De-stacking conveyor system for can lids. Inspection equipment not installed yet.Product is removed from sleeves and later returned to their sleeves. www.caseautomation.com
Пікірлер: 41
@qaiserfarooq6372 жыл бұрын
Most beautiful working machine 👍
@vasonsiratanapanta84552 жыл бұрын
ร่น่ร่,รช่
@Bianchi772 жыл бұрын
Nice video,thanks :)
@lucianoarcelo2 жыл бұрын
this is music and gives better symphony 👏👏👏👏
@cangzhouqijinghardwareacce68502 жыл бұрын
very impressive
@RameshKumar-mt8jg2 жыл бұрын
Nice automation
@raphaelmahumane16482 жыл бұрын
Great project, how does the last part pick up the lids and stack them on the upper conveyor. Its not clear please explain the technology there......
@aan53932 жыл бұрын
Magnet
@raphaelmahumane16482 жыл бұрын
@@aan5393 Thanks. So it is round or in form of a wheel there?
@andrewyates55482 жыл бұрын
@@raphaelmahumane1648 yes the inside is a rounded profile for good surface contact with the discs so they stay parallel to the radius of the wheel, or close enough to it.
@raphaelmahumane16482 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 Thank you. This is an interesting piece of technology, especially the magnet component!!!! If we were to remove the magnet component, do you think there can be something else to serve the same purpose excluding magnet?
@fifaham3 жыл бұрын
Very nice - who made this machine? What is the location of the manufacturer?
@rajaramvishwakarma92342 жыл бұрын
Ji
@ghouadnimohamed66992 жыл бұрын
السعر
@fifaham2 жыл бұрын
@@ghouadnimohamed6699 بليرة و نص - تشتريها ؟ هههه
@donnielsen1253 Жыл бұрын
Case Automation Corp in Corona CA USA
@stephenrider50452 жыл бұрын
So what is the point of the operation?
@morinawaindonesia2 жыл бұрын
Good
@alainfiguiere73312 жыл бұрын
Je ne comprends pas le rôle de cette machine. Les couvercles sont empilés dans 2 cylindres. Ils sont dépilés, pour aller sur un convoyeur qui va les ré-empiler. Il y avait qu'a les prendre tous déjà empilés !?
@williamhuang53292 жыл бұрын
Hanzhen harmonic drive gear , robot arm gear reducer
@mestrysmitesh3 жыл бұрын
What will be the cost of this . 👍
@QwertyCanada3 жыл бұрын
2grand
@aan53932 жыл бұрын
@@QwertyCanada great price for such a neat machine
@AYUSHJOD6782 жыл бұрын
🚨
@raghibbustami19152 жыл бұрын
Noise level is to much high difficult for worker .
@raphaelmahumane16482 жыл бұрын
they will have to wear ear plugs...lol sorry man.
@yagmedical412 жыл бұрын
interested please send me a quote
@markmerrill59762 жыл бұрын
80/20...that will be falling apart regularly.
@donnielsen1253 Жыл бұрын
We have used A lex profile system for over 25 years. Nothing has fallen apart yet
@TechPrune2 жыл бұрын
Automation machine
@twestgard22 жыл бұрын
Imagine you had inspection/quality control problems, so instead of addressing the problems at their source, you invested the money to buy packages of unreliable material, transport that to a different location, and then the time and expense to build a complex machine to unwrap, de-stack, convey, inspect, restack, and repackage. Is this an incredibly stupid engineer or an engineer who has a terrible boss?
@andrewyates55482 жыл бұрын
Yes, if a consistent defect showed up they would find the cause and correct it. This machine is intended to make it easy and fast to inspect every single part that comes off the production line, not just the the ones in the batches that are flagged due to defects, ALL of them.
@twestgard22 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 I get that every part needs to be inspected and up to spec, but it’s still wildly inefficient to do it this way. Do the inspection where they are made and you avoid any need for this whole mess. A complicated, expensive, extra machine that you have to pay someone to operate and for that matter it takes up space and requires maintenance and training. It’s just so simple and obvious to correct the underlying problem that is effectively ballooning into the existence of this machine. To put it another way, if your supplier can’t deliver reliable product in spec, you try to get the supplier to fix it, or you switch to a different supplier who can produce adequate quality, or you make the part in house. There’s no scenario where you let your production line include jank scab machines that paper over a manufacturing defect higher in the chain. Not with all the wasted money of packaging and shipping.
@andrewyates55482 жыл бұрын
@@twestgard2 You've obviously never seen sheet metal punch machines. They make about 500-1000 parts/min for small parts like that. You think you can effectively inspect parts that fast be my guest but normal humans can't. They split the production into multiples of these unstackers so that they are moving slowly enough to actually look at them.
@twestgard22 жыл бұрын
@@andrewyates5548 I take your point with that, but the inspection is being done somewhere, sometime, by someone, so that’s the same. There’s still an extra stacking/de stacking step in here that could be eliminated by having an adequate inspection system the first time the parts are in a conveyor belt system.
@andrewyates55482 жыл бұрын
@@twestgard2 They come out of the machine in stacks, not on a conveyor belt. I totally understand your intention to make things more efficient, I'm the same way, but because of the way the punch machines works it just wouldn't make sense to remove them with a belt.