics" in the holocaust known as the Catholic inquisitions.

​@@TIJoe-te9quyou're a fool. Stop.

@@TIJoe-te9qu Nothing you said even makes sense. The Holocaust was committed by German socialists not Catholics 😂 are you stupid?

​@@TIJoe-te9quExactly! More people need to read Foxes Book of Martyrs !

@@Revelation18-4 I don't know how papists can turn a blind eye to those ruthless mass murders done as "service to God. "

ㅁㄷㅅ: ?? 기이한

​@@SoyebAkhtar1918If Jesus were a prophet, a true prophet speaks truth for God. See Mosaic Law of the prophet. Jesus said He would rise from the dead three days and nights after His death. If His prophesy is true, then His Resurrection makes Him to be God for no one, but God can raise Himself from the dead. Either He told the truth or He did not. If He did not speak the truth, why then would Muhammed call Him a great prophet?

Pretty sure it's not a human narrator.

@@3ggshe11swhat makes you say that? did he mispronounce a word or just because of how good it sounds

@@SpotlightGraphics It's AI, text to speech

When Jesus and the Apostles preached, the Old Testament was all they used (they didn’t use the apocryphal books that the Rome cult uses)

​@@chrislachat459of course because the Old Testament existed before the New Testament. What was Rome's connection to the New Testament that you mentioned it like it was the creation of Rome? Read your history!!

So what is your point? The New Testament derived a lot from the Old Testament and is a continuation and fulfilment of the old. What's the problem?

In other words you don't know how to respond.

@@nosuchthing8 There are errors of fact

@@andrewplater1782 like what

Christianity spread like wild fire. Because of the many whitnesses who heard Christ's teaching and saw his miracles. Many were being tortured, crucified, persecuted fed to lions. There's sources even outside scripture of the followers of christ being many and growing the Roman's were taking it as a threat and tried to extinguish them. But the more they tried the more converts would arise. There's mention of the followers of christ written from the jews, historians, roman soldiers. It took 300 years for the Roman's to make Christianity legal and the Roman's were being converted .. so yes it was an explosion. It was a movement, a fire that couldn't be put out. So what would you call that?

@@curtiscote 400 years

@@VampireHub616 400 years what. Are you referring to my comment of 300 yrs till rome accepted christ? Because if christ was crucified between 30-33 ad it would make 300 yrs exact to constantine The Fifty Bibles of Constantine were Bibles in the original Greek language commissioned in 331 by Constantine I and prepared by Eusebius of Caesarea.!

The SILLY SH^T HUMANS BELEAVE is unreal!!!! TT4N Slaves...

Christianity is pagan tp the core, when Constantine made Christianity the State religion of the Roman Empire is when it exploded because no other religion was allowed.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbiZormr27mxmo0.html

Have you proof that the bible is inspired by god? The bible is not god's word, but man made.

@@heinmolenaar6750 The New Testament is man made inspired by Jesus. The Old Testament is man made inspired by God. Hope that clears up the confusion....

@@serpentsepia6638 ALL scripture is inspired by God, God-breathed, men wrote as led by the Holy Spirit. ALL of the Bible is God's Word.

Christianity as sutch , is mixed with Baàl (Nimrod who was incarnated by Satan ) , birthday is 25 Desember , easter rabbits and eggs , is the firtillaty god where they slept together , and 9 month's later these baby's were on the Baàl altaar. Al these "Christain hollydays are Baàl hulliday's. Jew's pray to Satan , there father ( John 8: 44) and the Jew started every Christain religion and walked away with the money. Catholic chuch treasurekeeper is Rotschild of London.

