even better on my TN Panel.

@@someoneinasia even better on my tube ray

Even better on my CRT panel.

Even better on my e-ink kindle

Even better in my hesd

​@Feng the first 4K tv cost $6000, the first OLED tv cost $15000, these cost $150,000, it's not the same at all.

@Feng he can now tho, see how it’s wise to wait a generation or two. Not everyone has Infinite money you should try to keep that in mind

@@teme7292 This isn't the first generation. They have had these available for a couple years now. "The Wall" is the first generation and currently starts at about 80 grand. I don't expect these to get below 10 grand in the next 7 to 10 years.

there are a lot of people who can easily buy this.. just not us 😂

Okay...

😂😂😂

Same.

*I saw *I've seen

I'm hoping Samsung follows lgs path and incorporates gaming features then this display could become one of the best displays in history

How much better than QD-OLED is it?

@@tbone5654 I haven’t seen QD Oled much but I have an LG C1 and it’s a lot better. Almost like the difference going from LED to and Oled tv

@Alex Tobola What you said made no sense 🤔

​@Mobarak Jama yes, it $150k

@150000??? Really.. so close to a G63...😂😂😂😂😂

What? Microled is literally just lcd with more dimming zones because of smaller LEDs, QDOLED is superior in everyway

@@AndrewB23 no it's not.. because every micro LED generates it's own light.. so doesn't need any backlit.. so basically MicroLED is OLED aswell...

@@AndrewB23 that’s mini led you are talking about not micro

@@AndrewB23 Microled is every advantage of Oled and more with none of the downsides. Pixel dimming / 1000+ nits full screen / zero retention / instant response time. It is the end game of panel tech, there's no comparison.

It’s still not the holy grail since sample and hold display can only produce 360p of motion resolution, unlike plasma and crt which were 1080p at the least

It's just oled but not organic

@@madl99 Rather, it's just LED, but really small, while OLED is also small, yet its being organic makes it last not very long.

@@getsideways7257 the only biggest benefits will be the burning problem

@@DeepakChauhan-qv2qc Not the only benefit. By using "just" really small LEDs the brightness of Micro-LED will compare to the Mini-LED screens of the world while still bringing in the per-pixel illumination of OLED.

@@EmilFDT thats it

Or in 2077...

nah, oled it is

@rgo rgo lol oled? This technology is superior buddy. Samsung is the king of electronics and they are thr most advanced tech company in the world. Even Sony is licensing this tech from Samsung, Vizio and TCL as well.

@Rev it's probably intentional-- unsophisticated buyers will be drawn towards exaggerated colors/brightness over floor models that prioritize accuracy.

Electroluminescent quantum dots

Nah, oled invented by company called Eastman Kodak, MicroLED invented by Hongxing Jiang and Jingyu Lin. Samsung didn't invent any screen technology, they only develop and can be said to "copy" because they think it's their innovation

This tech has been in development for many years. You could literally buy one last year, albeit for something like $100k. This video they showed at CES is them saying that the technology is ready for prime time consumer sales.

@@jimherold7827 True but it will realistically take a decade before the prices are sane for the average person. 5 years for people with a good chunk of disposable income.

It doesn’t have the Dolby Vision unfortunately

@Abdullah Al-otibi I know that sadly. Samsung is rich but cheap when it comes to Dolby Vision

I'm excited about these too, but it'll be 10 years before they are below 10 grand. Guessing 5 years to get below 30 grand. Their currently existing model ("The Wall") has been around for a few years and starts at 80 grand.

@@davidjung2831 the The Dolby vision is better than HR10 plus because they give the actual colour more than HR10 which give you a lighter colour

@@abdullahal-otibi6 In practise It's hard to notice any difference

Hmm, i see

Distance and Sony Bravia got there first

No!

Yeah , 2040 y 🤣🤣😫😫😫😫😫

I truly prefer the Television 📺 Technology of Micro Led Displays very much deeply than the current QD-Oled or EX -Oled because these products 😀 still used the Material of Organic products to put the inner-housing leds into place. The 👍 Organic Material products degradation over time is not very good at all with the Organic Material in the display 👌 of Oled Material. I honestly appreciate the Inorganic Material Structure of Micro Led Display very much 👌 better my the display of my choice in the future time. This is honestly the reason why I do not buy current Television Display Technology whether it is QD-Oled or WRGB EX Or MMLA Display right now. It is still Organic Material Display combined with the LEDs in them to shine ✨️ light on the Display Screen Structure ✨️ 😀 😍 👌!! I truly thank you very much, but I am honestly going wait for the Micro LEDs Display Television 📺 😀 to come around very shortly 😀 to show that the better technology exit right now 😀 👍!!

120inches is way to big for 4K. At that size 8k displays are the best alternative.

8K displays or higher will all be MicroLED.

42 in 500 hz

Not happening anytime soon, look at OLEDs it’s been around for over a decade and only now is it making its way into the consumer monitor space

*giving* not having 😊

Key point here: “people who can afford it”

In 2022 they had a showcase of a couple 4K models ranging from 76" to 100-something". So at least a 75 inch 4K model should be doable.

It scales with the lithography process. At that time it was either 10nm or 7nm, with high spec nodes like 3nm GAAFET it should enable ~4 times the resolution density.

First you put down $100k deposit then they will tell you the details. The fact that you asking now means you can't afford it, you don't go into a Ferrari dealership and ask about details you pay for it first

The Wall wasnt aimed at living room use, its more for commercial use, like marketing displays, board room displays and the like.

