I am glad you found it useful. 👍

Those requirements being 14 digital io 4 analog inputs a charging circuit and Bluetooth. If you know of another board that meets this tell me.

The version I have has the ESP32-C3, as I say in the video, i guess that is a new revision.

@@GaryExplains The -C3 is the RISC-V based espressif chip.

Indeed

the C3 version is only a single core chip btw.

Indeed

I'm trying to think of an application that requires an RP2040 in addition to an ESP32. I've done a lot of bit-slice in my career. AM2900x3wide, 68332 TPU before there was an assembler, Moto DSCs and even EPROM based. Somebody give me a challenge. What does this combo really bring to the table above just an ESP32? It has a core dedicated(?) to comms, leaving the other core for you. Also has FreeRTOS built in. Is it all so that you can write in a higher level language?

I work on embedded devices. If you can put the ESP32 in deep sleep, then this is a very good board. There are applications where you need some heavy computation, like in reading accelorometers. If certain condition is met, you need to send the data over the internet or bluetooth. Then you wake up the ESP32, to make some more heavier computation and send the data wirelessly. I've worked on such systems using an Attiny85 as the "always on" uC, but it was not enough power for me. This board, RP2040+ESP32, is an ideal solution for me.

@@AZOffRoadster A few things. It's an ESP8285 not an ESP32. This is terrible disappointing and cheap skating of them. Why? Well Espressif do not develop anything for the ESP82* series anymore. They are end of life. So the AT Command firmware (which I will come to), is the old out of date one with bugs. The NEW V2. AT Command firmware is only available for the ESP32 and contains built in support for Webservers, and MQTT connections direct from the module, not on the ESP8285 though. At least they added flash memory for it, as by default it has too little to install much. However with the AT Command firmware on there, you get Basic Wifi +Bluetooth classic. So you can do audio and calls etc. By the way. The Wifi chip is flashed with the AT Command firmware. This is a basic "teletype" interface using a single bi-direction UART (Serial). You send it commands like: +JAP MySSID MyPasscode and it responds with OK WIFI CONNECTING WIFI CONNECTED The trouble comes when you want to make a TCP connection (or 2). I'm not sure the AT command version on the ESP8285 allows more than one connection. However the data arrives like this: +TCPRECV:1:4232 You then send: RECV 1:4232 and the next 4232 bytes it sends you is binary data. 1 is the stream id. I'm sure someone will have wrapped this in a driver (hopefully) because handling an asynchronous UART command channel at the same time as trying to asynchronously pick you data back out of it on the data stream is not trival or easy. I know this because my current project is designing a dev board just like this, except with more professional MCU. An STM32F411 + an ESP32 WROOM 3E. Set up the same way, even the WS2812 but with a 2.8" TFT color screen as well. In my case I expose the ESP32 System Serial so you can, if you choose, reflash the ESP32 to do what you want. A note. The ESP8685 AT Command firmware may, or may not support OTA Updates. If it does support that, then you can point it to an HTTP URL to find it's firmware and it will flash itself. Thus, you might be able to reprogram it. Good luck getting to any of it's pins though :(

Both if the MicroCenter stores in Atlanta have stock today. 1 per family.

The more features the more money. Developing and testing is not cheap.

But the title suggests it's a pico w replacement, at 40$ is not even close versus $5

It is also available from tindie www.tindie.com/products/invector/challenger-rp2040-wifi/

@@GaryExplains ok that's a little better about $20, if we can ever get them under $10 I definitely want to try it.

@@billhall1555 and the other features it has magically come into existence for $0 ?

For lots of reasons starting with the fact that the RP2040 is more powerful than the ESP32-C3, then compatibility with the Pico ecosystem, plus many more reasons.

@@GaryExplains thanks

What kind of high performance projects are you talking about?