In response to the goodness of the Reformation, Loyola was commissioned to found the jez-ewe-it order, whose sole mission was to suppress the truth of the reformers, who had positively identified the popes as the biblical antichrist power. This order was to use any means, including mass murder, just like the inquisitions, to accomplish this task. They are one of the most despicable groups to curse the face of the earth, so dastardly that Jefferson and Lincoln warned us about them, and even several popes outlawed them THAT'S pretty bad.

quote--- At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.--unquote -----quote--- There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus.--unquote ------St. Ignatius of Antioch, also called Ignatius Theophoros (Greek: “God Bearer”), (died c. 110, Rome; Western feast day October 17; Eastern feast day December 20), bishop of Antioch, Syria (now in Turkey), known mainly from seven highly regarded letters that he wrote during a trip to Rome, as a prisoner condemned to be executed for his beliefs. He was apparently eager to counteract the teachings of two groups-the Judaizers, who did not accept the authority of the New Testament, and the docetists, who held that Christ’s sufferings and death were apparent but not real. The letters have often been cited as a source of knowledge of the Christian church at the beginning of the 2nd century. -----

cool bro

@@mitchellosmer1293 The first Ignatius sounds MUCH more sincere than Loyola, who founded the abominable jesuit order. Ignatius of Antioch was probably a sincere Christian, and not corrupted by the papacy, since Roman Catholicism did not begin until Constantine legislated it as the official state religion in AD 313. This is in contrast to the Romanist fable that the popes and the Catholic Church started with Peter.

@@TIJoe-te9qu You are deceived by the false teachers, confusing the word legislated with 'founded'. Constantine legislated the church, meaning he legalized it. Jesus founded it. By the way which sect or denomination you belong to?

Matthew was with Jesus, John was Jesus. Whoever wrote is knowing contradiction what was actually written in the Bible. and should have stated evidence immediately. Not blatantly lied. He is also deceived the listener. All the narrator has was site this and why. Knowingly deceiving. Came to get/find evidence of how 2nd century church leaders sold out. What real evidence pro or con , you won’t find it with fictional wishing. If you want to prove something fiction, you don’t start with fiction.

Of course, we are to understand that Jesus is like us, he understands our predicament and temptations and watches our success and failures and dis interest. And Mary His /Our mother also is watching.....O'My Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy Mercy.Amen.

@Pat Ludwain the year 382 AD Pope Damasus I gave the world the Bible!!! 73 books total!!! 46 books in the old testament, the one that Jesus read in the synagogues every Saturday!

I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan. Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop. I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians. Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to. Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to. Catholics think salvation is through the works. Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5. Catholics believe in baptizing babies. Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD

@Pat Ludwa Mt.8:14 and Lk.4:38 also mention Peters mother-in-law.

And if you do so with a true open heart, it is very obvious of the Catholic Church is the One True Church

On your journey, may I remind you that the Protestants split from the Catholic church during what is called the reformation, and in England, Henry separated from the Catholic church when he got the hump when the then pope wouldn't annull his marriage, as he didn't have grounds, so he went his own way and started killing those loyal to the Catholic church, and confiscated land and destroyed almost all Catholic buildings Westminster Abbey, was Catholic before the protest under Henry, the Protestants have only been around since the fifteenth or sixteenth century and before the reformation it was the great schism when the orthodox separated from Rome around A.D 1054 and Islam came on the scene about six to seven hundred years after Christianity

It seems you'll end up lost. It's a lot more complicated than that.

OR you can simply find the REMNANT CHURCH that fits the Scriptures in the Revelation _and They will tell you the Truths about how the Churches evolved and were known and guided by God all along .... 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the Commandments of God, and the Faith of Jesus 17And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ Rev.12 v.17 12Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith [testimony] of Jesus Rev.14 v.12 10. And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the Testimony of Jesus is the Spirit of Prophecy. KJV - Revelation 19:10 9. Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship God.10. KJV - Revelation 22:9 I highly recommend 'Conflict of the Ages' series of five books by Christian Author Ellen G. White (Authentic Seer/Prophet of God)..... "Patriarchs and Prophets" "Prophets and Kings" "The Desire of Ages" ☆(Life of Jesus)☆ " The Acts of the Apostles" "The Great Controversy between Christ and Satan" Ellen G.White, 1888, rev.1911

At the end of the day, People will always chose to believe what they wanted to believe and rejecting the truth with this simple rule: *FANATISM* With this rule, people will love the Religion system more than God their Creator the real Father. Jesus came to *Rebuke* His own people who put Religion above God. Even Peter and the 12 Disciples agreed: Act 5:29 - "We Obey God more than men." It means the Apostles totally understand the Gospel that Jesus brought from heaven.

