@@JG-ge3ui sri is a trim model, has nothing to do with the engine size or power.. just saying lol

It *might* be a Vauxhall Astra VXR.

​@@jonhoughton372def not a vxr

1.9cdti 150 most likely. If it had a vxr engine in it they never would of got the registration 😂

​@@nathansweeney8902 would have*

Is anyone that chilled in america

Apart from in california were everything is a fine!!

think is could be theres no handgun coming out the window 🙂

Cos Britain isn’t a third world country

@@lmc3307 Yes it is, and it is becoming more so year on year because there are so many coming here from abroad for numerous reasons, and eventually this island will be the dustbin of Europe.

Yeh u already can 😂😢

Was thinking that loll

The technology has improved no end, for sure, but not people’s reaction speeds. That’s why.

Someone was caught in Australia doing approx 70mph, at 110km/h in the Nations Capital on a 90kmh road, police pulled in behind and activated lights and sirens and the scooter refused to stop, a very short time later in his attempt to get away, the man stacked it in the shoulder and crashed the scooter. Funny days

The Ford Interceptor Utility Will Catch That Speeder

Keep left, pass right Richard. There’s enough space on the motorway for all of us.

@@nkiwane263 _Keep left, pass right Richard. There’s enough space on the motorway for all of us._ Thanks for that, Capt. Obvious. But I think Richard's point is that if he had to change lanes (to pass on the right as you so kindly reminded everyone) then due to him not expecting another vehicle to be travelling at eleventy zillion miles an hour there's no way he could correctly gauge the manoeuvre.

@@nkiwane263 Lol, you’ll keep thinking that until you’re going so fast that you crash into a broken down car with its hazards on.

Sounds like to me you were asleep at the wheel. There is no excuse for not using mirrors or indicators when changing lanes.

@Luke Woodside you don't expect cars to be doing 100mph on uk motorways unless they have Blue lights on 🤣

Thank you so much for telling us about your dad

Fool

You're also wrong to be fair. There's no such thing as "the overtaking lane(s)", because under the right circumstances you can legally undertake in lane 1, passing traffic in lanes 2 and 3. The correct usage is "lane 1, lane 2, lane 3, etc".

they're all 'driving lanes' you absolute div. none of them are 'overtaking lanes' either you daft prat. they're just lanes numbered from left to right in ascending order. language is important!

Both WRONG WRONG WRONG. Slow lane, fast lane, overtaking lane. You’re welcome.

@@HumansAreShitFactories On balance Geoff is probably correct here in the spirit of the Highway Code rather than the letter of it, so to speak. One of my absolute anaethemas is seeing idiots overtake in lanes 1 or 2 over the speed limit (i.e., undertaking a car in Lane 3 and 4 - I live near the M25) who is already doing 70-80mph and overtaking a slower moving vehicle. I cannot believe that people weave between traffic in these lanes to gain some sort of perceived advantage of what accrues to a few minutes at best whilst risking everyone's lives. I cannot believe that anyone would countenance being in a vehicle with a driver like that - I would be demanding to leave the car at the next stopping point.

agreed

It’s just not as much fun.

Its, because Traffic Cops only deal with cars on bypasses/motorways, and not offences such as burglary. 999 Response Officers deal with that stuff

Try moving to a house on the motorway

There's fewer traffic cops than ever before. Road deaths are up, despite being on a 40 year decline. We all want our houses patrolled as much as the motorway, but simple logic will deduce that's not possible. Anyway, who's to say that lad doing 150mph may not have been a burglar?

There are often a lot of road-works on the Autobahn as well. usually, speeds are restricted by the variable speed signs, or a traffic jams (Stau) near the bigger cities.

Plus literally just play eurotruck sim 2 and people will see how restrictive many areas of the autobahn are lol.

Are there any parts of the autobahn that isn’t restricted?

driving in a straight line at 150 isnt hard or dangerous if the roads are empty at the car is capable

@C H 150 is still moronic when you think about how badly the UK roads are maintained. Potholes galore, modulations, bad road repairs, debris.... it's not just about colliding with another car.

@@thefiestaguy8831 If you know your area and the roads, and you know which ones have less traffic at night or which ones are safer, I don't see the problem especially at an anti social time like 2am?

