@Scott, I too own a QX55 and agree with you that the CVT is not as bad as some people have made it out to be. In certain driving conditions, I actually have come to like it. I have a question for you. How do you like the Windshield Wiper Sprayers? I know it seems a bit odd, but mine seem weak. I only get two small V-shaped sprays that barely reach halfway up the windshield. I expect a full spray that would cover the windshield. The rear sprayer is also just a single stream, not a full spray. I know it seems an odd question, but it's something that's really becoming a nuisance on Mountain roads. What is your experience with your wiper sprayers?

@@islandextreme17 right? I too have found myself actually liking it as it makes the driving experience so smooth. And to be honest I drove my Q60S yesterday and in every day driving I can’t even tell a difference. I think it’s just a thing that you are supposed to hate CVT no matter how well executed it is in the vehicle! Haha. To your wiper washer question, I do not have a similar experience. The spray on mine is robust. Makes me wonder if something isn’t interfering with your line? Or for whatever reason it’s not pumping as it should. Definitely have it checked out. Especially this time of year! You wanna be safe. Thanks for the feedback!!

The cvt is not bad from a driving experience, but it is questionable in terms of reliability. My Murano with the same cvt died at 44k and i traded it in for an RDX after a $6k repair (dealer can only replace the transmission). I do miss the smoothness of the cvt, but the RDX is a heck of a lot more fun 😊

​@mj8495 If it's under warranty, don't they cover the total repair cost?

Came here to day the same. I originally wanted a Lexus and had the money set aside deciding to buy one. Test drove it before buying, and hated it. Drove the Acura on a whim and fell in love. I didn't drive the Infinity, but I'm also not a fan of Nissan/Infinity build quality and reliability compared to Honda/Acura or Toyota/Lexus.

Motor Trend says the RDX 2.0T is slower than the 2019 QX50 2.0T with it's new engine from the Accord 2.0T is putting out more in the compact SUV. "...The 268-hp crossover recorded a 0-60 mph time of 6.6 seconds and a 15.1-second quarter mile at 91.6 mph. That's a good bit slower than the last 280-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti Sport we tested but slightly quicker than the 272-hp Acura RDX A-Spec." So C&D 6.6 second 0-60 mph was correct on calling it a Bspec or Cspec. Even Consumer Reports's 7.0s 0-60 was also correct. No sub 6-second time for RDX 2.0T..

Well said genuine car performance review.

stop being brainwashed, and Nissan isn't failing.

@@eleyasbtseamlak9102 Nissan has gone from being a winner in the us market to being the worst selling full lineup japanese brand. They have even fallen behind the two Korean brands...so tell me how they aren't failing

@@seanobrien648 they aren't failing because they are still profitable and there are plenty on the roads. success isn't based on who creates the most luxurious models, Nissan is meant to be cheaper, and its not bad for the money.

@@seanobrien648 Nissan cars are still more popular than South Korean. although South Korea has come up, but that's a credit to South Korea not an indictment on Nissan.

@@eleyasbtseamlak9102 they are back in black this year after losing money for years on end

Motor Trend says the RDX 2.0T is slower than the 2019 QX50 2.0T with it's new engine from the Accord 2.0T is putting out more in the compact SUV. "...The 268-hp crossover recorded a 0-60 mph time of 6.6 seconds and a 15.1-second quarter mile at 91.6 mph. That's a good bit slower than the last 280-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti Sport we tested but slightly quicker than the 272-hp Acura RDX A-Spec." So C&D 6.6 second 0-60 mph was correct on calling it a Bspec or Cspec. Even Consumer Reports's 7.0s 0-60 was also correct. No sub 6-second time for RDX 2.0T..

I found I got used to the track pad pretty quickly, but the crap fuel economy… well, that I’ll never get used to. Came from a 2019 BMW X4 that got 33 mpg on the highway where my RDX can barely muster 23! What!!

I had a 08 RDX with the 2.3T+5AT and never saw gas mileage above 21 mpgs. Had a extended test drive of an 19 RDX when it first came out and my mpgs were about the same. The 4 cylinder is just working too hard with sh-awd and hauling around 2 tons (didn't help I live +5000 feet). Ended up going with a 19 MDX hybrid (321hp) and always get 24-26 mpgs and 425-450 miles per tank range.

