Cathode Rays Lead to Thomson's Model of the Atom

  Рет қаралды 530,795

Veritasium

Veritasium

13 жыл бұрын

In the mid 1800's scientists successfully passed an electric current through a vacuum in a glass tube. They saw a glow from the tube that seemed to emanate from the negatively charged plate called the cathode. Since scientists didn't know what the glow was they called it a cathode ray. There was debate over whether the cathode ray was a wave phenomenon like light or a stream of negatively charged particles. JJ Thomson effectively resolved the debate in 1897 by performing a clever experiment that determined the charge to mass ratio of the particles making up the cathode ray. He also showed that this same particle was in all different cathode materials so it must be a constituent common to all atoms. This changed our understanding of the atom from the previous billiard ball model to Thomson's plum pudding model of the atom.

Пікірлер: 279
@ToddHowardWithAGun
@ToddHowardWithAGun 12 жыл бұрын
"What's an electron?" "Well, think of it as a plum pudding..."
@justyourregularboyscout9613
@justyourregularboyscout9613 4 жыл бұрын
LMAOOO
@arya_aryan
@arya_aryan 4 жыл бұрын
Atom as a plum pudding, electron as a plum
@Uranium-dx7nn
@Uranium-dx7nn 3 жыл бұрын
Thomson told think of an atom as a plum pudding not the electron.
@jeytube970
@jeytube970 2 жыл бұрын
Watermelon and Christmas pudding, in our book
@ender3801
@ender3801 2 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@banhisikhadebnath9915
@banhisikhadebnath9915 3 жыл бұрын
9 yrs passed and this was the 1st video of yours that I saw
@douglasstrother6584
@douglasstrother6584 13 күн бұрын
"Electromagnetic Fields and Waves" by Lorrain & Corson (2nd Edition) contains a problem in chapter 2 "Electrostatic Fields in a Vacuum" (2-19) on J.J. Thomson's "Plum Pudding" model of the atom. It asks to (A) find the force on an electron; (B) describe its motion; (C) the frequency for a 1 Angstrom-sized atom; and (D) compare this frequency to that of visible light. A rather thought-provoking question in an Undergraduate E&M textbook!
@ayushjaiswal.
@ayushjaiswal. 3 жыл бұрын
1:50 Derek listening like a serious student
@pauleohl
@pauleohl 2 жыл бұрын
What we see here raises more questions than it answers. I was looking for a ray and I see rising doughnuts of purple light. Also, do the electrons that were pulled off the cathode return? If so, how and when do they return? If not, where do they go?
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
There's an anode at the other end - that's where they go to. They speed up slowly until they have enough kinetic energy to knock an air molecule (mostly nitrogen) up to a higher energy level. These molecules then drop back to the ground state and emit light. In the mean time the electron's lost all its energy and has to start accelerating again. Hence the breaks in the illumination
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
eventually the electrons get to the anode, and head around the circuit to do it all again... unless they hook up with another nitrogen or oxygen positive ion and live happily ever after
@winproduction7585
@winproduction7585 Жыл бұрын
@@PhilUpOnScience I have a question if the electron have to start accelerate again then why it gives the break in illumination. why all the electrons do not hit the first nitrogen molecule near cathoide? you get what I mean?
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience Жыл бұрын
@@winproduction7585 They lose their energy in the first collision (which lights up the gas). They don't cause any more illumination until they have again amassed enough energy to knock a molecule up to its first excited state.
@FadkinsDiet
@FadkinsDiet 10 ай бұрын
I thought this was a vacuum tube. So there shouldn't be any nitrogen or any other air molecule in there, right?
@crane8035
@crane8035 2 жыл бұрын
How he says ‘laindmaak’ 00:16 (land mark) is the most Australian thing ever
@cabelodomato
@cabelodomato 2 жыл бұрын
I am loving to watch your old KZfaq videos. And do you know what? I just thought that it may be possible to start to present those videos to my 8 years old girl. They are shorter and simpler to understand. Perfect for kids! Thank you very much for making such nice videos over the years.
@JL-yg3ku
@JL-yg3ku 8 жыл бұрын
1:58 that looks like a shark.