What would anyone gain by arguing with your corked???

Don't even get me started on Peter Pan.

Yes, that is true, and great point. You can find that in his letter to the Symrnaeans, chapter VIII

The word Catholic means universal. So the Catholic church in the first century means the universal church. Hence why in the Anglican version of the Apostles Creed, the word 'catholic' is used.

@@jamespitcher6936 That is true. It can also be found in very fundamental Protestant Baptist Church’s statements of belief- “One Holy Catholic Church”. It merely means universal. The Universal Church is NOT the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church could be part of the Universal Church if they wanted to be…and they are very welcome!

@@joeswartz8286 Lol... Protestants pop up 400 years ago.

St Ignatius mentioned "Catholic Church" and he was thinking about Orthodox Church ..you guys in the west are not quite informed about the 2000 years old fact that orthodox church "official" name is One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church ...roman catholic church have tried to use the same title but it didn't worked ..also "catholic' doesn't mean "universal" that is primitive and poor latin translation ...catholic is a Greek word. Catholicity means fullness or perfection, wholeness ...there are many Patriarchates and all of them together are united ( in catholicity - Greek word) in to One Holly Catholic nd Apostolic Church also known as Orthodox Church A thousand years a go - Rome (as one of the patriarchates of the Orthodox church ) CAME OUT or split from the Orthodox Catholic Church and started to preach Roman Catholicism - a deviant and spiritually polluted version of Orthodox Catholicism

Hopefully I'm not coming across as difficult. "Rock" has been interpreted by Catholicism to mean "Peter", but that really make no sense, other than to fit the narrative of succession. Regardless, say it is Peter, how has the priesthood been carried forth unbroken since Peter? Can the Roman Catholic Church show a linage of priesthood authority from the time of Jesus to today? The Rock upon we must build is on Jesus Christ and revelation.

No, it started with council of Nicea in 325 AD

So you are going to start a church based on a man? (Peter) Based on a person who denied Jesus three times? (Peter) Based on the sinner that needed a savior? (Peter) Sorry, that not how its happened. The christian church is based on Jesus, as Jesus claim’s to be son of Man, God in the Flesh NOT on Peter… John 3:16-18 John 14:6 John 3:3

You are correct my brother Jesus did say that!

Whichever sins you retain, will be retained in Heaven. Like the sin of Protestantism.

Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Romes Catholic Church. It is Christ Himself that builds His body the church.

​@@georgebentonjr3876Catholic and Orthodox are the first Christians...

While I'm glad you enjoyed it, I found it went oddly deep into the mythology. Granted, I am in a minority here, but there was a Roman Catholic Church before the first century, and remained pagan until the latter half of the fourth century. I'm saying this as a practicing Catholic - we don't need to deny our history in order to accept our present reality.

@@MarcillaSmith Marcilla where are you from; because what you say about Roman Catholic church history is pure nonsense.

@@misscameroon8062 you are strangely curious for someone who thinks it's "nonsense." :: raised eyebrow :: In any event, I'm from a universe where the official religion of the Roman Church became Christianity in 380, in accordance with the Edict of Thessalonica of emperor Theodosius I. How about you? In what year did the Roman Church become Christian in your dimension?

@@MarcillaSmith I am not sure you didn`t get the wires crossed?Roman Catholic Church before the first century ? Exlpain.

@@misscameroon8062 When Christianity became the official state religion in the 4th century, there was already a Roman Catholic (universal) Church that administered the cult of the Emperor as well as the Capitoline Triad of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, and the rest of the ancient deities. The Temple of Jupiter came to be St. Peter's Basilica, and the pontifices of the old ways learned the new rites, and continued in their service to Rome and her God(s). There was no modern notion of separation of church and state. Julius Caesar was a pontiff before he was even consul, and even to this day, our Pope holds the title of Pontifex Maximus.

