Nicki Swift the one where you imply that Bill Nye is a scientist.

Get rid of the music and edit it properly?

Bingo! Bill "NOT a" Science guy.

None of them. Especially when you edit the interviews so severely that they lose all their "spice".

Yea... this video was pretty weak

I do to! (I dont know where the fuck he is) 😂😂😂😂😂👊👍🏿

Handled what? She was obviously drunk off her ass, she could barely speak. That was not deflection, that was incoherence.

I can't stand Mariah Carey.

Loll you could see it in her eyes 😄 trying to cover for him

Well we can’t stand your premature ejaculator Marshall Mathers or whatever his name is, dahling!

Thankyou!! I was thinking the exact same thing

Amir Mohammad Taherian Muslins don’t like women hahahahaha hahahahaha

BA Peach if This was a man, Amir would probably be just as annoyed

@@CC-ok2kt male female I dont give a damn,let the video tell the story rather then blather on for your 15 seconds of fame just as filler to draw the video length out

Amen. She didn't even show the whole interview where there were problems. Weak video! Horrible!

He was in bibis ass

Hot as hell when she was young too though.

@@markant9534 I had no idea she was so fine

Polished quite a few knobs in her youth too

@@dwillbecancelledsoon4086 So did you!

@@bobbogee simp

She's a libtard so she's not as intelligent as one would think. Some people can be incredibly smart and incredibly dumb at the same time. It is how you choose to use your intelligence that matters. She chose acting. Blah. Hollywood is garbage.

If Hollywood is garbage to you, then why are you watching this. Mayim Bialik is one smart lady. Went into acting at a young age, because of her parents. Then moved away from Hollywood to study. She came back to Hollywood probably because it pays more but with the knowledge that she has done other things

@@Bonzi_Buddy The whole point of your cringe laden comment was to bash "libtards". As transparent as a window, my friend. 😅

Darth He probably has frosted glass windows ;p

Honestly Mayim is being a bit self congratulatory there. She absolutely has a degree which would qualify her to begin a career in the field of neuroscience however she has never actually worked in that field so I do feel calling herself a neuroscientist is a bit disingenuous.

same..

Me tooo!!

Thinking the same. i dont even watch or know most of these ppl either.

i feel so dirty after every vid

SevenFour I obviously have no life!! Lol. Must be the reason I’m watching!! 😂

“Empowered”…. LOL

Just a standard shitlib britbong. Barren womb = genetic dead end

Ricki-Sue King I know, I love Emma Thompson =)

She's got a point. Who cares about the royal family?

Ricki - true, but she's a bigot

Ricki-Sue King she is a big headed snob. An inverted snob spouting leftie views that aren’t based in fact .Full of herself

Youre so right! And she was actually saying she's wasn't invested in some stranger's wedding, because her own child has an upcoming wedding- which is a million times more special and important to her and the interviewer didn't care at all! I mean I'm surprised she kept it calm with all that goading.

Cynthia Esquibel I agree. She’s a classically beautiful, sophisticated lady.

I agree!

The epitome of class

My mum worked at a hotel where Helen Mirren was staying while filming locally a while ago. Helen apparently left the room absolutely ruined, and a mess, so whenever I see her I always remember that. (Granted if I remember correctly she apparently was staying with a friend also) She did handle it well!

I agree. These celebs featured and other like them need to have their egos fed nonstop.

This is my favorite one. Mila is a boss.

@@katsaymeow Agreed, I love Mila!

Mayim was grace under pressure, unlike the rest of them!

She is a real badass!!!!!

@@peonylee4773 she seams a little stressed right now with the Corona virus. God bless her.

and imagine having to deal with dumb/annoying questions over and over and over again. we'd all eventually snap. i'm surprised it doesn't happen more often with how constantly dumb a lot of interviewers questions are.

A lot of truth in that.