@@audify3833 It's about the unexpected, you can "know your roads" all you like. But when some drunken bloke suddenly steps out from behind a car at midnight on a dark road, and you hit them at 60 despite it being a posted 40 speed limit you will have an extremely difficult time convincing any judge and jury that you should not be convicted of an offence, if said person is seriously injured or dies you're likely to spend time in custody. Is it worth a prison sentence over going a bit quicker? I don't generally speed around and not on residential roads.

@@thefiestaguy8831 potholes on the motorway barley any

150mph is nothing these days and its very easy to reach them speeds in a mid to high end car. Hardly heroic the way you're describing lol

@@riazhussain2333 I won’t dare to drive at such a high speed.

@@shakilnasir3829 lol I can tell. Wouldn't class you as a man.

@@riazhussain2333 hahaha I had 3 litre petrol 6 cylinders car but the limit is only 70 miles , I can’t risk my license, I did try few times but scared of police.

@@riazhussain2333 Don't think anyone would class you as one either

Having driven on a German Autobahn you realise how pleasant and polite UK drivers are in general

​​@@Steve14ps Pfffft, as if. Some are "kind", maybe, but not very skilled.

he didn't say anything about 'kind' or 'skilled'. Can you actually read? @@epender

That is because it shares many lame borders with other nations

Commentator is wrong, there is NO 'fast lane'.

There is an overtaking lane and no fast lane according to the highway code

Lanes are 1 , 2 and 3 , end of

There is no fast lane, however given the speed it was probably safer to be in lane 3. at 150 mph you really don't want to be destabilising the car.

It is the overtaking lane, hence cars will generally be going faster, not to mention the rules are that you must not be in the right or middle lane unless overtaking in the UK, with automated cameras fining people who sit in the right lanes, it will almost certainly be clear, and far safer for him to do that speed, as driver are better able to see their own side lane, than the passenger side lane.

To keep it simple: a vehicle that's moving twice as fast, needs _four_ times more braking distance. 3x as fast, 9x the braking distance.

30 feet in Tesla

It will just be for show, i doubt he actually got all that

@@YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I bet he did get that. It's not "just for show" at all.

@@thefiestaguy8831Nah bet he didn't

150bhp diesel

maybe 200bhp if mapped

@@Soulvex ah fair haha Vauxhalls are quite quick tbh

So much discretion back then

@@andybray9791 my boot had my holiday clothes in

true, the police and military are extremely skilled. there just not enough

Absolute BS. You want real Police? Look at Western Europe.

​@@finewine1001quality over quantity

Well Germany does have speed limits except on a few bits of road. As for deaths/accidents you're talking out of your bottom. UK has safer roads, unless you can point to stats that say otherwise.

@@jswmonkey197 Recenty drove on the 3, 2, 1 and 44 autobahn from Arnhem to Paderborn. The population density is very very high in this area and yet the speed limits stayed higher than I expected. On the 3 I probably sat just over 100mph. The 2 and 1 did have limits overhead 120kph is quite common if I remember right but a lot more was unrestricted than I thought. The 44 I pretty much sat at 120+mph was still overtaken by other cars. Fuel use is a bit silly at that speed. They do put weather limits in place (100kph/80kph) but that should be common sense and some day/night limits. UK does have safe roads, although I think the standard of driving is getting worse and worse here. Lane discipline and driving at speed the Germans and the Dutch seem to do a lot better, although driving through Beligum I was disappointed to see a German plate sat in the middle lane for no reason, still not nearly as bad at the M25 or any UK Motorway.

@@jswmonkey197 uhm, about 40 % that are derestricted + sections with temporary speedlimits depending on traffic. and the highway network is 13,000 km in lenght, so I wouldn't call that "a few bits".

Bruh the ignorance of your comment about Germany

@@firstname4865 what ignorance??

Suspended - Means let off basically.

That only applied to the Irish. It used to be 16yrs for any offence you didn't committ..

you woudnt say the same if you were the one that had to scrape them off the road

@@Heneling - I would actually. I can't be patronising no matter how hard I try.

😂 unlucky matey

Pretty sure in the UK you lose your licence if driving over 100mph

that doesn't mean it's a better system, if that's the point you're trying to make. That just shows how brain dead australian speeding laws are then, if what you're saying is true.

@@JamesSmith-cm7sg u can get suspended but it wouldn't be an indefinite thing if that's what you mean.

@@YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO got insurance ?

'Self-incriminating himself' as opposed to self incriminating whom?