@tronmend219
@tronmend219 5 жыл бұрын
At first I thought you were talking about the dudes hair Ha!
@maxpercer7119
@maxpercer7119 3 жыл бұрын
i wish they would explain how the electron produces the light, like a schematic from the cathode to the anode
@evank3718
@evank3718 3 жыл бұрын
Light, or photons, are emitted from atoms when an electron gets closer to the positive nucleus of an atom. Hope that helped
@amanthakur7582
@amanthakur7582 3 жыл бұрын
When High Voltage is passed through electron it excites and goes to unstable level. Then it comes back to a stable level and emits photon(light)
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
They speed up slowly until they have enough kinetic energy to knock an air molecule (mostly nitrogen) up to a higher energy level. These molecules then drop back to the ground state and emit light. In the mean time the electron's lost all its energy and has to start accelerating again. Hence the breaks in the illumination = "striations"
@patriciahugman5285
@patriciahugman5285 2 жыл бұрын
@@PhilUpOnScience the cathode ray is produced in a vacuum - there are no gas particles
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
@@patriciahugman5285 It has been pumped down, but not completely. Even in outer space, a vacuum way better than what we can achieve on earth, there are still roughly one particle per cubic centimetre. As the vacuum improves, the dark space and the striations get further apart, as there are fewer particles to collide with.
@ElVerdaderoAbejorro
@ElVerdaderoAbejorro Жыл бұрын
This raises so many questions: 1) If they were expecting to see "nothing or a spark", how come they saw they "saw the same glow no matter what metal they did the experiment"? 2) How on earth did they measure the size of this particle to conclude it is smaller than an atom? 3) When does this particle (electron) become a photon and how does that conversion work?
@andrewthomas310
@andrewthomas310 9 ай бұрын
1) well the first guy expected to see nothing/a spark, once he got this glowy contraption, every other guy wanted to do the same test and subsequently the tests concluded there's this "glow, no matter what metal they used" 2) until then, we thought every element breaks down to its fundamental particle "the atom" which couldn't be broken down to smaller particles. Then they saw this glow and theorized there has to be some tiny _particle_ traveling from the *intact* cathode to the intact anode.. suppose the cathode atoms were travelling through the medium, it'd disintegrate the cathode and accumulate on the anode (like electroplating). An intact cathode meant whatever the particle, was given off by the cathode atoms and travelled through the anode atoms to complete the circuit. And all metals tested had this particle, so a flowing current meant this particle has to be moving through them.
@andrewthomas310
@andrewthomas310 9 ай бұрын
3) it doesn't *become* a photon, one of the loose electron accelerating under the electric field, hits an atom wandering in the vacuum, which imparts it's kinetic energy to a native electron in the atom, such that the native electron of the atom gets excited and jumps to a higher orbit/energy state, (but sans enough energy to rip the native electron out from the atom) which isn't a stable setup/equilibrium) for the atom, Losing its potential energy to settle back to its orbit, the electron pulses out a photon, which in this case is in the visible spectrum. Suppose the air had more of another element than nitrogen, say -calcium vapor or xenon, the electrons that get excited to (the outer orbit electron) jump to a higher orbital, would release a calcium specific color(brick red, I guess)/xenon specific color(dim blue grey) and this can be used to analyse what element constitutes the said gas. Sodium gives bright yellow when its outer electron gets excited.. This also means sodium vapor absords yellow colored radiation best, such that it's electron gets that specific energy to reach that specific orbit.. Same behind JWST analysing the presence of certain gases in distant planets.. All answers are recollection of memory from highschool classes and my guesswork. I'm neither a physics/chem major nor a native English speaker. Kindly excuse and feel free to correct.
@dipteeshukla7
@dipteeshukla7 8 ай бұрын
1) the negatively charged particles (electrons as we know now) hit the ZnS screen or any other fluorescent material to produce the glow. they also cause the ionization of gases in their path. since all electrons are same, they cause the same glow which led to the conclusion that these negatively charged particles are fundamental quantities of every atom. :) I'm still a student, so I am not very sure about the answers to 2) and 3). Hope this helps. Please correct me if I'm wrong. :)
@andrewthomas310
@andrewthomas310 7 ай бұрын
@@dipteeshukla7 i think you're referring to the gold foil experiment, where a beam of alpha-particles scattered by a thin gold foil, was picked up with the Zn sulphur screen. I'm not sure electrons can be picked up on ZnS screen, also, the glow in this video is seen in vacuum and not on any screen detector.