Agreed

😂💯

Mechanical Engineering is an applied science. No matter what field a person with that degree goes into, science has to be used a lot when coming up with designs, designing equipment/vehicles/buildings/ships/space-ships etc...not to mention practical applications for things everyday people use. Without them 'there's no vehicles, no launchpad, no shuttle, no electricity, no electrical grid, and no running water. So yes, they are scientists. Believe it or not, not all scientists spend their days in the lab. Ever heard of Nicola Tesla?

Somebody doesn't understand the difference between science and engineering. And I don't mean the OP.

I don't know Bill Nye, his background or work, so take this with a grain of salt, I'm just going on what has been said here, but... To all those here saying, he is a scientist because he got an engineering degree: science is about the application of the scientific method to model phenomena. Lets unpack this and its implications. A scientist is someone who can do that, or is doing it. A scientist is someone who can, either design or carry out experiments to acquire data about a phenomenon of interest to study it, use his or other scientists' data to verify hypotheses about some phenomena, come up with hypotheses or theories about phenomena to be tested, or infer predictions from theories. (This is not necessarily an exhaustive list, it is a real world activity obviously, with more texture that my little model here shows, but it is enough to give an idea of what I'm talking about.) An engineer designs, builds, tests or fixes machines or mechanisms. This uses the knowledge produced by scientists, but is not science per se. Of course, it is possible to do both at the same time. If you design or build machines where in a domain where the science isn't settled, for instance, such as, for experiments in high energy physics, nanotechnology, biosystems or genetic engineering. So, yes, they might mingle, but they are not the same. It is possible to do a lot of one and almost none of the other. Very theoretical scientific work has negligible engineering in it. Engineering where the science is settled and the predictions have been worked out by others, for example, high up in the fab complex, such as designing new computers. There is a modern tendency to overvalue education, and to take certifications at face value. When you go through an educational program, you are supposed to learn something. The exams you take there and the certification issued are supposed to test what you learned, certify it, and summarise it with some grades. There are several issues with this: grades are an oversimplification, people cheat in diverse ways, and some people are very good at doing homework, doing tests and certifying themselves, but to the extent that the modern educational system does not do apprenticeships, what you do in a modern university is not quite the same as what you do in a profession, so it is possible to do one and not the other. The other side of the coin is that it is possible to learn these professions without going to school, as an apprentice or even an autodidact. So, if Bill Nye has an engineering degree, that does not guarantee that he is a decent engineer, and it definitely says little about his capacity to do science. Unless he failed in his education or cheated, it does mean he probably understands some science that has been researched and published, but that does not mean he can do it. To show a crass example, a lot of people can understand literature, but few of those could write it. Writing a whole novel or book involve complex skills that go beyond writing a few paragraphs well, even. I'm not saying those people couldn't do it if they train or practice, but at the moment, you wouldn't commission a book from someone who has done neither. Finally, and at the risk of ruffling some feathers, I'll add something. A lot of people who worship science, but don't practice it (yes, worship, in the sense of taking their cosmovision, ie, their explanation of the world and their origin story, from science, and of looking for science to provide all their answers and solve all their problems, while resting all their hopes in it), are very invested in broadening the definition of science. Of course, as with priests and laypeople in an institutional religion, there is an asymmetry of power, and nobody like to be at the lower end of one of those. So, the broader the definition, and the more people who are considered "scientists", the more the power is diffused. "Proper scientists" then defend their power by declaring a lot of poor efforts or crackpot theories "psuedoscience". This is equally silly and really unnecessary. It is even contrary to the ideals of science. (If you don't like someone's work, or their misuse of the term science, then critique their work on its technical merits, or ignore, just designating their whole work invalid, by creating a special category for that, like ad hominem attacks, is not a scientific way of arguing against it.) Anybody can and should do science, if they so desire, but it does take some learning and practice. This naked power grab by scientists and their groupies, is beneath the dignity of science. Crucially, it is not just technical knowledge that is needed to do science, it involves a set of attitudes and philosophy, as well as some cognitive skills. While related to the mindset taught to engineers, it is not at all the same. This, of course, does not impede some engineers from learning both. I will reiterate that I am saying little, and claiming nothing, about Bill Nye, whose work I don't know any more than I know him. This is merely about the notion that any engineer is a scientist, or that anybody with an engineering degree is an engineer.

