Scary stuff honestly. This kind of content is a threat to the credibility of the CFAI. Thank you Mark for shedding light on this and for helping us making more informed decisions. I hope they will postpone the registrations for these pathways until fixed

We owe you Mark, your challenging their garbage is needed and appreciated

This is not a liberal arts undergraduate course We completely understand whats going on here, cfai will realize it soon as they loose their credibility

Wow, no kidding, CFAI is already trying to tell us how to think. Next, they'll be telling us that ESG is more important than analysis.

In 2023, I finally earned my charter after four years of dedication. However, I'm extremely disappointed and angry with CFAI for the quality of content and readings provided by them. The lack of political neutrality and inaccuracies in the materials have shocked me. Margaret Franklin's leadership is questionable, and she risks diminishing the value of the charter many of us worked hard to achieve.

Wow. At this point you should develop your own certification. “Mark Meldrum Certified” or MMC. It would have more credibility than where CFAI is headed..

There needs to be a rule - that only CFAs can write the curriculum. As simple as that.

Thank you Mark for this video, I was puzzled before choosing the path in L3 now it clear for me : portfolio construction +applied series

I would argue that they are violating their own code of ethics. "Distinguish between fact and opinion in the presentation of investment analysis and recommendations". They are presenting their opinion as fact when talking about the presentation of wealth inequality. Also with them outright lying, that is misconduct...

Really happy I don’t have to go through this after passing! Thanks so much Mark, you really helped me get over the line 🤩

This seriously impairs the credibility of CFAI. The two new pathways need to be completely re-written, it isn't just something that can be "polished over time". The argument for pursuing the charter has always been the quality of the education you receive. Unfortunately, these changes seriously impair that. This is the worst thing the institute has ever done and its not even close

Damn I'm so outraged. Thank you for this, professor.

The irony is that the CFA institute has increased their fees,made cfa study materials as separately charged but still has the audacity to teach about woke nonsense, amazing.

The U.S. being removed from all charts is just unreal. This is what they raised the exam fees for? Note how the old CFA readings all had the authors listed. I'm honestly getting a little annoyed by how much the CFAI is covering its buttocks at the cost of the candidates. Errors everywhere in the curriculum--sometimes so blatant that even an unprepared candidate cannot miss them, authors not cited so we don't even know if the person writing this has any idea what they're talking about, no visibility into the contents of the exams and how they are graded to the point that there is a section in Ethics concerning how any discussion of past exam contents will get you kicked out. CFAI: Clumsy Fallacy Administrators Institute. Eroding trust one exam season at a time.

I’m really worry because this will be my second attempt, but I really “hate” the portfolio pathway because I strongly disagree with the hypothesis of efficient markets, so I was excited to take the private pathway, but with this information that you presented to us, now I don’t know what to do 😅. Thanks for your time, best regards from Colombia

This is the most satisfying explanation for income and wealth inequality (and for why socialism failed) that anyone has ever provided me with, i truly thank my stars every day for introducing me to your content 😂

Good Job Mark! 👏🏼…continue to apply pressure.

This is unbelievable! Incompetence is everywhere and is being appreciated! CFA institution to do such a thing is unacceptable!

Wow very upsetting that CFAI have signed off on this. Thanks for the thorough review and guidance Mark Meldrum. I was excited about the specialized pathway feature for 2025 but will be staying on the beaten path for now.

May I ask if you will do a breakdown on your new offerings for Level 1 CFA with instructor led?

I would be very reluctant to hire a money manager that earned their charter in 2025 especially since the designation does not reflect the specialization path. I would be terrified to get someone that when down the Private Wealth pathway and find out that they actually bought into that content. I also think that in hiding the specialization it also means they don't believe in it themselves. quote From CFAI website Q: "Will the CFA charter reflect the specialized path an individual earns? A: No, there will be no distinction made on the charter itself.

This is shocking... thanks for exposing it, Mark

Dr Meldrum - I used your course to pass Level I and Level II in 2021. I left the financial industry shortly after to pursue a unique opportunity and thus never sat or studied for Level III. For these reasons I haven't kept up much with the changes in the program or with any of the discourse surrounding the program. I'm considering re-arming to study for the exam and achieve the charter, as I would like to have an easier time being able to re-enter the industry if I want to return, and for the fact that I started this mission and left it unfinished while being so close to the end. I was wondering if you had any advice for someone who is coming back to Level III after not engaging with any CFA content since 2021. I was also wondering if your opinion on the value of getting the charter has changed at all over the past few years.

