That is very true. I don't use a lot of AI tools. The ones I do use are generally just part of the process. They help with a specific task while I maintain control of the project.

because you are too expensive for production

@@Cryunreal who is too expensive?

AI can and will only get better. The main issue right now is the people making the ai23d models refuse to let them work with LoRAS or dreambooths, meaning all the really cool stuff SD users can do to customize their pipeline are not available.

@@CGDive you. Human =)

Say's who Ai can't generate a story?

you can ask chat gpt to make a sermon

this is just how advancements work. people are upset and mad because they are scared - rightfully so. but people are so brainwashed that a job defines your worth to society that they are slow to see that they need to start advocating and speaking for UBi so everyone can have a livable wage. In this day in age no reason why we should have labor for next man just to survive.

And no stories / animations will be special anymore except very few good onee

Photography is "lazy", I mean, you just point a camera and take pictures, right? And don't even get me started on digital art. These lazy people can't even be bothered to MIX THEIR PAINT and have a PROGRAM do it... Putting the sarcasm aside, AI is simply another lense for human creativity. The outcome of mediocrity is a user fault, not the tool itself.

@@sarcasticb22 Of course there’s no reason to blame AI, its just maths and codes. But then tool can do everything by just single click makes it not a tool, but worker. But anyway, I think humanity isn’t ready for this kind of tech yet.

@@sarcasticb22 You don't know shoot about photography and digital art and it shows

@@tobbyman3d I understand your reading comprehension is rather low... But I said "putting the sarcasm aside". Do you know what sarcasm is? Perhaps GPT can help you with that?

@@sarcasticb22 You were being sarcastic but you were using it to bring the advent of photography and digital art into comparison with generative AI

I haven't tried that. I would guess that it is optimized for more standard color images

that's a possibility for sure :) I am actually excited about this future even though it means I would lose my "job". And I mean not so much that the tools will do all of the work. I actually don't believe that. I mean more that we may get AI assistants that really provide good info so you don't need to circle around the internet to find out how to do what you need to do.

​@@CGDive might just get into gardening

@@menso3852 hah

At this rate there will be an app to make your own youtuber and you just tell it to make videos on any topic for you

It’s Omnissiah approved

Creativity will vanish because of a version of Pokemon? I don't follow to be honest.

​@@CGDive One of the possible outcomes of AI is the loss of many human skills, including creativity. It will be a gradual process though, if it happens it will take more than one or two years. But it is a very possible scenario. AI may end up becoming a boon for creative processes but in this current climate i expect it to be other way around.

Ignore him. He's just salty about pokemon being usurped by Palworld's success.

@@CGDive Palworld didn't even use AI in the game. Dude's just mad the game of the year was made by 10 dudes just having fun.

Art is dead already. Stupid of ai supportive artists, this will bring them more money by finishing the job fast. While the general public can do the same so easy

Looks like public models can be downloaded for 1 credit.

@@CGDive overpriced

yeah, noone has an issue with that. :)

Definitely, keep practicing. One of my faults is probably that I don't seem to understand people who feel discouraged by the advances of AI. Practicing your art will not hurt you even if AI ends up replacing some parts of the commercial production process.

How so, it's AI generated 3D, it promised trash and delivered exactly that, what is there to be disappointed about?

​@@winxpusr Lmao, that's fair. I'm more so disappointed in CGDive for promoting such a tool. One could argue that it's a "good first step" for artists, but honestly, I think it'd be far better to start from scratch to learn from the experience, make much better results, and feel more gratified for the work you actually put in to say "I made that!" instead of letting a machine do the work. Like, what's the point of making art with Gen AI? For clout to say you "made something amazing"? Waiting to see "pretty" things from key words that some people claim to be hard to do and "as much work as real artists"? Why can't we put more attention and effort into tools that help with the tedious, repetitive processes in art instead, so artists can put more passion into the bigger things? Like filling up flat colors in 2D animation so you don't have to go frame by frame over and over, adding lines in posed faces like Spider-verse so they can focus on other aspects of animation, using a auto select in software like CSP, and so on. And even then, a human would still need to tweak what the tools did to complete their art. Generative AI takes away the life and connection to a human being behind the art, stealing from actual artists who, more often than not, do not consent to have their works put into a machine that spits out amalgamations of images, audio, or text. That's not even touching on how much it costs the environment to make these abominations. Sorry to reply with a paragraph, lol, but as an artist myself, I'm just saddened to see people that I used to follow, who share knowledge and helps others, turn out to side with Gen AI garbage. You'd think they'd understand why this stuff is not good, but I guess not.

@@LinRinku😂this is just like traditional art and digital art , you are the type of people to be stuck in the past , who cares if it’s ai no one Fr as long as it’s done , some of us don’t got time for modeling, just keep on this mind set and you will see

@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist stealing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of GenAI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.

@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist plagiarizing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If even disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of Gen AI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.

Agreed!

not for long sadly

Yeah I’m thinking 2025 will be the year of 3D A.I. Though that’s a looong time in this field currently, so could be sooner

@@DenzelCanvasSupport for very long....

OH NOOO!!!!

I tend to disagree.

@@CGDive May I ask why? Ofc just because you have a calculator it doesnt mean that a mathematician is useless.

@@mclovin9478 You answered your own question :) The mathematician uses the calculator. A calculator (or even a computer) doesn't just make everyone a mathematician.

I didn't make good examples but watch some other videos. Some people have achieved good hard surface models.

Yeah, I think there can be specific type of productions which it is ideal for but certainly not something that is for everyone.

Nah, we'll be fine. But be ready to adapt professionally.

so many ignorant artists parroting this sentiment. AI will not replace human creativity don't be a sheep.

​​@@moonshot3159 is inevitable. But they don't take the AI seriously until the banks have for clients people that don't exist. The AI programers are crazy transhumanist cultists, only comparable to the fictional adeptus mecanicus.

That's good, AI should solve some technically boring tasks such as retopology.

You win the comment section on this one! :D

Saying the black box of weights that compose a model isn't an 'artificial intelligence' is definitely up for debate, because it depends entirely on how you define the term. What exactly comprises intelligence? What does a model need to be capable of to be an 'artificial intelligence' in your eyes?

haha

Hahahaha 😂

AKA mocap? :D

actually there are text to animation solutions already.

@@CGDive OO. I forget Mocap lol XD It's been a while since i opened Blender and my WHOLE pc so yee :) Btw i like your video 🌟

you seem too eager to put me in one of your little mental boxes. bye.

Jazza from Draw With Jazza supports ai too, as does Proko, Scott Eaton, Blender Guru, Aaron Blaisse, and Weta digital. Notice a pattern? People who were always renowned for teaching art to the masses because they found it fun and a good way to make money are all pro ai. The antiai crowd has some good artists sure. But that list is shrinking.

@@spooderderg4077 I don't understand this "pattern" that you are seeing. How are these tut guys profiting from AI? At least I find it more difficult to grow the channel and sell my courses lately which could be due to AI. I also think that AI is more likely to make tut guys obsolete, than to replace all artists.

@@CGDive I said they're pro AI. Not profiting from AI. They actually care about the progression of artists and their skills which is why they are all for it. They made their channels to support more artists in their journeys.

@@spooderderg4077 I see. I guess I did not understand your point initially :)

Your doubt is justified. I searched for a creative commons modelling sheet and that popped up.

I think you edited your reply. Please let me know if you need a refund. Happy to give it to you.

​@@CGDivecreative commons usually requires attribution, just so you know. I'm not mad at you like the OP is, I just think credit isn't a big ask.

@@WannabeMarysue Oh, crap. I thought I had it in the video description. Fixed.