I used this strategy today and did well. There were a lot of short rolls but the DC hedge saved me until a few long rolls came out. I modified it a little by going 70 across (64 for me and 6 for the crew) with a 75 DC bet. I added to the crew's bets with any change and they were very happy. The pit boss approached me later while I was at the Pai Gow table and told me he liked my betting strategy, a compliment to you, David. Thank you for this video and all of your others.

The one thing u forgot to mention is that u lose with 11 as well on the DC. I usually place a $5 yo to protect me

no betting strat will work (to reduce the house edge), at any of these games Each and every bet you can make has a house edge. Combining different bets does not somehow magically change that fact. Lol! One bet is not somehow "insured" by another bet. You have a Very simply, lets say you bet 5 on the pass and 5 on the dont. The pass will lose 1.4141...%, and the dont will lose 1.36363...% over the long term., One does not insure the other in any way. Fact is, you have made it impossible that you could ever come up with a winning day, while you are certainly going to lose over the long term All you do with these strats in make your mind such a clusterf**k, employing a clusterf**k of bets, that your poor mind persuades you that you have achieved something. If these strats worked, craps would not be delt by any casino. You are living in a fantasyland. The only working strat is to ONLY play the best bets, to reduce the house edge to the minimum -- and you will certainly lose over the long term. (And you certainly arent doing that). Doing what you are doing is paying the casino many multiples of what you would be paying if you would just put your money on one of the lines, and maximizing odds bet before making further bets. That will give a HE of only about 0.3%. You have a HE of at least 10 times that amount with your strat. And casinos love you! You have a huge problem visualizing what is going on here. Certainly you did poorly at things like maths and statistics

Instead of placing a $50 DC BET WHY NOT JUST LAY #4 OR #10 since these 2 numbers can only be made 3 ways versus a 5 6 8 or 9 being rolled??

@@lomanolomano Because, as you would realize if you could do simple maths, laying the 4/10 obviously has a house edge of 3.846%. Where that DC bet obviously has a house edge of 1.3636%. (Notice how the DC has a MUCH smaller house edge. About 65% less) The fact is, if the point becomes a 6 or 8 it is still easier to roll a 7. So you will still have the edge if the puck is on that number.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p7mjeLtoxNebpYU.html the power of the darkside lets go!

David is zukerberging you via crapsee

News flash! NO betting strat works

Good thing they don’t get to decide how you play

What if your 3 rolls are 2,11,12

Played $5 Craps at The Grand downtown every night in January 2024. Perfectly fine safe place one block off Fremont. Fun dealers.

They do counter it, by being open! Hit a few point 7s in a row and you’re down $300 or more before you can get one drink!!

@@davetesta2797 and the house can change the rules any time they want.

The house does not care about what betting strat you use, because they know that no betting strat can work at all. Only mathematically/statistically illiterate people can believe these strats work The casino can just relax and rake in the money.

The casino counter acted this strategy: as you keep playing and pressing an under cover sharp shooter who works for the casino throws a perfect 7 🤣

Yep, same here, that number may hit four times in row, and you pulled the money off, that's what I didn't like about this strategy, some numbers" trend" for 4,5,6, times out of ten rolls, I wanna be on it, if it does!

You made David day - Dennis

Thank you for watching! --Mar

No it hasnt. These betting strats do nothing to diminish house edge. House edge means the casino wins on your action. Since the casino wins, you lose. If these systems worked, the casino would not offer the game.

I do love your videos and will probably keep watching even if i don’t download the casino app again lol

Guy could have easily got knocked out by a decent shooter too though! It’s a risk either way.

@@davetesta2797 There is nothing like a "decent shooter". It is all random

7 has like a 14% of rolling. So statistically it should land ~1/7 rolls

I am trying to learn craps and this sounds interesting. I have played a few times. So this would call for a 90 on each 6 and 8

@@javiertamez9291 yeah 90 would win u 105 but download a demo game in try it first before u go play in learn dice control

@@calebcrenshaw8529 cool, gonna have to try it

Sounds like a good way to have a bad night very quickly. But I’m more of a grind strategist with a walk away number

@@chrisis1 heading to Louisiana tomorrow to hit the craps table. What strategy do u usually play

The odds don't change just because a number is hitting more. There is still a certain percent chance that number hits. It's just luck if a number hits multiple times.

@@heids2440 Any and all outcomes are not luck, they are the reality of what has actually occurred. You can call it luck, but that usually means you just watched it happen and didn't bet on it. What you call odds and chance is probability, which is the expectation over the long-term. Casinos would go broke if the short-term results always followed long-term probability, since outcomes would be easily predictable.

@@ahbalone confused, did you not just prove your initial comment wrong then? the odds for rolling a 10 are 8.33%, even if a 10 has rolled 5 times in a row the odds remain the same. doing a “reverse cliffhanger” strategy when numbers roll consecutively is counterintuitive as the odds remain the same.

@@ahbalone saying someone should have placed “x” bet because the number hit repeatedly is results oriented.

@@emphatically Uh huh

Thank you sir. Humbled. - David

Just add a green (on the don't)for each red. $32 for $5, $64 for $10, $96 for $15 table. Sure, you only have a $75 don't bet to cover $96, but better to lose a little for something that won't occur too often.

Or you could bet the pass/come with 10x odds for a house edge of 0.18%

Nonsense. You failed at maths, didnt you? The 4 and 10 have a vig of 6.67% The 5 and 9 have a vig of 4.00% The 6 and 8 have a vig of 1.51% I think even you could see that a combination of those bets cannot equal 1.25% Fact is, if your whole game was the 6/8, it would have a vig of 1.51%. Depending upon what you do about pressing bets, etc, the house edge will be from roughly 3 to 4% There are worse bets, but place bets are not good bets Obviosly as far as table games, a 3% house edge is hideous Go play this way. Keep real honest win/loss records. It wont take many months to realize that you are going to lose big employing any of these betting strats

No. You must have a Line bet (either side) in order to shoot. You can pick up your bet and walk though, then the dice go to the next shooter. Fire bets stay active.

But also, the world is full of mathematically illiterate people who cannot visualize that simple obvious fact. Casinos depend on these to make their billions

Uh Oh, will happen, made an even bigger one, sadly. The big sell is the strategy :)

You have it on the DC because you want a placebet to hit as the dc goes behind the number so you can start your first cliff hanger from go. You could turn on all your bet and do a DP but that goes against David's rule of following the shooter - Dennis

Play the field and sleep in the field