@dipteeshukla7
@dipteeshukla7 7 ай бұрын
@@andrewthomas310 but we'll require something to observe them as cathode rays are invisble...
@bhatts18
@bhatts18 3 жыл бұрын
Watching this 10 years after it was originally posted!
@Azhar-rt9tw
@Azhar-rt9tw 3 жыл бұрын
🤝
@dougk102
@dougk102 10 жыл бұрын
1:50 distracted by the vac pump. It looks like a shark! Lol
@ashutronomy3448
@ashutronomy3448 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty old comment
@maruftim
@maruftim 2 жыл бұрын
@@ashutronomy3448 old indeed
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 5 ай бұрын
Actually the brand was Shark 🙂@@maruftim
@maruftim
@maruftim 5 ай бұрын
@@PhilUpOnScience umm okay?
@saigipson1546
@saigipson1546 2 жыл бұрын
This title is anti-clickbate
@laimiskleinauskas3654
@laimiskleinauskas3654 10 жыл бұрын
it reminds me experiment of thermoemission in physics lab. like the force they were talking was a heat emitted because of R of the cathode.
@JonandAlly725
@JonandAlly725 12 жыл бұрын
P.s. Love your videos and don't think u try to make ppl look stupid (and never watched the full interviews)! And love the point about "unknowledgeable" vs. unintelligent.
@InvertedWingback
@InvertedWingback 10 ай бұрын
This guy might become a great channel a decade later
@IIT__2024
@IIT__2024 10 ай бұрын
Sarcasm😏😏
@abhinavmartandjha0369
@abhinavmartandjha0369 Ай бұрын
​@@IIT__2024are you in any iit?
@IIT__2024
@IIT__2024 Ай бұрын
@@abhinavmartandjha0369 nope
@winneriruke9104
@winneriruke9104 6 жыл бұрын
This was helpful I wish I can study in your university
@phaldaz
@phaldaz 13 жыл бұрын
thanks, helped a lot! :)
@mashburger
@mashburger 12 жыл бұрын
your video is a life saver thanks very much. kinda got a write a paper on this tonight :/
@sparklypri
@sparklypri 3 жыл бұрын
what happened to the paper ? :D
@henil0604
@henil0604 2 жыл бұрын
@@sparklypri lol
@6kbps
@6kbps 2 жыл бұрын
hope you did well
@shivaranjanigr4750
@shivaranjanigr4750 2 жыл бұрын
Wow! This is such a great youtube channel!!!! I am a student and if only my teachers made chemistry this interesting!!
@jayizzett
@jayizzett 2 жыл бұрын
Ever wonder why they don’t just show us an electron or atom but always want to explain it
@shivaranjanigr4750
@shivaranjanigr4750 2 жыл бұрын
@@jayizzett 😂😂 yup.
@jayizzett
@jayizzett 2 жыл бұрын
@@shivaranjanigr4750 it’s all theory … :-/
@shivaranjanigr4750
@shivaranjanigr4750 2 жыл бұрын
@@jayizzett what election 😂
@jayizzett
@jayizzett 2 жыл бұрын
@@shivaranjanigr4750 electron. Thank you
@txn_razz6464
@txn_razz6464 3 жыл бұрын
any one else watching this because they have too
@snuffy4992
@snuffy4992 3 жыл бұрын
Go play fortnite
@jasonspades5628
@jasonspades5628 3 жыл бұрын
why wouldnt you want to watch this? embrace school. you have no idea how much you will miss it
@mydecembermydecember
@mydecembermydecember 12 жыл бұрын
GUYS, LOOK OUT! THERE'S A SHARK ON THE TABLE!
@eddieoneil117
@eddieoneil117 Ай бұрын
Seeing young Veritasium is something veryy delightable
@viktorlindberg1462
@viktorlindberg1462 11 жыл бұрын
And to tie this to the pudding synonym, there might be a dwarf around putting more plums in as you take them out.