@@GaryExplains I've played around with ARM M0 processors for a while, and simple things take 16k to 32k (house keeping). This means you only get ~8 house keeping things in RAM at a time. printf is about 4k, and I think a graphical UI ends up being nearly half the RAM. Setting and clearing a pin takes about 3us on M0 without function swapping and if you add your GUI and not too much else I think you get into the realm of memory swaps. If you want to anything realtime beyond that you would see performance degradation. These are only guesses at this stage based on a few 1000 lines of written code.

But the RPi Pico has a XIP, so it doesn't need to copy the content of flash to ram to execute it

@@michabarnas612 I'm talking about the serial flash that stores the applications. It has to down load it. If it doesn't then it can only execute each instruction after it's downloaded which means no pipelining

@@michabarnas612 This is from the description "The RP2040 uses a small internal flash for a bootloader and a larger external flash for everything else". The external FLASH is serial!!

Yes, I understand and will try better, but the code is also in my GitHub repo, so you can go look at it directly.

@@GaryExplains cheers 👍🏻

LOL! Just completed a Teensy 4.1 laser synth prototype, using 3 I2S stereo audio shields for X/Y/R/G/B. Works great, after a few mods for 6 channels. Now, I'm wanting WiFi.🤔 BTW, PJRC's audio library & online Audio Design Tool are great for getting started. Software controlled DSP, filters, mixers, ADSR, etc, etc. BR.

The RP2040 is the chip used by the Pico. I cover it in more detail in my Arduino vs Pico video.

If you want a ESP32 then just get one of those (there are plenty of boards available). If you want an Arm Cortex-M board with WiFi and Bluetooth then get one of these or a Pico W or an Arduino Uno R4 and just think of the ESP32 as a WiFi chip.

Forgive me if I don't trust random makers to design a reliable board. I like to at least see the schematic if everything seems alright, especially if it has lipo charging. But schematic for this board is nowhere to be found. Red flag. Negative Tindie reviews. Another red flag.

@@martincerny3294 Thank you for your feedback regarding my unanswered 6 month old question. 3rd red flag. Actually, I've stayed with the Teensy 4.1 for my laser synth, but upgraded the I2S DAC to the CS42448 CODEC IC, which has 6 ADC inputs, as well as the 6 DAC outputs for the laser projector. That allows it to receive inputs from any ILDA standard OTC laser DAC and software, which can be multiplied/summed with the T4 Laser Synth waveform images. This random maker has just learned KiCad and am putting the finishing touches on my 1st SMD PCB. Wish me luck with the reliability on that. Best regards. 😎

But it doesn't have Wifi.

So "in memory of" or "dedicate to" isn't an idea that you like?

Did you get a chance to look at the example code I have published here: github.com/garyexplains/examples/tree/master/Challenger_RP2040

@@GaryExplains I think I may not have all or the correct libs. When I run your ntp_sync code I get "AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'ESP_WIFI_EN' I also tried running the neopixel test and it bombs on me too with "AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'NeoPixel'". I have the seesaw library but I think I must be missing somethnig. Would you mind sharing your libs? Thank you.

The Bluetooth is enabled but you need to talk to the ESP chip directly using the AT commands. There isn't an abstracted library yet.

You should be able to use the flash storage in CircuitPython and Arduino to store and retrieve values. I'd imaging that you can in MP as well, but I haven't worked with that platform

If you remove the battery connector how do you connect the battery that you want to charge via USB?

As it says on the Raspberry Pi website: Eagle-eyed readers of datasheets will notice that CYW43439 supports both Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low-Energy: we have not enabled Bluetooth on Pico W at launch, but may do so in the future.

No.

It isn't in the diagram but on the datasheet, in the actual text about the neopixel.

Because NTP only gives UTC time which means you need to do all the heavy lifting for timezones and day light saving. World Time API solves that. Besides I also demonstrated NTP as well, so take your pick.

if a mother board ... you may have to remove the RTC battery and short the password reset pin. ( on some mother boards this has worked!)

@@larrypriest5789 unfortunately nothing worked for this board, kindda industrial board

That is for the older revision. The new revision has the ESP32-C3. I have confirmed this by looking at the board I have.