Well what do you think accounts for the difference? I assume it’s modern people looking at which book appears to come from which, like Luke and Matthew appear to come from Mark and Q, for example. I assume they’re using the Greek texts? I dunno what they’re looking for specifically.

@@rxw5520 Q is a modern theory, very questionable, NO manuscript evidence.

@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 You seem to be saying what I'm saying in your first sentence. Your 2nd sentence seems to disagree but I don't see your point. On your 3rd sentence, The gap I speak of is 3 generations and I list the 3 generations I am talking about.

@@glstka5710 Looking back at your comment, I misread it. I apologize for the misunderstanding. But I will say that is only a two generational gap. If we speak of Irenaeus, he is two places removed from John. If there was one more before Irenaeus, and after Polycarp or John, then it would be a 3 generation gap.

@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 I wasn't counting John as the 0th generation. John 1st, Polycar 2nd, Irenaeus 3rd. looks like we basically agree.

Me I am a student in Christ. I can not follow any religious group any longer and the word Christian makes me cringe no matter the denomination.

@@DanHutchings-xx7ug Jesus is just a story line, like 'Romeo & Juliet.' One doesn't believe in them literally; they believe in the love they have for one another. The love is real, the story of them is made up by a man like the Jesus story.

@@JustReed you ever studied any history while you were in school about the Roman Empire or Alexander the Great or perhaps the Persians and Babylonians. How about any stories about the country of Israel in those history books? Then again maybe you did not go to school? Need to know these things before I can reply to your lack of knowledge if all you know is Romeo and Juliet.

@@DanHutchings-xx7ug 8 lines of nothing said. What are you trying to say? Did your ego get ruffled about... what?

@@JustReed Ego not ruffled one bit for if you studied any history that covered those time periods you would see in the Bible they were prophesized much of what occurred a long time before they happened. The Bible when it comes to history has, was and is spot on when we look at the past, seeing what is occurring even now and with it's batting average at 100% plus I am quite sure what is to happen. Only a blind man would argue with the facts found written thousands of years before they occurred or an uneducated person that knows nothing. That is why I asked your back ground so I know where I need to start educating you at.

What changed?

​@Wendi Lane more than you are willing to accept

Yes, especially since Constantine changed Christianity into the official state religion called Catholicism in 313, and passed the first mandatory Sunday observance laws in 321, contrary to the 7th day Sabbath observed by Jesus, Paul, the rest of the apostles, the Gentiles, and of course the Jews as well.

Paul says in Ephesians 4:5 he had spent 15 days with him fellowshiping Gal.1:8. Hosea 4:6;Amos 3:3 .Peter was handed the keys to the New Testament Church in Matthew 16:13-20 to fulfill John 17:17-20& John 3:1-8. 2Tim.2:15 ,3:15-16. Luke 24:47-48, Mk. 16:16. Acts 1:8, 2:1-4, 2:36-47. Jesus is the door to heaven. Peter has the keys ? Acts 2:38 !!! But it’s locked because of the disobedience of Adam and Eve and the devil is still roaring and roaming seeking who he may devour. 1 Cor.15:1-4 Paul declared the Gospel the same as Peter did.

@deanashcraft1631 Yes, but here's the thing about the bible, though.... it's all made up. There's no reason to believe that it's God's word, and if you read it objectively then it's easy to see how there's no possibility way a perfect, all knowing all loving God had anything to do with it.

He was everything good, cool included and to a divine extent

Jesus was sound, he was a socialist.

@@mjramirez6008 He was very likely totally made up and a fraud by zealots of the church.

We have extra books in the Catholic Bible, like 6 or 7.

AND STILL CLUELESS

God sacrificed himself to himself where is the sacrifice love fairy tells

@@haroldkmayes3591 Not to mention that is stated in the Bible that no one can pay for the sins of others. Christianity is a bunch of nonsense created by Roman Empire.