@crkreads
@crkreads 4 жыл бұрын
Experiment first conducted in 1857 ...wow some really intelligent people that time.
@MicahEZ
@MicahEZ 6 жыл бұрын
cool experiment
@minor_edit
@minor_edit 11 жыл бұрын
Australia. If you like the waves you're bound to encounter a shark eventually.
@sahejpratapsingh8828
@sahejpratapsingh8828 3 жыл бұрын
He has changed so much but i really want to talk to him..... love his vedios
@SSNewberry
@SSNewberry 4 ай бұрын
Thomson was relentless in his pursuit
@sushicartman01
@sushicartman01 12 жыл бұрын
Why does the "solid-appearing" ray look like it changes into a bunch of slow-moving purple blobs?
@daifukuu
@daifukuu 2 жыл бұрын
did you find out?
@sushicartman01
@sushicartman01 2 жыл бұрын
@@daifukuu Read a different comment about camera frame rate making it look like discrete blobs but your eyes would perceive it as continuous. Haven't confirmed but it sounds reasonable
@JKRK9706
@JKRK9706 8 ай бұрын
Good job 👏👏👏
@andreandes7485
@andreandes7485 6 ай бұрын
Loved that ending perfect preparation of nuclear chemistry.
@Alfalfa88888
@Alfalfa88888 11 жыл бұрын
is this how a neon lamp works?
@Happy-vw2ls
@Happy-vw2ls Жыл бұрын
I’m gonna apply a high voltage to my plum pudding to see if any plums come out
@LRFLEW
@LRFLEW 12 жыл бұрын
"One thought it was waves, and another thought it was particles." Funny how both turned out to be right :P
@Mikeb8134
@Mikeb8134 6 жыл бұрын
Analogies are great but care should be expressed when they help "imagine" what's going on vs. replicate the mechanism of action. Which makes food analogies great as they are self-evident for imagination purposes only!
@williamogilvie6909
@williamogilvie6909 9 ай бұрын
Very good! Now can I have some pudding?
@Himanshu-wg3ib
@Himanshu-wg3ib 3 жыл бұрын
Loved it , just loved it ,😍
@wondroustransition1622
@wondroustransition1622 2 жыл бұрын
What happens after you turn the power off though? ... I mean during the experiment all the electrons are "sucked out" of the cathode if I understood that right? What remains? Will the cathode be forever positively charged after we cut the power? Or how do the electrons get back to the cathode? Where do the electrons go during the experiment? Will they just stick to the anode and remain there as long as there is power?
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
for every electron that comes off the cathode, one goes into the anode, so it balances up. This is because the anode and cathode are connected through the power supply. (There are ways you can charge up a cathode and leave it charged though - eventually the electrons get bumped by passing air molecules, taken away, knocked off etc and so the charge dissipates)
@gabrielhacecosas
@gabrielhacecosas 6 жыл бұрын
Why can't you see a continuous "spark"? is not an effect of the camera, I've done that experiment with a flybak, a bottle of wine and a fridge pump and you can see the spark discontinuously. Is it because the high voltage is not continuous but pulsating?
@LRFLEW
@LRFLEW 11 жыл бұрын
When I said electrons were waves, I was referring to the double-slit experiment and quantum mechanics.
@firerevenge
@firerevenge 11 жыл бұрын
Is the setup you made basically the same as an X-ray tube? if so, weren't you exposed to x-rays when you started the machine?
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 6 ай бұрын
Yeah, probably there were a few. Not sure if our voltage was high enough, but the current was low enough to make sure if there were any it was not a large number of them
@mahalia9153
@mahalia9153 4 ай бұрын
What gave Geissler the idea for this particular experiment in the first place? What was his hypothesis
@fcoalvaradov
@fcoalvaradov 12 жыл бұрын
@MrStemkilla yeah this reminds me also of my radiology class :D
@horus2779
@horus2779 3 жыл бұрын
I was distracted by the Orb stuck to the outside of the tube once it was turned on, what is that, is it the Moon.