Motor Trend says the RDX 2.0T is slower than the 2019 QX50 2.0T with it's new engine from the Accord 2.0T is putting out more in the compact SUV. "...The 268-hp crossover recorded a 0-60 mph time of 6.6 seconds and a 15.1-second quarter mile at 91.6 mph. That's a good bit slower than the last 280-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio Ti Sport we tested but slightly quicker than the 272-hp Acura RDX A-Spec." So C&D 6.6 second 0-60 mph was correct on calling it a Bspec or Cspec. Even Consumer Reports's 7.0s 0-60 was also correct. No sub 6-second time for RDX 2.0T..

@@normt430 No Acura or Honda (other than the 2nd gen NSX) have the quickest 0-60 times in their class. They are usually middle of pack at best. Same for braking and mpgs for Honda/Acura. It is the overall sporty package, handling with sh-awd, safety features, and reliability for 150,000 to 200,000 miles that puts an Acura in my garage.

@@mrgold3591 the RDX 2.0T is not any of these. One of the least efficient and costly rear diff fluid change every 30k.

@@normt430 The rear diff is changed at 15,000 miles and then every 30,000-50,000 miles depending on driving habits per system maintenance management software (M.I.D.). It is around $120 at my Acura dealership for rear diff service. Probably around $30-$35 if you like to DYI. I had a 08 RDX and loved the power; but, hated the mpgs. I skipped the +19 RDXs and went for a 19 MDX Sport Hybrid with 321hp, 24-27 mpgs always, and 425-450 miles per 19 gal gas tank.

@@mrgold3591 I followed Honda and Acura longterm reviews where they reported maintenence costs on AWD systems, new transmission in a Pilot from Motor Trend, a whole TLX replaced from Autoblog...Edmund's has the new MDX at 19 mpg!

Go search for Hyundai if you're looking for Genesis video review.

No one gives a shit about Hyundai

The RDX is superior in the engineering department.

Consumer Reports Emergency Lane Change Test, braking from 60 mph. Buick Envision 55.5 mph, 128 ft CX-5(187hp) 54 mph, 133 ft Q5 52.2 mph, 130 ft RDX 52.5, 127 ft X3 53.0 mph, 130 ft Macan 51.5 mph, 130 ft MDX 52.5 mph, 135 ft NX 50 mph, 132 ft QX50 56 mph, 129 ft Stelvio 53 mph, 132 ft C&D has the Envision braking from 70 mph at a segment topping 158 ft. You want to compare Buick to the Acura in reliability? Out of possible 5 Envision- 4 RDX- 1 Q5- 2 X3- 2 Macan- 3 MDX- 4 NX- 5 QX50- 3 Stelvio- 3

@@star999nine And Buick outsold Acura...

I found the RDX seats to be much better than the CX50 or 90.

The RDX A-spec Advance leather is upgraded Milano Leather compared to the Infiniti cheap stuff. Overall the Infiniti interior should be overhauled for the price they’re asking. Cheap plastics and finishes.

@@jonnys_honda Acura's marketing baffles me-- it's ALL about performance and never about luxury. I think Acura does a poor job touting the fact that their cars are luxurious and have nice materials. Lexus is hands down better at marketing their vehicles. My father who is 68 bought a Lexus over an Acura recently simply because of his perception that Lexus was more luxurious and had nicer materials. The "race car" TV ads just don't speak to him. He never considered an Infinti lol.

@@FirstHillSeattle I co-sign this, Acura’s marketing sucks but their products are good

@@drivescene6747 Yup-- 2020 RDX Advance here, black with espresso interior. One of the most comfortable, quiet and fun cars I've ever owned (and the sound system is incredible). I'm not into the A-Spec trim (but I understand why people are)....just wanted a nice, luxurious car that wasn't boring to drive and this fits the bill. Wish they could communicate those other aspects better.

I ended up taking the +19 RDX off my list when I needed to upgrade from my 08 RDX with 2.3T. Fuel economy wasn't that much better in real life driving compared to my 08 RDX (live 5000-7200ft, interstate speeds 75-80 mph). Ended up with a 19 MDX Sport Hybrid and range between 24-27 mpg and 425-450 per 19 gal fuel tank always in the same driving conditions. I wish Acura would bring back the hybrid powertrain for the RDX and MDX.