Being a scientist has little to do, with where you spend your time (not that the OP claimed that), but with doing, having done, or at least knowing how to do science. Engineering uses scientific results, yes, but that neither proves nor disproves that a particular engineer can do science. Believe it or not, having some level of scientific literacy and being able to apply scientific results does not prove that someone can do science. Yes, I've heard about Nicola Tesla, but, believe it or not, a specific example does not prove a generalisation, it can only disprove one. So, one capable engineer who can't do science, is enough to know that not all of them can (and believe me, I've met plenty), but one who can is just that, one positive example, with no general implications. And that, moreover, since you are so gung ho about science and engineering, is an example of a type of knowledge, rules of inference, that is not super useful for engineers, but quite crucial to scientists. (Not saying that a good engineer wouldn't understand this trivial example, just giving an example of a domain of knowledge which is necessary for mathematicians (who are also not necessarily scientists) and scientists, but only of passing interest to engineers.)

Seems like much conversation, likely by people who are neither scientists or engineers (degreed and certified). My family are. My dad was a Mechanical and Electrical engineer, with international credentials and certs, obtained after he mustered out in 1946 and went to UAH. In the 70s he was on accreditation committees for universities. He could really care less about science and pure theory. He hated his chemistry courses and saw physics as only useful Newtonian and static force training. Yet he built and lit the bridges and tunnels you drive on today in the US/Can, UK, and West Germany. I can testify from observation engineering is not applied cutting edge science. Science from 1750 maybe, but not modern science in most cases. I took a doctorate in Chemistry. I do applied science, and I teach. My daughter is working on her degree in BioChemistry. We are quite aware of the differences in personality, passion and walking around knowledge. My guess is Nye bashing has somehow become the an assumed intent from the OP. I'm fine with the man as an engineer and children's TV comic. Mr Nye is an aviation mechanical engineer that left Boeing around 30 because he won a Steve Martin look alike contest. He then went on a comedy circuit and pursued acting in the 1980s. He got a job with Disney channel, so I put him about where I put Jeremy Clarkson, as a comic presenter of technical material. He did offer a device to NASA, a sundial for a Mars rover. Sundials were a passionate hobby of he and his mother. He carries three patents if I recall: ballet shoes, a novelty plastic bag magnifying "glass" project for children, a ball throwing gadget and an abacus. Sounds like a former engineer and current tinkerer. He may have the passion for theoretical science my pragmatic dad lacked, but apparently not the training or credentials. We all have our parts to play on this great stage of life.

Yeah I hate the narrators of the kinds of youtube videos.

Perhaps, but at least she's not the type of person who likes to make prejudiced and uninformed comments about peoples' character on the internet.

heteroclitus Technically, we don't know that she doesn't do that, because we don't know her at all- either way. However, I agree that we can't really judge whether she's 'faking being down to Earth' or whatever, since none of us know her. People need to hate and judge less. I'm also curious why so many people have made this assumption of her.

Scarlett Johanson beats Jennifer Lawrence any day of the week.

Maybe the nature of the industry is that women have to develop diva-ness to some degree to scare off the Harvey Weinsteins and people who try to take advantage in other ways. Maybe they don't always know when to turn it off.

yes, thinking be in the position to judge is ridiculous, xD

*cough* Jennifer Lawrence *cough *

Considering the questions asked, I think Helen Mirren showed faaaaaar more restraint.

I actually thought she was very rude. She's not so big a star that you'd know her entire life history or educational background. And why would anyone assume she's a neuroscientist AND also an actress. I'm pretty sure most neuroscientists don't moonlight on sitcoms. Jeez, I thought her reaction to the question was pretentious and ridiculous.

She's so homely and repulsive.

@@Texas.wildflower1 actually, in multiple interviews has said that she took the role because she is actually neuroscientist. So everyone knows that. And as interviewer you should know some basic things before you interview someone.