@RowanAmeth
@RowanAmeth 12 жыл бұрын
@sushicartman01 My guess is the frame rate of the camera. Kinda like how if you watch a video of a car driving down the road, the wheels can appear stationary.
@ajeeshkottekad3179
@ajeeshkottekad3179 3 жыл бұрын
good video
@sidewaysfcs0718
@sidewaysfcs0718 11 жыл бұрын
electricity in quantum theory is the electromagnetic wave that travels between electrons , creating current, that's why the speed of current in a cable is close to the speed of light, while the drift velocity of electrons is much slower , and analogous view is that this electromagnetic wave is just photons being transferred between electrons. particles are waves, and waves are particles.
@RealSquidicus
@RealSquidicus 11 жыл бұрын
DANGER! DANGER! 0:28
@jasonmichaelgonzalez3875
@jasonmichaelgonzalez3875 2 ай бұрын
The wave and the particle....a vortex of electromagnetic potential and the substrate of "physical reality", where energy manifests into matter.
@Eshwar_nigga
@Eshwar_nigga 2 жыл бұрын
Plum pudding but plum as -ve and remaining +ve so great
@sherazkhan2802
@sherazkhan2802 7 жыл бұрын
Why is there no glow when the pressure is higher in the discharge tube? and why does the glow again disappear after lowering the pressure below a certain value? It would be great if someone explain it to me , please.
@sciencehour9476
@sciencehour9476 7 жыл бұрын
When there is air inside the tube, the molecules of the air would absorb the energy released by electrons. And so there will be no glow. When there is no air, there is no one to absorb the energy and so the electrons can be seen releasing the excess energy(cathode rays).
@sherazkhan2802
@sherazkhan2802 7 жыл бұрын
science hour But cathode rays are what we call the electrons . They are the one and the same thing .
@MuitaMerdaAoVivo
@MuitaMerdaAoVivo 7 жыл бұрын
What makes the glow is the electrons from the gas molecules being excited by the energy of the electron ray (cathode ray). What you see isn't the cathode ray itself, but it's effect on a few gas molecules. If you take away the gas, the cathode ray wil still be there, but you won't be able to see it.
@sherazkhan2802
@sherazkhan2802 7 жыл бұрын
+Daniel Spesani If this is the case then why can't we observe the glow even at a higher pressure (more gas molecules) ? The same occurs when the pressure is considerably low .
@MuitaMerdaAoVivo
@MuitaMerdaAoVivo 7 жыл бұрын
Because if the concentration of molecules is big, the energy will be divided among many atoms, thus the energy in each individual atom won't be enough to excite the electrons. Try to imagine that you want to boil some water, but your power source can only give 500 watts. If you put it in a cup of water, it will boil without problem, but if you put it in a lake, the energy won't be enough to boil that much water.
@shorifulhaque5137
@shorifulhaque5137 4 жыл бұрын
Is that a stationary wave? Does that explain the 'sections' you can see?
@rickthebas
@rickthebas 3 жыл бұрын
No that's probably just an effect given by the camera only being a certain amount of frames per second. If you looked at it live you would see a continuous line
@SuperBiepbiep
@SuperBiepbiep 12 жыл бұрын
i think it wil finaly run out of negatively charged particles but there are so many of them that it takes a huge amount of time. not sure though
@mohitmathur908
@mohitmathur908 Жыл бұрын
What is the speed of electrons in cathode rays?
@user-jr9tx9sy1m
@user-jr9tx9sy1m 4 ай бұрын
Consistency pays...
@Haas.
@Haas. 5 жыл бұрын
The most recent comment on this was from 2 years ago
@solobiker18
@solobiker18 5 жыл бұрын
This was on my home page, soo why not watch it.
@soundaryajois82
@soundaryajois82 5 жыл бұрын
* one year ago actually...
@trailseeker7448
@trailseeker7448 4 жыл бұрын
No 5 months
@0zero0360
@0zero0360 12 жыл бұрын
Good eye balls!
