Thanks for your comment. I believe a portion of our preference is based on subjective taste, which is different per individual. So the round vs. octagonal shape may be a matter of individual preference, but do you think the dial, handset, and indexes are of higher quality on the b2000? Thanks again for the engagement!

@tangar-jz3xd of course, you may disagree as much as you like. My argument is that the build quality is better on the B1000 compared to the other two. These are steel g-shocks, so ruggedness and robustness should be expected. But within that rugedness, out of the 3, the B1000 and B2000 have stronger built bracelets, and the detail work on the dial is more demanding on the B1000 and B2000. The b3000 is the least decorated and detailed, plain dial and indexes. So I am not claiming anything in regard to taste, that is entirely subjective. But in terms of quality and workmanship required, the ranking is 1. B1000, 2. B2000, AND 3. B3000. Please keep in mind videos and photos do not do these watches justice. The difference in quality is way more visible when actually holding the watches and inspecting them in hand. What I am trying to say with this review is that I am disappointed to see my favorite brand decline in quality and design rather than improving on their next generations of watches. Thank you for taking the time to engage

​@@wismods you are welcome, nonetheless; for those who are going to chose to buy one of the I still strongly say that the three models are build with the same mechinary and technic as equel in case and dial finishing. if anything the bracelet for B3000 feels moere fitting to its case design. for those how have sharp sight I would say some colour like gold on the dial secially on the small hands would feel and look of a cheaper quality in compare with other color like red, white or black. that is my exprience. it defer from one person to other.