Samantha Brandt, he was looking at the “Translation” as he knows hardly any English! I use to think she was a pretty kool Kat and a decent actor but now think she’s a bit of an asshole

I was about to say he was probably reading a translated text as English isn’t his first language. In my opinion she was just being rude.

Now That's a genuine snowbunnie ms Sammie

And why was he reading from his phone? Was he too dumb to know what questions to ask? And don't give me that translation BS. He had an accent, but he spoke English.

He wasn't reading a translation. He was taking pictures as he was asking questions. It's been supported by multiple reporters who were also there. He should have taken pics before and after his question. He was rude not Jennifer Lawrence.

She doesnt mind telling you that either. If you are a scientist, and graduated college 10 years ago and dont practice what you learned to become a '' scientist.'' Can you honestly still claim to be one. Knowing that you have forgotten about half or more of what you learned, working in another career. Retake the test, lets see how you score. No more scientist.

He's an actor 😊 propagandist

Mechanical engineering is a science...

@@jesuschrist5857 it’s a different kind of science. Not chemistry or biology as he likes to pretend.

He can play with Legos.

She's a douche

Nobody does anymore

Me neither

I don't know what it is about her but I don't care for her much either. I lost respect for her when a rumor spread she slept with Chris Pratt while he was still married to Anna Faris. Of course she denied it.

She makes my skin crawl

They already made a video featuring that.

I had the same interview on my mind. Well there is always the possibility of a follow up clip

James Danowski he was joking.

James Danowski, tbh, it's a bit bad that someone would mistake him for another black actor. And he was mistaken for someone else only because they are both black. It wasn't an intentional diss at SLJ or black people, but it was the interviewer's unconscious carelessness and prejudice that caused his inability to distinguish two completely different people. All he saw was a build, an age and a skin colour and couldn't separate two people.

What superbowl commercial?

She's an amazing actress! Check out her work.

Shawn for President thank you I was just about to type that

If you want to listen to someone who does know many factors involved in climate, look up Dr Willie Soon, lots of KZfaq videos. Bill Nye does have an engineering degree, but, doesn’t know jack about the world’s climate. His show used to teach kids you have either an XX (female) or XY (male) chromosome set. This part of that show has gone down the memory hole. Yes, there are a few unfortunate people that have odd variances, but they are few and far between. What happened to Bill Nye the Science Guy who made science fun for kids instead of trying to scare the crap out of them.

*SIGH* Engineers are scientists. They have a degree called a BSE. Bachelor of SCIENCE in engineering.

@@kathypease1711 you might want to look up the definition of scientist. I’m an RN with a degree in applied science, but I def wouldn’t call myself a scientist.

Ya beat me to it...

Bill Nye is listed correctly with "entertainers", they are liars THAT WE PAY to lie to us!

WORD

LS D get ur own channel, hahahahaha hahahahaha

Agreed

For sure - no doubt about it.

Fun fact, a master’s graduate has twice the number of neural networks in their brain as a high school graduate. So comparing a PhD Neuroscientist to two award show hosts, your claim is actually entirely factually accurate. 😂

She seems douchy and snooty. I wouldn't want her at my party.

Aaron Lemons i think she just got annoyed or offended man, like if u spent that many years training and studying and someone commented on ur capabilities you’d be dumbfounded too

Olivia Calton that’s not true. Where did you get this information from? Fool.

The only people who think Mayim looks amazing are people who look like her . . . namely you know who.

"Amazing"? Woof

SHE INDEE IS RUDE AND SHE THINKS SHE IS FANNY AND COOL.

No filter

She isnt rude. She says what she thinks. If she was a male it would be ok.

I love JL’s honest approach. I don’t see her as trying to act cool. She’s just being direct while inserting her sense of humor. Apparently she rubs some people the wrong way. My daughter doesn’t like her either. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Mr. Deamon... Yea.... but I'm not taxed to pay for cameramen or woman. Mr. Deamon... is clueless.