No he didn't. You can't "incriminate" yourself. For no insurance the officer needs to witness you driving, OR a witness willing to provide a statement, or other form of evidence, such as CCTV or photographs taken showing you driving. Just stating "I was driving" a vehicle without insurance isn't evidence, so the "self incrimintion" is moot. There is no need to prove intent or have an admission for a no insurance offence, the offence is absolute, you've either committed it or you haven't, there's no "in between".

Yeah, the condition of the roads themselves is what suddenly makes them dangerous…

The autobahn is only unlimited in limited places where it’s straight and road surface is level. For example there’s a bump on M1 in lanes one and two not long before you get to staples corner where the car goes very light and possibly airborne at 70mph. Hit that at 150 you’d be in trouble.

We re treated like children in this country, funny how the astra driver is dangerous but the cop chasing doing same speed is not.

@@kevinskipp2762 Same rules apply here you don't do 150mph around a corner on motorway do ya xD you slow down a bit haha

@@stephenmontgomery8530 I agree he was chasing for a long time! Makes you wonder how much longer he would keep driving dangerously for.

I saw 180 on the clock on an R1 in torrential rain once.

its community service, basically you have to do 200 hours of stuff like picking up litter, cleaning parks etc.

Because doing any speed with no plates gets you pulled over.

@@Naeron66 why would you stop if you don't have playes on in the first place, not exactly like they'll get your reg plate 🤔

@@louislatimer2003 Not like you have a great chance of getting away in the long term in the first place as you will be noticed every time you drive. Pretty quick way to rack up the fines (up to £1000 each time).

@@Naeron66 $1000

Road deaths are going up, despite a trend over the last 40 years of it decreasing. Why do you think that is? We cannot justify increasing speed limits when we are having more people die on the roads (despite cars being so much safer).

100%

Zzzzz...

my dad literally said the same to me yesterday saddd

Honesty is key dude.

@@Squi-A-tone the key to a prison cell

@@williamlambert1711 yea exactly.

1. He didn't have to answer the door, but he didn't, the female did. 2. He doesn't need to admit it. She has the registration which is all she needs. She could send a Notice of Intended Prosecution to the registered keeper (likely him) if they didn't answer the door. The NIP would ask him to name the driver at the time of the offence, if he refused to engage with it or name the driver (himself) it's a seperate offence and he'd get a minimum of 6 points and a large fine. You'd have to be pretty dull to think if you don't answer the door they can't do anything about it.

@@williamlambert1711 It's not a given 6 points.. it's a MINIMUM of 6. Failure to provide the particulars of a driver is viewed as quite serious by courts, because it suggests you have little regard for laws of the land and don't take the courts seriously. They don't take kindly to that and punish it as they see fit. You're also wrong in the 12 points for over 100. A colleague of mine got caught doing 105 on the M25 motorway during COVID, early 2021. He plead guilty via the postal means and the magistrate awarded him 5 penalty points and a £550 fine.

diesel astra will do 130 easily

speeding is illegal in the uk thats why they are pulled over. usually people that speed are under the influence of drugs.

if the speedometer is calibrated then yes it can be used as evidence, with a date and time stamp ofc

Imagine that a calibrated GPS camera shows the speeder pass a specific junction or directions sign, then shows the police officer pass that same sign at a given time, then shows the same police officer going a certain speed and catches up with the speeder, and on that same camera you can see a specific bridge or road sign or landmark, you can work out how fast they were going because speed = distance over time so I'd assume they can use that if it got to it!

Traffic officers are trained to recognise speed. They can stand in court and state "He was doing approximately double the limit" and they are likely to believed although there will be a degree of tolerance. Secondly, the speedometer is calibrated (Notice the R.S NOTTM text in the speedo - this is a company based in nottingham that calibrate speedometers for a lot of police forces in that area). His car also has dashcam that has GPS speed included, GPS speed is far more acurate than a speedometer (with the exception being a calibrated one). All of these things are evidence. I'm a serving officer in a different force, and I am aware of two of my colleagues that reported someone for speeding (despite not being traffic officers and thus not trained to recognise approximate speed). Simply because they both had the same opinion the car was speeding, so stopped him, they both wrote statements which served as evidence and would have been prepared to go to court. As far as I know the guy got convicted but I don't recall the exact speed, although he was allegedly doing twice the speed limit through a residential road in the rain in a town centre.

whats the best way to go about them situations? When police knock on your door for 'alleged' speeding

@@audify3833 don't answer, don't co operate, don't speak, etc

Who respects peugeot or vauxhall?