@@zedwart8534 You're not wrong. But you're also no entirely correct either. True Christianity is about understanding that the antagonist is the self proclaimed God of the Old Testament. This has been hidden by both the Catholic faith and the Jews. Yahweh is, quite literally, Satan. Any child can make this connection and see the glaringly obvious contradiction between Yahweh and Yeshua when reading the bible for themselves. One commits infanticide, the other states that hurting children is wrong... One reveals himself to Moses and speaks to him face to face, the other states very clearly that God has never been seen by any man. There is a reason why Jesus calls Satan "The Father of Lies", he's been lying to the Jews for thousands of years...

@@haroldkmayes3591 Understanding sacrifice in the vein of gift with respect to the idea of covenant is the key to understanding Christian beliefs. I have no doubt you have no intention of properly doing so, but this was more for anyone that may read your comment.

​@@zedwart8534 God is Love, and with Love all things are possible! Trying to disprove this is like trying to prove you are not alive, Which I very much hope you don't! Facing the fire or the jump from the Twin Towers I'm pretty sure I would have jumped, but you don't know until you have to choose. I hope you choose life, by far the best option! 🙂

Wrong. Thanks for simplistic misunderstanding

Correct 100% about King Constantine. He spun the papacy into power with his political court, even mandating Sunday observation by law. Politics shounever mix with the church. Look what a killing machine the papacy became, slaying "hetetics" for the Roman empire. Disgusting murderers of millions. The whore was drunken with the blood of the saints, indeed.

No

@@cristianosiqueira1536 Yes. Your simplistic "no" cannot change the history books. Why not stop protecting the devil and his evil popes? Their whole job is to kill Protestants and their infants, according to the jesuit extreme oath of induction. "In her ( the papacy) was found the blood of ALL slain upon the earth."That's why the papacy is gong into the lake of fire very soon. Her cup of iniquity is full. I can't wait to see Romanism fried to a crisp for all the murders it has done.

Yes, in 313 the ruler Constantine claimed he had a dream that in the sign of 'IHS' ( really Isis, Horus, and Set), he would conquer. So he forced the Catholic church-state upon everyone, including Sunday enforcement laws with civil and criminal penalties for being caught working on his counterfeit Sunday-sabbath. The papacy thus began in tyranny, and aspires to rule the world once again with its Sun-day MARK OF THE BEAST. Coming soon :national Sunday laws per Poop Francisco's Laudato Si proclamation.

Why did you post this?

​@@ripcord8738 because it shows the entire point of the Catholic Church. Jesus changed Simon's name to rock, and said he would build his church on that rock.

​@@nosuchthing8 no he didn't say that, you believe that cause that's what catholic church teach.

@@OLPC80 it's straight from the Bible.

This was specifically for Peter

God bless you and you will get through this!! Amen

God be with you

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻Prayers for you

🙏🏻🙌🏻

I had cancer in my neck twice. They had to cut the main facial nerve to take the tumour out so half my face is paralyzed and my vision is affected, but 25 years later, I’m still here. I hope you will be too.

Jesus died during the reign of Tiberius.

Well unlearn it. It's not accurate.

@@pistoffpussycat5778 thank you. Not correct at all

don't listen to the negative comments to your post.... haters are everywhere now a days.

He definitely didn’t explain it correctly

If such record existed, probably they should have entered in, 3000+. The jews today do have 5000+ in their calendar !! Did you know that? The Roman's kept tally from their own conquest days

That's a question for ChatGPT

I don't know this for sure, but I think from the old testament readings, the birth would have been registered in the year of the ruler of that time 🤔 - look at how Daniel starts 1:1 "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim King of Judah ...." That was the way the year was identified. 💒

You're understanding is from the perspective of a 21st century westerner. There was not really much of a scientific methodology developed yet, women gave birth without anesthesia. Men fought in brutal war all over the planet with spears, swords, There was no economic development where the division of labor could shed most people from drudgery. There were no jobs involving pushing small buttons. People sacrificed their first born children burning them in fire 🔥. Daily existence anywhere didn't involve a call to Doordash. SO. Jews washing plates,separation of foods, some small sacrifice of flour, meal , a bovine, was worth being impaled and feed to a lion..Ok.if that maje sence to you .I didn't know why.