@markmeldrum, are the Blue Box, End of Chapter, Topic Test practice questions the same in 2024 vs 2025 for the Portfolio Construction Pathway (PCP)? And if so, is it likely the style and format of the 2024 exam could be similar to the 2025 PCP exam? Thank you

Do you ever get tired of being basically correct all the time?

I registered this morning and was excited. Watched this video, and now I’m deflated. Seriously thinking about requesting a refund within the 14 day grace period.

Mark Any response or comments following your mail to CFAI? THKS for this deep analysis.

I am trying to buy a per section but it’s showing 99/ section when I am choosing the section instead of the 74 USD

Can you, please, tell me in the portfolio management pathway only one reading is changed which you showed? or there are another changes also compared to 2024 curriculum?

Dear Dr. Mark. I am wondering if you will be offering to teach Private Market? Or just you will provide videos for Portfolio construction / traditional pathway?

Hi Mark, I'm a level 3 CFA candidate and a professional (senior financial planner) in wealth management who advises ultra-high net worth clients. I was looking forward to the specialization in wealth management to deepen my knowledge, but what you are presenting here is concerning. I'm now considering just sticking with the more traditional path for the exam and reading some of the wealth management sections as a supplement to my career. Would it be possible for you to share which sections you think are worth reading? Thanks.

Hello profesor, how different is L1 2025 curriculum when compared to 2024?

17:00 - look at the 'Y' Axis lmao. what a joke

The AI in CFAI stands for Artificial Intelligence, huh.

The CFAI should have to cite their sources on all facts and have clear distinctions for opinions. The fact that they don't shows they do not follow their own ethical code and standards.

Mark, I'm writing level 3 in August, but I'm thinking of deferring to 2025 instead. Clearly it is best to stick to the portfolio management pathway. However, do you know how much the content will differ for 2025 vs 2024 for this same pathway? Will there be big changes?

another famous MM rant. LOVE EEETTTT

Well, at least we’ll still appeal to the managerial elites.

I really hope this gets as many views as possible. Thank you, Dr Meldrum, for everything.

MM is the GOAT!

Did I heard wrong or is registration available today? I had it on my reminders list but the webpage is only giving me August 2024

We need find out who is author

Were those modules written by Chat GPT?

I watched this trying to defend CFAI and I could argue a case for the wealth inequality and some justification for the wealth management but I have no words for the sloppyness. This is borderline chatgpt level of content. I don't think a sociologist wrote that last reading since a real sociologist would have a much higher standard and would have some insightful critique somewhere there.

Nady abro

Really hoping that CFAI fix and improve all these issues because I’m really interested in taking private market pathway. But without any further information is better stay with the original pathway.

Hi Mark, thanks for the review. Is there a possibility for you to give a direct feedback to CFAINSTITUTE ? Because education should be less of politics or propagandas and more of knowledge! They can rewrite the content ? Thanks for taking your time in analysing for us..

Take a shot whenever Mark says “another list”

Dam.. I was so excited about private markets

It’s seriously concerning to me that they aren’t sharing the names of the people writing this content. Especially when it’s this low-quality. The pathways sounded like a stupid, overly ambitious idea to begin with and they completely botched the implementation it looks like.

When will we be able to purchase your level 1 package for Feb 2025?

I’ve been waiting a year to choose the private market pathway in my second attempt. I know you mentioned in the video that there is no incremental value, just a repetition of level 1 and level 2 content. - My plan is to work in the private market in the future. - I've already studied level 3 once and only failed the exam due to scoring zero in Ethics. I don't want to go through all the same content again. What should I do, sir? Should I wait another 2-3 years for better quality reading materials or should I pursue the private market regardless or stick with traditional level 3 content

I dont understand the need for these pathways. Why go through the private wealth one? Just get the CFP. It seems like the portfolio management pathway is the only one worthwhile here.

30:10 Working with the Wealthy sounds so wrong…..it’s like they are judging those people because they are “Wealthy”

Wow ! We need to flush the CFA Charter down the toilet , this thing has lost its value ...

They really turned woke! They have to get better writers, this is really disappointing.

Once again - sociology is useless!

Yikes, Apart from the crazy socialist shit, at least get the facts right (messing up formulas, not correctly presenting the testable material, etc). People were saying the ESG course was a hinderance to CFAI's credibility and I thought that was overblown. But as someone that passed L3, this is significantly worse for CFAI's reputation. Unfortunately, im still on the job hunt, so the reputation of CFAI still matters significantly for me

And you inferred that author HATES US just because they didn’t glorify it? I expect better from you Mark😒