@mohammadabdussobhan7652
@mohammadabdussobhan7652 14 күн бұрын
Jazakallah
@maxmccafferty6713
@maxmccafferty6713 7 жыл бұрын
this also marked the beginning of x-rays right? lol I don't know. but man, crts were a quantum leap
@JonandAlly725
@JonandAlly725 12 жыл бұрын
how is it that the cathode doesn't run out of this negatively charged particles? After all, you can only pull so many plums out of a pudding :P - Just Jon
@laavanyarajan4444
@laavanyarajan4444 3 жыл бұрын
Because a constant voltage is supplied...
@Motivation-mastermind-
@Motivation-mastermind- 5 ай бұрын
How the uniform dark spaces produced can you explain
@gyshalom
@gyshalom 7 жыл бұрын
But what is causing the light? Collision with gas particles?
@PvPigCreations
@PvPigCreations 9 жыл бұрын
another greek word: anode -> άνοδος (ανω + οδος ~(up + road))
@jaredbocca
@jaredbocca 12 жыл бұрын
no condescending wonka= no learning
@sameerUNO10100
@sameerUNO10100 2 жыл бұрын
how much is the vacuum in glass tube?
@broli123
@broli123 6 жыл бұрын
At that voltage that's a good way to expose yourself to quite a bit of X-rays!
@viktorlindberg1462
@viktorlindberg1462 11 жыл бұрын
Well, the electrons are coming from your power supply, if they stop generating them they will stop flowing. There will always be electrons in the metal, but they are bound to the protons. From your question it sounds like you thought that the particle was something other than an electron. But that was the point of this experiment, to prove the existence of the electron.
@ZachMacLurg
@ZachMacLurg 11 жыл бұрын
You didn't put a magnet up to it to prove the negative charge of the electrons!
@laurentchouinard118
@laurentchouinard118 3 ай бұрын
Les électrons sont les raisins secs de l'atome!
@ashishparihar143
@ashishparihar143 9 жыл бұрын
can u make a video on .."Which way does Electricity REALLY flow?" Electricity flows bcoz of negatively charged electrons? but when we connect a bulb to a battery ...both +ve and -ve charge-flow goes in two opposite directions at the same time. and what happens when a human body get electrocuted??
@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322
@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322 8 жыл бұрын
+Ashish Parihar When electricity was discovered, they had to decide on a notation, so they decided on + for the anode and - for the cathode. Later on we discovered that electrons were the reason that electricity, flowed, and it was flowing differently than we expected. Electricians still use the "conventional" (i.e. incorrect) notation of + for anode and - for cathode, even though it's not really accurate. When you connect a bulb to a battery, it flows from - to +. This is DC (direct current). When you connect a bulb to the wall, the + and - are switching constantly (60 times a second in the US and 50 times a second elsewhere). This is called AC (alternating current). Your body has a capacitance, which means if you put electricity through it, it will charge up and electricity will start to be blocked. This is why batteries, even really big batteries, don't hurt you when you touch them. Since the AC power from the wall is constantly going back and forth, it charges and discharges capacitors (like your body) very fast, and it can have a greater effect. Ultimately, it's the electricity that tenses up the wrong muscles (like your heart) that causes problems. Hope this answers some of your questions.
@PurEvil10
@PurEvil10 4 жыл бұрын
@@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322 well explained
@pjj390
@pjj390 2 жыл бұрын
@@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322 very well explained
@jake_runs_the_world
@jake_runs_the_world 3 жыл бұрын
bro is that Glenn McGrath
@fractalnomics
@fractalnomics 3 жыл бұрын
Is the electron discharge a form of radiation (of electrons)?
@PhilUpOnScience
@PhilUpOnScience 2 жыл бұрын
Not really, because they are matter... unless you take the radioactive radiation definition, in which case beta radiation is electrons, so it kind of fits that categorisation... except it doesn't come from a radioactive element... a bit confusing - it's semantics really...
@ICallBullTV
@ICallBullTV 11 ай бұрын
Still didn't show how charged 'particles' exist except from a quote by JJ Thompson..... Show us proof that electrons exist
@shardinalwind7696
@shardinalwind7696 11 ай бұрын
You can’t exactly “see” those particles if they’re moving nearly at the speed of light.