@@dannyjackson5189 I'm not saying people would risk being thrown to the lions over hygiene rules. Were there not much more restrictive aspects of ancient Judaism? If I was a Jew could I marry a gentile woman?

​@@Mettle_DAD Why would that matter why would you be hanging out with Gentile chicks anyways. Your mother and your father will get you a wife. And mostly the gentiles were enemies of the jewish people. It wasn't like Bridget loves Bernie. A fling with a sexy foreigner was probably not worth being flayed burned or pulled apart and changing your religion and losing your whole entire family.

​@@Mettle_DAD Those people lived in a different paradigm. They didn't live in the middle of the sexual revolution where everything is desire and sex. poured on. As I said the notion of romantic love and marriage are just recent things.

@@dannyjackson5189 institutionally the concept of "romantic love" is modern. But men and women through all time have sought out love not just utilitarian partnerships.yes back then women were considered property and essentially sold at a young age to a man willing to buy her. Which would probably be even more reason folks were looking for something different than that system. The old christian teachings aren't much of a step up. Everything is about man's subservience to God and women's subservience to men.....but it was a slightly better deal for women. They had relatively more freedom

Good point

What do you mean by Jew? Paul was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.

If Paul was always a Jew, then Catholic's who leave the Catholic church are always Catholic's. Which is true anyway because the Catholic Baptism leaves a indelible mark, which cannot be changed or erased. So if the Catholic leaves the Catholic church his Baptism remains intact. He does not lose his Catholic Baptism if Rebaptised he still retains his original Baptism. So Catholic's who leave the Catholic church will be purged of their dislike and disbelief, and some may be in Purgatory until the End of Time.

Paul may have functioned like St John the Baptist getting the gentiles prepared to know Jesus and repent. He claims only to have baptized Onesemose ( who later became a bishop). He admonishes about not receiving the Body and Blood of Jesus without acknowledging the fact, but he may not have been part of the priesthood to change the bread and wine into Christ's True Presence.

Mohammed pbuh couldn't read or write. He couldn't write the Quran, even if he wanted to.

@@dimplax5973 True, he dictated to people with good memory. So they say. Lots of texts were put together some decades later by a ruler who got the original witnesses to confirm the correctness they say. There was also lots of transcription mistakes later, when the high arabic writing was invented and the ones who wrote the quran in it, did not properly understand the mix of arabic and aramaic of the early texts, some philologist say. Much of the quran is summaries of synopses of biblic texts or just quotes from the bible.

The most laughable explanation I’ve been told, by an evangelical minister, about the Bible being translated over 400 times since creation of the printing press, is that “we need to trust the Holy Spirit was with the scribes.” We all know the telephone game, how one spoken brief message is whispered to another who is playing, and then that person whispers the simple statement to the next person to pass along . . the end resulting message tends to be very different from the initial message. Soooo . . when I don’t understand metaphor in Gospel scripture’s quotes attributed to Jesus, I don’t allow myself to become twisted over it.

The First Century the was only one Christian Church, different locations. Gnostic is not s church, but a philosophy. Principle influence of the Qoran was Old Testament which Muhammad qplagiarized & corrupted. There is no Syrian Anti-Trinitarian church that I'm aware of.

Really bad information. I suggest you read facts before writing flawed comments.

Well, that's exactly what Catholicism does. It distorts the truth.

Ese es la misma Iglesia Católica que Jesucristo fundó.

@@luismanuelpotencianonorato9672 how can it be the same Church when The Lord Jesus Christ commanded; "Freely you have received; freely give." In the catholic way, almost every sacrament requires payment, or in their words mandatory donations.