Ironically, as a UK officer myself, most of the cars ARE vauxhall, pegeout and some smaller BMW's, some use Ford too. Slowly being replaced by Toyota Corolla estate cars.

wtf is a pegout ?

sholdnt?

It was the Home Secretary last week.

It's an overtaking lane.😎

Being pedantic doesn't help.

@@resnonverba137 no problems.

I think you're right. If someone's speeding, just let them go. Same as robberies. The perpetrator COULD have a knife. And that COULD be dangerous. So just leave them be. They'll go home eventually when they're finished. Much safer that way

Difference being in 99% of cases the person speeding isn't trained whereas those are. The drivers in this clip are "advanced" which is the hardest driving course any police officer can ever take, it's extremely intensive and plenty of officers who've been driving at speed on blues for years still fail it. The pass rate is around 50% and they expect you to make so much progress. A colleague of mine who was a "quicker" driver on my old team dropped out of the course on week 1 of 3, stating that it took him "Well out of his comfort zone" and that "He was being expected to make so much progress, at one point his instructor wanted him to exceed 100Mph in a 30 zone". Police drivers are taught to the roadcraft system and until you've been on numerous response runs like I have (in my case, hundreds) it's hard to really grasp how well the majority drive.

No. Perfectly permitted. How about unmarked cars covertly following suspects ?

Not at all. Traffic was light, road conditions basically perfect.

Nope its not. I got off lightly through Covid lockdown worked through it cause i work in retail. Driving home at 23:00 one night in my fiesta ST doing 120mph unmarked car was pacing me so i slowed down in time at around 90mph. 3 points and £100 fine.

@@DPR0fl Sounds like a nightmare .. insurance goes up etc.

No. NOTHING whatsoever in any law states that any form of warning equipment, whether lights or siren, must be utilized in order to make use of exemptions. The exemptions apply to trained police drivers (not all of them are) and it is their justification for whatever speed they choose to drive at, and their usage of warning equipment. Legally they can pass a car at speed without anything activated, overtake, pass through red ATS, etc. I'm a serving officer and been present when it's been done numerous times.

Must have been a very breezy day 😁

the most important thing probably is that it's normal in Germany, so people are used to it. That goes for those that drive fast and also for those that don't drive fast. In other countries, if you already drive at the speed limit, you don't necessarily expect someone to come from behind at high speeds, so you are also less vigilant when it comes to lange changing. At least that's a guess. Of course you also have sleepy drivers in Germany, but still it's a big aspect.

Germany been one country out of hundreds

@@firstname4865 you do know the 70mph speed limit was brought in by Barbara Castle, a non-driver, against the advice of the police and others at the time. The committee (of 12) had a majority against so Castle switched the meeting to the morning unannounced so she and two others on her side could vote it through unopposed. It was set as the top speed of a cross-ply shod Ford Anglia. Like the ludicrously out of date stopping distances in the UK’s highway code, time it was reconsidered rationally.

@@adriancoppola3729 and yet the idiots speeding keep on crashing already

@@paultruesdale7680 I'm too old. My son is a cop.

Oooooooo

Why?

I don't. Some of them have families, young children. It's not fair on their dependants.

Yeah the difference is night and day. Germany has better roads for a start, ours are caked in potholes, badly repaired potholes, bumps, modulations, debris, you name it.... Secondly there's the drivers. I'm a "spirited driver" and I like to drive a bit lively, I don't speed around at breakneck speed like a lunatic, because I value my license and other people's lives, but I didn't buy a 3 litre car for no reason. Unfortunately there's a lot of drivers in the UK who are NOT competent in my view to be behind the wheel of a car, some people can't do 30 without slamming on the brakes at a roundabout which you can see is clear before you get to it, or slowing right down for every slight bend. Then there's the people who think that indicating gives you right of way - it doesn't. Indicating left/right does not mean you can suddenly just pull into that lane, it's to signal your intention, you still have to check it's clear and safe to move. Then there's the people who sit in the middle lane on the motorway and refuse to move, even after you flash them to give them a bit of "help" they still don't move over, some move over and as soon as you pass (and move over to the most left lane yourself) they then go back into the middle lane. Then you have the people that sit on national speed limit roads doing half of it for no apparent reason. Just yesterday I was sat behind some bloke doing 25-30 on a wide country road with a 60Mph limit that is about 1.5 miles long. The lack of any speed signs and the national speed limit sign AND layout of the road would have suggested that it's a 60 Mph road, but either he was thick or too afraid to go any quicker, which makes my point, people have no confidence in their ability to drive to the speed limit when it is safe to do so. Frankly it's quite pathetic how poor the driving standards are in this country. Whilst I know you probably have similar issues in Germany I'm fairly confident it's not to the same extent as it is over here.