@@GaryExplains I'm surprised that they haven't updated their datasheet. I'm trying to run your WiFiWebServer4Time example. I have commented out the #define WIFIESPAT1 but it doesn't get further than the loop (while (WiFi.status() != WL_CONNECTED) ) where it is trying to connect to Wi-Fi. I have all the latest versions of libraries and my wifi ssid and password are correct and am in the same room as my router. Any thoughts?

Sorted, just needed a WiFi.begin(ssid, password); before the status loop

I don't think the ESP32-C3 is more powerful than the RP2040. Why do you think it is?

@@GaryExplains ah, i missed the C3 part so its single core, sorry. Still very capable though. Can go upto 160MHz, while the RP2040 can go upto 133MHz.

Of course it is capable, that is why it is being used to do all the heavy lifting for the networking end of things, freeing up the RP2040 for the main processing. As a side note, quoting MHz is basically pointless and it depends on how much the CPU can do per cycle, it is known as IPC, Instructions Per Cycle. The ESP32-C3 running at 160MHz could be slower than the RP2040 running at 133Mhz. I haven't tested it, but it is quite likely.

@@GaryExplains i agree, you are right. Would be great if you could make a comparison video between the performance of these embedded microcontrollers. Like RP2040, ESP32-D0WDR2-V3 (dual core variant), RISC-V FE310 SoC (open source hardware) , and may be throw some STM32s into the mix. But its probably too time consuming to standardise a test for all these architectures. A solution could be to use the arduino cores for all these chips and make a standard arduino bench mark. Only processing power, and not RF Capabilities because not all of them have RF.

Try ilabs.se

Thanks. github.com/garyexplains

@@GaryExplains Many thanks

The link is in the description.

@@GaryExplains Typo, Gary you put 'but one' instead of 'buy one' in the description !

Ah, my bad. Fixed! 👍

I am not sure what you mean. Support what exactly?

@@GaryExplains Many ESP32 boards have a special wireless protocol that allows them to communicate with each other wirelessly without the Internet or Bluetooth. It's called ESPnow. I was wondering if the board supported that? If it does, it means it could send speed data to an ESP32 running an instrument cluster, for instance.

@@jeremygeorgia4943 The ESP chip is only for the WiFi/Bluetooth. It isn't intended to be repurposed or reprogrammed.

In my GitHub repo. It is normally the first search result on Google for "garyexplains GitHub"

I thought it was in honor of that vessel and its crew. Interesting that you see it as a negative thing. 🤷‍♂️

@@GaryExplains given the association computers and software have with crashes? Maybe just me. I used to wonder about the loose use of Titanic metaphors when it's sinking was still in living memory. Perhaps I'm becoming over-sensitive in my old age. That said, the board is very nice, and I see how things have changed since I wrote an RTOS for a Z80 based project back in the 80s. It was, somehow, more fun with if a lot less productive than these modern wonders.

For some reason I only remembered the Columbia disaster and not the Challenger as well. Anyways I see it as a homage.

In my GitHub repo. A quick Google search for "Gary Explains GitHub" should get you there.

@@GaryExplains - Got it, thanks

I guess it is better to ask ilabs directly rather than ask here, I am sure they can give you a proper and complete answer.

Don't most devices that are have their FCC license info printed on them? Is that a requirement or just for general information to the user?

Which components? The board itself is in stock.

@@GaryExplains just the RP2040 MCU, alone. The bare component chips. Edit: my bad! Apparently, Mouser got a ton in at the end of July, and more are coming by the end of August. This is great news! Could the shortage be ending???

@@jonathanstein6056 Can get them by the reel in the UK at present. Already have a few bare MCU's for those projects that I still have to figure out!

@@stephenvalente3296 you guys have Pimeroni, to boot. Lucky!

@@jonathanstein6056 Even better, they have a sale on at the moment. 10 X RP2040 chips for £6.30 before shipping. One order on the way, with another underway. Have far too many bits and pieces. They have also removed the 1 Pico W per customer limit too.

there should be an little popup on the right, halfway which allows you to choose a currency ... Swedish Krona