trying out the carl zeiss jena sonnar 135 mm f3.5 lens,is it too slow to be any good? join me out there in the real world and lets find out.#vintagelens
Пікірлер: 13
@pdtech45245 күн бұрын
Beautiful photos, I just picked up a mint carl zeiss jena ddr 135mm f3.5 in a case for just £10..😲😳 I'm looking forward to using it on my old m42 screw mount slr film cameras and with an adapter on my Lumix g3 m4/3 mirrorless system.
@fistfulloflenses5 күн бұрын
Great, the bargains are still there to be found, I still shoot film occasionally, I've got a roll to develop at the moment, thanks for the comment
@perin99Ай бұрын
Another great video!!
@fistfulloflensesАй бұрын
Thank you, I'm glad you're still enjoying the channel, makes the effort worthwhile 👍
@Rev_RhysАй бұрын
Love the video!
@fistfulloflensesАй бұрын
Thanks Rhys, good to hear from you and glad you enjoyed it 👍
@christopherleecowanАй бұрын
It's hard to go wrong with a good vintage 135 mm
@fistfulloflensesАй бұрын
@@christopherleecowan very true, they always seem to be pretty good, it was such a popular focal length for so long, the manufacturers had plenty of experience producing great 135s
@cameraprepper793824 күн бұрын
Aperture 3.5 for a 135mm Lens are alright !
@fistfulloflenses24 күн бұрын
@@cameraprepper7938 yes I agree, because of the focal length you still get quite a bit of background blur, at f 3.5
@photographyforenjoymentАй бұрын
Nice one Karl! Honest answer? I couldn't tell you which image was shot on the different bodies. Perhaps the same shot taken at more or less the same time with each camera would be conclusive, but there again does it really matter when the results are that good?
@fistfulloflensesАй бұрын
@@photographyforenjoyment thank you Alan, good to hear from you,I've thought about doing comparison shots , but feel it could get a little bit tedious. Glad you're enjoying the channel.
@fistfulloflensesАй бұрын
I think it also shows that sensor size is not that important, and as you said it's the end results that matter