@@thefiestaguy8831 Well firstly to address your pothole issue which I agree is a big issue here on UK roads they are only prevelant on city roads and some country roads, motorways however its very rare to find them on motorways and even the ones that do exist on motorways are small. To address your second issue... there are incompetent drivers on UK roads but if its the case thats refraining us from reaching higher speeds on UK motorways due to the incompetence of some drivers then the driving test needs a revamp to incorporate modules on higher speeds because like I said the safety of car technology has increased ten fold over the last half century whereas the speed limit has been the same for the past 60 years which is a shame. You may argue the fuel element to this in that driving at higher speeds burns more fuel and isnt eco friendly but cars nowadays are more fuel efficient than they ever were plus with the introduction of hybrids and electric vehicles etc

@@riazhussain2333 Frankly I couldn't care any less about the environment lol so the fuel argument is irrelevant to me. Where I live is pothole city, the roads around here are atrocious, constant road works, constant road re-surfacing and months later there's potholes all over it again. A lot of them around here are massive and cause flat tyres as a result. I agree with the speed limit part however that's not realistically ever going to be incorporated into "driving at speed" as the UK teaches "driving safely" not at speed. Alas, sometimes I do wish I lived in Germany...

@@thefiestaguy8831 Yeah I agree, driver's lane discipline on motorways/A roads are terrible in this country. It's not about the speed limit changing because people already do 80 in a 70 as it is (10% + whatever) , or even higher given an area with none/inactive speed cameras and low police presence (Waze lol) etc. If people's lane discipline would improve, especially London sides, then there'd be no space to weave in and out dangerously at high speed. People driving "dangerously" like the lad here is a knock-on cause of the general motorist driving dangerously/without paying attention and they don't even realise it. Like in my opinion, people will be quick to blame the young lad who's driving spiritedly on a road suitable for it, albeit slightly dangerously (so he should get some blame), but way more than a 30year old who's barely paying attention, middle lane hogging, talking down his phone and sipping on a drink all at the same timme. Many people drive with barely any attention nowadays, and I think thats much worse than someone who might be flooring it on roads where the type of road/weather/road condition is suitable for it and is 100% focussed. Like op said, car safety has improved drastically but i don't think the limit should change because them same drivers who dont pay attention will be doing that speed, and thats way more dangerous. Those who currently do 65 in a 70 in lanes 2 and 3, will do 70 in an 80/90 etc. Those young idiots with baloons in their mouth will do even higher. Whereas the limit staying 70 will do this dumb public better. Kid in this vid should've been given a warning while the driver who braked in front of the police at the T junction, retraining. That's worse, how can u not hear sirens and see lights while driving at that junction.

@@audify3833 It isn't 10%+ officially, that's ACPO guidance. Police forces can still prosecute for 1Mph over, but most won't although it used to be done in the past and nowadays the just use the threshold to give some leniency. Also remember that most speedometers over-read, so if you are caught doing for example 35MPH and say "I didn't know I was speeding" your speedometer would have been displaying in the region of 36-38Mph. Most people won't have calibrated speedometers.

I'm in a UK police service. In the one i'm in, no it's not standard, only in the station vans used for conveying prisoners, you're usually on your own in those but sometimes might have an "operator" (front seat passenger who does comms on radio, and navigates you whilst you drive). That said I have been out single crewed on my own on numerous occassions before, even in somewhat rough areas of London. Some forces send their officers out single crewed - because it's a larger spread of officers across the whole county if you have 10 officers out in 10 cars instead of 10 officers out in 5 cars. Cover more ground and reduces the overall response time generally to a particular incident.