Have you driven the INFINITI to actually know all the features it has and why it's priced at $60k for the top trim? Instead of drawing a conclusion based on one video review.

@@TheLaw_11 A good amount can be concluded when we compare things the reviewer missed further separating these two vehicles in both price and overall complete package. The Acura’s dynamic/sporty driving experience will sadly not be matched (2022 RDX A-Spec Advance). Torque is delivered on demand but at the same time smoothly with the 10 speed automatic in the RDX, you’ll be waiting for the power with a CVT in the Infiniti. Not to mention the RDX comes with a Torque Vectoring Differential and Adaptive Suspension (comfort, normal, sport) to further enhance the driving experience. Which was surprisingly left out in this review. The technology is matched in the Acura, same type of safety features, with birds eye camera, HUD, lane assist features, also high end speaker setup. Moving on to interior, Acura’s interior finishes are unmatched for the top level trim (at $53k) such as the milano leather, aluminum trim and authentic Alcántara suede accents on seats and door panels. So it comes back to the cost. It’s a tough call paying $60k USD for an inferior interior, cvt trans and a typical suspension system versus $53k for a luxurious sporty ride with the complete package.

@@TheLaw_11 Material quality is one of my main reason if I'm paying $60k+. The Infiniti doesn't deliver well at this price point. The Acura deliver it at a much lower price.

@@jonnys_honda QX55 has 280ib feet of torque, same as the RDX. Whether the torque is in a 10 speed Acura or 1 speed CVT transmissions, the bottom line they're both automatic transmissions( you're not getting any cool points for having 10 speed, it's still an automatic tranny ). I can guarantee you the Acura RDX is no faster than a QX55, quarter mile, half mile etc. You want to talk interior quality ? QX55 is soft touch real leather almost everywhere in the car, not leatherette you find in the RDX . Sound quality, INFINITI uses Bose system. Last time I checked, Bose delivers exceptional sound quality. QX55 has auto leveling and adaptive / cornering lights the RDX doesn't have ( reviewer failed to mention this), which is something Acura doesn't even offer, makes a huge difference. QX55 also has auto high beam assist. You mention safety systems such as lane assist, 360 camera etc...INFINITI and QX55 models have that. Maybe you forgot that INFINITI was actually the first mainstream company to have the 360 camera in their vehicle in 2007 💯 fact and first mainstream car company have a backup camera in their car in 2003 💯 fact. Also the safety features such as lane keep assist, backup collision prevention were actually pioneered by INFINITI another fact 💯. INFINITI will always have an edge over Acura. Even the Q50 Redsport, though I digress has 400 HP, 50 more HP than the Acura TLX Type S...just pointing this out to remind you when it comes to real performance sedans, INFINITI will always have the edge over Acura .

@@hybridstiger cheaper doesn't mean better. There's a reason Acura is lower priced.

Those issues have been resolved for the 2022 refresh.

It usually best to purchase an Acura after they do the mid model refresh (usually after the 4th model year on a 6 to 7 model year run). They get extremely solid with tech/style upgrades and minor fixes from the previous models.

Totally agreed. Infinity is overpricing thier garbage products hoping that someone uneducated get in their dealership and pay MSRP! Thats why they mostly end up having brand new 3 year old models in the lot ready to go half price lol

I got 5.68 0-60

No one is going to be jealous when you roll up in your base Hyundai in a parking lot full of Acura, Infiniti, MB, BMW, Audi, Jags, or even Lincolns.

Time to ditch the two screens also. Hate that.

@@FirstHillSeattle yup that too

@@TheLaw_11 two screens are fine. The bigger issue is the transmission Infiniti chose.

@@TheLaw_11 Ummm, I believe I said I hate two screens, so yes. But I'm also not the center of the universe, so they don't have to do it for me, I just won't buy one of those vehicles. You certainly seem passionate about this!

Funny

I went from a CX-5 to a RDX and everything you appreciate from Mazda is given in ♠️'s with Acura, plus a fast power delivery. You get ZOOM-ZOOM with a BOOM-BOOM.

Facts