Cameraman was off base but so is Damon the hippo sized hypocrite. He sends his kids to private schools. He's about as honest as Rosie O'Donnell who rails on about the NRA then sends her kids to private school with armed guards.

you can apply the 10 percent to almost every profession and 50 percent for news cameramen and interviewers. but its a situation out of control rather than ask interesting questions they resort to baiting so they get a response. it's lazy and disrespectful.

*@BioStuff415:* Yeah, I'm taxed to pay for wars I don't support, but I have to pay them anyway. The question was stupid and the statistic is meaningless. I know a lot of right-wing tools are now griping about the teachers union and so on, so they love this sort of comment. But it was irrelevant. Most teachers aren't lazy, just as most people in whatever profession _you_ are in aren't lazy. However, the right-wing media doesn't focus on _your_ particular profession, and question the integrity of the whole group based on the performance of a tiny minority. Matt Damon had a clever comeback, and it was a far better question because it shined light on the stupidity of the original question.

*@MusicTennis3000:* So what, he sends his kids to private school? How does that make him a hypocrite?

stryfetc1 youtube it lol the guy was asking about his past drug abuse and stuff about his dad and rdj wasnt there for that

It was the same guy who interviewed (and pissed off) Quentin Tarantino. He's a terrible Channel 4 reporter who purposefully tries to dig up the past, a lesser version of Piers Morgan.

EpicGravity908 that was not a confrontation. Robert walked out.

EpicGravity908 they already did another compilation video about awkward interviews with Robert in it.

EpicGravity908 Downey was in his rights I think to be pissed off about that it was very off topic.

She's great! Love her smile. That interviewer was a dumbass. He must not realize that some people aren't obsessed with the royal family. Myself included.

Yes, apparently this person did not understand that a scientist is someone who studied and majored in a scientific field. In his case, he earned a BSE - a bachelors of *SCIENCE* in Engineering. Funny how so few people seem to think that is literally what makes someone a scientist.

Did you see how pissed Chris Pratt was when listening to her? I know everyone laughed, but I bet most of them were really upset with her.

Or how Jennifer Lawrence always says she's just a regular normal person by saying she's a regular normal person all the time.

Seeing as you have no idea what he was looking at & you are therefore assuming things...how do you get to form such a strong opinion of a stranger?

Haha people that dk around with their phones for any reason while trying to talk to me.They look up and i am long gone.If he needed his phone to ask a question..he is a fkn idiot.Hey man maybe i should send my kid in there to do his "job".

Shekola Carrington she pissed me off too. And she's rude

she's really good at answering questions. one of my favourites was when she was asked to name 3 things she liked about eminem. she said something like, "they come in a packet, you can get them with or without peanuts, etc." was hilarious.

Yeah, I think they didn't do their research and just went [insert man here]. Cause obviously a man would know calculus, just because he's a man. Not.

What?? What is that supposed to mean? I'm a man an I know nothing about calculus. So what?

You do understand that a BS means a bachelors of *SCIENCE*, right?

@@kathypease1711 That only really means you have a college level education in a scientific field, most people that are actually considered "Scientists" have YEARS of post-graduate studies, field-related work and published works in that field. Bill Nye DOES have some engineering experience working for Boeing, but most would consider his level of work and education to be that of a "Technician" and the fact that he left said field less than 10 years after graduation without applying for a higher degree would pretty much confirm that. The vast majority of his work is in the entertainment industry (some may call it "Edutainment"). Science proponent? Absolutely. Scientist? No. Educator? For sure.

Tree Hugger okay so I’m not the only one who thought this. Haha granted, I think they are different scenarios.

Tree Hugger lmao

Ashley Alexandria scenario? What scenario?

Tree Hugger

As in other interviews? They are in fact a few videos by this channel on confrontational interviews with celebrities. However they show different parts of the same and even some differing interviews. A lot of channels do the same thing, they’ll put the same thing in two separate video, granted they phrase things differently. I think what she meant was that while some segments are the same, they show different parts of the interviews.

666Etnies666 I thought Mariah and Solange has every right to say what they said

Lol...that blackness jumped out real quick.

But she was a right old tart who got her kit off at the drop of a hat when she was young. Parkinson was quite right in his interview.