Thank you Professor Leke Alder ❤❤❤

Wow!

Hold on, at 16:39 the syllogismic expression here sounds invalid because it doesn't follow the logic of syllogism; the minor premise should not infer a conclusion. Invalid expression: All pastors are bald Pastor Godman is bald (already infers that godman is a pastor & that he's bald) Therefore pastor godman is a pastor. Valid expression: All pastors are bald Godman is a pastor Therefore godman is bald. Anyone else catch that?