@mani2831
@mani2831 10 жыл бұрын
so the tube is fully empty (vacuum),which medium carry's the electron to anode
@adrianflores8432
@adrianflores8432 9 жыл бұрын
There's no need for a medium to carry electrons, they just leave the atoms of the cathode (metal at the bottom) and travel to the atoms of the anode (metal at the top).
@yashas9974
@yashas9974 8 жыл бұрын
You need a bit of medium inside if you want to see the rays. Electron beams are invisible to human eye. They appear to be visible because they excite the gas atoms in their path which in turn emit photons/light when they de-excite/capture an electron.
@adrianflores8432
@adrianflores8432 8 жыл бұрын
Yashas Samaga You're absolutely right. However, the OP asked which medium "carried" the electrons, and there's no need for a medium to "carry" them. I was answering that question.
@Yash-Gaikwad
@Yash-Gaikwad 2 жыл бұрын
So electron can travel without ionising?
@scoutingkitalass
@scoutingkitalass 3 ай бұрын
Good
@mushahidhussain1516
@mushahidhussain1516 7 жыл бұрын
Derek seems bored.
@MrStemkilla
@MrStemkilla 12 жыл бұрын
@fcoalvaradov what are the direct effects of exposure to high amounts of radiation? we all know radiation poisoning but do you know of what is going on on the cellular level? yes all i know is from simplified diagrams and little bits i have picked up. what you stated was fairly interesting
@MrStemkilla
@MrStemkilla 12 жыл бұрын
inset this how xrays are made? x rays use a filament and a high voltage discharge in a vacuum.. very similar to this
@rapturecase
@rapturecase 11 жыл бұрын
derek's got a great cowlick in this vid
@MDGupta-pr7nd
@MDGupta-pr7nd 7 жыл бұрын
that balls
@fcoalvaradov
@fcoalvaradov 12 жыл бұрын
@MrStemkilla well radiation hits the cells of the body and the body absorbs the energy, the more dense is the tissue it hits the more it absorbs... there are specific tissues very sensitive to radiation (the cells that duplicate more) and basically this damages the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and the nucleus. This leading to damaging the DNA and further cellular problems. :) the acute absorption of radiation can lead to acute radiation syndrome which is nausea, vomiting, intestinal bleeding ...
@dr.abdullah.noman.
@dr.abdullah.noman. 2 ай бұрын
7173D
@MrStemkilla
@MrStemkilla 12 жыл бұрын
@fcoalvaradov i didn't know it damaged the other originals of cell :) but i knew the DNA part :D do you know of any tests done with exposure to very high amounts of radiation and the effects of that? like what they use to sterilize packed things? i think about 200 Rads a second Gamma.. yeah well what would happen apron exposure to that because that is high enough to kill cells on contact and its effect on a multi-cellular being would be interesting.
@fcoalvaradov
@fcoalvaradov 12 жыл бұрын
@MrStemkilla haha and I know what are the effects on the humans, as diagnostic tools and I have investigated a bit about radiation effects. I know just the basics on how they are made for diagnostic purposes. X rays, the more interesting are SPECT/CT, and PET/CT tomography scans. spect stands for single positron emission computerized tomography, and pet for Positron Emission Tomography... YES! positrons through our body and inside it!!! ;)
@shruti9604
@shruti9604 3 жыл бұрын
Hey I wanna come there.....
@mangai3599
@mangai3599 2 жыл бұрын
Professor looks a bit like Glenn McGrath.
@rothhaas
@rothhaas 9 жыл бұрын
111,111 in 2015! w00t!
@arturmizuno
@arturmizuno 8 жыл бұрын
158,005view 937th like 21 july 2016 at 23:58 Wow! what are the odds?! 0-0
@AAASSS-su9gy
@AAASSS-su9gy 8 жыл бұрын
what is the importance of metals here ?
@adventureswithfrodo2721
@adventureswithfrodo2721 8 жыл бұрын
the electrons in the outer shell of metal atoms are released more easily. metals are conductors ie allow the flow of electrons.