​​@@vincentisaacvoces2553Se não tiver condições não é obrigado a pagar

Spotonski !

Correct quotation of 1 Peter 5:13 (NIV) : She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.

@@ndumferdy2545 You're using a Non Inspired Version.

Augustus 1st emperor ???!!!

Proud to worship Nimrod, Isjtar and Tammuz? Sun worship??? With the Vatican build on pagan grounds, bendes crosses with Yesuah on it, thats not idolotry???....please learn symbolism. Worshipping Maria at shrines. Pilgrimages, praying beeds, do u need to go on???

@@sean6003 if they start about Trinity of "Jesus is God"........ask them one thing and one thing only....."how many Thrones are there in heaven according to the Bible?"...then Muslims should stop talking. They never answer

@@sean6003 Catholicism and Islam are two sides of the same coin. Watch Walter veith. Although he is creationist, he has a lot of proof by reliable sources. He even gives all sources. I thought the seminar was called total unslaught l- the Islamic connection. Yesuah was like God on earth because he had lived a sinless life. God is also a title given to judges in those regions. Funny thing is that islam uses Catholic teachings to debunk christianity and reinforce their own religion. While Catholicism is nothing else then the ancient secret religion of Babylon.

@@sean6003 what i also find funny is that Allah is allmighty, but he cant create a son, but Arent we all created to the image of Elohim..

To be fair the entire religion is shaped around what they chose to believe is canon so really between all denominations everyone just picks and chooses their interpretation. The books have no real sources and they have been modified more times than anyone could actually know so how important are the rules really? I think it is easy to know right from wrong and any good god would be more worried about how you treat each other than the semantics games humans played with doctrine they wrote for said god.

@@0bservationis1 the early Christian writings they identified were the most likely true sources from the disciples for the gospels based on texts that were known to be produced by the apostle or one of their direct disciples (each author had a known style). Even though they identified them as inspired writings in the second century they spread throughout the known world with different scribes copying the manuscripts they had at their disposal. The church realized that there was changes being made to some of the manuscripts that were not in other versions. So they realized they had an issue. By the fourth century they collected a copy of the manuscripts from all areas and began to compare all the inspired Christian writing we know of as the New Testament. Through comparing thousands of scribed versions they were able to see how the text was changed in one region that didn’t match what other regions had. By analyzing each of the variations they were able to construct the canon by rooting out the variances. This became cannon and the texts are stored in Latin. An unchanging version of language. The oldest manuscripts they have are preserved and the fragments are compared to modern interpretations. Even the Dead Sea scrolls when they were recovered were compared with the cannon to see if they matched and they do. What is left now with updating of the language to reflect modern language variations to make them easier to read. These are always compared to the original text to ensure accuracy.

“The way” or what was known simply as the church practiced what is described in the Bible. Breaking bread, fellowship, worship, praying, teachings or sermons(reading of scripts), fasting. After Christ gnostics and others perverted the words and fables of apocryphal nonsense. The canonized books were carefully chosen by what was taught and considered true, god inspired for the years that followed the Christ. Ignatius spoke of the Catholic Church as an adjective not a noun or church religion. Constantine a high pagan priest added to the teachings to form the RCC. Mixed paganism with Christianity to appease the pagans and have them convert comfortably. Catholicism has added traditions, rituals, practices and other unbiblical teachings making it not Christianity anymore. The first church in Jerusalem is nothing, night and day of what the RCC church is.

@@Everykneebows this is ignorance of what the early Christian’s wrote. The church fathers writings up to 4th century do follow Universal church traditions. From the lords day to confession to baptism to alms giving to anointing the sick to apostolic succession to the pope. What is a twisted version is protestantism who have zero history and makes up their own non-biblical traditions that are not supported by what the church fathers practiced

Correct, and Acts sure doesn't include any popes, Mary worship, purgatory, indulgences, praying to dead saints, relics, pilgrimages, priests, confession boxes to drunken priests who may be molesters, Sunday sacredness., etc, etc. Good old Constantine sure put his pagan spin on things.