@@ms3862 Only Portofino buyers do this. Any sane person that buys a car knows exactly what he's getting. Brand markup is not luxury. Grandeur comes from craftsmanship and exclusivity.

It's the angles - if you view MicroLED from the sides you can the individual panels, you have to view it straight on

@@ms3862 OK, I didn't know. Thanks for elaborating.

this is true with other systems, but from what i hear, its pretty dang difficult to see the individual panels with Samsungs system, the TV has to be off and a light cast on it while looking at an extreme angle. I am an LED wall engineer, and if you take your time and put up a wall slow and correctly, you can do it where seems are very difficult to see. The reason a lot of poeple assume all LED walls or panel based systems are like this, is because a majority of them installed or used, are thrown together in a rush or too quickly causing panel seems to be visible, or the walls themselves are not correctly maintained. I installed a 16' foot wall in a sports bar and the owner was particularly worried about seems, so i was meticulous with it and you cant see the seems from any angle when its on, and only at extreme angles when its off.

I agree the cost is a turn off, not only that they are making these displays using Sheep in abusive labor from poor Chinese people, and then charging us an arm and leg to buy it

It is part of the manufacturing consideration for cost and yields. If there is flaw in a 75inch LCD, say a cluster of dead pixels, the whole thing has to be binned. If there is a flaw when making a 75inch micro LED, then that flaw is in a smaller panel, and only that smaller panel is binned.

😂🥺🥲

Like me too ❤

Oh they'll come, but with a price!

You'll settle for the 50" in 7 years for the same price. For bragging rights of having a MicroLED. ;)

@@overnightdelivery No way i'm getting a 50" tv lol

Innovative is not what the world needs but compromise and value at affordable price.

LED is not the best display technology.

LG Display Co. ltd is developing/manufacturing OLED panels and LG Electronics is making wireless TVs.

@@ZackSNetwork ....what?..

@@___Amal_ they just have a messed up One-connect box copy, that gives nothing new, samsung's box had it solved 5+ years ago, one cable goes into the TV direcly, now LG tries to resell it like its own :D still, one cable goes into their TV so...no improvement, no extra comfort, no innovation here.

@@ZackSNetwork qdel?

Sony‘s idea,almost 2 years before Samsung. Samsung gets the credit.

Which will be worse than stand alone speakers. Built-in tv speakers aren’t good

Lol even sony have that

240Hz

5 years, minimum.

@@saxombie8614 🤣🤣🤣more like 100years

Add not a review

it will easily reach that, non organic LEDs have extreme brightness, the reason OLEDs are dimmer is because pushing them bright causes failure due to their organic nature. This is basically a miniaturized version of LED walls. This is the future of TVs, once it becomes affordable in time.

@@Reazintful easy 1000 nits

I might be wrong, but wanna guess more than 3000 nits.

It’s still not the holy grail of display until they address the motion resolution limitations of sample and hold display

@@AusOpening Can you explain? I know what sample and hold displays are. But I don't know anything about motion resolution.

Not to mention computer monitors?

Samsung says they'll start in 2039

20 years at least

The resolution would be way too low for a phone using this tech.

It’s not the low resolution; it’s the small size of the mobile device. It’s extremely costly and difficult to create individual pixels as such a microscopic level using inorganic (OLED is organic) materials. Thus a bigger display requires bigger pixels and less effort to manufacture.

@@davidd6637 Who are you responding to? The guy above you is right. The pixels aren't yet small enough, thus putting them on a small screen would result in a low resolution, just like you said.

Apple will adopt Micro LED

@@TanveerAhmed-dk3rp proof? Its Samsung creation and without their permission how is apple gonna bought this technology? I m pretty sure it will be their S line up or laptop lineup first to adapt this tech following any other company

probably much better than current tech due to crazy efficiency of LEDs and lack of any sort of filters and extra layers that block light, meaning they don't need to output as much energy to get through the extra layers, in addition to simply having less stuff to power.

I think what they trying say is that MicroLED dont have fixed resolution like other TV's that they can be manufactured in any sizes, shapes, resolution, orientation etc, since it is modular

Well, you see the micro LEDs will have 25 million LEDs because each LED is it own RGB light right so that means it will be three times sharper than a conventional 4K TV in 4K resolution and an 8K micro LED TV will be a whole new level of detail because it come with four times as many LEDs as a 4K micro LED, which means 100 million LEDs crazy right

the 2022 microled modules had less pixel density so that for getting 4K resolution we need to arrange the modules to 110 inches diagonally. At 55 inches, they are still 1080p resolution.

From what I remember, with microLED you can stuff 10K into a 2" or 3" panel, now do the math for a 100-incher... Basically, there is no single GPU or other image processing chip that could handle *all* of the pixels in one, hence "resolution free" - you will have to artificially restrict the output to a virtual resolution (probably 12K or whereabouts).

Every pixel already contains multiple leds, as shown in the video.

They hog electricity and heat up the room way more than any other tv.

@@IwinMahWay no

​@@IwinMahWayNo, microled are the most energy efficient tech, maybe the first tvs are going to be that much more efficient, but when the tech mattures they can reach 50 % less power consumption and generated heat.

🤣🤣🤣🤣150k usd. This is just another effort of Samsung to be firstwhen other companies can do it also but chose not toas it is bad for business.