@@thefiestaguy8831 yes, it makes sense to adopt ten cars for 10 officers. In Northern Ireland, it is very sparsely populated, therefore officers in pairs makes sense. But the main reason is the situation in northern IIreland. All police vehicles are bulletproof, and can resist bombs.

npcs haven't

@@FF-pq2ex they’re controlled by a number in a red circle even if the roads clear 😂

@@audify3833 hahaha fr some won't even get close to that number though 50 in a 70 is enough for them

@@FF-pq2ex @audify3833 lol people i speak to always say 100 is reckless. What's funny is these same people havent even done over 80, which is the legal limit in a lot of countries

@@gulaagjamun they've been force fed BS information by the media, things like 'speeding kills' and all that. They take it literally

what??

slow lane is for trucks limited to 60 really. but ye, no fast lane formally but it's what we call it

It's been called a fast lane for decades, little point in being pedantic about it now. You know as well as everyone else exactly what he's talking about.

@@resnonverba137 Its never been called a "fast lane". The only people that call it that are clearly uneducated about the highway code. Also I know someone that hogs lane 2 on a motorway because they don't see themselves as a slow driver so won't use the "slow" lane (their words, not mine). Totally illegal and dangerous.

@@hogshouse I can assure you that it has. If you think otherwise, you're either too young to remember or have lived with your head in the sand. Lane-hogging is an entirely different conversation.

@@resnonverba137 no mention of a fast lane in the highway code. They call them overtaking lanes. Also said person thinks that there is a slow lane and a fast lane therefore sits in lane 2 so I think it's relevant because they are not the only person I've met that does that for the same reasons. All lanes are 70mph unless stated differently

And yet most people call it the Fast Lane.

@@Naeron66 do they, could you share your data?

Sometimes, yes. It was an indicated 150 plus here.

then they would find it and pull fingerprints from it and all sorts... can only pull a stunt like that if you want to clean it before they show up ;D

@@damiandynski1804 drive with gloves innit

@@hershey6171 dont be ridiculous mate, going to tesco’s and putting gloves on? Please 😂 would love to see you put a set on every time u go for a drive lol

@@damiandynski1804 people do drive with driving gloves

@@YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Are you stating a fact or telling the obvious? How many realistically drive with gloves on? 1 every 500 drivers at best.

The difference is training. Police drivers are trained to drive at that speed. You and I are not. It’s not hypocritical at all, you just clearly don’t understand education in road craft or how policing works.

@@hausmaster9801 Regardless of whether they are trained or not, the fact that they are doing that speed without indicating that they are police is the problem. How are other motorists supposed to know that this random car is police? Without blue lights, they are effectively the same risk as untrained getaway drivers as they are not warning other motorists that they are going faster as they are police

@@audify3833 In that theory they should never have unmarked cars in the first place. It’s no where near as dangerous as a untrained getaway driver as the officers are trained to read ahead and adjust their driving to vehicles around them. I agree you can’t tell it’s a police vehicle without the lights on, however the dangers are completely different. You can’t compare an untrained driver to a fully trained officer that has had training for several years in advanced driving. You also have to realise sometimes having the lights and sirens on isn’t always the best option for the initial start of a pursuit as it gives the getaway driver a heads up there is an officer gaining. An unmarked police vehicle with a highly trained driver behind the wheel does no way near compare to an untrained driver who is only focused on their speed and getting away. Like it or lump it it’s how things are and sometimes you have to do things that are slightly dangerous to stop an even more dangerous situation.

Advanced is a 5 week course with a high failure rate, the training is next level

Yes, 130 is dangerous for some idiot in a powerful car with the basic training required to be granted a license, still dangerous for the police to do, but the police have intensive advanced driving courses they must take and they also have bright blue flashing lights and a siren to warn you they're coming. I'd trust a police officer to drive that speed more than my neighbour that's only had their license for a year or two.

@@jollybodger theres footadge of them struggling round a bumpy bend at 140mph

Because very often the reason for attempting to escape a pursuing officer is that far more serious crimes are being committed. Beyond obvious really.

Pursuit trained drivers are just that, they are safer driving at 150 than you are at 70.

Don't be so wet, Christine.

@@Naeron66 that's rubbish and even if you say they trained drivers the people they chasing are not trained fast drives and it's the pushing the people to run is the very dangerous thing. I know off people killed by a police car in a chase. Is it worth killing anyone ?

it was his parents that opened the door

And yet everywhere we are born free? How do you mean - where do slaves come into it?