@AAASSS-su9gy
@AAASSS-su9gy 8 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@mrnaseem6507
@mrnaseem6507 4 жыл бұрын
What's plum pudding 😞
@viktorlindberg1462
@viktorlindberg1462 11 жыл бұрын
well particles can behave like waves so your argument is invalid i'm afraid. It's called the wave-particle duality. And not just some particles because then it would be called the some-paricle-wave duality. No, every particle can ( note the can ) behave like a wave and every wave can behave like a particle. Tho it is true that some particles are more often behaving like particles ( that's why we call them particles ) example: UV-light (or rays) are waves made up of fotons which are particles.
@Internizer
@Internizer 8 жыл бұрын
I thought Helium atoms are smaller than Hydrogen. Can anyone confirm this because he said that Hydrogen atoms were the smallest.
@dustinb3322
@dustinb3322 8 жыл бұрын
+Internizer Hydrogen has an atomic weight of 1.00794 while Helium has an atomic weight of 4.002602. Hope that clears it up for you.
@unpopiuinla
@unpopiuinla 8 жыл бұрын
+Internizer The problem is that in nature exists H2 (two atoms of hydrogen linked together), and He (a single atom of helium). So natural hydrogen is bigger than helium. A single atom of hydrogen tends to combine with anything, so it's quite impossible to get a simple H, even if theoretically hydrogen should be smaller than helium.
@Ilgor
@Ilgor 8 жыл бұрын
+unpopiuinla Those conditions apply here on Earth. Yet, most of the hydrogen (its not theoretical) in the Universe is in it's atomic form.
@adventureswithfrodo2721
@adventureswithfrodo2721 8 жыл бұрын
the key word here is atom, H is an atom. H2 is a molecule. so an atom of hydrogen is the smallest ATOM.
@unpopiuinla
@unpopiuinla 8 жыл бұрын
Ilgor , so in the universe hydrogen avoid the most common laws of chemistry?
@AAASSS-su9gy
@AAASSS-su9gy 8 жыл бұрын
Arent cathode rays are invisible light stream ?
@neerajrai3060
@neerajrai3060 8 жыл бұрын
+sachi codo beta (electron) particles
@thesantanagacha5661
@thesantanagacha5661 8 жыл бұрын
+AAA SSS No
@yashas9974
@yashas9974 8 жыл бұрын
They are NOT light but however they are invisible. They appear to be visible in the experiment because the electron knocks out electrons from the gas atoms when they collide and when an enter enters the exicted atom, a light ray is emitted which is why you can see the path of the rays.
@MrStemkilla
@MrStemkilla 12 жыл бұрын
@fcoalvaradov well what do you know about this type of things? i have never taken the class myself i just know that how they are made or have been made
@G12GilbertProduction
@G12GilbertProduction 4 жыл бұрын
"main camps" I read'em a "Mein kampfs". ROTFL.
@Harshnarxist
@Harshnarxist 9 ай бұрын
I dont know if there is an electron i only see a a purple colour 🙄 how identify?
@YummiR17
@YummiR17 7 жыл бұрын
Wow I'm late!
@ritasharma5407
@ritasharma5407 3 жыл бұрын
Great
@liveasifyouweretodietomorr4618
@liveasifyouweretodietomorr4618 2 жыл бұрын
Regrettably, now the model is actually not perfect. An atom doesn't look like that pudding it once did anymore. The Yum Yum model is just out of date! :(
The Big Misconception About Electricity
14:48
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
JJ Thomson Cathode Ray Tube Experiment: the Discovery of the Electron
10:38
Kathy Loves Physics & History
Рет қаралды 129 М.
Я нашел кто меня пранкует!
00:51
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
HOW DID HE WIN? 😱
00:33
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
Каха и суп
00:39
К-Media
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Why Does Everything Decay Into Lead
13:50
SciShow
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Watch gravity pull two metal balls together
12:47
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Discovery of the Electron: Cathode Ray Tube Experiment
11:08
Tyler DeWitt
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
How Quantum Computers Break The Internet... Starting Now
24:29
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
JJ Thomson and the discovery of the electron
23:19
PhysicsHigh
Рет қаралды 68 М.
This Particle Breaks Time Symmetry
9:00
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
How Japanese Masters Turn Sand Into Swords
25:27
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
World's Strongest Magnet!
23:05
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Я нашел кто меня пранкует!
00:51
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН