cEDH - Nadu, Osgir/Zirda, Wernog(Will)/Bjorna(Lucas), and Stella Lee

No video

cEDH - Nadu, Osgir/Zirda, Wernog(Will)/Bjorna(Lucas), and Stella Lee

Рет қаралды 641

Күн бұрын

cEDH game played on Spelltable. I want to start including decklists from games so I will do my best to have those links. #mtg #magicthegathering #commander #cedh
Osgir list: www.moxfield.c...

Пікірлер: 9

@krenarspahiu4261 29 күн бұрын

DA BIRD!!!! I do believe that the landfall triggers make the birds turns take longer than they should, but that's why I only have like 2 landfall effects in my deck. Lol

@E-ZPlaysMtg 26 күн бұрын

I think the landfall triggers act as Nadu's wincons. They make the turn long, but that's the indeterminate factor digging for the finish.

@krenarspahiu4261 26 күн бұрын

@E-ZPlaysMtg I think it depends on the build. It takes me about 5-6 minutes to represent my win. And that is usually with like 1 landfall creature.

@Tft220 Ай бұрын

Great to watch, but there was way too much salt at that table for a cedh game.

@Kizzet373 23 күн бұрын

agreed. They need to clean that up. Way too emotional.

@O6R3M4N Ай бұрын

I agree. Nadu isn't doing anything more broken than any other top tier cEDH deck

@sergiosanchez1956 14 күн бұрын

Why didn't Stella's player change the target of Apheto Archemist's ability, or Bristly Bill with spellskite, for example, so that Nadu's trigger wouldn't occur? Have I missed something?

@E-ZPlaysMtg 14 күн бұрын

For the Aphetto Alchemist, maybe would have been a worthwhile switch to reduce the number of triggers. Nadu only cares that the creature became a target, not necessarily that the creature remains the target upon resolution of spell/ability which targets. 🙂

@Sarkhamy 25 күн бұрын

The tabletalk here is kinda bad here. Players are way too worried about the non-deterministic win that oskir might have instead of the instead of the much very consistent win nadu is building in front of their very eyes.